| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Absolutely! It's a pleasure to come across even a modicum of customer service in an industry known for anything but.
|
03-26-17 04:37am
|
Reply
102
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Absolutely! It's a pleasure to come across even a modicum of customer service in an industry known for anything but.
|
03-26-17 04:37am
|
Reply
103
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
Reply of
AV Revenue's Reply
I appreciate it. Email sent.
|
03-25-17 02:50pm
|
Reply
104
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
Reply of
AV Revenue's Reply
Thanks for responding and glad to hear the network is taking steps to improve support.
I did go the link you provided and sent a message at the time of the problem but received no response.
However, things seem to be okay now except for the extra $4.95 charge. The $29.95 charge was reversed and it's not worth the energy to fight the $4.95 charge.
|
03-25-17 11:12am
|
Reply
105
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I think most of us will agree that Epoch and CCBill are the gold standard. Unfortunately, we don't always have options.
Japan HDV uses 3 processors, something I never saw before. I never experienced a site that uses different processors give the user an option which one to use, but then again, I haven't been around the block as much as you. One has to play games to get to use the processor of choice, like put in incorrect credit card info with a processor that you don't want to use and hope it defaults to the preferred credit card processor. I wonder what the rationale is behind this.
In my case, I wasn't paying attention to the credit card processor being used and simply accepted the default. My bad and I'm paying for my mistake, if not monetarily then with a waste of time dealing with this now. I have to think most users don't pay attention all that much to credit card processors. This group happens to be a savvy bunch and we make a big deal about processors as we should.
On the plus side, for me anyway, I never lost a nickel. I have no issue disputing a charge with my bank. I've always prevailed in disputes and never had it backfire on me by being blacklisted anywhere. I also find that once you threaten a site or credit card processor with a dispute, they generally back off. I'm guessing that's because they don't want to lose their processing privileges.
|
03-23-17 03:37pm
|
Comment
106
|
Japan HDV
(0)
|
|
03-23-17 03:49am
Replies (10)
|
Reply
107
|
DOMAI
(0)
|
Reply of
LadyLover's Review
"What? You can’t post updates on the weekend?"
Haha.
Not my thing but i enjoyed the review. Thanks for the post.
|
03-17-17 05:12am
|
Reply
108
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
tomtom1983's Reply
If you paid by debit/credit card, I would threaten to dispute. Just the mere threat of a dispute is generally enough to persuade a processor to issue a refund. At least that's been my experience. My guess is that the processor knows they're gonna lose and they are jeopardizing their status with the credit card companies, i.e., Visa Int'l or Visa USA.
I have gone through with a dispute a few times and I've always prevailed and gotten my money back. Other members say that this may cause problems in the future by getting blacklisted. I've never had such a problem.
|
03-10-17 03:05am
|
Reply
109
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I just got a chance to watch some of the videos I downloaded. It should probably come as on surprise that the site is also guilty of recycling. That is, putting current dates on old uploads. Coupled with the misleading and disgusting name of the site, this group is among the king of sleazies.
|
03-07-17 01:57pm
|
Reply
110
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I agree, this was one of the better reviews on PU. Sure thing for a raffle winner so I'll lay off this week. ;)
Question: The TBP review from 2015 is somewhat contrary to your review regarding hard sex. Can you comment? The following is an excerpt:
"The content here may not be for everyone, the bulk of it, at least. Out of the total number of scenes 1,939 of them are mere interviews up to the 12 or so minute mark before there might be something like nudity, pussy spreading, or possibly some pussy play. If you're the type who really likes to get to know your models before they might be seen later in a hardcore shoot, go for it, but just know that's what you can expect from the bulk of the sites content."
|
03-07-17 11:46am
|
Comment
111
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
|
03-05-17 10:37am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
112
|
21 Naturals
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
I believe you! I once got pissed at Khan in my early days for not including a review that basically said the site sucks, haha.
I've seen comments by some of the old timers that they lost their motivation to comment on newbie reviews and I understand that. It's so commonplace. I feel the same, though once in a while I say something.
