Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ After seeing a couple of scenes of models playing games, I searched and found this site.
+ Large site with various fun strip and sex games.
+ The models look like amateurs to me.
+ Downloads are unlimited and are HD quality.
+ Very fun scenes which to me is unusual in porn.
+ The scenes are long and involved.
Cons:
- I don't know if the site is updating. The dates on the scenes show as updated, but I can't say for sure.
- Some of the games are boring and I just end up fast forwarding thru the game.
Bottom Line:
I saw a few scenes of porn models playing games, I believe from ALS Scan and maybe Girls Out West. I thought that is a great idea.
Joining this site reminded me there's a big difference between pro and amateur models. That difference is the pros have to act. The amateurs can just be themselves. It works well on Lost Bet Games.
The models generally act shocked and surprised when they have to take an article of clothing off and most important, by the time the game is over, you can tell the models are really turned on and ready for sex.
The games vary, most are just a variation of strip poker, but some become borderline boring. I think to produce this type of porn, you have to have a pretty high opinion of your ability to engage porn viewers. We are talking about people paying to see nudity and sex.
The models become game show contestants. Of the scenes I have watched, I knew within the first 3 minutes of each one if it was going to be a good scene. Some of the models do seem to be trying to act and those stand out in a negative way. The models that are being themselves are great. You see a lot of laughing and real smiles.
The scenes are typically long. It does look like there is some editing to maybe speed up the slower games. I'm thinking there needs to be a time limit on how long it takes to see nudity. At least there was for me.
The site could use some updating. You just get one page and scroll. I have downloaded 38 scenes and believe that is going to be enough for my collection.
Don't take the low number as a negative. That is around 40 hours of stripping games!
The scenes do make major changes. Some of the scenes look polished and professional. Those usually have models that look like pro models. The other scenes look more ad libbed. I much prefer the ad libbed ones. Even though, those are the ones that have some boring scenes. The professional ones just look like any group hardcore scene.
I am not for sure who would be in the recommended group for this site. The video quality is good. There are no pictures. If you like seeing naked people being genuine and having fun, that's who I recommend this site to.
There isn't much kinky or obscure sex acts in it, yes, those would make the content even better!
It's a great idea which means no one else will try it. I could see the sites that like using the family sex niche turning a game site into not so wholesome entertainment. It would at least add a fun narrative. I like the site a lot, but would only recommend it to those who like laughing while watching porn. I doubt I will join it again, unless I can see they are updating with new scenes.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I was going to proclaim this a diamond in the rough site, but it no longer updates
Amateur (mostly?) women teasing, masturbating and posing provocatively to cause guys (and women) to masturbate while watching them.
HD video downloads
Good performances by the ladies. It’s easy to find these types of scenes with a shy, young woman who is nothing but boring.
Nearly 200 scenes of a genuinely unique niche.
Thanks to the smaller size of the site, it is easy to find exactly what you’re looking for
Cons:
Back to the pro, the site has not updated in 6 months
The scenes are shorter than I think they should be and believe most men would agree
Bottom Line:
My interest in the JOI niche continues with Make You Jerk Off. Let’s get the obvious joke out of the way. A lot of these scenes are less than 10 minutes. That’s assuming guys watching the scene will finish in under 10 minutes. I do think that would make for an interesting sub-niche. Have the models post times of which of their viewers finished fastest. Eventually, that could become a video proving how fast the woman makes the guy get off.
The biggest problem with the site is it’s no longer updating. It is, however, one of the bigger collections of JOI scenes, even without new updates. My favorite part about this niche is the niche doesn’t change, but nearly every scene is different. Some of the women like to be more dominant and even demanding. A few are insulting. Some are even into making jokes. The shyer women giggle and act like they just thought about a guy masturbating for the first time.
There are the models who make for good porn, too. These models not only get into teasing the camera, but even start masturbating themselves and often, very explicitly.
Make Me Jerk Off is one of the better JOI sites. I could rehash the joke and say it’s why the scenes are short. There are several theories about why this has become my favorite niche of porn. I think the top reason is, the scenes are all at least a little different. It gives the scenes a more unscripted feeling. There are any videos on this particular site that make you think the female loses control and just gives in to her desires. That’s something I think porn needs to focus on more. Showing the actor/actress being so turned on that they have to join the viewer in masturbating. That is more interactive than VR is to me.
You also don’t have to worry about the story or plot of the scenes. There’s not one. It’s a nude or semi-nude woman teasing the viewer. She will either sink or swim based on her energy and efforts. I do believe this niche has a lot of untapped potential.
The videos are downloadable with no limits and just like every other JOI site I join, I have downloaded every scene. The model selection is a little better, in my opinion, on this site than most JOI sites. There are more amateur looking and acting models. It seems like to me the best female at this niche wouldn't be a porn star. There’s much more to this niche than just physical attraction and this site shows that well.
Some will also notice a major potential con – all you get with a membership is this site. Most JOI sites are included in networks.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ It’s a niche I’m surprised doesn’t have more coverage
+ Amateur models
+ I’m putting this in the pros, The Best Porn review lists a download limit, but that review was from 8 years ago. I haven’t crossed a download limit.
+ More fetishes than you think are being featured in these scenes.
+ You can download the picture sets and sometimes those show more than the videos
+ Pretty ladies wearing nice clothes
Cons:
- I tried Ultimate Surrender years ago, but was bored from the scripted feeling of the “matches”. It’s the same feeling with Femme Fight.
- The site needs to be updated, not the content or updates to the scenes, just the site feels old
- Video quality should be better across the board
Bottom Line:
I like the idea of women wrestling or fighting each other. Especially if I feel like the models are bicurious. Somewhere in my mind, that’s how all bicurious starts. Two women get mad, start fighting, pull each other’s clothes off and bicurious feelings appear. It’s really unlikely that’s how it happens, but it’s realistic enough for my imagination to run with it. I think the best known site of this niche is Ultimate Surrender and it’s good, but you have to keep your imagination involved or you realize you’re just watching a porn scene with a heavily scripted story.
Femme Fight may do a better job of staying in my imagination. The women are dressed normal or professional. Unlike in “wrestling” outfits. The scenes all follow a similar pace and script. I think this is a more modern take on mud wrestling without the mud. The women start fully dressed and grab hair, rip shirts, pull bras off, tear skirts and end up having sex.
The imagination part is most important and it is more protected by this style of “fighting”. It’s not promoted as a competition like Ultimate Surrender. It’s trying to be women in normal, everyday situations. I like it, but my imagination has its limits.
I don’t see it as a fault of my imagination or lack thereof. The video quality hearkens back to a decade or two ago. Those older videos should just be removed. I didn’t even know there was such thing as a 200p video. I don’t even use a big monitor, but those videos look like colored ants running across rice. If you can just stick with the newer scenes your imagination at least has a clear chance at surviving the poor to average scripts.
Unlike most of my memberships, I found that the picture sets were often better than the videos. At least for me. This is a genre that relies on suspension of belief or imagination. The pictures don’t move. I even thought of a comparison. If you have ever watched professional wrestling, you start seeing the mistakes or botches the wrestlers make. If you just looked at pictures of the same wrestling match, you likely wouldn’t see any of the pictures of the messed up parts.
It's the same feeling on Femme Fights. The pictures just give a better view for your imagination. I also believe the site should be updated in its programming, it would help make the site seem more up to date. It was better the first week than the fourth week. That’s going to hold my score back a little.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I always wanted to join one of these games sites and am glad I finally did
Over 600 unique scenes that seem more real than many porn plots
I think all the models including males are amateur
Videos can be downloaded and are HD quality
No need for stories or plots, the game being played in each scene takes center stage
It’s quite lighthearted and I like that about it
Cons:
Some of the games are just boring
The videos could be clearer, even the HD ones
Expensive site if you don’t have a promo
Bottom Line:
The basis of a site like this one comes off as a perfect setup for a porn scene. Much like the popular card game, Strip Poker, the games are created to work within a plan of getting the models naked. The winner gets to do what they want to the loser.
The name of the site explains the result of each scene. Lost Bets Games. The loser gets sex, rough sex, pushy sex and sex that just looks like it could be too physical and vulgar for some fans. It helps that the majority of the models are unknown amateurs.
It's probably better than I expected; the video quality is good and camerawork is very good considering you have multiple people in the scenes. I mostly had only heard of porn in this niche. I have seen a few scenes here or there that have strip poker or similar, but I hadn’t found a whole collection of these types of scenes before now.
The scenes all follow a game format. It could be any of 10-15 different games or competitions. Each one ends with the losers either playing the sub role in sex or masturbating for the winners. What is interesting about this niche is it’s totally different than any other porn niche I have seen. One of the things I noticed is the sex takes a backseat to the game. The game often takes longer than the sex.
