| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Nope I haven't.
I've thought about it a few times, but I don't know where I'd keep it, and the cleanup sounds like a real pain.
I'll still probably try one at some point though.
Shame I don't have anything to compare it to yet!
|
07-14-07 10:39am
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I wouldn't say it's too restrictive. I'm usually able to fit in all the information I'd like for a fairly detailed review.
Only thing is, I sometimes like to insert a line break to separate different things I'm talking about, and sometimes find my self having to take these out.
|
07-14-07 10:38am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I can't say I have a favourite reviewer.
It's nice to have 4 different takes on a site, even though most of the time they're all of the same general consensus. By having more reviewers, there are usually more pros/cons listed.
Monahans post pretty much sums up my opinion.
|
07-14-07 10:36am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Yes I guess it does.
If I give someone a "No" vote because I feel that they've for example reviewed a site based only on the information avialable on the tour pages, and hasn't actually joined the site, they could give me a "No" vote simply because I gave them one.
Presumably this is something that should be avoided, as the "No" vote that they cast wasn't based on my reviews, but simply a response to my "No" vote for them.
By not allowing anonymous "No" votes, people have to provide a reason, but if the reasons were also approved by an admin, it could possibly avoid someone voting "No" for the reason that "You gave me a No vote!"
I'm not saying that the admin has to agree with the persons no vote, but there would probably be some completely un-called for No votes out of spite, that modering the votes could possibly avoid.
Hope that helps!
|
07-14-07 10:31am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, I think so.
Anonymous "Yes" votes are okay, but anyone who votes "No" should be required to provide a reason why. The reasons should also be moderated.
This would allow people to view why they got a no vote and possibly improve their reviews accordingly, and would reduce the chance of someone voting "No" just because you voted "No" for them.
|
07-14-07 04:34am
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I use Windows Media Player for most things, and if I have a file that won't play because it needs a special codec, rather than installing the codec and playing the file in WMP, I just open it in GOM Player.
Saves having to install loads of codecs, and from my experience, GOM is better than VLC.
|
07-13-07 02:37am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
It's not a deal breaker, but I'd prefer to watch scenes without condoms.
|
07-13-07 02:36am
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've bought some stuff once.
But unfortunately I still live with parents, so it's kinda risky lol.
|
07-13-07 02:34am
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Cable.
I'm on Virgin Media (UK), currently 10Mb downloads.
Should be upgraded to 20Mb in August however, can't wait.
|
07-13-07 02:34am
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I put it on my iPod once, but the novelty soon wore off.
Much more fun watching it on the PC.
|
07-13-07 02:33am
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope, because I use a separate email account for porn sites than my regular one. It's one that I don't check so wouldn't pickup the newsletters anyway.
|
07-13-07 02:32am
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I don't mind at all as long as both the boy/girl are enjoying themselves, and more importantly each other.
|
07-13-07 02:32am
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
IE7.
I used to use Firefox when IE6 was the latest, but now that IE7 has tabbed browsing, I just use that.
|
07-13-07 02:31am
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
WMV, because it's simple.
It just plays, no need to install players (eg Quicktime) that I'd rather not install on the PC, or have to fiddle about with codecs.
I use WMP for playing music anyway, so it's the natural choice.
|
07-13-07 02:30am
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most evenings to check out the new content.
|
07-13-07 02:29am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually think about it for a few days, then when I'm in the mood for porn I join a site on impulse.
Then I sometimes regret it afterwards, until the next evening hehe.
|
07-13-07 02:29am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
If the site has a good review either here or at TBP, then yeah I'd trust the tour pages.
Otherwise, I'd be weary without reading reviews.
|
07-13-07 02:28am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definately.
It helps demonstrate how regular the updates are, and if you're like me, it helps me keep the porn organised after I've downloaded it to the HDD.
|
07-13-07 02:27am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Friends, occaisonly - not awkward at all.
But wouldn't talk about it with co-workers.
|
07-13-07 02:26am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've joined a few sites for a year's membership in one go (Sapphic Erotica) in the past.
And probably the only site's I've let the rebill happen for would be Videobox and Abby Winters.
|
07-13-07 02:25am
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Definately.
I think if theres a site (as there are many) that no longer update, but have a lot of content, they should make this clear before signing up.
People expect to see regular updates.
|
07-13-07 02:24am
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Occaisonly, but only quietly as the neighbours will hear!
I usually just plug in some headphones though.
|
07-13-07 02:23am
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hmm, either separate it from all the high quality content so when someone joins a site and downloads all the regular videos, they're all of high quality - but he/she has to choose to download the lower quality ones.
Remastering it would be good also, but many sites wouldn't do this as they'd focus more on adding new content rather than taking up more space with their old content.
|
07-13-07 02:23am
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yeah, I can understand why.
I confess to downloading loads in the first month then usually cancelling my rebill so from the webmasters point of view, it's logical.
|
07-13-07 02:21am
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surfingman's Poll
Not really. It can be okay if it's not distracting and is fairly quiet compared to the moans of the girls.
But really, no music is probably best.
|
07-13-07 02:20am
|
