Yes, I use the master pull down to access everything, too. That is where the problems occur as I can get into some sites and not others. Whenever I add a site or change my Password, the problems begin.
The support staff is usually very helpful when I contact them but occasionally, they will automatically reset my password even when I ask them not to.
But the problem goes a little deeper than that. I know I'm bringing some of this on myself, but I'm guessing you have experienced the same thing. I have had a Met Art membership for over 10 years now. Occasionally, I will get a discount offer for one of the MA sites from some other source. But when I try to take advantage of the discount, the MA network recognizes my email and presents me with an undiscounted rate. The only way around this is to use a different browser and a different email. So I have 6 subscriptions under 2 different email addresses. Even worse, the subscriptions are supported by 3 different billers (ccbill, epoch and rocketpay). A few years ago, I pointed all of this out to the support folks and they consolidated all of my accounts under one email address and user name....until I add a subscription or change my password. When that happens, some kind of reset occurs and a bunch of my sites are still linked in the master menu, but when I access them, I'm told the subscription has expired. The bottom line is that Met Art policy, created by some executive who never has to deal with customers, treats customers the same way a cell phone company or Comcast treats customers. They create all kinds of incentives for new customers, but don't want existing customers to take advantage of those incentives. This is obvious even within the Met Art Network, where if you click on a link directly, say...of a model that has other sets on other sites listed at the bottom of the page, the sign up is $29 a month for that site, but if you go through the pull down menu, the same sign up is $19 a month. And when you find a promotion for, say, $9 a month or $79 a year, the system does everything possible to ensure that you can't get it because you are an existing customer. To be fair, you can't really blame them for doing this, but you can't really blame me for wanting to take advantage of the best discounts either. I know the support people spend a LOT of time fixing things when people work the system to get better rates. I am a shining example of that.
You could not have sex with a woman because she was shaved? Seriously? I'm sure there were a few other things going on there that you are not mentioning.....right???
Somebody "not-trusted" me because I dissed this site so I signed up again thinking maybe it had changed. Navigation is a little different. Sets are still not dated. Still one set a week. Now only about 275 sets total. One new model I recognize from Hegre.com (Ageta here, Magdelena on Hegre, one of the circus twins...) The rest are amateurs. Still very little make-up. Still very clinical. Sstill very little eye contact. Mostly horrible photo-set videos showing how gawky most of these girls are. Many recent release videos are not full HD and several recent videos have opening credits listing a different web site (so it is older purchased content). I wrote an updated review but it dissappeared when my PU login timed out so all I have time to write is a comment. Still rate it less than 70. There are a few much better "flexy" sites and several softcore sites that do flexy occasionally, but much better than this. I just spent $30 to see if maybe my impression of this site was wrong. It wasn't.
I grew up in south Florida where they had every type of porn/sex/strip outlet and I had sampled most of them by the time I left for college. I tried a theater once but it was pretty boring considering how lax the rules were back then at some of the strip clubs.
I'm a little dissappointed that the annual subscription rate is now among the highest in this genre at $119. That is more than Met Art, Hegre, MPL and Watch4Beauty. The $89 annual rate listed by PU no longer works. I've been a member of FemJoy for nearly a decade but am going to wait until I see a better rate someplace before I renew.
These days, a lot of the latex pocket-pussy things are made in the likeness of many porn stars. I probably have a couple, but I can't recall which porn stars they are. I don't buy those things because they are in somebody's likeness....
I'm not sure I understand. You gave the site a 95 but didn't really explain why. Are you really saying this is one of the best porn sites on the Internet, which is what 95 means?
Also, what is daring about the sex? Is it in public? Is it in dangerous places? Looking at the images, I don't see anything particularly daring.
I visit MFC and chaturbate moderately often, but I do not look for privatge shows there. There are other sites that are set up for private shows, like metcams. With MFC and Chaturbate, mostly Chaturbate, I'll give tokens to the girls that are particularly impressive so they do things in thier public room. I don't care if somebody else is geting off on my dime. I'm not really there for the conversation anyway.
