|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
messmer (0)
|
| 2151-2200 of 2588 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 26 | 32 | 43 | Page 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | Next Page > |
| 08-08-09 07:49am - 5616 days | #21 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Oops, yes, I meant GB rather than Meg! :-) | |
|
||
| 08-07-09 06:41pm - 5616 days | #15 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks for the tip badandy. I certainly will format the hard drive, have to because I want to get it ready for TrueCrypt, and I'm keeping my fingers crossed when it comes to quality and possible crashes. I already have two 500 meg MyBook hard drives by ?Western Digital? that are full now and I haven't had any problems with them...yet. Let's hope their 1 TB version will be just as reliable. | |
|
||
| 08-07-09 06:37pm - 5616 days | #14 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I don't know most of your porn stars but laud your taste, leggy brunettes wearing nylons do it for me too! :-) | |
|
||
| 08-07-09 06:34pm - 5616 days | #13 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Well, that seems to me to be as good a motivation as any!:-) And until yesterday I didn't have a favorite either. That girl brings back my youth, except that in my youth no girl I knew acted like her and if there had been one I probably would have been too shy to take advantage of it! | |
|
||
| 08-07-09 01:43pm - 5617 days | #9 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I like your projecting, better that than too much cynicism, Drooler | |
|
||
| 08-07-09 01:36pm - 5617 days | #8 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Well, I completely agree with you when it comes to the women we meet in real life. I was thinking of the ladies in porn. Vulnerability and personality seldom play a part. Should see the things my new-found favorite porn star does!! Vulnerable she isn't! :-) | |
|
||
| 08-07-09 01:33pm - 5617 days | #7 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Shish, try to look a bit deeper and you're called a nut case, unless (more likely) you are referring to badandy, in which case I agree! :-) Hey, badandy, guess what? I've just ordered a 1 TB external hard drive, I'm going to catch up with you yet. And, yes, we all greatly admire your wisdom, knowledge and wit, lk2fireone, but, tell the truth sometimes I wonder if it isn't a misplaced sort of admiration. How can you truly admire and follow someone who has a kitten as an avatar? That is so .. so .. not alpha male! | |
|
||
| 08-07-09 10:28am - 5617 days | #3 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I suggest you come with me to my appointment with Exotics! Maybe he can figure things out for both of us! :-) | |
|
||
| 08-07-09 08:59am - 5617 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I never did have a favorite porn star - until now! Just discovered one whose videos will be chased down by me all over the DVD place. Her name is Claire Robbins and the reason she touched that special chord is because she looks exactly like my first crush when I was fourteen-ish! :-) Which brings me to the obvious question: Is there anyone else who associates their liking for a star with someone from their past or maybe even the present. I could never understand the pre-occupation with and adulation of certain stars (after all most acting is atrocious and most look like so many of the others, so why single out a particular one) but my experience would explain "why" we like certain things about stars, and porn in general. And why we keep looking. Is it the past (erotic feelings in connection with someone or certain erotically charged situations) that makes us go wow rather than the quality of a video or the beauty of a model? Don't mind me, just wondering about my reaction. | |
|
||
| 08-06-09 03:01pm - 5618 days | #26 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I second that nomination! | |
|
||
| 08-06-09 02:57pm - 5618 days | #30 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, Toadsith! I had my settings on "all," once I clicked on "simple" I was able to follow your directions and all is now well. Thanks loads. As to your other recommendations re. stuttering HD videos, I followed your advice but the darn videos still stutter in the VLC Player, WMP works fine but I find VLC so much better that I hate to use WMP. I like the snapshot feature (obviously) but, even more important, I like the idea that one can sharpen the videos. Most need it and I have VLC set to automatically make them "crisper" by a notch. Now why doesn't Microsoft think of incorporating that into their player? | |
|
||
| 08-06-09 11:37am - 5618 days | #28 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I just got the latest version of the VLC Player (5.0.1) and can't find the settings for snapshots (or how to modify the defaults.) I previously had it set to save snapshots in jpg format and in a folder/directory different from the default one. Can someone who has the latest version help me find the right spot to make the changes. Probably staring me right in the face! PS. Just came to mind: VLC stutters badly when I play the 8000 bitrate HD files I downloaded from In The Crack and FTV and I always have to switch to the Windows Media Player to play those files. I do have a quad core chip and more memory than I'll ever need. Any ideas? Solutions? Thanks again. Edited on Aug 06, 2009, 11:43am | |
