| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
James Deen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from KayTBuffs:
(careylowell's Reply)
I don't think it's a conspiracy. I also don't think it's coincidence that his critical words are only to female members. My previous reply while sarcastic in tone wasn't sarcastic. With him being an older man, I do believe he believes women shouldn't be here reviewing with the men.
|
04-28-20 09:11pm
|
Reply
2
|
James Deen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from KayTBuffs:
(careylowell's Reply)
I replied but received an invalid screen. The site must have timed out.
I didn't say what he said was fake. I am aware of the accusations. The beginning of my review says I read a story about James Deen years ago and how he was the boy next door in porn. The story is still online. James Deen boy next door it's on abcnews.
The problem I have is with him calling me naive. It's not the first time he has said something like this to me. I reviewed a site called Fucking Glasses and gave it a 65. I signed up for a full membership at full price and they only gave me trial access. They didn't respond to my emails. LKLK replied, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them." I could download 2 scenes. The site later apologized and fixed the problem. I raised the score by 20 points.
He had no problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site.
He doesn't tell the other members to overcome their bitterness when they're getting ripped off.
Maybe that's just me being naive? I should stand in the other room while the men talk? Maybe I'll find the word misogynistic in the dictionary while waiting to be allowed to have an opinion.
|
04-27-20 11:20am
|
Reply
3
|
James Deen
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from KayTBuffs:
(careylowell's Reply)
There's more to this than whether what he said is fake or not. I rated this site 36th of 42 sites I have reviewed. The ones below it are mostly sites that ripped me off. Yet, he calls me naive. The comment I made about James Deen size was an insult. It's also a reality in the field I work in that some women do lie. If accusations matter that much, maybe a search of the internet for, "Porn producer accused of abusing models" should be done? There are 1.7 million results. There's just a feeling from me that LKLK has a problem with women reviewing.
In a previous review of Fucking Glasses, he called me bitter, "But overcome your bitterness, and try to get your money's worth from the sites, since you've already paid for them."
I had scored that site a 65 because I paid full price and they only gave me trial access. It went from being able to download all scenes to only being able to download 2 scenes. The site also wouldn't reply to emails until I posted the review. They then replied to the emails and apologized saying it was a sign-up error. They extended my account for another month and I raised their score to 85.
Here's the question. Why didn't LKLK or his other account have a problem with rearadmiral's much more favorable review of James Deen's site? Which was posted during the time the accusations were fresh (2 years ago).
Why doesn't he reply to reviews or comments that are getting ripped off and tell them to overcome their bitterness?
If I wasn't so naive, I would say he's a little misogynistic towards women reviewing porn.
|
04-27-20 11:06am
|
Reply
4
|
English Lads
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
The thing is they also don't state what the download charges are. I would imagine the Premium videos go for a much higher rate. I welcome any member of this site or the site owners to come here to comment or explain why they do what they do.
|
10-01-19 08:26am
|
Reply
5
|
All Anal
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(careylowell's Reply)
Agreed. I find the close-ups to be a bit annoying too.
|
09-03-19 03:31am
|
Reply
6
|
A Girl Knows
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(careylowell's Reply)
THANKS FOR THE COMPLIMENT.
APPRECIATED.
YOU SOMETIMES WONDER IF ANYONE READS THESE REVIEWS.
YEARS AGO, THERE WERE MORE REPLIES BY THE MEMBERS, SO YOU KNEW, AT LEAST, THAT SOMEONE OTHER THAN THE PU STAFF WERE READING THEM.
LOL.
|
02-27-19 01:20pm
|
Reply
7
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from skippy:
(careylowell's Reply)
Well that really sucks. Not sure what happened but I've been a member of this site a couple of times and have never been scammed. I am also not at all sure how you got to Rocketgate/VXNBill because Epoch was their servicer for me. In fact, I just cancelled my account and got exactly the expected service from Epoch. Entered in account and email and the subscription popped right up. 30 seconds later, it was cancelled. BTW, Rocketgate is still servicing a lot of sites like the Met Art sites. I do see that vxnbill is associated with this group of sites but I've never used them. Again, sorry you had an issue.
|
12-08-18 03:19pm
|
Reply
8
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from yujin:
(careylowell's Reply)
This is the first time we've heard of this type of issue with this biller. We'll reach out and double check to make sure, but it seems unlikely a major biller like Rocketgate would be involved.
|
12-04-18 02:45pm
|
Reply
9
|
Boy Crush
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rearadmiral:
(careylowell's Reply)
That makes a lot of sense. I've heard of women who do porn to increase their earnings as a stripper. Having porn as a background can probably earn both men and women a lot more money in other parts of the sex industry.
|
08-26-18 04:39am
|
Reply
10
|
Boy Crush
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
As I state in my review, the reason to join is for the many videos from the past. I do agree with you about the quality of models for the most part. They have found some cuties recently who have kept their pubes intact. The problem is they are now run by a Euro Porn type outfit who wants all their models to shave and act the same.
Staxus is a decent site, but it also has many of the same problems as does BC.
As for outdoor scenes, I never liked them as I noticed the flies and bees bothering the poor models. Imagine getting stung on a very sensitive area.
BTW, it also helps to join BC when they have a sale of only $14.95. I don't see paying $25 a month for a site that doesn't update like they used to.
BC is a B grade studio nowadays but it does have enough to merit a rating in the high 70s/low 80s for me. It will need to improve to go back to being a topnotch studio and site to receive a score higher than 90.
|
08-24-18 10:27am
|
Reply
11
|
EU Twinks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
Some of the sites show all the other sites included in Gay Hub while others don't. Others show model lists while others take you immediately to the order board. Blake Mason's site will only allow you to join their site even though all their videos are included in Gay Hub.
