Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discounted price of $19.98/month instead of the regular price of $29.95/month.
-Moms Teach Sex is part of the Nubiles Porn network. So you get access to all the Nubiles Porn network sites, which is 17 different sites.
-The network sites are listed in the first reply to this review.
-The site (Moms Teach Sex) features exclusive videos.
-The photo sets can be downloaded in large, medium or small definition. The recent sizes are:
Large 5760x3840px
Medium 2000x1333px
Small 1200x800px
The videos can be downloaded in 270 - 1080 p, for all the videos, even the ones posted in 2013.
The videos can be streamed online in 270 - 1080 p, for all the videos, even the ones posted in 2013.
-The videos are professionally shot, but the matching photo sets are a waste of time. I assume the photo sets were generated by a computer program from the video, because the composition of many of the photos is poor.
-No download limit.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale. But this is standard for porn sites.
-Slow update rate. Currently 2 new videos per month.
-Small site. 106 videos. Plus the matching photo sets, plus
-Not much effort was put into choosing the step-mother and the young female for their looks. They aren't gorgeous or pretty, but average-looking. Personally, I like pretty young girls, or very attractive older women, and none of these models would win any beauty pageants.
But maybe that is a positive, because it adds an element of reality to the videos: you can't always expect the young female or the mother to be attractive.
Except that in these cases, don't expect either the young woman or the older woman to be attractive.
They are pieces of meat that might satisfy a male in heat.
Actually, there are a few younger female models that could be attractive, but no effort is made to make them attractive.
For example, Kyler Quinn can be very attractive. But in the video titled "How To Fuck Your Mom - S11:E5",
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
it's like they actually made an effort to tone down her appeal, to make her plain-looking.
I don't understand the reason to make a young female model less attractive in a sex video or photo set.
Maybe they are trying to inject an element of reality-porn, where attractive models like Katie Kush, in "Special Delivery - S10:E8", are less attractive, so they are happy to have sex without any lead-in or setup, and accept the step-mother teaching how to jack a guy off.
Whatever.
I would prefer the site to make the models as attractive as possible, instead of as plain as possible.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): MomsTeachSex gives exclusive videos showing that a mother's love can know no bounds. Here is proof that when a mother thinks that her daughter (or stepdaughter) does not know how to satisfy her daughter's boyfriend, the mother is willing to make the ultimate sacrifice, and teach the daughter how to arouse and satisfy the young man. What greater love can there be, beyond a mother and daughter having sex with a young stud?
If you enjoy threesomes, or MILFs having sex with their daughter and the daughter's boyfriend, then this site hits that niche.
There are also examples of a mother teaching her step son how to enjoy sex with a young woman.
So, there is fake incest (step mother with step son or step daugher), MILF (the step mother), lesbian activity (the step mother with the young step daughter or the step son's female partner).
Whatever niche turns you on.
This is a small site (106 videos currently) with a slow update rate that is currently 2 new videos per month.
The site started late 2013.
So, with a slow update rate, it will only grow very slowly.
However, you get access to the entire Nubiles Porn network, which means you have access to a large amount of porn videos and photo sets.
I'm not sure why the site offers both a matching photo set and a matching screen shot set.
The quality of the photo set is not great.
That is a very subjective opinion.
However, if you study a photo set, you will find that, although the photos are focused, the photos were probably made from the video with a computer program: I doubt the photos were shot with a camera by a professional photographer, because too many of the composed shots are just plain lousy.
So, if the photo sets are poor, why bother with a screen shot set?
It makes no sense.
I don't think the photo sets are worth collecting.
And the screen shots are even less worth collecting.
The screen shots are just a waste of bandwith, a waste of site space.
Since I prefer pretty or attractive models, this site has little interest for me.
However, as I said, if you are into MILFs, or fantasize about a step-mother in a three-some with her step-daughter or step-son, then the site might appeal to you.
There can also be some lesbian action between the step-mom and the younger woman.
I'm giving the site a score of 79.
The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, the sets are not glamorous but not the cheapest, the audio is good.
But the photo sets are poor. Poor composition, and the models are not made to look attractive.
OK, I finally get it. The videos and photo sets are supposed to be a slice of reality. This is supposed to be reality porn: that's why the models are made to look plain, like ordinary people, instead of like attractive models.
