| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from Monahan:
In compar5ison to most other sites I find DDF Prod to be superior in many (most?) respects, such as video quality, variety (DDF has several specialty genres like Hands on Hardcore, House of Taboo, etc.) and the mainstream 1 by Day, all of which have extremely well produced exclusive content.
Yes, a few of the older material remains in multiple segments but the vast majority is done in one complete video.
The only issue of significance that I have is that some current updates are not available in WMV format and can only be downloaded in MOV (Apple)format.
The scoring is always a subjective matter but, having been a member of well over 30 sites over the last 6 or 7 years, this site (network) remains a leader in my opinion.
|
01-18-11 11:36pm
|
Reply
27
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Ace DDF:
(careylowell's Reply)
Hi,
The links you have pasted are from the free section, not the members' area. All three of those sets have downloadable videos in the members' area, I took screenshots as well:
http://ddfcash.com/temp/svc-karma.jpg
http://ddfcash.com/temp/svc-katy-caro.jpg
http://ddfcash.com/temp/svc-margareth.jpg
I have also went through a few categories in the members area, that you just referred to.
43 hardcore updates
65 leg updates
42 blowjob updates
Every single update in these sections has videos.
Of course the rating is absolutely your decision. I just want to make sure that the thread has the correct information.
Best regards,
Endre
DDF Productions
|
01-18-11 04:08am
|
Reply
28
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from nadiencendia:
I would say that this rating is a bit harsh, specially if you keep it at 75, considering the ammount and quality of the content you get. I too don't like the "Sapphic Erotica" bonus sets, and I am glad they are discontinuing them, but even without those, you get a handful of sets every week, with high quality, good- to great-looking models and in different niches (solo, mf, ff, feet...).
DDF has its flaws, as every network or site out there, but it's still up there on top for me. Hotlegsandfeet, in particular, will always have a special place in my heart :)
Anyway, we may agree to disagree...
|
01-18-11 04:07am
|
Reply
29
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Ace DDF:
(careylowell's Reply)
Hi,
Thanks! It very much looks like some false reports on websecurityguard.com. I'm going to contact them to clean it up.
Here's a screenshot of me downloading the latest SexVideoCasting set video, at the top from sexvideocasting.com, at the bottom from ddfprod.com with a network password:
http://ddfcash.com/temp/svc-download.jpg
Best regards,
Endre
|
01-17-11 06:35am
|
Reply
30
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from Ace DDF:
Hi carelowell!
Endre from DDF Prod here. Thanks for the review!
I have installed AVG Internet Security 2011, and checked the HandsOnHardcore pages. It didn't give me any warnings. One of our developers took a quick look, he hasn't found anything out of ordinary either.
Please send me the exact address or page AVG warned you about, and we will look more into it. It might be a false alarm, but such issues are important.
SexVideoCasting - basically all scenes have vids, and about half of them has photos, I think you have missed them somehow. You can browse them on both ddfprod.com and sexvideocasting.com.
EuroGirlsOnGirls. You are right, these were bonus photo sets from Sapphic Erotica, an addition to our normal weekly updates. New Sapphic bonus sets are not added anymore.
Best regards,
Endre
endre@ddfcash.com
|
01-17-11 05:16am
|
Reply
31
|
Doggy Boys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
The site owner had contacted me to tell me he was improving it and asked me to make some changes to my review which I did. I have since rejoined the site and realized most of the changes were cosmetic. I also felt we are reviewers and should not change what we write no matter how critical it is to the site. We can add comments about the changes, but the original review should stay.
It is kind of you to read my reviews as I read others (including for straight sites). I want everyone to know my reviews are for them and if the owners want to use them to improve it is fine with me. But the reviews are for users such as yourself and not the owners.
|
11-29-17 10:40am
|
Reply
32
|
English Lads
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
The thing is they also don't state what the download charges are. I would imagine the Premium videos go for a much higher rate. I welcome any member of this site or the site owners to come here to comment or explain why they do what they do.
|
10-01-19 08:26am
|
Reply
33
|
Enigmatic Boys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
I agree that around 80% are solos. There are some hot duos in the archives, though. I have noticed many Euro sites tend to be mainly solo these days.
You might want to wait until they have a sale on their site in that case. I have seen it go as low as $7 for a few weeks (unlimited downloads).
