Many thanks for the prompt and detailed reply.
I should be on a limited porn budget, and constantly go over my spending limits.
So I doubt I would ever join the Team Skeet premium unlimited plan.
Also, it just makes sense to me if I join a site, I expect to get bonus sites thrown in.
Though I do join single sites (Metart, Nubile Films, etc.) that are stand-alone sites, if the content is superior.
Is this part of the basic Team Skeet network, or a premium site that you have to pay extra for, and you are paying for only access to this one site?
Second question:
Does the site use fake incest, where the father-daughter relationship is stepfather-stepdaughter, instead of "real incest", where the relationship is supposed to be father-biological-daughter?
Almost all the sites I've seen use the fake incest theme.
I don't know why. Maybe "real incest" is borderline illegal, or maybe it's illegal in some areas, and that's why the fake incest is more common.
I don't know of any site that uses the "real incest" theme.
But there are plenty of sites that use the "fake incest" theme.
Fake incest, as far as I am concerned, is where the sex is between step- relations.
I'm not talking about "real incest", which I assume is illegal.
But actors in porn who are supposedly playing "real incest" roles.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month.
-Multiple choices for payment: Credit card, paypal, checking account.
-Multiple weekly updates for the network.
-Unlimited downloads and streaming.
-All content is exclusive.
-Includes access to the Nubiles Porn network.
-Login details work for all the sites you have access to (around 18 sites).
-Videos are offered for streaming and downloads in definitions from 240p through 4K.
-You can also stream the videos in 0.25x to 2.0x speed. (I don't know why you would want to change the speed, except maybe go to slow motion if you want to examine the "good" parts.)
Cons:
-Main con this is a tiny site. 42 videos total.
-Update rate 1 or 2 videos per month. But the network has multiple weekly updates.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: young girls (18 to early twenties) are porn star princesses. They demand attention from studs who are more than happy to fill their holes with cum.
That might be too abrupt a description, because these girls are also taking care of their boyfriends needs.
Number of site videos: 42
Number of photos per photoset: 70+
The photos in a photoset are real photos.
They also have a smaller photoset of screencaps. Not sure what the reason for the screencaps is.
The photoset of photos is good quality. Worth collecting, especially when the models are very attractive.
Blake Blossom is the kind of step-sister I've always wanted: a caring, loving girl (actually a woman, she's 20 years old, but a lovely face and a body-to-die-for). When she finds her step-brother jerking off in bed, she explains that masturbating is not the way to happiness: you need to find a real girl.
Her step-brother admits he admires Blake's boobs, and she's flattered. And she offers to help her step-brother because she really cares about him. So, first she shows him her boobs, then her ass. Only because she wants to help. Her boobs are large and firm, her ass is gorgeous. And the step-brother is unable to resist putting his cock into her pussy. Blake is angry at first, because she is only trying to help her step-brother stop masturbating, but then she decides his cock feels so good inside of her that it turns into a really good ride. So she and her step-brother end up really satisfied.
Moral of the story: helping your step-brother can be a wonderful experience.
These are the kind of stories that teach you about life. In living technicolor. With some good-looking cuties.
As a side note: If you're going to masturbate, soft toilet paper and some hand cream are very helpful.
But I'm not sure if doing it in bed is a good idea.
I think sitting on a chair would make less of a mess.
Just my thinking.
But if your sister comes into the room, the bed is more comfortable than doing it on a chair.
So maybe the bed is the right place, if your sister is going to help you out with your sex education.
Bottom line:
This is a small site with a slow update rate. But the videos are excellent: crystal clear, good color, and some of the models do a great job acting in what could be stupid plots: Blake Blossom has an expressive face, a voluptous body, and you just feel like she's really enjoying herself getting fucked by her step-brother. A real sweetie.
The site needs a faster update rate. But the models are cute young girls, and they do a fine job with the silly plots. Some PU members might get annoyed because the plots are so simple, but turn off your brain and enjoy the lovely girls.
Giving the site a score of 85. Because you get the site, plus access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network.
If the simple plots turn you off, you would give the site a lower score.
Also, the small number of videos hurts. But I just enjoy them, think they are funny.
They put me in a good humor.
Which is strange: because this is porn, supposed to be hot. But the videos are amusing to watch.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-There is a hot link that allows you to skip the intro section when streaming a video.
-Unlimited streaming.
-There are plenty of attractive models. For example, Stacy Cruz, Julia Red, Zazie Skymm, Rebecca Black, Lovita Fate, Ria Sun, Misha Cross, Anna Rey, Jessica Spielberg, etc.
-The videos are crystal clear. Good lighting, good sound control, good colors, etc.
-The Zazie Skymm video at Bitches Abroad is worth the membership price by itself. She is one fantastic looking woman: lovely face, great body, alabaster skin: a wet dream come true.
Cons:
-There is a limit of 100 videos/month for downloads for the entire network (not per channel, but for the entire network).
-Slow download speeds. Download speeds can drop to 400 KB/sec, so if you're downloading a 36 minute runtime video at 720p, it can easily take 30 minutes or more, which is ridiculous.
-Videos download with the name of the model in the video, but you have to manually add the posting date, the channel, and whatever other information you need.
-I don't know why, but the download links become inactive within a few minutes after logging in to the site. I need to hit the download link to download the video and photoset (if I want the photoset downloaded) immediately upon logging in, or I have to re-start the computer to download anything.
-The channel logs you out within a short time. I've had other networks which left me logged in for hours, but this network logs me out in about 30 minutes (but logs me back in automatically, without having to enter my login details).
Bottom Line:
-Bitches Abroad is part of the Lets Doe It network. Membership in any one of the Lets Doe It channels gives you access to all the other channels in the Lets Doe It network. There are no premium channels you have to pay extra for.
Note: A few years ago, when the Lets Doe It network was called Porn Doe Premium, it used to have 40+ channels. Then they renamed it as Lets Doe It, and reduced the number of channels to around 16 channels, and split the other channels into separate networks that you have to pay extra for. In that sense, what used to be a large network became separate networks that required a lot more money to access.
