|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
Drooler (0)
|
| 1751-1800 of 1831 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 27 | 35 | Page 36 | 37 | Next Page > |
| 05-23-08 12:55am - 6057 days | #16 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Oh, I know that spit is harmless. But getting back to the point of the thread, I don't like the way it's used sometimes in porn, such as I've described. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-22-08 12:40pm - 6058 days | #13 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Makes for an interesting question: Which is more disgusting, that scene in The Fly or one of those close-up shots, as at Ass Traffic, of a guy's spit seeping down from the rim of a girls fully flared corn hole? Tough call. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-21-08 05:55pm - 6059 days | #6 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Well, Denner, if you've never been, you might want to give it a try sometime. For one thing, the newer video quality is really good, and for pics, the ones that go up to 3290px or so begin in Dec. 06 or maybe even earlier. And they're really good quality. I'll have to add Mia Moore (aka Nikki Nine) to my list of favorites -- she's really beautiful! -- and there are more. You know I'm not a vid fan for softcore, but I did check out one of blond Zoe there (one of the finest women I've ever laid eyes on), and it was nice! It was of a photoshoot, but the mood was positive and she had a lot of appeal. I don't know how they do billing for y'all in Europe, but if it's in dollars, now's a good time. Somehow, I think you'll join. You seem interested. My bet is that you'll like it. And at 1byday, today's reissued set of Sandy (the "Hungarian Queen," I call her) was, well, more like it! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on May 21, 2008, 06:01pm | |
|
||
| 05-21-08 05:29pm - 6059 days | #4 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
No, not mine. I love dogs, but the one in the picture was simply the best droolin' dog shot I could find, and I'd looked through several, gauging both photo quality and the visibility of drool. I made mine the maximum size allowed, 100 square. It works pretty nicely with the color scheme here at PU, too. It was a lucky find. I didn't want a photo of a person drooling, or only of drool hanging out of someone's mouth. That's disgusting. It's natural for a dog to drool. And they're animals. Sometimes when I look at porn, I feel like one myself. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-21-08 12:57pm - 6059 days | #4 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
One more thing I'll say in favor of ALS Scans is this: When they reissue a photoset in larger sizes, they include all of the original issue shots and usually more on top of that. I wish I could say the same for 1byday, but they've dropped some really choice ass shots in some of their reissued material. I don't understand why they do this, and maybe there's a good reason, but it's frustrating when that lovely shot that was originally in 938x631 is gone from the newly released 2000px version. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on May 21, 2008, 01:14pm | |
|
||
| 05-21-08 12:55pm - 6059 days | #3 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
ALS Scans has made quality improvements and is reissuing old content in better sizes and video qualities on a gradual basis. The blog by Alex is also a good read. I read it at least once quickly every time there's a new post. It's how I learned first-hand that Sarah Blake and (earlier) Nella got boob jobs. He also posts extra photos from older or newer shoots or even shoots to come, which I snatch up like a pidgeon at a train station. But as you know, I'm an ass man first and foremost. I love the pics I've gotten of some of the models such as Zuzana Zeleznovova, Isabella Sky, and Gitta Blond. I'm also really looking foward to the reissue of the Sophie Moone 2002 shoot, among others. These are pics with the girl's buns squarely on display with her looking back (or at least her sexy face is visible), and there's no cropping away except below the upper thigh. I do wish that more pics of that sort would be in the photoshoots. There are lots of shoots with hundreds of pics and not one that matches what I've described. I think they're more a matter of happy accident when they do show up rather than intentional omission when they don't. That's because the everyday special there is female genitalia, which is treated as a kind of plaything. Bottles, produce, specula, and clip-on metal thingies are among the accessories. Pussy lips can be stretched quite a bit! I'm reminded of this toy in the late 1970's called "Stretch Armstrong," a brawny blond male with arms and legs that could be stretched to incredible lengths. Most of the girls on ALS are very beautiful, and I do appreciate the ALS policy of all-natural breasts, though their acceptance of girls with excessive tatoos puts a definite damper on the "all-natural" concept. Whether all of the the pussy playtime is natural or not is, I suppose, in the eye of the beholder. But once I've downloaded a photoset, having spotted the too-rare choice ass shots, I control-click every photo in which I can spot a speculum, Rocket, or cucumber, and into the trash they go. It's just not my thing. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on May 21, 2008, 01:00pm | |
