Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month (recurring).
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 18 different sites.
-The site and the network are first class. First class in videos and photosets in technical features.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-All content is exclusive.
-Navigation is simple. Can easily change between sites. No additional re-login required.
-There are free cam shows included.
-Excellent model listing, with large thumbnail for each model.
-No download or streaming limits that I found.
-There is a simple search and an advance search. The advanced search has lots of different filters you can use.
-The quality of the photosets is excellent.
-Photosets have plenty of tags to describe the action.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in multiple definitions: 270p - 1080p.
-Photosets can be downloaded in small, medium and large definition zips (800px, 1333px, 3840px).
-This is a teen site and teen network. The models are A-list, very attractive.
Cons:
-The major con is this is a small site (19 videos and matching photosets). And it's an archive site. The last update was Apr 26, 2020. I guess the Covid epidemic shut down production.
That is a shame, because the videos and photosets are high quality, with attractive teen models.
-You get basic model information: girl's age, height, country, figure (e.g., 30B-24-33), and a fake bio that bullshit. For example, the bio for Vanna Bardot reads: "Vanna Bardot is a playful teen who loves toys, boys, and anything else that'll make her tight little pussy throb. Her puffy nipples are a perfect mouthful and her braces-filled smile is the epitome of innocence. You will love this tanned toned hottie!"
The bio is obviously fake: Vanna Bardot does not have braces. I don't know where they get the idea of innocence from, because in every video I've seen at the site and network, she's hot to trot.
My guess is they make up the bios without examining any of the site videos.
-No 4K video definition.
Bottom Line:
The site theme is teen girls who are being punished by being sent to a detention center.
That's the idea, but the videos and photosets only show a slight hint that the girls are at a detention center. They might sometimes wear an orange outfit, but that's about it. But the girls also wear tiny cut-off jeans, with g-string underwear, crop-top halters, for variety.
The holding cell for a girl is a large-sized bedroom, with a king-sized bed and the bedroom looks more like a nice motel room than a prison cell. You see framed photographs on the walls, nice nightstands with table lamps on either side of the bed, carpeted floors, an adjoining, individual bathroom with a toilet, large mirror, washbasin, and shower. Instead of bars, you have a doorway leading out of the bedroom that is not locked.
I guess the girls are supposed to be at high-class detention centers.
The only way to tell this is supposed to be a detention center is the site title, and the orange uniform some of the girls put on some of the time.
Some of the girls even have a pink teddy bear on their bed.
The sex is guy/girl, girl/girl, group with two or more girls, group with two or more girls with a guy, whatever.
The guards don't wear prison type clothes, but regular street clothes.
How do you know they are guards?
Because they tell the girls the girls are being bad. The girls are so horny they want to fuck. And the guards are willing to fuck the girls, after the girls plead to be fucked.
Or else, the girls try to get satisfaction with other girls (lesbian action).
In other words, the plots are basic or non-existent. "I'm horny, fuck me," says an attractive girl.
"No, don't be stupid," says the guard. "Please, I want you," says the girl.
"Well, all right," says the guard.
And they have sex.
Before the girl has sex with the guard, she might have sex with her pink teddy bear (to show you how horny she is).
Neither the script or the model has been nomimated for an academy award, or even for a Porn Star award, as far as I can tell.
I'm giving the site a score of 72.
The girls are attractive, the videos and photosets are good to excellent quality, the technical features of the site are fine. The problem is this is a small archive site with limited content.
However, you get access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network, which is 18 teen sites in all. The technical features of the network are excellent. But problem with the network is that the themes are "reality-based porn" that is so simple it's stupid. Instead of calling this "reality porn", I would say it's really a 12-year-old male's fantasy of what porn girls are like: attractive young girls who just want to have sex. There is no extreme, hardcore porn action, no domination or BDSM, just clean sex with horny young girls who want to be satisfied.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network of 16 sites. Access to any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month recurring.
-I've seen a current discounted sale membership of $84/year. But with the virus epidemic, affecting porn production, I don't know if an annual membership will have the normal update rate. Because many porn production sites have either shut down or reduced output.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. Which is nice, because many porn sites are starting to charge extra for downloading, or limiting your downloads by the day or month.
-CCBill and Epoch are the main billers, both trusted names. Easy to cancel, usually easy to deal with for a billing problem (except if you get scammed by a pre-checked cross-sale, that is hard to fight).
-Login and member pages are https. Which is nice, because it's less prone to hacking. And your ISP does not keep a record of each page you visit.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The main strength of the site and network is the models are cute young girls.
-Content is exclusive.
-Easy navigation. This is the way sites should be laid out, where it's easy to search the site's content and access the content. Something the Adult Time network needs to learn, because the Adult Time network is a huge, jumbled mess of some good and not-so-good porn.
CONS(START OF):
-The major con is this is a tiny site. 14 videos + matching photosets.
-A second major con is this is an archivie site. Last update was 2018-10-18.
So the site is tiny, and will not grow.
-So if you are stuck at home, in the stay-at-home order, you can scan and/or download the entire site in less than a day. However, you have the rest of the network to explore, which has a huge number of cute teens in hardcore (and some softcore) scenes and photos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
Bottom Line:
Site description (from the site):
When Daddy's Little Angel isn't ready to give up her virginity, he convinces her to let him cum through the backdoor. These taboo teens will do anything to impress their stepdads, even if it means getting their asses stretched with first time anal sex. Watch petite angels earn their wings with hardcore anal and double penetration scenes.
Growing up, I thought that Daddys Lil Angel was the best treat for Daddy. But this site seems to think that anal sex is the way to a Daddys heart and mind. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
The main site in the network is Nubiles.net. This is the jewel of the network, with it's massive collection of young porn stars. Many of the models make an early appearance in their career at Nubiles.net, which is like an encyclopedia of teen porn.
Nubiles Porn network includes:
Mainly teen sites, with a variety of niches: fake stepfamily taboo incest (I assume that showing "real" incest is against the law, or else why are there so many sites that show fake incest and constantly advertise that there is no real blood relation between the models?
Also features MILFs, lesbian, anal sex, etc.
One of the main benefits of watching porn is that it's a learning experience.
You learn how the real world operates.
It also serves to relieve stress.
For example, when you watch the videos at Daddys Lil Angel, you realize that young teens want to be good girls. But they also want to please their daddys.
These are step-daddys, not biological daddys. So it's taboo, but fake taboo. However, since the tender young teen is having sex with her step-father, there is also an element of young-old.
Many of the step-fathers shown at this site seem too young to have step-daughters this old.
But a younger step-father means a guy who has more energy and stamina to satisfy their step-daughters when they start to get it on.
And they do get it on.
Either the step-father is attracted to his lovely step-daughter, or the step-daughter is attracted to her step-father.
And it's the role of the step-father to instruct his daughter in the mysteries of sex.
Because these girls need a sex educational.
Although, to be truthful, many of the girls already seem to have a good idea of how to satisfy a man:
giving a blowjob, licking his cock and balls, having vaginal and anal sex, whatever it takes.
So the girls squeal and moan, and the step-father and step-daughter end up in each other's arms, totally satisfied after a strong sexual workout.
Although the site emphasizes anal sex, the sex formula is mainly a blowjob, then vaginal and then anal sex.
I guess that anal sex is supposed to be more of a taboo than vaginal sex, but all the videos have a blowjob, vaginal and anal sex. Very little of the man going down on the female.
The videos run about 20 to 30 minutes. The videos are clear and crisp, good focus, good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control, good production values.
This is middle of the road porn: not overly harsh or over-the-top. No slapping, hitting, spitting.
Video runtime is around 25 to 30 minutes.
Photosets go up to 180 photos per set.
Videos can be downloaded or streamed in 270p through 1080p.
The streaming player is good: the videos stream smoothly, not stuttering or buffering, no pixellation.
Daddys Lil Girl is plot-driven reality porn. Except the plot is paper thin: and the reality is bullshit. But this is porn, and you shouldn't expect a lot of reality in porn. Porn is basically fantasy.
There can be excellent porn: I think Pure Taboo is an excellent plot-driven porn site, that features strong plots with attractive models (attractive models are always an important element of any porn I might enjoy), and the plots are dark and twisted, with the twisted desires adding to the impact of the porn.
That is not the case with Daddys Lil Darling. The plots are paper-thin, the acting is poor, and the sex is by-the-book scripted, so it's not creative or intense.
The site gets a score of 72.
The pros:
Nice clean videos.
Models are just OK to attractive.
The main value is you get network access to the Nubiles Porn network. If this was a stand-alone site, the score would drop to the 50s.
The cons:
Tiny site. 14 videos.
Archive site. Last update was in 2018.
A listing of the 16 sites included in the Nubiles Porn network is shown in the first reply to this review.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Lets Doe It network, a mainly European glamcore network. The White Boxxx channel is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet, because of the care and techniques they use to make the attractive models as lovely as possible.
-You get access to all the channels (15 channels total) with a membership in any one of the channels, or with a membership to the Lets Doe It network. There are no premium channels you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Relaxxxed channel has 130 videos. So it's one of the larger channels in the network.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-Archive channel. Last update was 2018-07-10.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The first page you see when you login is a page of ads. This is a con and also a pro. Con, because who wants to see more ads, you paid for your membership, give me what I paid for, don't shove ads at me. Pro, because some of the ads have very low prices for some fine sites (as well as sites I have no interest in). So if I had lots of money (which I don't), the ads would be useful hints of what to join next. But I'm willing to browse the ads to see what's interesting--sort of like window shopping, where you browse the contents, even if you don't have much money to buy anything.
-There is a download limit of 100 videos per month for the entire network. Not a problem for me for 2 reasons: 1. I have a year-long membership. 2. I rarely download a lot. If I have an active membership, it's just easier for me to view/stream the content online. Instead of searching through my computer.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-There is no limit on downloading photosets. But the photosets are tiny, only 10 or less photos per set, so they are not worth collecting, even when the girl is attractive, because the photos, although nice, are not extra-ordinary. I've seen a lot of photos that by themselves are so gorgeous (the girl model is photographed so well) that it's worth keeping those photos, but none of the photos I've seen at the Relaxxxed channel are that special or worth keeping.
