Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ A big part of Adult Prime being an exceptional join
+ Softcore, artsy, pretty models
+ Updates 4 or 5 times per month
+ Includes the Adult Prime network
+ Great user features and usability
+ Movies and picture sets are downloadable with no limits
Cons:
- Networks usually leave me frustrated and that’s possible with this one
- I would like to see one (or any) network, try some different niches for their sites
Bottom Line:
Back when Adult Time first launched, one of their big selling points, was the inclusion of the 21 Sextury network. It was an established site with a large following of fans. Adult Prime is doing similar with Digital Desire. This immediately calls on my frustration with networks. Digital Desire could still a standalone site and sell memberships just for it. That’s a good thing since you receive access to it with the Adult Prime network, but it does offer something of a safety net for the network. As long as Digital Desire continues making their style of content there’s not a lot you can find wrong with the entire network. You’re still getting a premium site in Digital Desire.
Digital Desire is a throwback softcore, glamour-type site The models look like mainstream models. They look like they could be high-dollar escorts to successful men. The navigation for the site is very good. It’s easy to find what you’re looking for on – Digital Desire. The site loads fast and that’s important with a network. Most of the sites on networks were originally standalone sites and only had to load the content of their site, not an entire network. There are downloads, including 4K videos, photo sets and those are unlimited.
I do believe Adult Prime is a far-reaching network. What I mean is, the sites rarely are similar to other sites on the network. That adds a lot of value especially for anyone who is newer to the site – or even newer to pay porn. You will get to experience a lot of different niches and styles of porn.
Digital Desire focuses on pretty models in beautiful settings. The models are 18-24 (majority) and while the content is softcore, it shows more and implies more than softcore sites used to offer.
Venturing away from Digital Desire and into the network, is as simple as a click. There is a big change coming, though. The network features bisexual (men), group, old and young, virtually every niche in mainstream porn.
You will definitely get your money’s worth with this network, but it will be up to the person whether Digital Desire, by itself, is worth joining the network for. It’s not for me, but that’s just because I’m not really into the softcore content. This is a network that can reach fans of all different niches and will make you a fan of some niches, you didn’t like before.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Hardcore mix, looks very dated, probably 90s.
Straightforward navigation and clean site design, also mobile device-friendly (but see cons).
Search works across scene titles, model names and categories/tags.
Scene index thumbnails have a badge to indicate whether the scene is a favourite.
Model index with links to scenes and is sortable by name, update date or popularity.
Can save scenes as favourites and leave comments.
Favourite scenes listed in order that they were favourited.
Downloaded scene videos are very reasonable file size.
No restrictions on downloads and supports download managers.
Responsive support via email.
Vendo billing.
PU discount.
Cons:
Some features such as comments, liking a scene and flagging an issue with a scene don't work.
Inconsistent/poor download performance for many scenes, varies from less than 2Mbps up to 8Mbps.
No model bio, just list of scenes.
Some scenes have streaming thumbnails for an entirely different scene.
Too many scenes lack any scene length info.
Tags/categories link to videos from all networks rather than just the current one.
Downloads button doesn't do file download, you need to right-click and choose "Save link as" or whatever your browser provides.
Maximum video size is 1080p full HD - no 4K.
Older content is 720p rather than 1080p.
Comments and favourites functionalty is scene detail page is is very unresponsive and slow.
Odd behaviour of favourites badge on mobile devices.
Bottom Line:
The name of the site brings to mind the famous movie director Werner Herzog, but this site has nothing to do with him or his work.
It features plenty of 90s hardcore German porn action covering lesbian, domination, threesomes and group sex. At least one scene features anal. The content is mostly from the 90s so it looks very dated, though still hot.
The site functionality is straighforward and effective, with paged scene listings and scene detail pages from where you can stream the scene, download it, like it, add it to your favourites, add comments, flag/raise issues with the scene for support purposes.
You can filter the scene listings by category (anal, DP, etc) but only by one category, which isn't necessarily a big deal.
A nice touch is that scene thumbnails indicate whether the scene is in your favourites list.
Very usefully, the scenes in the favourites page are in the order the scene was favourited and so easy to keep track of - I've come across a number of large sites where there are unofficial limits on numbers of favourites and so favourited scenes end up quietly dropping off the cliff.
As someone who generally watches porn on a mobile, favourites scenes and then downloads them when on my PC or laptop, I appreciated the otherwise good mobile functionality.
There are a number of negative aspects of the site:
- clicking on the download link just loads the scene in a new browser window, forcing you to use the "Save link as" option provided by your browser to actually download the scene.
- submitting comments is very unresponsive - from hitting the comment it takes up to 30 seconds for your comment to appear and sometimes it doesn't.
- clicking the "Add to Favourites" button results in nothing happening until after between several seconds and thirty seconds.
- the links to actors is by actor name rather than a unique id, so a scene starring say Angelina, will link to a list of scenes starring an actor named Angelina and not necessarily the same actor from the scene you clicked from.
- on phone or tablet, the "favourite" badge on a scene thumbnail doesn't appear with the device in portrait mode, only if landscape mode.
I watched a lot of the content from this site but didn't download anything from it, so I guess that sums up my liking for it. If vintage 90s porn is your thing, you'll like this site, other than that it does include other sites from the Gasm network, so it's worth joining for loads of other qulaity content.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Some absolutely gorgeous women, just Supermodel types from the 90s era
- Films had a real nice nostalgic softness dreamy feel to them- Great exotic style settings and backdrops
- Some good films if you've never been a member of woodmans films
Cons:
- Not the best quality here with resolution as movies made a long time ago
- I feel the women often underused in lots of these movies, often felt my expectations were not quite met
- Photos sadly not great in my opinion
- Porn scenes with plots on lots of movies
Bottom Line:
I have to say this site to me was one of them that looked good on the outside and I really should of looked more into the actual content as that was a serious letdown, having recently been on Woodmans network which included his woodmans films site and downloaded all I liked here and being really blown away by the beauties that appeared, let's just say OMG some of these women were knockouts, absolute stunners that I wish so much you saw the like in today's adult films. So soon after joining I was excited to see more of the same women with more content on this site. Sadly all the good stuff I'd already got, there was the odd movie I got of some decent stuff but lots I found lacked the good sex scenes and were more trying to be a normal movie with a plot-line than outright porn movies which I've never been a huge fan of mainly apart from classics like Emmanuelle.
One of the other main reasons I wanted to join was to see the images too as I remember the 90s style of porn magazines and the look of women in porn in the 90s and late 80s where classy not your fake eyelashes and over done makeup porn you see with stars of today's porn world forcing the glam look there was no need in the first place, these porn photographers and directors back then seemed to hire some super stunning natural women that just had class you don't tend to see so much now, weather it was the film they used back then or the photo filters but I for one love that type of porn, it takes me back to when I first discovered porn so has nostalgic value I guess. One major downside though was the quality of the image for content from the 90s and 80s is it isn't going to be high resolution and I knew that when joining but the images here just didn't really excite me much and were not as good as I'd hoped they might be. For one it was quite hard to find anything decent. You have to go through lots to find anything worthwhile as navigation on this site and search ability is next to none.
The sites is good to look at don't get me wrong if you've not been on the woodmans films site and got them then here is a great place to find those movies, don't expect any high resolutions as these movies were made mainly in the 90s and early 2000s maybe but there is some amazing models to be found that worked for Private in those days, women that you will not believed did porn Silvia Saint, Nikky Anderson, Blondie to name a few, lots of the movies here at least the best stuff in my eyes were directed by Pierre Woodman so lots of the movies feature anal and watching absolute stunning women doing anal on film is always for me a winner, lots of really exotic settings and some of the most beautiful porn ever shot I would think, wish there was porn being shot like this today with the same style of movie filters or whatever they used for that great 90s porn you see but with huge high resolutions, I for one would love porn to look like this quality but done now, sadly most directors at least that I've found film anywhere near as good stuff as found back then, I guess those type of models they used in these movies just don't choose porn as a career or if they did it's doing the self produced stuff on onlyfans or you'd see them on sites like Playboy or Femjoy.
Overall its a good site to discover how gorgeous some of the models were back in the 90s, and you'll discover some good stuff if you've never joined woodmans films before, if you have an have these movies you'll discover much less classics in my opinion.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
An interesting site that works as a finder for unique porn scenes.
There are educational and instructional videos too.
Most scenes have subtitles or captions.
Epoch is the biller.
Some of the scenes remind me of early 2000s Vivid scenes which are my favorites.
Cons:
A lot of shorter scenes under 10 minutes.
No dates on the scenes. I don’t know if it’s updating.
No downloads
Bottom Line:
This site is run by the same company as Crash Pad Series that I reviewed. This is a video site that’s not unlike Videobox or sites like that. What is different though, this is more like they found the unique scenes and that’s what they have. It’s not going to be for everyone. I thought some of the scenes were cast poorly. I don’t think this site does the casting. I believe these videos are by other studios. I could be wrong. The scenes are different to say the least. There is one with an overweight transsexual with an overweight gay man. It’s like softcore. I’m sure my mind has been corrupted by all the porn I’ve watched, but I just don’t see that pairing fitting in a softcore scene. There is the uniqueness of that. If a person is into an overweight transsexual and overweight gay man in softcore, here it is. I think that would be really hard to find.
