Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: Drooler (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (1831)  |   Threads Started (45)

851-900 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 5 8 11 17 Page 18 19 23 27 31 36 37 Next Page >

09-07-10  03:25pm - 5229 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Just personal taste, but I don't like any tattoos on a girl, no matter how small the tattoo.

And I used to use the same technique of trying to identify similar-looking girls by the placement of a mole.

But as I'm getting older, I am losing energy and patience. And some of these models, no matter how cute, just look too much alike for me to tell them apart any more. Especially when they can have different hair colors, slightly different appearance at different ages or when shot by different photographers, etc. There are definitely times when I don't recognize a model in different photoshoots (usually because the photographer is different, but sometimes because of different hair color or some other change in her appearance).


I know what you mean. I saw something recently of Marie McCray somewhere, but she was going by a different last name, had quite a bit more weight on her, and a different hairstyle. I took me a while to process that. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

09-07-10  01:40pm - 5229 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Mole removal by surgery and/or photoshopping. Photoshopping is more common than you would think. You sometimes come across a photoset of a model you like, and it turns out, because there is little photoshopping in that particular photoset, that the model has moles and freckles and brown spots on her that you never saw before, so the simple answer is the other photosets were photoshopped or some similar technique. Makeup can also be used as covering.


Yes, sometimes moles are made to disappear by one of those means.

I've actually been frustrated by this since I occasionally use the location of a mole or two to identify a model. You know, some of them have so many aliases, and I try to keep all pics of each one in a single folder. So then I have to resort to nose shape, ear shape, or even dental work. It ain't easy!

Moles can be beautiful on some women. Bambi, the Hungarian model, for instance, has a lot of them, but I think they look nice -- when they haven't been magically vanquished by the Wizard of 'Shop.

Makes you glad sometimes that a girl has an signature tatoo ... No! I take that back! What am I THINKING??? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

09-07-10  11:57am - 5229 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Drooler - about Alyssa and Ass Traffic guess your're talking about that older dp-scene at the blue bar (that - the blue bar - has been used so many times)...I'm not crazy about dp, but here Alyssa looks just beautiful - great video.

And sure - what the US pornindustry had the euro - or at least easteuro ditto want: fake boobs.
Agree about Black Angelica - absolutely no need - a disgrace.
And take a look at Aletta Ocean - she EVERYWHERE now - never seen so many vids/pixsets with one euromodel in a long time.
But it's apparently like other markets: Most PUs (not ours, but generally) wants it, so...fake boobs all around, almost...

And BTW: Getting a little exited about Mina/Mirka (did not really focus on her much earlier):
http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/mirka.html

But her two great hc-vids at X-Art and her pix/vids at Eva's Garden - are something else..


Ah, yes, Mina/Mirka/Mima ... (I've got only ONE Mima, and that's her). The forbidden fruit/Lolita/jailbait blond cutie with the big, BIG round blue eyes, full-moon face, and the Rapunzel-blond hair. Definitely one of a kind. My favorite pic sets of her are from Eva's Garden: "Blue Jalousie" and "Pink World." And "Tratto" from Errotica-Archives. Well, all of them make the most of her asset ...

I've gone on a foolish tear and am now subscribed to three ATK sites (Galleria, Premium, and Petites). They've got some new stuff of Mirka/Mima at Petites (4 exclusive sets so far, plus about 15 sets from the other sites just in 2010). But no videos that I could find.

Getting back to fake-tit afflicted Euro princesses, I remember being absolutely stunned by the beauty of "Florancia" at 1byDay. I'd close the pic folder and have to come back and open it again just to feast my eyes her beautiful body, or even just her face. Then I saw her at either Club Sandy or PixAndVideo and was further smitten. So beautiful! And in a video I saved she was standing at an indoor balcony taking it from the back!

As you would say, Denner, "WAUW!"

But then she had plastic surgery that wrecked her face and enormous tits added to her chest. She had transformed herself into Aletta Ocean! Aahhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!

I mean, just compare this (sweet, young, sensual flower) to this (a Russ Meyer supervixen). I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Sep 07, 2010, 12:10pm

09-07-10  01:07am - 5229 days #6
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Good news, sports fans. Although Rocco Siffredi retired in 2004, he decided there was no king to take his place, and un-retired to come back into the business.

