I've got you beat on the booze and raft because it didn't say what kind of books I had so I could have a "How to Build rafts for dummies" and "How to make stills for dummies" in my stash of books.
The girl thing would be really nice. Oh well, maybe there will be a yatch filled with Victoria Secret models that just sinks near the island and after I valantly rescue them all they feel the need to thank me repeatedly.
I'd just like to add my 2 cents as a prospective customer who has never actually joined yet.
One of the things that has always put me off about the site is the apparent navigation. I get the impression there is loads of content on the site (with some of the hottest performers in the industry), but the vast majority of it is very hard to find (and I'm impatient about trying to find scenes I like after I've joined a site). I don't care what date a scene was posted, but if I search for 'Eve Angel' for example, I'd like to find ALL her scenes in the same place (e.g. as thumbnails), not just her recent scenes from the last couple years.
Anyway, if the navigation issue is improved, there will be a far greater chance that I (and others) will try this mega-site out.
Thank you for your feedback!
Now that all sites are part of one network, we're not posting doubles, except for the extra Euro Girls on Girls sets on 1By-Day, and that's only to introduce the site to our members.
We're working hard on a merged network member area for ddfprod.com, to make it easier to browse all 10 sites at once. Hopefully you'll find it more user-friendly too!
Overall I liked the sites, but you are completely correct on the cross site doubles. They really need to let us know when a scene is posted more than one place.
Agree that video quality for the cam shows (the ones I was referring to) is poor. The video quality at their paysites are quite good, in contrast.
I assume that's because the girls shooting the cams are using low-quality, inexpensive cameras, as well as maybe being a function of the feed they are using (low bandwidth?--I am not technically inclined).
But for a free live cam show, that features a lot of nudity, some masturbation, sometimes sex between a model and a stunt cock, it might be worth checking out.
Depends on your tastes.
I have spent very little time watching these shows.
I've had the 5-month membership in the past, but I am currently on a special offer monthly subscription.
But I have access to all the Diesel Access network sites, and now with the new program, I now have access to the two Wow sites as well.
I like the videos and photosets at these sites, and the sites are much easier to use, because I don't have to hunt through a bunch of junk to find content that I like.
I don't like tattoos. Given how common they are for the models, it shouldn't be a factor, but I just don't like them. So I have no problem if this site (or whoever supplies the photosets) uses a bit of photoshopping to remove tattoos.
I know that different sites use photoshopping to remove birth marks (small colored markings) on some of their models. I think that photoshopping is more common than most people realize.
Cheers for the info slutty, yeah not too bothered about some of the solo models sites apart from Beata and I used to like Vika but not as much these days, I would mainly be joining for the main sites. Cheers anyway good to know they do update some of the sites.
If you join any 1 site in the network, and remain a continuous member, then, starting the 3rd month, you get access to all 14 sites in the network.
But it's cheaper to just join the network, if you really want to get access to all 14 sites. By joining the network instead of a single site, you get immediate access to all 14 sites. And the price of 3 months of a single site really adds up, so it's less expensive to join the network instead of a single site if you really want access to all the sites.
The wrath of Khan is what you really have to fear. I think that was a Star Trek movie or Star Trek episode, even though our Khan said that he is not related to the Star Trek Khan. You never know about these Khan guys. :)
It also been a while since I was last here and I'm glad to here of the site not just being a clone anymore so much and having its own material. I'm very tempted to be joining again. I wish you could get a reduced rate for joinging this and younglegalporn together, sounds like all the other sites apart from beataporn I will have as they haven't updated in ages. I joined originally for Lay the Kat and I found her site above average cause she was so very cute, she is worth the join for me if you haven't got anything by her before, without her tats she'd be in my top 5 girls.
I've seen a couple of previews of this site and younglegalporn and must say they are getting now some of my favs onboards, Summer Breeze and Tiffany have recently made appearances which is great news, hope to see more of them there. Hope they keep adding more cuties.
My only thing is that is putting me off joining again is the photos, as I'm just not into photos anymore and it looks like from the previews that a lot of cute girls are photo sets.
I read Denner's review of this site, he gave it a low score of 69, and I decided to stay away. Now I read your review and you give the site a very positive rating.
I'm seriously thinking of joining this site because of your review. If I do join, and find that I don't like the site after all, I'm coming after you for a refund.
[Icon/symbol/glyph of enraged man screaming and waving his sword wildly before he cuts off opponent's head]
That said - the site must have taken a much better turn lately - I was there in January (this year) - and certainly not happy with it - see my review. Is it still some kind of clone of YoungPorn.net?
Anyway - according to the preview - almost all the archived material is still the same - also at YP - which generally has some low tech quality material....