I didn’t see a reason to put this in the cons. I don’t think they film there themselves. A lot of the scenes I liked had strange camerawork. I’m not known for loving hardcore porn, but the cumshot is my favorite part. The camera scans away or to the left. It’s almost like it’s trying to be too artistic. The cumshot is the one part I would want to fully see.
They do have some really good lesbian scenes and masturbation scenes. I like that they don’t stick with the traditional models. You will see a big variety of sizes, looks, tattoos, piercings and I do prefer that.
They also have men masturbating which is my favorite porn niche. It’s too bad I can’t download those to put in my collection. They list those as Gentlemen Handling. You also get a variety in those with some being transsexuals. I have joined sites just for Gentlemen Handling.
I believe what they do is go out and get independent porn producers’ scenes. That’s going to always be hit or miss. And what could be hit for me may be miss for someone else and vice-versa. There are some group scenes, even have some pegging which I sometimes like, but other times not so much. It’s not mostly amateurs like their other site. I recognize a lot of these performers. I know I saw Kali Sudhra and Amirah Adara. Most of the scenes I watched have the same positive the Crash Pad site had. The action is very believable and sincere. That’s going to enter into your preferences. I don’t know how much some people want to see sincere kissing in porn. I like it, but I’m a woman.
Those instructional and educational videos are very interesting to me. They even have a how to squirt video. I always wondered why more sites didn’t try videos like that. I don’t know about you all, but everything I learned about sex was from porn! Why not give us some instructional videos and manuals?
That no downloads part is going to be a sticking point for me. There are a lot of these scenes that I would like to have. That’s a compliment that I would like to download them, but it doesn’t change that. I haven’t been on that many sites over the years. I never really understood the thinking behind no downloads. It’s one of the first sites I’ve been on that has that rule. It just seems like the style of porn they have goes against conventional thinking so why shouldn’t the business practice? I won’t take a lot off for the no downloads, but will take 5 points off for that. It’s a good, unique video site that only needs to fix that no downloads part. Everything else is workable with the site.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+Over 1700 videos 3700+ photosets of beautiful softcore glamour models.
+Works well on mobile devices.
+Straightforward navigation of scenes via paged thumbnail gallery sorted by latest or oldest release date.
+Good search facility on model name and scene name.
+Filtering of scenes by category/niche and year of release.
+Scene page provides complete info with links to models other scenes and linked categories/niches, as well as the usual streaming and download functionality.
+Can like/dislike a scene as well as leave comments and favourite the scene.
+Variety of streaming and download formats including 4K for newer scenes.
+Can create your own video clips from scenes.
+Good download speeds with 8MB/s on a 70Mbps broadband service, works with a DL manager.
+Downloadable zipped photosets.
+Includes Adultprime network.
Cons:
-Model index lacks model details other than name.
-Favourites pages have randomly missing scenes - each page lists 24 scenes but sometimes less are shown on certain favourites pages.
-Filtering scenes by niche is hit and miss, for example, the niches "blonde" and "brunette" return no scenes but "blondes" and "brunettes" do. It would be better if the list of niches was limited to those actually included in the site content.
-Some (even recently released) content isn't HD.
-Pointless "create your own clip" feature.
-Annoying slide-out ads for cam girls.
-Download filenames aren't unique so you'll have to makeup a suitable filename before downloading a scene, otherwise there's a chance you might accidentally overwrite a previously downloaded scene.
-Unresponsive customer service from IMCBill, cancellation request emails not acknowledged/replied to (see bottom line)
-Pre-checked cross-sale on sign-up.
Bottom Line:
The content is nude glamour photography and videos from the legendary J. Stephen Hicks so the quality is very high.
Scenes range from less than 10 mins up to 20 mins or so and feature glamourous US girls with a variety of body types in solo softcore, some using toys.
Scenes can be downloaded as 480p, 720p and 1080p.
Photosets are viewable as a gallery and image sizes are 3000x2000 downloadable as ZIP files.
This site works well on mobile devices so I tend to browse the scenes on my smartphone, favouriting those I like and then downloading them from my favourites list the next time I'm using my PC.
The customer service from IMC Bill doesn't inspire confidence, as I ended up paying twice for my membership: once after the first sign-up failed with a message saying that customer services would contact me to sort it out but didn't contact me and subsequently just authorised the failed sign-up and charged me, and again after I'd signed-up using PayPal having lost patience but a few days before I received the email saying that the previously failed transaction had been authorised. Messages to customer service were ignored, even my auto-renew cancellation requests. However, I did receive an email the day before auto-renew to confirm that my membership would not be renewed, so it did work out.
If you like softcore, the amount and quality of the content easily justifies the membership, but with the included Adult Prime network content it's a bargain. Just double-check the biller details and if it's IMC Bill, be sure to sign up with a credit card that you can cancel after sign-up, just in case your renewal cancellation messages are ignored, or just use PayPal.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Oh no, another of these sites to make me wonder if I just enjoy watching cute, young women have sex or if there’s more to it!
61 scenes of fully remastered porn that looks like it was made in the early to mid-2000s. It is updating weekly.
I don’t need navigation with these sites. I download nearly every scene. I feel like such a perverted woman.
It feels more real and believable than a lot of porn that’s out today. There’s a cheerful bliss in the young ladies’ faces.
The video quality is very good for the time period it’s from. It’s downloadable and unlimited (trust me, I would know by now if it’s not).
The scenery, a lot of these, especially the newer ones are outdoors in the snow.
Cons:
It’s relatively small and I am guessing these scenes are available in non-remastered form.
The models are so cute it is almost a con. I find myself saying, “Don’t stick that in there”. I have laughed all the way through this.
Bottom Line:
My real first introduction to porn was a DVD by Vivid. That is what this reminds me of without the stories. There is playfulness, an enjoyment, lots of smiles and the women are so cute and pretty. The scenery adds to it. I had not ever seen snow until I moved to the United States. It adds the pure white background, and it adds me wondering how cold they must be. I first thought what this was a new site that was filming in vintage style. It does look like these are old scenes, probably fan favorites, that have been remastered. The videos look very good. There are no pictures that I have found. Last month, I reviewed Club Sweethearts and was surprised by how much I liked it.
This site just continues that feeling, maybe a little more, with just the quantity holding it back from a higher score. I could easily see downloading all the scenes from this site. I don’t usually say something like this, but some of these models today look bad.
The one I noticed most is Jane B in the scene Latina Teen Fucking. The names of the models make me think it’s older. I have heard several of the Porn Users talk about the 2000s having the models with the generic names. I don’t think know any Latina named Jane. She is an incredible performer. These are not glamorous models. It’s minimal makeup and normal clothing for that era.
I feel like the person must feel that just discovered porn. There’s not anything that special about these scenes. I don’t know what they’re saying. There doesn’t seem to be any kind of story. There is no theme. I’m being impressed by their energy, how pretty they are and how sexy they are for what looks like at most 20 years old. I do believe the minimal makeup, the clothing of the era, adds a lot to the scenes. It makes curious to know if any of these young models went on to be big star models, but I just don’t know it. They are outperforming models with 15 years of experience. I don’t know if I’m just speechless or what. There are 61 scenes with a new update every week. It is part of the Adult Prime network. The remastered scenes can be downloaded or streamed in 540p, 720p or 1080p. They have done a very good on the remastering. I’m now even wondering how much things like room color and settings are improving the scenes for me. So many newer sites have the white room with a white bed and perfect white lighting. The one I talked about earlier, her and the guy look like they are in a beach apartment. It has yellow floors and yellow walls with some blue and orange mixed in. Me being in the mental science field, those colors could be changing the mood for me. I can’t give it as a high of a score as it deserves. I believe I would download and keep all 61 videos, but I don’t know if that is enough to score it any higher than I did. I do believe adding pictures would help. I feel dumb for saying that. If they don’t have pictures, they can’t turn back the clock on the models to look like they do in the scenes. The one scene with Jane B is enough by itself. I haven’t really experienced that with porn sites. It’s better than I was expecting.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Device friendly. Watch on Desktop, tablet, mobile, TV.
-Digital Desire was recently merged into the Adult Prime network. I believe it no longer exists as a separate site. Hitting the Digital Desire link at PU opens a web page that shows Digital Desire is now part of the Adult Prime network.
-As part of the Adult Prime network, you have access to over 80 different studios.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Digital Desire videos are available in 480p, 720p, 1080p definition.
Newer videos have a 4K option.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor.
-Digital Desire and the Sweethearts Club channels are both excellent sites that are worth joining by themselves. If you're into glamour or teen sites, these are top-of-the-line choices.
-Captcha sometimes required for login.
-Login details assigned. You can't choose your own.
On join page, it says your login details will be sent to you in your confirmation email. That is wrong. Your login details are shown on your join page, but not in the confirmation email of your subscription.
-Pre-checked cross-sales on join page. There are multiple cross-sales on the join pages, so be sure to uncheck all these offers.
-There is a model page, with links to her content at the channel. But there's no bio data on the model, or her physical attributes (height, weight, measurements, hair color, eye color, birth place, etc.).
Bottom Line:
Digital Desire is a glamour site. Photos and videos. Some of the most beautiful models in the world. The girls are 18 to early twenties. Mainly white.
Stephen Hicks was the founder and main contributor to the Digital Desire site.
He was a glamour photographer who died in 2013. He contributed to Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler and other men's magazines in their heyday.
Digital Desire is a large site.
Videos: 1738
Photosets: 3779
Glam Girls: 1320
Most of the videos and photosets are solo girls. There are some sets with 2 girls.