|
||
| 07-31-09 09:49am - 5624 days | #23 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I appreciate your honesty, Pink Panther, I possess your level of expertise and it's good to know there's someone else out there who's just as handicapped tek-wise! :-) Edited on Jul 31, 2009, 03:05pm | |
|
||
| 07-31-09 09:38am - 5624 days | #23 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I wouldn't either. First time I subscribed I went by the updates because I found some of the models breathtakingly beautiful (they're happily resting on my hard drive) but the present updates appear to be indeed only so-so, with some exceptions. Same as I found that the latest Nubiles updates aren't quite as nubile as they used to be ... which is another story. Thanks for confirming that it's not just a question of becoming jaded! :-) | |
|
||
| 07-31-09 09:32am - 5624 days | #9 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, guys, for your varied responses. Some made me laugh, some made me cry (figuratively speaking) when I realized how old I was getting. Pantyhose = Vintage? Man, to me they were invented only yesterday. Another thing that really surprised me, reading between the lines, is that lingerie is often seen as something that gets in the way of the action. It's that generation gap again. For me, Lingerie enhances, it excites, it teases .. it's an absolutely necessary element when it comes to porn. Hooray for Victoria's secret and slinky teddies etc. when they stick to their original formula rather than attempting to make their lingerie look like Calvin Klein's. Thanks for participating, guys. I did have fun reading the replies, it's a wild, wonderful, diverse world out there that much is obvious. Doesn't help me with getting more teasing back into porn but I appreciate your thoughts! :-) | |
|
||
| 07-30-09 07:44pm - 5624 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
.... about nothing but maybe of help to webmasters (and me): Does any Porn User find pantyhose (tights) sexy? It is my personal, stubbornly held belief that the invention of pantyhose ruined eroticism as we knew it. :-) Why the question? Well, I am very interested in subscribing to a site that caters to folks like me who drool over women who are clad in lingerie from the fifties, sixties and seventies, the sexiest lingerie ever, but find to my astonishment that they also offer a bonus site for pantyhose lovers which, to me, is the very antithesis of erotic in its bland practicality (not the site, the pantyhose.) Now don't be afraid to come back at me with an honest answer. I'd really be interested to see if there is a sizable percentage of porn lovers who not only learned to accept pantyhose but actually find it erotic. And while I'm at it, does anyone really prefer cotton to nylon and silk and satin? Women may sit this one out because I am sure they prefer the comfortable to the sexy in their everyday lives, but what about men? Do you prefer cotton on your women? Honestly? You know what I'm doing here, don't you? Hope springs eternal in the human breast, so I hope the overwhelming majority of you will be with me in connection with this topic and that webmasters and owners will look in, sit up and take notice, and create more sites that appeal to me! :-) One can always try! And didn't we talk about this subject before? If so, forgive me. | |
|
||
| 07-30-09 04:07pm - 5625 days | #21 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Strange you should mention Vintage Flash because I just put it under "favorites" to remind myself when it's time to subscribe to my next site. But my taste is actually more eclectic than that. I have subscribed to a few on your wish list like: Anilos, Nubiles, In The Crack and have enjoyed them as well, despite the fact that Anilos was the only one fitting my preferred niche. Have a quick look at their recent updates and confirm for me that, in their case as well, the models aren't as hot as they used to be! If you don't agree with me then I'll know it's a question of getting jaded. :-) Karup's Older Women is another site that I've been tempted to subscribe to, but I noticed through sample sets of theirs, offered by All Over Thirty as a bonus, that their picture sets are not that exciting. At least not for me. | |
|
||
| 07-29-09 07:16pm - 5625 days | #19 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Hi GCode, thanks for asking! :-) I haven't been doing too well. New sites of interest that show up occasionally don't have enough contents yet to please me, old sites I discover that might appeal to my taste have either low quality contents because they stopped updating some time ago or, if I return to a familiar one, don't give me the same "kick" I got out of them originally. I am currently subscribing to All Over 30 again because I had great hopes when it comes to their videos, after they announced that all material shot after May xx? was in High Resolution or in the case of videos in High Definition, but all updates for the past three days have been in the old format when it comes to videos. They must have a huge amount of older material that they release over a period of time so until they use that up, good quality videos are hard to find on their site. Then I also returned to Videosz and found that the complaints