| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2101
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
Victorycreed's Comment
Not a member of Reality Kings.
But as far as spam, that's a personal issue, and a fact of life. Unless you're really good with computers and know how to filter your email, if you've been online for a while and have a regular email address, you're almost sure to get a lot of daily spam.
Some of the spam will be sex-related, other spam will be general junk offers.
Just like what you get in the old-style mail box, except that you don't get sex-related spam in the mail box. And that's only because it costs real money to send the old-style mail.
|
01-31-09 01:33pm
|
Reply
2102
|
Sweet Sophie Moone
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
She is a gorgeous, sweet-looking girl. Wish her the best in her retirement.
|
01-31-09 01:23pm
|
Reply
2103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Poll
Too far out for me to appreciate.
|
01-26-09 02:18am
|
Reply
2104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
The important factors for me in rating or joining a site are:
-content quality
-content quantity
-site ease of use
-price
If the site has good-looking models, quality pics, and it gets a high score, then I will at least look at the site, to see if it's worth joining.
A low score for the type of site I'm interested in means I probably won't even look at the site.
But score by itself is just one factor. I'm more interested in the type of site, and then the other factors I use in rating a site.
|
01-24-09 03:34pm
|
Reply
2105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I'm picky about the porn I like. So most of the porn sites that I would visit as a porn reviewer would not really appeal to me. And I would have a heck of a time trying to score them based on the scoring system that TBP reviewers use. I use a gut feel on my scores, based on content quality, quantity, site ease of use, and price.
That's also the way I try to figure out if a site is worth joining, for me.
|
01-24-09 03:16pm
|
Reply
2106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As long as the trial is full access to the site, you should be able to write a review of the site. It doesn't take that long for most PU members to judge a site.
You won't see the entire contents of a mega-site in a few days, but you should get the basic feel of the site quality and contents, of the pix and vids offered.
If the review is based on a trial membership, that should be clearly mentioned in the review.
|
01-24-09 03:03pm
|
Reply
2107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never surfed porn on someone else's computer. Most people would really have a problem if they found out that someone used their computer to surf porn.
|
01-24-09 02:51pm
|
Reply
2108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
English is the only language I know. I took Spanish in high school for a few years, but forgot all of it.
|
01-24-09 02:44pm
|
Reply
2109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
In the past, I've been a 1-year member at met-art, metmodels, and hegre-art, and was a member of domai and glamdeluxe for over 1 continuous year.
But most sites I join are for 1 month.
Met-art might be worth another 1-year membership for me. But the other sites would be a 1-month membership.
|
01-24-09 04:35am
|
Reply
2110
|
Summer Banks
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
OK, why would anyone pay $14.95 for a 3-day trial, when you can get 1 month for $19.95?
Unless you could be sure to download the site contents in a 3-day trial, you might as well pay the extra $5 for a full month.
But since the site is apparently not updating since June 2008, based on atrapat's reply, and since the site has never been reviewed at PU, I would not pay to join this site.
|
01-22-09 07:45am
|
Reply
2111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've seen people at conventions that I've seen online, but that doesn't count towards knowing them personally.
But people in the adult industry are real people, with husbands, wives, kids, etc.
|
01-22-09 07:34am
|
Reply
2112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Without plot, there is no meaning to the story. How can you have two or more people having sexual intercourse without the deepest, most meaningful interaction of two souls uniting?
Perhaps, with solo masturbation, there might be less necessity for a long prelude before the action. Everyone knows that if you don't have to wait for your partner's climax, that you can cum whenever the mood or finger of fate strikes.
This is probably one of the stranger poll questions I have yet seen. I sincerely hope my comment does honor to this issue.
|
01-20-09 02:34am
|
Reply
2113
|
Jenny Poussin VIP
(0)
|
Reply of
KWH1071's Review
When someone gives a very high score of 95+, most Pornusers members tend to regard the score suspiciously. That's just the PU mentality. The members don't believe in perfect sites. And they have definite ideas on how almost all porn sites could be improved.
To write a review and list no cons is a definite no-no.
Even if you are completely in love with a site, you should still list at least a few minor cons, just for the sake of appearing non-biased. Your review would be better accepted, and be more persuasive to the PU members.
I like your review, and believe it's your honest opinion.
But before posting any more reviews, a good idea would be to read the thread, "What should a PU review include?", especially the post by Toadsith titled: "Porn Users Cheat Sheet".