It led me to a revelation. This is why this niche is not as popular as I thought it would be. The best scenes in this niche aren’t the best because of sex, but are the best because the game had some intrigue and question about who was going to win.
The sex could very well be the anticlimactic part of the scene. You may think the sex would be the most important part for you, but don’t think that. When a scene is 40 minutes and 34 of those minutes are the game and 6 are the sex, the sex cannot be the most important part.
Overall, the site is good, but it does look outdated and likely is outdated. There are no pictures or zip downloads. The navigation is basic and that’s the best way to describe the site itself. It does become repetitive after 5-6 scenes. I think this niche asks too much for porn writers and pornstars.
What I found is I didn’t even pay much attention to the looks of the models. I was becoming too involved in watching the game and often laughing about the results – not getting turned on. It does make it difficult to recommend, but I would think most people would know if they are interested in this type of niche and if so, at least give it a try. At worst, it’s a very different pornsite from what you’re used to.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Almost exclusively Filipina site
- Good job of showing the small size of the women
- The models are amateurs and range from really cute to very pretty
- Download speeds are good (80% my max)
- For the niche (Filipina), this is a large site, but there’s a problem (see cons)
- Good download quality on videos, but no downloads on photosets
Cons:
- Let’s start with the most obvious con. From the best I can tell, this site is recycling and has been for a while (Bottom line will explain)
- The very good pictures are brought down by no zip downloads
- It should include access to their Thai site, Tuk-Tuk Patrol, but does not
Bottom Line:
I admittedly have history with the owners of this site and Tuk-Tuk Patrol. They also own Asian Sex Diary. That’s why I’m going to explain the accusation of recycling. I’m not trying to be negative towards the owners of the site. I’m simply giving everyone reading this a head’s up.
I last reviewed Trike Patrol on 10-12-2019. I noted that there was “just under 500 models and just under 500 videos” directly from my review. As of 8-6-2023, there are nearly 200 less models and nearly 200 less videos than there was 4 years ago. Because I believe in being fair, I will say it’s possible some of their content was removed. I do remember their site representative talking about the legalities of porn in the Philippines and it’s why they used some censoring.
So yeah, it is possible, they are updating with new content, and just lost a lot of their content to removal, but either way, the site is just a shadow of its former self. It is showing new updates about once per week. There’s really no way for me to verify these are recycled or are not new, but even if they really are updating, the size of their site has decreased greatly and that was one of the strong points of the site.
It is true it’s hard to film porn in the Philippines and it’s hard to find attractive amateur models. Having the nearly 500 scenes and nearly 500 models made it a real treasure find for those into Filipina women. Losing nearly 200 models and 200 scenes has to be seen as a major deduction.
It also magnifies problems like having no zip downloads for photosets. I have to think if someone is a fan of this site, they would like to have the photosets in a zip download. These are very rare Filipina amateurs.
I was going to also review their site Tuk-Tuk Patrol, but don’t see a reason in writing two separate reviews. Tuk-Tuk is their Thai site and its numbers haven’t changed much in 4 years. That does help at least defend the side saying Trike is not recycling, except Tuk-Tuk doesn’t have dates on their content. Which is the opposite of Trike Patrol with its newest scene showing as August 4th, 2023.
I can and will still recommend the sites. You can join both sites for under $20 now for both of them combined. At that price, if you have never been a member, you are looking at a combined 500ish scenes of amateur Thai and Filipina models. The downloads are also high quality with 1080p downloads and you’re just not going to find content like this.
It's a hard place to be in as a reviewer. The possibility of recycling is a very big deal on a site like this one. If they included Tuk-Tuk Patrol with Trike for $10 a month, I wouldn’t have as much to complain about. As it is, it’s a questionable business tactic and while I still will recommend it, I also will recommend to be careful.
It's very good porn (the action) with cute and sexy Filipinas and Thai women. If you’re new to the sites all the content will be new to you, and you won’t know about the removed scenes. I do think it would make most Filipina fans happy.
One last and extremely important pro is they use Epoch through Paypal to sign-up and cancel. That at least should give you peace of mind.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. So you get access to all the New Sensations sites.
-Unlimited streaming. Downloads are limited to 300 GB, which is generous.
-You can stream videos in 720p and 1080p, with multiple bit rates for each definition.
-You can download videos in 720p and 1080p, with multiple bit rates for each definition.
-You get a nice, short text description of the plot of the video, plus tags for the video that can be used to search for your sex niches and fetishes.
Cons:
-Site stopped updating around 10-10-2018.
-Site gives me slow download speeds. I have a 200 Mbps connection, but my wireless connection can drop to 9 Mbps.
Theoretically, I've read that the minimum speeds required for:
SD (480p): 3+ Mbps.
HD (720–1080p): 5–13+ Mbps.
4K (UHD, 2160p): 16–25 Mbps.
So even 9 Mbps, which my wireless speed can drop to, should be fine for 720p videos.
But it doesn't work that way.
On my monitor, the stream is not smooth for 720p. And if I try to fast forward the video, the playback will stop completely.
The way to get around slow streaming speeds is to download the video, and play the file on your PC.
The technical features of some of the videos are top-quality. They have plot and some special effects and good to excellent video, nice sets, nice costumes, etc.
Bottom Line:
The videos at Parody Pass don't have a single focus or tone: they might try to be serious, or comical, or stupidly funny.
In contrast, the stories at Pure Taboo, a site in the Adult Time network, can be interesting and add to the impact of the sex. The Pure Taboo videos are trying to create an artistic, erotic visual experience where the sex is illicit. The Pure Taboo site is probably the finest story-driven porn site I've seen.
Candide, a novel by Votaire, published in 1759, was a satire on the Leibniz philosophy of optimism. The novel Candy, by Terry Southern and Mason Hoffenberg, written around 1958, was supposed to be a satire of Candide.
Candide, and Candy, are both considered comical, or humorous. I read them years ago, and enjoyed both of them. The humor is not really laugh-out-loud funny. More a quiet humor that, "Oh, I get the idea, and it's nice".
The Sex Files #2 is an imitation of The X-Files with sex.
My idea of parody movies include Airplane!, Blazing Saddles, Young Frankenstein, Hot Shots!. A movie where you get exaggerated ideas or acting that is supposed to be funny or enjoyable.
"The Sex Files #2" is not funny for me. It's not enjoyable. It's a waste of time.
On reflection, I realize that by "parody" what they mean is "imitation". The Sex Files #2 is an imitation of The X-Files. It was not meant to be funny, but interesting and enjoyable. Spiced with sex. But at 2 hours runtime, I was bored.
Reasons why I don't like the site:
I don't appreciate the humor of the videos.
I've never followed most of the TV shows that are parodied.
So the parodies don't strike a chord in my mind, that makes me laugh or appreciate the points being parodied.
Also, some of the parodies are just not funny.
The technical qualities of the videos are good to excellent. The acting by the models is OK for porn videos, which sets a low bar for acting. The sets are nice, the filming is done professionally: good focus, good lighting, good sound control, nice colors.
I'm giving the site a score of boring 78. That's a new category for boring sex and boring videos.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
The best thing about this niche is you always get at least 2 women for each guy
Very high quality and recent updates.
A total of 209 scenes with videos, photos and screenshots, all are downloadable.
I’m continually surprised by how attractive I find these European models.
Scenes are long, some as long as an hour.
Cons:
It’s not really a niche I’m that into myself. The whole swapping spit or cum or bodily fluids never really did much for me.
Even though updates have been coming in there’s no consistency to when the next one will be. Maybe they’ll prove me wrong with two in July 2021, and one so far in August 2021.
Bottom Line:
This is one of those niches I never really understood why it’s considered a niche. The sperm swap takes up maybe 30 seconds to 1 minute of the scene while the other 50+ minutes is at least a threesome. I feel like the cumshot is the most important part of a porn scene and know a lot of females feel the same way too. I guess we are predisposed to see that as our success when we have sex. So, to catch it in your mouth and spit it in your friend’s mouth, what’s the attraction?
You do still get over 200 scenes of at least threesomes with two attractive women and a man. The scenes are long and both women get a full working over by the man, no hole left untouched. There’s a kinkiness to these threesomes since nearly every scene has anal, vaginal and oral. You’ve got women pulling a dick out of another woman’s butt and sticking it in her mouth. The professional level of these models shows in their performances and in their stamina. I never took that into consideration when looking at scene length. These performers go at it for nearly an hour. They look like it too. By the end of the scenes they are sweaty, body parts are splayed open and messy. Maybe this is how you do hardcore?
I just stop watching once the cumshot has landed in one of the women’s mouths.