The solo girls feature mastubation. The twosomes are lesbian.
The quality of the photography and the videos is superb. The site was described as softcore glamour, but since the videos feature masturbation, I would consider this mid-core.
If you were a fan of the Penthouse softcore photos of the 1970s, many of the photosets will bring back fond memories of how luscious some of these Penthouse Pet of the Month were.
I admit I'm prejudiced. I find the Digital Desire videos, on average, far more erotic and watchable than the MetArt videos. The Digital Desire videos show masturbation, which the MetArt videos don't. Even leading up to the masturbation parts, the models at Digital Desire can be so fucking cute or desirable that just watching them creates feelings of desire, while watching the MetArt models, although they can be cute to gorgeous, normally leaves you bored and cold. However, the MetArt videos in the last year or so are starting to become more erotic: before, it was mainly a nude model walking around. Now, the models are playing to you, doing a slow strip tease, or moving their bodies in enticing ways.
No men are allowed in Digital Desire or MetArt photos or videos, as far as I can tell (except for the photographers, of course, who are off-screen). However, I once did see the hand of a male photographer in a MetArt photoset. It was a photoset by Paromov, one of their leading photographers. Maybe he was trying to direct the model with his hand?
I'm giving the Digital Desire channel a score of 95. Partly because the channel has lovely models presented with care, in both the photosets and the videos, to be objects of desire.
But also because you get access to the rest of the Adult Prime network, which has even more content worth viewing and collecting. Obviously, not all the content is great, but the Club Sweethearts channel is a fine teen site, with yummy teens that will tease your imagination.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- The site of legendary photographer J. Stephen Hicks, who I mostly knew from Penthouse.
- You have to know what you’re getting into here, 1,737 videos and these are softcore videos. (Will go into in bottom line). The videos are downloadable and the newer ones have 4K.
- Nearly 4,000 photosets and those are downloadable with the resolution topping out at 3000 long end.
- Some of the prettiest models in the world. You probably could guess that with J. Stephen Hicks background.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- Here’s the big news: It’s now included in Adult Prime. I talked about this network last month. This network is making some waves when you add one of the top glam/softcore sites.
- It is still updating, looks like 3-4 photosets per week and the videos are updating very slow. There were 3 in November. (I will go into that in the bottom line too)
- Seamless navigation, how did they pull that off?
Cons:
- It’s going to be too softcore for some.
- The videos even though there is masturbation are very short. Most are under 10 minutes. There’s no lesbian, there’s no male/female.
Bottom Line:
I think this is a big deal to see Digital Desire on a network that I was just talking about has been overlooked. I’ll say the seamless navigation. That could have been a big problem when adding a site like this to a network. What they have done, Digital Desire has its own navigation panel below the network’s navigation panel. When you search Digital Desire’s models it only shows you the models on Digital Desire. A lot of networks have a problem with running their navigation into a site’s navigation. Someone knows what they’re doing.
I think the videos on Digital Desire are underrated. These are not furious masturbation videos. These are women teasing, touching, dildos and masturbating in sexually provocative ways. That’s kind of up my alley, my alley isn’t downhill. I’m just going to pick a random one out that the screencap got my attention. It’s a pretty, blonde named Taylor. You know I picked randomly, or it wouldn’t have been a blonde. She is taking a shower and it turns into her noticing the shower head is hitting all the right places and she doesn’t lose control or start yelling or moaning loudly. It looks real. That is what I always believed was the strength behind this style of porn. You don’t have the model that’s screaming and letting you know they are on a porn set and not really in their at-home bathroom. Nearly all the videos on Digital Desire have this style to them. I don’t want to use the word erotic for some reason but that is what comes to mind. She just accidentally realized she was aroused and did something about it. I enjoy these videos more in 2021 than I did 10 years ago. It’s a nice change of pace from 2021 porn. I should mention outside of a few sites, I don’t think good, new porn has come around in the last decade. I know a lot of our members have similar taste as I have. You should check it out especially with the network it comes with.
The photosets are exactly what you would expect. It’s like looking through an extended penthouse or playboy explicit photo pictorial. It has that classy feel to it. No is going to be offended by anything on here. Unless you wanted to be there to watch. I even like that this network keeps a fairly universal style to their downloads no matter which site it’s on. Digital Desire’s videos can be downloaded in 480p, 720p, 1080p and the newer videos have 4K. I think the ones below 480p is underkill/overkill. I know that those are made for mobile but aren’t most mobile devices 1080p resolution? I’m not the most up to date on cellphones. I do have an iPhone XS and it’s a little over 1080p. Those that know me and my obsessiveness, you know that I’m happy to just see 3-4 download options instead of 8-10.
The models on this site are probably well-known. I don’t know a lot of newer models. There are nearly 1,300 models. I see big names like Aaliyah Love, Abigail Mac, one of my favorites in Adrianna Luna. I will even add a few of the more classic models that you can get here. Aria Giovanni has 23 photosets and 8 videos. Kyla Cole has 48 photosets and 2 videos. Kyla was one of the earliest internet model sensations, really pretty woman and eyes, if you haven’t seen her. One of my all-time favorites, I had no idea she had content on here is Charmane Star with 17 photosets and 9 videos. One that only a few probably remember, the mindblowing, Veronica Zemanova with 24 photosets and 3 videos. This is easily a standalone site that has made it for years on its own and you now receive it with a full network.
The site is highly recommended for those of us that wonder what happened to our porn we remember? I found some! Very impressed with the integration into the network. As long as this network keeps going they have a very bright future.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Look what I stumbled up on. It’s like walking into a 1990s video rental store and entering the backroom.
- All of these are porn classics and the numbers are going to shock you. I hadn’t even noticed this site.
- The names of the stars are even classics, what happened to the days of Big Jack Hammer and Delicious Milano?
- This is like a Wayne’s World found porn stash.
- The part I liked as much as anything? The videos are the complete VHS/DVD. You don’t have download parts.
- The number says it all … 2,422 full classic porn movies, not scenes, the entire movies. That sure is better than finding 2 VHS tapes under my uncle’s bed in the 90s.
- Good download speeds too (80% of my max)
- It’s stashed in the Adult Prime Network.
Cons:
- Well hell, it’s old, 480p is as good as you’re going to get but I have an encoder that will upscale it without screwing it up. I think it will only upscale to 640 but where else are you going to get these classic scenes?
- There are some problems. There is no model list but if you click on the model’s name in the scene description it shows you the other scenes they have and since these models are from the 80s and 90s, it’s going to be from this site. I don’t know how much trouble would be to make a separate model list just for this site.
Bottom Line:
Some of my earliest reviews let out a lot of my porn secrets. My all-time favorite porn series was a classic one from Vivid called, “The Watcher” that was early exhibitionism and voyeurism. A lot of my favorite models were from the 90s and some of them are still performing like Nina Hartley and one I remember most is Kobe Tai. This site takes me back to that time period. Even though some of it is from even earlier. I don’t think any of it goes back before the 80s. There is another site on the network about vintage porn that goes back to the black and white days. That’s too far back for me.
What’s so special about this porn? The “scenes” are downloaded in whole. Some are as long as 90 minutes and there are 3-5 scenes in it. Those porns had to be watched together. They told a story. There’s a theme. There’s recurring characters. I remember watching porn in the 90s that you would sit and watch like a television show. That’s where the classic bom-chi-chi-waa-waa music came from. The scene would be a poorly acted B-level soap opera and then the clothes would start coming and that music would hit. I have had more fun just going through these than I do on most porn sites. Just looking through them. The names were so funny and creative. Or really dumb like Big Jack Hammer, that’s still creative.
What you have here is a 2,422 full-length classic porn video catalog. It can be downloaded; it can be streamed. The names of the movies were even fun. There’s one called Playmate of the Mouth, which will only make sense to those remember Playboy and Playmate of the Month. Here’s you a laugh, The Adventures of Mr. Tootsie Pole. That would probably be politically incorrect today since it’s interracial and it’s comparing the black guy’s dick to a tootsie roll. You’ve heard of Babes in Toyland, what about Sluts in Toyland?
You know what you get the most of from these old movies? It’s not cookie-cutter. That’s why it’s not in scenes. I have talked about Vivid online having problems because they split their DVDs up into scenes. You can download some of those and half of a scene won’t even be porn. It will be a dialogue section. It’s because these movies were made to be watched as a whole story. I didn’t say the story was good. It’s usually not. It’s usually pretty dumb. What you’re not going to run into is as the sex is ending, you’re not going to see the guy (at least not always), push the woman off of him, stick his ass in front of the camera and try to nail a money shot on her face or tongue. Our own personal sex lives are not important here but that is what makes so much porn seem like cookie-cutter. Some couples may pull out and do the facial but it’s not likely to happen every time and it’s not going every 23 minutes. Couples are not going to have missionary, doggy, cowgirl, reverse cowgirl, possibly anal then the cumshot. That is the formula for most porn. These movies do that some but it’s not as obvious.
What I liked best was these are not THAT old. If you like Vivid Classics, these are very similar and it that same time period. Here’s some notable names: Ron Jeremy, Seka, Nina Hartley, Mike Horner, Tom Byron who was very popular in those days, Christy Canyon, one of the first pornstars I remember seeing and wanting to see more of – Alexandra Silk. And the jaw-dropping Keisha, which means Peter North is on here somewhere. I have heard that Peter North would film with Keisha for free.