Quoting from a page on his web site:
In June 2004, Siffredi declared that he would retire from performing in porn for the sake of his children, and instead focus on filming and producing. "My children are growing up," he said, "and I can no longer just say 'Dad is going to work to make money for the family.' They want to know more."

However, as of 2008, Siffredi has continued to perform. Porn director Axel Braun told Adult Video News in 2004: "The problem is that he's been trying for years to find an 'heir to the throne,' but it's no easy task. He thought he found him in Nacho Vidal, but then Nacho went his own way."


Well, hey, ya gotta do whatcha gotta do ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

09-06-10  12:25pm - 5230 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Amigo! Oh, yes - not to forget Alyssa - and Times They Are A-changin - and we're getting older along with our favorite models - who sadly disappear...would it not be fun/great to see some of them still in business along with the maturity...well, in the US a lot of pornstars keep rockin on after they hit 35-40 or even more - but those cute easteuro models seems to get out a LOT earlier and more often....

Well, first: thanks for this info/update, Ze Droolah - guess I'll have to settle with the older material of Alexa. But now I'm still happy: going hunting for more Alyssa - missed out on quit a lot of that older stuff....



I have a habit of filing models by the first name I get them by, so it was kind of by chance today that I did find Alyssa, as Amber in that old, crummy site AmateurPages. The pics are 700 pixels on the long end! But I'm not going to let them go!

One of my favorite hc scenes with her is at Ass Traffic, where she takes on Zenza Raggi and some other guy. The intro when she strips is really hot, too. So there's a lead if you're interested. It still blows my mind.

You know, there seems to be more interplay between the Euro and American business than there was, say, 6-7 years ago. Like there are American girls who show up at 21th Sextury and DeFrancesco sites now, and Euro girls appearing at Porn Pros and FuckedHard18.

Which makes me go a little with the question: Have the Americans with their fake tits been an influence on the Euro girls to get them? I just don't recall seeing so much fake titty back in the earlier days of those Euro sites.

Like Angelica Black, for instance. Good grief, did she ever NOT need a tit job. Well, I'd better cool it while I still can. EOR (end of rant) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Sep 06, 2010, 12:31pm

09-06-10  07:52am - 5230 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I recall reading somewhere a few years ago that she was going to retire from the adult biz, around the same time that the stunning Ukrainian beauty Alissa was getting married and was no longer going to be doing the various things she used to do, either.

I really loved both of them, though I'm partial to Alissa (Alyssa, Allysa ...).

That news I mentioned might have been at PixAndVideo or Club Sandy. It was before PU.

Update: Here's an article from SportyOne announcing their retirement. In 2004. And Rocco Siffredi, too!

Well, dude, it looks as though we've outlasted all of them. (LOL) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Sep 06, 2010, 07:59am

09-05-10  07:10am - 5231 days #224
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Khan:


As an aside ...

This site has now been added. You may enter your remarks at:
https://www.pornusers.com/review/ceepink/


Thanks, Khan! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

09-04-10  08:05am - 5232 days #219
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Cee Pink is a new find for me. Was trawling around and found the site of Sarah Jain, and went from there.

Sarah Jain's site doesn't quite get across how hot she is, BTW. Her stuff at NextDoorModels is awesome. I just wish I could find more of her.

Cee Pink doesn't do much to show you what a member would get except for a small log of update shots. (They've got Sarah Jaymes. Mmmm!) I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Sep 04, 2010, 08:08am

08-31-10  06:40pm - 5235 days #49
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I've asked a lot of my friends about this and it seems that lots of women want tattoos but most men don't like women to have them (or anything more than a very small one somewhere discreet).

Asking women why they want one (or already have one) hasn't got me anywhere. Lots of answers of "because I just wanted to" or "it's a bit of fun" etc. etc. don't really answer the question.

I don't know what women think of men with tattoos?


Yes, either the women didn't think about it that much or they just aren't going to give you a straight answer. Maybe it's simply a defiant "If men don't want us to, we'll get them."

So the solution then is pretty clear: BEG THEM to GET TATOOS!