I stick to my guns though about a standardized review. So many other sites have it and it seems to work well. It doesn't need to be rigid and can continue to encourage free-flow thoughts. However, necessary info to allow someone to make a judgment about whether to join should be there. Simple stuff like whether the site is streaming only, video quality, number of scenes, etc. One of my pet peeves is that reviewers often don't report on the nature of the content, though sometimes it's obvious from the site name. Other times, not.
One of the major arguments against standardized reviews is that reviewers only need to review the guidelines about reviews. In a perfect world, that might work, but realistically, how many people read guidelines?
One of these decades all you naysayers will see the light. ;))
|
02-28-17 01:59pm
|
Reply
113
|
21 Naturals
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Thank you!
I wasn't entirely serious, though it really does irk me to see newcomers with unhelpful reviews getting such merit.
However, I really don't think such a distinction is necessary. One can tell from reading a review whether it's reliable and/or helpful.
I know this is never gonna happen, but formatted or semi-formatted reviews that more or less force a reviewer to include certain information would go a long way to helping the quality of reviews. I think newcomers need this structure and I speak for myself when I was a newbie. But alas, this idea has been discussed and tossed in the trash bin.
|
02-28-17 03:56am
|
Reply
114
|
21 Naturals
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Not to digress, but I want more trust badges! I have 1 lousy badge, always one of the minute irksome things in my life, haha.
Which reminds me of the Reggie Hammond character... when asked what kind of cop he was, he responded:
You know what I am? I'm your worst fuckin' nightmare, man. I'm a nigger with a badge which means I got permission to kick your fuckin' ass whenever I feel like it!
|
02-27-17 03:19pm
|
Reply
115
|
The Tabu Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
OMG, I didn't know I'm like an open book. ;)
I joined before I saw your comment. And then I realized that I was a member in the past. I must have deleted the videos in my purge of stuff I didn't care for.
Before I go further, a few general comments on the site. Your comments were very much on target. This is a well organized site with excellent support. One of the features I like a whole lot, one that I never came across, is hovering your mouse over a video image gives you a concise summary of the video. Very helpful.
I experienced technical issues in downloading from the main site, New Sensations. It turns out they upgraded that sub-site and it wasn't possible to download -- only on that site. I received a response from support within an hour. We went back and forth in trying to fix it until it was finally fixed. The point being is that they were very responsive and eager to make things right.
I did suggest offering a PU discount. It seemed the tech guy wasn't familiar with such stuff but he thought it a good idea and is going to pass it on.
Having said that, as you intimated, the site is not for me. Too many tattoos, implants and older women. This is a matter of personal taste. Btw, I did see the video you wrote about and I agree - very hot, one of the few I liked.
|
02-22-17 04:42am
|
Reply
116
|
The Tabu Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Thanks for the informative review. However, can you please be more detailed next time? [just joking]
I'm thinking of joining. How are the other sites in the network?
|
02-21-17 12:27pm
|
Reply
117
|
Cum Filled Indian Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks for the update. I'm going to pass on the site. I have no patience for such shenanigans.
|
02-14-17 06:57am
|
Reply
118
|
Cum Filled Indian Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I was going to join and then you posted about canceling problems, bummer. If you don't mind, can you let us know what happens? I'd like to join but not if canceling is a hassle.
|
02-12-17 04:21am
|
Reply
119
|
Cum Filled Indian Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I enjoyed the review - very informative. I had no idea about the laws and customs in India regarding sex & porn. However, I did wonder why there was so little porn available shot in India.
Another negative for the site - they state you can preview videos, but when you click the play symbol, it simply takes you to the sign up page. But for 5 bucks, I suppose I'll join to get the 18 videos.
|
02-11-17 01:08pm
|
Reply
120
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I'm with you on amazon. I spend a fortune with them and am a prime member in addition to prime fresh. Too bad they have bad (presidential) politics. But let's not go there. Jet has better prices on some items and carries some things that amazon doesn't. In my limited dealings with them, their delivery has been as fast if not faster than Amazon. The concept is basically the same though Jet carries only a fraction of the items that Amazon carries. Competition is a good thing.