-In addition to the first page of ads that you have to click through to get to the member pages, there are ads at the bottom of each member page. But they are easy to ignore.
-There is a zip file for each photoset. But it downloads in only one definition (you can't choose low, medium or high). But since the photosets are not worth keeping, that's no problem.
-The photosets download with a generic file name of mixed alpha-numeric characters. So if you want to know what the file is, you have to rename it with model, title of set, etc. But again, not a problem, since the photosets are not worth downloading.
-A minor irritation. To list all the channels at the Lets Doe It network, you have to click the "Load More Channels" link to add additional channels. Which is irritating, because to get to some channels, such as Relaxxxed, you have to go through the "Load More Channels" routine every time you are logged out. And my laptop logs me out of the network a lot.
-I don't know if it's a server problem or my poor ISP connection, but I keep logging out of the site frequently, and have to re login. Not a major issue, but it's irritating. Again, don't know if the problem is with the site, or with my weak wifi connection that's causing the problem.
-This is off topic. I use a laptop with the WiFi signal from Spectrum. The WiFi signal is weak. The WiFi speed averages about 15-20 Mbps on a 200 Mbps connection. I was charged about $90 this month, and about $48 the previous month, for going over my cellular data limit. I normally pay $35/month for my cell phone. I talked to Spectrum tech support, and the agent told me my cell phone was probably using cellular data instead of my WiFi, because I have a weak WiFi signal.
This switching from WiFi to cellular data was done automatically by the phone, probably becasue the WiFi signal was weak. I went into the Spectrum office on Saturday, April 11, and the Spectrum agent changed the phone setup to use no cellular data.
But just as a special warning, which might never apply to anyone: you have to check your bills.
I am on automatic payments for my internet and cell phone usage.
So I didn't realize what was happening until I checked my last bill, and saw I was charged $90 for cell phone data usage.
That was a mistake. My cell phone data usage should be minimal: closer to zero than 1 GB, which is my monthly allowance.
But computers and cell phones can be tricky, and you can run up charges you aren't aware of, until you get the bill.
I shouldn't have been charged more than my $35 monthly payment, but because the cell phone was switching to cellular data from WiFi automatically, the bill was $90.
So, check your bills.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site stats:
Number of videos: 130. Archive site. Last update 2018-07-10.
Video runtime: 20 - 30 minutes.
You can stream or download videos in different definitions: 240p through 1080p.
Photosets: 10 or less photos in a set. Only one definition, but not worth downloading.
Download limit: 100 videos for the network per month.
The channel Relaxxxed theme is girls who are relaxing (laying at a pool, getting a message, doing yoga). An attractive guy shows up and the girl becomes aroused, and they have sex.
There are so many porn sites, and they are always looking for some new idea to make things interesting. But the idea for this channel is lame and poorly executed. There are many fine or good massage sites, and this could be one, instead of the short, senseless pre-buildup of a girl laying at a pool, or doing yoga. The massage theme can be done very easily: it doesn't require much acting on the part of the female model, so that's one of the reasons a massage video is easy to do well.
The attractive level of the models at Relaxxxed is below average for the network. The girls at The White Boxxx are attractive to begin with, and they are presented as gorgeous glamcore models.
The models are Relaxxxed are OK, but when you compare with The White Boxxx, are a real disappointment.
Sorry to keep harping on this, but The White Boxxx is probably the finest glamcore site on the internet. The models are presented in glorious, living color.
The relaxxxed channel does have some massage videos.
They are nothing special.
I much prefer the massage videos at Tricky Masseur or the Dane Jones massage videos because they are simpler, focus on arousing the girl through a massage and then fucking.
CONTINUED IN REPLY SECTION BELOW:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discount of $9.95 for the first month. Recurring at $24.95/mo.
-Exclusive content.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-User name is your email address, and you can choose your password, so they are easy to remember.
-Video choice of definition: 240p through 1080p. No 4K available for the site.
-Since the site focuses on female solo masturbation, the tags do a fine job describing the sex action of the video.
-They have a text listing of all the model names at the network (without any thumbnails).
You click on a model's name, it brings up the model's page, with large-sized thumbnails of the model, her videos at the network, and hot links to her content, with a very brief physical description of her attributes.
-PornDoe has a live cam channel. I'm not into live cams, so I didn't explore the channel.
Except the thumbnails show a lot of cute girls.
And there are some free videos and clips, mainly from Club Sweethearts, which is the new name for Club Seventeen.
Cons:
-Poor navigation. For a relatively small site, the site layout is poor.
Sometimes the whole network is fucking stupid.
You might have to navigate (click) through 2 pages of ads to get to the site you want to examine.
Sometimes they present the site in a foreign language, instead of the English language I'm familiar with.
Sometimes you are logged out of the network when you switch channels, and when you try to log back in, you have to click through 2 separate pages of ads before you reach the home page.
-There are ads on every page in the members area, once you get past the 2 separate pages that are only ads.
-Archive site. The last update was apparently Sep 04, 2017.
-They have a photoset for each video, but the photosets contain maybe 10 to 14 photos per set, and are not worth collecting.
-Two pre-checked cross-sales on join page. Be sure to uncheck the cross-sales, because they are limited trials that quickly turn into expensive memberships.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-There is a download limit of 100 videos per month, for the network. A download from any site in the network counts toward that limit.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Quest For Orgasm has 80 Scenes. So it's a small site. But you get access to the Lets Doe It network, which has around 15 sites. The star of the network is The White Boxxx, where they select attractive models and present them in glamcore style as some of the finest, most attractive models on the internet.
-You can sort the videos by newest, most popular, most viewed, or by longest.
-The models range from OK-looking, to attractive, to very attractive. But much more effort is put into making the models more attractive and glamorous at some of the other sites in the network, especially The White Boxxx site.
The models are white, Eastern European girls, late teens to early 30s.
The videos have a runtime from about 28 minutes to about 40 minutes at Quest For Orgasm.
The videos start out with an interview with the model, her life, why she got into porn, what she likes about porn, her hobbies. Trying to make the models seem real, that the models are normal people. After the interview, the model takes off her clothes and uses different toys to achieve orgasm.
Aside from the lousy navigation (the ads, the site time-outs), I didn't find most of the masturbation scenes that erotic. There is no fantasy element. It's porn stars using dildos to achieve orgasm.
Add that it's an archive site with no new content.
Add that there's little effort put into making the models attractive.
I signed up for a one-year membership to the network.
But the increased ads and the fast time-out and the increased difficulty of using the network mean this is my last membership to the network.
I don't have the patience to keep clicking through to find the content that I like.
That's in spite of how gorgeous some of these models are.
This is one of the poorer sites in the network.
I'm giving the site a score of 71.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 18videoz network.
-You get access to about 18 different sites with a membership.
-Epoch is the default biller, a trusted name. Easy to cancel.
-The site has a number of attractive teen models.
-The content is exclusive.
-Newer videos offer the choice of definition for low, medium, high, and 4K videos.
That is for downloading.
-Newer videos offer streaming in 240p, 720p. 1080p.
Cons:
-If you join the site directly (Young Libertines), you pay a much higher price than if you join through the 18videoz site: the 18videoz site gives you access to Young Libertines, as well as other teen sites).
-PU has a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month for 18videoz. The price for Young Libertines is much higher.
-PU also has a discounted price of $59.95/year for 18videoz. The price for Young Libertines is much higher.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The public page shows cute models in the thumbnails, but the page looks like it was designed years ago.
-Username and password are computer generated. A random mix of letters and numbers you have to write down.
-The login and member pages are non-secure. Not https. So prone to hacking.
-Some of the thumbnails, instead of loading a video you want to watch, are ads that load a new site that you can join. Annoying that the ads aren't clearly marked as ads.
-Slow update rate. One video/month recently. Was 2 videos before.
Bottom Line:
The stats are for the 18videoz network.
When you log in to the site, the stats shown are for the network, instead of for the site by itself, although you don't realize that until you check further on what the network stats are.
Trying to check what the stats are for the site, by itself, would take a lot of time and effort.
Which is different from what many other porn sites do: many porn sites show clearly what the number of videos, models, photosets are for the individual sites.
Network stats:
videos: 3202
models: 2243
photos: 210518
photosets: 2441
The Young Libertines site was launched in 2008.
It started out as a low-rent collection of teen hardcore vidoes. Although they used attractive teen models, the videos were cheaply made: No effort was made into making the models look pretty. The technical factors were poor: poor lighting, poor sound control, cheap sets (mainly rooms that look like they are run-down public housing).
The current public preview page is old and should be updated.
The main con is that the site started out years ago as a low-rent collection of teen hardcore videos.
And it's still seems like a low-rent collection of teen hardcore videos.
Although the site might have been a worthwhile join back in 2008, when it was first starting out, the site is poor choice for your money in today's world, where the porn offerings on the internet are far superior to what you will find at this site.
To make it simple:
It the content worth viewing? No, it's not. The models are attractive, but many of the videos are poor in quality because of the cheap sets, poor lighting, poor costumes, cheap video equipment.
They really need to update the site, to make the overall site more attractive, to clearly separate the newer videos from the older, lower-quality content. Otherwise, you get the impression that the entire site is a jumbled mess of low-quality porn.
The price is cheap, if you join through the 18videoz site, instead of through the more expensive Young Libertines site. But even with a cheap price, the contents at the Young Libertines site are a waste of time and money. Unless you can find some videos at the other sites in the network that are worthwhile, you will regret joining the Young Libertines site.
Although site navigation and other factors are important in scoring a site, if the content is not worth viewing, who cares if the site navigation is easy?
The site navigation is easy, but you are looking at low-grade videos that are a waste of time.
Although they have upgraded the videos over the last few years, the videos still seem like cheaply made videos. They are more like home-made videos instead of the excellent videos you can find at X-Art, or the Wow porn sites, or the better quality videos at Teen Mega World.
I honestly don't know why the videos seem like home-made, amateur videos. Unless that is the vibe they are going for.
The videos at the other sites I mentioned are so much better in quality and visual appeal.