So if you were a member in the old days, you might have a feeling of being cheated because you no longer have a low-cost membership that gives you access to all the channels in the PornDoe cash channels.
The channel theme for Bitches Abroad is girls who are on vacation and travelling to a different country.
And since this is a porn channel, the girls are horny and ready to fuck and suck with the first stud they meet. Not a lot of romance, just good old hardcore sex. However, since this is part of the Lets Doe It network, the girls are young (late teens, early twenties), and are attractive to fucking gorgeous.
Bitches Abroad has 100 scenes.
Runtime: 20 to 40 minutes.
Video definition: 240p to 1080p.
Unlimited streaming.
100 downloads per month for the entire network.
The photosets are tiny: 13 photos or less per photoset.
The photos in a photoset are actual photos, not screencaps, but since the photosets are a small number of photos, even if the girl is attractive, the photosets are not worth collecting.
There is a zip file for each photoset, but only in 1 definition.
This is definitely not a photography-oriented network.
The major con is that this is an archive site. The last update was Aug 23, 2018, over 2 years ago.
Which is a shame, because the models are attractive European women, and the vacation-travel idea adds a little spice to the sex. Two bodies slapping against each other tends to get tired after a while, even when one of the bodies is a good-looking women. The idea of a girl on vacation in a strange city, meeting a guy, then hooking up with the guy, makes the sex more interesting. Even if there is very little realism in the story: the girl is hot to trot, the guy is ready to fuck, and it's just wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am, but at least there's a tiny bit of plot that tries to give meaning to the sex.
-What surprises me is that even the lower definition videos look very good. I downloaded some 480p videos, and to me, they look clear and crisp. I couldn't tell the difference between the 480p videos, and the same videos in 720p or 1080p on a 32" monitor. My laptop is rated for 1080p, and the 32" monitor is new, but the 480p videos really look crisp. Maybe on a super-high definition, large screen monitor the differences in definition would be more visible, but the 480p videos look fine to me. And the 480p videos save a lot of storage space over the higher definition videos.
Actually, when I save photosets from MetArt or other fine photography sites, I normally download the small definition sets, because I can't tell the difference from the higher definition sets (the middle and highest definition sets) on my 27" or 32" monitors. Again, maybe it takes a very large, super-high definition monitor to see the difference. Or you might be able to see the difference in definition if you print the photos with a printer. But there's no sense for me to save the mid- or high-defintion photosets, because the low-definition photosets look just as crisp (when viewing as a slide-show, or a single photo. Only if I zoom in on a photo can I tell the difference between low, middle and high definiton photos. And I rarely zoom in on photos, because I'm not a professional photographer or professional artist, trying to see every detail on a photograph. My objective is to look at pretty women, not trying to study every tiny wrinkle or wart on the model's body.
I'm giving the channel a score of 88.
If they started updating the channel, the score would be higher.
Lets Doe It network has a slow update rate, and Bitches Abroad is an archive channel.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Note: It looks like the Teens Analyzed site and the 18videoz did a very recent update.
18videoz now gives you access to 16 sites, instead of the 18 sites it gave you until recently. Teens Analyzed is no longer part of the 18videoz network. This probably happened in the last few weeks.
The 18videoz site does not explain dropping the Teens Analyzed site from the network access.
I don't know if I'm considered a member of the Teens Analyzed site. Until a few weeks ago, I was a member, through my membership in 18videosz network.
PROS
-Join through the 18videoz site for $60/year. If you join through the Teens Analyzed site, you are charged $120/year. Both sites, until recently, gave you access to the same network sites.
I don't know if joining through Teens Analyzed gives you access to a few more sites or not, but in my opinion, paying a premium price for access to Teens Analyzed is not worth the extra money.
-18videoz.com network now gives you access to 16 sites.
Cons:
PROS(continued):
Until recently (within the last few weeks), you had access to 18 sites.
-Low cost site. I got a 1-year membership for $60, which is the current price for 18videoz site/network.
The current price for Teens Analyzed site (which includes the 18videoz network plus maybe a few more sites) is $120/year.
-The site and network is teen hardcore.
-Reality based porn.
-Not a lot of plot build-up. A guy and girl might tell each other hi, and then it's time to fuck. So no romance or build-up.
-Same login details work for all sites in the network you have access to.
-Video definition is mobile through 1080p.
-Site has 286 videos.
-The network gives you access to 3,278 videos.
-The content is mainly exclusive. I've only seen one video at the network that appears at competing networks.
-Customer support is Vendo. Which has a responsive live chat that is 24/7.
-Epoch is the primary biller. One of the trusted names.
-Unlimited downloads.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-They have changed the structure of the Teens Analyzed site. So I'm still unsure of how to navigate the site.
I haven't found the link to streaming videos. Maybe they will add streaming later, but for now, it appears to be dropped.
So it's much easier to download a video and watch it on my PC.
-Archive site. They advertise 2 updates per week, but the last update was November 13, 2018.
-Login and member pages are not secure. You get a popup warning from your browser that login details are open to hacking.
-Username and password are computer generated. Impossible to remember.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-A wide range of model attractiveness: there are some really cute girls, but little effort is made to present the models attractively. Except that many of the girls are really cute, and they don't need make-up or special costumes for their young beauty to shine through.
-Once in a while, you hit the login page link, and get the error message: 502 Bad Gateway.
-This is not a con of the search: but if you put in a model's name, you can find many models share the same name, so you have to check the thumbnails to see which model you are looking for.
-Default filename for videos is "fulllength-high.wmv", so you have to manually rename the files to show the model name, site name, etc.
-Once in a while your login details do not work. I assume the reason is the site is forcing members to reset their password for security purposes, instead of the password being hacked. I've had to re-set my password a few times every few months, because the old password stopped working.
