| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
The latter is something brand new, Squirrel. When I was still a subscriber they didn't offer the extra channels. I really can't see where that would be of any benefit to anyone if one has to pay for them. They don't appear to be cheap.
|
03-31-09 07:08pm
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Monahan:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
"... if they are underhand enough to do the other 5, how do you know you're safe in giving them your credit card details?..."
That's why I deal only with sites that use CCBill and Epoch because the site owners are not given any credit card details.
If you don't want to renew a membership all you need to do is go online with ccbill.com or epoch.com and tell them to cancel. Your losses are thus limited to what was already processed.
If a site uses another billing/payment service or does it themselves, you proceed at your own risk.
|
03-28-09 08:27am
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Wittyguy:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Amen brother!
|
03-27-09 03:02pm
|
Reply
279
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
For quality, Kink.com is heads and shoulders above the rest, except for their desire to often set their scenes in dingy dungeons (but that's part of their Kink).
The Fetish Network really seems to be a collection of separate and mostly small websites that include many "one man operations" from all over the world (Germany & Japan are well represented) and old spanking and fetish films transferred to video (Pure Spanking & Perfect Spanking).
Elite spanking seems to be a collection of used video from Germany's Spanking Server site and is, at least, has better lighting than the many dark spanking sites.
The old stuff with poorer quality does give me the nostalgic thrill, however, of when I first saw kinky videos a few decades ago and they were like a naughty and forbidden peek into something very private and personal.
|
03-25-09 04:10am
|
Reply
280
|
NS All Access
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from wiild1:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I sent a similar mail but Epoch referred me to the webmaster and I can't find the webmasters mail address....I will give up on this site and sign up with one of their competitors instead.
|
03-23-09 01:55pm
|
Reply
281
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Denner:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
BTW: Just edited my very early trust for The Squirrel - see it if you like - and it's not much, just a well deserved new one of the kind....
|
03-18-09 12:15pm
|
Reply
282
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks, Squirrel..
If any doubt - check the preview...
It may take a little time to ajust to the navigation, but when you have done that, I'm sure you'll be more satisfied with this, than both Videobox and New Sensations - NS is according to my experience way behind in video-quality...
But bottomline - take the chance - for 17.95 - not that I'm promoting the site in anyway - but, man - I like it much better than Videobox - and I've found some tremendous stuff, I've never found anywhere else...just browse, bro....
|
03-18-09 11:39am
|
Reply
283
|
Spanked Cutie
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks, Squirrel, as usual a good idea. Nothing ventured nothing gained, I guess. Wrote that email and am waiting with ticket number 1237129652
|
03-15-09 08:02am
|
Reply
284
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Goldfish:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I think most of us join sites that we expect to like so the 80-84 average doesn't surprise me.
|
03-15-09 07:17am
|
Reply
285
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Yes, I see Talk Back badge and my Trust vote registered.
Thanks for the heads up. You have a good eye for detail.
Regards.
|
03-12-09 07:39pm
|
Reply
286
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
What kind of badge does he have? When I look at his profile, I see no badges. Maybe you meant he has a club (to hit PU miscreants over the head with).
Actually, when I look at his profile, it does not show any Trust votes, not even mine.
|
03-12-09 07:24pm
|
Reply
287
|
Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Khan:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
For now, we're going to leave them ... along with the many replies made by the regular users here. We feel this will actually serve as a better warning than giving the site a clean/blank slate.
We reserve the right to revisit this decision at a later time.
|
03-12-09 07:20pm
|
Reply
288
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RagingBuddhist:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Very well put. For some reason, I never stopped to think about all the people who simply don't join and therefore can't rate the site. Now the numbers make sense - sort of. I guess it's all subjective to begin with but, to me, if you have more than three or four cons, a site still couldn't rate in the high 90's.
|
03-11-09 11:47am
|
Reply
289
|
Black Cream White Ass
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Wittyguy:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I like the idea of a "CIA covet" operation, it definitely has Biblical implications ... sort of what canceling might be like here. This one caught my eye because it has a 3 day trial which is usually enough time to cancel. If this offer is still around in a week or two I might test the waters after digging through the fine print on the sign-up page and confirming that they use a reliable billing processor.
|
03-11-09 11:47am
|
Reply
290
|
Real Spankings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Yes, as usual, you are right on target.