There are 209 scenes. The most recent 20 scenes have up to 4K. Before that, things get sketcky. But this is something I have felt with multiple sites from this group. The older scenes do take a hit in technical quality with the videos topping out at 540p, but the women are so pretty and sexy. I do not know most current models, so I definitely don’t know these models. Some of their best scenes on this site are from 2005-2006. Some of those even drop even lower in quality to 384p, which is pushing it, but it’s so hard to ignore the looks of these models. It’s more disappointing, at least for me, that the names do not help. One is Mercedes and Dianne. Those two are two of the sexiest models I’ve seen in porn, but there’s no way to know what other content they have (even on other sites) as their names are common and lacking a surname. That is going to make me lower the score when you combine that fact with the niche or I prefer “gimmick” not appealing to me. I do think it’s worth checking out to look at the models.
I will end with they do have newer scenes, three in the last 2 months, it’s hard to tell if they’re going to restart these sites. Not liking the niche makes this one less of an interest to me, but if I were them, if at all possible, I would remaster those old scenes. There are some scenes there that are really good. I did find watching those old scenes in a media player at 70% of monitor size to be okay, a little blurry, but I would rather watch blurry sexy models than clear unattractive models.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Bills using Epoch
Updates six days a week
Terrific ethnic, body type and age mix.
Comes with a decent cam site
Cons:
No PU discount. PU has $20. I joined it for $5 through another site.
The nudity is very softcore. Not explicit in any way
Not much erotic focus.
Some of the site cannot be downloaded.
No photos, but you can get some, see below.
Bottom Line:
Naked News is exactly what the name says. It is not sexy news, or erotic news or even stripping news. While delivering the news, they are often nude right from the opening and even when they strip, they are nude in only a few minutes or even seconds. They don’t tease.
The nudity is very softcore and never gets explicit. I am always left wanting the scenes to be a bit more of that special something. I can’t put my finger on the problem and I can’t get hot enough to get me to put my finger down there either.
The feeling I got was they don’t know what they want to be. They could be a news site or they could be a softcore site. They do a so so job as a news site and the heat level is not done well.
The women have a nice variety to them in age, body type and ethnic mix. But that is mostly in the guest anchors.
The main anchors are on the site too much and I quickly got tired of them. Stripping should have a mystery to it, but that would mean a lot more models on every day.
The models nearly all had tattoos and many have implants too. Some people don’t mind, but I found those to be distracting. I did not see a single one that was not shaved either.
There are no photos on the site, but there is an option to sign up for $10 for each model to chat with her and for special content, including photos. Sorry, no. Maybe an extra $10 for all the models, but not $10 EACH.
There is a decent cam site. I looked at it only once and the models were already nude, a plus. A minus is that many were using foreign languages without subtitles. I pass on the cam site.
I got the site for only $5 through another discount site. I think it might be worth that much, but not the $20 PU is giving us.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Appears to be a unique niche that not too many other sites cater for. In each update people competing against each other in some sort of game, with the loser (or losing team) suffering a forfeit. The games can sometimes be just simple card games, all the way up to more erotic stuff such as who can make their opponent cum first. The forfeits are equally as varied, ranging from embarrassing (running outside naked or getting spanked in front of people) to ones based more on sexual pleasure, be it masturbating, toys, girl on girl, boy on girl, group, etc...
- Very straightforward web site. By default, the updates are simply listed in order of most recent first, then heading all the way back. Therefore very easy to keep track of what you have or don't have if you're a downloader like me!
- All the scenes seem to use amateur, or certainly lesser known/indie porn stars, and everyone seems to be having a genuinely great time, be it during the games or the forfeits. Not much faking imo.
Cons:
- I was a member last month, so I can't 100% confirm this now, but I don't seem to remember there being a filtering system I could use to search for certain scenes, or at least not one I found useful. For example - as someone who preferred the more sexual forfeits over the ones set up to embarrass the participants, it would be great to be able to filter the scenes by type of forfeit. Instead, I had to click in to each scene and read the description, or in some cases watch some of the scene, before I knew if it would be one I would be interested in or not.
Bottom Line:
I really enjoyed this site. It reminded me a little of another site I stumbled across many years ago called DareRing, which seemed to be set up by some guy who managed to get several groups of strangers together, to play truth or dare style games, with the games progressing in risk/erotic level throughout. Unfortunately DareRing was never updated beyond the first 8 or so updates (I guess it's fairly difficult to get willing strangers to create that type of content!), so it was great to come across a website with a similar vibe, all be it not quite as amateur, but at least with plenty more updates to keep you busy!
I can definitely see myself joining this one again some time in the future to check out the latest updates.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Women using dildos on men in more of a dominant way or as a way to get him what he wants from her.
152 scenes make it look to be another site that’s recycling, the 2015 TBP review lists over 200 scenes. It’s still a rare niche.
Decent but inconsistent video quality, I guess these are maybe from DVDs?
Includes photo sets that are downloadable.
CCBill is the billing processor.
Cons:
The same problem I had on another site from this network. The newer videos are lower resolution than the older videos and there seems to be videos missing based on past TBP counts.
Have noticed at least 3 scenes here that’s on another of their pegging sites.
Keeps logging me out and requiring my to login with a username and password they generated which is a mixture of letters of numbers that I have no way of remembering.
Bottom Line:
This is my preferred sub-niche of the pegging niche. Not all, but the majority of the scenes are based around the man wanting to touch or have sex with the much more attractive female model. She turns it into a dominant situation where she will let him touch her, have a little sex with her – if, he lets her use a dildo on his ass.
These scenes as a whole look newer than the other pegging scenes on this network. The female models are more attractive, and some may even be porn stars. It is still hampered by the lower video quality with many of the scenes, but there are more 720p scenes on this site than any of the network’s other pegging sites.
These “couples” don’t look like couples. It looks more like a man and woman on a date, he’s overwhelmed by how much more attractive she is than him and is even more surprised when they go in his house or her house. She teases a little then whips out the dildo. Kink’s Divine Bitches is the mistress of this niche. But the scenes here are pretty good. They are not long which is something I’ve noticed with this network. You will rarely see a video over 15 minutes.
These scenes almost all feature the woman eventually getting fully nude and “allowing” the man to give her oral and to touch or suck her boobs. I think if you’re into this niche it’s a very good alternative to Divine Bitches and is one of the better sites I’ve found on the Ferro Network. There is the recycling part, but the scenes are new to me. The photo sets are a good bonus. You have short videos that even in 720p are rarely over 300MB and my collection of women sticking dildos in men continues to grow! I don’t think the cons here would stop a person from joining it. The niche itself does that. Those into this niche will look over the cons.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the women are very pretty and fun.
Many of the stories are interesting. If you like naked women and are looking for 'not hardcore' but a site that has some actually useful information, the site can be quite good.
Their fishbowl roundup is fun, depending on who is in it.
Cons:
Used to be an awesome site but it's gotten really old and stale. A lot of the women have been on there for WAAAAAAYY to long and rarely do they retain women who they audition.
There are some good anchors but if you like this site or not seems to orbit around if you like Laura Desiree. She's really tall, while still moderately attractive, getting long in the tooth, and dominates the show.
When she came onto the show she immediately became a producer and it's gone downhill ever since then---unless you are a fan. It's really become the Laura Desiree show and no longer the Naked News I used to love.
Bottom Line:
Some of the segments are great and some of the women are great. They are beautiful with great personalities and the site can be a lot of fun.
If you like Laura, you'll love the site. If you don't, she'll wear you out.
I'd check it out to see if you like it. Then, I'd move on and wait to see if the makeup of the staff changes. Otherwise it's pretty boring.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Can preview the entire site
-Updates six times per week
-Has links for discounts to porn sites
-Mostly gorgeous anchors
Cons:
-Biller is Paysafe, not a well known biller
-Prechecked cross sale
-Username and password are random computer generated letters and numbers.
-Inadequate search capacity
-Not all videos are downloadable
-Most anchors do not have any photos.
-Non erotic stripping
Bottom Line:
I find women newscasters to be very hot. Many times I have been distracted and think about them more than the news they cover. A dream come true would be how great it would be to see how they look under those clothes.
This site was started about twenty years ago and does just that.
The women here are mostly very attractive to drop dead gorgeous. Only a few don’t appeal to me very much, but that is just my taste. In more recent years some have the ugly trifecta of tattoos, metal hardware, or even worse, implants.
As a news site, it actually is pretty good. They cover the important news six days a week, as well as feature segments on a great many interesting popular topics, such as sports or entertainment. The coverage does not go into much depth and there is no real analysis. As much as this is reasonably well done, I did not join for the content. There are lots of sources for news that you don’t have to pay for.
