| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
from Amanda:
Very thorough review, jook! Awesome job!
|
05-05-17 06:58am
|
Reply
52
|
Ersties
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review from jook:
Commentary continued
Streaming includes 2 options, high and low definition. I find that having a low definition choice is a great option since I generally stream just to get a preview. It’s less time consuming then loading the stream in HD.
To give you an idea of the playfulness of the site, the first set centers around a parody of the TV show, “Blind Date,” or more specifically, “Blind Date Goes Ersties Porn Version.” Included in the set, in addition to a parody of the game, is an interview conducted by head honcho Paulita Pappel with one of the models centering on the blind date theme. Strangely, this video is in English with German subtitles. (Some of the videos are in German with no subtitiles.) Also in the set is a video of a parody of the game show. Lastly, there’s another video of the chosen couple having sex.
Solo scenes don’t necessarily include masturbation – one called “Lap dance” simply shows a nude model breathing heavily and moaning while sort of dancing. The audio is stated to be binaural, a special audio technique like 3D. I did not test this with ear plugs and had no desire to do so. Others may find that the audio makes a big difference.
I found many of the interviews tedious and boring. On the plus side, they’re realistic, candid, cover a range of topics and sometimes funny. One model is asked the very original question about her favorite position. The response was hilarious: “Just lying down.” But really, I don’t need an exhaustive biographical interview for each model. I guess that’s why the fast forward button was created.
The site is a refreshing change from the usual in most every respect. Hopefully, San Fernando and other sites will take a cue from Ersties. Despite some flaws, I highly recommend the site for those that like this niche, more like a cross between softcore and hardcore with models (not actors!) and a crew who seem to be enjoying themselves. I am generally not such an abundance of solos and lesbians as well as softer hardcore, but I enjoyed Ersties very much. The site deserves to be praised for their innovation.
Membership options (no PU discount offered):
$29.95 monthly, recurring at $35.00
$35.00 1-month membership non-recurring
$45.00 3-month membership [best deal]
$84.00 6-month membership
$132.00 12-month membership
|
05-04-17 09:13am
|
Reply
53
|
Ersties
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Amanda:
(jook's Reply)
Duly noted, jook! ;)
|
05-02-17 06:06am
|
Reply
54
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Khan:
(jook's Reply)
Your opinion is noted.
|
09-03-14 08:00am
|
Reply
55
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
from RagingBuddhist:
Jook - This is what's known as "taking one for the team". I think everybody's joined a clunker at least once and that's where PU comes into play. You've already commented on your experience, now it might be good to actually review it to help warn other "victims" about what they might expect.
|
09-02-14 07:38pm
|
Reply
56
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
from Khan:
As Pat mentions, we continue to list the site because it is still active (accepting members) and still provides content ... albeit, quite old. Some users don't mind an "archive" site.
In future, I would encourage you to look at the TBP listing page along with the PU listing. The TBP listing for this site clearly states that the last update was in June of 2011. While it's been a while since it was checked, it seems that's still totally accurate info.
I am sorry you joined a site that you didn't like. We do appreciate that you took the time to give fellow users here a heads up that they're still not updating.
|
09-02-14 06:59pm
|
Reply
57
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from pat362:
(jook's Reply)
I can't be certain but my guess is that they still list it because it is still active and they offer a significant discount to TBP/PU members so although you did not like the site. Someone else might be satisfied with content that is 3 years and older. Especially if they aren't too picky about screen resolution which appear to be only 640x480 for the videos.
I highly recommend you take a look at many other sites listed on TBP/PU and you will notice that quite a few of them haven't updated in many years. Just look at my back and forth with the webmaster for busty buffy and you will see that their sites have old content and aren't updating anymore.
