| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from TheBrickster:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thanks for the info. I definitely agree, the "Hunt" is definitely the best part. :-)
|
12-18-15 08:43am
|
Reply
452
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from TheBrickster:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Thank you for the reply. I am familiar with those sites and I have been a member of Wow Porn, Babes and Met-Art.
My one issue (more of a thought than a legit complaint) is I would like to see this glamcore presentation applied to women OTHER than your stereotypical Hot teen/early 20s woman. There is Pure Mature for older ladies, but where is the glamcore Asian site? or BBW site? I like all different types of smut and it would be nice to see the elegant presentation applied to other niches. I'm sure there are BBW fans, for example, that would enjoy seeing their favorite peformers presented as the divine sexual objects that glamcore excels at.
I think of Tushy and Blacked as glamcore sites, so it's encouraging to see studios are beginning to expand the palette a bit.
Thank you again for the reccomendations.
|
12-17-15 01:35pm
|
Reply
453
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
from TheBrickster:
Fantastic review. You answered all of the possible questions I would have about the site.
What other glamcore sites do you like?
|
12-17-15 11:45am
|
Reply
454
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from skippy:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yesterday the option changed again to "Thanks for using our public beta. Click here to set this as default" but there was no way to go back to the "classic format". Fortunately, there is a setting in "options" that allows you to set your default to "classic". This works, but my browser spends a lot of time switching from the now global-default new format to my personal setting classic format.
I would not mind the new format so much if it provided me with one-row per day (i.e. 4 sets) like the old one did, if it used the same naming conventions and if I could do the same things in the same number of clicks. (i.e. download a zip file) Both formats leave huge amounts of unused space on the sides. If the goal was to provide larger thumbnails, just take up some of that unused space.
|
12-14-15 08:39am
|
Reply
455
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from mbaya:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
In spite if its flaws, this site is well deserving of a 99. I does so much so well that it can make you overlook where it is weak.
|
12-13-15 04:30pm
|
Reply
456
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from sonofzog:
I haven't checked on DD for a long time but went looking when I discovered they had shot some Blake Eden / Blake Bartelli. Wow. They used to be one of the more affordable glamour sites but now? Disappointing.
|
10-20-15 03:45pm
|
Reply
457
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from WeeWillyWinky:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I know, lk2fireone, I was grinding my own particular axe at your expense (pun intended).
Believe me, I understand having to budget one's self for this kind of entertainment.
This is a BIG issue for me, and I think I might start a thread in our forum about it: the concept of value in light of the Internet, and how ideas of value have changed dramatically in the last few decades.
Sorry, mate! You're right, and I was just being an (_!_)
|
09-19-15 08:01pm
|
Reply
458
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from WeeWillyWinky:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
And, lest I be accused of not having to care about money - in my current job I make 19 cents above Arizona's minimum wage, and I have to share digs with my brother to make ends meet.
Also should note: I'm aware that works in the public domain can be downloaded for free on any number of sites in any number of file types.
Sorry, this is an obvious sore spot for me.
|
09-18-15 02:32am
|
Reply
459
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from WeeWillyWinky:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
The idea that 30 dollars is considered "expensive" for a month's access to a HUGE amount of adult entertainment - that would have cost you thousands and thousands of dollars a relatively short time ago (say twenty years - if they even had content this good then, which they obviously didn't) - is proof to me of just how jaded people are becoming, and how upside down the concept of value has become in these modern times.
Another example is, and this is just one - Amazon Kindle. I can download enough classic literature to last me a hundred lifetimes for FREE. Or, if I want tables of contents and other nifty things, I can pony up a dollar, or two dollars, for the complete works of Thomas Hardy, Charles Dickens, Aquinas, Chaucer, Shakespeare, etc. BUT - if I want to download a modern-day piece of literary ephemera - any one of a thousand crime novels, romance novels, fantasy/sci-fi novels, self-help books, etc, I will pay at least ten to fifteen dollars. The worst part is, the more useless the book, the more expensive it is - say for instance some university-educated simpleton's book-length navel-gazing excreta about the poetry of Derek Walcott (one of the greatest living English-language poets) sells on Amazon for upwards of two hundred dollars - if you want the "prestigious" cheaply-printed hard or soft cover - while the actual poetry of Derek Walcott sells for the price of your average crappy dimestore-quality "best-seller".
Not to single you out, like2fireone, but 30 dollars for ANY high quality content of this nature is highway robbery, and it's YOU robbing THEM, not the other way 'round.
|
09-18-15 02:23am
|
Reply
460
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from WeeWillyWinky:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
sorry - double posted.
|
09-18-15 02:22am
|
Reply
461
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Amanda:
The listing has been updated to show the actual price on the join page. Thanks for the head's up! :)
|
09-16-15 11:38am
|
Reply
462
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from elephant:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Yeah it is a shame I agree, hope they get a discount again here.
