| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Playboy.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from rearadmiral:
Too little, too late really seems to sum it up. Playboy is a brand with a lot of recognition and like so many older studios and brands (I'm looking at you, Hustler) they seemed to miss the boat with the internet. I haven't looked at the Playboy site in a while, but the last time I did look I wasn't compelled to join. If Playboy wanted to do it right they could have a huge success on the internet.
It speaks volumes that most of the active PU members are of an age where Playboy means something and no one has posted a review.
I suspect I'll stop in and check out their tour pages.
|
11-05-11 09:00am
|
Reply
102
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from anyonebutme:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yes, you're right, used to be more exclusive in the past, not quite as exclusive anymore.
|
10-13-11 09:53pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Capn:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Nice trollish try, WG, but I ain' biting!
DOH!!!!!! :0D
Cap'n. :0)
|
10-12-11 04:20pm
|
Reply
104
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Khan:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
No, that ok. If you missed it then someone else might too. Perhaps your remark will draw more attention to the fact that the trial is limited.
|
10-04-11 12:45pm
|
Reply
105
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from Khan:
Did you forget to check the TBP listing page?
https://www.thebestporn.com/review/teenpinkvideos/
I ask because we have it marked as a limited trial.
|
10-04-11 12:18pm
|
Reply
106
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from jberryl69:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Yeah!!!! Lint Balls.
|
10-03-11 03:07pm
|
Reply
107
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
You are right, Wittyguy. I would never subscribe to a site like this one anyway. Just making a general statement on "streaming only" and how much I dislike it. No harm in advertising that dislike a bit! :-)
|
10-03-11 09:55am
|
Reply
108
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from gaypornolover:
I HATE that, thanks for warning everyone. We've got to stop using sites that treat their customers so badly so we can raise standards across the industry. Porn consumers are like any other comsumer, we are paying customers and entitled to great service and respect, not to be ripped off!
Who handles their billing? I'd complain to them and demand a full refund on the basis you were misled. If enough people do that it might have an effect, as well as warnings like yours on sites like this!
|
09-19-11 04:43pm
|
Reply
109
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from elephant:
Thanks for the heads up on this one, yeah not a fan of sites that don't say clearly this isn't a full trial you can and only sampled content. If you piss people off they tend to not go back.
|
09-19-11 03:14pm
|
Reply
110
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from slutty:
nice review wittyguy, this is one of those sites I keep thinking I should try sometime, but just never get around to it. Probably scared off by their homepage that tends to highlight the altered ladies.
|
07-11-11 08:40pm
|
Reply
111
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from mr jam:
Some good advice by lk2fireone to sign up via teen mega world for $19.95. However like you Wittguy i signed up for the $1.00 trial on lolly hardcore because it said full trial on pornusers. Couldn't get any access to the videos whatsoever. Just had links to upgrade to full price for lolly hardcore (which was $29.95, $10 more than teen mega world and the same group of sites). It was only $1.00 and is obviously an admin error (be it PU or the company who owns the web site) but that small error just put me off continuing my membership. shame.
|
04-25-11 08:17am
|
Reply
112
|
Gaping Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from lk2fireone:
Fine review, as usual. Lots of nice details and overall summary. Impressive.
|
04-14-11 11:35am
|
Reply
113
|
Lolly Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
from lk2fireone:
Lolly is a cute girl.
But last update to the site was apparently 2010-08-20.
And like you wrote, it's cheaper to get this site by joining one of the other network sites. I'm a member of Teen Mega World for $19.95/month, which includes full access to the Lolly site and over 20 other sites (with the PU discount).
Joining through Lolly Hardcore directly costs $29.95.
|
04-04-11 03:11pm
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from slategrey:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
lol "winning?"
When have following what charlie sheen do ever been a good idea? Porn takes negative hit :(
|
03-15-11 01:11am
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from turboshaft:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
To be fair, he is "winning" because he has the porn come directly into his home--one of his, uh, girlfriends is a porn star.
Though he probably still has a healthy porn habit too.
|
03-14-11 12:56pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from RustyJ:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
But there's a difference. I'm a hoarder, not a collector. I think collecting is a more refined thing. One where you have maybe a theme and select what you get and keep while I just download it all and often never view again ;)
|
03-09-11 12:39pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from lk2fireone:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Is the fluffer supposed to be male or female, or does it even make a difference?
I never realized a porno flick required so many different talents. Lol.
|
02-11-11 06:57pm
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from turboshaft:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
Some of us are have more than enough to do just trying to keep ourselves aroused!
: - (
|
02-11-11 02:14pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Capn:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I don't think I can do that from here.
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-11-11 02:06pm
|
Reply
120
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from otoh:
Good review, thanks - I'd been thinking of this site, but am more into lingerie/nylons/legs rather than specifically feet - so seeing it go in this direction lets me defer it for now until I've tried some others.
|
01-26-11 11:29pm
|
Reply
121
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from PinkPanther:
Yeah, Babelicious was exciting when it first started - stale as 2-week-old bagels now - and the unique character of Babes.tv - lusciously glam and sleazy at the same time - gone, gone, gone.
There's just no distinguishing personality to this site whatsoever anymore - so what's the point?
|
12-28-10 07:01pm
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from slutty:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
I once saw a guy on a plane reading a Hustler, and he wasn't trying to hide it. I can sort of understand Playboy, as it actually used to be funny sometimes, but Hustler in an aisle seat? I'm sure if you looked carefully you could catch someone looking at porn on their iPad or something.
|
11-23-10 02:10pm
|
Reply
123
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from hardog:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-2979331.php
http://www.sophos.com/security/threat-sp...otlight.html#threat2
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Se...eBinder.shtmlhttp://
Karups first reply was "just had a couple guys in the office scan using malwarebytes and Avira Anti virus and we got nothing found in those 3 images."
Second reply was, "We absolutely do not put keylogger programs into your images or zips. That said I am sending your finds onto our tech department to make sure that nothing has been compromised on our side. I just loaded up those images you mentioned, as well as the zip file for them and my scanner did not report anything back.
I will let you know when I hear back."
_______
Apparently the technology to embed malware in zip files, jpgs, pdf, xls, etc has been available for some time now...
:(
|
11-08-10 06:19pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(Wittyguy's Reply)
That one's gonna have to be put into this year's PU Awards for sure!
|
11-03-10 04:08pm
|
Reply
125
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
from alexmedia:
Thank you for review.
The site looks quite good.
|
09-21-10 09:41am
|