As much positive as I have had to say there still are a few problems. Besides the no model list. A lot of the scenes don’t link to the stars in the scene. Their names will be in the description but no link. Only the biggest stars have the link to their other scenes. I don’t know if it’s just I need to reset my connection. The last movie I tried to download was downloading at a terrible speed. I can usually download at over 100MB/s and I was at 1MB/s, maybe the kinks are being worked out. Either way, this is like a gold mine of classic porn, especially being able to download the full movies. The last one I tried said 540p in the filename and it was 1.8GB so the quality isn’t terrible. I am going to temper my score a little. If these kinks get worked out this is a 95 minimum for me.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fresh faced teens you probably never saw before
Tags for searching
Part of Adult Prime network of over 75 sites
Adding scenes once a week
Uses Epoch as a biller
Cons:
All remastered videos. The quality varies quite a bit as some of the original videos are not possible to convert to modern quality. However remastered is better than unwatchable quality.
The site needs growth as there are almost 50 videos, but there are many, many more older scenes that need a makeover sitting in the Club Sweetheart archives.
Bottom Line:
This site had its origins as a magazine in 1995 and was then called Club Seventeen. The models have always been of legal age, 18 and older and this was just a name. Recently it has been renamed as Club Sweethearts and is the main site within the Adult Prime network. As many of its scenes were filmed before High Definition became available, many of the better scenes need an upgrade. Those scenes that have been redone are now on this site, Sweetheart Classics. As of right now, there are almost fifty scenes that have been remastered. I hope many more are redone as the content really caught my interest.
Much of the porn made in recent years has been dull and too much like they are made in a factory. Many scenes are ten minutes of this, five minutes of that and another ten minutes of another act. The models change, but the scenes are almost clones. A few years ago, porn was a bit more creative.
Seventeen of the scenes are groups with a lesbian theme. They are named: lesbian swimming team, lesbian garden party, five girl lesbian pop group, lesbian orgy, seven girls and a bottle of oil, all girl water polo team, lesbian orgy at the stables, lesbian sex Olympics, four girl dildo party, lesbian army invasion, three sporty lesbians, four girls, two water bikes, four girl lesbian carwash, ballet girl orgy, five girls in a foam bath, a three girl get together. There are seven other lesbian scenes. There are also seven group scenes with boy/girl sex. The mix may change as they add content, but as of today it seems to me to have a theme of a lot of group lesbian sex scenes that I like. I read once that in porn today they do not use very many models in a scene and that is to reduce cost. In a group scene, you can see a lot of interaction in ways that modern porn does not attempt. There is always another pussy to be seen, always another one to be licked, always another with a toy or a wand being used. Sometimes there are two or three on one and often the pairings switch. It reminds me of a sex buffet.
The models are young and thin white women from Eastern Europe. I am not sure how many went on to a porn career or how many have their only scene here. It seemed to me they are fresh and eager with that special glow of exploratory sex. I thought the models added some natural sexiness to the visuals. In reading some of the replies to the videos, members have posted that some of them have another porn name that they have used.
I can’t say there is much I don’t like about the content, but for me they seem to use more toys and wands than I would prefer. That may be a hint that they are made for male fantasy or it may just be that is how lesbian porn was made then. I am basically nitpicking, but I like more tender lesbian sex and a bit more of a relaxed pace. Don't get me wrong, I liked the scenes here. One of my teachers once told me there is always room for improvement.
In all fairness, as much as they try to improve the quality of older videos, they don’t look anywhere near as sharp and clear as newly made High Definition ones are. There is only so much you can do to enhance the quality, but there are many scenes here that I would not have even bothered trying before they were remastered. The site was easy to use, the tags let you have an easy search, the download speeds fast enough and with over 75 sites in the network, more than enough to keep you busy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Currently offering the bargain price of $9.95 for the first month.
Billing by Epoch with the option to use Paypal.
Site has been updating 3 to 4 times a week for the duration of my membership.
Large archive dating back 20 plus years.
Photo sets in up to 5 sizes, 800,1024,1280,1600 & 3000 px.
Zip downloads for photos but only in the largest available size.
Recent videos have up to 8 download options where 4k is available, 2160p, 1080p,720p,480p,360p & mobile in h264 format plus a 720p & 480p wmv option.
Streaming options Low, Normal, 720p,1080p & 4k.
User features include ratings, comments and add to favourites.
No problem using my download manager. (DTA)
Cons:
Recurs at around $30 after the first month.
Pre-checked cross sale.
Updates regularly consist of recycled or remastered old content.
Some recent updates consist of non exclusive purchased content, I'm guessing they are not currently shooting due to the pandemic.
Not a huge amount of 4k content although not a problem for me as I don't download it.
If you're not into solo masturbation content you won't find a lot to interest you here.
Oldest content is lower resolution which is to be expected on a site that's been around this long.
Bottom Line:
Site stats as of today 2nd August 2020:
Models: 1327
Photo sets: 3893
Videos: 1712
This is a site I've joined three times before but not since 2011, so my first time to go back and check it out since the death in 2013 of the main photographer and creator of the site J.Stephen Hicks. Since I've already collected all the photo sets issued prior to 2011 on my previous visits I just focused on the newer content since 2011 on this visit. The models who caught my eye this time include Alex Grey, Elena Koshka,, Emily Willis, Gia Paige, Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox and Uma Jolie. One thing I've always liked about this site is the nice selection of exotic models thanks to their featured “ethnic” category. Some of the ethnic models I really like include Alex De La Flor, Ivy Sherwood, Marica Hase, Megan Salinas, Noelle Monique, Scarlett Bloom and a pretty, large breasted ebony babe named Jezebel Vessir who I first noticed at MetArt a couple of months ago. Incidentally Charles Lightfoot who shot Jezebel's sets and many of the other Amercican models who appear at MetArt is also one of the photographers here at Digital Desire.
The vast majority of the site's content (around 95%) features solo females in artistic, erotic photo sets and videos including masturbation and occasional toy use. If you checkout their “Girlfriends” category you can find the lesbian content which includes 69 videos but nothing new has been added to this category since November 2018. It looks like they experimented with boy/girl hardcore porn for a brief while. If you check out their “Couples” category you'll find a handful of boy/girl shoots, 8 videos and 8 photo sets to be precise, all issued around 2015-16.
When it comes to browsing the site you have the usual categories of Videos, Photos and an A-Z model index. You then have another 15 sub categories to help you find more specific interests you might have. Aside from the Couples, Girlfriends and Ethnic categories already mentioned above others include Dreamgirls, Amateurs, Young N Fresh,Toy Lovers, Flashback and Backstage. Within each category you can then refine your search by criteria such as Hair Colour, Breast size and Pubic Hair.
Whilst the site has been updating 3 to 4 times a week during my membership when I look back through the updates from the past couple of months I don't see an awful lot that looks like new exclusively shot content. Just in the last week the updates were a photo set and video of Heather Summers who as far as I'm aware retired somewhere around 2011 and a Flashback remastered photo set of Sandra Shine who seems to have been around as long as I have had the internet. The video of Heather Summers had a maximum resolution of 480p so it's clearly more than 10 years old as even in my 2011 membership here they were producing videos in 720p. They also seem to be adding non exclusive purchased content similar to that found at sites like Teen Mega World and Club Seventeen. I know for a fact the video and photo set of the cute Asian girl named Aliona added in June of this year dates from around 2012 as I previously downloaded it from Club Seventeen where she was named Sevil. Looking at the update schedule for the month ahead they also have more of her Club Seventeen sets scheduled as future updates.
Although my main interest is the photo collection I've always found the videos at Digital Desire better than those at most similar solo nude/glamour type sites. They certainly contain more heat than the ones at MetArt for instance. They mostly start out with the model dressed in some clothing or lingerie then teasing and stripping before masturbating. There's background music at the start of the video which fades away as the model gets down to the action. Average runtime is around 10 to 15 minutes. I downloaded the 1080p versions which had a bitrate around 6000k.
Other features at the site include the Daily Photo, a Featured Model, a Daily Desktop and a Blog. There's also a link to what looks like a store selling sex toys but I can't enter as I just get a page saying “connection not secure, the owner has configured their website improperly”. Oh well, looks like no chance of me getting the free cock ring LKLK mentioned in his recent review.
In summary, 9 years on from my last membership here, I would say this is still a good site for collectors of softcore glamour content and good value at less than $10 but the seemingly increased use of recycled old sets and non exclusive content as updates means I'm going to score it a few points lower than I did in 2011.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They've had a special discount of $9.95 for the first month for a while now. If you don't see that price listed, I'd wait for a holiday special price of $9.95 for the first month, since there are all kinds of holidays they offer that price at.
-They have an outstanding collection of beautiful and lovely models in the 18-early 20s age range.
-They have both photo sets and videos. The photo sets are offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-The videos are also offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-If you know what the site is, a stand-alone softcore glamour site of lovely young women, your expectations should be met. Don't expect hardcore action.
-The biggest con is probably that they constantly delete older material. Members often complain about it. I don't know why they delete when it irritates their members so much.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for most porn sites.
-No information on the models, except for the model's name.
-If you spend $75 at their on-site store, you get a free cock ring. Flash this cock ring at your local gay bar, and you can be the life of the party (sick joke?).
-This is a stand-alone site. No bonus sites are included with your membership.
-Video resolution goes up to 1080p. There are a few 4K videos, but they are definitely in the minority. Many PU members want a 4K option at the sites they join.
-Zip file for photosets is only offered in one definition. Strange for a glamour photosite.
