| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from asmith12:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
> Okay, a site that has a backlog of 500 sets available but no new updates, does it really piss people off having access to _only_ 500 sets instead of 500 plus 5?
No idea about people in general, but yes, it pisses me off. And it is not about 500 vs 500+5, but about three things. The first thing is that if site hasn't been updated for 2 years or so, it can't possibly have stuff in decent quality. The second reason is that sites which are no longer updated, are way too often reselling same old non-exclusive stuff. The third thing is more subtle: if I know that some clip was there for a while, it is not new anymore, and this feeling alone has a chilling effect on me. I feel it is similar to the reason why people are paying BIG money to see a NEW movie as soon as it comes out (while the very same movie will be available for 30% of the price half a year down the road). Illogical? Maybe, but so is whole human nature.
So for me personally, update frequency is very important, and while I still can join a site which doesn't update anymore, if I have any choice, I will prefer site with recent updates.
|
07-21-10 04:52am
|
Reply
77
|
Tainster
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Darrow:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
in order to download any video, you have to buy it. The price of the individual video depends on the membership level that you choose. If you go for the lowest membership level (i.e., you pay nothing monthly and just buy credits) any individual scene would cost $7.50. If you went for a monthly option, the most cost effective would be the VIP level.
It is not just an issue of being cheap; this is outrageously expensive, especially compared to other websites and what eromaxx offered just two months ago.
|
07-14-10 07:34pm
|
Reply
78
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from nadiencendia:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Okay, maybe I wrote the comment in the heat of the moment, it might have been better to cool off before writing it; anyway, I do think it's a scam NOT to say it's a limited trial anywhere, and then offer such limited a content that it's plain ridiculous. Even if there are no laws about it, there are some conventions, and offering 10 incomplete, low-definition scenes for 2.95€, for me qualifies as scam...
Anyway, what I think is important is for other users to know that the trial membership is definitely NOT worth it. If they want to go for the complete 30€ membership, it's up to them, I can't say if the site is any good, because the trial membership didn't allow me to really try it.
Thanks for your views on my comment, anyway, I only hope it's useful for someone...
|
07-14-10 02:43pm
|
Reply
79
|
Lesbian Foot Lover
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from nadiencendia:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Hi, justme, how are you. Yes, I know, this is not the first time I get a trial suscription, and it's not the first time that I find them to be limited (21sextury also had these kind of trial memberships, if I remember correctly); limited trials are always dissapointing, but this is just plain absurd: I don't get to see the size of their archive; the real quality of the videos, or the real download speed. I don't even get to see the faces of the models that work for the site. I am only given access to ONE page with TEN incomplete scenes.
This is not only frustrating for users: it's also a very bad business tactic: if they allowed me to see the names and faces of all their models, a peek of all their scenes (just thumbnails if you want) and some real, complete samples of the scenes contained in the site, I may be tempted to expand or "upgrade" my membership. As it is, I only want to get away and never look back.
A crappy trial membership like this one gives me the impression that the content really is not that good, so they prefer to screw passers-by and get 2$-3$ from them instead of trying to secure long-term memberships from people who could be really interested...
|
07-14-10 09:42am
|
Reply
80
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
That makes sense. I'm guessing the content is exactly the same but only difference is where the models are from? Cool stuff. Thanks for the quick response and answer. Appreciated :)
|
07-11-10 10:39pm
|
Reply
81
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Capn:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Cheers for that!
Lokks very promising! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-29-10 02:31pm
|
Reply
82
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for the info.
It is on the probable list for me then ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-29-10 02:28pm
|
Reply
83
|
Lezboland
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Sevrin:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Right you are. I never actually subbed, just put it on my list.
I apologize.
|
06-28-10 07:53pm
|
Reply
84
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I wouldn't normally think of them as deliberately screwing us over except for the fact that their latest updates to Zoliboy are so far removed from the spirit of this formerly very original and kinky group that I consider a vanilla update that offers nothing but the run of the mill porn you see in all their other sites cheating (sleazy). But to quote you, I could be wrong. But their reluctance to offer their new sites to long term subscribers is very thoughtless and cheap of them. Which is sort of sleazy in my eyes.
|
06-27-10 04:17pm
|
Reply
85
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
I didn't compare the two sites .. just the absolute dislike both of us feel towards the respective sites. I've never been a member of Brazzers so there would be no way for me to compare anything. Hope this clears it up.
|
06-27-10 02:05pm
|
Reply
86
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
AND the site is inaccessible again! Not surprising and it's why I react as I do - because when a site gives no access after I first join, and there is no quick C/S response, I've learned to recognize it as a warning sign that the site has MAJOR problems - as this one clearly does.