that their DVDs were lacking excitement and were too much the same lately were justified. It seems that the whole Porn world has gone anal and oral and every update seems the same with only the faces changing. A sad tale of woe. There were two sites that tempted me, because they were different ... they were both Japanese and I like their story lines and their acting. I find that Japanese actresses are much more demure and give delicious (more restrained, mock-reluctant) performances, much more time is also spent on foreplay and getting undressed than in North American Porn, HOWEVER, I don't think I'll ever get past those d.....d pixels hiding their naughty bits. :-) I've tried, I've really tried but it's a major turn off for me. And there it stands .. sob ... Please send me your list, post haste, maybe there are some sites I've overlooked! :-) Sorry for being so long winded but you did ask!! | |
|
||
| 07-28-09 02:08pm - 5627 days | #17 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Welcome to the forum and PU in general, BabyGetReal! You've brought up a very important point when it comes to Porn. I watched a main stream romantic comedy the other day that had a couple of fairly "daring" sex scenes and found myself more turned on then I have been with much of the stuff I've downloaded from Video Sites lately. It does make a huge difference if the mood is set first, with some affection, tenderness, foreplay etc., before the director switches to the actual sex scenes. I am also craving scenes where, upon completion of the sex act, there is some embracing and caressing. I don't think too many would agree with us because most, if given the chance, will edit all the meaningful stuff, the stuff that gives a scene context, just to get to the "money shot" quicker. The only thing I would disagree with, when it comes to your taste, is your rejection of "slut" (and I assume other similar terms). Sometimes couples enjoy playing "dirty" and that's all right as long as the afterplay is (appears) tender and loving. | |
|
||
| 07-23-09 03:22pm - 5632 days | #3 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, Drooler, I never paid attention to (or noticed) the two differing rates. Seeing that I'm mostly using CCBill and Epoch anyway I'll probably be all right then if I pick non-recurring. At least I hope so, in the case of Epoch! | |
|
||
| 07-23-09 02:52pm - 5632 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I never noticed this before but there are sites that quote the subscription price as being: One month, $29.95 recurring, $35.95 non-recurring. Do they exact a penalty if you subscribe to the former and then cancel within that month? Thanks. Edited on Jul 23, 2009, 03:23pm | |
|
||
| 07-22-09 02:49pm - 5633 days | #25 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
In this case my taste is just the opposite of yours. I love the story tellers. Newhart, Borge, Wilson, were some of my favorites. I know that dates me! :-) I also loved comedians like Richard Pryor, George Carlin etc. on G rated shows but disliked them on R-rated cable. Strangely enough, seeing that I'm a porn lover, I don't like x-rated language in my comedians. | |
|
||
| 07-22-09 08:56am - 5633 days | #20 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
No one mentioned Seinfeld. My opinion? His show was great but as a stand up comedian he isn't so hot! | |
|
||
| 07-18-09 07:38pm - 5636 days | #32 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
lk2fireone, it is Angelina Jolie! I like her a lot but am not really a dyed-in-the-wool fan of hers. I was just looking for an avatar that had a woman wearing something nice and clingy and came across hers. I am still looking for the avatar that best expresses my taste. And that one would definitely have nylons and garter belt in it! And full cut panties! | |
|
||
| 07-18-09 12:57pm - 5637 days | #30 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Hi WeeWillyWinky, would you believe this is the first time I come across this post of yours. Don't know how I could have missed it! In any case I am very glad that you are back. I sent you an email through PU recently to let you know how delighted I was that you had re-activated your account, but had no idea you had posted again in the forum. And I am so glad that I once again have someone whose tastes are very close to mine and hope to see some of your reviews again real soon! I'm running out of ideas! And don't worry about the times our tastes should part ways. I, and my wallet, can handle it if I should find that we're not on the same wave length the odd time that happens. :-) | |
|
||
| 06-26-09 11:46am - 5659 days | #12 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Well, I am glad that Farrah gets a bit of time and recognition in this forum. As far as the media are concerned there was only one story yesterday and that was Michael Jackson. | |
|
||
| 06-26-09 11:43am - 5659 days | #26 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Welcome to this forum, Sue_ann, and I am delighted you burst that distasteful bubble. Abby Winters was my very first review and I've rejoined the site at various times over the years so I am happy to learn that the raid was relatively benign. I would have been very disappointed in my friends from Oz if it had been any other way. | |
|
||
