| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
I guess the etiquette on these e-mail deals is to say, "Check your e-mail - you might have gotten an offer too" as opposed to posting links.
Fine by me. Once I know an offer exists, they can almost always be found. And this was a nice one.
|
10-29-10 05:36pm
|
Reply
452
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Sure do - it was weird how I happened on this. I received an e-mail about that fake story by a paparazzi about how Tila Tequila had invaded his house and kidnapped Shyla Jennings at gunpoint - it pointed to a link showing Shyla as a MetArt model. I clicked on it, since it seemed to come from Met Art and there was the offer.
|
10-28-10 05:18am
|
Reply
453
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks for clarifying.
|
10-24-10 10:32am
|
Reply
454
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Some comments pertain to pricing deals or inclusion of bonus sites that are announced on the home page or site's tour - I have put many such comments - and I don't see why they would not be appropriate. Of course, if an offered deal doesn't turn out to be followed through on once someone has joined, I would hope that they would also make a comment.
I recently made a comment about New Sensation's tour having navigation that failed in every possible way. If a site is going to set up a tour, they should have links that work, rather than crash and I'll continue to make such remarks, because if the navigation on the tour crashes, I have absolutely no reason to believe that the site itself will function, so I'll spend my money elsewhere.
|
10-24-10 10:31am
|
Reply
455
|
Secretease
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
You're really complaining about $1 difference due to currency conversion? To be fair, a site would be hard pressed to get the costs closer given the ups and downs of currency conversion.
|
10-24-10 10:23am
|
Reply
456
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
I'm with Rusty in disagreeing with such a low score for navigation problems - but then a lot of the solo-girl model sites have haphazard navigation that makes this network look like complete and utter genius, so it's clearly not the most important thing on my list.
They don't have good navigation and you have to click away to get to a list of all scenes for a particular model and then trying to connect the Photo Samples with a particular scene is another bunch of work. I haven't experienced the problems with the back button for some reason - maybe I just never hit it.
My score for this site and network would be about 40 points higher than yours, regardless of the navigation - which is not good and ought to be made much better.
|
10-22-10 07:04am
|
Reply
457
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
It's the same haphazard posting of vids that they have been doing for some time with no explanation or rhyme or reason. Every once in a while they post vids that can be downloaded in 1080p, but it's never been consistent.
|
10-20-10 06:54am
|
Reply
458
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Actually, I'm a big fan of really crappy infomercials - like the ones for Extenze. If I won the lottery and had lots of money to play with, I'd make fake infomercials. They're freaking hilarious.
|
10-17-10 03:08pm
|
Reply
459
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I can just picture the ad now - the guy walks downstairs, starts to walk into the kitchen, where his girlfriend is chatting with her bff's, stops short and listens from outside the door as his gf's friend commiserates - "Only 12 inches? I don't understand how you stay with him! You must be some kind of saint!" Her other friends laugh, one of them says, "Exactly! We're going to put you up for beatification right now!"
Shot of the guy looking all hang-dog and embarrassed.
The sexy 38-dd spokeswoman says, "Tired of being embarrassed with your mini-12-incher? Well, we've got the solution for you! Get-a-yard! With Get-a-Yard, you'll be able to grow your tool so big you can satisfy even the most demanding woman - maybe a woman like me!"
The male announcer in a staccato voice - Get-a-Yard - available now for only $99.95 for one month's dosage - not-recommended-for-males-between-the-ages-of-12-200-may-cause-heart-attacks-impotence-loss-of-digestive-functions-loss-of-eyesight-schizophrenia-in-most-individuals.
Sexy female 38-dd swinginging her tits into the camera says "Get-a-yard! Why wait?"
|
10-16-10 04:32pm
|
Reply
460
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Yeah, Nubiles is a site that I'm a member of for at least one 4-month period per year and it's quite a solid, enjoyable site - doesn't have that extra intangible oomph of personality to make me want to stay a member non-stop, for some reason, but it's quite a nice site with lots of great material that just keeps coming every day.
|
10-15-10 04:40am
|
Reply
461
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I did a couple of 90 day memberships at Karups PC and Karups HA - one after the other recently. While I find myself more excited by ATK's material, mainly because they accentuate the differences between their content providers more than Karups does, Karups sites are quite solid with lots to enjoy. I believe that I enjoyed Karups PC a tad more than Karups HA, but the fun of HA, having never been a member before, was seeing early work of so many fave babes.