|
||
| 05-21-08 02:17am - 6059 days | #13 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
What I'm about to say might strike one as very cynical, but I've lived through enough to know that it is possible: that the religious conversion text that we've been discussing wasn't even penned by Erica at all. It could have been written by someone else for the purpose that you describe, with or without Erica's knowledge. Or it could be for real. We really don't know for sure. There are wheels within wheels, and what we can't see is just as important as what we are shown. I just think we should take it all with a grain of salt (or a statue of salt? ;) until we see what transpires over the next few weeks or even months. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-19-08 07:41pm - 6061 days | #10 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Yes, I agree that lubricant, the kind sold by your friendly adult sexual aid shop, would definitely be better. After all, it was intended to pave the pathways of pleasure. Spit contains enzymes for breaking down food, so it's not the best choice. I really don't like it when the guy pauses from fucking and takes his time drooling a big spitteroo on the girl's snatch or into her anus. It's like we're supposed see that and go, "Oh, wow! Awesome!" or something. I say just apply the freakin' lube if you need it and cut that part out during the edit. And as far as spitting in the girl's face is concerned, that's just mean. The world can be a pretty nasty place sometimes. To me, porn is an escape from that. Of course, not everyone wants their porn to be all nice and dovey. Yeah, some like it with a mean streak -- but they're twisted fucks, IMHO. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on May 19, 2008, 08:24pm | |
|
||
| 05-14-08 11:30am - 6066 days | #16 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I was told about the starving children in Korea, but not about the E European women. When I started seeing more and more of them in porn, after my initial and very pleasing Jana Cova introduction, I thought, "The men there have it so good! They must really prize these girls!" I tend to think of Eastern European girls as having the finest gene pool for beautiful ass on the planet. (I think we've had that discussion, too.) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-13-08 02:13pm - 6067 days | #12 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I actually sought out reviewers that I felt I could trust, and made sure that they knew it was me. Some of them returned the favor. (And it worked the other way around, too.) So, Denner, it's time to get schmoozin'! I'll bet you'll have that 30 and your final badge in no time! Good luck! And about negatives, over the past year or longer I've had several, always from "anonymous," which mysteriously came and later disappeared. I was like, "Oh." And then later, "Wha- ? Tsh! Whatever." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-12-08 11:31pm - 6067 days | #12 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Yes, I think we've had this kind of conversation before. And perhaps some porn consumers have that attitude that everything must be "Anglicized" or "Americanized" (in a very narrow, "white" preconception that misses the enormous contributions of everyone else). Pier999 is one of those sites that gives phony, American-sounding names to Eastern Europeans: Rita Barrett, Sandra Lane, Sally Walker, Becky Milar, Andrea Randall, Rachel Linton, Diane Moore, Candy Hunter, Marie Sheridan, Tonya Tyler, Patty Gower (for Marina/Euphrat), Veronica Drake, Zoe Saint, etc. (And in all fairness, there are also some such as Teresa Ilova, Marketa Brymova, and Mariana Pokova.) Do we really need to have our porn spoon-fed to us like this? Mariana Pokova -- that's Lenka Horokova! How's about Aneta Smrhova? Marketa Belonoha? Zsanett Égerházy? Ohhh, scary, foreign-sounding names! It's distracting! Damn if I didn't lose my (note the name) Johnson! I'm outta here! Maybe there is a language barrier, but where, precisely, is it? I submit that resistance to the girl's real names (should they wish to actually use them), or pseudonyms from their own languages, and to their speaking their own languages, is at least half of it. I see no trouble enjoying the interview videos from VirtuaGirlHD with the girls speaking in their native tongues. That's seeing them more of how they really are. (Of course, the English subtitles were necessary. I'm a long way off from my rank beginner