Just look at the numbers of viewers in each girl's room on these sites and you will see that for every one person paying tokens, there are hundreds just watching.
Don't expect a first class private experience on these sites. Just go to one that specializes in private if that is what you want.
Call them up and telling them you are moving to a competitor. (Check to make sure you have a competitor first) They will connect you to the "customer retention" department. Those people are authorized to negotiate a better deal and will usually offer a pretty nice package for 6 months or so.
I cull on a regular basis. Non-HD videos are pretty unwatchable these days. I also have an archive of stuff that I might want to look at but is more than 10 years old.
I'm thinking maybe this question could have been phrased differently....
I've never watched porn in public or on a smart phone.
I do, however, have several iPads including one I keep next to my bed and one that I travel with. So I will, occasionally, watch porn on an iPad in a hotel room. Considering there was once an entire industry focused on getting you to buy expensive Spectravision movies in hotel rooms, I don't consider this a big deal.
Ok, four things (started out as two but then I started thinking about it...). First, if I'm watching a sex scene by myself, I want the male to be as non-descript as possible. If the fantasy is supposed to be that the guy is me, then I don't really want the video to emphaisize him at all and he can NOT be distinctive in any way. I am older but, as long as I'm fantasizing anyway, I may as well fantasize that I am 20-35 and I certainly don't really want to see a 60+ guy in a sex scene. it is too distracting.
Second, the same thing applies to POV and VR videos. If the guy is a surrogate me, he should be as generic as possible. "Hey! Look at my giant chest tattoo!" or "Hey look! I'm Black!" is not really something I enjoy be distracted with in VR or POV.
Third, there are some male actors that are so incredibly sleazy looking, I have a hard time watching the video. These are not necessarily older guys but guys who look like they just crawled out from under a bridge. Fetish Network has a prominant male who falls into this category. He is perfect for the "home invasion", "hitchhiker" and older bondage videos on that site, but after a while, I found I just could not watch him.
And fourth, if my wife and I are watching porn, the male needs to be the best looking guy on the planet and he needs to be...capable in many ways. The idea of the two of us watching an older guy bang a younger girl in a video does nothing for her, so it sort of defeats the purpose of watching the video in scene in the first place.
OK, first of all, there have been no new anal scenes that I can find since the few that were posted in 2014. So if you are avoiding the site because you don't like anal, go ahead and join up.
Second, to the webmaster. The marketing and page positioning of the additional-purchase "Staff Selection" videos is annoying and insulting. On at least one page (streaming), there is no indication at all that the video is an axtra cost purchase until you click on it and see the option for the preview and offer to purchase. I subscribe to many of the Met Art sites (6 currently) and this is the only one that tries to sell me extra videos. On this MA site, the spot normally reserved for the newest video or photo shoot is always occupied by this bait Staff Selection video. Just fricking STOP IT! If you want to sell videos seperately, establish a site for that or at least put them over on the side where you market the live site. We know you have the resources to do that. You guys have terrific sites! Don't cheapen them by doing things that some of the other, sleazier sites try.
First, the site has stopped creating new material for most of the old sites and created a few new ones that are even lamer than the old ones.
Second, cancelling is even more difficult than before. There is a cancel page, but all it does is offer you a discount and does not confirm you have been cancelled. THe only clickable option on the page is to continue your membership. They are now using a "service" from Segpay called Segpay gateway. If you call, email or chat with Segpay, they insist that they have no record. I had all of the billing information right in front of me and he still said he had no record. (Really sucks on their part....I guess I'll never use Segpay again). The ONLY way to cancel is through the web site. I have seen a lot of crappy billers before, but this one, supported and condoned by an otherwise decent biller, is the worst. After 10 minutes chatting with a guy at Segpay, he basically said that the only thing I can do is contact the webmaster at Fetish Network. Wow. That's incredible.