Edit: I am slow. They are going for the home-made, amateur video vibe.
And that's why I don't appreciate the site.
I much prefer the X-Art, Wow Girls and Wow Porn style of professional quality videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You get access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-The network updates weekly. But this site gets one video update per month, which is very poor. Actually, the update rate is less than 1 update per month. They put videos from other sites in the network into this site, and I'm counting those out-of-site-videos as part of the update rate, since it's often difficult to tell from a video whether it really belongs to this site or should have been put into one of the other network sites. Or maybe a video is double-counted, and the same video is put into the Unlimited MILFs site and also put into a different site such as Family XXX.
-Videos for the last few years are offered in 360p through 4K definition.
-There is a photo set for each video. And it has a zip file. But the photo set is only offered in one definition for downloads. Except I don't like any of the models at this site, so I passed on downloading.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The videos at the site are exclusive to the network (exclusive to the network, but you can find a lot of the videos from this site at a different site in the network).
-As far as I can tell, there is unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading for the site and the network.
CONS(START OF):
-Navigation is poor. They don't put the posting date for each video in a convenient position.
-The links are slow to respond. You click on a hot link, and can wait a minute or more for the page to change to your destination.
-A lot of the models have breast implants that are large to huge. I'm not a fan of breast implants, especially oversized breasts.
-A lot of the models aren't very attractive.
-There is a lot of screaming and yelling to show fake excitement. Play these videos on low volume, or your neighbors will wonder what the fuck is going on.
Bottom Line:
Site features videos where the stepmom has sex with her stepson. There's very little lead-in to the sex, almost no plot, other than they establish that the older woman (in her 30s or older) is the stepmom and the stunt cock is her stepson. And then they suck and fuck and whatever. Which gets old fast, since the models aren't that attractive.
I much prefer other sites in the network, such as Family XXX or The Lesbian Experience, where there is more of a story, and the models are better looking, and usually younger. And there are less implants. And a lot of the models have tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Videos run around 30 to 35 minutes, which would be a good length, if there was some story to give meaning to the sex, which there isn't. And since I don't find the models attractive, the site is basically a waste of space for me.
But watch a few videos, and maybe you might enjoy these videos. Maybe yes, or maybe no.
I realize I'm being very critical.
The reason is, I do enjoy watching some of the videos at some other sites: either I enjoy the stories, or the more attractive models, or the visual sex, or a combination of those factors. So, why should I watch the videos at this site, which feature models that I don't find attractive, and almost-no-plot stories, and sex that is basically boring?
So the site is a waste of my time.
And the navigation is poor: Not only are the hot links slow to load content, but moving around the site to explore what it has to offer is slow and cumbersome. And the search is poor: you enter a model's name, and it will give you a bunch of names in return. And if you do get to the model's page, it probably won't list all of her content at the site or network.
They need to get a software engineer to re-vitalize the site and network, and make it easier to use.
You can often join this site during holiday specials, for $60 a year. But the question is: why would you want to join for a year?
Most PU members would only join for a month, and download whatever they want from the network.
And then rejoin a year or two later, to see if there is any new content they might find interesting.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Teen Mega World network. Membership in any one of the network sites give you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for to access.
-It's easy to switch between different sites of the network. You don't have to re-login to each separate site.
-Low price. PU offers a $14.95/month recurring discount.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-Small archive site, only has 43 videos and matching photosets.
-Last update was April 2013. The videos are offered in 360p, 480p, 720p.
Many PU members want higher definitions, 1080p or 4K, for their viewing pleasure.
-Login and member pages are non-secure.
-The site features real teens. Some of them are attractive. But overall, I feel the site models are less attractive than the general level of the models of the entire network.
-Poor search engine. You enter a model's name, and you get numerous hits that are random. The best way to search for a model's content is to go the model's page, where you will find links to her content at the entire network.
-Vendo is the default payment processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch.
However, I've had many memberships through Vendo, and never had a problem.
Actually, I like Vendo, because the Vendo website shows you all your current memberships through Vendo.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Whereas CCBill will only show you a single subscription on a single page (you have to enter separately your identification details for each sub you want to look up).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-A line of ads at the bottom of each member page. Not too obtrusive.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: is a female model reaching orgasm.
Most of the videos are guy/girl, but there are a few threesomes, and one lesbian video of two girls.
The site advertises: "This amazing website provides you with the greatest collection of massive 'Oh my God' orgasms. Stay here, and experience divine arousal followed by the most powerful climaxes!"
I think that's typical porn site exaggeration.
Although the videos do show orgasm, I couldn't find any divine, over-the-top videos at the site. For that, I would recommend Rocco Siffredi or the Teen Fidelity sites, which do offer some over-the-top videos of intense sex.
The site only has 43 videos (and matching photosets).
It was started in August 2012 and stopped updating in April 2013.
So it's a small archive site.
As a small archive site, the content is standard teen hardcore. The main positive about the site is that you get access to the entire Teen Mega World network. You can skim the site contents in less than a day, downloading whatever is of interest in less than a day. But the network itself has plenty of good, solid teen hardcore content with plenty of attractive young teens.
I'm giving the site a score of 70. If the site was a stand-alone site, the score would be lower. But as part of the Teen Mega World network, the site is worth browsing to find whatever content might interest you.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the LetsDoeIt network, one of the premium glamcore networks on the internet.
-There is unlimited streaming of videos.
-Unlimited downloading of photosets.
-But there is a network download limit of 100 videos/month. This video limit is clearly shown.
-The content is exclusive.
-PU has a discounted price of $24.95/month recurring.
However, since Bums Bus is part of the LetsDoeIt network, it might be cheaper to buy a membership directly through LetsDoeIt, to access the Bums Bus channel. LetsDoeIt special discounts are often found, while Bums Bus specials are less frequient.
Cons:
-2 Pre-checked cross-sales on join page.
-The dialogue is in German. Some of the videos have subtitles. But whether the video has subtitles or not doesn't matter: I don't care what they are saying. You read a few subtitles, you get they are making jokes and having a good time before and during and after the sex, and it's all pointless: unless you've really drunk, and think these jerks are really cool studs. Otherwise, it's just a waste of time and video, and let's switch to a better channel.
-Appears to be an archive site. The last update was 2018-12-13.
-There is often a lot of filler material on a video before you get to the nudity or sex.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: German girls are given a ride in a bus and have hardcore sex.
The bus is actually a van.
The site has 134 videos.
-Although the channel is part of the LetsDoeIt network, this channel is not glamcore.
The vibe they are going for is trash porn, with a dose of humor.
It's like an updated version of the Beatles "A Hard Days Night", with the frenetic camera work and a low-trash hardcore porn twist for the intro section of the video.
The description for the last updated video (posted 2018-12-13) is as follows:
European girl has sex for money
"Jason Steel convinced the beautiful Kim Davis, a student, to have sex in front of the camera for money. This European girl didn't hesitate to say "yes." The two of them get into intense action on the back of the van. See how this German beauty sucks and takes dick in pussy for cash!"
Jason Steel is the main stunt cock for this video.
Kim Davis is described as beautiful.
She is nice-looking, but I wouldn't call her beautiful. Except this is porn, and they exaggerate everything anyway.
The video runtime is 42.03.
You don't get to the sex or any nudity until the 20 minute mark, where you start to see her topless.
From there, you eventually get to the sex. Except by then: I'm thinking why have I wasted so much time on this video? Or this channel? When the other channels are so much better to watch.
The models at the other channels are better looking. And you get to the sex so much faster. And the sex at most of other channels is easier to watch.
Or you can switch to a different network, where the girls are attractive, and the sex is good.
I'm giving this channel two thumbs down.
I've seen worse sites, and the technical factors of the video are good, except I've used up my patience waiting for something good to happen.
I'm giving the channel a score of 70.
And that's only because if you joined this site, you also gained access to the rest of the LetsDoeIt network, which has some very good sites.
Side note: I selected that I've been a member of the site/channel for over 12 months. That's because I've been a member of LetsDoeIt for over 12 months, which gives me access to this site. If Bums Bus was a stand-alone site, I would give it a score of 50.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. So you get access to 17 different sites. The most valuable site in the network is the Nubiles.net site, which is like an encyclopedia of young porn stars starting out in their porn career.
-Tiny site, so navigation is simple to find the entire content. Only 14 videos total.
-Videos have your choice of definition for streaming and downloading: from 270p through 1080p.
-Videos have an accompanying photo set and screen cap set.
-The photo set has 3 zip file definitions: small, medium and large.
-You also get a screen cap set of each video. Not sure why a screen cap is useful if you have access to the photo set. Because the screen cap files are large: 1.5 to 2.0 MB each. The photos are slightly better focused than the screen caps, the photo gives you your choice of small, medium or large definition, and even the large definition individual photo is only around 4 MB in file size. So I see no reason to have the screen cap version available.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The videos and photosets are clear and crisp. Professional lighting, focus, nice sets.
-The tags and text description of each video do an excellent job describing the video.
-Content is exclusive.
CONS(START OF):
-The main con is this is an archive site. The last update was Oct 18, 2018.
-Tiny site. 14 videos total.
-Lots of ads. The first page you see after you login is a page full of ads. Then, when you click to the members area, you see ads on every member page. But those ads are located near the bottom of the page and can be easily ignored.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Uncheck the cross-sale checkmark, or you will be signed up to a limited trial membership to a different site which turns into an expensive membership within 2 or 3 days. If you do want to join that other site, join with a PU discount if there is one, or join directly, for a much cheaper price.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 14
Archive site: last update was Oct 18, 2018.
These videos are based on real incidents.
That's why they are called reality video.
Edit: I was being facetious with my remarks about reality porn. Most reality porn does not use real-life couples. The models can be amateurs or professionals, but the couples are not real-life couples. Just a guy and a girl who are being paid to have sex.
Studies have shown that most teenagers have been exposed to porn.
So teens are getting at least part of their education about sex from porn. Which is a poor source of information, because most porn is unrealistic fantasy.
The site title is Daddy's Lil Angel. But the subtitle, as shown in some videos, is "Teen Anal Porn". Which explains the site focus on anal play.