status in Hungarian and Czech.) I even once found (and have kept) a hot, unsubtitled hardcore video of Lucie Horinkova that was all in Czech. So does she really have to be homogenized into "Victorie Kay?" We're interested in beauty and sex here, right? Would it really matter if the girl was screaming "bassza meg!" I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-10-08 05:30am - 6070 days | #2 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Here's something that I just don't agree with at all, and I've seen such complaints before. I don't find the Eastern European women to be categorically any more or less "emotionless" than any other regionally defined group. There's plenty of passion and pleasure in videos and photosets I have of Mia Stone, Julie Silver, Marina/Euphrat, Sophie Paris, Lucy Lee, Mili Jay, etc. etc. etc. Nor do I see them as "taking over the porn business." They have grabbed quite a share of the market, and that's been for nothing but the better. But the women of the Americas, for example, will always have a good share of it, too, which pleases me just as much. Don't you see that it's a rank oversimplication to say that Eastern European women are emotionless and interested only in the money? It isn't like the female half of society turns into icy little robots, programmed with Quicken, once one moves, say, east of the Rhine. Spin the globe, stop, point to an area: Of course, they're ALL in it for the money! And they'll make less if they lack the sex appeal, which of course is more a matter of getting a feeling across than it is of looks. Over the years, I've gotten to know women from this part of world myself, from Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland, Russia, Romania, Bulgaria, the Baltics, the Balkans, and so on, and it's like the old saying goes, "It takes all kinds." Sweet girls, flirty girls, cold girls, scheming girls, neurotic girls, psycho girls, etc. Remind you of any place familiar? So I've been quite surprised at this notion about what is a really diverse group of women, and wonder what could possibly explain it. But I doubt that the tide is going to turn back. Reason? These girls are popular! If they weren't, the number of sites that feature them would dwindle, and that sure as hell isn't happening. Count me among those who lack the sensibility to have developed a bias against Eastern European women in porn. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-08-08 12:52pm - 6072 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
This thread is on a very positive note. Tell us about the best stuff you've found, in your opinion and according to your tastes, in your search for porn -- the stuff that really hit the "sweet spot." For me, a total ass fanatic, just a few of the best finds in photosets include: Evelyn Lory "Verdezza" at evelyn.glam0ur.com; "Xarian" and "Gratian" at MetArt Vendula "tdreams_10899" at TeenDreams (They don't name the galleries and the sequence numbers change as they add new ones. She starts off in black lingerie.) Mia Stone "Psychedelic Chicken in the Kitchen" at Eve Angel's site. Nikky Case "Fabulous" at MetArt (Starts with her at an ironing board -- waaaay sexy!); no title at a marble pillar indoors at topmiss (a French language site that's been rejecting my dollar-based credit card) Mindy Vega's X-mas set for 2006-2007 at mindyvega.com Among the videos (sorry for the lack of dates): Mindy Main, Amy Reid, Bree Olson, Riley Shy, Lela Starr, and Cassie Young at the StuffedPetite, etc. group of Brazzers sites (These are all hardcore.) Liliane Tiger (HC in bed) at Pier999 Julie Silver (HC in the office) at Pier999 ETC. Wow, this is exhausting! ;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-07-08 03:24pm - 6073 days | #48 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
And just in case you haven't thought of it, you should be sure to point out that your newer photo content is available in both 1500 and 1024 pixels. I think it's a selling point that the tour should include, along with the all-in-one zips. I guess I feel like making this point because KarupsHA was doing 1500px since early last year but made no mention of it on its tour pages. The only way I found out? It was mentioned in a review here. Hooray for the reviewers that provide the details! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-06-08 02:01pm - 6074 days | #25 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Mud seems to be making a flow into the market recently. Hegre-Art has material with girls covered in greenish mud, and Just-Nude has a set out with the same kind of thing. Is this a trend that will grow? Personally, I think it's ridiculous. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-06-08 01:20pm - 6074 days | #7 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
'sright! The Incredible Hump, the Fantastic 4-Way, Slurpergirl, et cet-tra! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-06-08 03:14am - 6074 days | #4 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
