| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
426
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've joined sites that announced they were no longer updating the day after I joined - or stopped updating with no announcement. Or I had no access.
In those situations, I requested refunds.
|
12-05-10 04:57pm
|
Reply
427
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah, I have great affection for ATK - they are my antidote for how freaking disgusted I get at all the overly-photoshopped sites out there - but the navigation at ATK petites is crazed and the stability of their sites is not good and shows no signs of improving over time.
|
12-05-10 08:33am
|
Reply
428
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Read the webmaster's reply to another comment on this page as to which method will get you a response - because some inquiry methods generate no responses whatsoever - aside from an automated response that you'll be getting a response quickly. They need to fix that.
|
12-04-10 04:50pm
|
Reply
429
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
Then please eliminate the other "fill-out-the-form" feature, which USED to generate timely responses and no longer does.
Your members should not have to be mind-readers to know which forms one has to fill out to get a response this week.
|
12-04-10 04:47pm
|
Reply
430
|
ATK Petites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
ATK's system is as un-stable as 21st Sextury's - sometimes worse. Both companies need to get their shit more together in that way.
The issues that you are describing of gateway timeouts is not at all uncommon with all of the ATK sites.
They just need to fucking fix it.
|
12-04-10 04:43pm
|
Reply
431
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'm sure it goes on - in fact there are sites where the owner/webmaster/photographer brags about it. But the cool sites are run by pros that treat their models well and get great material from them because they're not all anxious about being taken advantage of.
The material on the other sites sucks shit because the only reason the assholes are running the sites is so that the losers can fuck their models.
|
12-04-10 04:41pm
|
Reply
432
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
More like Twisty's with Tunnel Vision
|
12-02-10 08:12pm
|
Reply
433
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I went for "Roughneck & Jerking Around" because it "sounds" the most abusive.
I like rough consensual scenes. A lot of women like a certain amount of rough sex - they like being man-handled, they like being grabbed at the throat, they like light slapping, most sexual woman love being spanked hard if it's in the right place - they like the excitement of feeling like a man is mad for them.
But there's a line - and I witnessed it clearly when I saw stuff on Clara G's site - where it goes from exciting consensual sex to abusive bull-shit - and as a fan of rough sex, I feel that I have the responsibility in watching it to have my radar on very high. I hate the shit that went on between Raul what-ever-his-name-is and Clara G. It was the porn equivalent of Ike and Tina Turner - it wasn't sexy. You could see it in her flinching before she would paste on an "Oh-ha-ha-ha" smile.
That's the shit I absolutely hate.
As to the choking - it's definitely true that if it's going to be done, it needs to be done carefully and skillfully. I like women being grabbed by the throat. I don't like women being choked, because most porn guys don't know what the fuck they're doing. There's a scene that Madison Ivy did for Brazzers with Keiran Lee - "Sexaholic" on the "Pornstars Like It Big" site in their network. Keiran is choking Madison and she pretty clearly falls over unconscious. There's an edit and the scene goes on. They probably both figured it was all in a day's work and both have continued to work for Brazzers, but that's not safe - far from it.
|
11-30-10 05:58pm
|
Reply
434
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Good to know - Thanks, Khan
|
11-30-10 05:36pm
|
Reply
435
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Well-done review, as usual.
My big con in regard to this site - too damned specific - the "now we're going to do a scene devoted to the puckering of her asshole" stuff just does away with any element of surprise and adventure that, to me, is what eroticism is all about.
It's the same issue that I have with Kink.com.
It's very subjective, because there are certainly sites I like that are predictable and usually rather repetitive, but they have enough variety within that repetition and predictability that they don't kill the eroticism, and despite the high quality of this site, for my tastes, they just do - way too much of the time.
It's why I like the tendencies of ALS Scan to try different things - like a bit of b/g (I haven't liked it on their site) or fem-dom (I fucking love the fem-dom stuff on their site!). Even when they don't succeed, it's clear they're trying to get somewhere new. The specificity of sites like In The Crack and the Kink.com sites mean that they'll NEVER get anywhere that they didn't specifically plot out to begin with.
|
11-30-10 12:34am
|
Reply
436
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
IE is by far the shittiest, most glitchy, most hospitable to virus-makers, so I've been using it less and less - Firefox and Chrome for me
|
11-21-10 05:30pm
|
Reply
437
|
88 Square
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
FYI - TheBlackAlley.com has the archives of the old Asian4You site, is run by the same people, they're still doing lots of new work in that same heavily lacquered fashion.
|
11-17-10 11:02pm
|
Reply
438
|
Butt Man
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
It looks like they have contracted with the same people that have been doing Devil's Film's site and have been doing EvilAngel.com for a while to do this site. It makes it had to distinguish this network from that one, which has been a problem since EvilAngel.com started. I don't know why they want both at this point.
|
11-16-10 11:40pm
|
Reply
439
|
Tania Spice
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for the review of this site. I've thought about joining it, because she has such an exciting bod, but I wasn't sure whether it's updating or not.
I think your conclusions that she is long gone are correct, given that the newer vids are poorer resolution.
I hadn't noticed the add-on deal to get this site through Pacino's Adventures. I'll have to check this out.
This site is also available as a bonus if you join one of Pacino's newest sites - Ivy something-or-other. But Ivy hasn't excited me.