But start early! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-31-10  06:24pm - 5235 days #14
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I think that piercings are on the wane now, at least. We'll always have the pierced ears, probably, but not tongues, tits, and twats. But I think it will take a while longer to fade out, but not completely die out.

Hey, did you see the new boob job on Rebecca Linares?

Awwww, noooo!! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-29-10  08:53am - 5238 days #18
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I'm really not sure how comfortable I'd be in a relationship with or marrying a virgin. Prudishness doesn't sound all that attractive nor fun. Of course it could just be that she's a shy girl but still very comfortable with her body and a fearlessly dedicated masturbator, and there's certainly nothing wrong with that!

I'm sure there are more than a few here at PU who would totally take advantage of marrying a virgin. "Honey, trust me: all women normally start with anal. And for the last time; no, that camera is not on!"


Marrying, no. Initiating, oh yes ... but one might be hard put to find one at legal age. And she'd of course have to have the right attitude. I'd teach her about the MY favorite position. Then all the guys after me would owe me debt of gratitude. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-29-10  06:31am - 5238 days #42
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by mbaya:


PP there is a religious argument in favor of porn. In the Bible it says be fruiful and multiply. If porn is used to get in the mood for sex, show new ideas and positions, etc. relighions should embrace it. Call me crazy, but I don't see a conflict between our natural selves who like sex and the use of porn. Where do some people get the idea that religion frowns on sex? I know it says that adultery is bad, but what is the problem with sex itself? If God made us to enjoy sex, what problem is there? The problem is in how people twist the message.


Fornication is bad! Don't you all know that? There are still statutes in some states that make it a crime, sex between two unmarried people or at least one who is and other not. Can't recall if it's adultery depending on the gender of the married one, but I think it's the male.

Fornication is fun! That's why we do it! And watch other people do it.

Trouble is, everyone is so busy! So I propose a small step towards a solution: National Fornication Day. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-28-10  06:54am - 5239 days #21
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
The next time I open a brand-new Wittyguy thread, I'll be sure to do it on an empty stomach ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-27-10  06:05pm - 5239 days #32
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by slutty:


I just don't see how it is an insult TheSquirrel, it is not a victory mosque. It isn't the al queda fuck you america mosque, it is a mosque. I'm sure some non-terrorist muslims probably died in 9-11 as well, and their families might appreciate the mosque.

The Klan can hardly be considered a religion, this comparison is pretty invalid. And while a lot of nutty christian fundamentalists blindly follow orders as well, have we ever prevented them from building a church? Isn't it offensive to have a Catholic church near a school where kids were molested? Or should we just consider these actions are the actions of evil outliers, not actions of the religion as a whole.

I can't speak to how many muslims in the US agreed with the Rushdie fatwa, as that was when I was 10 - but I would imagine most American Muslims, particularly the African Americans, didn't react with the same fervor.

Regardless of how offensive people find it, if they want to build it they can. If the government steps in and prevents it, they violate the constitution, and it would set a horrible NIMBY precedent for mosques being built in America.


Well put, Slutty ...

Sorry about the "Slutty" part I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-25-10  02:42am - 5242 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I'm really with WittyGuy on this one. I also say, "Build it!" The US needs to say to its Muslim population, and to Muslims around the word, that they are respected and accepted by us. Just for there to be a controversy over the building of it sends the wrong message to them. We've more likely to live in peace with Muslims if we accept the mosque than if we reject it.

The US continues in its strange duality of being a world power, a world leader, and an insular nation with voices in the media that fearmonger, distort the truth, and just plain lie like there's no tomorrow. I think it is kind of sick for these people to be churning political capital for themselves over the building of that mosque.

And it SHOULD NOT be offensive to those who lost loved ones in 9-11, any more than if a McDonald's or an Outback or a church or a synagogue were being build there. Islam does not equal terrorism. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-22-10  06:52pm - 5244 days #17
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by pat362:


I was serious about a maximum of 2 terms because it's well known that many president's second term is more about their image and legacy and less about what they wanted to accomplish.

I agree that limiting a president to only 2 terms means that at some point a president like say Bush will be gone from office and can never comeback. It also means that if you have a great President that is getting things done but will need more than 2 terms to do it, is also limited by that 2 terms system. Americans have the ability, like any democratic society, to vote whomever they want into office and in return vote out anyone they want. I would think that a society that prides itself on the greatness of it's democratic system would be against anything that limits those rights and freedoms.