As I state in my review there is a lot to like and a lot to dislike here. I had to round the rating to an even 75. Not great but not so bad either.
They do have thousands of videos and not all their models are listed when you do join. But the fun is in the searching of sites like these...
|
07-04-18 08:20am
|
Reply
12
|
Boys Fuck Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
The site comprises of older videos as the models appear in the Mike 18 sites frequently. They were made when CRT computers ruled the land. The quality of the videos varies as many appear to be taken from old VHS tapes. Mike himself should be in his thirties by now.
|
04-15-18 08:47am
|
Reply
13
|
Boys Fuck Teens
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
That is why I say buyer beware as it is a bit high for a site like this. They might have some decent video files but it is hard to say with no true preview. It is owned by the same owners of Mike 18 and Fuck Hot Boys if that helps.
|
04-14-18 07:35am
|
Reply
14
|
Fuck Hot Boys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
I joined as I am redoing all of my DVDs and there are some decent twink models. It is worth $10, but not any more to join for a month.
|
04-14-18 07:33am
|
Reply
15
|
Helix Studios.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
The sale is over for now. They do have sales in the future so you can join at $15 or so. I have a discounted rate because I joined when I became a member of Helix. (I renew 8teenboy but not Helix as Helix is too expensive for what they offer.)
I also had joined Helix when it was having a special. You might want to rejoin Helix when they have one of their specials as you will be able to join 8teenboy at a discount of $14.95 a month like I did.
|
02-17-18 10:02am
|
Reply
16
|
Helix Studios.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
There is a 40% discount on 8teenboy.com right now for Valentine's Day. Definitely worth it at that price. :)
|
02-12-18 08:56am
|
Reply
17
|
Straight Naked Thugs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
Thank you, careylowell. Wiley is one of my all time favorite models.
|
02-10-18 08:20am
|
Reply
18
|
Helix Studios.net
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
Some of the older videos made by 8teenboy are still available. The new site is really good but it is not listed here yet so I can't review it. Wait for a deal to join as I did.
If you join Helix at a deal, they usually offer membership with 8teenboy with a deal as well. The problem is you pay a $5 preview charge for three days before being able to download anything. My membership to 8teenboy costs only $15 a month.
|
01-02-18 09:37am
|
Reply
19
|
Lust Cinema
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from lk2fireone:
NICE REVIEW.
I ALSO APPRECIATE YOUR TIP ABOUT UPGRADING MY ESTATE VALUE BECAUSE OF MY INCREASING AGE.
ANYTHING I CAN DO TO HELP MY HEIRS WILL BE APPRECIATED BY THEM WHEN THE GREAT DAY COMES WHEN I MEET MY MAKER IN THE SKIES ABOVE.
LOL.
PS: NICE TO SEE YOU WRITING REVIEWS AGAIN.
|
12-03-17 03:15pm
|
Reply
20
|
Doggy Boys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
The site owner had contacted me to tell me he was improving it and asked me to make some changes to my review which I did. I have since rejoined the site and realized most of the changes were cosmetic. I also felt we are reviewers and should not change what we write no matter how critical it is to the site. We can add comments about the changes, but the original review should stay.
It is kind of you to read my reviews as I read others (including for straight sites). I want everyone to know my reviews are for them and if the owners want to use them to improve it is fine with me. But the reviews are for users such as yourself and not the owners.
|
11-29-17 10:40am
|
Reply
21
|
Low Art Films
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(careylowell's Reply)
THANKS FOR THE VOTE OF CONFIDENCE.
YOU SHOULD BE WRITING MORE REVIEWS YOURSELF.
SOME OF YOUR PAST REVIEWS WERE FINE: HUMOR, NICE DETAILS, NICE OPINIONS.
AND YOU MIGHT WIN THE WEEKLY RAFFLE AS A BONUS.
|
11-16-17 07:14am
|
Reply
22
|
Submissived
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from lk2fireone:
I BELIEVE THIS REVIEW MERITS AT LEAST 2 STARS, AND IS WORTH 2 TICKETS IN THIS WEEK'S RAFFLE.
THE REVIEW IS THOUGHT-PROVOKING, AND ONE OF THE BEST OF ITS KIND.
LET'S GIVE JUSTICE TO WHERE IT'S DUE.
|
09-18-17 01:51am
|
Reply
23
|
Submissived
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from Jay G:
The pros outweigh the cons only slightly, but the bottom line is more accurate than anything I ever wrote.
|
09-17-17 10:12pm
|
Reply
24
|
Submissived
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from lk2fireone:
WOW!
SHORTEST REVIEW I EVER READ.
LOL.
|
09-17-17 01:22pm
|
Reply
25
|
Jurassic Cock
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from lk2fireone:
(careylowell's Reply)
I'VE NEVER REALLY THOUGHT ABOUT IT.
I DO KNOW I'VE TRIED READING LARGE-SIZED BOOKS MANY TIMES.
SOME OF THEM WERE COPIES OF BOOKS I HAVE ENJOYED READING IN THE PAST.
BUT FOR SOME REASON, THERE WAS NO PLEASURE IN READING THE LARGE-SIZED BOOK VERSION.
BUT I THINK THE FONT STYLE MIGHT BE WHY I DID NOT ENJOY THE LARGE-PRINT BOOKS.
I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THIS UNTIL YOU POINTED IT OUT.
I MUST BE DUMB, IN A WAY.
BUT I CAN ACCEPT THAT. BECAUSE IT'S THE WAY I AM, AND I CAN'T CHANGE IT.
|
07-04-17 11:34pm
|
