| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from Capn:
Only an impression from your review, but I feel this site may define that new 'heartcore' term?
From what I can see of it on a personal level, unfortunately I think I would find little here to keep me happy.
Midcore & hardcore does very little for me.
Cap'n. :0/
|
09-02-12 08:36am
|
Reply
102
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Khan:
(slutty's Reply)
I suspect the thread you're thinking of was:
What should a PU review include?
... but that's just an educated guess.
|
08-29-12 07:23am
|
Reply
103
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from gaypornolover:
Superb review - the gold standard I aspire to and haven't yet achieved! I gotta take some tips?
|
08-28-12 04:21pm
|
Reply
104
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from rearadmiral:
Great review! I hope that based on your review that more people will buy a membership and allow Wow Girls to make more pron. They really have a winning formula.
|
08-28-12 02:25pm
|
Reply
105
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from Denner:
Very nice review, slutty - very nice. And agree with both your score and your inputs....
This one from Diesel is probably the best from that company, so far. And even if the the amount is not that overwhelming - the content speaks for itself.
Never got around to make a review - but this time I'll let sluttys review speak for this user, too.........thumbs up!
|
08-28-12 06:17am
|
Reply
106
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from exotics4me:
(slutty's Reply)
That's alright on the humor part. I must not have caught the GB on it, meant MB. I do prefer the smaller videos and rarely download the HD versions just to save space. While I have quite a bit of space, it's starting to become a hassle trying to keep up with the different hard drives and what is on each one. I used to have a huge collection compared to most, but most of the newer PUs here are blowing me away in hard drive space, servers, I'm still under 10 TB total.
|
08-27-12 01:10pm
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(slutty's Reply)
Ditto. I've been burned by no-namers too often.
|
08-26-12 12:43am
|
Reply
108
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from elephant:
(slutty's Reply)
That is probably why yes, sadly the majority of porn fans don't like anal scenes what so ever and they do tend to kick off about it, I like a movie to be a mixture of both anal and vaginal, seems to work for me lol.
Hope they carry making more though, I've spotted a few on xart.
|
08-21-12 09:18am
|
Reply
109
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from exotics4me:
(slutty's Reply)
Would it make a huge difference in crispness if I have a high end PC? I just bought the one I'm using a few months ago and it has very high specs. Seems to make everything look really good. And I agree, I thought the filesizes looked really strange for 1920x1080 videos at 4000 bitrate. I haven't been back to the site after downloading all the photo sets, which are very good, but will stop back in and download the videos towards the end of my membership to at least give them a fair second chance before reviewing it.
|
08-20-12 11:36am
|
Reply
110
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from cjd2004:
(slutty's Reply)
They are mostly around 200-300MiB. Even though the bitrate is lower than other sites, I assume they have optimised the encoder settings, as the video is very good.
|
08-15-12 06:30am
|
Reply
111
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(slutty's Reply)
Hey slutty, I probably could have went into that deeper than I did and will in my review. One of the big selling points of Sex Art is that it is much more erotic than your average hardcore porn scene. Considering the scenes I downloaded are 1920x1080 quality, that would automatically make the file sizes bigger, but the scenes, to me, are extremely short to be sold as "erotic". Very little story, very little talking and the sex lasts 8-12 minutes. My complaint isn't so much with the file size as it is with the scenes being very short and not being very erotic, the filesize was used more to show just how short the scenes are. If it were a 640x480 resolution clip, I wouldn't think much about the smaller file size, but at true HD, it shows how short the scenes are by showing the smaller file size.
And what you ask at the end is the interesting part. The videos are very crisp, I mentioned maybe they are optimizing bitrates or using some kind of trick to get the best quality at a small filesize. The files are listing Codec: H264-MPEG4 AVC. Bitrate is 4215 kb/s. As an example of what I was saying, the video I got that info from is a solo video. The model is fully dressed and walking in her apartment/house, she is fully nude by 1:42. The entire scene is 8:38. I hate to beat a dead horse, but it seems like erotic videos would have more than 1:42 of fully dressed to fully nude, with teasing, stripping, etc...
|
08-13-12 10:30pm
|
Reply
112
|
Euro Teen Movs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lrn2spel:
(slutty's Reply)
I combed through my Spam filter carefully and revisited the tickets I had opened. No dice. I also tried checking the subscription directly on CCBill. Again, nada (worth the shot, though) I didn't take much issue with having "lost" the username/password since I had copy/pasted them into a blank field in my browser. It wasn't untilshortly after that I learned clipboard history was *not* a feature of Win7 (wtf?) that I contacted the vendor "support" and eventually CCBill.
Credit to CCBill for their prompt replies. The latest one, taking GPL's advice, came less than an hour after I launched a formal complaint. I'm to give their "technicians" 48 hours to rectify the issue after which they'll take more serious action (i.e. reimburse me).