I think the one major advantage Canadians have over our Americans neighbors in that there is no such thing as long term campaigning. The Prime Minister can call an election when he wants to or he can wait until the designated date is reached but either way we only get two months of campaigning. It's less expensive this way then in the US.


Two months of campaigning, that would be great! Make it one!

And keep people from announcing their intentions to run until a week or less before campaigns start, just to keep the "pre-campaigning" stuff limited as well.

Oh, and no campaigning after being sworn in! You know, "Mission Accomplished" and all that nonsense.

And when people are hypocrites on the Sunday shows like "Meet the Press," let us watch them be harangued into silence. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-21-10  03:07pm - 5246 days #15
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I'm a pretty "clean" guy, really. Sure, I like porn and use bad language sometimes, but I've never been arrested for anything, have had very few moving violations, and I generally have kept my life in good order. All of the substance abuse was before the days of the desktop computer, quite a while ago.

I think Wittyguy's message is for people like me. We worry about such things, and we just don't have the guile or the impetuousness to know how we'd cope if some dirt on us came to light with people we didn't want to see it.

But I've seen and had to work with lots of people who do have the kind of willfulness to survive such things, to spin them back at their accusers, to do whatever it would take to deal with it. They know how to manipulate things.

I guess I could sum it up this way: The digital age is not going to make the human sleazeball disappear ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-21-10  05:32am - 5246 days #13
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I hate tattoos. (Have absolutely not a trace of ink on myself.) It's a shame, I'll say, that so many great looking women in porn have gone overboard with them: Brooke Banner, Nikki Nova, Liliane Tiger, Monique Alexander, and Tristan Kingsley, to name just a few.

I don't understand it, but regardless, I don't like it. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-20-10  05:06pm - 5246 days #5
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
If you ask me, obscurity is the best policy. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-17-10  05:32pm - 5249 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
We've all heard the expression "Life is bowl of popped cherries," but still ...

Glad I'm not socially bound to be insecure about a woman's previous sex life. Fine by me if someone's revved the motor up ahead of me. And it costs less and is less painful, I'd imagine. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-14-10  05:27pm - 5252 days #26
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


I signed up for "unlimited access" with BT only to find they have decided my 100gb per month is beyond what they consider acceptable, so my speed will now be limited to 1 mbps for a month. Here is part of what they say

"We emailed you recently to remind you about our Fair Usage Policy. Our records show that your broadband usage in July is now above 100GB.

In accordance with our Fair Usage Policy, and to protect the online experience for all our customers, we'll now be restricting your broadband speed at peak times only (typically this is between 5pm and 12am, but these times may change depending on the demands on the network) to 1Mbps for a minimum of 30 days. We'll continue to restrict your speed and notify you by email as long as your monthly usage remains above 100GB.

You have received this email because your broadband usage this month means you are a very heavy user (which is typically less than 1 per cent of all customers). If your usage has unexpectedly increased it may be for several reasons. If you have downloaded a peer-to-peer (P2P) client to your PC then your usage levels can be affected by other P2P users uploading files from your PC, you may need to adjust the settings or remove the client."


I used to get the same kind of stuff from my provider when I was on dialup, but they took a moral tone and said that what was doing was "to the detriment of other users." If it was modem pool, I suppose it was true. But they'd enforce it by denying connections until you'd call them to plead, and you'd get more finger wagging that way.

Assholes. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-10-10  04:43pm - 5256 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Wittyguy said it well in making his point that one's usage of language affects one's credibility, and by that I mean everything involved, be it spelling, punctuation, textual coherence, diction, and all the rest.

I'm actually annoyed by text message writing done in non-text-message contexts. The rationale for the text message "style" is efficiency, which makes sense to me, but there's plenty to be said for textual elaboration. People who "text" in their emails look like real idiots.

And about expressions such as "my bad," well, I've got my own list of peeves (who doesn't?), though "my bad" isn't one of them. There was a time in the '90's when "NOT!" was a popular shortcut to "I don't think so" or "It didn't turn out as expected," etc., though it seems to have pretty much run its course. I liked that one, too. It was fun. It was also a good example of how a simple Anglo-Saxon form could be given an innovative, highly-contextualized use that it had not had before.