And it also explains why the camera gives weird point-of-view sequences, where you, the porn viewer, are supposed to be a fly-on-the wall, so you see the action unfolding from a distance, from looking down, from other viewpoints instead of the regular porn videos you normally watch.
Except I'm more used to the regular, normal way of viewing a porn video.
I'm giving the site a score of 79.
That's because:
-the site is small, with a slow update rate.
-the models are made to look plain, instead of trying to make them attractive.
And many or most of the models are plain, to begin with.
-There are other sites in the network that present their models more attractively, that also feature the fake-incest theme, and can also have a bit of old-young theme.
Read the first reply to see listing of sites included in the Nubiles-Porn network:
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to about 20 sites, most of which stopped updating years ago.
-Nubiles Porn network is a teen-oriented network, featuring a lot of cute teens. Many of the models were real teens (18 or 19) at the time the videos were shot.
-Access to any one of the sites gives you access to the entire network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The content is exclusive.
-The listed price is $199/year. But during holiday specials, you can find memberships for $84/year, or $9.95 for the first month. All those options include full streaming and downloading privileges.
Cons:
-The main con, for me, is the stupid plots and stupid dialogue. The videos are supposed to be funny. I think they are just stupid.
-If you can get past the stupid plots and stupid dialogue, the rest of the cons are fairly minor.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-When you enter the members area, the first page you see is filled with ads for other sites.
So you have to click through that ad page to get to the members home page.
-Ads for other sites on every member page. Standard for most porn sites.
-There is a model's page for each model. But aside from links to her videos, there is very little data on the model. Her name, a few physical stats, that's it. The bio information is bullshit:
Here's the bio for Ivy Rein:
"Seductive Russian Ivi Rein is enjoying a gap year before grad school, and she's making sure to experience all the things she's been wanting to do. Flaunting her pretty pink nipples and soft bare pussy on camera is part of her thrill.
Bottom Line:
The videos are supposed to be parodies, which are supposed to be funny. I hate them. I think the plots are stupid, the dialogue is stupid. So I can't enjoy the videos.
There are other sites where I think the videos can be cute or entertaining or enjoyable. But not at this site or the parodies at other sites in the Nubiles Porn network.
That's my reaction.
I saw Thor: Love and Thunder a couple of days ago. I walked out of the movie after about 30 minutes, because I thought the movie was stupid. It's a matter of taste. I grew up on Superman and western series on TV in the 1950s, and enjoyed them. But many of the comics in the movies today are completely different in tone and style and meaning from what was made 20 years or more ago.
If you watch the parodies at Family Swap and enjoy them, that's your style, and I'm fine with that. Different strokes for different folks. I can understand that.
But, for me, Family Swap is a waste of time.
I much prefer the Family XXX site at New Sensations network, or the other sites at New Sensations, which take a less humorous approach, and also focus on the physical beauty of the models more selectively.
Giving the Family Swap site a score of 78. You get access to the entire network of teen sites, but there is a lot of content that doesn't fit my tastes.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloads. Getting to be rare for porn sites.
-Videos are available in
-Exclusive content.
-Easy login if you have cookies enabled. Just click the login link, and you enter the member's area, without having to enter any login details manually.
-You have your choice of definitions from 270p through 1080p. Some of the newer videos have a 4K option. That is for streaming and downloading.
-There is a photoset for each video. The photosets average around 100 photos per set.
-There is a model page, with some basic information: the model's age, country, height. But little else about the model, other than links to her videos.
Cons:
-The main con is the site stopped updating in 2021. Before that, the update rate was very slow, averaging one new video every few months.
-Although Nubiles Porn is a teen-oriented network, most of the female models in the videos are in their 20s or 30s. So this is a chance to see some older females in the videos, if that's your niche.
-The videos are basically parodies. The plots are stupid and unbelievable, but you're supposed to be laughing while watching the videos. For me, the stupid plots and stupid dialogue destroys the pleasure of watching these videos.
Bottom Line:
The site is an archive site. It has 39 videos, with matching photosets.
If you can turn off your brain and ignore the stupid plots and stupid dialogue, the site gives you good to high quality videos: excellent focus, good lighting and colors, nice sets, good sound. The sex is basically bread and butter: not over the top gymnastics, but basic sex: cock sucking, pussy and breast licking, vaginal sex. Not a lot of affection shown in the videos: they are basically hump and fuck.