I joined the Claudia Marie site because of the TBP discount and do you know what my 10$ got me. Videos that can only be downloaded in 428x240. You can stream them in HD but I don't join a pay site that allows downloads to stream in HD but download in crappy resolution.
|
09-02-14 06:34pm
|
Reply
58
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
from pat362:
I'm sorry you got fooled and maybe there should be more warnings but I think you are partially to blame here. I think you did what most of us have done at least once in our life and went with your heart rather than your brain. You clearly noticed that the TBP review was three years old which should have been your first clue that something might be wrong but your second clue and in my opinion the more obvious one is that the site facts have not been updated in 2 years which means that the review is for all intense and purposes null and void as the site could be completely different. The third clue and you can be forgiven for not looking at it is that if you look at The bottom of the TBP page for this site. You will notice that Rabbit did a review this year and the site got a 58%. I rarely look at other review sites but this is a case where I would only because I prefer to have the most up to date info.
|
09-02-14 06:01pm
|
Reply
59
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from ghosty:
(jook's Reply)
Because I have not been charged yet. My membership is set to rebill on the 15th of this month. I was hoping that we would be able to find an amicable solution if I contacted their support, especially since I bought memberships to three of their sites last month. I don't see that happening, though. It's not even about the money, it's about being deceived and treated like an idiot afterwards. No matter how this ends, they have definitly lost a customer.
|
06-04-14 03:57am
|
Reply
60
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(jook's Reply)
"They need time to sharpen their pencils to write the cancellation order ;)."
Excellent joke.
I've never used jet.com.
I'm a loyal Amazon Prime member.
They give great service. Good prices.
So it's worth the membership fee. (Currently, around $100/year, I think.)
Also get a lot of free movies and TV shows for Amazon Prime members.
I'm surprised about the double authorization. You would think the credit card/bank would charge extra for that.
|
02-09-17 07:19am
|
Reply
61
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(jook's Reply)
I used a PC so it was clearly not the computer but HM. At least they recognized that there was a problem and fixed it because at the time it was so bad that I stopped using Hot Movie.
|
11-23-16 03:30pm
|
Reply
62
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(jook's Reply)
I also have some minutes with the AEBN and I will be doing a review of that site later on this week. For a long time I preferred AEBN because their video player was more reliable. There was a time when the streaming player for HM was less than impressive. It had the bad habit of stopping mid play and you couldn't actually restart the video from where it stopped but had to go further back and try to remember your previous location.
Luckily they fixed that problem which to me is a blessing because HM is far superior to AEBN in the amount of content and the incredible variety. I really like that they have so many clips4sale content from some of my favorite stores. It's nice to download and own but frankly the prices on clips4sale are so high at times that I can't justify paying their price.
|
11-22-16 03:29pm
|
Reply
63
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
from hardog:
Regarding Mac and WMV format...
"VLC" does for WMV as Quicktime does for .mov ...
Use VLC
_______
VLC media player is a free and open source media player, encoder, and streamer made by the volunteers of the VideoLAN community.
VLC uses its internal codecs, works on essentially every popular platform, and can read almost all files, CDs, DVDs, network streams, capture cards and other media formats!
|
12-27-13 08:42am
|
Reply
64
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
from Belthazar:
Competitively priced ?? - The best joke of a year :)
I like Hotmovies, because there is a lot of interesting and hard to find content, but the pricing is ridiculous. The option to buy a favourite scene is really good, but the problem is that many scenes are undownloadable.
|
12-26-13 03:19am
|
Reply
65
|
Hussie Auditions
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
from Amanda:
Hi jook! Thanks for the comments. I will reach out to the site to get confirmation on their trial (limited or full) and we'll make any necessary changes to our review. Thanks again! :)
|
03-22-18 05:44am
|
Reply
66
|
Hussie Auditions
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I didn't use the trial and didn't encounter any download limits. I downloaded a lot in one day so if it was there I would have likely found it.
|
03-21-18 04:44pm
|
Reply
67
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I'm glad to see that this is likely resolved. I wish more webmasters were as customer-oriented as this person is.
|
03-25-17 06:06pm
|
Reply
68
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from AV Revenue:
(jook's Reply)
Dear Jook,
Please send your username to support@membership-help.com , we will take care to refund the $4.95
Regards,
|
03-25-17 12:43pm
|
Reply
69
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
from AV Revenue:
Dear Jook,
Thanks for your comment and feedback about our sites.
We suggest to contact directly our support: http://www.membership-help.com that handle all relationship with billers. It may help to resolve your issue.