-I think they updated the public page for the site. They now advertise that the network has 28 sites. However, if you count the number of sites listed, it's now 16 sites for the 18Videoz network. And the number of sites for the Teens Analyzed site is hard to determine. They also advertise that new sites are coming, but I put little faith in that claim.
-The coding for the videos is not efficient. A video file in 1080p with a runtime of 28 minutes 33 seconds takes 1.23 GB storage space. The video total bitrate is 6192kbps with a framerate of 25.00 frames/second.
BOTTOM LINE
-Site theme: First anal sex makes these teenies scream of painful pleasure.
That is the theme, but I doubt any of these girls are having anal sex for the first time.
Video runtime is usually 20 to 30 minutes.
Video definition goes from mobile to 1080p. That is for all the videos, even the earliest ones from 2012.
Maybe I was being too harsh when I said that there is no setup to the sex.
For example, one video shows a teen coughing, she calls a doctor, who shows up wearing a mask (and this was in 2012, before the Covid epidemic). He takes her temp, looks in her mouth, touches her throat, she starts stroking his arm (I guess it's different in Eastern Europe: if a doctor touches your throat, the correct response is to stroke the doctor's arm), she starts to giggle, and touches his shoulder, then starts stroking his groin (he's still wearing his doctor's clothes), then she takes off the doctor's mask, so he can suck and lick her titties, and it's time for the good old blowjob-vaginal-anal-intercourse routine.
I'm moving to Europe, where I can find some of these good-looking horny Russian babes.
I still think there is little build-up to the sex, unless you count a minute or two of a guy and girl looking at each other before the sex begins.
Actually, I'm surprised the quality of the videos is as good as it is. Many of the videos have professional camera-work (good focus, no jiggles from the camera), good lighting, an OK to a nice setting. But the main attraction is the level of attractiveness of the young, teenage models: you have some real cuties here, that you will have seen at many other sites: mainly Eastern European teen models. Teens Analyzed is one of the better sites in what used to be the 18Videoz network.
But I don't think the Teens Analyzed site is still considered part of the 18Videoz network, because it's not listed in the current listing of 18Videoz sites.
I'm giving the Teens Analyzed site a score of 69. That is very subjective.
The main objection is the membership price: $120/year is way too high.
This is an archive site. That stopped updating 2 years ago.
There are other cons:
For one, I think Teens Analyzed is no longer part of the 18Videoz network).
Another problem: they seem to have dropped the option to stream videos.
Another problem: the structure of the Teens Analyzed site is buggy: For example, the link "Bonuses" brings up a page that states "There are no such bonus There are no such bonus".
I think they are working on the structure of the site, and there are bugs that need to be fixed. The streaming option seems to have disappeared. The model listing seems to have disappeared.
I would not pay the premium membership to join this site.
I'm nominating you for Porn Supporter of the Year.
Keeping a recurring membership for a new update in 2026 is one of the most generous and heart-felt acts I've read this year.
The COVID epidemic has truly revealed which of us PU members are willing to support our favorite sites.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you join any one of the three sites: All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, or Wow Porn, you get access to all 3 sites.
-They've had a sale price for months now. $29.95 for 2-months membership, unlimited streaming and downloading. Or 1-year membership for $89.95 (recurring).
-The major attraction of the 3 sites is how attractive the models are. These teen girls are some of the most attractive models on the internet.
-Navigation is basically simple. You can search through the model listing (alphabetical or by popularity or latest addition). Or you can search by video or photoset (same listing system).
-There's a huge amount of content at the 3 sites. Both videos and photosets.
-The technical qualifications of the content is excellent. This is borderline glamcore. It's hardcore action, but not rough or over-the-top sex, not a lot of heartcore: mainly, it's girls getting off. By themselves (masturbation), with one or more other girls (lesbian), or with b/g, b/gg, or a few boys with girls.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
But the sex is straight blowjob, pussy sucking, vaginal and anal fucking.
-The models are naturally attractive teens. Very few boob jobs. Not a lot of tattoos or piercings. This is not a glamour site, the models don't wear fancy costumes, but the sets are nice and clean, whether indoors or outdoors, the stunt cocks are mainly attractive young male teens.
-The 3 sites have had 4K for years now. And they've started to remaster some of the videos to 6K resolution, for people who have very high resolution monitors.
My monitors max out at 1080p, and I normally watch and download at 720p (to save storage space, and because my older eyes can't tell the difference of higher definition videos anyway).
-You can download videos in your choice of definition from 480p through 4K. Some videos have been remastered to 6K.
-You can download the entire video, or can download selected parts of the video.
-You can download the photosets in your choice of zip definition.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Update rate is 1 video or photoset per day (that's for the 3 sites, not each site separately).
-The customer support is excellent, one of the finest I've ever dealt with. They have a live chat that is 24/7, that answers within a few minutes.
CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are basically minor. The 3 sites, or any one of them, are among the finest hardcore teen sites on the internet. Lovely models, fine technical quality of the videos and photosets, girls who put on a fine show of enjoying their bodies.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The 3 sites do have some non-exclusive content. Teen Mega World (another fine teen hardcore network) and Team Skeet have a lot of the massage videos that are posted at the Wow sites. And some other content at the Wow sites is also duplicated at Teen Mega World and 18XGirls. (18XGirls site has died, I believe.)
-Rarely, download speeds might be slow. I've had almost no problems with download speeds at their sites. But also, I don't download a lot any more, so I'm not the best expert on download speeds.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is teen girls enjoying sex. The girls are lovely. The sex is hardcore, but it's not extreme, no domination, no BDSM.
Although the girls don't wear glamour costumes, and the sets are not glamourous, the sets are clean and the videos and photosets are clear and crisp and showcase these lovely girls very well. Not a lot of makeup or glamor, but the girls are so young and naturally attractive that it's a pleasure to watch them in action. And to study those lovely bodies.
There is no blog (eliminated years ago), where members can ask questions and share talk.
There is a glitch in the navigation, where if you hit the backspace button at a member page, instead of going back one page, you instead bring up the login page.
