| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Tons. I have a decent amount of free time and a large amount of channels, so I can usually find something to watch.
|
12-28-12 07:47am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
You're all a bunch of Scrooges.
|
12-25-12 06:32pm
|
Reply
78
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
It might have something to do with when you signed up, because over the past month they've had a $5.00 special (right now, but just started), a $7.95 special(over the US Thanksgiving holiday weekend), and a $9.99 special(last week). So it could be that the PU discount wasn't working and they gave you their special price instead (as opposed to purely regional pricing).
|
12-22-12 12:11pm
|
Reply
79
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
For many people here, I can see how it would feel like a large percentage. But the more I look around at other sites, the more I don't think it's seems like that much to a majority of the market. And, like you said, compared to most American porn sites that aren't specifically trying to focus on young and/or natural girls, it really isn't. They all seem to live somewhere between 30/70 and 70/30, as far as the fake to natural ratio goes, and the bigger the site, the more likely it is to fall on the 70/30 side of that spectrum. And if you stick to just the young sites on this network (for example, just My Sister's Hot Friend/Naughty Bookworms/Fast Times), you end up with a ratio around 85/15 natural to fake, and about 2-3 scenes a week (120 so far this year over 50 weeks). And for the most part, even if you completely ignored the updates with implants and pretended they didn't exist, you'd still have a site that posts somewhere between 4-8 updates every week.
I can definitely understand someone like messmer's issue, where he's specifically looking for older natural women and the majority of the most popular American mature models have implants, so he's not gonna be able to find much that he likes. But, like I was kind of trying to say, to say something along the lines of it being difficult to find natural models at all almost goes beyond hyperbole into saying something that is flat out incorrect.
Also, as an aside, why did you bring up the large breasted natural women? I don't understand it in the context of this discussion.
|
12-21-12 10:01pm
|
Reply
80
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I apologize for going a little overboard. It's just a pet peeve of mine when people say things that can be proven incorrect with a little bit of research (and not just here, anywhere). When I first read your post, because you included Faye Reagan, I assumed that the post was talking about all women, and not just the older ones. Because the older ones skew fake, and the younger ones skew natural, if you look at the whole site, it does end up being about 50/50. And that's not an assumption, you can see it using their tagging system (click the porn finder link at the top of the page, and on the right hand side is a list of all the tags they use and the numbers across all the sites).
|
12-20-12 09:33pm
|
Reply
81
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
It looks like it re-bills at a price higher than the normal subscription price, though, so if someone's going to do this, they're gonna want to make sure they cancel after before the next billing cycle.
|
12-20-12 02:55pm
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The slightly more of having days off is negated by the slightly less of having more people around, so about the same.
|
12-20-12 01:21pm
|
Reply
83
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I said this to someone else, and I'll say it again: Half. They're basically half-natural and half-fake as a whole.
I realize that may not be enough for your tastes, but to act like natural breasts are a rare occurrence just isn't correct.
Edit: unless you're talking about ONLY mature models, and even then it's rare but not impossible to find.
|
12-20-12 01:04pm
|
Reply
84
|
Best Hard Hunks
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
Well, technically, since you aren't paying, they're not giving you bad customer service for your money.
But I do agree about there being a large amount of websites out there that need better previews.
|
12-17-12 05:10pm
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, because I don't need a physical DVD to be able to watch things on my TV, and I'd rather have portable hard drives as backups.
|
12-16-12 02:58am
|
Reply
86
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Money rules everything. If enough people are still joining from the affected countries, then it doesn't matter if a few people are complaining.
|
12-15-12 10:36am
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
That depends entirely on how old you are and the type of people you associate with. A 22 year old living in a college/university town is much more likely to run into a teen than they are a MILF.
That being said, I feel like this poll, more than almost any other that isn't explicitly asking how old everyone is, shows that that the members tend to be on the older side (not that that's a bad thing at all). While I'm not young enough that the girls playing teenagers in porn (who, while some are 18-19, are usually around 20-23) would be my contemporaries, I'm nowhere near old enough that it would be unlikely that a woman that old would want to sleep with me. For me, it's about watching attractive women, no matter what age they are or what age I am.
|
12-14-12 09:15pm
|
Reply
88
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
The name is Lesbian Girl on Girl, not 1 on 1. It's a fairly bad name, if I'm being honest, but the content looks okay.
|
12-13-12 07:43pm
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never have, never will.
|
12-10-12 08:51am
|
Reply
90
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Comment
Working alright for me, though it takes a minute to get used to it.
|
12-08-12 11:34am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
alexbrawn's Poll
3 days of streaming but no downloads (for video sites). That sounds about right.
|
12-08-12 01:33am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I would argue that having it password encrypted makes it hidden, as you'd have to know the password to see it.
|
12-06-12 12:28pm
|
Reply
93
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
Belthazar's Reply
You know, that's not a bad idea at all.
|
12-04-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
There's definitely some very good porn coming out of Europe, but I don't think anywhere beats the variety of women I can find in American porn.
|
12-02-12 12:08am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I want to say it's a combination of quality of content, amount of content, and frequency of content. And the truth is that I haven't yet found more than 1 site that makes me want to stay a member for more than one month. The sites that have come closest, though, only missed on the frequency part.
|
11-30-12 08:08am
|
Reply
96
|
My Sister's Hot Friend
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I've been a member for about 4 years now (it's my only standing membership to any site), so I've come to know a lot about it. I'm probably a bigger fan of them than anyone that posts here. And I know they have their flaws (and quite a few of them), but I tend to want to correct people when they post things that are flat out not correct.
And if you look, while 1800 are tagged as natural, only 1781 are tagged as fake, so there's obviously a bunch of scenes that aren't tagged as either one. And going by the tags, like I said, it's about 50/50.
|
11-29-12 05:15pm
|
Reply
97
|
My Sister's Hot Friend
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
This isn't necessarily in regards to you, but something that bugs me about quite a few people on this site:
You say that "most of the girls have boob jobs". That's not true. It might be true for Naughty America as a whole (I'd argue that for the whole network it's fairly close to 50/50, but I can see how people would construe that as "most" since it's close to the majority). But for this site in particular, the balance shifts much more towards natural than it does fake. Of the last 20 updates, only 4 featured fake breasts. Of the last 100, only 22. That's not most at all.
|
11-28-12 08:32pm
|
Reply
98
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
As far as I know (and I know a couple people that have paid for videos), they are trustworthy with your info.
As for the prices, this is what videos cost if you want something specific that isn't necessarily "mainstream".
|
11-28-12 06:52pm
|
Reply
99
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
As for reasons for segmented downloads even today:
Some people might only want to watch a certain part of the scene (i.e. just the blowjob, or just the popshot, or just one sex position), and if that's all you want to see you can save bandwidth by just downloading one part of the scene.
|
11-25-12 10:36pm
|
Reply
100
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I joined this site a few months ago for a month (and even wrote a review on it).
As far as comparing the two sites, I think that Reality Kings has more variety (both ethnically with their Round and Brown site, and in the fact that they shoot in Europe, Florida, and California so they have a wider variety of women). But I generally preferred the navigation at Naughty America (I know some people have trouble with it, but if you know that many of the pages are controlled by JavaScript and that the back button will take you to the last page you loaded, and not the last page in the list you were thumbing through, then I find it really easy to get around), and I don't really like the pseudo-reality setups that many of RKs sites use. So I would say that I prefer Naughty America, but not by that much.
|
11-21-12 06:01pm
|