| 06-26-09 11:39am - 5659 days | #25 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Don't be too hard on yourself, Jay G. It was easy to react negatively to the newspaper article which is reality. If you are paranoid then so am I. :-) | |
|
||
| 06-25-09 11:56am - 5660 days | #15 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I read only recently, can't remember where exactly, that those on top of the food chain cannot tolerate anything that is not under their control and that this holds true even in democratic and "free" countries. I'm starting to believe it. | |
|
||
| 06-25-09 11:52am - 5660 days | #14 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
You said it, mbaya. My sentiments exactly! | |
|
||
| 06-24-09 01:33pm - 5661 days | #59 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Oh, that we (Canada) had a country full of wittyguys instead of all those polite, naive, passive folks that think that everything their Government does MUST be for their own good! I'm not crazy about unrestrained individualism but when it comes to basic freedoms, like the freedom of speech, we tend to be too complacent. Eh? | |
|
||
| 06-24-09 12:00pm - 5661 days | #8 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Stories like this always give me the very uncomfortable feeling that we've been living in the "Wild West" period of the Internet and that it won't be long now before the folks on top will take measures to re-establish some form of control over our electronic lives. I still remember the frantic efforts by customs and the Post Office to keep the "filth" originating down south out of pristine Canada and the resentment I felt that someone's view of what's "proper" should be able to control mine, so the Internet was (and is at the moment) like a breath of fresh air to me. Having been born and raised in Europe I could never understand that sex was so controversial on this continent while violence was freely shown on Canadian and American Television on a daily basis. Someone's values are slightly twisted, and I don't think they are mine. To add to my unease, our Government in Canada is, at this very moment, talking about introducing a bill that would make it mandatory for every ISP to have to install equipment that would keep track of every move a user makes on the Internet, this even includes e-mail! The official reason given is that a tool is needed to hunt down pedophiles and terrorists. Scarier yet is the fact that no warrant would be needed to check the activities of an individual except some vague suspicion on the part of the police that he might be up to no good. The sheeple are already muttering: "Nothing wrong with a law like this if you are not doing anything wrong!" giving me fits of despair that they seem to be unable to see that some of the freedoms we have gained are gradually being taken back. I hope to hear loud protests from the opposing parties that, at the moment, are propping up our minority government once the proposed bill is being debated. If not I'll give up voting for good. P.S. I just stopped my subscription to Abby Winters a month ago. I wonder if the present subscribers will end up on someone's data base as "known perverts?" AW, for Pete's sake, one of the cleanest sites around. Go figure! Edited on Jun 24, 2009, 12:05pm | |
|
||
| 06-16-09 06:55pm - 5668 days | #18 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Interesting, exotics4me. I didn't know that male performers in California have to use condoms by law. Who is making all those DVDs containing unprotected sex then. I thought most of them originated in California. | |
|
||
| 06-16-09 06:53pm - 5668 days | #17 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
:-) That must be the reason, why I too keep going back to solo girl material. Must go and subscribe to a site that is mostly solo or g/g. It's been a while. | |
|
||
| 06-13-09 02:49pm - 5672 days | #10 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I agree with your admiration for Dr. Sharon Mitchell, Pink Panther. I learned quite a bit today by following some of the links provided. Thanks everyone for your response. I was more than a bit disturbed when I first saw the headline because I had assumed that the controls were quite stringent and that the industry was quite safe for most performers. As someone who dislikes scenes featuring condoms I also felt more than a little guilty for enjoying them. :-( | |
|
||
| 06-13-09 02:26pm - 5672 days | #9 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks for that link, atrapat. Doesn't sound quite as bad as the media made it out to be. | |
|
||
| 06-13-09 01:16pm - 5672 days | #7 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I sure hope that one performer wasn't a male because that pool of "actors" is pretty small and he could have infected many women especially in all those scenes where anal, unprotected sex is featured. | |
|
||
| 06-12-09 08:01pm - 5672 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Just saw that sad news scrolling on the bottom of a news cast. Does anyone know who it might be? It didn't mention a name, nor if the star was male of female. This could cause quite the uproar in porn valley. | |
|
||