Basically, the point I wish to entertain is that of having a range in the language. American English is a mixture of many influences, coming from the black community, the WASP community, the Jews, and on and on. And then there are all of the regional differences, which aren't as strong as they were before mass media, but which still can be noticed!

So from the bubbling cauldron of ever-evolving English, I just think it's good to have a range of speech forms. You aren't going to speak to your plumber in the same way that you'll speak to your lawyer, and you probably shouldn't.

I just wish that people would stop using "literally" when there's no common figurative equivalent, as in "Literally hundreds of people are outside waiting." "Hundreds" is just an indefinite quantity. It's nothing like a shower of felines and canines. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Aug 10, 2010, 04:51pm

08-10-10  04:19pm - 5256 days #20
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


All of the pics of her ass are blurry. Bizarre, because the pics of her face are quite clear. At first I thought it was an issue of perspective and camera focus - face in front, ass in back, face is clear, ass is blurry.

But then there are pics where the ass is right there in front - still blurry - wtf?


Yeah. If I really, really want to see the ass blurry, I'll buy some eyedrops, open a good "ass" pic, apply drops, then immediately cast eyes to the computer screen. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-09-10  04:44pm - 5257 days #16
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Different tastes, for sure. My biggest beef with Twisty's is that, even when they allow natural skin tones on the bodies, they blur the faces. What the fuck? If they think the models are ugly, they should hire different models - why blur the faces so often?

It's why my affection for ATK Galleria grows by leaps and bounds. They actually show what their models look like - what a concept!


Blurriness is exasperating. Twistys does a LOT of it at the face, and so does DigitalDreamGirls or "Desire" or whatever, I don't care. Sites that do fancy it as "artistic" to apply "selective focus" or other such euphemistic blather as a justification for RUINING what would be a good shot for the PAYING USER!!!!! ARRHHGGHHD*(A^%@*!!!

I'm a long-term MetArt subscriber who was none too pleased at today's gallery of Lorena when I discovered that a really nice pose of her showing her ass had said derriere in a blurry mess in the shots larger than the thumbs.

Are these people really THAT stupid or just lacking in taste?

But I'm not too keen on ATK Galleria anymore either. They have too many shots at a distance from the model. I guess I'm hard to satisfy. Comes with knowing what I want, I suppose. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-08-10  03:51pm - 5259 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
That's Aimee Addison? Well, she looks good in black! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-07-10  02:26am - 5260 days #42
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Have a look at TopMiss. It really IS in French, so it can't be listed here. The pics are exclusive (mostly) and in multiple sizes, but there are no zips! (Don't know if a download manager would work or not.) It also stopped updating some time ago, but the archives are substantial.

I was a member a couple of times a few years ago, but they no longer accept my attempts to join. One possibility was a lawsuit filed by someone else challenging rates of exchange and they since have refused dollar-to-euro transactions, or at least some. That's the best I can do to put the pieces together into a possible explanation. I never cheated them, and they never cheated me.

Too bad. I missed their final year's worth of their updates, including BAMBI! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-06-10  11:59am - 5261 days #18
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Hey, this forum is really whack!

Uhh, maybe that wasn't the best choice of words ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-05-10  12:32am - 5262 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


When they see that I've replied to their thread, they know they've become unpopular and ostracized


Yeah, but that's nothing compared to the fat crackling over the fire when those PU Awards come out! Everyone, steel yourselves! They're just a few short months away! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-02-10  05:04pm - 5264 days #19
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I think "3-line review" isn't necessarily meant to be taken literally. It's like saying that someone is a few cards short of a deck.

And suffice it to say it means a review that isn't a review at all. 6-8 bullet-pointed generalities and 3-4 sentences of vague and overly general "bottom line" sentence fragments can't possibly qualify as a review, if the term really means anything. You read it and still don't have nearly enough of an idea as to whether you'd join the site yourself. It's just a fucking waste of time. For everyone.

Including the putz who wrote it.

It can never be only about quantity (e.g., word count), of course, but that's how some of these piss-ant poor excuses for reviews cross the threshold and make it to press here.

