| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from LPee23:
(careylowell's Reply)
That drive was astoundingly bad. Backblaze published data on those drives in 2015. In their first year in service, 2013, their failure rate was 129%. That failure rate is calculated as a mean value, they did not publish the associated confidence interval, so that is why it is higher than 100%. Basically, in the harsh conditions of frequent I/O and temperature in which Backblaze studied those drives, they were failing more frequently than once per year.
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-driv...reliability-q3-2015/
|
06-12-16 05:37pm
|
Reply
2
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Cybertoad:
(careylowell's Reply)
This is true, and Lincoln
Was the Republicans first elected president.
And the first to strike down the slavery of Democrats.
I stand corrected men can do great things with no experience.
|
04-06-14 06:27am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#11
from Denner:
(careylowell's Reply)
OK!
THAT...I've seen it in some older movies - and it was just, well, what can I say: cute, sweet, innocent ect...............and: those were the days....before the world was a mess and went ugly.
Thanks for this info, careylowell!
|
04-13-11 08:50am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from jberryl69:
(careylowell's Reply)
Another issue that legalizing it would resolve since dosage control could be put into place and what you cut it with won't be crap to kill ya.
|
01-16-11 08:35pm
|
Reply
5
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Drooler:
(careylowell's Reply)
I do understand the predicament. As we say in some parts of the US, "Whattayagonnado?"
|
01-03-10 02:07am
|
Reply
6
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from exotics4me:
(careylowell's Reply)
Man, get over it, it was months ago.
|
07-12-09 08:31pm
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from pat362:
(careylowell's Reply)
That would seem right because IAFD says that Tracy's birthday is May 7 1968. That would mean she was 16 at the time. No matter how we look at it. She was underage. She didn't act or look like a 16yrs old. There have been quite a few rumors over the years that she planned her downfall. The main reason for the rumors is that she created her own production company and filmed the only legal Tracy Lord porn movie: Tracy I love you. She went to the authorites right after it's release. She made a killing with that single movie since she was still a very popular actress and the only movie anyone could own or sell was Tracy I love you. A couple of persons were sent to jail because of this and in their defense. She presented a valid drivers license. I'm glad she was able to find a career out of porn.
|
07-12-09 08:59am
|
Reply
8
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from exotics4me:
(careylowell's Reply)
See Carey, I had a feeling this was going to go this way.
First, you are not required to read my posts if you don't like them or if they are not rhetorical enough or too rhetorical for you and Demosthenes.
Second, you say to keep perspective. You submitted this poll question, and haven't even posted your stance on it. So, for you to say that you were not advocating babies in a furnace, really has no meaning whatsoever, you haven't advocated either side of this very topic! A few of the members even showed some curiosity towards the topic, but you still didn't expand on it, explain it, or give your opinion. The question also does not give your stance away.
Third, you submitted a poll question, meaning you wanted opinions on this topic. I gave my opinion and for whatever reason, you admit in this (#19) reply that you were being a bastard towards me because of my opinion, which must differ from yours, even though I had no clue what your opinion was, see your words, "You're the only one on PU permitted to be a bastard?"
Fourth, of my hundreds of replies, which you are of course free to skip over, I've never been called a bastard or thought I replied in other way except to be helpful or to joke around with the member I replied to.
Of course you aren't going to argue my 2nd post, you would prefer playing flame wars like we were in the 5th grade. If my stance on the point hasn't been clear, it is nothing more than a rule that nearly all businesses have. It asks soldiers to "Not tell your sexual preference and we won't ask". Now, somehow this became about gays, but the rule is saying no one tell, so it isn't just about gays, until the wonderful American media put their typical sensationalistic twist on it and made it into discrimination. Rosa Parks, Dr. King, Jackie Robinson and millions of others roll in their graves about what is considered discrimination these days in America.
|
03-26-09 01:18pm
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from exotics4me:
(careylowell's Reply)
Carey, you dummied down my entire post. The post is about sexuality, not gender and the situation was hypothetically asked, not something that was tried to be seriously passed.
In life, a male or female is based on their reproductive organs at birth. Over time, puberty strikes and sexuality is born.