-Some hot links don't work correctly.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Photosets: 3,800+
Videos: 1,000+
Models: 700+
Stephen Hicks died in 2013. He was the main photographer and owner of the Digital Desire website.
He specialized in high quality glamour photography over a decades long career.
His work appeared in such adult magazines as Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, High Society and many more when those types of magazines were in their heyday (late 1960s through the 1980s).
He had an eye for beautiful women. And he presented them lovingly in softcore glamour photography.
One common complaint from the site members is that a lot of the content has been disappearing for many years. Not sure why. You have memories of some outstanding photographs, you come to the site, and it's not there any more. Which can be disappointing. This can happen at different websites, but the Digital Desire site is almost famous for deleting content.
They have over 700 models, most range from attractive to lovely.
Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox, Bailey Rayne, Keisha Grey, Shyla Jennings, Jade Couture, Kenze Thomas, Kasey Chase, Victoria Valmer, Aubrey Belle, the list of gorgeous women just goes on and on.
How a model is presented can make a world of difference in how attractive she looks. Digital Desire, under Stephen Hicks, was famous for its softcore glamcore approach.
Since he died in 2013, the site has featured a harder edge: it's not hardcore, but what you could call midcore, with female masturbation, lesbian. But I couldn't find what you would normally call hardcore, which features men having sex with women. No men at the site (except for the photographers).
Note: the site did feature female masturbation and lesbian before 2013, but it was with a softcore approach. I'm not explaining this very well. Let's call this a softcore site featuring some female masturbation and lesbian activity.
If you are a fan of the Playboy and Penthouse magazine photo layouts from the 1970s, then this site will probably appeal to you. Stephen Hicks contributed to those magazines. He had an eye for beautiful young women, and presented them in a loving glamcore setting. In both indoor and outdoor shoots.
Many photographers seem to have a problem with outdoor shoots. With the lighting or sound control or other factors. But the Digital Desire site has a professional approach that showcases the photo sets and videos and they are just a pleasure to view. And the soundtrack, which can often be annoying with random sounds or over-loud music at some sites, is not distracting. The Digital Desire site just presents you with a polished, softcore product, which is what you are looking for.
Although this site does not compare in amount of content versus such mega-sites as MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, I think it's definitely worth a join, if you are a fan of softcore glamcore photography.
Especially with the $9.95 price for the first month of membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Vintage and classic porn DVDs from the 1960s – early 2000s.
Downloadable magazine photo sets from the Private magazines also going back to the 1960s.
The site is laid out well, with selections for movies, models, magazines, 00s, 90s, 80, 70s, 60s, also has a section for black and castings.
Currently have exactly 400 models with some having over 100 scenes each.
Just under 1,900 scenes, unlimited downloads.
Can also search by full DVDs, there are around 300 full DVDs, including the very first porn DVD I watched.
Cons:
I am not for sure how much of a con this is, but the videos have only one download option. Besides that, a lot of these scenes seem very short (some under 5 minutes).
No category search or tags
They have updated, but there are no dates and no way to know how often they update.
The filenames do not have the DVD’s title in them.
Bottom Line:
One of my favorite sites is Vivid. I only watch their “classic” DVDs. The stories are usually at least better than we see in current DVDs and I think the models are more believably into the scenes as in newer porn DVDs. I was recommended this site as similar to Vivid Classics and in some ways, it is, in other ways it is not.
I do like the magazines section. Being from India, I have very little experience with the porn magazines and seeing the photo shoots from those shows how much porn has progressed.
One part I misread was I thought I also received access to private.com, which has their newer scenes on it, but you have to join it separately.
I have not watched a lot of the oldest scenes. I like the 90s and 2000s. They not only have some story and continuity from scene to scene, but also do not feel like current porn. The production does not seem as planned out. When I watch newer DVD scenes it seems like they follow the same exact plan from start to finish in every scene. These scenes sometimes will just have oral or a quick sex scene that leads into the next scene. It is too bad these DVDs cannot be downloaded as one whole part. Considering the scenes are mostly standard definition (480p range), it makes the files small and I would think a full DVD would be under 1GB.
There is a good selection of models. I know of some of them. And even though it seems like some of the scenes have been edited, these are still the only porn DVDs I really like. You can even get a porn history lesson here by watching the DVDs from the different decades. I think I would call it the evolution of the cumshot. The older scenes were mostly body cumshots, then the boobs cumshots and into facials in the newer scenes.
I do not know why these older scenes have a more authentic feel to them, but they do. Maybe they were better actresses?
The site really needs a tag system or categories. You are just handed the site with newest updates and have to decide what looks good without knowing what happens in the scene.
The first DVD I downloaded was Tatiana 1 which was the first porn DVD I ever watched. I thought it was older than the site lists it as 1/1/1998, but it was still fun watching it again.
There are a similar number of classic scenes here as on Vivid’s site, the quality is overall similar to Vivid’s classic scenes and the stories are as well. I think that is the market this site would appeal to. If you are into classic Vivid DVDs, I believe you would like this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Great looking girls with tons of content.
Poses are erotic displaying "worked up" girls in passion rather than smiling to the camera.
Low price.
Cons:
Older sets (around pre-2009) are skimpy and lower quality.
The most disorganized high quality site I have ever seen. Even your own bookmarking touches don't totally play out-inexcuscable.
Bottom Line:
This would be a 99-100 score for me if not for the downright shoddy interface of the site including sets not in date order.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Photo sets from the 1960s and '70s display a playfulness, a carefree approach to hanky panky only possible in a HIV free era.
-1st month is under 21 bucks with PU's discount.
-Ah, memories: For those of a certain age, Private XXX magazines were the first taste of hardcore. VHS was still years away.
-Attn youngsters: see what postal inspectors used to devote thousands of work hours to intercept.
Cons:
-Tagline .."..since 1965." yet the oldest videos only date to the late 1980s.
-Eye-watering, mind-boggling, erection-softening effect of clothes, hairdos, household interiors & infrequent shaving from the 60s and 70s.
Bottom Line:
By the late 1980s, Private was on the cusp of cranking out a steady flow of hardcore films with high production values often filmed at exotic locations. To get to that future, Private had to shoot sets that, while not in the same league as say 'Deepthroat' or Playboy, kept the studio lights on, the staff paid. These are the results.
As stated the oldest vids date only to the late 1980s. That's my guess as none carry the production year. Obviously porn stars are desired when fresh then less so as they grow shop-worn then face a transition period when they are either snicked at or admired for their locked in an era appearance. IMAO the gals featured in this 1986-9 stuff have a way to go, dare I say ten years?, before they can be considered hot or even retro by today's audience.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
The photography is excellent and unlike some sites (ahem, MetArt) they avoid putting the models into uncomfortable looking positions in uncomfortable places. Seeing models posing on beds or couches is far more common than the photographer trying to drape the model over a rock in a forest.
They have a great selection of glamor models. Even better, while many sites only give you their older photos in smaller, lower resolutions (I'm looking at you Twistys), this site keeps the photos, and the videos, in their original full size and high resolution.
The videos are visually well done and tend to avoid the cheesy music that mar other sites. They tend to be a bit unoriginal though (see "cons" below)
The models are a nice selection of races and ethnicities, although they could do better.
Cons:
They are increasingly relying on older (1980s) photo sets, which probably appeal to a smaller section of their subscribers. Expect to see lots of models with 1980s hair and stockings.
The videos follow a fairly standard pattern that becomes repetitious after awhile. Unfortunately they stopped their series of "Flirt" videos where the girls talked to the camera. I wish they'd bring them back.
They briefly tried a few hard core videos. They were well done and should be continued.
The search function is pretty good to adequate. Seen some better, but have seen many which are worse worse.
I have not come across the deleted content yet, but the "Extreme" material that apparently was removed did not appeal to me. Be aware that some older material is gone now.
Bottom Line:
Great glamor site with hundreds and hundreds of beautiful women. However, it's best days may be behind it. Well worth it if you like to go back and see models that have retired from the business especially as you'll find good high resolution videos and photos whereas other sites will only show you the older, low-res archival files. Keep in mind about 99% is soft-core material so if you want hard core, this is not the site for you.
I have not had the download problems others have complained about. The videos and photos files I have downloaded have done so smoothly and quickly.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very large and comprehensive photo section dating back over 100 years.
Includes probably some of the oldest photos and smut videos available, though its unlikely that they are exclusive.
No pre-checked cross-sell.
CCBill and Epoch are two of the processors, though I had issues with CCBill. See comments.
Streaming for most videos is available plus unlimited downloads.
Meaningful file names for most videos which includes year of release in the name most of the time.
For its time, good video and photo quality. Videos remastered in digital avi or mp4 format, though only 1 DL option. The old stuff was undoubtedly shot mostly in 8mm or16mm. Photos show little wear and tear, i.e., scratches.
Daily updates.
Free 1-day trial with full access however, see comments.
Each video lists the stats, i.e., year, format, size, duration, resolution and date added.
HTTPS.
Cons:
A huge drawback: photo content only available as individual downloads.
Viewing option for photos is laborious and antiquated.
Not really a con because Its unavoidable but Ill mention it so that there arent any unrealistic expectations although digitized, the videos are low quality as are the older photos.
No search tools.
Poor navigation.
Signing up was fraught with problems, see comments. However, I did get a discounted price of $15.95 recurring at $15.95 regular price is $29.95 recurring at $29.95.