|
10-12-10 05:45pm
|
Reply
462
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I generally find Freeones or Peachy Forum the best places to search for work by a particular model - or one can always google the name of the model and a particular site if you're not sure if she's worked there - that often brings up a link where you can get the name she worked under on that site.
|
10-10-10 07:51am
|
Reply
463
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ace DDF's Reply
Sure - I go into the DDF Prod website, I click on the red border on top of a Euro Teen Erotica pic and vid set and there in the upper left hand corner is a pic of the home page of EuroTeenErotica saying "3 Exclusive Updates Every Week" - I'm looking at it as I type - well, actually, I look at it - then type - then look at it again - then type some more.
|
10-06-10 06:42pm
|
Reply
464
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Rob12's Comment
It depends what you want from this site - if you want the site to do a lot of work for you, helping you find what you want - yeah, it ain't going to do that.
If you like the recent updates and you want to explore individual director's materials, you can do that reasonably well with this site and be able to download what you want.
|
10-04-10 08:10pm
|
Reply
465
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Sites vary considerably. I've experienced sites that answered within a couple of minutes. I've experienced sites that I had to hunt down across the internet. One of the worst was joining Stephanie Swift's site years ago. She had some kind of "key"/password thing that didn't work for anybody. She had no help on the site and couldn't deal with it herself, so she didn't. Then she got upset that most of the posts on the forum were negative - cause people were paying money for nothing. I had to hunt down the guy who had worked on the web design, found a phone # for his company, gave him my info and he used his back-door that he was using to do the web design work to get me access.
On the other hand, Shap at Twisty's passed on a dinner with a porn babe to help resolve a problem where their new anti-hacker software had blocked me along with another Comcast customer's ISP because the other guy was some asshole hacker trying to rip them off.
|
10-04-10 07:11pm
|
Reply
466
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
lostdutchman's Comment
Also be aware that Brazzers still has download restrictions on their most high-res vids. I believe the current policy is this: You have to be a member for 6 months or join for a full year in order to download the 1080p vids. You can download the 720p vids in your first month of membership now, I believe.
If you would be disappointed to NOT be able to download the highest res vids right away, I recommend e-mailing Brazzers - or going on their forum for clarification - before joining.
|
10-02-10 06:37am
|
Reply
467
|
Premium Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
one big problem with this network is the bait-and-switch aspect of the live shows since they have started going through Streamate, which is becoming an increasingly popular option, being used by other sites, such as ILoveLupe.com, WickedPictures.com...
Having seen live shows for no additional charges at those other sites, I know that the people who run these sites CAN set things up so that their site members can watch a live show at no charge at the same time that non-members can join the show through Streamate or one of their many mirror sites at a pay-per-minute deal.
Well, in this network, aside from the noteable exception of Jenna Haze, I haven't seen a performer on this network that enables this network's members to view the live shows at no charge - anybody that wants to view the shows has to do so at pay-per-minute charges.
If that were stated before you joined the network, I'd say it was greedy but honest. Since the live shows are promoted as free to members before you join the network, I have absolutely no respect for the bait-and-switch bitches, such as Tori Black, that have set things up so their site's members have no free access to their live shows. If they have no respect for me, I have no reason to have any respect for them.
|
10-01-10 06:26am
|
Reply
468
|
VSex
(0)
|
Reply of
drewdarko's Review
A few comments - no mention of price in this review. While you can watch and chat with the performers between privates - and some of them will dance or do sexy stuff - it's all about the private sessions where the customers get to use the remote-controlled fucking machine on the performers.
The cost for that ranges from $7.00/minute (most of the performers) to $10/minute (that's Amy Brooke's price) and I believe they require a minimum of 5 minute private shows so the performers aren't going to the trouble of getting on the fucking machine and having the customers come at the sight of a bare pussy and end the show after 2 minutes.
They also have a voyeur option where you can watch a private show, but have no control over the fucking machine, for $2.50-$3/minute depending on the performer.