Karla Spice is still my fave of Pacino's models - and she's gone - getting married and only looking for fashion model work under the name Karla Lopez.
|
11-16-10 06:04am
|
Reply
440
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
It depends - shitty BTS scenes are shitty, good BTS scenes are good. I like seeing the personalities of hot babes if they're fun. ALS Scan has great BTS stuff. Many sites do not. John Stagliano was doing live shows for a short while at Buttman.com and they went back & forth between staged elements and BTS elements pretty constantly - which is what gonzo is really all about, though it's been distorted to mean rough sex these days. Anyway, that stuff was very fun and interesting and erotic and exciting - like performances with no net can be when the people involved are all into it.
|
11-15-10 05:56pm
|
Reply
441
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Since this poll question and the choices are in complete contradiction, the whole thing really makes no sense, therefore my choice is to poke a hole in the dimensional rift and put my porn collection on the other side of the dimensional divide.
|
11-13-10 05:06pm
|
Reply
442
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I took no offense, Denner. It's not my site. I have no control of the regional pricing issue. It's just a deal that some might be interested.
As to other people's comments about "nobody has friends that would want this", I think that's un-true. I'm sure there are people that talk to their friends openly about their taste in porn sites, just as there are guys that go with their friends to strip clubs.
|
11-13-10 09:31am
|
Reply
443
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
I recently had a computer virus attack that wound up completely disabling my ability to get on the internet or download any types of security updates that would have been able to deal with it.
I hadn't been using external HD's for my collection - plus virtually all my "favorites" are porn-related.
The older Asian guy that fixed it for me was completely non-plussed by my porn - when I picked it up he was gleefully flipping through my favorites to show how good the navigation now was.
But I did learn the lesson - the pros use external HD's. There's just too many people with their own agendas out there for it to really be safe otherwise.
|
11-05-10 06:51am
|
Reply
444
|
My Glamour Site
(0)
|
Reply of
dalars's Review
I liked this site more than you did. Lots of hot Euro-babes, including the amazing Nella.
Do you know if Nella's site, ClubNella, is still a bonus site when you join this site. The site doesn't say that it is, though Club Nella says that MSG is a bonus site if you join - but the join price is $10/month more.
|
11-04-10 07:50am
|
Reply
445
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Traveler's Comment
When I have been on Babelicious, I have often found that Twisty's had the same material posted earlier - and it would have been one of their multiple posts that day, unlike Babelicious.
Twistys also posts a fair amount of Exclusive material, unlike Babelicious.
|
11-03-10 05:47pm
|
Reply
446
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
Actually both those new models - Fayina and Anushka - have pages at the Euro Babe Index - I only know because a member at the Nubiles forum is pretty dedicated to keep up with such things. I can't remember what name they are under there.
But yes, this is a great site for lovers of hot young babes. There's an ebb and flow as far as the excellence of the new models - there have been period where I have looked at the updates and thought - pass, pass, pass - for periods of time. But that's fine, really - the fact that the site has such clear info as to its updates is one of the great things about it - I rejoin when I feel like I have to.
And being a lover of hot young brunettes, the 2 babes you mentioned got me to rejoin as soon as I set my eyes on them - and I don't regret it one bit.
As to the socks and "young" clothes - well, it is called Nubiles, after all. It's a themed site and the outfits go with the theme. Personally, it's a theme I'm into and I love the over-the-knee sock look.
The thing this site has gotten much better about is being able to engage the models with the shoots. I was very disappointed with that aspect in my first join. Shoot after shoot, the models - while being very hot - looked they were bored to tears. Whatever they've done to address this has worked quite well and I haven't seen that issue on subsequent subscriptions to the site.
|
11-01-10 05:47pm
|
Reply
447
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
That error report/comment is what I was referring to. Is it still there? I checked yesterday and just now as well and didn't see it, thought it had been discarded.
I'm glad it's still there - proved accurate now, I believe, by the new reviews here of all of the bonus sites, which have been confirmed as dead - no longer updating for months - or years, in a number of cases.
|
11-01-10 05:37pm
|
Reply
448
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Are any of the Bonus Sites updating at all?
The most recent TBP review claimed that more than one bonus site was updating - I sent a note suggesting that they re-check that since some of the sites - such as SexyBabes.tv are obviously not updating as can be seen by the stated dates of last updates and during my last visit, I know for sure that none were updating.
Interestingly, there was no response that I can see to my note on the TBP review. That note is no longer showing and the review hasn't been updated.
Actually, the answer to my question is in the fact that you reviewed all of the other sites in the network, none of which are updating - that's what I thought, so the TBP review is incorrect. It's strange that they just took down my comment and didn't correct their review.
|
10-31-10 05:43pm
|
Reply
449
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
As with many responding here, I would never give a site a score of 100, because there's always something to point out about a site, which doesn't make it a bad site or one not worth joining.
But this is a Porn Users review site and how many restrictions do we really want to put on other reviewers?
"No, you can't score your favorite site 100 because the PU veterans say 'no site is perfect'"
That wouldn't be the way to encourage the largest number of participating reviewers - and I believe that we all win when there are a large number of participating reviewers on this site.
|
10-31-10 07:55am
|
Reply
450
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Here's my take on this. These sites do a lot of different offers. They figure out where the offer is going to be made and to who. They figure out how many people are likely to take the offer and all these things affect their bottom line.
Perhaps the problem with the 2-for-1 deal is that they didn't figure it would get too many hits and that if it was being publicized here, it would get more than they had counted on and be a problem for them, rather than a help of getting new Nubiles customers as their customers. I dunno.
Both Met Art and Nubiles are among my favorite sites. I want them both to do well. If publicizing this offer more broadly than they intended was something they considered to be a problem for them, then I'm glad they took the action they took and that TBP/PU was professional enough to respond promptly to their request.
It's no insult to TBP/PU members and nobody here should take it as one. That's my view.
|
10-29-10 07:48pm
|