I would assume that Daddy's Lil Angel would be about the fantasy of fathers having taboo sex with their daughters. Apparently the fantasy of fathers having sex with their daughters is borderline illegal. What porn sites show for incest porn is sex between step-relatives. Almost all porn sites that show incest porn make that very clear: it's a step-relative, a step-father, step-mother, step-sister or step-brother, not a blood relative, even though these are all actors anyway, and not related by blood.
So the site theme is step-fathers having anal sex with their step-daughters.
Which seems like a simple idea to play.
Except most porn models are not good actors.
And the plots at this site are paper-thin.
The step father, for some reason, wants to punish his step daughter, he spanks her, she's excited by the spanking, he's angry and excited by her response, he whips out his cock, shoves it in her mouth, she starts sucking, then it's off to the races with cunnilingus, vaginal and anal sex, etc.
The basic plot is the step-daughter does something that ticks off the step-father. This leads to sex, no matter how flimsy the reason. Or for no reason, except this is what the plot says to do: have sex, after showing that the girl is the step-daughter.
Really stupid plots. Really poor acting. But you're supposed to turn off your brain and enjoy the nudity and sex.
The level of attractiveness of the models is below the standards of the network. They are not ugly, but they're just not as cute or pretty as most of the models at the other network sites.
What could they do to improve the site?
Choose more attractive models. Models who can act. Use plots that make more sense, or that are more believable. The videos and photo sets are fine technically: crisp, clear imagery, nice sets. But it's wasted on poor content.
Or they could just delete the site. Because it seems like wasted space. A wasted theme.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU lists the membership price at $59.95/month, with a PU discount of $39.99/month recurring.
Or a 1 year membership for $119.88.
I found a holiday discount of $59.95 for the first year. So if you want to join the network, or one of its sites, I suggest waiting for a holiday discount, since it's so much cheaper.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-The network includes about 20 different sites. The most famous one is JamesDeen.com, because James Deen has made a name for himself as a porn star.
-There is a large amount of hardcore videos at the network. Some videos available in 4K, most are available in 1080p and lower definitions.
-Content is exclusive.
-If cookies are enabled, you don't have to enter your login details, you are automatically entered into the site once you click on the "login" link.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Easy to use slide-show program for viewing photosets.
-Photosets have 2 choices of definition for a zip file: 1024p and 1600p.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Photoset default filename includes the model's name, title of the set, and file definition.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Sometimes your login details fail to work. You have to try to get new login details, or play around with your old login details hoping it will get you into the network.
-Rocketgate is the default biller. I think CCBill or Famesupport are easier to deal with.
-I don't believe I got a confirming email on my membership. Which creates problems. Especially if the site does not recognize your login details. Rocketgate, the default biller, does not seem very responsive about confirming your membership, even though they were the biller I used to join, and I sent them my name, email address, the last four digits of my credit card I used to join, and the amount and date of my join.
-The photosets are shot by a professional photographer: so the photos are real photos and not screencaps.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The photos are well lit. But the photos fail to emphasize the physical beauty of the models (even when some of the models are naturally attractive). Riley Reid is attractive, but her photosets present her as a plain-looking girl. Chloe Cherry comes across a litte better. Chloe can be a fine-looking model, but I don't want to save any of her photosets: I want a model to be attractive, or seductive, or somebody I can fantasize about fucking. But the photosets of Chloe are not appealing. I'd rather look at photos of the meat hanging in a butcher's shop, which, while not sexual, can be interesting because I know the meat can be transformed into a delicious meal. Looking at Chloe's photos, I get turned off by her skin tones, by how un-attractive she appears.
And that's for the good looking models, who are in the minority of models.
The majority of the site models are plain to unattractive.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The network gives you access to about 20 different porn sites. The most famous site is JamesDeen.com, because he's made a name for himself as a porn star. There's some controvery about James Deen: he's been accused of abuse by some of his sex partners. Deen claims he's innocent and can't understand why women would complain about his rough treatment of them during sex. He's just a simple, innocent guy who enjoys slapping women, spitting on them, twisting their arms to make them moan, and showing sluts that he's the master who controls these cunts with his powerful cock. And he smiles a lot, which shows he's just a good old boy from Pasadena, California.
The network features rough sex. A lot of anal sex. The models are usually called sluts, and treated as pieces of meat. Women are to be used and abused, because men are dominant creatures.
The models are sluts: So you get lots of tattoos and implants.
Even the cute models come across as trailer trash whores.
I enjoy softcore and hardcore. But this network doesn't appeal to me. Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film, two competing sites, are much more interesting and enjoyable. For one thing, Rocco Siffredi and Devils Film features more attractive models. Some of the sex scenes at Rocco and Devils Film can be intriguing. And hot.
Whereas the full porn network scenes focus on rough sex, anal sex, treating the women like pieces of meat.
There is a channel called "Sex Games". It appears to be an adult animation channel, where you can play with cartoon figures and fap (masturbate).
Edit: My mistake. The "Sex Games" link, although placed at the top of the page as a normal channel, is actually a separate site, and not part of the Full Porn Network.
The reason I'm leaving it in this review is the "Sex Games" site appears to be very impressive.
A lot of thought and skilled technical knowledge went into making the site.
Joining that site is free.
I recommend checking it out.
Although free porn sites are not reviewed at the PU site, the free site seems intriguing.
I wish there were more hours in a day, because the questions they ask of your thoughts and desires, and the quality of the cartoon images, is just amazing at dirtyfapgame. I haven't joined the site yet, but I hope to join soon.
Getting back to Full Porn Network:
This is personal taste, but the vibe of the network does not appeal to me:
I want young girls who look attractive, and seem to enjoy sex.
The theme of the network is rough sex, anal sex, treating girls and women as sluts who should be abused, because men are dominant creatures, and girls are happiest when you spit on them, force them into painful and uncomfortable positions, slap them around, all in the nature of treating women as they secretly desire.
So if you fantasize about rough sex, anal sex, then the network might be appealing.
Especially if you can get a holiday special for around $60 for the first year.
Otherwise, the PU discounts are OK, but way too high for my budget.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Note: It looks like the Teens Analyzed site and the 18videoz did a very recent update.
18videoz now gives you access to 16 sites, instead of the 18 sites it gave you until recently. Teens Analyzed is no longer part of the 18videoz network. This probably happened in the last few weeks.
The 18videoz site does not explain dropping the Teens Analyzed site from the network access.
I don't know if I'm considered a member of the Teens Analyzed site. Until a few weeks ago, I was a member, through my membership in 18videosz network.
PROS
-Join through the 18videoz site for $60/year. If you join through the Teens Analyzed site, you are charged $120/year. Both sites, until recently, gave you access to the same network sites.
I don't know if joining through Teens Analyzed gives you access to a few more sites or not, but in my opinion, paying a premium price for access to Teens Analyzed is not worth the extra money.
-18videoz.com network now gives you access to 16 sites.
Cons:
PROS(continued):
Until recently (within the last few weeks), you had access to 18 sites.
-Low cost site. I got a 1-year membership for $60, which is the current price for 18videoz site/network.
The current price for Teens Analyzed site (which includes the 18videoz network plus maybe a few more sites) is $120/year.
-The site and network is teen hardcore.
-Reality based porn.
-Not a lot of plot build-up. A guy and girl might tell each other hi, and then it's time to fuck. So no romance or build-up.
-Same login details work for all sites in the network you have access to.
-Video definition is mobile through 1080p.
-Site has 286 videos.
-The network gives you access to 3,278 videos.
-The content is mainly exclusive. I've only seen one video at the network that appears at competing networks.
-Customer support is Vendo. Which has a responsive live chat that is 24/7.
-Epoch is the primary biller. One of the trusted names.
-Unlimited downloads.
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-They have changed the structure of the Teens Analyzed site. So I'm still unsure of how to navigate the site.
I haven't found the link to streaming videos. Maybe they will add streaming later, but for now, it appears to be dropped.
So it's much easier to download a video and watch it on my PC.
-Archive site. They advertise 2 updates per week, but the last update was November 13, 2018.
-Login and member pages are not secure. You get a popup warning from your browser that login details are open to hacking.
-Username and password are computer generated. Impossible to remember.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-A wide range of model attractiveness: there are some really cute girls, but little effort is made to present the models attractively. Except that many of the girls are really cute, and they don't need make-up or special costumes for their young beauty to shine through.
-Once in a while, you hit the login page link, and get the error message: 502 Bad Gateway.
-This is not a con of the search: but if you put in a model's name, you can find many models share the same name, so you have to check the thumbnails to see which model you are looking for.
-Default filename for videos is "fulllength-high.wmv", so you have to manually rename the files to show the model name, site name, etc.
-Once in a while your login details do not work. I assume the reason is the site is forcing members to reset their password for security purposes, instead of the password being hacked. I've had to re-set my password a few times every few months, because the old password stopped working.
-I think they updated the public page for the site. They now advertise that the network has 28 sites. However, if you count the number of sites listed, it's now 16 sites for the 18Videoz network. And the number of sites for the Teens Analyzed site is hard to determine. They also advertise that new sites are coming, but I put little faith in that claim.
-The coding for the videos is not efficient. A video file in 1080p with a runtime of 28 minutes 33 seconds takes 1.23 GB storage space. The video total bitrate is 6192kbps with a framerate of 25.00 frames/second.
BOTTOM LINE
-Site theme: First anal sex makes these teenies scream of painful pleasure.
That is the theme, but I doubt any of these girls are having anal sex for the first time.
Video runtime is usually 20 to 30 minutes.
Video definition goes from mobile to 1080p. That is for all the videos, even the earliest ones from 2012.
Maybe I was being too harsh when I said that there is no setup to the sex.
For example, one video shows a teen coughing, she calls a doctor, who shows up wearing a mask (and this was in 2012, before the Covid epidemic). He takes her temp, looks in her mouth, touches her throat, she starts stroking his arm (I guess it's different in Eastern Europe: if a doctor touches your throat, the correct response is to stroke the doctor's arm), she starts to giggle, and touches his shoulder, then starts stroking his groin (he's still wearing his doctor's clothes), then she takes off the doctor's mask, so he can suck and lick her titties, and it's time for the good old blowjob-vaginal-anal-intercourse routine.
