| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Low Art Films
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(careylowell's Reply)
THANKS FOR THE VOTE OF CONFIDENCE.
YOU SHOULD BE WRITING MORE REVIEWS YOURSELF.
SOME OF YOUR PAST REVIEWS WERE FINE: HUMOR, NICE DETAILS, NICE OPINIONS.
AND YOU MIGHT WIN THE WEEKLY RAFFLE AS A BONUS.
|
11-16-17 07:14am
|
Reply
52
|
Lust Cinema
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from lk2fireone:
NICE REVIEW.
I ALSO APPRECIATE YOUR TIP ABOUT UPGRADING MY ESTATE VALUE BECAUSE OF MY INCREASING AGE.
ANYTHING I CAN DO TO HELP MY HEIRS WILL BE APPRECIATED BY THEM WHEN THE GREAT DAY COMES WHEN I MEET MY MAKER IN THE SKIES ABOVE.
LOL.
PS: NICE TO SEE YOU WRITING REVIEWS AGAIN.
|
12-03-17 03:15pm
|
Reply
53
|
Mike 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
There are a lot of cute models which is why I give it some points. But the negatives outweigh the good in the case of this rather large company. If one has not ever been to this site, then one or two is enough. And yes, the price is high for a recurring fee especially because of the small number of videos as well as recycling and quality.
|
06-09-16 09:09am
|
Reply
54
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from Monahan:
Being 29.95 Euros, the cost of this site can vary in US$ terms (they charge your credit card in Euros, they say.) Right now it's about US$42.00. Also, their preview site claims on one place that there are 18 sites in the network, and, in another, 13 sites.
In any case I really liked the review. It told me everything I wanted to know and, because I like the same things, I'm seriously considering joining up.
|
06-06-09 10:12am
|
Reply
55
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from rome476:
(careylowell's Reply)
i agree 100%; it amazes me that with all the sites available there are almost no real orgy sites.
|
02-18-09 04:44pm
|
Reply
56
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from rome476:
Thank for the excellant review. I really like group/orgies material(not gangbangs) and I have liked the DSO and MSP DVDs I have seen but the site price has kept me from signing up as well as the lack of any nonfetish sites in the network. Fullyclothedsex and ironically "Myfetish" seem ok; are these still being updated?
Also, any ideas for other orgy sites?
|
01-24-09 01:03pm
|
Reply
57
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from elephant:
Nice review, site not for me neither, found myself screaming for the girls to get naked, fully clothed sex isn't what I like, but its a niche market and theres obvious thousands who love it.
|
01-24-09 01:24am
|
Reply
58
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from Wittyguy:
Thanks for the review on this one. I was a member a few years ago and, being a picture person, was somewhat disappointed in the smallish picture sizes. From some of the free thumbnails I've seen it looks like the pics have gotten bigger so I was wondering what pixel size their stuff is coming in at now a days.
|
01-22-09 01:51pm
|
Reply
59
|
Orgy Max
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from mbaya:
Very nicely written. This site is not for me, but you did a good job of being descriptive using creative vocabulary. Loved the review.
|
01-22-09 12:08am
|
Reply
60
|
Sean Cody
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
That is so true of this company. I will rewrite the review to indicate this as they did make sure the free publicity caused many to click onto their site.
I have been rewriting a lot of my older reviews and this is in need of an update. Thank you for your comment.
|
12-03-16 10:04am
|
Reply
61
|
Straight Naked Thugs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
Thank you, careylowell. Wiley is one of my all time favorite models.
|
02-10-18 08:20am
|
Reply
62
|
Submissived
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from lk2fireone:
I BELIEVE THIS REVIEW MERITS AT LEAST 2 STARS, AND IS WORTH 2 TICKETS IN THIS WEEK'S RAFFLE.
THE REVIEW IS THOUGHT-PROVOKING, AND ONE OF THE BEST OF ITS KIND.
LET'S GIVE JUSTICE TO WHERE IT'S DUE.
|
09-18-17 01:51am
|
Reply
63
|
Submissived
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from Jay G:
The pros outweigh the cons only slightly, but the bottom line is more accurate than anything I ever wrote.
|
09-17-17 10:12pm
|
Reply
64
|
Submissived
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from lk2fireone:
WOW!