My biggest gripe in checking out this site a number of times is the inaccuracy of "Online" being noted. I've seen "Online" being noted when a performer is saying on her twitter that she'll be there in a few hours. "I'll be there in 3 hours" and "Online" are not the same thing to me - but they are to this site. I've seen performers say "Good night" to everyone in the room and then seen them continue to be listed as "Online" long after that point.
This is a factor of them needing more performers and filling out the list with performers that will be there and performers that were there earlier. But that doesn't help customers know who is actually there now. Unless you're following multiple twitter accounts, it's difficult to get that information, the way they currently operate this site.
|
09-18-10 09:13am
|
Reply
469
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Yep - reduced pricing and great content on the site I joined are the key to me sticking around if I were going to leave in the first place.
ALS Scan just ensured that I'll continue with my ALS Angels discount membership by posting preview pics of an upcoming babe.
|
09-16-10 06:46am
|
Reply
470
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
The questions are:
1) Is Vivid any value to you at all?
2) What's the quality that you're looking for?
3) What Evil Angel directors are you most interested in?
If you're looking for the highest quality, then the quality of Evil Angel vids at Videobox is higher than the quality of the vids at EvilAngel.com.
Another option is the network centered around Buttman.com, which has very high quality vids available - they claim HD - and a significant amount of web-only material. They also have fucking hideous navigation, so finding the web-only material is a chore and a half.
If you're looking for Rocco's stuff - and Rocco's new work is excellent - you are only going to find that at EvilAngel.com.
|
09-14-10 05:51pm
|
Reply
471
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
I've been a member of this site, jsexnetwork and Actionjav, all of which have significant amounts of Maria O material.
Actionjav.com only has censored (mosaic) material. Both jsexnetwork and this site have uncensored material.
It's very easy to browse Jsexnetwork's site as a non-member to see what they have - and they have a lot. I recommend that site far and away above Idol69 for 3 reasons:
1) Overall, it's a more professional site. When I was a member of Idol69 for 1 month, I didn't have access for multiple days. I got NO help from the C/S at this site, just BS answers like "nobody else is having a problem, must be your fault"
2) The material at Idol69 is ALL clips - no whole DVD's at all on the entire site.
3) Besides the vids at Jsexnetwork's site, they also have some really nice soft-core photo sets - it's like the cherry on top.
|
09-14-10 05:45pm
|
Reply
472
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't even think there is a "we, as a society"
I don't see the "we"
There are tremendous segments of the population that couldn't possibly look at things differently than I do. The popularity of mega-churches, Rush Limbaugh, the 700 Club, Glen Beck - and I could go on and on - all point to a huge portion of the population that I feel completely apart from and there is no "we" in terms of "our" perspective on nudity - or a whole hell of a lot of other things.
|
09-12-10 07:16am
|
Reply
473
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I've seen some extraordinary bj scenes. In fact when I had a membership to the DDF network, I thought the material at Only Blowjobs was highly erotic.
Any sexual act can be boring in person or on vid - it depends on how it's presented.
|
09-11-10 04:07pm
|
Reply
474
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Tease is the key element to any material that is trying to be sexy. Can there be fully nude tease? Absolutely! Face close-ups with models that know how to use their eyes, mouths, tongues - mmmmm - tongues!!!! - can be great tease material.
And then there's leg, boob and ass tease - mmmmmm - the possibilities are endless. To ignore them shows that the people producing the material have no imagination, creativity or talent.
|
09-10-10 06:56am
|
Reply
475
|
VSex
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
Here's what's fucked up about this site. You never know which performers are really there. I suspect that they inflate the "Online" numbers by having extra performers that left long ago as still "online" where you click on them and get that "This performer just finished a private show and will be right back" message. I was just cruising over there because the gorgeous Addison O'Reilly was listed as being online and I wanted to check her out, kept getting that message.
So I checked out Darcy something-or-other for a few minutes. She was chatting with the guys in the free chat, said her "goodnight"s and "have a good weekend" and "I'm taking off now". When she immediately signed off, the message was "This session has ended". As soon as I went to the home page and clicked again on her "online" button, the message was "This performer just finished a private show and will be right back".
Who is REALLY online on this site? I don't think there's really a way to tell unless you catch the babe there.
|
09-09-10 08:05pm
|