So all of the folks here telling you about cancellation issues are absolutely correct. Cancelling at Fetish Network is a pain much more real than any of the simulated fetish crap they post.
Thanks for the update. It is always nice to see the webmasters checking sites like this for reviews and comments. It shows that they care and are attentive to their subscriber's comments. I have seen the mobile option on the site lately, but I am old-school with a PC and giant monitor. Overall a terrific site!
I'll add that I've never seen a site that only provides images in landscape-only or portrait-only format. And if you want some GREAT wallpapers, go check out Digital Desire. J. Stephen Hicks is an awesome photographer and, in addition to regular photo shoots, he provides one nude and one beautiful landscape scene a day (often it is a great landscape with an ungodly beautiful girl someplace in the image, often clothing optional.)
I was last a member of Digital Desire in 2017 and and can say it is medium-core old-school glamour. Good stuff if you haven't been there before.
OK, first off, About half of the images are landscape. I prefer landscape images and I can tell you that there are some mind-blowing ones here.
Second, Amour Angels is not affiliated with W4B or any other popular site that I know of. I was a last a member of that site in 2014 or 2015, although for some reason it looks like I did not write a review for it. The site uses several of the same models that Met Art, Fem Joy and W4B uses, (Like Emily Bloom and Serena Wood) but they also have several models that I have not seen elsewhere. I would define Amour Angels as a professional site, but with more of a buble-gum kind of flavor. (Big flowers, hats, lots of props, etc.) Almost all solo and girl-girl posing, strictly softcore. Videos are just posing, laying around, female form stuff with some close-ups. The models are mostly cute, young, slender, petite...really young. (All ofthe girls are 18+.) The sets I have of popular models are from when thyey were just starting out. I just looked and I saved 229 sets and 29 videos, mostly because of the exclusive models not seen elsewhere. To answer your orientation question, there is also a good balance of landscape and portrait images here. The site may have changed a little since 2014-15, but this is what I have from then.
Hope that helps.
...Now I have to go back and join Amour Angels again. This time, I'll write a review!
I'm assuming yoiu are talking about listing scenes on the tour pages, correct?
A listing of scenes or a count of scenes?
Some sites have a lot of scenes, so listing them in the tour section would be pretty difficult, although some sites are set up so you can see thumbnails of scenes/sets but not watch them.
To me, the number of scenes and the frequency of scene release are pretty important stats.
I really think you can get a read on whether a site is honest or not by looking at the preview pages and reading reviews. If the informatio nyou want to see about the site is not there, move on.
I think most of the time the rule about topics at the diner table is SEX, politics and religion. Fortunately, PU covers the first item quite nicely. Facebook and Twitter seem to have a handle on the other two.
Can we go macro for a minute? This is a great community, but sometimes there are bad players. PU has a "report" option in every thread but I'm guessing people don't use it very often. Like the "trust" ratings, there is also a potential for people to abuse the process "reporting" others who don't share their views on a particular site, etc.
PU members are a rare breed and it is refreshing being able to talk about so many un-PC things. I mean, just saying the letters BDSM in public these days is likely to get you arrested. (kidding...mostly.)
How do we develop a system where people are free to say what they want, but those who make particularly biased, racist or religously tainted comments are politely told that their comments are not appreciated? I honestly don't know.
Ultimately, like the Whopr discovered in the 80's movie War Games, perhaps the best way to win when people are trolling or presenting controvercial comments is NOT TO PLAY. Just don't respond to nonsense. If you do, you are only provoking more.
Looks like these guys are sending out $9.95 offers to former members or to some list they got. I decided to re-join, but when I rejoined using the same info as before, I got some kind of "not eligible for offer" response. Interesting... When I tried it again and used a different email address, there was no problem. Goofy. It looks like there are some new micro sites but it also looks like a few other ones I wrote about before have stopped updating. I'll write a revised review within the next few weeks.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