So yeah, I'm bothered by them, though I figure that they'll just be noticed, glanced at, and from that point on permanently ignored by those who bothered with them that much.

We don't want to scare off newbies, nor do we want to make it seem like a graduate class in English, but so long as reviews are accepted or rejected as they are now, we'll keep getting the occasional "what the fuck was that about?" review of the atmosphere at the top of Mt. McKinley.

I can live with it. Hey, I think I'll go get the junk mail from my front step now and toss it in the recycling bin ...

I feel, y'know, inspired ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Aug 02, 2010, 05:15pm

08-01-10  10:33am - 5266 days #8
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I agree that the site seems pretty healthy. Sometimes a few days go by without a lot of comments or any fresh reviews, but eventually things pick up again.

I've said this several times before, but I'll continue to repeat it as often as I can: I am always impressed with the quality of the reviews here. I generally won't take a membership to a site until I read the review at TBP and here. But more than that, I'm always amazed at the level of civility here. I've been a PU for several years and a fairly regular visitor too and I can't recall any time when members got out of hand and flamed each other. Everyone here is very respectful of the site, the webmasters and each other. The irony in that is that so many anti-porn people would probably assume that we're all back-stabbers and creeps. Very little evidence of that exists on this site.

Great thread GCode. Thanks for raising the issue.


Maybe it's that porn makes us NICE. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-30-10  03:05pm - 5268 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Hi Denner,
I did a "Juliet" search on my drives, but no luck! I don't even have the LSG stuff of her. Sorry!

If I ever catch sight of her somewhere, will let you know. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-28-10  05:28pm - 5269 days #14
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by badandy400:


You wanna know how I manage my 50 TB of porn!?!? I dont! It is a huge freakin mess! I am open to suggestions on how to manage my porn that is spread across 40 or so drives in a cost effect way.


Here's an idea: Find someone who has great organizational skills, impeccable honesty and self-accountability, and a ravenous love of porn. Have that person organize your porn stash. And if copies of some of it get made, well ... you don't know nothin' ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-28-10  03:53am - 5270 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


As for me, the only reason I take time to visit PU at all is because of my apparently not so rare medical condition:




Funny how the hand wears out, but the Johnson doesn't! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-26-10  01:42pm - 5272 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Denner:


Started to manage my stash in models names - that's one way to do things.
But then there's ALL that stash with new or old material and a list of names/alias longer than a New York Phone Book... It's a mess.
Then started to manage according to monthly downloads at different external drives - now I got six different drives with about 1,6 TB material - and that's an even worse mess, when you some day say:
"Hey, where is that particular vid or pix set that I suddenly remember to have enjoyed some time ago?"
Then the search is a bit heavy AND sometimes not succeeded - because you just can't remember under which name this file was placed...And no matter what photo-programs and video ditto you use they can't help you - you got to have your own system, but this user will never get it 100%, never....
But ok, sometimes the challenge can be fun other times a nuisance...



I'll never get the perfect system.


Sounds like it's time for "QB"-sized hard drives! One of those would probably do ya ...

... for while, anyway. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-25-10  10:50am - 5273 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Managing that growing stash can be a challenge indeed!

For organizing, I do folders by model name and then in those the sites I've found each model in. Some have been on 30 sites or so!

Due to a 500GB drive getting too full, I've recently had to start migrating some of them to another drive, so V-Z have changed address so far. That's OK, except when I need to search for a model to see what I have of her or what names I have her by. (Have gotten into a habit of having a designed model name, then for other sites, as needed, folders named "at(site) as(name).")

For viewing, I just use the interface on trusty old XP: View-->Customize the folder ... -->Pictures. That allows for a slide show viewing in the window, which suits me fine.

I tried doing "web page" versions of galleries back when I had 98 2nd ed. Was taking way too much effort. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-23-10  03:02pm - 5275 days #13
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by slutty:


Obviously if you are only using 3 categories, they may be hard to define exactly what each includes/excludes, if you really wanted to categorize, I would think you would need more like 5 categories like:

Nudes - naked only, nothing explicit (no close ups, masterbation, etc)
Softcore - Closeups, masterbation, light lesbian - no insertions
Midcore - harder lesbian material (insertion), toy play, etc.
Harcore - Sex, blowjobs, perhaps some really hard lesbian/solo stuff (strap-ons, fucking macines)
Extreme - Group, BDSM, gaping, anal, etc.