But these are all minor glitches. The site (and 2 other sites you get with a membership) is one of the finest teen hardcore sites available. I recommend the site highly, and give it a score of 94. The models are just so fine.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month (recurring).
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 18 different sites.
-The site and the network are first class. First class in videos and photosets in technical features.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-All content is exclusive.
-Navigation is simple. Can easily change between sites. No additional re-login required.
-There are free cam shows included.
-Excellent model listing, with large thumbnail for each model.
-No download or streaming limits that I found.
-There is a simple search and an advance search. The advanced search has lots of different filters you can use.
-The quality of the photosets is excellent.
-Photosets have plenty of tags to describe the action.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in multiple definitions: 270p - 1080p.
-Photosets can be downloaded in small, medium and large definition zips (800px, 1333px, 3840px).
-This is a teen site and teen network. The models are A-list, very attractive.
Cons:
-The major con is this is a small site (19 videos and matching photosets). And it's an archive site. The last update was Apr 26, 2020. I guess the Covid epidemic shut down production.
That is a shame, because the videos and photosets are high quality, with attractive teen models.
-You get basic model information: girl's age, height, country, figure (e.g., 30B-24-33), and a fake bio that bullshit. For example, the bio for Vanna Bardot reads: "Vanna Bardot is a playful teen who loves toys, boys, and anything else that'll make her tight little pussy throb. Her puffy nipples are a perfect mouthful and her braces-filled smile is the epitome of innocence. You will love this tanned toned hottie!"
The bio is obviously fake: Vanna Bardot does not have braces. I don't know where they get the idea of innocence from, because in every video I've seen at the site and network, she's hot to trot.
My guess is they make up the bios without examining any of the site videos.
-No 4K video definition.
Bottom Line:
The site theme is teen girls who are being punished by being sent to a detention center.
That's the idea, but the videos and photosets only show a slight hint that the girls are at a detention center. They might sometimes wear an orange outfit, but that's about it. But the girls also wear tiny cut-off jeans, with g-string underwear, crop-top halters, for variety.
The holding cell for a girl is a large-sized bedroom, with a king-sized bed and the bedroom looks more like a nice motel room than a prison cell. You see framed photographs on the walls, nice nightstands with table lamps on either side of the bed, carpeted floors, an adjoining, individual bathroom with a toilet, large mirror, washbasin, and shower. Instead of bars, you have a doorway leading out of the bedroom that is not locked.
I guess the girls are supposed to be at high-class detention centers.
The only way to tell this is supposed to be a detention center is the site title, and the orange uniform some of the girls put on some of the time.
Some of the girls even have a pink teddy bear on their bed.
The sex is guy/girl, girl/girl, group with two or more girls, group with two or more girls with a guy, whatever.
The guards don't wear prison type clothes, but regular street clothes.
How do you know they are guards?
Because they tell the girls the girls are being bad. The girls are so horny they want to fuck. And the guards are willing to fuck the girls, after the girls plead to be fucked.
Or else, the girls try to get satisfaction with other girls (lesbian action).
In other words, the plots are basic or non-existent. "I'm horny, fuck me," says an attractive girl.
"No, don't be stupid," says the guard. "Please, I want you," says the girl.
"Well, all right," says the guard.
And they have sex.
Before the girl has sex with the guard, she might have sex with her pink teddy bear (to show you how horny she is).
Neither the script or the model has been nomimated for an academy award, or even for a Porn Star award, as far as I can tell.
I'm giving the site a score of 72.
The girls are attractive, the videos and photosets are good to excellent quality, the technical features of the site are fine. The problem is this is a small archive site with limited content.
However, you get access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network, which is 18 teen sites in all. The technical features of the network are excellent. But problem with the network is that the themes are "reality-based porn" that is so simple it's stupid. Instead of calling this "reality porn", I would say it's really a 12-year-old male's fantasy of what porn girls are like: attractive young girls who just want to have sex. There is no extreme, hardcore porn action, no domination or BDSM, just clean sex with horny young girls who want to be satisfied.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
INTRODUCTION:
This review is based on the Peter North channel of the Adult Time network.
If you subscribe to the Adult Time network, you get the Peter North channel.
If subscribe directly to the Peter North site, you are supposed to get access to the Adult Time network.
One problem: sometimes, when you join a site, you don't get everything that is advertised. It happens, and it can be frustrating.
A different problem: the Adult Time channel for a site can be very different from a subscription to the original site. The Adult Time channel might be a condensed version of the original site, with fewer videos, fewer photos in a photoset, less definition options for streaming or downloading videos and photosets, and other differences.
PROS(START OF):
-Peter North is a legend in the porn industry. Famous for his stamina and cum shots.
-The Peter North channel lists 3336 videos for the Peter North channel. So there is plenty of content at the channel.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
With access the Adult Time network, you are supposed to get 8 video updates per day, which is a huge amount of updates.
-There is often a brief setup to the sex, but it's very minimal. Most of the video is straight, hardcore sucking, fucking, etc.
CONS(START OF):
-The Peter North channel (and site) stopped updating around May 2018.
Even before the updates stopped, Peter North himself was becoming less active in front of the camera.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The earliest videos start around December 2006, and are only available in 240p and 480p.
Even some videos posted in 2018 can have a max definition of 480p.
But other videos posted in 2018 can have a max definition of 1080p.
-The models are mainly white. Ages range from late teens to around 30.
A lot of the models have breast implants. Plenty of tattoos.
Older videos max out at 480p, and the technical features can be poor:
-Any glamour site has better-looking models.
Bottom Line:
These options relate to a sub to the Peter North site:
These options can change very fast. So check what the options are, before you choose your membership plan:
Streaming only - 3 Days period. $1.00 charge.
Streaming only - 30 Days period. $14.95/month.
Streaming + downloads - 30 days period. $24.95/month.
Streaming + downloads - 365 days period. $95.40/year.
-They advertise the following:
Access to over 25 sites
18,000+ Scenes
Multiple Daily Updates
Unlimited Streaming & Downloads
Peter North is part of what used to be called the Fame Digital network. Which used to be a separate network of 20+ sites.