I'm moving to Europe, where I can find some of these good-looking horny Russian babes.
I still think there is little build-up to the sex, unless you count a minute or two of a guy and girl looking at each other before the sex begins.
Actually, I'm surprised the quality of the videos is as good as it is. Many of the videos have professional camera-work (good focus, no jiggles from the camera), good lighting, an OK to a nice setting. But the main attraction is the level of attractiveness of the young, teenage models: you have some real cuties here, that you will have seen at many other sites: mainly Eastern European teen models. Teens Analyzed is one of the better sites in what used to be the 18Videoz network.
But I don't think the Teens Analyzed site is still considered part of the 18Videoz network, because it's not listed in the current listing of 18Videoz sites.
I'm giving the Teens Analyzed site a score of 69. That is very subjective.
The main objection is the membership price: $120/year is way too high.
This is an archive site. That stopped updating 2 years ago.
There are other cons:
For one, I think Teens Analyzed is no longer part of the 18Videoz network).
Another problem: they seem to have dropped the option to stream videos.
Another problem: the structure of the Teens Analyzed site is buggy: For example, the link "Bonuses" brings up a page that states "There are no such bonus There are no such bonus".
I think they are working on the structure of the site, and there are bugs that need to be fixed. The streaming option seems to have disappeared. The model listing seems to have disappeared.
I would not pay the premium membership to join this site.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You can sometimes find a low-priced membership of around $60 for 1 year.
-A lot of cute models at the site and network.
-Videos offered in your choice of definition:
Download from mobile up to 4K.
Streaming offered in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-Video runtime around 25-30 minutes, so easy to watch.
-Sex is basic, with oral, vaginal, anal.
-You get access to around 15+ sites in the network.
-Network has 3246 videos, 2256 models.
-Site has 182 videos.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update was May 29, 2020. Before that, the update rate was 1 or 2 videos per month.
-Login and member pages are not secure, so prone to hacking. A few days ago, I got a message my account was blocked, due to password sharing. I've never shared my password with anyone. I don't know if the account was hacked, or it's just a glitch with the site server.
-Navigation is poor. Multiple reasons for this:
-The search engine is messed up.
-1. It only returns a minimal number of hits if you enter a phrase such as "redhead model".
I got 3 hits. Surely, there are more than 3 redheaded models at the site and network.
2. The search engine freezes your search term. After entering the phrase "redhead model", I tried entering a different phrase to search for. The seach engine returned the previous search, "redhead model", and wouldn't search for a new phrase. Even when I logged out of the site and re-logged in, and tried use the search for a different phrase, the site still showed me
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
"redhead model" as my search term.
I don't know what to call it, except messed up. And worthless.
3. They have a model listing, but it's only for the network, not for the site.
And they mix in the stunt cocks in the model listing. So you have to manually page through thousands of mdoels in the model listing to find the models you might like. Which takes a lot of time. The model thumbnails are small and not flattering to the models, and the thumbnails for the individual videos are small and not flattering to the models, which decreases your interest in the videos.
It's just a poor presentation of the site and network.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Network advertises "most beautiful amateur girls ultimate hardcore action".
But that is standard porn hype. Many of these girls are Eastern European models you've seen at many different porn sites. And I wouldn't call the action the ultimate hardcore. If you want over-the-top hardcore, visit Rocco Siffredi, or the Porn Fidelity sites.
-The photosets download in only 1 file definition. But the quality is just OK to poor. The photos are more like screen caps. What is surprising is the size of the downloaded photoset. Around 245 MB for a photoset of 102 photos. MetArt's high grade high definition photos are in that size range, and First Anal Date's photos are more like screen caps than real photos, so I don't know why the First Anal Date photos are so large.
The First Anal Date photosets are not worth collecting, even when the model is cute, because the quality of the photos is poor.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
In spite of a number of attractive models, the site does not impress me much.
The videos seem like home-shot videos, even though they are probably professionally shot.
The sets are just OK, not as nice as what you find at many competing teen hardcore sites.
Stats:
Videos: 182 videos.
Video runtime: 20-30 minutes.
Photosets: around 100 pics per set.
Photoset size: around 245 MB.
Photo quality: poor.
I would rather spend a few more dollars and get a membership in a porn site/network that will give me better quality content. It's not the attractiveness of the models, but the overall impression of watching home-made sex videos that is poor.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-First rate technical features for the site and network.
-You can stream and download the videos in your choice of definition.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-There are currently 17 sites included in the network. They cover a wide variety of niches. Many of the sites feature stupid or repititive plots, but the models are mainly attractive, and the production values are top-quality, and some of the sex can be hot. So ignore the stupid plots, and focus on the attractive teen models who put on a show for your personal enjoyment.
-You can join through PayPal, credit card, checking account.
-You can choose your own username and password.
Cons:
-Small site, only 30 videos.
-Last update was Feb 3, 2020. Could be considered an archive site. Maybe, once the virus epidemic has gone, they could start to update the site again.
-PU does not have a regular discounted membership price to this site. The regular price is $29.32/month, or $199.00/year, which is very expensive. You can often find discounted memberships to one of the other sites in the network, especially during holidays. Wait for a holiday, and join through one of the other network sites, to save money. Membership in any site in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network.
-You can often find a membership to the network for $19.98/month or $99.95/year, or maybe even cheaper.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: videos are a parody of popular TV shows. The hardcore sex is supposed to add interest to the parodies.
However, the parodies don't impress me much. Give the performers an A for effort, but the acting skills are at the kindergarden level. The production values are excellent, and many of the models are very attractive teens, but the stories are so stupid, you should turn the sound off, but then a lot of the time is spent on meaningless story background, which I didn't find amusing, so I would give the site a score of 68, in spite of the good production values and the cute models.
Basically, I think the site is a waste of bandwidth, and the time and effort put into making the videos would have been better used to make straight hardcore porn. The site and network are trying to make alternative porn, but if you want alternative porn that is plot driven, you should watch the Pure Taboo site of the Adult Time network, which has excellent plot-driven porn of twisted desires.
Nubiles ET was launched Nov 15, 2018.
It has 30 episodes/videos, so it's a small site.
The last update was Feb 3, 2020.
It's now August 21, 2020, so it's been over 6 months since the last update.
I don't know whether the site will start updating once the virus epidemic has passed.
Either way, the site is small, and you can browse the videos in a few days or less.
Personally, I didn't find a single video that I enjoyed, or downloaded for keeping.
The network has 1400+ videos, and you will find a lot of good teen content for your viewing.
But the Nubiles ET site was a waste of time, for me.
In spite of the good production values and some cute models.
(The good production values do not include acting ability on the part of the models. Maybe it's also partly due to the poor scripts they were given to follow.)
Main takeaway: small archive site with stupid plots that detract from the sex. The site is a waste of time. However, you get access to the entire network, which has 17 teen sites, and the network does have value: a lot of attractive teen models, good to excellent production values, good choices for streaming and downloading.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Content is exclusive.
-The site (and network) is laid out to make navigation simple. You can easily find the video content of the site
-No site timeout that I can find. You can leave the site inactive for hours, and will still be logged in. Perfect for guys who forget what they are logged into (Joke. PU members are self-aware, and watch their porn closely.)
-In the last year, they added secure login to the site/network. In the last month, they made the member pages secure (https).
-The videos were shot in the US, so the models speak English. Which helps to show how these macho studs enjoy humiliating these girls.
Cons:
-Do not join the site through the site itself. You will be paying a high price.
$29.95/month, or $50 for 3 months.
Join through the 18Videoz site, where the fee is $60/year. Or $15/month.
The 18Videoz membership includes The Girls Next Door Abused site, plus access to 17 more sites.
-The main con is this is an archive site. The site stopped updating in 2012 or earlier.
A PU member in 2008 reported that the site had stopped updating, but was changing the content posting dates to give the impression that content was newly added.
-Ads on every page.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-They need to do an update of the public page advertising the site.
The photos/thumbnails are washed out images, with poor colors, images that are not clear and crisp.
The public page is the first thing a person sees when looking at the site.
They need to sell the site, not show an old tired page that has been out of date for many years.
Bottom Line:
Because this is an archive site, with old content, the videos and screenshots are low quality. The photography is poor, the lighting is poor, the colors are poor, the sets are cheap, the definition is low compared to what most porn sites offer.
The only value this site offers is a reminder of the early days of porn. And what producers could get away with.
The site theme is treating girls like trash: get your rocks off with these girls, lie to them, humiliate them, and show them what a macho stud you are before pushing them out the door.
Site contents: 48 videos.
Runtime is 20 to 33 minutes.
There is a montage of screenshots for each video, but no way to view the individual screenshots online, or to download the screenshot set. The hot link for online viewing of the screenshots has disappeared, and the hot link for downloading a zip file for the screenshots has disappeared. And tech support pays no attention to such minor defects.
I'm giving the site a score of 65. Most of the archive sites in this network stopped updating 5 or more years ago, and the quality of the videos is poor: low definition, cheap sets, poor lighting, low technical production values, etc. There are some sites in the network that are still updating, and the videos at those sites are much higher quality. Also, there are a number of cute models at these other sites.
This is a personal opinion, but I don't enjoy watching videos of macho studs fucking young girls and then humiliating them for being stupid enough to have sex with them. It doesn't make me feel smarter or more macho.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month (recurring), or $99.95/year (recurring).
Since this is a tiny site, you would only join because you get access to the entire Nubiles Porn network, which has 17 sites, and over 1,000 videos.
-Note: they are currently running a special price of $84/year recurring if you join through the nubiles-porn site directly. If you join through the Nubiles Unscripted site, the yearly fee is $99.95/year (recurring). Joining any one of the sites in the Nubiles-Porn network gives you access to the entire network.
-Many alternatives to pay for membership: Credit card, paypal, checking account, EU direct debit.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. Many other sites now charge extra for downloading.
-Streaming and downloading are offered in your choice of definition: 270p through 1080p.