To avoid this kind of disappointment with billing system, we are adding an email contact directly into the welcome email for a direct support.
Regards,
|
03-25-17 04:15am
|
Reply
70
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
from lk2fireone:
I'VE ALWAYS HAD GOOD LUCK WITH CCBILL AND EPOCH.
EASY TO DEAL WITH. NO OVER-BILLING, EASY TO CANCEL.
THAT'S JUST MY EXPERIENCE. I CAN'T REALLY SPEAK FOR EVERYONE'S DEALING WITH THEM.
BUT I TRUST CCBILL AND EPOCH, BASED ON MY TRANSACTIONS. WHICH HAS BEEN QUITE A BIT, OVER TIME.
|
03-23-17 12:57pm
|
Reply
71
|
La Sublime XXX
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(jook's Reply)
I'll give it a try lol.
It's like you're watching porn that's not being filmed or planned. There's scenes where the actors/actresses dictate what they want next. It's like there's a strange honesty in it. One model, despite saying the male was very good, said she rarely orgasms and didn't, but she starts masturbating after the sex and has an orgasm. The feeling around the scenes are more genuine. They come off as people getting paid to perform, but also who love sex. It's refreshing to me since I already had been experiencing boredom with most hardcore sites unless there was a distracting story. I also wonder how much of the Italian market they have. The scenes are very professionally-shot, high quality, nice settings, in a way it reminds me of Sex Art except without the heartcore content. I found the tips and hints scenes to be some of the best I've seen on any site just because of the way the models interacted. That could be it too. You know how you watch a mainstream movie with a bunch of amateur actors and then watch one with top-tier mainstream actors and actresses? That difference is what these scenes bring. I'll end by saying don't let that take away from the site it's not "professional" in the American professional porn way of glamour and glitz, it's just like you're watching professional women who are professionals at sex. The men, by my guess, are not professionals, but I could be wrong.
|
10-27-17 09:07pm
|
Reply
72
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(jook's Reply)
JOOK, THERE ARE PROBABLY SMALL SOFTWARE PROGRAMS THAT WILL CONVERT MY REVIEWS AND REPLIES IN UPPERCASE TO LOWERCASE.
IF THAT'S WHAT YOU PREFER.
ESPECIALLY SINCE I WRITE IN TXT FORMAT.
HOPE THAT HELPS.
(SMILE).
BUT I AGREE 100% THAT REVIEW SCORES SHOULD BE TAKEN WITH A GRAIN OF SALT.
THAT'S ONE REASON WHY I DON'T STRUGGLE AS MUCH, WHEN I GIVE A SCORE.
MAKES SCORING A SITE (OR NETWORK) MUCH EASIER FOR ME.
|
09-23-17 05:26pm
|
Reply
73
|
Love Wetting
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from WDGirls:
(jook's Reply)
jook, it is perfectly OK to join the site for just one month and it's in fact very understandable. I myself would do it in the same way. But that doesn't mean that the site owners can't thank to those who decide to support the site every month. We even have customers who have been with us for years or even since the very beginning.
We're basically saying "sure, join us for one month and download all our 700 videos but then I'm afraid we can't give you the 10 extra videos". That's all. No big deal I think. Every customer knows exactly what he's gonna get (hence the preview section) - and he will get it as promised. The rules of getting access to the bonus videos may not be logical but that's our decision and our problem.
Btw. we have ~24 videos every month. 6 videos per week, on Sunday we take a day off to recover (not everybody - I'm doing customer support and I have to be online every single day incl. Christmas...).
|
12-21-16 12:03pm
|
Reply
74
|
Manila Exposed
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Comment
from Khan:
It appears that they've dropped the 29.95 option. I've had our editors adjust the listing accordingly.
Thx for the heads up.
|
01-12-14 07:44am
|
Reply
75
|
Mike in Brazil
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
from Kody:
I felt like the quality of the girls was a lot higher than I expected from your review, which was a nice surprise. The front page does look like my thing.
The daily download limit really seems to be a bummer though. Haven't seen it anywhere before, and I can't imagine why you would impose that on paid members.
|
03-08-18 03:19am
|