As amazing as eastern European women are, I'm always skeptical when dealing with the region's businesses. For all I know, they're just all on summer holidays.
|
08-11-12 09:16pm
|
Reply
113
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
I agree with you that mikes review of VB would definetely be worth reading. He's been a member for 3 years so he must be a huge fan of the site. At best, I only visit the site a couple of times year a year.
|
08-08-12 04:44am
|
Reply
114
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from Drooler:
Yeah, I found out by joining Young Legal again, just a few days ago, that Wow Girls wasn't part of the deal.
Oh well, I'll probably join Wow Girls some time ...
No hurry!
|
08-07-12 01:00pm
|
Reply
115
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from Khan:
The TBP Editors have updated the price on the listing. Thx for the heads up.
|
08-07-12 08:24am
|
Reply
116
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
I think there is something wrong with posting a very negative comment
on the same day that it's happening because the comment will stay there for a long time and may have only been an issue on the day that it was posted.
I'd also like to add that nowhere did the poster write that his issue was with VB3 and not VB2. He wrote that part in a subsequent reply. Now it's quite possible that someone reading the negative comment will read all the replies and then see that it as to do with VB3 but then again maybe they will only read the comment and assume that it applies to VB as a whole.
Don't worry about debating with me. I like to debate.
|
08-07-12 05:14am
|
Reply
117
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from pat362:
(slutty's Reply)
It's not the posting that was the issue but the vocabulary that was used. The title of the thread is "A New Low". How exactly would a site being down be a new low? If he had just posted a comment asking other members to see if they had isse with VB3 or VB2 then I wouldn have been glad to check and confirm whether I saw the same problem but that's not what he did. He pretty much slammed what is essentially one of the highest rated sites on the net.
I welcome comments with important news because these can sometime be more up to date than any review but the comment must be constructive or it's only a bitch fest. I think if you want to bicth about something than use the forum. You can put a lot more info and it's more appropriate than the comment section.
|
08-06-12 07:05am
|
Reply
118
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Claypaws:
(slutty's Reply)
Thanks slutty. Not a waste of money at all and I would not blame anyone even it were. There is enough added to the Diesel Network in the last six months to justify a month's membership though I am having to download some video too to make it viable. It would be difficult from photos alone.
I have not had a reply to my follow up question from their customer support. Either their system does not prompt them for follow up replies or it might just be a time zone thing or it might be a case of "nothing more to say".
I would be much happier with this network if it simply made it clear exactly what the content is on each of the sites and what is included and what is not. It is not so much a matter of price as clarity. I do not mind paying when I have a good idea of what I am paying for.
I hope to write a review of the network at the end of my month. Despite my own somewhat lukewarm feelings about the site, I am likely to score it pretty high because it does do what it does well, once you can work out what it is trying to do.
|
08-01-12 08:06am
|
Reply
119
|
Homegrown Hairy Bush
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Willard:
(slutty's Reply)
This is fraud.
The kind person slutty, thank you.
They did not connect.
Support does not exist.
I mailed them twice.
I repented of having taught them my credit card number.
I connected with the credit card company and made my number change.
It is a charge.
And it takes one week.
I am very unpleasant.
They own two or more sites.
From now on, probably, someone suits the same eye as me.
How does the staff of dear TBP think?
|
07-30-12 07:03am
|
Reply
120
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(slutty's Reply)
My advice is to bump it waaaaaay up on your list now that it's combined with the other Diesel sites. This is exceptionally great porn.
|
07-24-12 07:41am
|
Reply
121
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from rearadmiral:
This is great news. Thanks for posting this.
|
07-22-12 04:41pm
|
Reply
122
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from lk2fireone:
So they dropped the monthly price by $10.
And they added access to the entire Diesel network for $10 more.
Both options make the site more attractive.
|
07-21-12 03:19am
|
Reply
123
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
from elephant:
Hi Slutty, this is great news and I'm really glad to hear that they have decided to do this, I think its a good move, more people will join for sure and more likely stay a member cause it will be value for money.
Thanks for the info.
|
07-21-12 12:52am
|
Reply
124
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from rearadmiral:
(slutty's Reply)
Yes - American Vice. That's the site I was thinking of. That was a great site and I'm sorry it closed.
|
07-18-12 03:46pm
|
Reply
125
|
Orgasms.xxx
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
from otoh:
Slutty, thanks for the helpful and informative review - this site is high on my list, so it good to read a bit more about it.
Despite the smaller size, I still think I'm leaning toward it more than to X-Art - mainly because Orgasms seems to have a broader age range of models, as opposed to X-Art's apparent heavy bias of 18-21.
As I mentioned to rearadmiral - if you like these sites, you may also want to try Joymii - another simiar site which I really enjoyed and reviewed recently.
|
07-01-12 05:02pm
|