-The production values are excellent: nice sets, crystal clear videos, good framing, steady cam-work, good sound control. And the girls are mainly attractive to very cute.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can play the videos at 1/4, 1/2, 1, 1.5, 2 times normal speed.
-Since the site is so small, you can browse the entire site videos in 1 or 2 days.
Download the videos you want, and then move on to the other sites in the network.
Except the Nubiles.net site is like an encylopedia, so you can spend hours and hours browsing through the site to find your favorite models.
CONS(START OF):
-This is a tiny site, only 16 videos. That is the main defect of the site.
-Archive site. Last update was in March 2018.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The advertising for the site is misleading: it promises multiple weekly updates. This is an archive site, the last update was in March 2018. The only justification for the claim of updates is if they say the advertising refers to the network. The advertising is placed on the site page, and does not mention that the updates refer to the network. So the advertising is definitely misleading.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Videos: 16
Video runtime: 20 to 46 minutes.
The idea for the site was to create unique videos of girls getting off. Whether its lesbian or boy-girl, 2-or-more-girls-on-a guy, the settings change from an engine shop to a cabin in the woods to an off-road vehicle with a male driver and 3 cute girls giving each other a sexy time as well as the male stunt cock driver. To other locations.
The locations change, but the sexual energy is high.
There is very little plot. Not a lot of build-up before the teasing and sex starts. So you don't have to wait for the action to start.
I don't know why the site stopped updating in a little over a year: Maybe it was more expensive shooting at differnent locations, instead of a studio.
So the idea for the site was good, because it showcased cute girls having sex at different locations.
But the site stopped updating, and that is the major fault with the site: it only has 16 videos.
However, as I mentioned, membership in any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network, so you have over 1,000 teen videos to sample, and find the ones you enjoy.
There are plenty of cute girls at the network.
One problem with the network is that many of the sites feature stupid plots.
And the models, while mainly cute, are not good actors.
Which takes away from the enjoyment of the sex.
You need to put your brain on hold while watching many of the videos at the network.
Or have a few beers or your choice of alcoholic beverage before watching some of these videos.
I'm giving the site a score of 65.
If this was a stand-alone site, I would heavily recommend against joining.
However, it's part of the Nubiles-porn network, and membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites.
The main jewel of the network is Nubiles.net, which is like an encyclopedia of fresh teen starlets. Nubiles.net, by itself, is more than worth the membership price of the entire network.
Plus, you get the rest of the network to enjoy.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month recurring.
-The technical setup of the site is excellent. You get all the mod cons you need.
-Stream a video in your choice of definition: 270, 360, 540, 720, 1080.
-Download a video in your choice of definition: 270, 360, 540, 720, 1080.
-The videos are professionally made: Crystal clear video, good sound quality (they often start a video with the stunt cock driving a car or truck, and the noises are slightly muted, so you can hear the model speaking clearly). Excellent focus. The videos are just so much nicer than some low-rent networks that offer what seems to be home-made videos.
-The models at the site and network are A-list models. (They have 1,300+ models at the network, so not all models are cute or gorgeous, but the overall mix of models is definitely A-list.)
-The photosets are offered in small, medium and large definition zip files.
The individual photos are professionally shot photos, not screen caps.
Cons:
PROS(Continued):
-No downloads limits for streaming or downloading. As far as I know. Which is becoming rare, with many sites setting daily or monthly limits.
-Content is exclusive.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are minor. This is a tiny site, but you get access to the Nubiles Porn network, which is one of the finest porn networks on the internet. Mainly because of the Nubiles.net site, which is like an encyclopedia of teen porn models.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Archive site. Last update was Dec 23, 2015.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. And matching photosets.
-The default file title gives the title of the video, but not the name of the model, the date it was posted, or the site name.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 13
Number of photosets: 13
The exact definitions of the small, medium and large photosets can vary slightly:
676px, 1127px, 3246px.
800px, 1333px, 3840px.
Video runtime: around 10-20 minutes.
-The plot of the videos is the same: a girl needs a ride, finds she forget her wallet, so she pays for the ride with sex instead of cash.
The car or truck has decals on the dashboard, which show:
"Gas, Grass or Ass
Nobody rides for free."
Which is a hint or precursor to the theme of the DriverXXX site: These girls don't have gas:
What girl is going to carry a can of gasoline with her when she is requesting a ride from Uber or Lyft?
Or carry grass, so she can get busted by the driver who's really an undercover cop or pervert?
So this is a real-life situation, where the only currency the girl has to offer is her body: SEX!!!
Since the site only has 13 videos, I don't know why they keep the site, except the videos are good, and there's no sense throwing away good content.
You will go through the site contents in less than a day.
However, you get access to the entire Nubiles Porn network, which has Nubliles.net, and around 14 other sites with over 1,300 teen videos that are top quality.
If the site was stand-alone, it would be 65 or lower.
Since the site gives you access to the Nubliles Porn network, I think the site deserves a score of 93, since Nubiles Porn is an excellent teen porn network.
Some PU members feel that a site should be scored as a stand-alone site, without reference to its network.
I believe if a site has free network access, that boosts the value of a site, because of the additional content.
But PU members are free to value or score the site however they want.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Tricky Agent is the first porn site every young adult should join.
It teaches you life lessons: how to seduce and fuck young women for free.
Also, how to lie effectively.
-Verotel is the default payment processor. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've found them reliable and helpful.
-You get access to about 14 sites in the Dirty Flix network. None of the sites require a premium upgrade.
-Content is exclusive.
-No limits on streaming or downloads.
Cons:
-The listed price (even with a PU discount) is high:
Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
1 Year: $119.95 (non-recurring)
However, during holiday specials, there are discounts:
$59.95/year is the price I joined for.
-The normal login and member pages are non-secure. But if you put "https:" in the address bar when logging in, you are secure. A tip that exotics4me gave me.
-Login details are computer generated. A random selection of characters you have to write down to get access to the site.
-There are ads on every page. Standard for porn sites.
Don't be distracted by the ads. Go for the videos you already paid for.
The ads are thumbnails of cute girls, that open a new page that invites you to join a different site. Sometimes you forget these thumbnails are ads, and click on them, hoping that will open a video at the site you're already logged into.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Tricky agent is an archive site. The last video was added on Jun 24, 2017.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The previous video was added on Nov 11, 2016. So even when the site was active, updates were sporadic.
-Small site. 57 videos. Each video has an accompanying photoset. The photosets average around 70-110 screencaps. The photosets are not worth collecting, because they are poor quality screencaps.
-They mosaic the face of the stunt cock, to add an element of verisimilitude to the videos and screencaps. Which I find annoying.
-When they film the stunt cock following and meeting the girl, the camera-work is jerky, they're shooting with a hand-held camera and the camera-man is an amateur who jiggles the camera as he walks to film the scene. The inside scenes are better, but still have the mosaic and lose focus a lot.
-I don't know if it's the mosaic disguising the head of the stunt cock or that the video is not crisp and clear, but I actually get a headache from watching videos at this site. The focus, even on the inside scenes, is not crisp and clear.
I can watch videos at most porn sites for hours.
Watching the videos at Tricky Agent I can watch for a few minutes, then I start to get a headache and it's fucking not worth watching.
-The videos are shot in Russia. There are English subtitles, so you can follow the dialog. Not a negative for me, since I enjoy reading subtitles. Other people might be annoyed by subtitles.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme: A guy offers random girls the chance to do a test shoot to get into movies.
The guy is a liar: he seduces the girls, or he has a partner who seduces the girls, but he has no ties to any legitimate movie company.
The models are young teens. Mainly attractive.
-In spite of the cute models at the site, I'm giving the site a score of 59.
-This is an archive site. One video added in 2017. Before then, update rate was sporadic.
-The sceensets are screen caps, and not worth collecting.
-The videos, for me, are unwatchable. It might be the mosaic they use to disguise the stunt cock's face. Or it might be the jerky camera work, which is most evident when filming outside scenes, but also present for inside scenes. And the focus of even the inside scenes is not a crisp and clear film, but uneven. The mosaic to disguise the stunt cocks face can move to his shirt or hand or anywhere in the screen, so parts of the monitor are blurred momentarily and the focus turns to shit.
That's what causing my headache. My eyes are trying to visualize the scene, which is out of focus, along with the blurred mosaic effect.
The videos from a few years back are not as jerky as the more recent videos. My guess is that they used a better camera-man. Even in the earlier videos, you have problems with the focus of the film, so the image is not crisp and clear. I would much rather spend my time watching better quality videos.
For me, the videos are not worth watching. The photosets are not worth viewing.
There are sites in the network that are worth viewing.
When I wrote:
"Tricky Agent is the first porn site every young adult should join.
It teaches you life lessons: how to seduce and fuck young women for free.
Also, how to lie effectively."
I hope you realize that I was being sarcastic.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Girls Under Arrest is a series or channel on the Adult Time network. Membership in the Girls Under Arrest channel gives you access to the rest of the Adult Time network, and vice versa.
-PU has a discounted price for the first month of of $14.05, recurring at $29.95/month.
-Porn sites are constantly looking for a new idea to make thier content seem fresh and appealing.
This site features young girls who have problems with the law.
-Each video has an accompanying photoset that captures the action. There is a zip file for the photoset, and also for the video.
-The channel has all the features of the Adult Time network:
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You can stream or download the videos in multiple definitions: from 160p through 1080p.
-Video runtime is from 28 to 44 minutes.
-Videos have a matching photoset that is zipped. Around 35 photos per photoset.
Cons:
-The major con is this is a small site: only 11 videos.
-The site is an archive site. Started 2018-08, last update 2019-04.
-The videos are shot POV style. Which allows for dark scenes, poor lighting, shifty camera angles, poor focus on the models because the models are moving and the camera-operator has to jiggle the cameria to follow the action.
-The photosets have a zip file, but only one definition for the zip file.
-Photosets download with a default generic numbered file name, that should be renamed if you want to know who the models are, what the scene represents.
-But the truth is, these photosets are not worth keeping. Although the video definitions range from 160p through 1080, the value of the videos is poor. Unless you enjoy watching cops abusing young girls into blowjobs and harsh fucking, in dimly lighted videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
I respect the law, and know that law enforcement officers are among the finest, bravest citizens in our great country.