As far as being a sexy fantasy site, this one comes up short in many ways. The old adage applies here that you should be careful what you wish for as you just may get it.
This site has most of the segments start and end with an already nude anchor. I appreciate nudity, but a teasing strip works better. The strip segments are the first ones each day and they call them “News off the Top.“
Unfortunately, on this site stripping is not much but mechanically taking clothes off and not done in a very sexy way. In fact often the model is nude under a dress and sometimes they strip from simple lingerie. Layers would work better, so they did not get the memo on that one. A little body movement would be hotter than a stiffly standing pose. Oh excuse me, I almost missed it, but sometimes they move their arms. There are almost no close ups and only rarely do you see her from the back as she walks away. What a shame. They rarely deliver a perfect fantasy wet dream.
There is also another problem that surprised me and I would not have predicted it.
The stripping is in the major news summary, so there is always a video playing on the left side of your screen and the model is on the right. I am completely distracted by this. I can’t get into the stripping, while on the other side of the screen a story is on about a natural disaster or worse yet, while our president is speaking. Occasionally the model goes off screen while the footage airs. I am sorry but I can’t get sexually excited while looking at Trump talking, or even Obama in older segments. No way, not ever, impossible, they must be joking. This requires a degree of focus I can’t imagine. They have been at this for twenty years and haven’t figured this out yet.
I think the solution is that stripping should be on the fluff segments that you don’t pay much attention to. The more I think about it, maybe they should just skip the serious news. If you are focusing on the news, this has failed as a sexy site.
The site also has some lesser faults. The videos start in HD in November 2013. Previous to that the videos are much lower in quality and many can’t be downloaded, not that you would really want to anyway.
The search capacity is weak. If you know the name of the anchor or the date of the broadcast, fine, it works for you. If you don’t know what you want, there should be tags. I guess they did not get the memo on this obvious move either.
At any one time, the number of newscasters is small. True they have guest anchors, but if you have seen a nude body standing and talking in 30 to 100 or even more consecutive updates, erotic fatigue sets in. The newscasters stay on the site for several months, even occasionally for years. Eila Adams has been on the news here since 2009 and Whitney St. John since 2006. After watching a few updates my focus drifted to the news content. This is especially true if she does not appeal to you.
There are 10 main anchors, 6 guest anchors and 59 former ones still listed in the model index. For the former anchors the link leads to a brief biography, but not to the videos. Few current or guest anchors have any photos at all. If they exist they are small and non nude glamour ones. The current and guest anchors listed are all white. In the past there used to be more diversity.
This site is different and maybe worth a one month join since the price is very modest. If you do try it out, don’t set your sights very high.
I give this a 75, but that high only because there are many models that are undeniably gorgeous.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Unique, interesting, sometimes funny, sometimes dumb, game sex scenes.
All amateurs and all exclusive.
Updates once per week, currently has 576 scenes on it.
Payment Processor is CCBill.
Wide variety of models by race and body type.
Covers solo, lesbian, male/female, group niches.
Doesn't feel staged.
Cons:
Scenes can drag on before you get to the action.
There will definitely be some models (male and female) that everyone isn't attracted to. I see it as a plus. It adds to the authenticity.
No photos of any kind.
Bottom Line:
I joined this site after seeing a clip from it on a tube site. It's very straightforward. All games played have the strip basis. They have multiple games they play using everyday household objects to regular toys. It's like a modern take on strip poker. They mix it up by making you wonder if the loser is really the loser (guy has to give a beautiful amateur woman oral sex), they have fun in the scenes and you can see that. A lot of the models are shy and you can see the nervousness of having to take their clothes off. It just gives a good feeling of they are enjoying it even if it's embarrassing. I'm sure you could see similar games being played in dorm rooms, at adult parties and that makes this content fun for me. I could see myself getting stuck playing one of these games with a group of friends.
The video quality for an amateur site is excellent. No 4K, but they have 1080p going back to January 2014, the scenes prior to those have 720p. It is disappointing that they have no photos.
There's really nothing to the navigation since the scenes all have the same basis. The titles usually tell what game is being played. There are rock/paper/scissors scenes, scenes with a light duty taser directly pressed against the other person's pussy or dick and even the board game Battleship.
What I really like about it is they don't adhere to a very demanding strict order from scene to scene. Some scenes, the loser has to masturbate in front of the other or others. Sometimes that leads to more, sometimes everyone masturbates, you don't get the feeling you've seen every scene after watching one. I think that might be the most important trait for a site like this. The game part can become slow and dragging at times. One scene, the device they were using seemed to stop working and they had to improvise. Knowing that you might see something different as the game progresses keeps me watching. I enjoy the ones where it's a believably innocent young woman and she looks so embarrassed to drop her bra. You will even see blushes. There's no pressure from a demanding producer. It comes off as that rare organic porn.
The masturbation, sex, group or solo or couple is good. I wonder how well some of these models know each other. They at times seem very comfortable with each other and at other times they look like they can't believe they got themselves "into this mess". There aren't many of these types of sites with 100% amateurs and that helps the score too. Many amateur sites have an amateur female and pro or seasoned male. Here you get all amateurs and part of the enjoyment is watching how quickly they (men and women) get aroused. I like this site a lot as my score shows, but I could see it being frustrating for others that are impatient. I like to try and "play along" with the pace of the scene and find this a very stimulating erotic experience if you do it that way.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The best, maybe the only amateur, Filipina site on the internet.
- Just under 500 models which to me is a huge amount considering the genre and mostly amateur. I say "mostly" just because a few of these models look familiar.
- Get on their email list and you'll receive many very good discount emails. I joined Trike Patrol and Tuk-Tuk Patrol for the same price one would have costed.
- Long videos, many are over 30 minutes. Excellent video quality, all videos have up to 1080p options on them.
- The videos are downloadable in 360, 480, 720 and 1080p.
- Very good download speeds (85% of my max).
- Bills through Vendo, I've used them numerous times without any problems.
- Nice mix of Filipina "models", good age variation, some are more average looking, some are very pretty, all are horny.
Cons:
- Quite a few ads. My feelings rarely change on this con. They have one of the ones that annoys me more than the others, the moving one that is showing sex.
- There's no way to know when the updates are coming.
- Can't download pictures without an automatic download software that grabs all jpg and jpeg files, which in these days is not worth doing since it grabs the ads, the names of the scenes, the logo.
Bottom Line:
I was rough on this company's Asian Sex Diary site and am throwing this in until I can later re-review the new ASD, they made some excellent changes to ASD's navigation and layout.
Trike Patrol is kind of like ASD but I think it has a more playful, fun side to it. The guys (Is that you, Jimmy?) go around on a trike trying to pick up Filipino women to be in porn scenes.
The scenes play out with some conversation, some tease, then the sex. It has a quality I complimented ASD on, this isn't cookie cutter. Some of the models come off as shy, but as I have learned from Filipino women, that all goes out the window the minute their clothes comes off.
There are just under 500 models and 500 videos, each scene includes a video and you can view the pictures. The streaming player works well if you prefer streaming over downloading and the overall feeling is this is how amateur sex should look.
The videos and action in them have an authentic feel to them. While none of the guys are overly-hung, you can tell the Filipino women are not used to the size and you can see that little inner nympho in them coming out when their hand goes around the dick. I like the feeling that you get from some of the models looking like they have never really experienced anything like this and it excites them.
I've said it before and will say it when I get around to reviewing Tuk-Tuk patrol, their other site but in Thailand, one of the biggest complaints is there's not more content. That's one my most positive complaints I can give a site.
There's not a lot of extras but there doesn't need to be for me. The navigation is easy to use. You can line the scenes up and just go through them. You can use the model list or choose from categories/tags.
Whether this is taken as a compliment or not, I don't really know, but this site reminds me a lot of the old Pacino's Adventures where my our friend Pacino would cruise South America looking for amateur Latina models. Same concept here. This is not the same as say Bang Bus.
I enjoy the full videos especially when they take the women shopping for sexy clothes. It's an excellent site for those that like authentic, amateur content. Score would have been just a little higher if there were picture downloads.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You get access to all the sites in the network. No premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Secure login, secure member pages. HTTPS. So your ISP does not have a record of all the pages you visit, to hand to your friendly government to track your porn usage (Except they do have a record of your visit to the site, itself).
-6,500+ exclusive videos.
-2,500+ porn stars.
-Multiple weekly updates.
-The video quality is professional. Good lighting, good focus, good camera-work, nice sets.
-Fast response from customer service for email help. I was blocked from one of their sites, and customer service helped unblock me within 25 minutes.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
Cons:
-Too many ads on most pages.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-European members are charged higher prices.
-Navigation could be simpler. It's hard to know how many sites you have access to.
(The sites are listed below in the first reply to this review.)
