| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Depends on the model.
|
07-27-13 09:40pm
|
Review
27
|
DDF Network
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+Lots of movies (over 11,000), most exclusive
+Great model variety
+Great scene variety
+Easy to find niches
+Lots of updates |
| Cons: |
-Files are huge (~1.5GB per 20 minutes)
-In general, only about 1.5 years full HD, 3(ish) in 720
-Search features work, but not impressive
-(Minor)Sometimes, updates can be too similar, leaving you with a day without any new updates of interest |
| Bottom Line: |
The pros:
+This site has a ton of videos since they have been around for a long while. I say most exclusive because a few of the videos I came across were also on some other sites. Nothing really more to add here.
+This site has 13 major niche sites and the model variety to populate them. Most of the girls are European, but they range from the tight and skinny to voluptuous to plump. Needless to say, most of the girls are good looking. Many of them are the popular models that can be found on many other sites, so if you have found girls you like somewhere else, there is a good chance they have a few scenes here.
+As with the girls, the multitude of niches provide a good variety of scenes. While they have a Taboo site, it is not too intense and features peeing, whipping, bondage and some machines, but nothing too extreme. The big boob site is mostly real boobs, which is nice to me. They also have their versions of Glamcore in both bg and gg.
+Each nice has its own site, so it is typically easy to find a lot of videos that you want to see. Most of the niches have at least a few videos that can interest everyone
+There are at least 3-4 updates daily, so there is a ton of new content.
The cons:
-I know space is cheap, but these files get very big very fast. Some of the longer (35-40 minute) videos would get up to 4GB
-There are "only" about 1,500 full HD videos, which equates to about a year and a half, so browsing historical videos can quickly get you to 720 or less. It is surprising that a site this big took so long to get to HD.
-The search features have checkboxes to allow you to filter the videos and/or girls, but there were times that I felt (or even found through other means) scenes that met the criteria but did not appear in the search results. Oftentimes, I found myself going to the site that would be the closest match and then perusing the update history to find scenes that I may like.
-This is a minor complaint, but there were a few times where I would get 4 updates and they would all be along the same vein or days without at least one bg intercourse scene. This is something mainly to me, as I like having new variety every date and it is not necessarily their job to provide it.
Overall, I feel this is a very good site. Thee content merits a very high score, despite the limited HD, but the site design and functionality (which they are improving) brings this to be "Very Good" instead of "Excellent" |
|
07-27-13 09:39pm
Replies (6)
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
For the power and flexibility, it is hard to beat a desktop
|
05-15-13 08:18pm
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't mind, so long as there is a good idea of what you are getting.
|
05-13-13 10:20pm
|
Comment
30
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
|
05-12-13 08:47pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
31
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Review
Thanks for the review. Hearing all these good things is making me think that it might be worth joining despite their horrible privacy practices.
|
05-11-13 09:41pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Give ads their own page. If I am paying for a site, I should be able to avoid the ads.
|
05-11-13 09:35pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I picked other because I doubt that most women are interested in porn.
|
05-10-13 08:46pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
Just...no...
|
05-07-13 09:28pm
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It can be helpful, but things change so often, so I do not often look.
|
05-05-13 08:19pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I like everything. I have an e-reader, which is especially great for travel or getting great deals on books. Online is always nice for the variety. Audiobooks are great for travel. Magazines are great for catching up on the hobbies.
I will say that there is nothing better than having a physical book to read. I especially love being able to flip to a favorite part quickly and easily.
|
05-03-13 08:38pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Too lazy. Plus a lot of sites now use the in-frame ads as opposed to the pop-ups, so why bother?
|
05-02-13 08:53pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Usually barefoot, just make sure it makes sense.
Never, ever clown shoes.
|
04-29-13 07:24pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
It is a mixed bag. Some have been good and quick, others just ignored the request.
|
04-27-13 08:03pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I tend to move on from the ones who look too young. Once I feel the need to re-check the 2257, it kinda ruins it for me.
|
04-26-13 06:57pm
|
Reply
41
|
Wow Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Thanks for the info!
Not to seem too dense, but does it work the other way? If someone joins Wow, do they get Diesel?
|
04-25-13 09:27pm
|
Review
42
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Gorgeous women (over 3000 models)
-Great sex variety (over 10,500 scenes, most exclusive)
-Great variety in women
-Scenes well-shot
-Files reasonably-sized and look great in 1080p
-At least 1 update per day
-No download limits
-No DRM |
| Cons: |
-Nonsensical file naming
-Navigation is a mixed bag
-Scene search could be better
-Very few "American" scenes in HD (not necessarily a con to me but could be for some) |
| Bottom Line: |
Simply put, 21sextury knows how to make good porn but not how to distribute it.
Pros:
-This site has more gorgeous women than several other sites combined. There is definitely a more Euro focus, but if you like models who are on the thinner side while still having breasts, then this is the place for you. Sometimes, a search of their "chubby" models can be humorous, since some of them could be considered slightly overweight at worst. They do have several of the more popular "American" models (i.e. Gianna Michaels, Faye Reagan) but they tend to be on the bonus sights which are typically only in 480 resolution.