The kicker is supposed to be fucking your older teacher. The female models are supposed to be teens, but many of them are actually in their 20s. The teachers are mainly in their 20s or 30s, so they aren't much older than the "teens" they are fucking.
The site does have some cute models, such as Lucy Doll, Jessa Rhodes, Alexis Monroe, Piper Perri and others. But I can't get past the stupid plots and stupid dialogue to enjoy the videos.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. So you get access to all the New Sensations sites.
-Unlimited streaming. Downloads are limited to 300 GB, which is generous.
-You can stream videos in 720p and 1080p, with multiple bit rates for each definition.
-You can download videos in 720p and 1080p, with multiple bit rates for each definition.
-You get a nice, short text description of the plot of the video, plus tags for the video that can be used to search for your sex niches and fetishes.
Cons:
-Site stopped updating around 10-10-2018.
-Site gives me slow download speeds. I have a 200 Mbps connection, but my wireless connection can drop to 9 Mbps.
Theoretically, I've read that the minimum speeds required for:
SD (480p): 3+ Mbps.
HD (720–1080p): 5–13+ Mbps.
4K (UHD, 2160p): 16–25 Mbps.
So even 9 Mbps, which my wireless speed can drop to, should be fine for 720p videos.
But it doesn't work that way.
On my monitor, the stream is not smooth for 720p. And if I try to fast forward the video, the playback will stop completely.
The way to get around slow streaming speeds is to download the video, and play the file on your PC.
The technical features of some of the videos are top-quality. They have plot and some special effects and good to excellent video, nice sets, nice costumes, etc.
Bottom Line:
The videos at Parody Pass don't have a single focus or tone: they might try to be serious, or comical, or stupidly funny.
In contrast, the stories at Pure Taboo, a site in the Adult Time network, can be interesting and add to the impact of the sex. The Pure Taboo videos are trying to create an artistic, erotic visual experience where the sex is illicit. The Pure Taboo site is probably the finest story-driven porn site I've seen.
Candide, a novel by Votaire, published in 1759, was a satire on the Leibniz philosophy of optimism. The novel Candy, by Terry Southern and Mason Hoffenberg, written around 1958, was supposed to be a satire of Candide.
Candide, and Candy, are both considered comical, or humorous. I read them years ago, and enjoyed both of them. The humor is not really laugh-out-loud funny. More a quiet humor that, "Oh, I get the idea, and it's nice".
The Sex Files #2 is an imitation of The X-Files with sex.
My idea of parody movies include Airplane!, Blazing Saddles, Young Frankenstein, Hot Shots!. A movie where you get exaggerated ideas or acting that is supposed to be funny or enjoyable.
"The Sex Files #2" is not funny for me. It's not enjoyable. It's a waste of time.
On reflection, I realize that by "parody" what they mean is "imitation". The Sex Files #2 is an imitation of The X-Files. It was not meant to be funny, but interesting and enjoyable. Spiced with sex. But at 2 hours runtime, I was bored.
Reasons why I don't like the site:
I don't appreciate the humor of the videos.
I've never followed most of the TV shows that are parodied.
So the parodies don't strike a chord in my mind, that makes me laugh or appreciate the points being parodied.
Also, some of the parodies are just not funny.
The technical qualities of the videos are good to excellent. The acting by the models is OK for porn videos, which sets a low bar for acting. The sets are nice, the filming is done professionally: good focus, good lighting, good sound control, nice colors.
I'm giving the site a score of boring 78. That's a new category for boring sex and boring videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A while back, they increased the size and brightness of the thumbnails illustrating the videos on the public page. That makes the videos seem much more appealing, the models look more appealing.
-The network and site are teen-oriented. They have mainly Eastern European teens, and most of them are cute or attractive. That is the main value of the site and network, how attractive these models are.
-Since the site is so tiny (only 21 videos), navigation is simple but basic. They use the same layout for all the network sites, listing 12 thumbnail per page. The thumbnails are hotlinks to the videos.
-Exclusive content. But this doesn't have the value that it used to have. Tube sites feature porn from almost all major and minor hardcore porn sites (edited videos, but not the photosets).