-Navigation: trying to enter some of the specific sites can be a problem.
-Most sites are not updating. Some sites stopped updating 7 years ago.
-The videos have a long runtime. The TRU: A XXX Parody (a parody of True Blood TV series)
has a runtime of 2 hours 15 minutes 25 seconds. I don't mind expanding the Wham-Bam-Thank-You-Ma'am experience, but 2 hours plus is a lot of time spent watching models who are not actresses.
-The file sizes of the parodies are huge. The TRU: A XXX Parody download file runs from 1.6 GB to 11.6 GB, for 720p and 1080p file definitions.
-Site stopped updating in 2018.
Bottom Line:
The main sites of the New Sensations network include: The Tabu Tales
The Lesbian Experience
HotwifeXXX
Tales From The Edge
The Romance Series
Shane Diesel's Bangin'
Plus there are about 19 other sites covering different niches
Parody Pass features parodies of some of the main shows on TV or movies: X-Files, True Blood, Star Trek, Anchorman, The Flintstones, etc.
A parody of True Blood
TRU: A XXX Parody The simple life is shaken when death comes to the small, quiet Louisiana town of Bon Temps -- where civilians, vampires, shape-shifters, and mind readers clash in an orgy of sex & mystery. When a dead body is found with the heart ripped out, local waitress, Sookie (Ashlynn Brooke), who has a talent for reading minds, her best friend, Tara (Misty Stone), and her Vampire boyfriend, Bill (James Deen), try to unravel the supernatural web and find the murderer. Sookie and her friends find themselves pushing all their limits, both mentally and sexually, in a climax you'll have to see to believe! The mix of sex, horror, and action is so hot, it must be TRU: A XXX Parody
Starring: Ashlynn Brooke, Gracie Glam, Lana Violet, Lindy Lane, Missy Stone, Shay Sights, Vanessa Naughty
Released: 10/10/2018
Average Rating: 4.0
Categories: Anal, Asian, Big Tits, Blonde, Brunette, Cum On Tits, Facial, Full Movie, Group Sex, Latina, Natural Tits, Parody, Teens, Tiny Tits
I have a slow internet connection, so it's easier for me to download the videos and watch them with a player program (usually Windows Media Player or VLC Media Player) rather than wait and watch the video buffering a lot.
Except the downloaded file size is so large (1.6 GB for the smallest version of the file) that, because of my slow download speed and limited amount of hard drive space, make downloading and watching files from this site a problem.
That's just me.
I signed up with AT&T recently for an internet account, supposed to get 75 Mbps connection, but I often get less than 1 Mbps speeds for downloading.
So I need to go back to Time Warner, which I wasn't happy with because I was paying for 100 Mbps connection speed but getting far slower speeds.
Far slower speeds, but everything is relative: Slow at Time Warner is zoomy-zoom compared to AT&T service, in my case.
I'm giving the site a score of 82.
Some of the problems with the site are because of my slow internet connection (which I can fix by moving back to Time Warner). But the files sizes are huge at this site (1.6 GB for the smallest file of one parody, going up to 11.6 GB for a 1080 definition version of the same parody.
So you need a fast internet connection, and plenty of hard drive space if you want to collect these videos.
Plus, the ads can be annoying. On the other hand, some of the ads offer a membership price that is often lower than you will find at most places: Pure Taboo for $9.95 for the first month (renewing at $29.95/month thereafter).
But I get access to Pure Taboo through my Adult Time membership: Adult Time membership is one of the great bargains in porn, giving you access to over 140 channels (Adult Time calls sites "channels").
I like the idea of a porn parody. But the runtime on these files is just too long: 2 hours plus.
Normally, you watch porn to get hot. But 2 hours is too long, and the video needs to be split up into sections that are 1 hour or less. 30 minutes sounds like a good idea. 30 minutes of high grade sex would be the perfect solution.
So cut "TRU: A XXX Parody" into 4 or 5 sections, that can be viewed in order, to make a complete whole. You would need to adjust for pacing and plot, so it would be a lot of work, but the site would be improved.
Giving the site a score of 82, because of network access.
If you don't like the site, there are plenty of other sites in the network that you might find more to your liking.
See the first reply for a listing of all the sites you get access to.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Membership includes access to all New Sensations network (26 sites). Across the whole network is over 1,000 models & videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Fun plots. I enjoyed the remakes of Big Bang Theory, Scooby Doo, and That 70s Show.
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 12 mb/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive (to the best of my knowledge)
Cons:
- The organization is frustrating. Once you enter one of the network sites you can only search in that site.
- scenes are all from 2009-2011.
- Lack of organization is a problem. With this much content, you really need more search capability than star/Date/"popularity"
- Some scenes offer trailers most do not
- Much of the content was shot for DVD and moved onto the web (looks like a right acquisition) - think this may be true for the entire site.
- I couldn't get my download manager to work.
- Ads behind paywall
Bottom Line:
Getting a little dated. If you're looking for current parodies I think Axl Braun might be a better fit.
While it is a fun site and I enjoyed it - if I was a big fan of the parody genre I'd have been disappointed. It was nice that this site was thrown into the network - but that's exactly how it feels just stuck in.
I recommend but only if you want the wider network or don't plan on sticking around. The lack of updates is the biggest deal breaker
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very Entertaining site
Newscasters of every age, shape and ethnicity
You can download and keep the newscasts
pricing is good.
Cons:
Can be a little monotonous sometimes.
A few of the newscasters are not great newscasters.
Slightly higher percentage of tattoos than I'm used to. (personal preference only)
Bottom Line:
OK, first off, the site is EXACTLY what it is named. Naked News. It is not a porn site, exactly... The newscasters don't have sex and don't do anything more than strip. But... I watch an hour of regular news every morning at 6AM and many of the same stories are on the day's production of Naked News at 7PM. But I have to say it is MUCH more entertaining to watch the 7PM show. This site has been producing news for nearly 2 decades (December, 1999!) so clearly they are doing something right!
Naked News is a softcore site with primary focus on the day's events in a newscasting environment. The only difference between this and a broadcast news show is that the newsgirls strip as the newscast progresses. There are different segments like headlines (called bulletins), sports, movies/hollywood and there is even a travel segment along with guest interviews with porn stars and nude models.
There are 6 HD shows a week and the shows last about 20-25 minutes. You can sign up to get an email when the show is released if you want and the show can be streamed or downloaded in one piece or just in the segments you want. The production quality is every bit as good as most national news shows.
I gave the site an 85 because, although it is one of only two sites in this genre that I know of (the other is a not-so-great Playboy branded production), this site does what it does very well. Just DO NOT expect anything other than what the name implies.
Honestly, a few of these women would make terrific regular news anchors, but they are probably having way more fun doing this. And some of the news interview and remote segments are so good you would not know they were not on broadcast TV.
Let me ask you this. Do you have a favorite news show? Is there a hot newscaster on that show? Well, if the answer is yes, it is because that show has tweaked the newscasting formula to keep you watching. Naked news does the same thing, only they aren't sly about it. They KNOW why you are watching.
There are a few ancillary features of the site also, like a cam site, snapchat subscriptions and even clothing optional vacation options like a naked cruise to Alaska! They have some interesting streaming options, too, like a subscription to watch the show on Roku.
Downside? Well, sometimes they have guest or audition newscasters that are a little rough in one way or another. And once in a while I skip a segment because I don't like the look of the newscaster (personal preference again). And there will be times, maybe, when the news is actually more interesting than the naked girl talking about it.
Bottom line: This is a different kind of site. It isn't porn but it IS entertainment. If you watch the news regularly like I do, but you don't like the boring way news is sometimes presented, than this might be a great site for you. Or...if you just hate watching regular news but feel it is important to stay informed. Ta Da! Naked News is PERFECT for you!
After watching it for over a month, I've found a good balance between actually watching the news and watching the generally hot newscasters strip down to their fully shaved nothings. I don't think you will never find a more entertaining news show! Try it for a month at the discounted price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A few attractive models.
2 models you've seen that are now pretty popular
Decent number of sets
Newer videos are full HD (1080)
Straightforward navigation
A few pretty good videos
(I'm really..um..stretching here to find Pros)
Cons:
No dates on sets
No indication of frequency of updates
Mediocre photography
Older sets have no video or really poor video
Several of the "Naked Gymnasts" aren't naked
Very basic navigation
Image downloads in one size (medium or small)
Many videos are SD
No model pages or search.
Site layout and design is ancient.
Bottom Line:
This was a clone site for Naked Gymnast, which apparently is gone, but this site is identical. My original review was for NG, but since that site is gone, all of the reviews are gone also. So...I'm writing an updated review here.
