| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Nothing you said had anything to do with the situations I described.
Besides, if only 1% of complaints were legitimate, things would be pretty "bad out there," mmm?
|
12-05-10 04:18am
|
Reply
52
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Review
from tangub:
Interesting looking site...one to bookmark for the future i think when its had time to grow.
|
12-02-10 12:48am
|
Reply
53
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Capn:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I don't. I subscribed once.
I whinge every so often in the hope something might change. ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
11-23-10 03:59pm
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Well, if you really wish to review a recently launched site that has only a smattering of content, be my guest.
As for reasons, I've made mine clear. If you don't get it, well, that's you. JustYou.
And as for your saying this: "I always find it amusing when people try to dictate what *other* people must think of a site, must rate a site," if that's not pot calling the kettle, then I don't know what is!
I mean, are you really THAT self-unaware?
|
11-18-10 12:30pm
|
Reply
55
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from dracken:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
This is awesome! Thank you so much for this info. I knew hustler offered some parodies, but this site is awesome, do you know if you get access to new sensations with this site?
|
11-16-10 01:50pm
|
Reply
56
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Justy so you know, that site is now listed. You can leave your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/parodypass/
|
11-12-10 11:42am
|
Reply
57
|
Secretease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from mbaya:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Hi Justme,
I think you may be misunderstanding why I posted this. I agree this is "piddly stuff". Yes it is small and of course I can pay an extra few cents.
However, my reasons for posting are two: the first is that the webmaster is reading this, as witness a previous posting. If you have someone's ear, take advantage. Most webmasters don't come to PU and post. Regional pricing is a point that is not worth talking about if those who use it don't ever know how customers feel.
That leads to my second reason. If we say nothing we get exactly what we deserve. Complaints here and of course the problems webmasters had in keeping customers got rid of DRM. We can't take all the credit of course, but we have over 10,000 members at PU and probably have at least that many who visit the site and don't join. We have a degree of power. Any webmaster who doesn't care about issues we customers have would lose in the marketplace.
I worked for 35 years in business, mostly in customer service. The squeaky wheel gets the oil. No complaints, business as usual. Complaints may represent a lot more people than the one voice you hear. Most people never complain, they just vote with their pocketbook.
You may not feel that this is worth getting excited about. Yes this is only a few pennies. Most sites are more expensive and regional pricing is dollars more. It is not about the amount, but the principal of the thing.
|
10-24-10 03:15pm
|
Reply
58
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I knew I'd get some negative responses to that one and you haven't let me down, young 'un! :-) I think I made it very clear, except maybe to the very densest, that I was being subjective and that younger folks would find more joy in this site and rated the site accordingly. My outrage (and downgrading) is in connection with totally inadequate videos being published as new updates. And that is NOT subjective, everyone should be outraged no matter how much they enjoy the rest of the material. A quality site just doesn't do that. For me the HD videos (again see review) were the only redeeming factor and now I found out that I can't even count on those on a regular basis.
|
10-20-10 07:19am
|
Reply
59
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Makes sense, though I didn't know Teen Models and Super Glam are owned by Silver Sinema.
After reading this, I looked back at the one video titled Super Glam Vol 1 and the first scene of it is on Teen Models. It's Black Angelica and three other models playing on go-karts and it's in the main section of Teen Models on Black Angelica's page, not the bonus Silver Sinema on Teen Models. The other ones I noticed had Sandra Shine in them, believe the Legal Skin Euro Series, these scenes look like either copies of her content on Super Glam or from the same shoot, different angle. Which Sandra is kind of hard to tell since she has looked almost identical for the last 5-6 years.
That's interesting and ironic though about Teen Models and Super Glam being owned by the same company. I loved Teen Models frequent updates, but the very reason I stopped going to Super Glam was their sporadic updates.
|
10-12-10 05:04am
|
Reply
60
|
Her First Punishment
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
New information! I finally received several e-mail replies at once to my inquiries on this site's cancellation policy.
Like me, it seems this site neglects e-mail for days at a time (nearly a week for my replies) and then gets upset with me for sending so many e-mails when I didn't get timely responses. "You've asked this question three times!"
|
10-08-10 02:39am
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
justme, the poll is supposed to be answered based on your own personal experience. If the first poll selections do not supply the answer you believe applies to you, select the "other" option, and then write in a brief explanation of your response as you already did.