-No cross-sell on the rejoin page. I searched the page, but couldn't find a pre-checked cross-sale to some other porn site. Will have to check to see if I overlooked the cross-sale later.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Verotel is the billing agent I used. They have been responsive within a single day, when I emailed them with 2 different problems I had with my membership. Not only fast, but they actually read what my problem was, and responded to it. Many times, a billing agent, or even customer service, will give you a garbled response for help, which is worthless.
CONS(START OF):
-Sometimes, when you try to login, you get a non-secure login page. Put https in front of the address bar, and your login changes to a secure login page. (This tip came from exotics4me).
-Tiny site. Only 21 videos.
-Archive site. Site stopped updating in 2014.
-The member pages show tiny thumbnails that are low-quality gifs of the video. They really need to enlarge and update the gifs to make the videos seem more attractive, because it degrades the experience of using the site. You're paying for a porn site, you deserve a quality product. Maybe years ago they could have gotten away with cheap-looking
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
product, who's going to pay for it? Either upgrade the site contents, to make it seem attractive, or delete it.
However, there are people who seem to enjoy unattractive photos and videos and low-rent porn, so if the owners/operators can attract paying members, I guess they figure that's good enough to sell.
-There is a photoset of each video. The photoset is a computer-generated series of screenshots of the video. It's a surprisingly good program that creates the screenshots, since the screenshots are nicely centered on the action. But the quality of the screenshots is just OK. The teen models can be surprisingly attractive. I realize I'm being unrealistic, but many of these models could pose for Metart or Femjoy or any glamor site, and they are instead put into junk porn.
-The login details are computer generated. You don't choose your username and password.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
You get access to the entire Dirty Flix network. This site and the network has a lot of attractive teen models from Eastern Europe.
The main negatives:
Tiny site. Only 21 videos.
Archive site. Stopped updating in 2014.
The quality of the videos is low-rent. That's the impression. Maybe I'm being overly harsh. The technicals are not poor, they just seem poor. The sound control is lousy, which is the most obvious problem.
I'm giving the site a score of 78. Years ago the site had more value, when cheap porn was first being presented on the internet. But for many years now, you can find porn paysites that offer good to excellent quality porn. So this site is a throw-away. Since you paid for the network, you can see if any of the site videos appeal to you. But there are better sites in the network that you have access to.
Note: I am giving you my honest opinion of the site.
But you are allowed to give comments on the videos.
And almost all of the member comments are positively glowing.
After thinking it over, I realize I was turned off by the site theme of degrading these lovely teens, not treating them with respect or tenderness. Which is stupid, on my part. If you enjoy watching attractive teens treated like trash, this site has strong value. The treatment is not overly harsh or rough, it's just the attitude that we're hep guys who can treat these cute sluts like the trash they are.
Second Note: I'm not a fan of ads, but some of the thumbnails of the models used in the ads for other sites are fucking lovely. If you like teens, you can drool over the images of these lovely teens.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the network sites.
-Network has 1517 movies, 779 models, 1514 photosets. Most of the models are young teens. Many are very attractive.
-Newer movies have both MP4 and WMV file format for downloads. The MP4 format has more options for definition. MP4 has a file definition for Sony PSP, iPhone3 and iPod, a higher definition for iPhone4+ and iPad and Android, then 1080p for Mac and PC, and 4K version.
For steaming, the same movie only has 240p, 720p, 1080p.
That seems like plenty of optins for both streaming and downloading.
But if you're a high-end enthusiast, you're probably going with the 4K, which is only available for downloads, not streaming.
-Regular price for the site (and network) is high:
$120/year
$30/month
But you can find a yearly price of $60/year during holiday specials.
Or $15/month if you don't want a year-long membership.
-There is a zip file for each photoset.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can favorite your favorite movies.
-Navigation is basically simple. You can list the movies by chronology, top rated, most downloaded, etc. Search engine is basic, but does the job.
CONS(START OF):
-Login is not secure. Your browser shows a popup message, when you enter your login details,
"This connection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
A poor way to reward your members who pay for a membership.
-The site update rate is irregular. They tried to update with 2-4 updates per month in 2019 or earlier, but when covid hit, the updates slowed to 1-2 per month. That's for movies. Each movie normally comes with a photoset.
Bottom Line:
X Sensual theme is young girls having sex. With a boy, with another girl, one guy with 2 girls, one girl with 2 guys.