Bottom Line:
Pornography has a long and rich history. One of the earliest pieces of evidence dates back 25,000 years! A 4 statue of Venus of Willendorf dating back to that period was discovered in Austria. There is further evidence of statues and explicit images throughout ancient times. A major game changer was the invention in 1440 of the Gutenberg Press. As a result, the first book of erotic engravings was published in 1524. Then came the invention of photography in 1839 which basically ushered pornography into todays modern era. That is roughly where Vintage Cuties begins its foray into porn, a.k.a., smut, dirt, erotica, filth.
Vintage Cuties may be the only site youll ever need for a titillating reference of what Ill loosely refer to as modern porn, the era following the invention of photography. The site includes a vast photo collection as well as an abundance of videos from 1850 to the 1990s. At least some of the content is member submitted. While the quality of the photos and videos reflects the standards of the time, the content on VC seems mostly free of excessive wear and tear, i.e., scratches. Of course, the quality of the content from 30+ years ago seems primitive by todays HD standards. But alas, that is part of the charm.
There are several other sites included with membership but they warrant no attention. They are unrelated to vintage porn. While the content is mostly current (within 10 years), quality and content lack any redeeming values. For example, theres a site Home Made Junk, an apt title, and consists of poor quality photos and short poor quality videos. These sites detract from the main site and I recommend not spending more than a few minutes, if that much, checking them out.
The site is painful to navigate. Hitting the back button doesnt always take you to the last page viewed. It sometimes took 4 or so clicks to get back to the menu. This is frustrating. On a similar note and another major drawback is the lack of any search feature. However, there is an extensive menu.
The photos are the real draw, at least for me. This is an enormous section consisting of 200,000 photos (as per the site) and one which you can spend days going through. However, it is unforgivable that the files are not zipped and you cannot download the sets, only individual photos.
The oldest photos date back to 1850 and were shot using t process known as daguerreotype, a photograph taken by the earliest photographic process introduced in 1839 employing an iodine-sensitized silvered plate and mercury vapor.
As mentioned, the menu is extensive and logical. The photo section includes many subsets. Theyre separated by date range (1850 - 1920, 1920 - 1940, 1940 1950, 1950 1970, 1970 1980 and 1980 1990). There are different subsets under each period. For example, under 1850 1920, subsets include daguerreotypes, erotica, fetish, filthy, risqu cards and world people. In case youre wondering, the filthy stuff is the hardcore smut, erotica consists simply of nudes, fetish is mostly spanking and bondage, world people consists generally of Africans and risqu cards which are simply nude photos. Each period has different subsets.
Also listed in the photos section after the options for date ranges are further options, some which only serve to confuse, others which are lots of fun. The options following the date range options are:
Amateurs 1,000 photos from circa 1980s.
Burlesque 1,400 photos - the title says it all, undated but Ill guess 1960s 1980s
Covers & Posters 2,000 images of what seems to be entirely magazine covers apparrently from the 1950s 1980s
Exotic Art 2,000 images of erotica drawings again, undated but seemingly spans the early 20th century thru more modern times
Magazines 1,350 sets (~30,000 photos) with subsections by time period from 1880 to 1990. Some sets include only photos from the magazines and others seem to include the entire magazine. Very comprehensive and fun.
Playing Cards 360 images of, guess what? -)
Retro Ads over 100 sets (~5,000 images) of ads seemingly most from the 1950s, mostly nostalgic but not erotic. Remember Schlitz beer? Beech-nut gum?
Retro Stars 100s of mostly pinup models which tally several thousand photos - subsections by time period from the 1920s to 1980s. Retro stars include the likes of Josephine Baker (the oldest one and from 1920), Jean Harlow, Barbara Eden (clothed), Rita Moreno (clothed), Betty Blue, Anita Ekberg, Babette Bardot, Annie Sprinkle, etc. A fun section.
Unfortunately, viewing the photos is a tedious task. There is sort of a slide show feature but its not automatic and its time consuming. In addition, navigating to and from sets often requires several mouse clicks. Im confused why they would have such a fantastic and enormous photo section with very limited viewing and download options.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
05-26-1704:07am (Update History) Reason: After spending more time on the site, I decided the site merits a higher score. The site does most everything right for what it is.
Pros:
$20.95 for 1 month with PU discount, recurring at $29.95.
RocketPay and Epoch are the credit card processors, trusted companies.
Although various sizes, quality of images is high resolution, jpeg.
A random selection of videos (mp4) indicates 720. While remastered and not true HD, they are of good quality considering their age.
1,189 photo sets (detailed below) which translates to about 60,000 photos.
55 DVDs and nearly 900 video scenes.
Updating at about 1 DVD per week along with regular scene updates.
Streaming and downloading; full DVDs and scenes can be streamed.
No buffering issue with streaming; good streaming quality.
Models look more natural compared to todays state of affairs.
Cons:
Pre-checked cross-sell at signup.
Membership does not include access to any other sites in the Private network.
DVDs cannot be downloaded streaming only.
Poor organization of videos, see comments.
Nonsensical file naming scheme.
Basic search only, i.e., no category search.
Non HTTPS
Bottom Line:
For those not familiar, a little background. Private Classics is a part of the Private Media Group which was founded in Sweden in 1965. Its magazine was the first color hardcore magazine. The first intercourse scene was published in 1967 which was groundbreaking in paving the way for explicit porn. Private is known for high budget videos and has won major AVN awards. The Classics site is for those looking for nostalgia. I was pleasantly surprised by the high quality explicit photos from the magazine. The was a more innocent time in porndom. Private seems to have been in a class by itself in that it combined explicit smut with high-end production values.
The photos are probably the main attraction with the videos and digitized magazines the icing on the cake. There are three distinct sections: videos, photos and magazines. Although any one of these sections could probably have gotten by as a distinct site, they are interrelated. The videos are from the 90s or early 00s while the magazine and photos span 4 decades from the 60s to the 00s.
The site is well organized and is generally simple to navigate once you get the hang of it. The videos, photo sets and magazines are separated by menu sections. The photos and magazines are then further segregated by decade. There is also a model section (which can be viewed any one of 3 ways) which includes all the content for each model, i.e., videos and photos. There is also a brief comment about the model as well as her vital statistics.
The video organization is confusing. I never completely figured out the distinction between the two video sections offered, Movies and Scenes. The Movies section lists the DVDs and you can stream the entire DVD. On the same page are scenes from the DVD which are available for download and streaming. The Scenes section seems to be a duplication of the content in the Movies section though there seems to be more scenes in the Scenes section. There is no explanation on the site for the distinction. After a while and only by scrutinizing, I noticed some differences. Regardless, there is no point in having 2 video sections.
Another peeve, though minor, is with the ordering of the DVDs and scenes. The Movie section (DVDs) seems to have no rhyme or reason to the manner which DVDs are listed, like chronologically. The Scenes section seems to list scenes in order of date added regardless of when they were filmed. However, it is not a major issue since all the videos are from the 1990s or early 00s.
There is only one download option for the videos though theres no indication of the quality. A random selection of videos shows them to be 720. However, since the videos are about 20 years old, they were obviously remastered and the quality is not true HD. All things considered though, the quality is satisfactory (full screen with a 27" monitor).
The videos reflect the magazine. The action is hardcore and varied including lesbian, straight, orgies, blowjobs and anal. To the delight of some, there is an inordinate number of group scenes and plenty of anal. Scenes run from about 10 to 30 minutes with an average of 20 minutes. The videos are unlike other hardcore. They are unique in various ways interesting locales like Mars [!!] coupled with above-average direction and camera-work. There are generally plots with at least an attempt at good acting. Most of the videos seem to be in French, many of which are dubbed in English. The models are European, good looking and seem to average in the upper 20s in age. The models have more of a natural look with a minimum of tattoos and silicone.
The photo sets are taken from the magazine. All the photos from the magazine seem to be in the photo section, so you can skip the, uh, intellectual articles in the magazine. However, dont skip it! They are downloadable in PDF and pleasing to the eye. Looking at the old magazines was a blast.
Photosets are zipped and sets range from a handful of photos to over 100; Ill guesstimate the average is 50 photos per set. As mentioned, photo quality is very good. A random spot check shows good compression quality. My abacus reveals the following statistics:
History was always a favorite subject. Private Classics is like a hot stroll down memory lane. Hosiery, high heels, honey bee hairdos, latex suits and natural breasts will take you back to a bygone era. This is a classy site and all 3 offerings - photos, magazines and videos, all merit praise. I found the Private material - magazines and videos, refreshing in that it was innovative, natural, shot in interesting places, and most of all, highly erotic Once you figure out the best way to use the site, there are a large library of photos, videos and magazine to keep you occupied endlessly.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+They have a library of over 10,500 movies to chose from.
+They have over 5000 performers to chose from.
+The videos can streamed online.
+The videos can be downloaded in the MP4 format.
+Many of their movies are not available anywhere else(except VOD sites).
+Many of the movies are in their original language(see cons).
+Many of the movies have tag words to help search for specific types of scenes.
+You can also search by production year, models name or just the first letter of the movie.
+They have added a series of photos to most of the performers portfolio and some appear to be from fans(they can't be downloaded).
Cons:
-The site stopped updating on March 11 and it's not looking like they are about to start anytime soon.
-The video quality is varies a lot from movie to movie but it rarely gets better than mediocre to good.
-Because many of their movies aren't made in the USA than at least 1/3 are in a language other than English.