Look around though, there are other sites, just seen one that has a deal for 100 days for $39.99 which is tempting me very much.
|
09-16-15 09:58am
|
Reply
463
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Oh yeah I get why its happened and one of them things but was just thinking it was sad to see when I rank it as one of the alltime best I've been a member of. I wish other studios would take a leaf out of FTVgirls book and start having more fun and better clothes and makeup, FTVgirls are spot on with me when it comes to dressing girls in a natural way.
|
09-16-15 09:19am
|
Reply
464
|
8 Teenies
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Amanda:
Yes, both sites appear to be closed. We're updating our listings. Thanks for the head's up!
|
08-27-15 10:54am
|
Reply
465
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from Monahan:
Just got the same deal. I signed up. I mean how can you go wrong at this price.
|
08-14-15 10:00pm
|
Reply
466
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RagingBuddhist:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I'm basically a video person myself. But, every once in a while I'll join a picture site just for a change of pace. I agree - the videos here aren't all that.
I have a 42" LCD television as my main monitor but I'm well aware that the resolution isn't as good as an actual computer monitor. But I also have a 27" monitor and the problem, as I see it anyway, still shows up. No, not so much when I'm viewing a whole picture on either screen, but when I zoom in a bit, there are the distortions.
|
07-03-15 12:13am
|
Reply
467
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from sonofzog:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
It's been awhile since I was subscribing to Wow Girls but as I recall, after paying for 30 days I was automatically registered to use Wow Porn and after 60 days I had access to the third site.
As I cull my porn collection I note that a lot of my favorite videos came from Wow Girls/Porn etc. I'm seriously thinking of going back. I do find some of the navigation annoying; if I'm looking at multiple pages of one model and look at a video, I do not want to be sent all the way back to page 1, especially if I've gotten to page 3 or later.
The distribution across three sites also makes it more of a challenge to dl all the desirable videos of one particular model.
|
06-24-15 02:36pm
|
Reply
468
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Only Tease, Only Silk and Satin, Only Secretaries, Only Opaques, Pinup Wow, Sophia's Sexy Leg Wear, College-Uniform, Office Fantasy, Tease-X, Layered Nylons, Hayley's Secrets ...
These are all stripping sites. Seems like there's a market for it.
|
05-02-15 01:17am
|
Reply
469
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Wittyguy:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
They were fun but it took a lot (and I mean a lot) of time to put together and I just haven't had time to spare the last few years. Additionally, the "pickings" have dropped off quite a bit the last few years as the forum has really quieted down.
|
04-29-15 01:52pm
|
Reply
470
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from BrighamXart:
Hope you like our new, lower pricing! :-)
$19.99/month recurring
$29.95/month non recurring
and $99.95 for 1 year, non recurring - the best value for sure, just $8.33 per month
Cheers,
Brig & Colette from X-Art
|
04-20-15 08:48pm
|
Reply
471
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from BrighamXart:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
Hi lk2fireone ~
Thank you so much for your positive comments and feedback on X-Art.
As co-founders and owners of the site, we are always grateful to hear from happy customers!
Cheers!
Brigham and Colette
X-Art and Colette [dot] com
|
04-11-15 03:00pm
|
Reply
472
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
from BrighamXart:
Hello lk2fireone ~
Thank you for your feedback regarding our pricing.
Colette and I take your comments to heart.
We decide to go back to our very inexpensive, super simple pricing options that we used when we launched the site...
$19.99/month recurring
$29.95/month non recurring
and $99.95 for 1 year, non recurring - the best value for sure, just $8.33 per month
Hope you'll check out our new content and improved pricing!
Thank you again.
Cheers,
Brig and Colette
Co-Owners
X-Art and Colette dot [com]
|
04-11-15 02:41pm
|
Reply
473
|
Twistys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
I'm amazed at the number of companies that provide an email address for contact but don't monitor it. I'm glad you got your issue resolved.
To be fair to Twisty's, they did solve it. And to be fair to MBI-Probiller they didn't have the information to solve it. When I called the toll-free number MBI gave me the problem was solved in less than 5 minutes because the woman at the other end of the phone could quickly determine that I didn't use the cam site and refunded the charges. I guess my beef is two-fold: Twisty's needs to tighten up their security a bit and MBI needs to give their online service reps some leeway to drop the upsells. Being offered a discount for a site I didn't join and was fraudulently hacked makes no sense!
|
03-24-15 06:02pm
|
Reply
474
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from LPee23:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
"I can be mildly disappointed when I find that some content from the site was removed. It's hard to determine if the removal was done at the request of the model, If done at the model's request, that shows a respect for the model."
Most of the time you don't know, and model's request is far from the most common reason. I can think of a few sites that have told me they did this at their request though. AbbyWinters.com is one well known example, where models can buy back their shoots if they want them down. It does show respect for the models, in keeping with the AW brand of being a model friendly site. I guess I can't blame them for it.
Then again, there are massive sites like 21sextury.com that have never taken anything down, despite certainly having received requests, and I can say I am definitely glad they have kept it all.
"On the other hand, there are so many past and future models, we should still appreciate the content that is available to us."
So true. Enough cannot be said for the models and producers still creating and distributing great content.
|
03-22-15 06:29pm
|
Reply
475
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from LPee23:
(lk2fireone's Reply)
You may be right. Someone posted elsewhere that they thought they remembered some of Galitsin's peeing shoots being posted on Metart, but they weren't sure because it was a long time ago. You seem to remember it clearly, so I will take your word for it.
|
03-22-15 02:53pm
|