I think there can definitely be "softcore" groping and kissing - like pretty much any of the American Lightspeed material.

Just my two cents, perhaps this would clarify some of the debate, I think to try and fit it all in soft/mid/hard would be difficult.


I think these five classifications are well thought-out.

And I agree that things would be too "fuzzy" with fewer -- even if the girls are shaved! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-18-10  04:44am - 5280 days #15
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Lilian White is a new beauty with really classic looks! I couldn't find her at EBI, but hoping to see more of her.

And I'd also like to add Emmanuel here, as she's known at Zemani, though she's also been at Fem Joy (as Monyka) and maybe MetArt.

Anybody remember that old Clint Eastwood (starred and directed) flick Play Misty For Me? Remember Jessica Walter? Don't you think that Emmanuel bears a striking resemblance? I mean, a young Jessica Walter, of course.

Just adding (Sept. 2nd, 2010). Have you seen Sarah Jain? WOW!!! Check her out at NextDoorModels. She's also got one set at MetModels. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Sep 02, 2010, 12:02pm

07-09-10  05:48pm - 5288 days #9
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I've seen things in which there's never penetration, but just close proximity. Sandy (Zsanett Egerhazi) did at least one of those. And there was that girl in the late 90's, really thin and very foxy, was on Digital Dreamgirls and Suze ... what was her name? Ahhh! And she did real hardcore, too, with her butt-ugly boyfriend. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-09-10  04:23pm - 5288 days #10
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Goldfish:


A few newbies I've been enjoying.

Kasey Chase
http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=Ka...er=f/Kasey-Chase.htm

Amia Miley
http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=Am...der=f/Amia-Miley.htm

Melanie Rios
http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=Me...r=f/Melanie-Rios.htm




How I could I have forgotten Melanie Rios' sister, Valerie? They're both hot, of course. I haven't seen any hardcore of Valerie, btw (plenty of Melanie!). Anyway, Valerie's got nice pics at MetArt and even Nubiles! And elsewhere (can't remember offhand). Great smile! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-05-10  04:17am - 5293 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
There are male performers who are "reliable" in getting and keeping John Henry on the clock, and then there are those who are at times, shall we say, less fortunate. When flaccidity looms, the camera keeps rolling ... cut, print, sell! There's no Underwriter's Laboratory for it. We are about the closest thing to that.

I just wish they'd leave out the parts when the guy's having a soft spell. I don't care to watch the males play with themselves. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-04-10  09:05pm - 5293 days #27
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Even just in the last few years there have been books and self-proclaimed experts to debunk Obama's 'agenda,' along with a growing (but different) crowd to publish books and debunk the teabaggers. Hey, can't people have there fun for a little while before someone dumps all over it? Me, I really just want to look at naked ladies show off there naughty-and-nice parts, I don't want to hate women or maintain an already well-established patriarchy! Go pick on someone else!


The thing is, they need porn around to pick on. If it just disappeared, they'd have to go find a new sandbox to put their turds into. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-04-10  05:25pm - 5293 days #22
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by null:

Images have now become so extreme that acts that were almost non-existent a decade ago have become commonplace. From studying thousands of porn films and images Dines found that the most popular acts depicted in internet porn include vaginal, oral and anal penetration by three or more men at the same time; double anal; double vaginal; a female gagging from having a penis thrust into her throat; and ejaculation in a woman's face, eyes and mouth.

"To think that so many men hate women to the degree that they can get aroused by such vile images is quite profound," says Dines. "Pornography is the perfect propaganda piece for patriarchy. In nothing else is their hatred of us quite as clear."


I have a different perspective on the kinds of imagery discussed above (quoted from the article this thread is about). And I might as well say up front that I don't care for any of it, either.

To me, that kind of material is to porn what the "zipper" incident was in There's Something About Mary, or the pie fucking in American Pie, or any number of foolhardy stunts in Jackass. It's all intended to create a sensation. It's extreme (though cumshots are all too commonplace, and have been around for DECADES), and I doubt that most people outside of porn actually do those things or ever will.