I saw a couple of very nice sample images from this site someplace and decided to sign up. The site is somehow affiliated with Club Seventeen and there was a cross-check that would have signed me up for it if I had not unchecked it.
I like the flexy-sexy type of images and the girls in this category are usually very fit. For this site, the analogy is more like that of a nude beach. What you think of and what you experience are usually two very different things. This is the reality version of nude beach. A few honeys and a lot of forgettable things. It isn't that the site is horrible, it's just nowhere near where it should be compared to other sites today. Even among sites in this niche, this site is sub-par and a little less than truthful in the way it presents material.
This site has about 500 sets that are not dated. There is a little log that announces updates about once a week. An update might be a set or a video. No idea if they are recycling. Most sets have between 50 and 100 images. One size, 1670x2500 or so max. Older sets are 1200x700 or so. Older sets also have NO ZIP FILES. Most models have 2 ore 3 sets, so there are probably about 100-130 models. Just 4 pages of sets with about 140 sets per page. The sets on the last page are really odd and many are not nude at all. There are no model pages so if you see a girl you like, too bad, you have to look through 500 sets to find her again. A few sets are linked though, but the logic of why some are linked and some are not escapes me. A few girls have different names in their different sets. Purchased stuff? Maybe.
Watermarks on the images say different things: Most say Flexyteens.com. Many say naked-gymnast, which was a clone site.
The models are typically young, but there is an odd lack of sexiness that one would normally associate with young, fit gymnasts. Most of the sets are practically clinical and many of the poses are neither gymnastic nor flexy and certainly not sexy, just strange. Curl up like a ball on a bar-stool strange. These are all eastern European girls with eastern European names. There is very little make-up...well...maybe it is gymnast make-up, I guess. And zero glam. Most girls start out dressed and in some sets the girl stays dressed. Oh, and for most models there is little to no eye contact with the camera. That is a significant factor in the clinical feel.
The two models that I see here (I went through the entire list of 500 sets in about an hour with a lot of "nope, nope, nope" on the first page), are Melena A. and Annett A. from Met-Art, both very popular. The sets of these two models here are different from the other sets on this site...better...almost like they are the marketing teasers. Purchased, maybe. Certainly shot in a better studio. And unlike pretty much every other model on this site, these models know how to look sexy...and how to look at the camera.
Here's another gauge. I just looked to see what I saved from the 500+ sets on this site. 6 photo sets and 6 videos from 4 girls I considered attractive (two were the ones I mentioned above, more recently at Met Art.). The rest were totally forgettable.
Bottom line? Pass. Maybe if it is a side-bar on club Seventeen for $10 or so, but for $30 this site is not worth visiting by itself. There are better sites in this niche for your money.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-1080p and 720p mp4 vids looks great
-hot models, mostly amateurs
-a lot of vids & pics
-real pics, not just vidcaps
-vks billing for easy canceling
-fast downloads, manager supported
Cons:
-bad webpage design
-slow updates, tho understandable since its a niche site
Bottom Line:
like the other reviewer said, the website design is bad. it is hard to keep track of what you have already downloaded, i had to keep checking my folders. this is really the only negative of this site
the videos are amazing. almost all the models are amateurs, i only recognized maybe 3 faces. it is clear they have some sort of background in gymnastics/ballet/dancing. this is not just some girls opening their legs. most of the girls take the videos serious, proudly displaying their flexibility. there are a few girls who are cute & embarrassed and smile a bunch, which highlights how these are real amateurs.
also one of the better videos from a model i now know as Inessa Sabchak is here, simply amazing.
there is a discount to their other site underwatershow in the members area, which i have also reviewed. i highly recommend it as well.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-tons of videos
-1080p videos are great quality
-720p are great quality too
-hot amateur models
-fast downloads
-uses vksbill (easy to cancel)
Cons:
-gets repetitive
-horrible web page design (none)
-no pictures
Bottom Line:
this site delivers exactly what it says it does. mostly hot models swimming in the water. that is its downfall as well, as it is the same thing over and over.
usually starts with the model slightly clothed (dress or bikini) and jumping into the water. she swims around clothed for a bit, then strips. this includes treading water, diving and some swimming. most of the girls look comfortable underwater holding their breath and eyes open, so no goggles used. occasionally there are multiple girls at once but i find this distracting.
at the end she gets out of the water and walks away. i wish wed see more of them in the nude after being in the water, but this is very rare.
this website is literally a long list of videos with a thumbnail. there's over 200 videos all on one long page...also no description or interview with the models.
if youre looking for something different with unknown amateur models this fits the bill
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE.
-I JOINED THROUGH A MEMBERSHIP IN NEW SENSATIONS, WHICH INCLUDES PARODY PASS AND 24 OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK.
-WITH 25 SITES, YOU GET COVERAGE OF A WIDE VARIETY OF NICHES.
-MANY OF THE MODELS ARE ATTRACTIVE. MAINLY THEY ARE SLENDER TO MEDIUM WHITE MODELS IN LATE TEENS/EARLY 20'S, BUT YOU ALSO GET A SMATTERING OF OTHER TYPES AS WELL: HEAVY SET GIRLS, LATINAS, MILFS.
-THE SITE STRUCTURE IS EASY TO NAVIGATE:
-NICE-SIZED THUMBNAILS OF THE MODELS, WITH LINKS TO THEIR VIDEOS: THIS APPLIES TO THE PARODY PASS SITE AND THE NETWORK AS WELL.
-ADDS ON EVERY PAGE. NORMALLY THIS IS A NEGATIVE, BUT SOME OF THE AD PRICES ARE VERY LOW, AND WORTH CONSIDERING.
-UNLIMITED STREAMING AND DOWNLOADING.
Cons:
-NON-SECURE LOGIN. PAGE REQUESTING LOGIN DETAILS (USERNAME AND PASSWORD) HAS A BROWSER POPUP THAT STATES THAT LOGIN DETAILS COULD BE HACKED (SINCE THE PAGE IN NOT HTTPS).
-THE FIRST JOIN PAGE (WHERE YOU SELECT A USERNAME AND PASSWORD) IS A NON-SECURE URL. SO, NOT ONLY DO YOU ENTER THE SITE WITH A NON-SECURE LOGIN AFTER YOU GET YOUR MEMBERSHIP, BUT IN APPLYING FOR YOUR MEMBERSHIP, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR LOGIN DETAILS ON A NON-SECURE PAGE.
-NO PU DISCOUNT. REGULAR PRICE IS $29.95/MONTH RECURRING.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE.
-EPOCH IS A SECONDARY BILLER. I RECOMMEND TRYING TO SIGN UP THROUGH EPOCH, A TRUSTED NAME.
Bottom Line:
THE NEW SENSATIONS OFFERS ADS WITH LOW PRICES FOR PORN MEMBERSHIPS.
NORMALLY, THIS IS A NEGATIVE, BECAUSE WHO NEEDS MORE ADS WHEN YOU BROWSE A PORN SITE?
BUT SOME OF THE ADS ARE VERY CHEAP:
VIXEN $9.95. REALITY KINGS $9.95. TEAM SKEET $9.87. EVIL ANGEL $7.95. CLUB SEVENTEEN $5.95. SEX ART $7.95.
THIS IS THE LOWEST OFFER I'VE EVER SEEN FOR SEX ART (PART OF THE METART NETWORK).
I DON'T SEE METART LISTED IN THE SPECIAL OFFERS NOW, BUT IN THE PAST, I SAW A METART MEMBERSHIP LISTED FOR ABOUT $7.95/MONTH, WHICH IS THE LOWEST PRICE I'VE EVER SEEN FOR THAT SITE.
THE SEX ART OFFER IS FOR $7.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH, REBILLING AT $19.99/MONTH.
NORMALLY, WHEN YOU SEE A SPECIAL OFFER FOR A LOW PRICE, AND YOU CLICK ON THE OFFER, INSTEAD OF BEING THE FIRST MONTH'S PRICE, IT TURNS OUT TO BE THE PRO-RATED PRICE OF A YEAR-LONG MEMBERSHIP:
FOR EXAMPLE, THEY ADVERTISE $8.95 MONTHLY MEMBERSHIP, BUT THEN YOU FIND IT'S ACTUALLY A $100/YEAR MEMBERSHIP.
AND FOR A SINGLE MONTH'S MEMBERSHIP, THE PRICE IS NORMALLY $29.95/MONTH, AND HIGHER STILL IF YOU SELECT THE ONE MONTH NON-RECURRING OPTION.
SO THE NEW SENSATIONS OFFERS ARE WORTH CONSIDERING.
THE STRUCTURE FOR THE SITE AND NETWORK MAKES IT EASY TO USE.
EACH PARODY HAS 4 DIFFERENT PRESENTATIONS:
ONE THUMBNAIL IS THE COMPLETE VERSION OF THE PARODY.