The main draw of the site (and network) is the cute young girls. They are mainly young teens (18-19), and attractive.
They call the videos movies. There's not much plot. You have one or two girls, one or two guys.
They usually start with clothes. There's very little dialog or talking. The girl or girls grab the guy and kiss him and undress him. (There's no seduction or lead-in to the sex. You watch these videos and realize: why bother with plot: let's get to the good stuff, already. And these Russian teens go with the script, which calls for the girls and guys to strip within the first 2-3 minutes and, with maybe some kisses and touches thrown in, start to lick and suck and fuck.
The site title is "X Sensual", but a more apt title would be "Let's Fuck". Because I didn't find much sensual or teasing build-up to the sex.
You can find videos where there's more of a lead-in. That's because the girl or guy is alone, he or she is taking a shower, he or she gets dressed, and then the girl or guy shows up, they talk for a couple of minutes, the girl loosens the guy's belt, pulls down his pants, and starts sucking on his dick.
Actually, the bare-bones plots are probably the result of covid.
If you watch the videos posted in 2019 and earlier, there was more interaction between the models before the sex. There was often some seduction, playfulness, teasing, and the sex scenes were better.
The sets were better. More varied. More expensive-looking. They didn't use the cheap apartments, but apartments that looked nice, or the setting starts in a park, before they move to a nice apartment.
Instead of trying to improve the videos, the site, because of covid, was trying to save money by producing cheaper videos with low-rent apartment buildings, low-rent furniture, and using a plot where you find girls and guys having sex, instead of having some interaction between the players before the sex.
Bare-bones sex becomes boring after a while.
And the cheap sets and cheap clothes the models wear doesn't help.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
The videos from 2019 and earlier are much better to watch than the videos posted in 2020 and later. More build-up to the sex, nicer sets, they were trying to create a quality sex video, instead of mass-produced, cheap sex tapes they've been shooting starting around 2020.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Ashlynn Brooke.com is a site in the New Sensations network. Join New Sensations, and you get access to the entire network. No premium sites you have to pay extra for. Or join any one of the included sites, and you get access to the entire New Sensations network.
-Unlimited downloads and unlimited streaming.
-You can create a favorites list of videos.
-Navigation is basically simple. It's a small site, only 101 videos (plus a photoset for each video). You can arrange the scenes chronologically, or alphabetically by title.
-The scenes are professionally shot: nice sets, good lighting, good camera-work, good colors, good sound control. So the scenes are good quality. But since the last update was back in 2014, the definitions are only offered in 720p and 1080p, which might be a turn-off for some viewers.
Cons:
-The main con is the site stopped updating years ago. Probably around 2014.
-Ashlynn Brooke is a cute blonde with a pretty face and large breasts (enhanced, but not as obviously fake as some bolt-ons I've seen).
The videos at the site were made from DVDs. Videos were posted at the site from 07/09/2008 through 05/26/2014.
-The update rate was very irregular. I guess they added a new video when they felt like it.
-This is a small site. 101 scenes plus a photoset for each scene.
-The site is called the "official site" of Ashlynn Brooke, "featuring my personal videos and photosets". But the personal videos are from DVDs of Ashlynn Brooke, not homemade personal videos of Ashlynn that a fan might be hoping for. And the photosets are almost certainly screenshots from the DVD scenes, not from a professional photographer who was shooting the model.
Bottom Line:
This is a small site dedicated to a solo model, Ashlynn Brooke.
Scenes (videos) are offered in 720p and 1080p, with each definition offered in 2 or 3 bit rates.
There is a photoset that offers a partial record of the video.
I believe the photosets are made from screenshots of the video, not by a professional photographer shooting individual photos. So the photos are not as crisp and clear as a good photo can be.
Photosets range from 30 to 180 photos per set.
Unless you're a fan of Ashlynn Brooke, I don't think the photosets are worth collecting.
Scenes have minimal plots. A guy is licking and caressing Ashlynn Brooke and he fucks her in different positions, and she gets in some cocksucking at different times.
Or Ashlynn Brooke is with a woman, and they are making out and then having sex.
The two women might talk for a minute or two or even three, but then they start touching each other, and you know where that leads to.
Or Ashlynn Brooke is with two guys, and they start to have sex.
She tries to keep it interesting, by changing her costumes, changing her partners.