| 06-06-09 06:49pm - 5678 days | #12 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks turboshaft. I am embarrassed and realize that I'm really getting older because I forgot that we had a discussion on bitrates and that I had started it! :-) I have always had a bad memory so I can at least relax about Alzheimer's for now. One more question directed to the whole group of fine gentlemen: Still talking DVD sites, not HD ones. Of all the sites you subscribed to which one did the best job of converting DVDs to a good to excellent picture at full screen? | |
|
||
| 06-06-09 06:33pm - 5678 days | #11 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks guys for all the good advice. I tried the mouse over the icon bit and got the size of the file (so and so many mbs)as well as the length, eg. 26 minutes, but not the dimensions. I tried pretty well everything until I found out to my delight that Raging Buddhist's suggestion worked. He may have Windows 2000 but it works in Vista as well. Right click on the file, go to properties, then to details and there it is: Frame width, frame height, total bitrate! And badandy, your suggestion worked perfectly for me when I still had xp but as you said Vista is retarded (Can't wait for the new OS to come out in November) and while I could get it to display some information it never gave me anything under details or dimensions. Again, thanks all! | |
|
||
| 06-06-09 01:47pm - 5679 days | #33 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Strange you should mention remakes. I just watched "The Story Of O" the other day (for the umpteenth time)and, as always was wishing someone would remake it but with great caution and care. Keep the story as is, just use better cameras and lighting. Now that would be a keeper! | |
|
||
| 06-06-09 01:41pm - 5679 days | #5 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Hey Jay G, I'm glad I'm not alone! And I agree with your observations. I've been downloading files, all with a 4000 total bitrate, yet the quality is very uneven. Some videos are reasonably clear as long as I don't use full screen, others are the pits. Bit rates are indeed not everything. My Anilos videos run at 3500 and are like HD, the ones I downloaded from a DVD place (even the best) at 4000 are terrible by comparison. | |
|
||
| 06-06-09 01:36pm - 5679 days | #4 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, mbaya, that would be a very convenient way of finding out. Must try it out right after I finish writing this! :-) | |
|
||
| 06-06-09 09:36am - 5679 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Can anyone tell me how they determine the size of a video. I know that I'm exposing myself as a dummy but while I can get the total bitrate through Vista I have not yet found a category that would list the dimensions of a video, e.g. 720x480! It is important information in connection with a review but I don't know how to go about getting that information. Would there be a setting on your Player that allows you to determine what's what? Argh, I hate to look like an ignoramus when it comes to technical details. :-( | |
|
||
| 06-03-09 06:42pm - 5681 days | #4 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Didn't we have a guy in BC who challenged the ruling that written kiddie porn was illegal, pat? I think a higher court agreed with him because no harm was done to any actual persons but that particular ruling might have been reversed as well in the meantime. | |
|
||
| 06-03-09 06:37pm - 5681 days | #24 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I think you got me mixed up with Wittyguy, pat. I do plead guilty to the nutcase part, though. And I like it that way, it's a lot more fun than being sane! And btw. re. brangelina, that's a desperation avatar and not a sign of my devotion to her. If anyone finds me a mature woman with nice clingy silky lingerie I'll use that one ... I had better stop before I get myself too worked up. LOL. Nice work Wittyguy! | |
|
||
| 06-03-09 09:19am - 5682 days | #17 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, Denner. I missed you in the short run! :-) | |
|
||
| 06-02-09 07:56pm - 5682 days | #14 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Aha .. maybe that's the answer. Without women no one has to try to be the alpha male and that keeps things civilized! :-) Just kidding, just kidding. | |
|
||
| 06-02-09 07:53pm - 5682 days | #15 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Yep, I think it will be a reasonable personal rule to stick by, PinkPanther. I am currently subscribed to a site I was highly enthused about at first but now I am finding hidden flaws that were not readily apparent during the first week or so and they would definitely knock the site down by at least five points. And I'm with you when it comes to making our method a general rule. May each do it in his own way. | |
|
||
| 06-02-09 06:27pm - 5682 days | #40 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I had the same problem with a webmaster recently who refused to zip his pictures for fear of piracy. But non-zipped picture sets are not half as bad as un-downloadable videos, so, no way would I subscribe to a streaming only site, even if it was full of lingerie loving MILFs in their fifties, which happens to be my favorite niche. :-) The WM is plain wrong in his predictions: streaming only is a sure fire way to Porn site obscurity and eventual death for lack of subscribers. | |
|
||
| 2151-2200 of 2588 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 26 | 32 | 43 | Page 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | Next Page > |
|