ONE THUMBNAIL IS THE BLOOPERS REEL.
ONE THUMBNAIL IS THE PARTY REEL, WHICH SEEMS TO BE A HARDCORE VERSION OF THE SEX SCENES.
ONE THUMBNAIL IS THE BEHIND THE SCENES REEL.
AND THE SITE OFFERS THESE CHOICES FOR EACH PORN PARODY.
YOU HAVE MULTIPLE CHOICES FOR STREAMING AND DOWNLOADING.
DOWNLOADING DOES NOT REQUIRE AN UPGRADED MEMBERSHIP, AS SOME SITES ARE STARTING TO DO.
TO STREAM A VIDEO, YOU CAN CHOOSE FROM DIFFERENT BIT RATES, 720p, 1080p.
TO DOWNLOAD A VIDEO, YOU CAN CHOOSE FROM DIFFERENT FORMATS (FLV, MP4, WINDOWS MEDIA), DIFFERENT BIT RATES, DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS (720p, 1080p).
VIDEOS STREAM SMOOTHLY.
I GOT GOOD DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ON DOWNLOADING.
NOTE: SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE MENTIONED DOWNLOADING SPEED PROBLEMS AT DIFFERENT SITES.
EXCEPT FOR A RECENT PROBLEM AT METART, WHICH LASTED A FEW DAYS, I NORMALLY GET OK TO GOOD STREAMING AND DOWNLOADING SPEEDS AT MY PORN PAYSITES.
THE RECENT METART SERVER PROBLEMS AFFECTED THE ENTIRE NETWORK, AND METART OFFERED A FREE EXTENSION TO ANY METART MEMBERSHIP TO COVER THE PROBLEM.
A QUOTE FROM THE METART NETWORK SITE:
I know some of you have experienced issues while browsing our sites over the last several days. As you might have guessed, we are having network issues that we are working to resolve as fast as humanly possible. We know this is causing some of you frustration while trying to surf the sites and see the content. We would like to credit your subscription for any day(s) that you have experienced issues during this period. Please email support@metart.com with the subject line Network Issue Credit and tell us how many days you have experienced network issues over the past week. We will immediately extend your membership by that many days, no questions asked. We appreciate your patience and loyalty. Thank you for being the best members an adult entertainment site could ask for.
WHICH SEEMS LIKE A VERY GENEROUS OFFER.
I'M TRYING TO FIGURE A WAY TO ASK FOR A LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP IN ONE OF THE SITES I DON'T BELONG TO, TO COMPENSATE ME FOR THE TROUBLES I HAD FOR LACK OF METART PORN.
ANY LAWYERS CARE TO COMMENT ON HOW I SHOULD WORK MY REQUEST?
(JOKE).
BACK TO THE REVIEW BOTTOM LINE:
THE PARODY PASS SITE FEATURES PORN PARODIES OF POPULAR MOVIES AND TV SHOWS.
THE PARODIES ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT: GOOD EDITING, SOUND CONTROL, ETC. THE ACTING IS GOOD (FOR A PORN VIDEO, CONSIDERING THAT THE PARODIES ARE MEANT TO BE COMEDIES, SO THE ACTING IS OVER-THE-TOP), GOOD SCRIPTS, LOTS OF SEX.
I COULDN'T ENJOY THESE VIDEOS PERSONALLY, I JUST WASN'T IN THE MOOD.
BUT FOR FANS OF THE MOVIES OR TV SHOWS (ANCHORMAN, 30 ROCK, SEX AND THE CITY, WHO'S THE BOSS, ETC.), THE PARODIES MIGHT HOLD SOME ENJOYMENT.
THE INCLUSION OF THE REST OF THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK, OF 25 SITES, MEANS YOU HAVE A WIDE CHOICE OF NICHES TO EXPLORE, AT LEAST SOME OF WHICH SHOULD APPEAL TO MOST PU MEMBERS.
I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 85. THAT'S BECAUSE THE SITE COMES WITH NETWORK ACCESS.
IF THE SITE WERE SCORED AS A STAND-ALONE, BECAUSE THE NICHE IS MORE SPECIALIZED, I WOULD RATE IT LOWER.
BUT IN SPITE OF MY PERSONAL LACK OF APPRECIATION OF THE VIDEOS, THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT, AND SHOULD APPEAL TO PORN PARODY FANS. THE SCRIPTS ARE WELL WRITTEN (FOR A PORN PARODY).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Automatic login to site (if you have cookies enabled). When you go to the site, you are automatically logged in, without having to re-enter your username and password.
-Works with Roku.
-Homepage acts like a table of contents:
--Gives list of anchors (both lead and guest), with nice-sized thumbnails and links to their bios.
(Trying to make a connection to the member so member will be more interested in the site)
--Amateur Auditions. Follow the search for our next anchor
(Same idea of making a connection to the member.)
--Recent listing of news features.
-Bonus content from Mr. Skin, a sister site of celebrity nudity.
-Cam show for site.
-Updates 6 days a week (so 6 new shows per week).
-Multiple download options.
--You can download the entire day's show, or specific segments of the show.
--You have choice of 480p, 720p, 1080p defintion for the download.
-When the news anchor finishes her segment, she turns and walks away. So you can watch her front and back jiggle.
Cons:
-If you want to post comments about the site, there is no internal page on the site.
Instead, you are supposed to post at the Site's facebook page.
Since I don't have a facebook account, this is a negative for me.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Billing processor is third-party company I never heard of.
-This is a softcore site that features female nudity. But no sex.
-I don't know how long the strip/nudity feature will hold your interest.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: news read by anchors who strip and go nude.
So it makes the news more watchable than a regular news program.
Except that a regular news program probably covers a wider range of subjects.
If you like their models, it makes the news much more interesting, to see them strip while reporting the news.
The stripping is not a strip-tease act, the anchors/models just take off their clothes while reading the news.
You have a number of regular female anchors.
You also have a number of guest anchors.
It's a nice idea, the first few times you watch.
Except they must be doing OK. Because this site has been around since 2000. And they update 6 times a week, so they are doing much better than I would have thought.
There is a blog.
The blog is useful, because it lists some of the main headlines for each newscast.
So if you want a preview or summary of each day's newscast, this is the the best source.
You can stream or download each news cast.
$15.00/month with PU discount.
The site is not expensive, but does not appeal to me personally.
The anchors/models are not selected to be the most physically attractive. Some are good-looking, but other anchors are just average-looking.
And some models have implants, or tattoos, which I dislike. That's a personal preference.
You can do search by news anchor, by segment, by date.
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
The site structure/navigation is good.
The videos are professionally shot.
The choices to stream or download are varied.
You get 6 updates per week.
Do I recommend this site?
It's not a bad site. But I would have thought it had limited appeal. However, as I wrote, it's been around since 2000, and still updates 6 days a week, and the site is well-managed software-wise. (I did not find any dead links).
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Looks like there are about 1500 videos
Videos date back to 2004
Good quality streaming videos
Many popular US porn stars here. Many!
Some of the videos are quite good
All videos are dated
Cons:
Videos are STREAMING ONLY
Videos are sold separately for $7.99-8.99 EACH.
Navigation is pretty basic
Navigation is frustratingly slow
Scenarios can be a little monotonous.
Some of the videos will make you laugh out loud.
Bottom Line:
Not sure what to say about this site....
I joined SexPOV and purchased this one as a $10 add on. Both sites are very similar. (I'll try to review SexPOV later.)
I joined because some of the videos looked amusing...and they are. Each video follows some kind of theme script and the range covers every scenario you can think of...everything from baby-sitter, to step-sister, to "jerk-off or my dad will fire you", to a hot alien female that needs your sperm to build a slave army. These are not your typical couple of lines from the girl scenes. They are long, long monologues that I'm surprised most of these girls could pull off (oh, wait, editing).
But I guess scripting like this is kind of typical for the porn stars that are here. Shyla Jennings, for example, has 6 sets. Lexi Bloom has 9 sets. Riley Reid has 14. What isn't typical is that there are no men. None...except a hand once in a while to help with lotion or something.
There are categories for the videos like Amazon, Asians, Babysitter, Boss, bratty girl, college girl, etc. There are some fetish videos too, like foot, bondage, a couple of lactation videos (as in breast pumps) and a bunch of humiliation videos...something for everybody, it seems.
Each video starts out pretty basic and usually innocent. Then the girl has a confession to make or something. She likes you. She found your porn stash. She saw you watching her. She noticed you have a hard-on. She thinks you have a really tiny dick. Whatever. She then usually takes her clothes off so you can jerk off to her. Sounds OK, right? But...