It might make it easier for them to go out incognito when they wish to, as then they may be less recognizable sans the ostentatious porn style. And hey, it's fashion. It will pass soon enough. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-05-08 05:47pm - 6075 days | #17 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I love Lela Starr, too! Such a sweet 'n luscious petite! Mmm. You know, she reminds me of Mariska, the singer for the Shocking Blue back in the '60's. Check it out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzzpBjUX5H8 I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-05-08 03:24am - 6075 days | #9 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I don't know if Mindy Vega considers herself "Latin" or not. She's Cuban-American. Whatever. I can't get enough. Wish she'd appear on more sites. She'd look great on TorridArt, and better yet on MetArt, which does occasionally have girls from the Americas. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-04-08 04:07pm - 6076 days | #21 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Landscape is fine as long as the scene is well-composed. The girl is laying there, full and ripe of body. Snap! Then what do we get? Cropped butt cheeks, cramped crania, and missing upper appendages no matter what the orientation is. And then they'll pop it in their photo editor to overlay this hideous watermark which covers part of the girl's head or ass. And finally, they'll reduce the image quality so that important color and line information is magically vanquished before our eyes can see it. That finishes off the job! It's now ready for posting on the web! Honestly, I've seen "landscape-only" by this one photographer at ATK Premium, and in many shots the girl occupies about 30% or less of the photo. To me, that makes no sense. Some of them were even like, "Hey, who's that girl standing over there?" I emailed them and complained. When the girls are standing, sitting, or even laying belly down on a bed, portrait can work just fine, if you ask me. I guess the question is -- as the girl holds the pose -- which orientation works better here? I'd agree that sometimes the right choice isn't made. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-04-08 07:30am - 6076 days | #11 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I'd say Dora Venter (sometimes Ventner) is way up there. She's such a sexual natural! Love her accent, too. "Ohh, Dahhling!" she cooes at the moment of anal penetration. Riley Shy is another one. Those smiles and way she fucks and sucks. Yeah, she's got the porn DNA. Neither of them seem to have even a shred of inhibition. And Cassie Young! She's got an athlete's body, and she's a sexual athlete, too. And all of these girls are HOT in looks, too. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-03-08 02:07pm - 6077 days | #38 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Nah. "Hakuna matada" on that. I was just expressing my reaction to such things. I agree, it is surprising to see Adriana Malkova and Katerina Hovorkova on a pain site. I hadn't even known that Katerina had done any hardcore until I saw it on Denis Vision or something like that. (There's this porn actor named Denis something who has it with her and Vanesa Blue and some others.) This was a while ago. (Tried to find the site and only got something about contact lenses.) And there was a hardcore thing with Adriana on Dr. Hardcore. But these girls are so lovely and voluptuous that they probably don't need to take the shag route too often. BTW, I once joined (in Sept. '06) absoluteadriana and found about 40 photosets of her (softcore) that I'd not seen before, 1600px and in zips. It was referred by Evelyn Lory's former site at the time. It used to have an update calendar, but that got removed and I guess it's now another "zombie" site that only takes without giving anything more. ;) But I thought I'd mention it. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-03-08 01:14pm - 6077 days | #34 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Sorry, Jeff, my bad. I hadn't clicked the "save" button when I made the change. (duhhh) Have now, so it should work. Thanks! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-03-08 06:53am - 6077 days | #30 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
OK. Apology accepted. I do appreciate it. And I will accept that complimentary membership. I consider it a "gift horse" after all of the above. I've reopened my acceptance of emails forwarded from PU. Once I get the username and password from you, I'll close it again. (We all know how much spam can accumulate in a short time.) Thanks again. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-03-08 06:04am - 6077 days | #11 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