|
03-11-09 05:11am
|
Reply
291
|
Real Spankings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Jay G:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Always enjoy information from you. I actually like a belt or paddle to a clothed girl, especially on tight jeans. But, then, I guess it's different strokes for different folks, LOL.
|
03-10-09 07:36pm
|
Reply
292
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Jay G:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Agree with you, squirrel, but in my fantasy world I could check-out videos with a little ass slapping without digging through other fetish content I don't care for (to each his own, but digging through latex, foot fetish, pissing, etc., isn't my cup of tea, LOL).
|
03-10-09 12:08pm
|
Reply
293
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Jay G:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks, squirrel. I definately am joining. My only regret is that there's no specific "spanking" as a category, although I've seen an ass or two slapped in some of their videos. If this had spanking, I think I'd need no other sites.
|
03-09-09 10:40am
|
Reply
294
|
Horny Euro Sluts
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Thanks Squirrel, one of the other sites included in the network that came with Zoliboy besides this one is Fassinating, which is another hardcore mostly Euros only site, and it has several other HC sites that I think are mostly made up of DVD content available on most DVD sites. Fassinating was rated an 83 by TBP, so it too is a good solid HC site.
|
03-02-09 01:04pm
|
Reply
295
|
Real Spankings
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Review from Tree Rodent:
As a quick follow up to the review and because I do like to get things right, I would like to add that Mr. M finally makes a few appearances in the new studio clips. Not before time, and the whole site goes down the plughole.
|
02-27-09 04:40pm
|
Reply
296
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
I was a member a couple of years ago, so you can consider my information dated.
But there were very little tatoos on the models. Most girls are tatoo-free, the others are only modestly tatooed.
This is a mega-site for teens.
-5,600+ models
-1.4+ million pix
-1,400 vids
The quality of the pix is mainly good. The clarity (focus) of the pix is mainly good, the colors of the pix are mainly OK to good. The quality of the pix is not as good as Met-art or MPL Studios, but the quality is still decent for a lot of the pix.
The attractiveness of the models varies, but they do have a lot of the top European models on this site.
The vids I downloaded as a member were mainly soft core solo shoots of each model. There is hardcore on the site, both pix and vids, but as I said before, I'm not into vids that much because it's really hard to find attractively shot vids; quality photo shoots are just easier to make, for a variety of reasons: lighting, make-up, dialog (hearing these models speak destroys the illusion of glamor or style you want them to have), etc.
I do agree that the search feature is poor. I honestly do not know why these mega sites can not have a simple, easy to use search like met-art. Another problem is that different models can have the same name, which adds to the confusion. And the same model can have different names.
I think Teen Dreams is definitely worth joining at least once, to check out the massive collection of models, pix, and vids that are available.
But if you have specific desires that don't fit the simple criteria of a a mega teen site with a lot of pix and vids, then you are better off looking elsewhere to spend your time and money.
|
02-27-09 08:39am
|
Reply
297
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Reg Berkeley:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Download speeds are a complicated issue. You could be 3000 miles apart and get a better download rate than 2 servers 500 miles apart. It depends on the networking and switching in between.
We actually built our own proprietary download system that does a bunch of cool threading.
Regarding the recognition...we obviously love it. Our following is small but devoted. But porn enthusiasts seem to really dig and appreciate what we do, even if it goes right over the heads of most review sites. The praise of guys like you, Clyde, Messmer and Toad really means so much.
I will tell you this much. The review sites think you guys are stupid and will watch/download whatever is mindlessly put in front of you. They see zero value in our commentary. I refuse to accept this and promise to keep up our high standards, as well as topnotch customer service.
Rock on,
Reg
|
02-25-09 03:07pm
|
Reply
298
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Wittyguy:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Actually, there's a good tat ration here. Only a few and they tend to be more modest. As for the vids, can't really help you there. Most of the solo vids are in the 10 to 15 minute range if that helps at all.
|
02-25-09 10:31am
|
Reply
299
|
American Vice
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Yep, I agree. I think that once people try the site it WILL take off. Right now VideoBox has the edge by sheer volume but when it comes to variety American Vice has them beat already. And thanks!
|
02-24-09 03:44pm
|
Reply
300
|
Anal Teen Angels
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from number1zero:
(Tree Rodent's Reply)
Well if it's not officialy open then they shouldn't open it untill it is. If im payinf 30+ bucks a month it better be "open"
|
02-22-09 12:45pm
|