She's a very pretty woman, but the sex gets to be monotonous after a while.
And since this is an archive site, there are no new updates since 2014.
I don't think Ashlynn Brooke, the model, ever participated at the site personally.
All the site offered was scenes from Ashlynn Brooke DVDs, and the accompanying photosets.
There was no personal participation, such as a blog, where she answered fan mail, or posted her thoughts or ideas.
Since you're a member of the New Sensations network, and this is one of the included sites, you can browse the scenes, to see how much you enjoy them. But I think the site is mainly for Ashlynn Brooke fans.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Prime network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network. You don't have to pay extra for any premium sites.
-Video definition is 540p through 4K.
-Zip file for the photoset of the video.
-High production values: Even though the site specializes in shooting dark videos and photosets (are they trying to save electric bills?), the costumes are expensive, the sets are expensive, the background music is tasteful, there is ample use of oils for sensuous massages and sensual fucking.
Cons:
-Small site. Only 19 videos (plus matching photosets).
-Slow update rate.
-Captcha required for login.
-Pre-checked cross-sales on join pages.
Bottom Line:
-Video content: 19 videos.
-Video runtime: averages around 30-32 minutes.
-Photosets: 19 photosets.
-Photosets run around 134 photos per set.
Site theme: Sex is sinful. Forget that sex is needed to make children, which is God's plan to replentish the earth after adults die. The site shows how people with twisted desires are having all kinds of dirty, evil sex: Blowjobs, pussy eating, masturbation, handjobs, pussy fingering, orgies, bondage, this site shows how men and women can cheat on their partners, and fall into temptation while doing the devil's work. There's also vaginal and anal sex.
The site features videos with not only dark themes, but dark lighting as well.
You have boy/girl sex, threesomes, one guy with multiple girls, lots of oil to make the naked bodies glisten with passion.
This is stylized glamcore. Trying for an aesthetic vision of raw, sinful sex.
I'm repeating myself, but I saw Emmanuelle (1974), the French softcore movie with Sylvia Kristel, and Story of O (1975), also a French softcore movie. Both of those movies had a visual and emotional impact that was undeniable. I believe the 1970s was the golden age of porn (except that the internet in the 1990s and beyond has also produced a huge amount of high quality softcore and hardcore content).
The great thing about Emanuelle and Story of O was the plot made sense, the acting was acceptable to good, the models/actors were extremely attractive, the colors and images were crisp and clear. I bought DVDs of those 2 movies from Amazon, and the DVDs were degraded copies of the original movies. A shame. Because those 2 movies were impressive.
Sinful Raw videos and photos use dark lighting to try to make the scenes erotic and sensual.
The sex is supposed to be sinful.
I think the stylized approach of the site is pretentious.
I appreciate the simpler style of Massage Rooms, where the scenes are more brightly lit, so you can see the models more clearly. I mean, if you have attractive models, let me see them.
Except that the models at Sinful Raw are not the most attractive models you've ever seen: so maybe the darkness helps to hide the blemishes, age wrinkles, whatever, and your imagination is supposed to be fired into thinking these are godesses who are getting fucked.
Except my imagination is limited, and I prefer the Massage Rooms videos, where I can see the lovely models, and see them getting massaged sensually, and then getting fucked sensually. Or getting fucked energetically. But let me see and admire and crave the bodies of lovely young models, instead of squinting in the dark to see what the model looks like.
Maybe they should have the models fucking in a dark closet. Then I could use my imagination, instead of trying to see what the models look like. To see what the models are supposed to be doing. I know they are supposed to be doing naughty things, but it would help to be able to see the naughty things they are doing in the dark.
Pure Taboo, a site in the Adult Time network, often uses dark lighting, which is also supposed to heighten the erotic mood. But Sinful Raw goes overboard with the darkness, and you often can't see what the performers look like, or what they are supposed to be doing.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
It's a tiny site. Currently 19 videos and matching photosets.
The idea of stylized hardcore glamour is good, but they go overboard with the darkness.
The videos show high technical qualities, except you can't clearly see the models because it's too fucking dark.
I much prefer Pure Taboo, a competing site from a competing network. Pure Taboo is probably the finest story-driven hardcore site on the internet. The Sinful Raw site videos don't have much of a story: you see models fucking, and you're supposed to think there's some story behind the fucking.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The stand-alone Filthy POV site is streaming only. But the Adult Time channel for Filthy POV has both unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading (if you have downloading privileges with your membership in Adult Time).