I can re-count some instances of where my family inter-acted with the law and was able to see how wonderful police officers can be.
I live in a condo association. Sometimes the US mailmen make a mistake and delive a piece of mail to wrong mail box.
I brought a piece of mail to my neighbor, and told him it was his mail, delivered to my mail box.
This was a strong, good-looking cop.
He kept his right hand in his pocket the entire time I spoke with him, instead of shaking hands with me. Did he have a small gun in his pocket, in case I was a criminal?
Better safe than sorry.
I'm an older man, now in my 70s, in poor health, so I don't think I'm much of a threat.
But the cop kept his hand in his right pocket the entire time I was at his door.
Also, he asked me where I got his mail.
Implying that maybe I stole it, which would be a federal crime.
My explanation that the mail delivery people sometimes put mail into the wrong box didn't seem to impress him.
And he was right to be suspicous. I could have jimmied his mail box and stolen the letter. Even though I didn't open it, I could have been using the letter as a trick to become friendly with him, as the beginning of a scam.
Cops are taught to be suspicous of people. My action of bringing him a piece of his mail could have been a setup for some crime.
Did he thank me for giving him the mail envelope?
No.
He took it, and shut the door.
No thank you.
Another time, I saw the inside light on his truck parked on his driveway was on, and the truck was empty.
I knocked on his door, told him the inside light on his truck was on.
He went out and turned off the light.
No thank you.
No sense of appreciation.
I guess I was lucky he didn't arrest me for coming onto his property.
Maybe he could have shot me, as a dangerous suspect, if he was having a bad day or wanted to blow off steam.
A different time I was walking for exercise in my neighborhood.
Two cops stopped me, asked what I was doing.
I told them I was walking for exercise. I'm almost 70 at the time, not a big or threatening guy.
They asked me if I was on probation. I said no. They asked me again if I was on probation. I said no. They asked me again if I was on probation. I said no.
Then they asked me if I was off of probation. I said no.
They asked me what my job was, I said I was retired. They asked what my job was before I retired. I gave them my wallet, to show that I lived one street over from the current location. That might have been a mistake, because I didn't ask before I reached for the wallet in my back pocket. They could have shot me for reaching for a weapon.
The asked me a few more questions, and let me go.
This was around 2:30 PM, broad daylight. There was no curfew or law against walking on public sidewalks.
You read in the paper where cops shoot unarmed people, sometimes killing them, because the suspect seems dangerous and the cops need to protect themselves.
This happens a lot, because in United States, cops are rarely punished for killing an unarmed suspect. What is a suspect? A suspect is anyone a cop encounters who is not a cop wearing a cop uniform with a badge and gun.
The motto of the police where I live is "To protect and to serve". But I've never felt served or protected when I meet a cop. A cop is an authority figure, with a gun, and if you don't do exactly what he says, you need to have a lawyer with you, or the cop's right are more powerful than your rights. That's on a practical basis.
Many years ago, back in the 1970s, I was walking down a public street, on my way to a black college library.
A cop pulled his car in front of me, I stopped walking, the cop got out of the car, asked me where I was going, I told him I was going to the library. He told me to lean my hands on the car, and ran his hands over my body. Then he said he hadn't searched me. I didn't say anything. He told me to get into the car, I did, and he drove me to the library. It was a black community college library. I'm white. He talked to someone, and told me I could never go back to the library again.
The public library was a few miles away. The black college library was within a few blocks from where I lived. But I never went back to the black college library.
What could I do? Hire a lawyer, which costs money, so I can go the library that is closest to me?
I had very little money. A cop tells you something, you do it.
It's not worth being arrested for going to a black college library.
I have no criminal record. Except for some traffic tickets. But if a cop tells you to do something, the smart thing to do is to say "Yes, sir" and do it. Anything else can you can get into trouble.
Anyway, this site doesn't get into the real nitty gritty of dealing with cops.
This site features actors playing good ol' boy cops who are looking for kicks and maybe a little sex on the side.
REVIEW CONTINUED IN REPLY:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The channel (sites are called channels in the network) is part of the Lets Doe It network.
You get access to the entire network of 17 channels. You don't have to pay extra for access to any channel.
-Videos have a hot link to skip the intro section, which is an ad for the channel.
-The videos are professionally shot: good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control, nice sets.
But the videos are basically junk, not exciting or worth viewing or worth saving. A real disappointment, because there are some hot models, but they are wasted in stupid videos at this channel.
-The content is exclusive.
-The login and member pages are https (secure from hacking).
Cons:
-I assume the site was filmed in France. Most of the models speak in French. Which could give an exotic flavor to the porn. Except the plots are so stupid, the acting so poor, that the channel detracts from the network value.
-The channel is an archive. The last update was 2018-08-30.
-The channel is small. Only 36 scenes.
--Each scene has a matching photo set. But the photo sets are tiny. 10 photos per photo set. When the girls are very pretty, they deserve a larger number of photos in their set.
-Photo sets download with a generic computer-generated file name, such as 5e18eb4799ccd.zip. So you have to rename, to show the site, model, date posted. That's if you think the photo sets are worth collecting, which I doubt.
-Photo sets download in one definition only: no choice of low, medium or high definition. But since the photo sets are hardly worth collecting, this is a minor fault.
-The channel is one of the poorest in the network.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Most of the girls are below the attractive level of the better channels in the network. The plots are stupid. The sex is clumsy.
-If they decided to delete this channel, the overall value of the network would not be affected.
-The network has a monthly download limit of 100 videos. I don't think any of the videos are worth downloading, even when the model is cute.
Alessandra Jane, Lana Rhoades, Selvaggia and Tetti Dew Korti are some of the more attractive models featured at this channel, but none of their videos are worth saving.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
This channel is a French version of porn, where the men are complete idiots who think they are teaching young girls their proper place in life, which is to pleasure men. French chic is supposed to be sophisticated, but the teachers and principal act like adolescent boys who fumble their way through sex. So the sex is raw, and the men act like jerks.
Category is school girls.
Some of the models are cute.
But the plots are stupid.
And the sex is boring and awkward. If you have any experience watching porn, you've seen these scenes done much better, where the models are presented more attractively. Or with hotter action.
My recommendation would be for the network to delete this channel. Some of the channels have videos that feature real glamcore videos, or hotter videos. And where the plot and acting is less cringe-worthy.
I'm giving the channel a score of 59. And that is generous.
Actually, reading my previous review of the channel, that I wrote 2019-06-20, I also recommended deleting the channel, since it drags down the value of the network.
I gave the channel a score of 75 at the time. Now I'm giving it a score of 59, which better reflects my opinion of the channel's value. This is a channel that detracts from the value of the better channels in the network: The White Boxxx is an excellent glamcore channel. Bitches Abroad is a strongly erotic channel of girls having sex in Europe. A Girl Knows is a good lesbian channel with some really attractive models and enjoyable sex.
Porno Academie has some very attractive models, that are wasted in stupid videos.
The models are not presented attractively. Which degrades the value of the videos.
The plot is either stupid or boring. Which degrades the vaue of the videos.
The acting is poor.
Watching these videos is a waste of time.
They are not erotic.
They are not hot.
They are stupid shit.
(Sorry for the French language. Get the joke? You use the work "French" in polite conversation to indicate off-color activity. And this appears to be a channel shot in France.)
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 18Videoz network. You get access to the entire network of 17 sites with membership in any one of the sites.
-There is a model page for each model, with a nice-sized thumbnail to show what she looks like, along with a small listing of her physical details. But there is no model listing for the site.
There's supposed to be a way to bring up a model listing for the site, but I couldn't get it to work.
-Low membership fee of $60/year, with a PU discount. Otherwise, the listed price is $120/year.
Cons:
-18 Flesh is an archive site. The last update was in December 2011.
-Most of the 18Videoz sites are archive, that stopped updating years ago. So the quality of the videos is poor for most archive sites.
-Every so often your password is rejected. I don't know why. So you have to re-set it, which is easy to do.
-Login is secure. But the member pages are not secure.
-Ads on every page. The ads are thumbnails, that are not clearly defined as ads. If you click on an ad thumbnail, it brings up a new site for you to join.
-There is no text description of the video plot. Except the plot is little or nothing. You have a girl masturbating or exposing parts of her body, and a guy appears to have sex with her.
-You do have tags to describe the action, but they're almost un-nessary, because there's almost no plot, just sex.
-A lot of the girls are probably pretty teens or early twenties, but because of the poor picture quality, you can't appreciate how pretty these girls are.
Bottom Line:
Videos have a runtime of around 20 minutes.
Videos have a choice of 480p or 536p. On a 27" monitor, even for the higher resolution videos, the image is slightly out of focus. On a 14" monitor (such as a laptop) the image is not as much out of focus, except that I imagine most PU members would not accept viewing these videos because of the poor quality.
So the entire 18 Flesh site would be unacceptable, unless for historical interest. Or to see videos of a favorite model that retired years ago.
-There is a photo set of each video. The photo set is made up of screenshots, not photos.
There is no way to bring up the screenshots individually on your monitor. And there is no zip file for the photo set.
Years ago the site probably had a program to view the screen shots online, and probably had a zip file for the photo sets, but the online viewing program and the zip file download option seem to have disappeared.
-There is a search function to list models at the site/network, but I couldn't get it to work: couldn't bring up any model names, that fit any age range, debut date at the site or network, or dates videos were posted at the site/network.
Conclusion: site maintenance is hit or miss, mainly missing.
Bottom line summary:
The 18 Flesh site seems like a waste of opportunity and internet space.
Due to the poor quality of the videos, the videos are basically unwatchable.
There seem to be a lot of cute girls at the site, but the poor quality videos, and the screenshots you can't view onscreen or download, along with the poor search capability, make the site worthless.
They did upgrade the login to the network, and it's now https, which is secure.
But the member pages for the site/network are non-secure.
I'm giving the site a score of 58. I found nothing at the site (videos, screen caps) worth viewing.
Actually, I couldn't view any screencaps, because all I found were montages of the screen cap photosets.