"Gonzo, the lead guitar player, placed his mutated member into her slithering slit! HA-HA!" (from Frank Zappa's 200 Motels) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-02-08 10:43pm - 6077 days | #28 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Looking at it in how things happened over time, there was 1. First my comment on the site June 11, 2007 "They're working on a redesign." That was very positive, as I was looking forward to it. 2. Then in August, 2007 you sent me the two emails (which you reposted in your above message to which I'm now replying). To me, they looked like they could be bribes. Could be. Of course, I could have been wrong, and you say that I was. I try to avoid getting into possible conflicts of integrity. You also said in your emails the following: "Hi Drooler, Jeff from Karups here. I saw the recent review of KPC on PU and your reply to it. I'll likely reply to both of them on the site later today, but wanted to send you a personal e-mail before I do ..." But you did not reply to them on the site (PU). I don't know what you'll say to this, Jeff, but that lack of upfront communication where members could see it made me wonder why. Had you replied, at least by August, to my June 11, 2007 comment with some indication that the site redesign was going to take longer than expected, then that would have helped both you, your site, and me. But you didn't. 3. Instead, there was nothing further until my Jan. 9, 2008 reply to Congestus, to which you responded on the same day. Well, of course I had felt a sense of betrayal. Here I was, having said something positive back in June, the egg still on my face, and SIX MONTHS LATER you bother to post on this site with your remarks telling me that somehow I'm in the wrong for feeling as I did by that time. Then I explained, YOU IGNORED, and you just offered a free membership as if what I'd said was just so much spit in wind. With the above as the developed context, my remarks on this forum are beyond you. You don't appreciate me "bashing" you or the site. And you think that I'm being "unfair." You poor thing! Me, I LOVE being bashed! Who doesn't? If I want some, I'll just give Jeff a call. This is almost funny. Well, now, I am very tired of this image manipulation nonsense. I've now said almost all that I care to say about it. Jeff, you can tell us how relieved you are at that if you want to. And go ahead and take a few more digs at Drooler. Besides, he kinda deserves it, doesn't he? It took him all of SIX MONTHS to develop that thin skin of his. One bit of advice, though: Don't wait for just negative statements to retaliate against. If someone says something positive here about your site development and it's not going as scheduled on your end, just drop us all a line and give us a heads up. We would appreciate it. And (this may get me in trouble with some people, I don't know but I'll be finding out), I've raised my rating of your site to an 85. Really, I'm just doing it for selfish reasons. Never would have dreamed that it would be made into such a big deal, but I'm tired of all of the complaining about the 75. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on May 02, 2008, 11:33pm | |
|
||
| 05-02-08 03:39pm - 6078 days | #33 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Nope, definitely NOT my thing. Skin reddened (or worse) by abuse is a major turn-off. Frankly, I think it's sick. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 05-01-08 11:41am - 6079 days | #4 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Nope. Some of the other ones seem to let real users comment on sites, but from what I've seen, none come close to where we are right now. And one place is good enough! PornUsers is the place to be ... (can be sung to the tune of, well, never mind ...) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-30-08 01:00pm - 6080 days | #4 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
"Attaboy!" buttons to Rick, Khan, and all the crew! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-30-08 12:16pm - 6080 days | #2 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Hey Denner, I've put my18teens into the bookmarks and look foward to the review. Thanks for the lead! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-30-08 02:32am - 6080 days | #9 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
A few closeups of the girl's face, eyes, breasts, and ass (especially) are nice, though there also have to be more complete shots as well. I hate it when there's a lovely shot of the girl's ass all evenly flat (but still round!) on a bed but no shots at the same angle, top of head (no cropping!) to upper thighs. I think the people who put out photosets like that are idiots. My computer monitor knows this better than anyone. The "In Tight" (which at least used to be a feature at DigitalDesire), "Bodyscape" (which still shows up at MPL Studios), and such are mostly a friggin' waste of time and money. I suppose it's life imitating art (?). But, as I've said before: Fuck art! I mean FUCK ... ART! We want porn! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-30-08 02:06am - 6080 days | #2 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