Still, the models are hot and are gorgeous to look at for me and I like it when they shower.
|
04-02-17 09:52am
|
Reply
34
|
EU Twinks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
Some of the sites show all the other sites included in Gay Hub while others don't. Others show model lists while others take you immediately to the order board. Blake Mason's site will only allow you to join their site even though all their videos are included in Gay Hub.
As I state in my review there is a lot to like and a lot to dislike here. I had to round the rating to an even 75. Not great but not so bad either.
They do have thousands of videos and not all their models are listed when you do join. But the fun is in the searching of sites like these...
|
07-04-18 08:20am
|
Reply
35
|
Fuck Hot Boys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
I joined as I am redoing all of my DVDs and there are some decent twink models. It is worth $10, but not any more to join for a month.
|
04-14-18 07:33am
|
Reply
36
|
Girls Rimming
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(careylowell's Reply)
Thanks for taking the time to comment on my review.
I'm a big fan of girl-on-girl and guy-on-girl rimming too. I like director/performers like Mike Adriano because he does a lot of rimming on the models.
For me the act of a woman rimming a man isn't really about the act itself as much as it's about the seeming submission. I like porn that has a D/s theme and girl-on-guy-rimming, at least in my brain, fits that bill.
|
04-03-17 06:38am
|
Reply
37
|
Helix Studios.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
The sale is over for now. They do have sales in the future so you can join at $15 or so. I have a discounted rate because I joined when I became a member of Helix. (I renew 8teenboy but not Helix as Helix is too expensive for what they offer.)
I also had joined Helix when it was having a special. You might want to rejoin Helix when they have one of their specials as you will be able to join 8teenboy at a discount of $14.95 a month like I did.
|
02-17-18 10:02am
|
Reply
38
|
Helix Studios.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
There is a 40% discount on 8teenboy.com right now for Valentine's Day. Definitely worth it at that price. :)
|
02-12-18 08:56am
|
Reply
39
|
Helix Studios.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
Some of the older videos made by 8teenboy are still available. The new site is really good but it is not listed here yet so I can't review it. Wait for a deal to join as I did.
If you join Helix at a deal, they usually offer membership with 8teenboy with a deal as well. The problem is you pay a $5 preview charge for three days before being able to download anything. My membership to 8teenboy costs only $15 a month.
|
01-02-18 09:37am
|
Reply
40
|
Helix Studios.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
You can get Staxus to download but it's a costly deal for the entire year at $369. Most of us don't have that in our budgets.
|
06-09-16 09:06am
|
Reply
41
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from TrashMan:
I think all the girls answer casting calls in newspapers or sex mags.
It is important to point out that all the girls are English (which you can deduce by their noticeable accent), so I'm going to say that unless you live in England and are familiar with English porn sites, more likely than not you will have never seen the girls the site features.
|
02-17-09 07:17pm
|
Reply
42
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
>Does anyone claim to have seen these gals elsewhere?
It's funny that you mentioned Abby Winters later in your review - If you look close enough, I think you'll find at least one or two girls from Abby's on the site. The ones that spring to mind are Ainslee and Antoinette, but I'm pretty sure if I dug through what I have saved from the site there were more. I Feel Myself, Girls Out West and AbbyWinters are all Australian based, so it wouldn't surprise me if some of the girls are also on GOW.
|
02-17-09 12:04am
|
Reply
43
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from lk2fireone:
Nice solid review with lots of details.
The only thing I question is your opinion that there might be gentlemen on the PU site to read your review. The PU membership tends to lean towards the redneck/caveman/pervert persuasions.
|
02-16-09 05:53pm
|
Reply
44
|
James Deen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from KayTBuffs:
(careylowell's Reply)
I don't think it's a conspiracy. I also don't think it's coincidence that his critical words are only to female members. My previous reply while sarcastic in tone wasn't sarcastic. With him being an older man, I do believe he believes women shouldn't be here reviewing with the men.
|
04-28-20 09:11pm
|
Reply
45
|
James Deen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from KayTBuffs:
(careylowell's Reply)
I replied but received an invalid screen. The site must have timed out.
I didn't say what he said was fake. I am aware of the accusations. The beginning of my review says I read a story about James Deen years ago and how he was the boy next door in porn. The story is still online. James Deen boy next door it's on abcnews.