-It's common for an American made movie not to be in English because their source material is from another Country that the US.
-They haven't tagged all the movies so doing a search by keywords won't give all the possible results.
-The content is primarily from the 70's and 80's with a percentage from the 90's so not likely to appeal to anyone under 30.
Bottom Line:
*This has always been one of my favorite sites because they have some of my favorite movies of all time and now that it appears that they are dead than I honestly don't know where I can go to find all those amazing classic porn movies from by gone days.
*Now I can understand why many people especially those under the age of thirty who would never join a site like this because the bulk of their movies are scenario driven where the sex scenes are often much shorter than today and the video quality is not all that stellar but to those people I say that there is a reason why many of these are true classics that are worth seeing if for no other reason than the people who produced them understood how to make movies and not just shoot porn.
*Another huge appeal for me is that because a portion of their movies are in their original language than movies made in France are in French and for someone like me who speaks French that is amazing.
*The reasons why I'm still giving this site a pretty good score is because their library is huge, they only offer a one month or three month membership and they made some improvements since my last membership.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
The photography at digitaldesire.com is up there with the best. I've got nothing but admiration for the photographic acumen of the photographer who founded the site, the late, great J Stephen Hicks. His photography alone warrants a top score, but as you will see, there are other factors that I have to factor into this review. The good:
-over 700 models
-high quality, artistic glamour photos
-3198 photo sets
-resolution ranging from 3000x3000 to 711x466
-1323 videos
-resolution ranging from 1080P to 720P
-weekly updates
Cons:
Unfortunately, the cons tend to overshadow the pros at this site:
-extensive amount of older content has been removed from the site
-removal of older content continues despite ongoing objections from members
-support is unresponsive
Bottom Line:
When I join a site and plan to review it, I try to step outside of my own personal experience, and try to see it from the standpoint of who I imagine their typical customer to be. That being said, so that you can understand ny bias which I have tried to eliminate from the score, here is my personal experience.
I joined because I once saved a freaking amazing DDGXtreme photo of Michelle Michaels "squirting" (judging by the massive stream, she was really peeing, but all the better) for a DDGXtreme shoot. I joined the site, hoping to get this whole set and more, but found nothing. No squirting or peeing remained in their members section. So I asked support about it, and I got crickets.
Meanwhile, I checked their members forum, and learned that my experience was not unique. The forum is full of complaints about DDG removing old sets. This is apparently the way they have managed their site all along, even in the J Stephen Hicks days, with complaints about large segments of content missing going back before 2008.
Here's some history on the DDGXtreme content. Back in the mid 2000's, they noticed that more "extreme" content tended to sell better, even though it was not something that Hicks was into. The reluctantly shot it anyway and released it under the DDGXtreme section of the site. It included closeups, fingering, and penetration with dildos, while the majority of their content was strictly softcore nudes. I have the evidence that they shot a squirting scene too, although no one else among prior DDG customers who I have talked with seems to remember any squirting.
Around 2007, they decided to roll all of their content together as they re-launched their site as digitaldesire.com. Their official line is that the DDG content got rolled in with the DDGXtreme content. This is true in a sense - the DDG content that remains is intermixed with the DDGXtreme content that remains. The truth that they avoid addressing directly in the forums, and that members bring up again and again, is that large numbers of scenes from both DDG and DDGXtreme were lost when they re-launched digitaldesire.com. So as disappointed as I was as someone joining DDG looking for a rare squirting scene, I do not feel my score is too low, because the DDG forum is full of members who love the softcore shoots that DDG is known for, who are complaining about about missing scenes.
There are occasional cases where someone from DDG has responded to these complaints in their forum. The initial response was that they were remastering some older scenes. Their latest response was something along the lines of saying that all of the existing scenes have been remastered, but they will talk with the people doing that work to see if there are any more. The truth that went unsaid was that there are many scenes that do not exist anymore.
On one hand, I can only be so critical. I give the three photographers still at DDG a lot of credit for continuing to run the site, despite the tragic loss of Hicks, and for at least making some of his content available. Nine times out of ten a photographer such as Hicks does not have anyone to carry on his legacy, so I give credit for that. That is the sole reason that I did not ask for a refund - because I kind of respect that. The problem is, while I am glad DDG keeps some of this content available, they just don't do a great job at it. It is what it is.
I hope they have a forgotten archive somewhere that they can search through and do right by their members. While I came to this site with tastes that differ from the typical DDG member, I think my experience was actually typical.
Sites that habitually remove old content will only ruin their brand in the long run.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Big collection of exclusive content.
Zip ==200mb wmv = 300mb mp4 =300mb (whatever)
Seemingly all shoots are done on DD's own turf.
Ample Photo gallery featuring each model.
1,055+ video Scenes (approx. 15 min. each).
Video HD. Sharp images. Streaming with flash player. 2-3 second buffer. although this observer might argue that point.
Very nice playbacks. might even win you over from downloading.
7 day updates (With no less than 5 image galleries; four full videos.
Soft core,...no hard stuff; all solo, but acted out by women so incredibly beautiful that
hardcore fanatics are left not giving a f...k ....
Few scattered tattoos. Ample Space allotted for viewer comments on each model
Primary niche: Photography: which is quite Plentiful. videos: also in the high numbers.
Attractive TBP introductory discount at the time I joined.
Download managers (yes)
Cons:
Wildly popular with the gals here is one of my greatest peeves ... that of endless insertion of their their little hands and fingers in their mouths .... all whilst vigorously wanking away as if these digital appendages were lollypops laced with opium based sweeteners.
Might wanna Look out for tricky buddy-sites that sparingly dwell within corners of some pages, beckoning you in.
I ultimately found cancelling a bit un-nerving:
Although could very easily be my own shortcoming -- but I did seem to experience some tenacity on the part of saying Bye-Bye to these folks. Finally had to call epoch billing to get the results I wanted.
Bottom Line:
This site looks every bit to live up to its title: "Desire" is everywhere. Some of these gal's acts are piling up such gun-powder one has to hold down the artillery.
Girls are from 18 to 30yrs, and wields the kind of glamor and curves that look hand-made by the Gods.
I was looking at this site for a long time before reaching for the plastic. Luckily helped along by DD with being given a deal I couldn't refuse.
And I gotta say ..... I'm really not the least disappointed I choose to jump in.
Caveats ???? ......OH YEAH!
Here's another bunch hung-up on Superfluous Vaginal close ups.
Geeeze! When will they ever listen and learn? Enough is enough!
Thanks to vaginal-obsessed cameramen, I'm now an expert on every aspect of the female genitalia.... including even the behavioral habits of amoebae-like creeper-crawlers that roam the epidermis and love dining on the unique women's aromatic sheading .
How much further can the lens go? ....lest the camera territorially eventually wind-up scouting the ovaries.
Would I recommend Digital Desire? Yes I would.
However, if you've been to those sites, Twisty and the likes thereof offer some of the same kind of heart-thumping power!
But DD does have those selected gals who look so much to be uniquely hand-made by the Gods.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+You get access to some very rare content.
+They update with 2 new movies every day.
+Their offer movies not only from the US but France, Germany and Italy as well.
+Some of their Foreign movies are not dubbed into English but in their original language.
+They have small bio's of both the male and female performers with a link to their movies on the site and also to a dvd site where you can buy some of the dvd's.
+They have some third party advertising but it is usually quite small and rarely located where you can see it without looking for it.
-They offer some pics of the stars but don't expect much.
Cons:
-Video quality is rather poor to horrible on a lot of their movies.
-They offer you access to 3 other sites but one has the same stuff as this site, one is mostly stag films and one is gay porn.
-Some of the movies may be made in the US but the copy they have is their European versions so the dialogue is not in English.
-They have a search by keyword but I would avoid it as most of the movies are not properly tagged.
-The navigation is basically choosing a page and then skipping to the next one.
-Some movies are split into many scenes while others are whole.
Bottom Line:
*This is possibly one of the most bittersweet sites that I have ever joined in large part because I love so much of the content and yet really dislike the fact that the quality of the print is so poor that it borders on the unwatchable on many of the titles. Mind you that is not that unusual since the bulk of the content offered by this site is 20 years or older.
*The first and most important thing is that the guys behind this site need to start looking for better copies of their movies and/or try to remaster them to improve the quality. I don't expect that any of the movies will ever make it much above average but that would be more than fine with me as I'm not interested in HD quality anyway.
*The second thing is that they start looking for more titles from their featured stars so that we get access to a wider choice of movies from them. Of course this may be almost impossible to do because there may truly be no copies left anywhere. I hope that this isn't the case because there are many movies that were so amazing that they again deserve to see the light of day.
**I don't know to whom this site will appeal to except people like me who are nostalgic for golden age porn and can overlook flaws in the quality of those videos.
**My score has a lot less to do with quality and more to do with the rarity of the content offered by this site
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the net's most beautiful imagery
Many, many US models you've heard of.
Some files back to 2003 and beyond
Zip files in many sizes for most sets, some up to 3000k.
Many videos now in 720P
Good layout and consistent navigation
Many of the best US models in the industry have their roots here.
Very good variety of models, most of whom have exceptional proportions.
The download process isn't bad if you aren't trying to download every image on the site.
It seems like they may be rescanning older 35mm sets in higher resolution when they re-release them, but I can't tell for sure.
Some content goes back as far as 2003. That's ALOT of images.
No cross selling!
For the price, you can't go wrong. (Part of why I rate them so high)
Cons:
Site seems a bit slow to load compared to others
Recycling of old images cheats number of new releases.