The majority of these scenes really aren't sexy enough to do much...for me anyway. They are cute, and a few of the girls are hot enough, but the simulated sex stuff can be weird and the girls aren't masturbating with you, they are just posing. Posing. Usually not on their backs or their stomachs or in any kind of open position. Just posing. And perhaps this is some kind of fitting joke on their part, but many of the girls only pose, or simulate, or whatever for about 30 seconds, then they are done because, I assume, they believe you are. Weird. Oh, and in a lot of scenes, for some odd reason, the girl will give a jerk-off hand gesture. Really? When, in any real-life situation ever, has a woman actually given you a jerk-off gesture besides in a Detroit strip club or a red light district in a foreign country? Never, that's when. (Yes, it's porn, not real life, but I've never seen a girl do this in a regular porn video without a dick in her hand, have you?) It just seems like an odd slur in a scenario where I'm supposed to be in the room...
The framing is just OK. There are some close-ups, but not nearly enough. Some scenes have no close ups at all. A few of the scenes are nearly clinical. I can't figure out if that is on purpose or if it is related to the talent level of the actress.
There are a few scenes that remind me of the old Twisty's or Danni's scenes where the girl teases the hell out you. These scenes are rarer than a nice tie at Burlington's but there are some if you look hard enough.
My acid test for any porno scene is simple. Turn off the sound. Watch the video. Did it get you off or seriously hard? Yes? It passes. No? It fails. Nearly all of these videos failed.
I mentioned before that I thought the site would be amusing. Well, after watching about 50 of these videos, it can be very amusing. Not necessarily exciting or stimulating, but amusing. Jana Jordan in a scene where she asks her step dad (me, right?) why she can't have a credit card is amusing. She's pretty good, but she is in her 30s, so the step dad scenario was a bit of a stretch.
The videography is generally pretty good. Lighting is good. But the sets look like they are all in somebody's apartment or maybe a house...nothing at all fancy. Many girls have multiple sets with different themes but in the same location and on the same day. Easy gig for them. One day model fee. No sex. Possible royalties from video sales. What's not to like?
OK, here's why I scored it a 72. It is a STREAMING ONLY site! WTF? Now it does stream in 3 speeds (medium high and mega..whatever that last thing is, it doesn't work on my computer), but you can't download anything. No vids, no pictures, nothing. If you want anything to keep, it will cost you...cost you $7 to $9 per video. Yeah. About that. No thanks. There are many other competitive sites that have as good as or better flirt scenes that I can download and keep.
Bottom Line? As far as "simulated sex" sites, this one seems pretty good, I guess. And there is a broad range of scenarios to choose from. But the complete lack of any downloading without paying extra per-download is the deal killer here. If you are into this type of site and you don't mind that you can't keep the videos, give it a shot. Unfortunately, I can't recommend it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Membership in Massage Creep gives you access to 22 sites in the Porn Pros network.
-The sites cover a variety of niches: massage, squirting, blowjob, etc.
-A large number of mainly attractive, white models in their late teens, early twenties.
-Professionally shot videos: clear images, good sound control, good lighting.
-PU discount of $17.95/month.
-OK download speeds. I averaged about 3-4 MB/sec. My max download speed limit is 6.25 MB/sec, which I rarely get. At most sites, I average about 4-5 MB/sec.
-Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free, easy to use manager.
Cons:
-There is a pre-checked cross sale on join page.
NOTE: Even if you uncheck the cross sale, you might still be charged for the cross sale.
So make sure you join through Epoch, which will send you an email if you are signed up for the cross sale.
And Epoch will be able to cancel (and refund) the trial cross sale.
-There is a $69.95 fee to upgrade to all the sites in the network.
I hit the "No thanks" link to enter the regular site, but fear these idiots will charge me the $69.95 fee anyway, because they do not appear to recognize the word "No".
-Requires captcha to log in to site.
-First page at site is an upsale for $70 to access all the sites in the network. You have to view and accept or reject the upsale page to enter the member's area you paid for.
--Sometimes videos stop streaming with the message: Network error.
-Sometimes photos fail to load: Message states:
Forbidden
We're sorry, the server understood the request, but is refusing to fulfill it.
Massage Creep theme: girl gets message, is so turned on by the masseur that they have sex.
Massage is a popular theme in porn. And the Massage Creep site does this well. Although there is not much variety in the plot, the girls are young, attractive, and the sex can be hot. So Massage Creep is one of the better massage-themed porn sites.
Site has 202 videos. Plus a matching photoset for each video. The photos are screencaps.
You can choose to stream or download the videos.
The streaming is offered in standard and HD definition.
Most videos offer a choice of definition for download: 480p, 720p, 1080p.
There is a zip file for each photoset. Only one definition for the zip file, not offered in high, medium and low.
The quality of the screencaps is good, but not great. Much better than the screencaps that porn sites offered years ago, but: because many of the models are attractive, and the screencaps are almost-collectible in quality, you wish that the screencaps were even better, because then the photosets would really be worth collecting.
You can view thumbnails of the photoset screencaps, or enlarge any individual photo, but if you want to view the entire photoset, the best idea is to download the zip and use a software program to slide show the photos.
Otherwise, the software mechanism for viewing the photos online is clunky, and takes too many mouse clicks to move from one photo to the next.
I am not technically proficient, so I don't understand how the screen caps are made from the video.
But the Teen Mega World screen caps have better clarity than the Porn Pros screen caps.
And I prefer the Teen Mega World mechanism for displaying the photos online over the Porn Pros system.
Both Porn Pros and Teen Mega World are basically hardcore teen sites that focus on video over photos.
But the Teen Mega World has made a large improvement over their past system of displaying the photos, and the quality of the Teen Mega World screen caps has also improved, to the point where many of the Teen Mega World photosets are worth collecting. Because the models are attractive young teens, and the images are centered and clear.
The Teen Mega Word screencaps are not up to the standard of MetArt or MPL Studios, obviously, but in erotic content, they can sometimes surpass MetArt and MPL Studios. Partially because you are comparing Teen Mega World (hardcore teen) to what used to be softcore teen (MetArt and MPL Studios--that are now making an effort to increase the hardness of their content to attract today's porn audience).
I've said it before, but I think it's worth repeating:
My system for joining a site:
-content that I can enjoy.
-is easy to use.
-gives value for the money I pay.
-lack of annoying features.
Massage Creep has content that I can enjoy. You get access to over 3,000 videos (at the Porn Pros network).
Many of the models are young teens, early twenties.
Mainly white. Attractive to very attractive.
The girls seem to be mainly enjoying the sex.
The site/network is OK to navigate.
I wish they would remove the captcha for login.
I wish they would remove many of the advertisements for "Upgraded" status costing $70.
I wish they would remove many of the advertisements for other paysites.
And I wish they would make the screencaps better quality, and the onscreen viewing of the screencaps easier.
For $17.95/month, it's definitely worth a visit, to see what the site has to offer.
But the site could be improved.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Updated:
07-18-1605:13pm (Update History) Reason: I had a major gripe when I first joined. Video downloads were only in 480P. However, 2 days later they started offering high quality downloads.
Pros:
* Epoch is the biller
* Young, mostly cute Filipina models
* Minimum amount of tattoos
* Site owners / managers are very responsive to emails and concerns, a big plus.
* You're dealing with a small personalized site instead of a behemoth bureaucratic site.
* Downloads in 480p, 720p and 1080p
* With a $10 discount offer, I paid $19.95 recurring monthly. No problem cancelling
Cons:
* Videos not dated
* Not much variety, though thats hard to avoid unless there are multiple directors.
Bottom Line:
I reviewed the site 2+ years ago. It was one of the first sites I reviewed and I was also inexperienced with porn sites. Now that Im a little more savvy thanks to PU, I can shed a little more insight.
The premise - its about 2 or 3 Swedish (?) guys who travel the Philippines and film their sexual conquests. For the most part, they ride around in a Trike, which is something like a motorized tricycle, kinda like a motorcycle with 3 wheels and a backseat. They ride around looking for women to take back to their hotel. The women are amateurs - mostly young and pretty, though theyre bar girls or prostitutes. For the most part, most scenes seem realistic and unscripted. If this is not so, I would be surprised. Many of the women are very shy.
This is a refreshing change from most sites. Real women trying to get by. The Filipino culture is one to be admired. I visited the country twice and its people, especially the women, are its greatest asset.
The entire premise is fairly unique and one that I find very appealing. Scenes are mostly one on one hardcore, though there are some threesomes and a few anal scenes.
Last week I received an email from them announcing that downloads were back. As a result, I'm back after they went through a period of streaming only.
I would rejoin this site but it'll be a while. It doesn't seem that they update more than once every two weeks, though it's hard to tell since videos aren't dated.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
