| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hate it, but each to their own I guess.
|
12-08-14 03:24pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Chrome and Internet Explorer. I only use Chrome. I'm not actually a fan of any browser really, and all have their faults.
|
11-30-14 04:48am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Video. I enjoy photos, and I understand why many PU members prefer images, but for me video is a great way to see models in motion, enjoy their personality and marvel at their technique, something photos often can't convey.
|
11-30-14 02:02am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't mind it at all. Some of my favourite Tia Ling scenes were her massage scenes. It's not a particular niche I follow, though.
|
11-07-14 08:38am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No objections to this whatsoever.
|
11-02-14 01:44am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
77.7 - most sites I've joined have been very good, but a few have been pretty disappointing.
|
10-17-14 04:36pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It depends - I've seen good banter between models and cameramen before, sometimes it brings out the best in models. But often it's just annoying.
|
10-07-14 03:04pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
One of my girlfriends looked like Sarah Peachez. Coincidentally her name was Sarah too. She was incredibly promiscuous, had a lot of fun with her in the few years that we were together :)
|
09-16-14 09:56pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think so, yes, when you consider that your porno pound goes towards paying the models/talent gets their fair share, the webmaster(s) get their cut, any outfits and props, any studios they may need, the photography equipment, the web hosting and bandwidth plus probably a million other things I've forgotten.
|
09-01-14 12:52pm
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most of the sites I join are solo sites, and honestly, most have a pretty lousy track-record of updating in that I have often joined just as they stop updating. The idea that this could happen when I commit to a 3-month membership really puts me off.
With the big network sites, I normally dip in-and-out membership-wise, so I'll join for a month, catch up with updates, then rejoin a few months later.
Also, I don't normally like to have more than one or two memberships at the same time, so I don't like to put all my eggs in one basket.
|
08-17-14 01:31am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I really like it, so long as it's not a substitute for a real update. For me, a model's personality is really important and it's a big reason why I like models like Riley Reid.
|
08-15-14 09:31am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Twice, and both times it was resolved. First time was with Chica's Place, and they sorted it pretty much immediately. The other time it was with Bryci's site which was sorted after quite a protracted discussion.
|
08-13-14 11:41pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I completely agree with Pat, I voted no too. It's not the same thing, plus 95% of the women who will take advantage of being able to go topless will probably be the ones we'd prefer not to.
|
08-09-14 06:12am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I said not important at all, but that isn't to say I don't mind scenes with a narrative to them.
|
08-06-14 12:43pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Probably 60% hardcore, and 40% solo.
|
08-02-14 01:08pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Videos, normally. If it's a network site, then by model videos.
|
07-28-14 12:58am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Some are, I guess. I like athletic figures (a lot of female sports stars/athletes for example) and fitness models like Zuzka. So long as they're still feminine, though.
|
07-10-14 03:01pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not really interested in its current form, but I wouldn't write it off completely, particularly if there's still an option for 2D. I voted for 'only slightly interested'
|
07-05-14 12:26am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
1, but it's dead, so strictly speaking it's a doorstop.
|
06-19-14 11:43pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Surprised there's no 'none' option, so I've voted 'other'
|
06-08-14 02:31pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I always try and organise as I download, but sometimes, where it isn't possible to right-click download to target, it will end up in my downloads folder, then I'll move into the appropriate place within a day-or-two.
|
06-01-14 12:33am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Depends on the type of site. Daily to several times a week for a network, while weekly (several times a month) I'd say is frequent for a solo/amateur site.
|
05-28-14 03:02pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
C for me, although B is a close second. Honestly, I'm not generally too fussy at all - shape is the most important aspect to me (more than size).
|
05-20-14 12:56pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Cropped thumbnails are pretty annoying as they're always indiscriminately cropped, often meaning you have to guess what's what's missing.
|
05-14-14 03:21pm
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sonofzog's Reply
I'm with you. I've read and re-read and it makes no sense to me whatsoever.
|
05-12-14 11:12pm
|