If you do a keyword search at TBP for "POV," you'll get 32 sites. Looking at the listing dates, it would seem that it started in late 2005 but then picked up a bit in 2006. This could be way off from the date you have, though. Just the same, TBP doesn't have a "POV" niche. I don't know if other review sites do. Could be. I got some thrills from DreamStash, which isn't in the POV list even though POV is mainly what it is with the hardcore. I got tired of the erratic updates and some of the photo quality. Copped a fair amount of vids from it, though. Haven't been since June 2006, and at that time it was bundled with Dr. Harcore, Exploited Cunts, and a very weird site called Boner Bunny, which had the girls being fucked by a guy wearing this big ass rabbit suit. I'd say that try as it might to be different and be more of a visceral sex experience for the viewer, POV doesn't work. You know the girl is fucking someone else. You can see the penetration -- but it would be worse if you never could. About the only good thing about POV is that it makes it a point to push the male out of view as much as it can. But it's just a step further from regular porn, which also avoids focus on the male most of the time. Boner Bunny took care of it by stuffing the dude in that big suit. There weren't many vids or pic sets on it. Can you imagine how overheated you'd get boning down on Veronica Vanosa while wearing this big furry bunny getup? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 30, 2008, 02:22am | |
|
||
| 04-29-08 01:56pm - 6081 days | #16 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I was trying to think of how to express this idea, but you nailed it, JBDICK. Well said! Even in my middle age, I find I still have an active imagination and it's easier to apply it to photos or to videos that don't have a lot of fast editing. How could anyone give me MY fantasies? Only I can do that. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-29-08 01:52pm - 6081 days | #15 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Maybe the strong differences in preferences can be at least somewhat understood by this. I hit 40 just around the time that the Internet that we know was really starting to pick up speed (though "www" then still often meant "world wide wait"). So nudie pics in mags featured prominently in my formative years. I'd learn Dad's in's and out's at home so I'd know when it was safe to delve into his Playboy stash and get another brain soaking of Miss January with the 60's hairstyle and also get a dose of social acculturation from Little Annie Fannie. (Anybody else remember those cartoons? They were hilarious!) Not that the Playboy style interests me anymore. It's too tame. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-28-08 11:53am - 6082 days | #6 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I've always preferred pictures because there's no sound or movement. The image quality is usually considerably better than in videos, too. Not that I don't like videos at all, but they're just not my favorite thing. You do realize that you're asking people about something that really cannot be adquately explained with reasons. They're just tastes, or what some might call preferences. Why do I get asked if I want cheese on a tuna sandwich? I think it's a weird question (the answer, to me at least, is obviously "no"), but I suppose some people like it. It makes me think of slow cows morphing into fast-moving, large fish. And some will insist on Swiss. Some people think Americans are weird because they put ketchup on French Fries. And I'm sure that for some, foie gras is an acquired taste. Frankly, I don't understand why people go for videos that take longer to download, have lower image quality, and take up more hard drive space. They often have bad editing, jerky camera movements, poor frame composition, mediocre sound (or annoying techno music tracks), and unrealistic or unappealing performances. And which they have to fast foward or click through on a player in order to skip past the parts they're not as interested in. But I'm not going to ask why. They can fucking have it if that's what they really want. LOL. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 28, 2008, 12:06pm | |
|
||
| 04-27-08 05:30am - 6083 days | #18 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
