| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2126
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Definition of porn: writing or pictures or films etc. of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire.
I think Playboy (and softcore sites like Met-art and others) have nude pictures, but the pictures have value beyond sexual stimulation. Porn is a derogatory word, like smut. I don't think Playboy or Met-art is smut. That's my personal opinion.
But there's also nothing wrong with sexual stimulation. You look at a picture of a beautiful or attractive woman, you don't feel some desire or appreciation, maybe you're more dead than alive.
|
01-08-09 01:30am
|
Reply
2127
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Usually try to cancel within a week, in case there are problems with the cancellation. I've been lucky so far, no problems, no extra billing charges.
|
01-04-09 03:52am
|
Reply
2128
|
Ten.com
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
When I clicked on the join page, I saw 2 options:
3 day trial for $4.95
1 month membership for $29.95
It took me 7 attempts, pasting the URL you gave me, to get a page with the complete pricing options you showed:
3 Day Trial - $4.95
1 Month Membership - $29.95
3 Months Membership - $59.90 (1 Month FREE!!!)
6 Months Membership - $74.99 (Only $12.50 per month!)
1 Year Membership - $99.95 (Only $8.33 per month!)
Lifetime Membership - $174.99 (One Time Charge)
(The browser page kept redirecting me back to the 2 option membership page, until I finally got lucky.)
Thanks for the fast response, and the help.
|
01-03-09 05:29am
|
Reply
2129
|
Ten.com
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
A lifetime membership for $175 fee sounds like a great deal. My major question would be: how long does a lifetime last? Some of these porn sites go out of business after a few years, or stop updating their material. So who knows how long Ten.com will be around?
Also, I go to their site, and do not see the lifetime membership offered at the membership signup page. Where do you find that option?
|
01-03-09 05:07am
|
Reply
2130
|
Jim Slip
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Comment
I am based in United States. When I check the web site Jim Slip, I see a sign-up rate of euro 19.95, approximately USD 27.76.
The prices that are displayed to someone in Italy could be different, because of something called regional pricing (I think that's the proper term). For the same item (a membership, whatever), you can be charged different prices, depending on where you are located. Sector pricing seems unfair, and stupid, but it's another way for some people or businesses to make more money off of people.
There has been some discussion of sector pricing on the PU threads, and a lot of people are really angry when they think they are being charged higher prices than some US customers are paying for the same membership.
|
01-02-09 06:25am
|
Reply
2131
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
It doesn't make a lot of sense, but I've found that met-art, with its huge collection of models, photosets, and videos, is easier to search and find what you're looking for than sites that have far less content.
Met-art has the basic search engine, which lets you search by model name, photographer, etc.
And it also has a complete, alphabetical listing of the models, with a thumbnail of each model beside the name, that you can browse.
Simple tools, but really effective.
One quibble is that the same model can have different names for different photosets.
|
01-02-09 05:35am
|
Reply
2132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
The primary factor for me is lack of quality content, then price, then ease of use. Bad reviews, no zip files, drm protection mean I should look for a better site to join.
|
01-02-09 05:16am
|
Reply
2133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Some avatars are really cool, and I have been disappointed when they were dropped. Just my opinion.
|
12-31-08 06:13am
|
Reply
2134
|
Hentai Key
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
The penalties for porn are often harsher than the penalties for stealing or falsifying thefts of hundreds of millions of dollars in the business world.
|
12-30-08 10:34am
|
Reply
2135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Holidays are family time, while porn is private time.
|
12-29-08 05:34am
|
Reply
2136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Stopped buying Playboy back in the 1980s, over 20 years ago.
|
12-27-08 03:58pm
|
Reply
2137
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
4 girls at once would be my fantasy. Why not make it my top 100,000, as long as we're dreaming? Somebody would have to freeze me, because there's no way I could last that long, but what a way to go.
|
12-25-08 07:31am
|
Reply
2138
|
Secret Virgin
(0)
|
Reply of
diablo1967's Review
If you are able to get back into the members area, please let us know.
Or if you never get back in, and try to get a refund, please let us know whether you get a refund or not, and how you did it.
Sorry about your site problems.
|
12-24-08 06:17am
|
Reply
2139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
No. Want a copy on my PC of worthwhile videos. That's what I'm paying for.
|
12-23-08 09:47am
|
Reply
2140
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Not a member. Just some general advice.
Can you get a refund thru the billing agent?
It looks like Amour Babes uses EPOCHEU.COM, which gets a lot of complaints about poor service, wrong charges, etc.
But it's worth calling them (if they have a toll-free number) to explain you have been denied access to a site even tho you still have a current subscription.
You might get a refund.
Or, if you paid for your subscription with a credit card, explain to the credit card company that you paid for a service you did not receive (membership to an internet site). The credit card company should reverse the money you paid (give you a refund/credit).
|
12-22-08 11:43am
|
Reply
2141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sitsat's Poll
I dislike them all, think they detract from the attractiveness of the model.