Now you may want to appoint yourself as the PU Defender of web-masters - that's fine. Me, I want to warn other PU's of sites that are poorly, incompetently run and are un-stable and are likely to not deliver much of value.
How much entertainment do I get from a site to which I have no access - none! How much entertainment do I expect other PU's to get from a site to which I would expect them to get no access - none!
|
06-19-10 10:58am
|
Reply
87
|
Idols 69
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
They can charge somebody else money to read their error messages. I have no interest in paying for a few days of nothing.
|
06-17-10 10:04pm
|
Reply
88
|
Seventeen Video
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Comment
from RonnyO:
Agreed, it's much improved from before. It looks like even the older videos have be upgraded to the new quality level, although I think there are fewer of the "classic" videos than before.
No screenshots and really slow downloads and flash previews are still a problem for me. But generally a big upgrade, imo.
|
06-13-10 12:15pm
|
Reply
89
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from PinkPanther:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
100% perfection as in occasional slow downloads? No problem. If your idea of a slight imperfection is "No pics shows at all on any of the sites in the network", then we'll just have to disagree, because I don't find that tolerable at all.
|
06-12-10 09:56am
|
Reply
90
|
Desk Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from GCode:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Ah man I had no idea it was basically implemented in to the same virtua girl software. Thanks for this info, I think this will help anyone who is interested in the new cards this 'site' has to offer. I think they are doing the right thing by implementing this as a basic addition to the already virtua girl software present. I appreciate the prompt response and detailed info, this helps me understand what is going on with desk babes and their content. I think I may actually check out these cards :)
|
05-24-10 10:01pm
|
Reply
91
|
Desk Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from GCode:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Ah no shit? Is it like the virtua girl scenes with two or more girls but with more explicit stuff? Did you buy scenes or did you do the monthly subscription with a scene a day? I really like the virtua girl strip scenes because I can add music to them and it seems they are constantly improving the program with new additions. A question as well, since u said it's not only girl/girl stuff, with the solo stuff do you still get the strip dancing as well or is it just straight in to the kissing, fingering, and toying stuff? Thanks for the response and info, I appreciate it.
|
05-24-10 08:57pm
|
Reply
92
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for the info. I'll have to think about this network. I'm tempted but I think I'll wait a little longer.
|
05-21-10 03:40pm
|
Reply
93
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
My problem is that it means that I have to do a lot of research on their content and since they have such a large library then I'll waste a lot of time trying to figure new from re-edited older content. I think that's one of the reasons why I'm staying away from this network. I'd prefer if they simply identified their updates with new content and re-edited material.
|
05-20-10 02:35pm
|
Reply
94
|
Give Me Pink
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from exotics4me:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
That may have been the deal you received, but back when I did it, it allowed me to switch the remainder of the membership to one of their other sites without paying. Of note, the month I did it, was the very last month they updated Give Me Pink with the Eva Smile set so I don't know if they changed it now as that was over a year ago, but it was a direct shift of remaining membership to another site at that time.
|
05-18-10 08:21pm
|
Reply
95
|
Ass Traffic
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
You are correct. That is exactly what happened. I believe he's directing for Evil Angel. The money must have been too good to pass up.
|
05-17-10 06:44pm
|
Reply
96
|
Glamour.cz
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
justme, I think it's a nice feature when a site gives an extensive preview of its contents, so a person can get a clear idea of what he would get if he paid to join the site. Many sites provide sample photos and nice-sized thumbnails of their models, and possibly some short video clips. The more information the better, I think. The preview section is part of the advertising for a site.
That's my opinion. But if people want to join a site based on a very limited preview of the site, that's their decision. I certainly don't control what other PU members do or join.
I don't understand what you mean when you say that my comments are what we are all able to easily view for no cost.
If you mean that my comment here, and my other comments, have no value, OK, that's your opinion.
If you mean that I am not charging you to read my comments... PU is a free site that you can join or lurk at, without paying any membership fees, and the member reviews and comments and posts are free for all to read.
|
05-16-10 05:11pm
|
Reply
97
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jerzam2010:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
thanx justme
i didn't know you could get a full access trial for $2.95, through the highly reputable ccbill billing processor.
i think thats where i'll start.
cheers
|
05-07-10 11:22pm
|
Reply
98
|
Hawt TV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from yadayada321:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
When I click on Complete Transaction it says "Invalid username/password." :-). Site might be dead then?
|
04-30-10 04:45pm
|
Reply
99
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from bootsulike:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks!
I'm probably due a revisit to Twistys. Either that or Digital Desire.
|
04-29-10 12:52pm
|
Reply
100
|
Sweet And Nude
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Capn:
(anyonebutme's Reply)
Thanks for the additional info ;0)
Cap'n :0)
|
04-20-10 03:02pm
|