Seems like a fairly simple thing to do. Which you appear to have done already (I am assuming you voted for the "other" option).
|
10-04-10 02:48am
|
Reply
62
|
Her First Punishment
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks so much, justme. It bothers me that they didn't respond to my e-mails, but too often there is little customer service on many web-sites. If inet-cash is legit, I'll try them.
Thanks again!
|
10-02-10 05:28am
|
Reply
63
|
Bikini Pleasure
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Review
from GCode:
I noticed you said the site is softcore posing. Is this as far as the site goes? Meaning, do the models eventually masturbate or anything? Thanks for the review! The tour pretty much describes what you stated but I am just wondering if anything happens outside of posing. These are some tiny bikinis! lol :)
|
09-24-10 07:13pm
|
Reply
64
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from tangub:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I don't think you're ever going to get anyone in Europe to agree that regional pricing is a good thing. Of course if a site is priced in Euros anybody joining from the US is going to love regional pricing because they will be saving $$$. What annoys me more is the blatant false advertising, I recently went to join Querro where on the home page they advertise "sign up now for $19.95" but when i click on join from the UK the price changes to around $24...just a blatant con in my opinion so needless to say i didn't bother.
|
09-24-10 04:17am
|
Reply
65
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
So if the shoe were on the other foot, you would not feel hard done by if you were charged about 40% more than someone accessing the same content just because you happened to live in another country?
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-23-10 03:20pm
|
Reply
66
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from nostromo:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I couldn't disagree more. There are plenty of sites which have never put into practice regional pricing -which is an euphemism for looting- and haven't gone under. I've never been charged the same amonunt of euros by the bangbros network and i've never got my panties in a wad because of that.
|
09-23-10 11:34am
|
Reply
67
|
Boobie Pass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from ace of aces:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
never meant to hurt anyones feelings, it was just a hint.
|
09-16-10 07:23am
|
Reply
68
|
Asian Pervert
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Tom22:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
The site must have reported to "The Best Porn" that it was to be a FULL trial in order for "The Best Porn" to list it as such. And I guess I don't understand what is "disingenuous" about "bashing" a site based on a trial subscription. Especially when they advertised for a Full trial and it appears not to be. Seems to me that in that case, a "bashing" is in order.
|
09-08-10 02:27pm
|
Reply
69
|
Naughty Euro Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I'll let you be the "objective" one. You're good at it.
|
09-08-10 02:32am
|
Reply
70
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Yep, the updates lately are proof of that! I just hadn't expected to see the same scene under a different title only three days later ... which set off above comment.
|
09-05-10 06:13pm
|
Reply
71
|
Elegant Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lone59:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Yeah, it's a major pain in the ass. Like I said, I would tell people to stay as far away as possible, which is a shame since Elegant Angel has some really good material. As good as that material is though, it isnt worth the major pains you can potentially go through, like I did.
|
08-31-10 04:54am
|
Reply
72
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from tangub:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
You seem to be making a good arguement in favour of webmasters who charge customers $30 for content that can be downloaded in a day.
I'm certainly not interested in ripping the whole site in a day as i'm not even remotely interested in the videos which use the highest bandwidth. All i wanted was a collection of her solo photoshoots and at the end of the day i'm paying a premium price at $4.47 for 3 days access compared to around $15 for the whole month so being restricted to such a limited amount of downloads does feel like i've been ripped off. If they had clearly stated that download limits apply then i would have had the choice to either subscribe for the month or not at all, just seems like a shady business practise to me.
It could also be argued that 4 cents per photoset is expensive when compared to sites like MET or ATK where you can download as many as you want in a day.
|
08-30-10 03:26am
|
Reply
73
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I und3erstand the argument completely, but if the site wants to limit the d/l's to 14, then it should say so BEFORE, not after someone signs up.
It's like going to a restaurant offering a second meal free with the purchase of a meal, and once you order, they give you half portions because they can't stay in business if they actually honor their advertised offer.
The rip off is false advertising.
|
08-29-10 05:29pm
|
Reply
74
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from RagingBuddhist:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Flash and Java are up to date here, but I don't think this is a flash or Java issue. Because Pat mentioned having the same issue, I think it's safe to assume that this is a known issue with the site.
|
08-23-10 06:18pm
|
Reply
75
|
Private.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Private:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Hey Justme,
yes, that's actually a new feature on the site. if we have photos available from the scene then they are available.
At the moment I'd say that 99% of the scenes also have the full picture sets available.
|
08-21-10 01:18pm
|