-The stand-alone Filthy POV site content is supposed to be exclusive. But the Adult Time channel for Filthy POV has some content from other sites mixed in, so it's not entirely exclusive.
-All scenes are available in 360p SD through 1080p. And they are now offering 4K definition for people with ultra-high definition monitors.
-Some scenes might have a plot that adds to the interest: A brother might blackmail his stepsister into having sex. However, many of the videos at the Filthy POV channel seem to have the plot cut out, and the scenes start with off with hardcore sex, with no buildup.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Some videos have an accompanying phtoset. But the photoset is poor-quality screen shots: poor lighting, cheap sets, a limited number of screen shots per set. Not worth collecting, even when the model is cute.
-Photosets average around 15 screenshots per set.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is below average. The site is going for a trailer-trash vibe, not presenting the models as attractive women, but as sluts who are getting banged.
-There is no text description of a video.
-There are no tags to describe or define the video.
-Little to none model info.
Bottom Line:
124 videos currently.
Video runtime is from 10 to 20 minutes. My guess is that they've edited the original videos to cut out the build-up to the sex, and start many of the videos with the sex scenes. Which is both good and bad: good, for fans who want to skip the buildup and view the hardcore sex. Bad, because the the buildup could give meaning to the sex.
Without the plot build-up, the scene is just two or more bodies having sex, with very little meaning.
You have Dixie Lynn, Sofie Reyez, Karah Brooke, Jocelyn Stone, Melody Marks, cute or attractive girls, sucking cock, but there's no basis for the sex, and it gets boring fast.
I much prefer the Jays POV channel in Adult Time, which makes an effort of selecting cute teen models, and also includes a plot build-up where the stunt cock seduces the girls into having sex, or the girl seduces the guy.
The sets and costumes at Jays POV are nicer, not trying for the trailer trash vibe.
The lighting and colors of the videos at Jays POV are brighter, and the girls look so much better.
Filthy POV is a channel in the Adult Time network.
It's also a standalone site.
I'm writing about the Filthy POV channel in the Adult Time network.
Which apparently has a lot of the video content found in the separate Filthy POV site.
Note: some of the videos that are listed under the Filthy POV channel are originally from other sites.
A few from FilthyKings, RoccoSiffredi, Spizzo.com.
But most of the content is from the FilthyPOV site.
Most of the models are white, but you get some latina, some black.
Most of the models are probably in their twenties, but you get some teens, some grannies.
These models are not selected for their looks, unless you consider trailer trash as the target look.
You get a wide variety of themes in this channel, and a wide variety of female performers.
The overall theme is trailer trash: slutty models, young and old, who are showing the dirty side of sex.
Fake incest: step-relations having sex. Teen and twenty-something models having sex with young and older guys. Grannies. Lots of models with tats. Cuckold. Punishment. Blowjobs. Anal. Oversized titties. Whatever.
The models are basically shown as sluts who like their sex down and dirty.
No attempt is made to make the models attractive or glamorous.
There are a few cute teen models in the catalog who seem to have wandered into the site by mistake, but
they show they belong in this site because they have fake-incest with their step family or show other perversions.
If you're into dirty sex, perverted sex, then you can watch in 4K video, which should satisfy connoisseurs of raw hardcore porn.
I'm giving the Filthy POV channel a score of 78. I don't appreciate the trailer-trash vibe of the site.
I don't like the editing that cuts out the build-up to the sex.
I like my models to be young and attractive, and the models at this site are basically a much less attractive group of women than the Jays POV models.
The plots at Jays POV site can be repetitious, but the models are yummy, and the sets and lighting are clean.
The sets at Filthy POV are cheap, the models are presented at sluts, the lighting is dim.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site is part of the X Empire network of 5 sites.
So you get access to 5 sites with your membership.
-The good-quality photosets have a zip file.
-There are model indexes: one for the network, a different index for each individual site.
-The model's page has links to her videos.
-There is a cheaper streaming membership. Downloads require a more expensive membership.
-Videos come with lots of tags describing the video. They have a text description of the video that's so brief it's worthless.
