| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Jay G:
(Monahan's Reply)
3-D smell-o-vision....that sounds heavenly!
|
05-25-09 12:01am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from turboshaft:
(Monahan's Reply)
Smell-o-vision or 3-D sound cool, but if you think about how they would apply to a lot of porn you might wish otherwise. There have been quite a few videos where I thought "it's probably good I can't smell the action, only see and hear it."
3D is making its way into some big Hollywood blockbusters but it is still a gimmick designed to generate a bigger profit with every ticket sold, not a genuine attempt to increase quality.
It would be nice if they tried to eventually increase quality beyond HD (higher definition? super high definition?) but people would probably have to own bigger displays and possess strong vision in order to even tell the difference.
|
05-24-09 11:48am
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from asmith12:
(Monahan's Reply)
> NTSF was the only formatting a PC user should ever use.
Ahem. I don't want to start a flame on this topic (there are lots of other much interesting topics to flame on :-) ), but NTFS has two big disadvantages:
1. while it is indeed more difficult to crash it, it is also much more difficult to retrieve something from it if it crashes.
2. NTFS slows to a crawl (IMHO much worse) on reaching magic number of "90% used" (and speed doesn't necessarily comes back when you're back to below-90%). I even think I know why, but this is beyond the scope of this poll :-).
|
04-17-09 06:37am
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from monty2222:
(Monahan's Reply)
"So I need another option, "the cum shot is not self induced by the male."
I agree with that completely. It's especially annoying when there's whole minutes of the guy jerking off, with the girl just waiting on her knees with her hands in her lap...
|
04-10-09 06:41am
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from Tree Rodent:
(Monahan's Reply)
This is true to a certain extent, but I have to say I don't even trust CCBill or Epoch that much either. There is too much that is underhand and has the appearance of being underhand and dishonest, in the internet porn industry. Having said that, I get the impression that CCBill and Epoch seem to be more trusted by members here than most. But if sites do all of those things I mentioned and more, and CCBill and Epoch are their billing agents, what does that say about CCBill or Epoch, and how trustworthy they are? I do agree to a certain extent though.
|
03-28-09 07:18pm
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Drooler:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan said: "I suggested this poll because I was curious how others felt about this. If a search function is rated lousy in a review I usually move on without signing up, but if a good search function is operating on the preview site that I like and that has a good review, I'm likely to sign up."
That's a good point about the preview having the search function. It's a plus because it shows that the site is serious enough to allow visitors to examine the content and the quality of the engine -- UNLESS of course the engine turns out to be a clunker.
But it's a hellava big step in the right direction in either case compared to those sites that don't show visitors much at all and have this blinking-ass "Join Now!" thing going with all clicks linked directly to the signup page.
But I answered "for large sites" or whatever it was (not showing on this reply page). I'm with Wittyguy that smaller sites or ones that have good organization of content and show their updates in order with dates to the visitor don't really need to have a search engine.
BTW, I also think that EuropeanGlamourGirls has a nice enough search engine for its size, though the content is too often dull and repetitive.
BTW #2: What you said about accuracy is of course important! When they mispell names, etc., it's the old computer term GIGO -- garbage in, garbage out. Yeah, that just sucks.
|
03-21-09 04:37pm
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from TrashMan:
(Monahan's Reply)
Hey, thats what happens when you review sites like ClubRedlight and Sinnistar, both of which continue to use DRM. lol.
|
03-15-09 09:44pm
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
I also enjoy creampies because at least it makes sense from a sex point of view. I have no problem with a blow job that results in ejacalation, but it must remain in the mouth. She doesn't have to swallow, but there can't be any pulling out and the guy shooting all over the place. That is one of the reasons why I much prefer older movies to most of todays stuff.
|
02-14-09 05:09pm
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from badandy400:
(Monahan's Reply)
....just a bit of porn!?!?!?! I have enough porn here to impeach the entire senate! :)
|
01-23-09 07:05pm
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from mbaya:
(Monahan's Reply)
Nero, the programming for DVD burning, also allows the ability to edit out parts of videos, as well as convert them to MP4.
|
01-15-09 11:49am
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
Maybe a lawyer should answer this topic, but I would guess that you could be cited for reading a porn magazine in a bar. In some areas you could be cited for smoking in a bar. You do drugs in a bar, you could be cited.
