| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Super Glam
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
You've got 2 months to go !!
|
04-27-08 11:52pm
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I love porn names. Remember Carol Connors was named after Archie Bunker!
|
04-27-08 11:41pm
|
Reply
378
|
K Package Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
But if you dig deep, you'll see that he suckered the poor webmaster from Twistys into a long argument over him giving Twistys (2 hotlinks!) a 57 score. I guess I didn't notice it at the time, or I would have clued the Twistys (there's 3) webmaster to this shill.
You may add your reply here:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3118
|
04-27-08 05:03am
|
Reply
379
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
No I don't, and I think it is a brand new site. The girls are Just Teen girls, I can see that. It says it updates only 3 times a week. I spent so much time downloading those huge photo files off of JTS, that I didn't take many videos. But I'm wondering if these are JTS Videos here. I can't help you with that, but I suspect they just might be.
|
04-27-08 05:00am
|
Reply
380
|
Teens Like It Big
(0)
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Review
Good review.
One question---are there photo sets on this site? And if so, what size?
Thanks.
|
04-27-08 03:05am
|
Reply
381
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Review
Isn't it time this shill was banned from our site???
|
04-27-08 02:57am
|
Reply
382
|
K Package Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes... Like the great Markus:
TRUST USER? YES (0), NO (17)
This guy is the worst. He shills all these sites, and look at the score he gives the competition! LOL
https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1257
|
04-27-08 02:52am
|
Reply
383
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I just ended a membership at JTS, and I don't recall them mentioning this.
|
04-27-08 02:49am
|
Reply
384
|
Miss Laura Lee
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Review
The only way to save photos from a rip off site like this is to do a screen capture and edit.
Not worth the time that would take though.
|
04-26-08 04:36pm
|
Reply
385
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Let the dead bury their dead.
I truly thought that those ridiculous implants were a thing of the past. I'll say it: they're ugly! There is no cleavage. They don't jiggle. They look like they're going to explode (and sometimes do). I have actually touched them, and they are hard as rocks. Men that like them should curse their mothers for bottle feeding them.
In a word: they should be outlawed!
|
04-26-08 04:58am
|
Reply
386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
JBDICK's Poll
I hate the whole concept of "MILF". I wouldn't watch if your mother was in it.
|
04-25-08 12:17am
|
Review
387
|
Danni.com
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Large Selection Of Models
- Hi-Res Photos
- Zip Files
- NO DRM
- Virtual Lapdances!
- Live Chats and "Events" With Models |
| Cons: |
- Fake Body Parts Everywhere
- Oldest Material Is Dial Up Quality
- Danni Not Very Present In Recent Material |
| Bottom Line: |
Shay Laren did a nude live chat here that is archived on video. That's a selling point! The site is always doing live events, which they archive on video, and we aren't just talking about random girls for hire, like Met-Art. It gives the site a certain club like feeling.
This site has a ton of material dating back to the 90's. The photos are zipped for your convenience. The newer photos are 2000px. The oldest photos are glorified avatars.
A ton of videos also, 1000k bitrate, I couldn't get the size. Nothing special in video quality, but a lot of variety, they have a whole section of virtual lapdances that are very intriguing.
Of course you will see the famous "In Bed With Danni" videos all archived here. Danni doesn't seem to model too much anymore, although she has some current sets. A lot of these "sets" have only 1 photo! But she does have a lot of her voluptuous self archived.
One major turnoff is the large amount of models sporting water balloon implants. Yecch. Thought this tasteless trend went out in the 1990's.
With the TBP special bargain, the site comes at a good value.
If my review comes across as a bit "blah", it's because that's how I feel about the site. it's OK, just OK. At one time, way back in the 90's, this may have been a revolutionary internet event, but now it is way back in the herd IMHO. |
|
04-25-08 12:16am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
388
|
Pure POV
(0)
|
Reply of
wally's Reply
To tell the truth, I have not seen a single POV site that understands the concept. It's always the same thing: they aren't smart enough to understand that the male in the video
Should never talk
Should never touch the girl
Should never touch himself
Should never have his face shown
And the girl should always be acting toward the person viewing the video.
But the people who make these things don't understand this. .
The only sites I could suggest to you belive it or not, are Jsexnetwork and actionjav. They're not POV sites per se, but the Japanese understand what POV is, and a great deal of their videos have POV. They even have POV kissing! They use glass to do this. And the girls are always acting toward the viewer.
Other than that, there are no true POV sites out there.
|
04-24-08 11:27pm
|
Reply
389
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
zachvenice's Reply
I posted this comment last September, when I was a member, and as I recall the speed was about 100kb/s.
I did just download one of your sample videos at 950kb/s.
|
04-24-08 03:49am
|
Reply
390
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
zachvenice's Reply
Well, I'm glad to hear of this because that is what I found so frustrating when i was a member. Maybe I'll look into it.
|
04-24-08 03:44am
|
Reply
391
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Did you know that your phrase "eurobabes" has turned into a link!
|
04-23-08 02:41am
|
Reply
392
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Harris is a tremendously disappointing site IMO. I did give Danni a try with the discount when I wouldn't ordinarily have joined.
|
04-23-08 02:38am
|
Reply
393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
A friend and I went to see Last Tango In Paris back in the day and were mightily disappointed at the lack of porn in it. Why it got an X rating I'll never know. We did enjoy sitting in back of 2 old ladies though!
Caligula would be a better example I think.
|
04-20-08 09:50pm
|
Reply
394
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
Porn that attempts to be "serious" is porn that is never screened on my monitor.
Give me cheesy every time!
|
04-19-08 11:46am
|
Reply
395
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
FYI, I saw no popups using the Opera browser.
|
04-17-08 09:36pm
|
Reply
396
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Comment
I appreciate the warning concerning this nasty practice, but....
if popups didn't work, sites wouldn't use them. My curses are reserved for the idiots (and there have to be thousands and thousands of them) who buy stuff with popups. Sites don't use popups to annoy, they use it to sell stuff to fools.
|
04-17-08 09:32pm
|
Reply
397
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
I'm a believer in the theory that all actions cause reactions. If the internet continues to flaunt pornography, it's only logical for those against it to act in the extreme. Internet porn is illegal in some middle east countries. But those are deeply religious centers, America and Europe are very anti religious, so I don't see it happening anytime soon.
|
04-13-08 02:00pm
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
What's the old saying? "If you don't have anything nice to say, say nothing at all".
|
04-11-08 04:50am
|
Reply
399
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks. If I understand you properly, i don't use portals to join sites, although i will look at them to find sites sometimes. If I do find a site, I go directly to TBP to find out about it.
|
04-10-08 04:37am
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well, if you really want to get even, when you find a site you like on that portal, don't click the link, type the URL in and join that way.
|
04-10-08 04:32am
|