Somewhere around this point, it is not okay for males and females to take showers together. It really isn't just because one has a dick and one doesn't. It is because of the possible bad situations that could come from it. Most likely, but not completely, based on the males possibly sexually assaulting the females.
Going by that, if a gay man, who is sexually aroused by naked men is allowed to stand in a room full of naked straight men and get his jollies, then it is no different, hypothetically, then a straight man standing in a shower room full of nude women, getting his jollies.
Oh and by pointing out gender, it does go against the very question that was asked since homosexuals blur the line that gender is defined by. A gay man is a man by gender because of his penis, but is attracted to the same things sexually that a female is attracted to.
|
03-25-09 07:44pm
|
Reply
10
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from badandy400:
(careylowell's Reply)
No babe spotting would defeat the purpose for me!
It is a very broad and likely uneducated statement. I never have been to one and never will. I do not see the appeal in hanging around a bunch of naked people with no sexual innuendos at least.
I know for one of two things would happen. One I would have a hard on the whole time, thus embarrassment. Or I would be extremely limp and shriveled, thus embarrassment. I am sure people do not say much about it there, but I would still be very self conscious and not get a lot of enjoyment out of it. Perhaps this is all my ignorance showing through, but I do not intend on finding out personally.
So if you have been to a few and can testify that there are good looking people there than I will stand corrected at your word. I have seen many nudist videos and picture scattered over the internet and extremely rarely is there anyone that i would call attractive. That is the bases for my opinion, however weak of a base it may be. But you wont find me sitting naked by the lake with my buddies!
|
03-06-09 12:29am
|
Reply
11
|
18 Stream
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from lk2fireone:
(careylowell's Reply)
"Can a tripod be an unaffordable luxury?"
I don't know if most guys shooting porn have discovered the tripod yet. But the videos at this site are less herky-jerky than at some sites which can almost give you motion sickness.
I gave you a positive trust rating on 02-19-09 with the following comment: "Good reviews, more recent ones with lots of details."
So I don't think there's anything wrong with your reviews. I think they provide a good flavor of the sites you write about (details and opinions beyond the basic site statistics).
But thanks for the thumbs up on my review.
And I also agree with your idea that most East European models are getting paid peanuts compared to what American models make. That's a good part of the reason why there was such an explosion of porn coming out of East Europe: the cheap production costs.
But what I am really thankful for is the number of physically attractive young models. Some of them are truly lovely. More on the softcore side, but a number in hardcore as well.
|
04-15-11 10:34pm
|
Reply
12
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(careylowell's Reply)
THANKS FOR THE COMPLIMENT.
APPRECIATED.
YOU SOMETIMES WONDER IF ANYONE READS THESE REVIEWS.
YEARS AGO, THERE WERE MORE REPLIES BY THE MEMBERS, SO YOU KNEW, AT LEAST, THAT SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE PU STAFF WERE READING THEM.
LOL.
|
02-27-19 01:20pm
|
Reply
13
|
All Anal
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(careylowell's Reply)
Agreed. I find the close-ups to be a bit annoying too.
|
09-03-19 03:31am
|
Reply
14
|
BangBus
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from badandy400:
Just for clarification it is 5 years I believe, I just read an article bout a child porn case that was resolved the other day. But, we all get your point!
They have Gianna Michaels among others, I am pretty sure she is checked for age and diseases. Besides, they due use condoms.
Basically, there is nearly zero real reality porn out there. The site could not sell it if it was true reality because of the age issues and other legal stuff. It is just a fantasy! Just like sites like Brazzers who have the girls dress up like teachers or nurses, it is not real. It is just to help you imagine doing that yourself.
I can not say my email address was sold by them, but perhaps by some others. I get tons of penis enlargement adds among other things.