I don't think you could be cited for driving a SUV to a bar, unless you broke some law while driving.
I also don't think you could be cited for wearing a "Jesus Saves" jacket in a bar.
Those are my opinions, but I am not a lawyer.
So when you say that porn is socially tolerated, you are speaking very broadly. Porn is not socially or legally tolerated in many public areas.
|
01-12-09 05:05pm
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yep, those are always the questions that follow, except for your follow-up ones! British videos sometimes have flashes of humor in them and they are much more casual and imaginative in their approach, Japanese videos show some variation from one to the other .. but the American produced ones .. arghh! Every category follows the same basic formula, only the models change. The Porn industry is in the hands of a bunch of immature, uncouth, loudmouthed wannabes.
|
12-16-08 06:12pm
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
I think two minutes is plenty when it comes to everything they do. That's my constant beef .. it's all too dragged out and after a while you start fast forwarding to get to the next act because whatever they happen to be doing has become boring. I've been blaming my age but maybe those sex marathons are boring to the young as well.
|
12-15-08 10:19am
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from apoctom:
(Monahan's Reply)
Alright, so that VHS example was pretty hot. There is similar stuff on FTV Girls, especially the older, "more extreme" girls. The ones I remember off-hand include bocce balls, and the shifter on a Ford Mustang (she squatted over the center console). That girl was crazy, but since she seemed to be really enjoying it, it was quite a turn-on.
|
12-10-08 11:21pm
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#59
from Pinche Kankun:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan, you have been a cool buddy for a long time with me on this site!! You definitely need to be showed by me that I am not a liar!! See please view my information:
Homemade Uncensored - Subscription ID # 208342701000000889 Signup Date: 12/07/08 CCBILL ICQ MAIL
Little Liana - Subscription ID # 208305501000009792 Signup Date: 10/31/08 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Little Lupe - Subscription ID # 107265601000014297 Signup Date: 09/22/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Raven Riley - Subscription ID # 107241301000002418 Signup Date: 08/29/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Pacino's Adventures - Subscription ID # 108271601000039085 Signup Date: 09/27/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Nubiles - Subscription ID # 108202701000003673 Signup Date: 07/20/2008 CCBILL AOL MAIL
Best Teens.com - Subscription ID # 107147701000005429 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
8th Street Latinas - Subscription ID # 107147701000002410 Signup Date: 05/27/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Exploited College Girls - Subscription ID # 107131501000001937 Signup Date: 05/11/2007 CCBILL YAHOO MAIL
Night Invasion - Member ID # 1267666873 Order Date: 11/22/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Manila Amateurs - Member ID # 1270044479 Order Date: 12/05/2008 EPOCH BILLING
Real Ex Girlfriends, Nasty Angels and Karup's Hometown Amateurs might have changed their billing provider, HOWEVER WILL FIND OUT MY INFORMATION AND YOU WILL SEE!!
(KHAN, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE THIS INFORMATION!! I MUST DO THIS!! THIS IS IMPORTANT!!) >:D
|
12-10-08 12:30pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#47
from Tree Rodent:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yeah I agree with you 100 per cent.
|
12-09-08 11:58am
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#32
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
Sort of depressing, to think that we have "rogue members." A review means a lot of thought for me, while it's fun at the same time. I still don't see the reasoning behind cheating!!??
|
12-08-08 07:53pm
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Drooler:
(Monahan's Reply)
I'd put Faye Reagan in as a candidate for big nipples. They look delicious.
For ass, Nikky Case somehow immediately comes to mind.
|
12-02-08 10:15pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#20
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan, we've had a lot more years of Republican presidents than Democratic presidents since Lyndon Johnson.