The Fame Digital network became part of the Adult Time network in 2018. As part of the Adult Time network, you have access to over 250 channels, over 52,000 videos, and 8 updates daily.
I don't know why they advertise that when you join Peter North, you get access to 18,000+ scenes:
You are supposed to get access to the Adult Time network, which has over 52,000 videos.
Maybe it's a case of copywriters covering a single niche, without knowing what the overall picture: the overall picture is that when you join Peter North, you are supposed to get access to the entire Adult Time network, not just access to the old network that Peter North was part of.
I get access to the Adult Time network because I joined through 21 Sextury.
21 Sextury is a network that used to include over 20 separate sites.
But in 1998, 21 Sextury was folded into the Adult Time network.
Late in 1998, joining 21 Sextury sometimes gave you access to the Adult Time network (on a random basis).
Then, early 1999, joining 21 Sextury gave everyone access to the Adult Time network.
(That was the theory, and what was advertised. But one PU member who joined 21 Sextury back then, and saw it advertised that he would get access to Adult Time, did not get access to Adult Time. This was one of those times when a network promised something, and did not follow through with its promise.)
But this is now October 2020, and I assume that almost all members who join a site that advertises access to Adult Time get access.
The main point is: Access to the Adult Time network is usually the main value of joining any sub-network in the Adult Time network.
I'm giving the Peter North channel a score of 79.
The main advantage of the Peter North channel is that it gives you access to the Adult Time network, which has a huge catalog of very good hardcore videos that cover a wide range of niches.
Note: I reviewed the Peter North channel in 04-17-19 and gave it a score of 95.
The high score was because I was really rating the Adult Time network access, which I thought was one of the best bargains in porn.
Today's review focuses more on the Peter North channel, which is one of the poorer choices in the Adult Time network.
That's why my score dropped so dramatically.
Also, I was just getting used to the Adult Time network, and was impressed.
Since then, I am still impressed by the Adult Time network, but would drop my score for the Adult Time network to maybe 90+.
You must be thinking of tangub (or maybe pinkerton), because they are both based in the UK.
I'm in Southern California, can't stand brandy, and if I started saying "spot on" people would look at me even more strangely than they do already.
But I think there's a complement hidden in your remark. Just having to dig to find the meaning.
Thankfully, TMW is a large network, and there are plenty of other TMW sites that I can review.
That's one reason I maintain a long-term membership at the network.
Besides enjoying the content of the network, of course.
Stay well.
You replies are useful.
They tell me that someone is reading my reviews.
Which is positive feedback for me.
I mean that seriously, by the way.
I do admire the review you did on Digital Desire.
It was one of the finest reviews since Shen posted his first two reviews.
Actually, looking over your past reviews, they all seem good to excellent.
So it's unfair to hold me to your writing standards.
I'm just trying to get along. Maybe win a few prizes.
I agree my review is very long.
I put in a lot of extra information or thoughts about issues that were not usually covered in a site review.
The issue of copyright, for example.
I think it's misleading for MetArt to say if you buy the Staff Selection you own it.
You don't own it. MetArt owns it, even if you "buy" the selection.
Copyright infringement is not normally covered in a review, but it's more or less understood by the PU community.
Except that if you get caught up in a lawsuit, it can get very expensive.
PU members would probably not be as exposed to shaming as "straight" non-members.
But for the relatively few people who are targeted, it can be a serious issue.
Even if the target people did not consciously share porn illegally.
But I should make more of an effort to slim down my reviews, and make them conform more to the standard PU review.
REVIEW CONTINUES:
And a host of other features/specifications to make the member pages format to your choice.
You also get 4,510 galleries, with 806 models. The models are almost all white Eastern Europeans, so there is not much variety in race or body type or age. The normal debut age for the models is 18 to early twenties, but a few models can last into their thirties. And the models normally range from attractive to lovely. Not a lot of tattoos. (Most MetArt sites photoshop erase almost all tattoos of each model from their photosets. That's the way it was since MetArt started, around 2000. But slowly the MetArt sites are starting to allow some models to show some of their tattoos in the photosets. In the videos, it's more difficult to erase tattoos, so a model's tattoos are more evident.
Technically, the Errotica Archives is first-class.
You get a large number of galleries, with attractive models.
The site is easy to navigate.
Streaming and downloading is good.
Note: I can get download speeds of 20MB/s at the site, which is the fastest download speed I've ever gotten at any site.
The films can download definitions from 270p - 1080p. That's because they stopped posting films to the site around June 2018. (I'm excluding the Staff Selection films, which are still being updated occassionally and can have a highest definition of 4K.)
Note: The Staff Selection items are a different breed of item. Not only do you have to pay extra to view and download these items, but these items are not exclusive to any one site in the MetArt network: instead, a Staff Selection item can be access from any site in the MetArt network. The same Staff Selection item can be accessed at MetArt, the Errotica Archives, SexArt, and all the other sites in the network. The content is exclusive to the MetArt network, but it's part of the network, not exclusive to any one site in the network.
What sets Errotica Archives apart from MetArt?
Basically, nothing. Errotica Archives is like a junior edition of MetArt.
You have fewer photosets, fewer videos, fewer models, fewer contributing photographers, fewer updates.
Based on those factors, Errotica Archives is a junior version of MetArt.
Any photosets or films could be posted at either site, with no problem.
If you have limited funds, I would recommend joining MetArt, which has far more content, for the same membership price.
Having said that, I think that Errotica Archives is still a worthwhile join.
But I also think that MPL Studios, Femjoy, Watch4Beauty, and some other fine glamour photography sites are also worthwhile joins. The internet offers the porn consumer a lot of fine choices.
I'm giving Errotica Archives a score of 89. I think that, for the same price, MetArt gives you the same ease of navigation, the same excellent quality, and far more content.