And I've found much better videos at other paysites with a 536p definition that showed what the models looked like more clearly.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Small site. 25 videos. Why is that a positive? Because the videos are crap, you can see this right off from the first video to the last video. So it doesn't take a long time to realize the site is crap.
-The models at the site are Markus and Nicky. They are in all the videos. Two below-average people in looks (Markus is a plain guy, Nicky is an unappealing girl). How is that positive? Because you quickly realize that you will either find the videos appealing or not, because this is home-style porn that you either like or dislike. Not a lot of variety in the style.
-One thing that is positive is the text description of the videos: it's short, direct, and covers the plot of the video:
Examples:
"When me and Nicky got to the bath together and I touched her wet body my cock became so hard that I couldn't stand any second and not to put it in her. I even shot it on camera to remind that horny moment sometimes."
Cons:
-Joining the site directly is expensive: $29.95/month.
There are often sales that offer $14.95/month if you join the network directly, or $60/year.
Except there are better networks around that are more expensive, but offer better quality content.
-This is an archive site. The site has has 25 videos. That was the count in 2008, that is the count in 2020.
-Resetting your password is easy, if you get locked out. However, there is a captcha that is difficult to solve, and usually takes a few tries to get correct.
-Login and member pages are not secure. Your browser will probably have a popup that states the login and member pages are not secure and prone to hacking.
-Username and password are computer-generated. Can't choose your own.
Bottom Line:
The site advertises the content is 100% homemade. This is plus and minus: Plus, that you know it's probably true, because the videos are so cheaply made: cheap sets, jerky filming technique, poor lighting, a stunt cock and the girlfriend model that are, to put it kindly, below-average-in-looks.
That's the plus side.
The minus side: I look at two of the videos at the site, and that's more than enough for me.
Why would I waste my time on this crap?
Why?
Because I want to post a review to qualify for one of the raffle prizes.
That's the only reason I'm writing a review on this throw-away porn site.
The site advertising or site description is false.
Maybe I'm being harsh.
The site says the stunt cock is 23 years old, the model is 19.
That might have been true in 2008, when the site was launched, but it's now 2020, 12 years later, so the models must be slightly older today.
However, the site contents were probably shot in 2008, and have never been updated.
So, in that sense, the models were 23 and 19 when the videos were made.
The site states the model is sexy and gorgeous.
Maybe she's sexy. But gorgeous? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: To me, this is one fug ugly girl.
Porn and life is a learning experience.
I'm still learning that people can believe wildly separate things about the same object.
To call this model gorgeous is to claim that Donald Trump, our beloved president, is the kindest, most caring person in the world.
And Trump is also the most honest person in the world.
Earth shaking ideas that rattle my brain.
The videos have a posting date of 2013. That is probably a lie.
They were probably first posted around 2008, when the site was first launched. And then the posting date for the videos was changed to 2013, to make it appear that the site was updating, even though there were no updates. Some sites change the posting dates of their content to try to fool the casual viewer that the site is updating.
The site had 25 videos in 2008.
The site has 25 videos in 2020.
I can't swear the 2020 videos are the original 2008 videos, but I strongly suspect that they are the original videos.
I would give the site a score of 55.
That's being generous.
The site advertises homemade-style videos. That is true. The sets (I call them sets, but they used whatever was available: a cheap apartment, sex in a car at a park, and lots more videos at the cheap apartment in the living room, the bathroom, the bedroom.
On the positive side: with membership to this site you get access to the entire network of about 20 sites. Almost all the sites are going for the homestyle vibe. Many of the sites are throw-away sites that no longer update. There are a number of cute models, and maybe you can find some videos worth watching. But I would rather spend more money and find a network with better quality content that I can enjoy more.
The network is surprisingly large, with 3,258 videos, around 20 sites.
Mostly the sites go for a home-based amateur style of shooting: cheap sets, teen-based porn that requires little scripting, not a lot of care put into making the models or videos look good.
The vibe is home-based videos. Except a lot of the girls are cute, and the videos could be so much better if they changed their style to make the girls more attractive, to upgrade the videos with better lighting and equipment.
Actually, that is what the network has been doing with a few of the sites that still update: they are changing the video approach from home-style to more mainstream style: better lighting, better sets, that present the models more attractively. So if you joined the network, and have the time, there are videos that are worth watching.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-This is not a pro. But you should join the network through the TMW (Teen Mega World) site, instead of one of the network satellite sites.
If you join directly through the TMW site itself, the search engine searches the entire network for the content of a model.
If you join through one of the satellite sites, your search is often limited to the site you joined through, instead of searching the entire network. So finding the content of a model is difficult and time-consuming, because you would have to search all 35 sites in the network if you joined through one of the satellite sites. And those searches would be basically worthless, since you would probably only get the model's content at the site you joined through.
-This is not a pro. but it's worth mentioning: This is the first site/network that has a non-secure version and a secure version. Seems like a waste of space, they should delete the non-secure version, which your browser will notify you is open to hacking.
Cons:
PROS(START OF):
-Site is part of the TMW network (Teen Mega World), which has 35 sites (counting TMW as one of the sites).
-Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites. There are no premium sites that cost extra to access.
-Network covers most teen niches: boy-girl, boy-2 girls, lesbian, creampie, anal, 4K site, VR site, massage, squirting, etc.
-A list of the sites you get access to is shown in the reply section to this review.
-Each video has a matching photoset.
-Videos have a choice of downloading of 270p, 480p, 720p definition.
CONS(START OF):
-The search is flawed if you join through one of the satellite sites instead of the main TMW site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
If you join directly one of the other network sites, your search will be limited to the site you joined through, instead of the entire network. The search will probably still be limited to your join site, even when you log in to one of the other network sites. I say probably, because the search results seem hit-or-miss when you use the search engine, depending on random factors.
-This is an archive site. The last update was in September 2009.
-Small site: 73 videos.
-The videos are poor quality: They were shot when the network was a low-rent teen hardcore site, where the video equipment was basic, the settings were cheap apartment rooms, the furniture was cheap.
-The videos have to be downloaded. You can't stream them online.
-No zip file for the photosets. So you would have to manually download each photo. Since the last photoset was posted in 2009, the quality of the photosets is low, and the photosets are not worth collecting, even when the girl is cute.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Vendo, a proprietary biller. I prefer CCBill or Epoch, which are easy to cancel, but I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem.
-Login details (username and password) are randomly generated characters, instead of a name and password you choose yourself.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site theme: girls masturbating with toys: the toys can include dildos, with and without batteries, or bottles, or fruits or vegetables, fingers.
This site is one of the poorer sites in the network.
The site was started in late 2008, and the last update was less than a year later, in September 2009.
So the videos and photosets are old, made when the network was basically a low-rent collection of cheaply made hardcore teen videos. No effort has been made to update the site to make it user-friendly.
Most sites in the network offer a choice of streaming or downloading.
This site does not offer streaming: you have to download each video and play it on your computer software program.
There is a matching photoset for each video, but there is no zip file. So you would have to manually download each individual photo. Except since the photos are show the models in cheap settings (cheap apartment room, cheap furniture, inexpensive street clothes), and no effort is made to make the girls appear attractive, the photos are not worth collecting.
Does the site have any value?
There is curiosity value: the site is an example of when the network was a low-rent collection of cheaply made hardcore teen videos.
Also, it shows, because there is no streaming option, and no zip file for the photosets, how the network in general has vastly improved over the years with easier navigation choices, improved-quality videos and photosets.
And, if you join this site directly, you will realize how messed up the search engine can be, because your search will probably be limited to the contents of this specific site, instead of a search that covers the entire network. So finding and accessing the content of each model would be a nightmare, because: 1. you wouldn't be able to find most of the models content at the network; 2. you would have a hell of a time accessing the model's content at other sites in the network, because you would have to log in to each individual site, and then scroll through the individual content pages to find the model's videos, before you could view it.
So do yourself a favor, and join through the main TMW site itself, where the search covers the entire network, and accessing the model's content is made easy.
Giving the site a score of 50, as a warning to PU users not to join this site directly, but to join the main TMW site.
The TMW network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, and I've joined it numerous times.
But the network did an upgrade a few years ago, which was a step backwards in the search and navigation of the network, if you joined one of the network satellite sites, instead of the main TMW site.
The customer service was kind enough to give me a free membership to the TMW site, because I'm paying for an annual membership to the Teen Sex Movs site. I need the TMW site access, because of the navigation problems the network update created.
And I'm locked in to the Teen Sex Movs membership, because I got such a low annual price membership.
(It would be nice if they switched my membership to the TMW site itself, with my low-membership price, but they didn't. So each year I write customer service, explaining that I have an annual membership to Teen Sex Movs site, which gives me access to the entire network, but I need a free membership to TMW to make using the network easier.)
Sir, thanks for checking up on me
My health hasn't been very good lately, so I have been spending a lot less time at the PU site. Getting old, I guess. I'm close to 80.
But a pretty girl is still able to make my heart beat faster.
LOL.
Take care of yourself.
You don't appreciate how important good health is, until it starts to go away.
But I hope I have a few good years left for me, to enjoy the world of porn.
I don't remember the sites from 10 years ago.
The star of the network, in my opinion, is the nubiles.net site, which is like an encyclopedia of young starlets just starting out in porn.
That is the main reason I subscribe to this network.
The PU internal email system has been broken for years.
I know for a fact that many of the emails I've sent through the PU internal email system were never delivered.
In a normal email system, if an email you sent is not delivered, you get an automatic message stating your email was not delivered.
But not for the PU internal email system.
So, unless the intended recipient responds in some way, letting you know he/she never got the email, you don't know if they ever got it.
PU needs to hire an expert to continually work on the site update it to keep it working.
But I don't think they have the money to fix the problems.
I was told years ago that the coding for the PU site was written in an old software language that not many coders use any more.
So that's part of the problem. The PU system is breaking down, and that's why all members are now listed as newbies, with 0 reviews to their name, because the software program that kept track of the number of reviews a member had accepted stopped working. Or why you can't review a site in less than a year, even though the rules say that you can review a site in 6 months after your previous review of the site.
But at least the site is still here, even though many of the fine members we used to have have vanished.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