One word would sum up a big thing we have yet to see: Quality. (Videos that look great, photos that aren't blurry or grainy or overly watermarked, etc.) And here's another: Honesty. (Need I explain?) So far, neither of the two are looming large in the porn world. If they were, we'd be spending less time here. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-26-08 08:05am - 6084 days | #5 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Another kind of terminology are those terms they sometimes use for various kinds of hardcore. I used to puzzle over "ATM" and "Bukakke" (or is it "Bukkake?"). Finally, I figured them out as "ass to mouth" and "semen-surge facial from multiple males." Anybody else ever in the dark about the acronyms and other terms? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-26-08 07:10am - 6084 days | #10 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Thanks for starting this thread. If there's one thing that makes me gasp (again!) in frustration is "Hi-Rez pics" or something vaguely similar in a review. It means NOTHING!! It's like saying that a BLT is freakin' sandwich! But thanks to you and especially Toadsith, who seems able to type comprehensibly at 110 wpm, 20 pages per sitting, a lot of ground has been covered already. I've been tolerant and, wishing not to ruffle feathers, have not taken any reviewers to task for what seem to me to have been obvious omissions of points of fact. Hopefully this thread will serve as a "rising tide to lift all boats." Anyway, we'll see. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-26-08 04:12am - 6084 days | #20 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Well, that's a strategem that would work if most everyone did it. Nice idea there, exotics4me: offer a complimentary membership, and if it's accepted, you're guaranteed to have your score docked 10 points! I think that the webmasters are counting on some kind of quid pro quo (even dishonesty has its presumed limits), but this ... this would kill off the practice in a hurry. I can just imagine the rancor that would ensue, with webmasters screaming at the ingrates for, well, giving them a little remedial, tough-love parenting: "Now, Johnny, remember: There's no honesty among thieves." I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-25-08 11:45pm - 6084 days | #17 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Yeah, I'd think it would be a bad feeling to go from fellow PU (consumer) to "site toady" (shill). Kind of reminds me of those phony reviews that get cited for new movie releases out of Hollywood. Those reviewers must be on the take. The PU versions would be like "Best New Anal Site of the Year" and "A Triumph! (And I mean UMPH!)" and such. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-25-08 04:20am - 6085 days | #9 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I was contacted by KarupsPC. Their contact person asked me to reconsider the rating I gave them. I was also offered a free membership, but in a second email close in time to the first. I just changed my settings at PU so that webmasters couldn't contact me by email. Been that way since. Months later, there was exchange between myself and the KarupsPC guy at the reviews part of KarupsPC. (See replies to the review by the since-disabled "Congestus.") He chides me for ignoring those emails; the words he uses are that he "reached out" to me. But there was nothing at that time to "reach out" with because the major site update was months away from completion. My rating was based on the site as it WAS at the time, not as it was "promised" to be in the future. (I'm a sceptical sort. Have the burn marks to back it up.) Anyway, I wrote a long reponse to his chiding message to me; he replied by completely ignoring it and offering me a complementary membership right there in front of everyone. I guess he thinks that's OK. I don't get that guy. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 25, 2008, 04:24am | |
|
||
| 04-22-08 03:09pm - 6088 days | #4 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I'm with JBDICK. You guys run a fine, clean site, and you've also done a lot of work to make it even better. The forum, for the latest instance, is the easiest forum to use I've ever been on. (At lot of them are so full of detailed rules and iconography and so on -- and just want to post a little message -- that I don't bother sometimes.) You guys have your web smarts down -- and a helluva lot better than some of the sites that get reviewed here (a-hem). The only thing I've (very rarely) had trouble with was losing a reply or at least a long wait for it to post, after I've clicked to submit. But I'm not sure if that's a PU problem or another one. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-20-08 10:34am - 6090 days | #9 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
I agree on both counts. Legit PU members who don't do a lot here should be able to express themselves without getting "friendly fire" that would be intended only for negative shills. (Personally, I check the user for the kind of activity on record in addition to the slamming review(s), and if there isn't much, I at least know that I could be taking my chances.) Besides, some sites get quite a range of opinions. Where are the shills? Sometimes it's hard to tell, if there are any to begin with. And some shills are pretty good at covering their tracks. They participate in poll discussions, reply to comments or reviews, etc. I once found out that a user had been dropped once the admin folks at PU discovered that he was using a machine from one of the content provider web sites. That was a surprise. And of course some of them are pretty thin between the ears, or just too damn lazy to work up and keep up a good con. They're easy enough to spot. In any case, there are no guarantees in life, porn included. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 20, 2008, 10:37am | |