"Owning" a staff selection does not mean you really own it. The copyright still belongs to the MetArt network (or whatever legal mechanism they are using). They say you "own" the staff selection video if you buy it, but your use is legally limited to viewing it on your personal devices. Legally, you can't send a copy to a friend or business partner, or upload the video to a commercial internet site. So it's really deceptive advertising to write that you "own" a video if you purchase it. You are really buying to right to download it to your own personal devices (computer, cell phone, whatever). Which is the same rights you have to the normal photosets and videos at the site and network. In simple terms, you have the right to view and download the photosets and videos to your peronal devices, but the legal ownership remains with the MetArt network.
Normally, ownership doesn't matter very much.
But in the past, the owners of one porn site made it a business to sue individuals that downloaded copies of photosets and videos from pirate sites.
They would sue thousands of private individuals for over $1 millon each since around 2012.
The sued individuals would have to hire lawyers and face exposure of a porn-related federal suit.
In one 3-year period, the porn company sued over 2,000 individuals.
The issue can get very complicated: but one factor is that the individual being sued might not have downloaded the copyrighted porn content: It's very common for neighbors to hack into a private individuals' WiFi.
Also, with some programs, you might be unknowingly sharing files with other people. Opening yourself to the charge of copyright infringement.
Even though it seems to be a rare event, if it happens to you, it can mess up your life: financially and socially. And a lot of people, even if they were innocent of porn copyright infringement, pay thousands of dollars to avoid the embarrassment of a porn-related lawsuit.
Errotica Archives Overview: Errotica Archives is a member of the MetArt network.
As such, it follows the same model as most of the network sites:
You get an excellent site in terms of technical features:
-Https for login and member pages.
-Good to excellent site navigation. Easy to navigate. Excellent search engine.
You can set the page display options to your own preference:
Resolution: low, medium, high
Comments: show or hide
Number of thumbnails per page: 20-1000
Number of search results: 30-720
Sort films by latest, top rated, etc.
Set slide show interval: 2 seconds-20 seconds
Measurements: imperial or metric
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discount of $19.99/month recurring. However, look for holiday specials where the price can drop to $10 for the first month, or even lower. As a member of the MetArt network, I found an offer for $4.99 for the first month, rebilling monthly at $19.99.
-Customer service is 24/7. One of the best customer services for any porn site. The only one better is the fame aid customer service, which has a live chat line that is 24/7, and answers questions within minutes. The MetArt customer service usually answers questions within a few hours, by email.
-The content is exclusive. Note: Staff Selections are exclusive to the MetArt network, but not to any one site in the network. Staff Selections are a premium item that has to be purchased separate from your regular membership.
-The models are mainly white, Eastern European. Most of the models are familiar from the other MetArt network sites. The models range from attractive to lovely. This is one of the strengths of the MetArt network:
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
how attractive the models are: however, the competing sites, like MPL Studios, Femjoy, Watch4Beauty and other fine photo sites also have a strong catalog of lovely models.
-On the initial signup to any of the sites in the MetArt network, you are offered a chance to sign up to different sites in the network for $19/month, $90/year, $400 for a lifetime membership.
If you are a real fan of one of the sites, one of those offers might be worth considering.
However:
-On a personal level, a lifetime membership is not worthwhile for me. On a realistic basis, since my health is not good, and I'm over 70, even $400 is not a worthwhile investment. I do have a lifetime membership to MetArt and a couple of other MetArt sites, that I paid for years ago.
If you're much younger, and you really enjoy one of these sites, a lifetime membership for $400 might be worth considering. Especially to MetArt, which has a massive catalog of photosets, a daily update rate of 4 sets,
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
plus 6 sets on the first day of each month. MetArt, because of the massive catalog of photosets (and a large collection of videos, most of those videos are boring, in spite of how attractive the model might be), the large update rate, the fine technical features of the site (offering zip files in 3 definitions for each gallery, a good photoplayer to watch a gallery online, 24/7 excellent customer service, clean navigation, etc.) is the best site in the MetArt network. However, it's a softcore glamour site, emphasizing photos, which might be too bland, not hard-core enough for some PU members.
There was an announcement at the MetArt network:
30 Apr, 2020
Attention Lifetime Members, we have retroactively upgraded your lifetime membership to grant you full access to all Staff Selections.
If you carry a lifetime membership, you can now stream or download all past and future Staff Selections.
I'm a lifetime member to MetArt, SexArt, and The Life Erotic.
However, on a practical basis, access to Staff Selections doesn't hold a lot of value for me.
I don't think the Staff Selections are rare jewels compared to the normal updates at these sites.
That's my opinion, anyway.
I never paid to view or download any previous staff selections.
And I think the staff selections are basically hype, which I don't buy into.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. The last time I joined (about 1 year ago) they didn't have a pre-checked cross-sale, but this time they did. Pre-checked cross-sales are common for the porn industry, but I believe they are a poor marketing gimmick. If you miss the cross-sale notice, you will be signed up to a short term trial that can turn into a very expensive monthly membership unless you cancel the trial almost immediately.
-Also I unchecked the remember me box. This allows the site to keep your credit card data. Too many sites have been hacked for financial information. So it's a bad idea to leave your credit card information at too many sites, because you are just increasing the chances your credit cards will be hacked. I've had several credit cards accounts hacked over the years, with charges made to the accounts from fraudsters. Some charges were made from Africa, some from states in the United States I've never visited. I've never been to Africa. Credit card fraud it pervasive. Try to reduce the places that keep your credit card details.
-I got a confirming email on signup. This was important.
The confirming email was poor.
It confirmed that my account was active with Errotica Archives.
The confirming email did not show the membership price for the first month, or the montly rebill price.
The email did not name the biller for the transaction.
The signup page showed "ECHST.NET 866-452-5108".
From Google, ECHST.NET is a payment processor.
However, the member page at the Errotica-Archives site states my payment processor is RocketGate.
CCBill and Epoch are the gold standards of payment processors.
It would have been nice if I had been able to choose the payment processor.
The member page at the Errotica-Archives site does not show the monthly membership price, either the first or succeeding months.