In approximate order of dislike:
Tattoos
Fake breasts - especially the huge ones
Too much make-up
Unnatural hair colour
Tongue-piercing
I put Tongue-piercing at the bottom, because it's the least noticeable.
|
12-21-08 08:53am
|
Reply
2142
|
Sweet And Nude
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
One problem is quantity. The site appears to have quality softcore pix, but a limited amount of content.
I realize it's a dream for each photographer who wants to start his own site, but it would sure be more economical if some of these photographers agreed to form a ring where membership to one site would entitle you to access to other softcore photographers' sites.
Quantity at Sweet and Nude:
models: 20
sets: 46
photos: 11,183
|
12-20-08 07:24pm
|
Reply
2143
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I've been looking at Ulya G since 2005 at met-art. Her face kind of reminds me of Catherine Zeta Jones (the actress married to Michael Douglas).
But the only sites I've seen her on are met-art and metmodels.
|
12-20-08 05:08pm
|
Reply
2144
|
SF Bay Models
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Maybe I'm getting old, and trying to be careful with my porn dollars, but I wouldn't join this site unless someone I really trusted (and likes the same kind of pix I do) wrote a glowing review of this site and gave it a high score.
The free tour of the site (with it's lack of nice-sized sample pix) is a turn-off for me.
I want to see if the models inside are really attractive, and the free tour gives very little basis for knowing what the photosets will look like.
|
12-19-08 03:01pm
|
Reply
2145
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Poll
I voted for "one of my siblings".
That is based on my guess that Playboy magazine is/was considered porn. The Playboy magazines belonged to my older brother.
Actually, I was wondering whether Playboy is considered porn by this thread. That was before I read Drooler's reply, where he questioned whether Playboy is porn (proof that great minds do think alike).
If Playboy is not considered porn, then my vote should have been "No-one, I'm stealthy ".
|
12-19-08 06:00am
|
Reply
2146
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Esteemed Khan,
Yes, it's true I currently have 4 live tickets.
I am battling my way to my first raffle win, date unknown, when I will gratefully clutch the filthy green.
But before I had 4 live tickets, I had 0 live tickets. And when I went to the PU page:
https://www.pornusers.com/raffle_user.html
it showed I had 0 live tickets, with "3 chances to win".
Now I have 4 live tickets, and the page:
https://www.pornusers.com/raffle_user.html
shows "(You have 4 of 44 live tickets, 3 chances to win)"
It's no big deal, but there is no way the 3 chances to win could be accurate for 0 live tickets. And I doubt that it is accurate with 4 live tickets, because 4 tickets would represent 4 chances to win, not 3 chances.
Like I say, no big deal. You might want someone to fix/update the software that controls the printout on the page, or not. This is a very minor detail.
I was trying to be witty.
|
12-19-08 05:47am
|
Reply
2147
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I voted "No" on whether PU had too many redundant threads.
I would also like to vote for a new pollster/mathematician/odds maker for PU.
I was not great at math.
But when PU tells me, that I have 0 of 22 live tickets, with 3 chances to win the raffle, I know something is not right.
With 0 tickets, how can I have 3 chances to win?
I know I'm handsome, smart, and charming, but am I so incredibly lucky that I am worth 3 chances to win when I hold 0 tickets?
|
12-18-08 09:50am
|
Reply
2148
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
This is a great chance for PU staff members to soak up their free time.
They can review each thread and pick the best submissions on each one, then start a new uber thread with the best possible, most informative and witty ideas und answers.
I kind of admire almost all the posts by lk2fireone. He's someone I really respect.
|
12-17-08 05:16am
|
Reply
2149
|
3D Lesbian
(0)
|
Reply of
biker's Review
Great first review. Lots of fine details.
I never realized how many varieties of porn there were. I sincerely doubt I will be able to sample all the kinds that look attractive to me while I'm still alive. Lol.
I'm sure there are perverts out there planning even better versions of porn. With real touchy-feely-smelly qualities for the computer age.
|
12-14-08 12:38pm
|
Reply
2150
|
Mature Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Just as an aside, the reason given for lack of zipped photosets at Glamdeluxe is basically the same reason messmer said was given by this webmaster: fear of piracy.
Fear of piracy does not make a lot of sense to me, as a reason to not include zip files. Is a pirate going to refuse to download pictures from a web site from some sense of honor or horror because there are no zipped files?
But different people believe different things. That's life. It's certainly easier to have zip files on a site, and most sites I've joined have them.
Maybe if enough members complain, or--to put it more politely--suggest that zip files would be an important feature, that might make a difference to some web sites.
But we don't control the world. Not even the porn sites that we have joined.
|
12-13-08 09:56am
|