As to how the bank allows duplicate authorizations - it's because they're for different amounts and the bank can't distinguish that it's a duplicate. Jet initially authorizes for the entire purchase. A day later, they authorize for individual purchases. For example, I purchased 3 items in my latest order. Immediately following placing the online order, they authorized the entire amount. The next day, they authorized each item separately. The bank told me that several of the authorizations were duplicates and they rejected them (I ordered 5 cases of water and apparently they tried to authorize each case separately).
I can't fault the bank - how are they supposed to know? Being a nut when it comes to these things, I called up Visa USA and asked for clarification about Visa's rules. Talk about bureaucracy! I got nowhere. I know I know, I'm an obsessive nut when it comes to these things. ;)
|
02-09-17 07:40am
|
Reply
121
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
They need time to sharpen their pencils to write the cancellation order ;).
Not to digress.... coincidentally, I was just speaking with my bank about authorizations from jet.com - the company that aspires to be amazon.com. What a racket! It's my third time ordering from them and I keep forgetting about their ridiculous policy. They authorize all purchases twice thereby tying up available funds. The duplicate authorizations go away eventually, but that doesn't mitigate the hardship it may cause by having funds unavailable needlessly. When I questioned jet.com, I was told it was the way their system operates. Great answer! Calling my bank simply to find out if they're allowed to do this was an exercise in patience and I eventually hung up after being transferred around. I personally don't really care about the funds being unavailable - it's the principle. The experience was something out of Kafka. I don't know how they get away with it.
|
02-09-17 06:41am
|
Reply
122
|
Sperm Mania
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Regent, thanks for the review. However, in the future you might want to add a description of the content. I had to look elsewhere to get the 411.
The price was $34.95 for a month when I just peeked. Still, it seems pricey for 100 scenes.
|
02-04-17 08:55am
|
Reply
123
|
Love Wetting
(0)
|
Reply of
WDGirls's Reply
At the risk of needlessly prolonging this, I'd like to make it clear where I stand as well as others I assume.
The business model doesn't lend itself to recurring memberships. I know some members at PU don't feel the same as well as many of your customers. However, I don't get it. Nowadays, it is simple enough to download all the videos one wants in a month, three months at the most. New updates at most sites probably don't exceed 10 per month. Waving a carrot of 10 bonus videos is not sufficient to make me become a recurring member. I mean no offense and I do sympathize with your plight.
Having 10 new videos in the recurring month compared to possibly 100 or 500 at the onset doesn't make sense to continue membership until there are sufficient new uploads. I'm not going to become a recurring or loyal member simply so the business can maintain a profit margin. It would be like giving to charity.
Like I said, I know others will not agree and other people don't mind spending the monthly fee to get only a handful of new uploads monthly. If I'm missing something or not understanding, please let me know. Seriously.
|
12-21-16 11:52am
|
Reply
124
|
Love Wetting
(0)
|
Reply of
WDGirls's Reply
Webmaster, I appreciate the explanation.
|
12-21-16 05:17am
|
Reply
125
|
Love Wetting
(0)
|
Reply of
WDGirls's Reply
Webmaster, thanks for responding. However, I have to go along with RB.
I follow the same practice.... I cancel membership at all sites immediately after joining. It is rare that I need more than a month to download what I'm interested in. Why should I join for multiple months when I have what I want within a month? It doesn't make sense to me. I do not speak for all PU members, but given the way things are, I don't understand why anyone would want a recurring membership. That is, unless updates are frequent and abundant, which is rarely if ever the case. For those sites I enjoy, I will come back and rejoin after a period of time.
I understand that you're looking for loyalty in the way of recurring memberships. However, the present system doesn't support that type of loyalty, at least for me as well as many others.
Regardless, I think it's just bad business to offer something and then take it away.
|
12-20-16 01:02pm
|