Separately, the confirming email was important:
On the join page when signing up, you enter a password for your membership.
The password for my membership on the confirming email was a different password.
That is the first time that's ever happened to me, in over 100 porn memberships, over 20 years of porn memberships. That I was given a different password from the site, instead of the password that I entered. (The password that I entered met the stated password requirements of the site.)
You might think some of the cons are trivial. But if I hadn't gotten the confirming email, I would have had to contact customer service to try to enter the site.
And it would have been nice for the confirming email to show the last 4 digits of the credit card I used.
Along with the first and continuing monthly membership price.
-They advertise daily updates. The average update rate has been 2 updates per week for a year or more.
-Regional discrimination. PU members (outside the US) have complained that the site charges more for a membership than US members are charged. I don't know if this is due to the site or the payment processor.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Models: 806.
Galleries: 4,510
Number of photos per gallery: 50 - 100.
Contributing photographers: 73.
Photosets have a zip for low, medium and high definition.
Films: 652
This is basically a photography site. The last video update was around June 2018.
That does not include the "staff selections". They tell you if you buy a staff selection, you "own" it. But that is a marketing ploy.
There is no DRM for MetArt network sites. So you "own" all the videos and photosets at the network (except for the "staff selections").
CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:
I agree with Loki that updated model index, posting date, and search are all important.
But I mainly want easy navigation.
Https is also nice. I hate it when I see the warnings that login in not secure, the member pages are not secure, that login details are easily hacked.
I also want good to great looking videos and photosets.
And a lot of content.
And good looking models.
And some heat in the videos, would be good.
So the listing is very basic, and doesn't really cover what a site should provide.
Amount of content + Quality of content.
Versus membership price.
It's hard to score a site, either subjectively, or objectively.
So chat appears to offer something for everyones tastes.
I'm giving the TmwVRnet site a score of 85.
That is very fluid.
I don't have VR equiment to rate the VR video effects.
And watching the site videos without VR equipment gives me eye strain, and the beginning of a head-ache.
So for me personally, the site is wasted.
But I also have access to the entire TMW network, which has loads of teen oriented hardcore porn, with over 1,000 attractive teen models.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-$14.95/month discount offered by PU.
-TmwVRnet is part of the TMW (Teen Mega World) network.
With membership in any one of the sites, you get acccess to the entire network.
There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The TmwVRnet has 7 or 8 updates per month. That is the most updates, by far, of any actively updating site in the network. By update, I mean both a video and the accompanying photoset of the shoot.
-They upgraded the search engine for the site (and network). Now, when you put in a model's name in the search box, it returns her content at the network. Before, the search results were a jumbled mess, returning the model's content plus a slew of un-related content that had nothing to do with the model.
So the search function is very useful now.
-There is an excellent alphabetical listing of the models. With nice-sized thumbnails of the models that give you a clear picture of what the models look like. However, you have around 1,500 models at the network,
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
so searching through the model index would take a huge amount of time and patience. The model list is for the network. There is no model listing for each separate site.
-The models are late teens through the early 20s. Mainly white, Eastern European girls. Most speak Russian or some Eastern European language. Most of the models range from cute or attractive to very attractive.
-The posting date of the videos and photosets are displayed, so you know when the video and photoset was added.
-Navigation is simple. Both for the site and network. Can easily change between sites, without having to re-login. The model's page lists her contents at the entire network, not just for a single site.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads. A nice feature, when many sites are starting to charge extra for downloads, or limiting the amount of downloads.
-The network offers up to 5K (2700p) videos
-Zip for each photoset. But they are not worth collecting, because the quality is poor.
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
First, the photos are screencaps, and I've seen much better screen caps made from software at other porn sites. I'd guess that's partially because they were shooting for a VR video, and the software couldn't compensate for the difference from a normal film shoot. But also, the software they are using to create the photosets is not as good as the software some other porn sites are using to create photosets, because the photosets from other sites in the network is below the quality of photosets at some competing networks, especially the Wow sites. And far below the quality of the photosets at X-Art, which are probably photographs, not screen shots.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The photosets are screenshots made from some software program. The screenshots are just OK, better than the screenshots from years ago which were low-quality screenshots that were easy to recognize as screen shots. The screen shots for the last several years are better quality, but nowhere near a phtographic quality of even the lowest quality photos at photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios.
-Although the models mainly range from attractive to very attractive, there is not a wide range in age or body type or race: these are mainly white Eastern European girls of teens or early twenties. No milfs, very few Asians, Blacks or Latinos.
-Minimal information about a model is given. A model's page lists her debut age (for her first content at the network.) And that's it--except for some made-up bullshit about the model. Playboy and Penthouse back in the 1970s and 1980s made up better sounding bullshit about their centerfold models that was more believable.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Number of videos: 398
Number of photosets: 398 (photoset is made of screencaps from the video).
Number of photos per photoset: about 100
Video runtime: about 20-30 minutes.
Download choices for a sample video at the TmwVRnet site: type of file approximate file size
Oculus/Vive 3840x1920p 2.39 GB
Gear VR 2880x1440p 1.2 GB
PSVR 2880x1440p 1.03 GB
Smartphone 1920x960p 1.2 GB
MP4 1080p 588 MB
5K 5400x2700p 2.41 GB
MP4 480p 166.69 MB
For the network, on the videos posted for the last few years, I see downloads listed at 360p through 2160p (UHD).
The network started offering 1080p videos in May 2014.
Before that, the highest definition was 720p.
Videos range from 360p through the highest definition.
The network advertises that it offers 5K videos (2700p).
But I haven't found the links that downloads 5K video definition.
However, my computer equipment can only handle up to 1080p definition.
Also, since I have limited drive storage space, I normally download videos in 720p, which saves me storage space and gives me good visuals on any videos I watch.
TmwVRnet is the Virtual Reality site of the TMW network.
I don't have Virtual Reality equipment, so I can't comment on the effectiveness of the VR effect.