The problem I have is with him calling me naive. It's not the first time he has said something like this to me. I reviewed a site called Fucking Glasses and gave it a 65. I signed up for a full membership at full price and they only gave me trial access. They didn't respond to my emails. LKLK replied, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them." I could download 2 scenes. The site later apologized and fixed the problem. I raised the score by 20 points.
He had no problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site.
He doesn't tell the other members to overcome their bitterness when they're getting ripped off.
Maybe that's just me being naive? I should stand in the other room while the men talk? Maybe I'll find the word misogynistic in the dictionary while waiting to be allowed to have an opinion.
|
04-27-20 11:20am
|
Reply
46
|
James Deen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from KayTBuffs:
(careylowell's Reply)
There's more to this than whether what he said is fake or not. I rated this site 36th of 42 sites I have reviewed. The ones below it are mostly sites that ripped me off. Yet, he calls me naive. The comment I made about James Deen size was an insult. It's also a reality in the field I work in that some women do lie. If accusations matter that much, maybe a search of the internet for, "Porn producer accused of abusing models" should be done? There are 1.7 million results. There's just a feeling from me that LKLK has a problem with women reviewing.
In a previous review of Fucking Glasses, he called me bitter, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them."
I had scored that site a 65 because I paid full price and they only gave me trial access. It went from being able to download all scenes to only being able to download 2 scenes. The site also wouldn't reply to emails until I posted the review. They then replied to the emails and apologized saying it was a sign-up error. They extended my account for another month and I raised their score to 85.
Here's the question. Why didn't LKLK or his other account have a problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site? Which was posted during the time the accusations were fresh (2 years ago).
Why doesn't he reply to reviews or comments that are getting ripped off and tell them to overcome their bitterness?
If I wasn't so naive, I would say he's a little misogynistic towards women reviewing porn.
|
04-27-20 11:06am
|
Reply
47
|
Jelena Jensen
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from PinkPanther:
Jelena is another of the models doing cam shows at Misha's 1ModelCam Network - pretty regularly doing a show at some point during the week. Her next scheduled cam show is this Thursday at 7 PM Pacific Time. I don't know if her site links to this network - it would be odd if it did not.
|
05-26-08 09:30am
|
Reply
48
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from lk2fireone:
(careylowell's Reply)
I'VE NEVER REALLY THOUGHT ABOUT IT.
I DO KNOW I'VE TRIED READING LARGE-SIZED BOOKS MANY TIMES.
SOME OF THEM WERE COPIES OF BOOKS I HAVE ENJOYED READING IN THE PAST.
BUT FOR SOME REASON, THERE WAS NO PLEASURE IN READING THE LARGE-SIZED BOOK VERSION.
BUT I THINK THE FONT STYLE MIGHT BE WHY I DID NOT ENJOY THE LARGE-PRINT BOOKS.
I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THIS UNTIL YOU POINTED IT OUT.
I MUST BE DUMB, IN A WAY.
BUT I CAN ACCEPT THAT. BECAUSE IT'S THE WAY I AM, AND I CAN'T CHANGE IT.
|
07-04-17 11:34pm
|
Reply
49
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from lk2fireone:
(careylowell's Reply)
THANKS FOR THE KIND RESPONSE.
AT MY AGE, I WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO OUTRUN DOBERMANS.
EVEN WHEN I WAS YOUNGER, THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFICULT.
BE WELL.
PS: (WHAT'S SURPRISING TO ME, IS THAT I DON'T LIKE READING LARGE-PRINT BOOKS. I PREFER THE REGULAR, SMALL-SIZED PRINT. IT MUST BE A PSYCHOLOGY THING, BECAUSE LARGE-PRINT WOULD BE EASIER TO READ.)
|
04-20-17 09:05pm
|
Reply
50
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(careylowell's Reply)
I'M GETTING OLD.
I WRITE IN UPPER CASE BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ, WRITE, EDIT.
NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE.
BUT IT'S EASIER FOR ME, THAN TRYING TO SEE LOWER-CASE LETTERS,
SOMETIMES I PUT THE REASON FOR THE UPPER CASE IN MY REPLIES/COMMENTS/REVIEWS,
SOMETIMES NOT.
|
04-20-17 03:21pm
|