SHORTEST REVIEW I EVER READ.
LOL.
|
09-17-17 01:22pm
|
Reply
65
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(careylowell's Reply)
LOLOL,
Well glad you said hi.
hehe
|
12-06-11 10:06pm
|
Reply
66
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from Cybertoad:
I resemble that 45 year old mean comment LOL
|
11-20-11 08:43am
|
Reply
67
|
Teens Boys World
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from merc77:
(careylowell's Reply)
I guess I'm not too surprised as the site started to recycle older material. Perhaps it will sell its content to Enigmatic Boys which appears to be identical in style.
|
06-18-17 10:11am
|
Reply
68
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from skippy:
(careylowell's Reply)
Well that really sucks. Not sure what happened but I've been a member of this site a couple of times and have never been scammed. I am also not at all sure how you got to Rocketgate/VXNBill because Epoch was their servicer for me. In fact, I just cancelled my account and got exactly the expected service from Epoch. Entered in account and email and the subscription popped right up. 30 seconds later, it was cancelled. BTW, Rocketgate is still servicing a lot of sites like the Met Art sites. I do see that vxnbill is associated with this group of sites but I've never used them. Again, sorry you had an issue.
|
12-08-18 03:19pm
|
Reply
69
|
Vixen.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from yujin:
(careylowell's Reply)
This is the first time we've heard of this type of issue with this biller. We'll reach out and double check to make sure, but it seems unlikely a major biller like Rocketgate would be involved.
|
12-04-18 02:45pm
|
Reply
70
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from badandy400:
(careylowell's Reply)
Usually you can figure it would from looking at replies to your reviews. The person that seems hostile towards your comments is usually the person it ends up being.
Without doing some creative digging, and a lot of it, I do not think even the staff can tell you who it was. If I recall correctly I believe they said some time ago that the anonymous ID is saved in a one way encryption to protect the privacy. I believe it was the trusts they were talking about.
In any event, it does not hurt to guess who it was and send a reply to them. Even if they have not been around for a while they could still get the notice email for receiving a reply. This might bring them back, you never know and it certainly does not hurt. Besides, who wants that one bad trust thing floating around.
|
07-11-09 11:12pm
|
Reply
71
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from badandy400:
(careylowell's Reply)
Okay, I just really wanted to be sure about this. Thanks for the reply. Do you have any idea who the "NO' trust came from. One of the things a few of us have been trying to do lately is getting people who voted no a while back to reconsider in the even the user has improved reviews since the NO trust and is still around. Anyway, you may want to add an extra reply to that trust just to make it clear.
|
07-11-09 07:14pm
|
Reply
72
|
What Boys Want
(0)
|
Reply of
careylowell's Review
from badandy400:
This may or may not pertain to this review, but I need to ask you something.
I was just looking around and for no reason clicked on your name. I noticed you had a single "NO" trust and I was curious as to what it was for. The person believed you did not join some of the sites you had reviewed. You replied saying "I joined seven of the nine sites mentioned for at least one month. No review based on a trial m'ship."
Is this statement implying that you had not joined them two of them, or simply that you joined and left before a second month. The distinction is very important. If you had not joined them how could you review them? Also, which of the nine sites DID you join? At this point I think it is just poor choice of wording, but it is unclear.
I am a little reluctant to throw out a "NO" trust on you because your more recent reviews seem much more in depth and honest. I would like some clarification on this just in case there is a misunderstanding. It was not that long ago a reviewer had all his review points removed and was semi-suspended for implying that he did not join sites he had reviewed. I do not want this to happen to you, but I (all of PU) need to know that you have actually joined all the sites you have reviewed.
|
07-11-09 12:45am
|
Reply
73
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from dracken:
(careylowell's Reply)
Sometimes the forums do offer more details. If you ask woodman usually answers within a few days (I think you can join the forums independently and free) But also the site has some hardcore scenes that can be linked to the initiations and castings. Overall a pretty good site if you like to see castings/ the same girls doing hardcore.
|
06-11-10 04:48pm
|
