| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
251
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I'd prefer subtitles too, but mainly because I want to hear the actual performers fucking. If they dubbed dialogue scenes and kept the actual sex noises, I'd be okay with that.
|
07-18-10 12:29am
|
Reply
252
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
What?
|
07-17-10 10:53pm
|
Reply
253
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
They actually did the same exact thing last July for a couple weeks. I think there was even a comment about it here. The price drop, I think, is just something they do every couple months to stir up new members.
Added: Yeah, here's the comment, and it's literally a year ago yesterday.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=37418
|
07-15-10 06:35pm
|
Reply
254
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
"Anal unit of measure". I like that, and think I may have to use it sometime. And as far as that ratio, the ratio overall right now is about 250 anal scenes to about 3500 scenes, or 1 out of every 14 scenes. The last 19 weeks or so is about 1 out of every 17 to 19. It's a drop, but I don't know how significant that is, and they've never really been much of an anal site anyway.
|
07-13-10 09:00pm
|
Reply
255
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Actually, early to middle of last year is when the content was feeling the effects of the economy. Right now, it just is what it is. And as far as I know, the $10 deal is $10 recurring at $25, which is more expensive than the PU deal if you plan on sticking around for more than one month.
|
07-13-10 04:45pm
|
Reply
256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Poll
I don't have enough time or money to pay for a site as an impulse. I check the tour get an idea of whether or not I like the content, and if I do, I put it on a short list of sites to join in the future. Honestly, so far, I've only joined one of the sites on that list.
|
06-28-10 02:21am
|
Reply
257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I also have Adblock Plus, so I also don't see them. But they don't really bother me on a well designed website, because they are placed in ways that I can just ignore them.
|
06-24-10 02:30am
|
Reply
258
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I've seen it get as high as 2Mb/s, but it usually hangs around 1.1 to 1.5.
|
05-29-10 02:41am
|
Reply
259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
1024x768
|
04-04-10 12:43am
|
Reply
260
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Dirty is almost an understatement when it comes to Amy Brooke. She's only been around for like 6-8 months, and she's already filmed at least one double anal scene. She's really hardcore, and I'm kinda surprised they stopped at a BJ with her.
|
03-21-10 10:31am
|
Reply
261
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Reply
Redbox is rumored to be testing Blu-Ray rentals in select areas right now. I forget what the price is, though.
|
03-21-10 12:04am
|
Reply
262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
Ditto. And mine plays PS2 and PS1 games too. Most versatile piece of electronics I have.
|
03-20-10 10:35am
|
Reply
263
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
In a car. Entirely too cramped, much more so than a shower.
|
03-14-10 09:49pm
|
Reply
264
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I expect that most porn orgasms are fake. Which is why I apply willful suspension of disbelief. As long as I can make myself reasonably believe it could be real, then I'm fine. Though I've seen more than a few women who go so over the top that they even pierce that.
|
03-06-10 01:07pm
|
Reply
265
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
A-freaking-men. I'd actually like to start a slow clap for this comment, that's how much I like it.
|
02-28-10 09:57pm
|
Reply
266
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Definitely a new computer, probably a new phone. Computer's actually broken, phone is getting "long in the tooth".
|
02-26-10 07:59am
|
Reply
267
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I think we can pretty much agree on that.
|
02-25-10 09:01pm
|
Reply
268
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
To me, the main difference between the two companies is that one company (Brazzers) seems to only shoot models with large (and usually fake) breasts to the point of excluding popular models with real breasts. The other company (Naughty America) doesn't care about the breast size of the model, and just shoots who they think fits the theme/who the members want. And, from having been around for a long time, I can tell you that generally, the models with fake breasts tend to get requested more than the models with real breasts. I feel like they still make a concerted effort to bring natural women around (usually at least one per day on the Live shows, and at least 3-4 scenes per week). Could the ratio be better? Honestly, I do think so. But, judging by the general reaction on their forums, this seems to be what the members want. And I'm not gonna begrudge them for giving the members what they want.
|
02-24-10 07:45pm
|
Reply
269
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I don't think it's an inherently bad idea. I think some girls can make it work, and some can't. I think some go overboard, and some don't. I take it all on a case-by-case basis. Some of my favorite girls have boob jobs (Eva Angelina), some don't (Tori Black). And I think that nowadays, the decision by some girls to get implants is as much a business decision as it is an aesthetic one. Because, from most of the things I've noticed, girls with big boobs (whether real or fake) get more shoots than girls with small ones, especially when it comes to porn made in California (Valley Porn, as it's called). And with companies shooting less because of the economy, you have to do what you can to get shoots.
|
02-24-10 07:19pm
|
Reply
270
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
They're not going back on anything. It was a bug. They've always allowed negative comments, and unless they are abnormally mean, they pretty much always stay up.
And I completely disagree with your second statement, but that's neither here nor there, and a topic better left to another thread.
|
02-23-10 07:32pm
|
Reply
271
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
http://tour.naughtyamerica.com/scenes/raquel-sieb/7619/?&nats=MTI1NDIzOjQ6OA,0,0,0,0
I have no clue if that is the scene you commented on, but that should answer anyone's questions as to whether they consistently censor negative comments/reviews.
|
02-23-10 02:49am
|
Reply
272
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
That happens sometimes. Really, comments on scenes going missing and coming back isn't a new thing. And it happens with good and bad ones (I only make positive comments, and I've had it happen to me). If there's one definite fly in the ointment there, it's the tech issues that have been popping up over the last few months. None of them are deal-breaking, per se, but you do notice them, and they can get to be annoying.
|
02-22-10 10:28am
|
Reply
273
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Because I'm a fan of Live content, my favorite site gives me a reason to stay around for months on end. That being said, I've cancelled twice, once because I had no money, and once to get the PU discount for them.
|
02-18-10 01:16am
|
Reply
274
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
Addicted's Comment
From what I know, the site is DRM free, and they update it about once a week, but they have content from as far back as 2005, so some of it is a little old.
Also, it looks like it costs $10 to $20 per scene, not $30. Still pretty damn high, though.
|
02-11-10 01:27pm
|
Reply
275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Technically, every answer in this poll that isn't yes is no. The question is which no did you choose? That makes it a kinda weird poll, to be honest.
|
02-10-10 02:21pm
|