|
||
| 04-19-08 11:15am - 6091 days | #3 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
ta-ta's, pussy, lips, clit, buh' ho', and spelunking! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-15-08 08:57pm - 6094 days | #2 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
It's really true that the term "hi-rez" gets bandied about for all manners of dimensions ... and resolutions, for that matter. Any site that makes that claim and doesn't explain it in detail, don't take them seriously! But of course large dimensions, high dpi (say 300) in pics, and high bitrates in vids (not sure what the threshold number is for high) don't themselves guarantee good content. There are plenty of ways to fuck it up, and a lot of sites are expert at that. There was a poll or two a while back on this topic. You might want to look it/them up because as I recall some folks were pretty knowledgeable on the subject. (Not me, I'm just trolling around here. ;) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 01:52pm - 6097 days | #8 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Yes, indeed. The true stars of SimonScans are about 8 (or more) inches tall and 2 (or more) inches wide and are, in terms of colors and features, a virtual rainbow of diversity. But that's where the variety STOPS (sccrrreeeech! Bam!). For mind-numbingly repetitive toy obsession, SimonScans has no equal, and that's really saying something. And it's been that way for years. Even Marina/Euphrat gets upstaged by the plastic injection-mould crowd. You definitely made the right decision! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 11:47am - 6097 days | #6 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
The main problem is lack of personality coming through from the model. I think that's what accounts for a lot of the "sameness," but not all of it, of course. Beautiful, sexy, charming, photogenic -- it's asking for a lot, I know, but that's what I want. Marina/Euphrat is a great example of that fairly rare model who has it all. Just about everything I've found of her I've gotten. A lot of the poses might start looking the same, but it doesn't matter because I'm simply captivated by her. Sometimes it might be the photographer's fault. There's a new girl at HegreArt named Mia who, when she smiles, really shows a lot of sparkle and charm. But the galleries have too many photos of her with a plain and almost disinterested expression. "Naked Boredom" is less than 50% OK. Toys, I think, are a major problem, because any kind of props are going to distract attention away from the model's personality most of the time. Toys are done to such EXCESS that they lose all effect! The worst thing, though, is when, in response to complaints about boredom, the photographers (directors, whatever) take things in a kinky direction, with food play and whatnot. They just don't get it. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Apr 13, 2008, 11:52am | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 10:00am - 6097 days | #31 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
In the 80's I knew a woman who worked at porn theatre and she made the point that there are far fewer men in porn than there are women, so that's how the industry is biased in favor of pleasing men. And so it's been that way. It seems that way in Europe, too. Or is it that women who like porn prefer other women? I'm really in the dark on this one. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 09:18am - 6097 days | #7 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Word play! I love it! I know I've got more, but for now, I've always wanted a place to play even with model and porn star names, such as "Lucy Straddle Lover" for Lucy Stratilova. BTW, did you know there's a place in the Czech Republic called Bendova? A: Are you and your wife enjoying your stay in the Czech Republic? B: We sure are! We're doing as much as we can. In fact, she and her girlfriend are going to Bendova right now! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 04-13-08 05:51am - 6097 days | #16 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
Yes, there is an alternative to the birth canal. If Silvia plompted face down flat on a couch for me, I'd "honor her offer." And all night long, I'd be on 'er and off 'er. ;) BTW, there's another babe that must be mentioned here: Riley Shy! VERY HOT! DAMN. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. | |
|
||
| 1751-1800 of 1831 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 27 | 35 | Page 36 | 37 | Next Page > |
|