Nice review thanks. I remember being at some of the deisel sites a few years back but i don't remember getting 18 Only Girls. I joined mainly for the Kamilla18 site. Whilst she is super cute i found the site quite poor, sub standard photography and boring videos, and very little else to interest me in the network.
I was thinking about joining this network, mainly for the Young Legal Porn site. But then I joined the teen mega world network yesterday, because that was cheaper. My mistake, because I've been a member of teen mega world before, and am curious about the Young Legal Porn site. But maybe I will get to Young Legal Porn sometime in the future. :)
Teen mega world has some nice sites, but the grass is always greener on the other side. Just human nature, I guess.
But $40, or even $35, seems very steep for a 1 month membership. I don't like paying more than $30 for a month, and there are nice sites/networks that you can get for $20 or less (thru PU discounts).
I paid $20 for a 1 month membership to Teen Mega World, which gives me access to around 30+ sites. Of those sites, maybe 6 are the main ones for value, and the rest are filler.
On the other hand, the number of sites is really a marketing decision. All the Teen Mega World sites could be combined into a single site, but then the potential subscribers would think they were getting less for their money.
slutty, I took it as a compliment that you basically agreed with my review. I did not intend my reply as showing any disagreement. I just tend to ramble a lot, and sometimes people read into my words ideas I did not mean at all. You did not come off as compative (though I am not really sure what compative means).
There's a lot of the network I haven't seen myself. Or downloaded.
I assume you joined the network through the spunkybee site? Or did you find another site with a better offer?
There is a model named Klara at this site that is also called Aurita and Vera at the site. She started in porn maybe a year ago, and is appearing on a lot of different sites in both softcore and hardcore, at TeenMegaWorld network, Nubiles, and other sites. I think she even has 1 photoset at Met-art. I find her very attractive, and her videos at this site are among the best of the site. You might want to check her videos out at this site.
There are two other models named Klara at this site. I thought the video of the model named Klara with only one video at this site, listed as "Kaspar and Klara on video", that downloads as 252.wmv, is a good video.
I think that scoring a site is very subjective, and the score itself is only a very general opinion. Just like one critic might think a movie is excellent while another critic thinks the movie is just good or just OK, or possibly a waste of time, people will find different values in a porn site.
I gave the site a very high score because I liked the way the girls were treated with respect or affection instead of being treated as sluts or whores like many gonzo videos show.
But someone else could give the site a score of 80 or even 70 and I
wouldn't really disagree with their score, because that is their opinion.
I could have given the site a score of 80 myself, with no problem. I know that PU/TBP appears to believe a score represents something solid, but I do not. When I read a review, I am less interested in the score, which is a very general guide of the reviewer's opinion, than in the details of the review, what the person likes and dislikes about the site.
As far as acting as a possible guide to my joining the site, a lot depends on whether my tastes agree with the reviewer's. Many sites that get very high scores are not sites I would ever join, because I don't like the content of the sites.
I agree that navigation is not perfect. But I have a slow DSL connection, and what really helps me is having nice-sized thumbnails to show what the models look like. That makes it much easier for me to decide whether to view the video. At other sites in the network, there is no good-sized thumbnail, so I have to try streaming, which sucks for me with slow DSL, and some sites don't even have streaming. With no streaming, then I have to download the video, which can easily take two hours or more. So that's why I said the navigation is good, because for me, it's so much better than what some of the other sites have.
slutty, please see my comment posted today, titled "Special offer ends today". It explains a cheaper way to join the network, and to get access to 10 sites in the network, instead of just access to 1 or 3 sites in the network. That comment was added to the 18stream page at PU. I posted my reply to you as a comment, instead of a reply here, because PU limits the lines and length of a reply. :)
Some time ago, I subscribed to a site in the same network and found the same issue - probably in common with some other folk here, I have a separate webmail address (gmail in this case) for, er, extra-curricular activities.
I got round it by setting up a dummy address on one of my personal domains and forwarding it to my gmail account. Works fine, but obviously only if you have a domain you can play with.
Depending on your ISP, you may be able to play around with their email setup? Eg some ISPs may give you an address of anything@slutty.isp.com and give you the tools to forward varations of the anything@ etc.
It does look like a very high quality site,I don"t think i would pay any more than $35 topps though esp with download limits.Too bad 99bb wasn"t still around you could get very good quality uncensored movies at a reasonable price.There is just nothing out there for uncensored hd movies movies at a reasonable price right now.If you do decide to join up in the future i look forward to your review,The sample movies do seem pretty hot.
I was a little curious about this site also.I have been a member of carribean.com and tokyo-hot in the past and was looking for very high quality movies.The price along download limits make these sites not worthwile to join though.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