You can watch the videos without VR equipment, although there is a slight 3-D effect when watching a VR video at the site. Because the video was meant to be viewed as a VR video.
Actually, since I don't have VR equipment, when watching these videos, I get eye-strain. Not only does the video have a strange 3-D effect, but I start to get a headache from watching these videos.
So I'm not the primary target for these videos.
And I can't speak for how effective the VR effects are.
Unless you have VR equipment, I would guess the site has little appeal.
I'm basing that on my reaction of eye-strain from watching a few of these VR videos (in non-VR format).
Not only do these VR videos have a strange 3-D effect, but the videos give me a headache.
TMW also has live chat shows. I'm not into chat, but there appear to be over 90 live chat shows on their chat channel, which you can watch for free, or tip if you want. I don't know how they can have so many different chat shows live at the same time.
Out of the 90 live chat shows on the first page, you have:
-Most live chats are single female models
-3 chats are a single male model
-2 chats are 2 male models
-a few male-female model chats
-even fewer with a female model with 2 or more guys
-also a few with more than 1 female model and more than 1 guy
CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:
MetArt will soon offer personal video message from models.
Don't know when it will happen.
But if you're a MetArt member, you can expect personal video messages from their models.
Don't know if that is free, or will cost.
But if the video is delivered in person by the model, that would be great.
Especially if you can choose the models you want.
In my dreams.
LOL.
18 Videos has around 20 sites in the network.
You join any one, you should get access to all 20.
Most of the sites stopped updating years ago.
But some still update.
Many of the sites use the home- (or amateur) style of shooting porn.
There are some hot (good) videos at the network, if you don't mind searching for the stuff that doesn't appeal to you.
Look for a price of $60 for the year. That's the price I paid, and it's offered different times during the year.
Otherwise, you can pay a high price, while there are cheaper prices available.
I joined through 18Videoz, which usually offers the $60/year price.
But like I say, I've seen higher prices for shorter-term membership.
Since I don't download a lot anymore, download speeds don't bother me as much as for most people.
But, if I did download a lot, and the streaming speed for videos was affected, I would lower the site score significantly.
Actually, I probably rated the site score too high, because I was basing it on my personal satisfaction, instead of trying for a more objective rating.
But that is why I made a point of showing the complaints by other PU members, who certainly deserve to be mentioned.
There are some networks that seem to have real problems with download speeds. Team Skeet got a lot of complaints by PU members a while back about slow download speeds.
But when I posted that as a member of Team Skeet, I hadn't experienced slow download speeds, I was called a shill or a liar because I posted my experience at Team Skeet was different.
Sometimes PU members can be quick to criticize.
LOL.
(After the sting of criticism wears off.)
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good sized site. 181 scenes.
-High quality production standards: extensive attention to making the models as lovely as possible, expensive sets, crystal-clear videos, good sound control.
-Unlimited streaming. But limited to 100 videos per month for downloads.
-You can watch videos streaming in 240p through 1080p.
-You can download videos in 240p through 1080p (but 100 video downloads per month).
-You can hit the "Skip" link to skip the introduction to a video.
Cons:
-A few PU members have complained about slow download speeds from the site and network.
-Several PU members have complained about the 100 video/month download limit.
-At least one PU member has complained that download managers don't work well with the site or network.
You can't que up several videos and expect them to download correctly.
-Lack of variety of models: some PU members complain girls look like glamour models, too white, too slender, not enough ethnic variety or enough body types.
Note: You can't please everyone. The site (and most of the network) features attractive to lovely models, made to look gorgeous. So some people want a more natural style, where the models don't look so pretty or glamourous.
-A page of ads for other sites you have to pass through to get to the member's area. Then ads for other sites at the bottom of each member page. But a minor distraction.
-No 4K videos at the site.
-Photosets download with a computer-generated filename that is random.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Default filenames don't include the model name, video title, or any useful data.
-Photosets are tiny sets of 10 photos or less. These attractive models deserve a photoset of 100 photos per set.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Video count: 181 Scenes
Video runtime: averages 20 to 30 minutes.
Site theme: Lesbian action. Most of the scenes are two girls making out. But there are solo scenes where a girl is masturbating by herself.
The major attraction of the site is how attractive these models are. Almost all of the models are cute or attractive to lovely.
The site features mainly European models. I would guess Eastern Europe (from Russia or surrounding areas). Slender, white, late teens and twenties in age.
A Girl Knows features lesbian action. Mainly two girls making out. Not a lot of seduction: just two hot girls who find themselves attractive to each other and don't waste time talking, but start exploring each other's bodies with hands, lips, tongues, some use of toys.
There are some beach scenes, and the video photography is so crisp, you wish you were at the beach yourself, with or without the glamourous models, because the ocean water and waves look so good, especially in the heat of summer.
The site (and some other sites in the network) feature high class glamcore porn: Not a lot of heartcore, just attractive people who are enjoying themselves sexually. The sets are expensive, the videos are crisply photographed, the models are made up to look as attractive as possible. The models are A-Class models, with names like: Arteya, Lena Love, Lola Myluv, Lya Missy, Silvie Luca, Vanessa Decker.
My favorite channel in the network is The White Boxxx, because it's one of the finest glamcore sites on the internet: Lovely models, expensive sets, first-class videography. But A Girl Knows is a fine glamcore lesbian site along the same lines as The White Box. The reason I prefer The White Boxxx over A Girl Knows is that The White Box features boy-girl sex, instead of the lesbian sex of A Girl Knows.
That's just my personal preference.
Giving the site a score of 90.
If you experience the problems that other PU members have found, such as slow download speeds, 100 video per month download limit is annoying, download manager doesn't work with the site, member pages are slow to load, the video player is slow, etc., then your personal score of the site would be much lower.
Personally, I no longer download a lot, and the other problems haven't affected me very much. And I don't have any use for 4K videos, which some PU members really appreciate.
That's why I'm giving the channel a score of 90, because I think it's an excellent glamcore lesbian site.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