Lyndon B. Johnson (Democrat),Richard Nixon(Republican),Gerald Ford(Republican),Jimmy Carter(Democrat),Ronald Reagan(Republican), George H. W. Bush(Republican),Bill Clinton(Democrat),George W. Bush(Republican)
I think it was more the changes in the country as a whole and the development of internet that led to the changes of:
1- full frontal nudity in Playboy and the emergence of the Hustler style magazines during Nixon,
2- full insertions displayed in men's magazines during Bush 2.
Nixon was a Quaker, and I seriously doubt he believed in any rights of porn.
Bush #2 is a Methodist, who said, "I believe that God wants me to be president."
Bush #2 believes in freedom, as a young man he was supposed to be wild, but as president, he is supposed to represent family values (which don't usually include the freedom of porn).
Porn is now a multi-billion dollar industry.
Larry Flynt and Hustler spent many years in the courtroom fighting obscenity charges. At least two cases went all the way to the US Supreme Court.
Hugh Hefner and Playboy also spent years fighting obscenity charges.
Most Democrats and Republicans believe in family values, which does not include the right of porn.
"Laissez faire" free market types do not normally extend that protection to porn. It's true that Democrats are supposed to be more anti-big-business than Republicans But any Democratic or Republican politician who stands up and says the US public has the right to enjoy porn is the exception. It's the US court system that has backed the right to adult entertainment, not the US legislative or executive branches.
|
11-24-08 12:46pm
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Drooler:
(Monahan's Reply)
About what Chuck Schumer said, I've been looking and looking and have only been able to find material in which he uses the idea of pornography to make a point about his advocacy of the so-called "fairness doctrine." He says that we should allow for a fair amount of time on the air for both (again so-called) liberal and conservative talk shows and such.
He compares the conservative opinion to pornography to make his point that both are far more widespread than their opposites are. I am paraphrasing here, as I wouldn't know what the "opposite" of pornography would be. Neutered humans sitting around talking about politics maybe?
Comparing conservative opinion to pornography is, I think, simply Sen. Schumer's way of drawing attention to the issue, which is a real can of worms because we always have to ask where to draw the line and with what. And then there's the First Amendment, of course.
Hopefully, this is just a tempest in a teapot. There are far more important things for the government to be concerned about now, and well into the future, than this.
|
11-09-08 04:33pm
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Khan:
(Monahan's Reply)
Ahhh ... got it.
Well, so far just elonlybuster (in reply #3) has given his reasoning.
|
11-08-08 09:38am
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Khan:
(Monahan's Reply)
errr ... in the forum thread "Where are all the trust votes gone?" it was explained to you why we allow (and will continue to allow) anonymous Trust Ratings. Just because you do not happen to agree with the reasoning doesn't mean it hasn't been explained.
And while I'm posting ...
Those that voted "No, Never" should problably do a review of all the Trust Ratings they've given because I know for a fact some of you have given anonymous ratings. Haha ... before you get all rhiled, remember many or the early Trust Ratings were made anonymously.
And to answer the person who selected "Is there a way I can check?"
If you're unsure of who you've given ratings too, check out post number 7 and 10 in the thread, "Where are the trust-rating?" for two different ways to check.
|
11-08-08 05:16am
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from Pinche Kankun:
(Monahan's Reply)
AND I GOT DISREGARDED FOR MENTIONING SIMILAR IDEAS PORN KEEPS COMING UP WITH... HA HA HA :D !!! Monahan, bro, U said a mouthful! HA HA HA HA :D
I cannot wait 2 find the prick who thinks I wanna focus on any man's muthaphuckin' scrotum and no part of the female anatomy!!! >:O
|
11-08-08 02:14am
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from elonlybuster:
(Monahan's Reply)
I've gotta say I completely agree with the last part. I can't count the number of times I find a gorgeous looking girl only to find out that half the video is focused on the guy's balls and dick than the actual girl.
|
11-06-08 05:00am
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#7
from Cybertoad:
(Monahan's Reply)
Nicely Said , Monohan .
|
11-05-08 11:57am
|