But I must ask why you joined the site if did not think you would like it? If you wanted out within minutes because of the content type you should have been able to see that before joining. I can not say this is my favorite site on their network by any means, actually I believe it is the worst. But I believe you are being a bit harsh since this does not seem to be your sort of thing. Be like many of us on here giving a gay site a 50 just because it had no women. I think the idea of the site could not be misunderstood, hell it is even in the name!
|
05-23-08 05:03pm
|
Reply
15
|
Boy Crush
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(careylowell's Reply)
That makes a lot of sense. I've heard of women who do porn to increase their earnings as a stripper. Having porn as a background can probably earn both men and women a lot more money in other parts of the sex industry.
|
08-26-18 04:39am
|
Reply
16
|
Boy Crush
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
As I state in my review, the reason to join is for the many videos from the past. I do agree with you about the quality of models for the most part. They have found some cuties recently who have kept their pubes intact. The problem is they are now run by a Euro Porn type outfit who wants all their models to shave and act the same.
Staxus is a decent site, but it also has many of the same problems as does BC.
As for outdoor scenes, I never liked them as I noticed the flies and bees bothering the poor models. Imagine getting stung on a very sensitive area.
BTW, it also helps to join BC when they have a sale of only $14.95. I don't see paying $25 a month for a site that doesn't update like they used to.
BC is a B grade studio nowadays but it does have enough to merit a rating in the high 70s/low 80s for me. It will need to improve to go back to being a topnotch studio and site to receive a score higher than 90.
|
08-24-18 10:27am
|
Reply
17
|
Boy Crush
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
I have amended the review to show the decline in video quality of late. I don't think the sets are too relevant, but they do make it known the site does pinch pennies.
On the plus side is the many hundreds of videos it has. Most sites seem content with just a few dozen and recycle them.
It is a decent site even though there is room for improvement.
I also have noticed the lack of newer models of late. They seem to be in a bit of a rut.
|
06-13-16 08:54am
|
Reply
18
|
Boys Fuck Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
The site comprises of older videos as the models appear in the Mike 18 sites frequently. They were made when CRT computers ruled the land. The quality of the videos varies as many appear to be taken from old VHS tapes. Mike himself should be in his thirties by now.
|
04-15-18 08:47am
|
Reply
19
|
Boys Fuck Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
That is why I say buyer beware as it is a bit high for a site like this. They might have some decent video files but it is hard to say with no true preview. It is owned by the same owners of Mike 18 and Fuck Hot Boys if that helps.
|
04-14-18 07:35am
|
Reply
20
|
Busty Romina Lopez
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from williamj:
(careylowell's Reply)
I haven't been a member of score land for 5 years. Maybe 8 years might be a bit of an over statement. 5 years I'm sure of . She was doing mag layouts and some solo video. I don't think I recall any lezzie. She had a nice hairy cunt in some of the layouts.
|
09-05-08 12:15pm
|
Reply
21
|
Busty Romina Lopez
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from williamj:
Ms. Lopez has been a model for over 8 years. she was in lots of Scores layouts. I liked her stuff.
|
09-05-08 08:14am
|
Reply
22
|
Busty Romina Lopez
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from badandy400:
Can you tell us how big the site is. I am just looking for an idea. I like to know if there is 10 videos or 500. It makes a big difference on which sites I join and when. Also, video and picture quality information would be nice.
|
09-03-08 04:50pm
|
Reply
23
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from Monahan:
I remain totally pissed at these jokers at the way they defrauded their members with their old DRM waiver scam back in 2005 and 2006.
But when they offered a discounted membership to PornUser members, I thought I'd give it a go to see whether the site now offered the old content without DRM.
So I went in to sign up to find out that the discount was not really available after all, and no response from their customer support people. (After notifying Khan, the discount offer was pulled down from the PU listing.)
The technical flaws mentioned in this review were common when I was a member and apparently still are. These flaws are very rare in other sites but the folks at Danni.com don't seem to give a shit and let them continue rather than correct them.
So the bottom line is that this site continues to screw its members with false promises and a terrible customer support attitude.
Sign up at your own peril. But I refuse to give these Bernie Madoff types $25 of my hard earned money to be ripped off yet again.
|
01-11-09 09:55am
|
Reply
24
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from TrashMan:
One third of the movies I viewed on the site have no audio. Whats up with that?
Then some girls have videos listed, but when you click the link to the video there are neither links to stream or download the video (e.g. one video from Adara Star).
|
01-10-09 08:56pm
|
Reply
25
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from Thedebilman666:
How come only this review got the attention of the webmaster? It would've been nice to get a thank you for my promotional review...
|
01-29-11 04:17pm
|