-Though there is a bit of a Euro focus, there is still a lot of variety in the women. They have women ranging from super-thin to the ultra-voluptuous. Many of the women fall in the "athletic" body type, but there is variety in looks (be it hair, breasts, face, etc.) that prevents me from feeling like I am looking at a bunch of clones.
-Most of the videos since 2010 (maybe a little earlier) are 1080, and there is quite a bit of 720 from the years before that. The file sizes are quite reasonable, with a 20 minute video coming in around 900MB
-The videos are well-shot. They tend to set everything up so the model is the main focus, and keep the angles and positions varied throughout.
-There is great sexual variety on this site. Even without subscribing to 21sextreme, this site provides a wide array of sex, even into the kinky categories. Most scenes contain anal in some aspect, but there are a number of hardcore scenes that are vaginal-only. While this may be my opinion and sound odd, the anal is not often treated as "special," and by that I mean that they do not make it a big deal, say "here we go!" or have an upping of the ante to be more aggressive when anal happens; it is simply another hole. There are plenty of DP's and quite a few, though not as many, BGG scenes. If you are not in the mood for hardcore, there are plenty of lesbian and solo videos. NudeFightClub is a different take on the lesbian scenes, as there is only about 5-10 minutes of sex at the end with a majority of the video focusing on them rolling around and pulling each others' clothes off with a minimal degree of aggressiveness.
-The site provides at least one, but typically 2 updates per day.
-The site download speeds are good, there are no download limits, and there is no DRM attached to the file.
Cons:
-The file names are all in some code that makes sense only to them. Renaming files is necessary for future reference. Personally, I found it easy to add downloaded scenes to my favorites to make sure I did not download them twice and/or could remember the name and model.
-The site navigation, while not horrible, still has plenty of room to improve. When you look at a model's scene history, they are in a seemingly random order and it can be annoying to find her most recent scenes. Sometimes filters do not reset even after you click the option, leave the page, and come back.
-While tied to the navigation, the scene search became an annoyance. Originally, they had over 100 options, as well as the ability to search just about anything and in full combination (anal scene, outdoors, long brown-haired model with trimmed bush and medium pear-shaped breasts could be searched and you would still have options) and then they removed it to more generic categories. I find it ironic that they went from more detailed to less, especially when they already had the details in the system.
-If you like the more traditional American porn, there are few scenes and fewer still in any kind of HD. This does not bother me, but anyone looking for this would be better served elsewhere.
All in all, I was a member for a month longer than originally planned and was still finding new and intriguing models and scenes. I have no reservations about joining again in the future, as the girls, sex, and presentation are all top notch. Even the cons are more annoyances that can easily be worked around and do not ruin the experience.
I give this site a solid recommendation and the rating will only increase as the navigation improves. |
|
04-25-13 09:01pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
43
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
|
04-19-13 10:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
44
|
Naughty America
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Lots of different models
-Plenty of categories to choose from (~80)
-Tons of scenes (over 5000)
-Daily updates
-Camerawork is well done |
| Cons: |
-Not a lot of variety in models (see below)
-Scenes are not too varied (see below)
-Sort functions are limited
-Videos are only 720 and can be big
-Natural, balanced models can be hard to find in recent updates
-Ads every time you are logged in |
| Bottom Line: |
To go into some more detail about my (seemingly) conflicting pros and cons:
-There are a lot (almost 2000) of models on this site. However, especially more recently, they seem to be either a fake-breasted "MILF-ish" variety, super slim 18-year old, or big-asses. As always, there are exceptions, but they seem few and far between.
-There is the ability to select a lot of different categories, but there is no ability to perform combinations. The site only allows a type of scene, type of model and location combination. So, if you want "Brown Eyes" and "POV" you are out of luck.
-There are a ton of scenes to select and many sites to choose from. However, most of the scenes follow a standard format of: build a brief story, remove clothes, oral, few positions, cumshot. It is hard to describe, as that is porn in a nutshell, but there are times when the positions, order, and general happenings feel nearly identical between the scenes, especially when on the same sub-site (of which there are 37, raging from MILFs to Teens).
Pros:
-There are typically 2-3 updates per day
-The camerawork and overall presentation of the videos was well done. While I felt that there was some tedium in the action, I appreciated the angles and framing that they used. I never felt that they stuck with a view too long, especially extreme closeups or extreme angles that I personally find tiresome.
To elaborate on my cons:
-The HD videos are only 720 instead of the 1080 available on many other sites. A few of the videos were very large, especially for the length of video (1GB for 22 mins).
-There seems to be a lack of models who are thin and/or athletic and have breasts (even moderately-sized ones). I kept getting the feeling that most of the C and above size breasts were silicone or on a "thicker" model. While I do not mind that every once in a while, I felt there were too few models to fit this gap in their offering.
-There as a popup ad after each login that had to be closed and was quite annoying.
Maybe a con for some:
-There is not a lot of harder material if you are into that. There are only 4 DP scenes and only about 340 anal scenes, so people who like a little more than b/g or g/g might find the content lacking.
Overall, I bough a month membership when it was on sale and did not regret my purchase. I enjoyed the month on the site, but I had reached my fill by the end of the month. I would recommend the site if you want to sign up for a month on sale, but I plan on check out their direct competitors (RK, Bangbros, NA) before signing up again. |
|
04-07-13 10:56pm
Replies (5)
|
|