But it's really a leap of interpretation to say that it's "propaganda" for "patriarchy." Patriarchy?????? What patriarchy? When a couple divorces and there are children, the mother much more often gets custody of them than does the father. Boys grow up estranged from their fathers, whom they need as positive role models, and girls grow up without developing a good male counterpart role model for the same reason.

You want to talk about imagery? When you watch television advertising, at least in the US, men are routinely portrayed as fumbling, childish dolts who are somehow tolerated by their wiser, more sensible female counterparts.

I mean, where is this "patriarchy" that this woman is talking about? And anyway, since when does patriarchy mean that women are hated? If so, does that mean that in a matriarchy that men are hated? Just trying tease out the logic of this to show how absurd it is.

I guess that pornography is a ready target, which makes it relatively easy for those who develop a career path out of attacking it. It's far easier than attacking graphic, non-sexual violence, which portrays the relationships of human beings to each other as simply cruel.

Why complain about the images of people's limbs being hacked off, of their faces being cut to pieces, of their guts spilling out, when you can make a living out of attacking pornographic circus stunts? I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-02-10  03:02pm - 5296 days #2
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I usually skip past that stuff and get right to the essentials. But then if the guy gets his finger into things, it might ruin the scene for me. Saw this scene of Breanne Benson with the guy in from the back, and then he keeps poking his finger in her anus! POV. So his hand is in the way of MY VIEW and he's doing something both disgusting and unnecessary. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-01-10  06:38pm - 5296 days #12
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


OK - but only if I get to appreciate Denner for bringing to mind the truly wonderful Monty Python's Flying Circus

Oooooo - I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK, I sleep all night and I work all day...

I love those guys!


Buried the cat today.

Put up an awful fight it did. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

07-01-10  04:57am - 5297 days #13
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
If you look at some of the material on the "young and old" sites, you'll see guys that are ugly, and fat, and wrinkly and withering as well. Yet quite a few of the girls at least seem as though they're enjoying it. I mean girls like Lauryn May, Leanna Sweet, and Jasmine Gold. I guess they're just real professionals! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

06-30-10  03:59pm - 5297 days #7
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Well, I guess it was that time again ...

to whup some spammer ass. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

06-29-10  05:32pm - 5298 days #4
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Those who cannot write lend books. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

06-28-10  12:02pm - 5300 days Original Post - #1
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA


Carrying on in the tradition that Denner started -- just last year

Well, to start things off, Kitty Jane! She goes by other names, but anyway, have you seen this girl?? Incredible!

She's appeared a number of softcore sites (MC Nudes, Eva's Garden, and most recently at Watch4Beauty) but also at a lot of hardcore sites.

Actually, I think I first saw her at Karupspc last year. Whatever ... I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

06-28-10  11:55am - 5300 days #205
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by Khan:


FYI ... we're looking into this to see if there's an adjustment that can be made.


Followup (posted later)
Should be fixed now. Thx for the heads up.


Thank you! I appreciate that very much. It's a small thing, but it's because a small thing like that is treated as important that I'm grateful. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

06-27-10  03:23pm - 5301 days #3
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
I've joined a small handful of sites over the years that had 1-month-non-recurring-by-default subscriptions. My guess is that they didn't want the potential hassles of dealing with subscribers who might let their memberships run past that monthly line and try to recoup the losses. And in some cases, they were sites that no longer updated ():

Ambra's Dreams (), Body in Mind, Czech-Angels, Domai, Rigin, Claude Christian, SuperNiceGirls, and Sweet Lilya ()

And then there was that DDF mid-summer special last year; sorry to digress.

Messmer, you've got a great idea and I wish that more sites would embrace it. Yariana's analysis supports it, and that is reflective of my own pattern of join, quit, wait, lurk, check PU ... return.

It would be a lot less hassle for everyone.

And while I'm at it, I wish that sites would stop it with the bullshit premium price tags on non-recurring memberships when the user can just cancel the cheaper "recurring" membership in 29 days or fewer. Such was NEVER a recurring membership anyway. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

851-900 of 1831 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 5 8 11 17 Page 18 19 23 27 31 36 37 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.