Only 1 release per day and almost ALL of them are re-releases. (Less than 1 new set per week)
Quantity of new releases really seems to be dropping (Quality is good, though).
No original dates on sets so you can't tell if it is old. Chance are very good that it is.
Older videos in 480P or less and with no original dates for the models, you can't tell until you click down.
Bottom Line:
Important bits:
Mostly solo scenes with a few very good girl/girl softcore scenses (good because the girls are usually into each other and not just standing there.)
No boy/girl scenes that I recall.
Very few toys....but a reasonable number of fingers.
Good mix of outdoor and indoor scenes. These guys love sunlight (a very good thing for the images and girls, apparently) so many of the indoor sets are actually set up outdoors.
Nothing hardcore, but if you are the type that likes "unobstructed views", there are a lot of those.
Sorry, but I can't just bullet point this one. There's somehow more to it. As a frame of refgerence, my taste is for well done images.
This site has an ambiance about it that is somehow different from the the other, mostly european softcore sites. One of the fun things is looking at how the girls are transformed from the initial Audtion shoot. When they come in, they are good looking and trim. For the shoots, most are OMFG awesome! Now, it takes a good model to make this formula work. A good recent example of this is Amber Sym. In the audtion shots, she is hot, with a well toned, cheerleader type body. In the photo sets, she is simply ungodly beautiful.
Many models shoot stills well, but are really awkward in videos. The folks at DD (I still want to call it DDG) really know how to shoot video to bring out the grace and beauty in a girl. There are dozens of examples like this.
Another thing this site does is understand what the typical male, um, comes here for. I think the word I would use to describe these types of sets is Inviting. The models are aware of the photographer and use that element to tease or play with the camera a little in a very subtle way. Imagine if a really hot girl said to you "Hey, I'm going to take my clothes off and maybe fool around with myself a little. Stick around and watch if you want because that makes it more interesting for me." It is subtly different from how the European sites do it. "Flirt" sets even have th egirls talking at you...but sometimes less is more. Very good directing on the photography team's part.
Most of the sets include an ample number of really nicely (as in tastefully) done close-ups. And sometimes there is a tiny bit of Astroglide..I guess..in the right place to make things more interesting. It seems somehow more personal...sharing...inviting than the "girl frolicking in the woods" shoots you see elsewhere.
Another subtle thing that makse the experiance nicer is that there is very little cross selling or other advertising going on. This is a freestanding site, so you get what you get. It just seems so much more respectful of my time and privacy to NOT be mentioning that there are also sets of this girl on the blah-blah-blah sister site. (Compared to, say, Met-Art, that accosts you with ads for sister sites.) I guess the reason they don't have more cross-selling is because nobody else does some things the same way that they do. Kudoos for both.
Once a set appears (or re-appears) they are placed into specific categories that you can browse through. Categories include Dreamgirls, XXX Stars, Young and Fresh, Flashback, Interviews, etc. This helps if you are searching for a particular look or Genre, but it appears that they are not producing a lot of new material for many of these categories.
Now that you can tell that I'm clearly enamored with the models and photography, let me tell you a few of the more frustraing things about this site.
It is slooooow, mostly slow for pages to load. Downloads seem to be about average in speed. Not sure what that is about.
As I mentioned above, many of the older sets get recycled, apparently more than once. I don't have a major issue with that as many sites do it, but this site passes them off as new every time they come back around (sometimes multiple times). Fricking QUIT THAT! Introduce them in a different category and include the original dates for the shoots as well as the original dates for the models introduction to the site. Yes, some of the sets are the best they've ever done and deserve to be re-introduced (take a look at Alyssa Lovelace, for example), but re-datestamping them is just plain wrong. It destroys the model timelines and, at best, seems deceptive.
And here's another thing. As I looked back through my 12+ year collection of DDG/DD images, I noticed that a lot of material from the late 1990s and early 2000s is no longer there. Some of it is big-hair and bushy, but a lot of it is completely timeless. You should consider putting more of the images back on the site in the appropiate area so your subscribers can enjoy them.
Ok, bottom line. If you are into softcore, this is absolutely, positively one of the sites to visit as there is over a decade's worth of material. If you were here less than a year ago, there is not much new content, but it might be worth it to visit for the new lower price.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
12-01-1202:09am (Update History) Reason: Ran into another con.
Pros:
-2000x3000 resolution on latest photo sets
-Around 720 of those photosets are 3000px.
-Around 540 720p videos
-Interview videos
-updates once a day video every 5th update.
-Low price
Cons:
-Older sets 1600x1024 or under.
-Around 1900 of the photosets are 1600px or under.
-Around 500 videos are 420p.
-Videos have music.
-Majority of pictures are in the outdoors with natural lighting which I'm not a fan of but is personal taste
-Video links expire when using download manager. Makes downloading videos exponentially time consuming.
Bottom Line:
Based on the latest 3000px photos, technically the photo sets are well shot and composed. Personally I'm not a fan of the lighting. Most photosets are outdoors and most of the indoor sets have natural lighting from outside through the window. This might be a plus for some but for me it is not my style. I prefer the controlled lighting and indoor scenes.
Based on the latest 720p videos, the videos have a hazy dream sequence look to them. The videos have a music track to them. Both of which are not my style. Aside from that there are interviews with some of the models which are always a plus.
Search is done by broad categories hair color, breast type, shaved/unshaved, styles(wet,girlfriends, backstage, xxx stars etc). You can organize sets by publishing date or rating. There is also a checkbox for hd only so you only see 720p videos.
The models are more playboyesque type of models and they are photographed in that style. If you are looking for this style then this site is worth a try for the price offered. If you are looking for the amateur girl next door style this is not it. Whether or not you like this site depends on what style you like.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very cheap monthly fees.
- Tons of classic porn.
- Well known movies, they are generally films with big name stars.
- Have some films grouped by company or regions (French porn form the 1970s for example)
- Can search catalog by year.
- Fairly well managed database of stars, directors, year the film was made, and company that made them. It could be a little better, but this is probably the one thing they do right at this site.
- You also get access to a lot of Gay movies, all classics. Some really great porn mustaches.
Cons:
- One of the worst site designs. Very clunky.
- They decided to put their Facebook and Google+ links right above the download links, so you are constantly have to close popups because they are activate by "mouse overs" whenever you try to click on the download links. This is probably the most annoying thing at their site.
- Half their movies are clipped into smaller files, the other half are just whole downloads. There is no consistency to this either, well except that if they clipped it everything just gets named ipod3g_##, so you constantly have to rename every clip you download (or end up with ipod3g_01 through ipod3g_100).
- They advertise films that are supposedly going to be offered soon, but often they never do (they get skipped over, can't be offered after all; I really don't know why).
- Quality is really hit or miss here. The year of the film doesn't really seem to affect this. Old and newer films are often very poor quality.
- No choice of downloads.
Bottom Line:
This is a great site if you are looking for a cheap alternative to buying classic porn DVDs or more likely VHS in a lot of these cases. They have a ton of films here, but you may not always find the biggest ones here (or anywhere else for that matter). For example, they have a ton of Christy Canyon's movies, but only one Traci Lords. However, the quality of many of these movies is sub-par just from their origins in time, but at the same time the operators of this website really need to establish some degree of consistency. Occasionally they will post a movie that is almost unwatchable. One of the most annoying things, aside from their poor placement of Facebook links, are how badly they can mess a movie up clipping it. Having to rename half your downloads from this site is something I haven't had to deal with since the 1990s. They took the time to clip it, you are paying them to do so whether you wanted them to or not, the least they could do is title their videos properly. This little faux pas just makes them look as amateurish as their 1960s movies (of which there are only a handful). It is clear that they are just uploading films with no regard towards their customer's satisfaction.
My problem with this site is that after some time (1-2 months)you have probably downloaded everything you want to keep. So, you are enticed into staying because they have a movie you have been searching for "coming soon." Hopefully they actually offer it, but oftentimes the film just disappears out of the "coming soon" list. Then you add to it all the little annoyances like having to close the popups when you accidentally mouse over them, renaming your downloads, and all of this so that maybe you can get a movie or two that you actually want per week. After a few months I found myself going for days and days without downloading from this site. It really ticks you off when the download links don't work for the first few days they offer the movie too, which has happened about every third movie they upload it seems.
The bottom line is that if you are looking for a site with a ton of classic porn, then this is probably the only one worth trying. I recommend it as a one time, one month membership. Get in there and get what you want and get out. They don't seem to care about the problems with their site (post suggestions all you want via their "suggestion box," I am pretty sure nobody reads them). The quality is hit or miss, and you won't really know until you download it. And like many sites these days, if you are using a Download manager you will have about thirty minutes before you will have to refresh the links. Fortunately their largest file sizes are still less than 500mb, so this is only a problem if you are trying to download half a decade worth of movies at a time. They are a good source for classic porn, but until they start addressing some of these issues I wouldn't recommend any long term memberships with them. The only reason they score a 70 is because they do have an impressive catalog, but that is about all they have going for them. What is sad is that their most impressive aspect has nothing to do with the site itself, just the access it provides to all those movies. There biggest problems are horrible mistakes made by web designers and management. As soon as any other company comes along offering this niche, this site will get trounced into oblivion. I have personally emailed Videobox requesting that they at least create an additional, retro site. I would rather pay Videobox and extra $15/mo than to keep paying these guys.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