Toadsith, a PU member, posted a great outline for writing a review that shows what many of the PU members want to see included in a review.
What you write is up to you. But like I say, your reviews will have greater weight if you write a more balanced review, and maybe include some technical details.
See the thread: What should a PU review include?
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ead.html?threadid=57
|
01-19-09 01:16pm
|
Reply
2114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Define old age.
|
01-18-09 10:14am
|
Reply
2115
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
bacardiancoke's Review
Nice solid review of met-art. Welcome to PU, from one newbie to another.
|
01-16-09 06:25am
|
Reply
2116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Webmasters are human. Can they lose or misplace files? Sure, why not? Not everyone is as organized as efficiently as everyone else. And it's human nature for some people to try to promote themselves, so if they find some older pics and vids, they can say, "Hey, look at this great stuff we found."
On the other hand, they can also promote some pics and vids that were never really lost, but just say that the material was lost.
I know that I lose files on my hard drive all the time. I want to see pics of some girl, I can find some of them, but I know there're other pics of her somewhere. But where?
Need to organize my hard drive better. Just one more thing to do.
|
01-16-09 05:33am
|
Reply
2117
|
Teen Stars Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
"Ethel and Martine: practically worth the money (to join) just for these two beauties."
You totally missed the point.
In no particular order:
Isabella, Maria, Nicole, and Rebecca are the real reasons to join Teen Stars Magazine.
Although I must say there are other great-looking models on the site as well.
|
01-15-09 02:15pm
|
Reply
2118
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Tatyana the model is married to the site photographer, David Weisenbarger. But at least he is willing to share her photographs with us. He does a nice job capturing this lovely young woman on film, along with other young models. Extremely nice photos in the style of met-art (teen/young-women glam photos).
|
01-15-09 12:37pm
|
Reply
2119
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
Tatyana's Reply
Tatyana webmaster: Are you the Tatyana model at david-nudes? If so, you are one gorgeous woman.
Also, I read that you are married to David, the site photographer. If that is true, how could you do that to the rest of us?
At least we can enjoy your pictures. You really are a lovely young woman (if you are the model at the site).
Wishing you the best, and hoping your site does well.
|
01-15-09 10:50am
|
Reply
2120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I don't know if Angelina Jolie considers porn socially acceptable, but she is supposed to have an email friendship with a porn star.
"Jan. 14, 2009. Los Angeles (E! Online) – Does Angelina Jolie have friends? There is never any mention of her having friends, and there is extensive coverage about her.
—Karen, Los Angeles
Per the New York Post, Jolie has a "girl-talk thing going" with porn star Tera Patrick. The two reportedly like to email each other. Does that count?"
|
01-14-09 03:41pm
|
Reply
2121
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Poll
The major sites already have high res photos. Going to still higher res photos would just take up even more space on the hard drive, so I don't see the point of that, except for bragging rights.
Better videos would be nice. That's different from higher res videos. Videos that are shot and edited better, that are more erotic, would be a real plus.
But the easiest thing to improve would probably be easier site navigation.
|
01-14-09 09:36am
|
Reply
2122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Maybe a lawyer should answer this topic, but I would guess that you could be cited for reading a porn magazine in a bar. In some areas you could be cited for smoking in a bar. You do drugs in a bar, you could be cited.
I don't think you could be cited for driving a SUV to a bar, unless you broke some law while driving.
I also don't think you could be cited for wearing a "Jesus Saves" jacket in a bar.
Those are my opinions, but I am not a lawyer.
So when you say that porn is socially tolerated, you are speaking very broadly. Porn is not socially or legally tolerated in many public areas.
|
01-12-09 05:05pm
|
Reply
2123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I think porn is more tolerated today than back in the 1960s. But how far have we really come, as a society? America is still uptight and ready to police your neighbor for any and all activity outside the mainstream. And porn is definitely outside the mainstream.
|
01-12-09 10:30am
|
Reply
2124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Even tho past polls are archived and can still be voted on, a current poll, even if it's basically the same idea as a past poll, just seems fresher and more relevant. A few current votes on a past poll would have little effect on most people. How many PU members actually go over past polls every few months to see what was voted for, and to see the results?
|
01-11-09 09:05pm
|
Reply
2125
|
Snot Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
This is the stupidest porn site I've seen so far. (I have not seen the inside of the site, but the idea of watching a girl pick her nose is truly a bizarre fetish.)
|
01-11-09 05:09pm
|