For example, the complete text description for a Scarlit Scandal video is: "Scarlit Scandal loves her ass spanked while she's being fucked and Jax Slayher makes sure to turn Scarlit's cheeks red as he plunges his piece deep into her pussy." The tags do a much better job describing the video.
-Members can add comments on the model's page. Useless, except for fans wanting to show their appreciation of the model.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-No information for the models (except for a generic name).
-Ads on member pages. Easy to ignore, because they are placed at the bottom of the page.
-Most of the models at the site are White, but there are a few Black, Asian, and Latina models.
Bottom Line:
The site is based on real life events (I read that from a motion picture, but it adds meaning to the sex shown in these videos: think of your sister, your mother, your grandmother, exploding with lust when they are with the women of their dreams.)
The site theme is lesbian sex.
The sex featured at Lesbian X is young teens and MILFs, so you get a mix of young teens and attractive older women.
The site has 140 videos.
Videos have your choice of definition from 360p through 4K. The 4K option was added a few years back for the newer posted videos. Before that, the highest resolution was 1080p.
You can stream the full video, or a trailer for video.
There is an accompanying photoset for each video.
Photosets range from 99 photos to over 400 photos.
The soundtrack for many of the videos is an overpowering music beat. Either turn the volume down, or mute the volume and put on the song "I Want To Know What Love Is" by Foreigner, to heighten the mood. That song is a much better background than the canned music in these lesbian videos.
The videos are standard lesbian videos: lots of kissing, licking, sucking, stroking, some use of toys. The models are surprisingly clean: not a lot of tattoos, not a lot of models with over-large breast implants. The sets and costumes are nice.
I thought the lesbian videos were pretty much plain vanilla: although the models are making lots of noises to show excitement, the videos lack real heat. I've seen some videos at Teen Fidelity, Rocco Siffredi or other sites that had real heat. That I thought were arousing.
Lesbian X is a different approach where the performers are acting more naturally. However, when I say they are acting more naturally, what I mean is that these models are role-playing for cash, there's little or no real passion. In spite of the moans and groans and squirting.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
The site doesn't impress me much.
Although the models are clean and attractive, the models at other sites can be more attractive.
The update rate is slow and irregular: There have been 9 new videos in the last 12 months.
The content is exclusive.
Navigation is easy.
But there's little that's exciting to watch at this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the X Empire network.
You get access to 5 sites with your membership.
All Black X, Dark X, Erotica X, Hard X, Lesbian X.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You can choose your login details, so easily remembered username and password.
-The site and network is easy to navigate.
-The extra-large thumbnails illustrating the videos at the site are clear and crisp, giving you a fine idea of what the model and the stunt cock look like.
-The large thumbnails are actually gifs: hold your mouse over a thumbnail, and you get a very brief action-view of the model, watch her breasts flop around, her ass jiggle as she gets pounded by a black cock. The downside is I'm into young teens with slender bodies, and the models here are mainly 20-30 year old models with normal-sized bodies that look more like porn stars instead of attractive young girls. Fans of the site call the models beautiful, but this is not my idea of beauty.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Even models that I think are pretty are presented as sluts at this site.
-Note: I am referring to the models at the Dark X site. The models at the other network sites are presented as attractive young women.
-All content is exclusive.
-Live chat is fast to respond, less than 2 minutes wait time.
-All videos stream and download from 288p through 1080p. The newest videos have a 4K option.
CONS(START OF):
-Sometimes have to pass through an ad-filled page to get to the members area.
-Every members page has ads, but ads are easily ignored.
-I'm being picky, but I think the prices for the sites in the ads are too high.
-The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 300GB. Which seems like a minor con to me. Who downloads 300GB in a day?
-The major con for me is I don't appreciate the style or approach of the videos. I enjoy the videos at the Wow network, Teen Mega World, X-Art.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
But at this site, the idea is you're looking at young women who want to fuck with a Black man, because it's somehow forbidden (even though it's perfectly legal today for whites and blacks to have sex). Sucking a black dick. Having a black cock up a white girl's ass. I don't buy this fantasy.
-Irregular update rate. Anywhere from 1 to 5 new videos per month.
-You can easily request a copy of your live chat. Except I did request a copy, the site stated a chat copy was sent to my email address, and I never got it (I checked inbox and spam box and never got a copy).
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Site has 244 videos.
-Video runtime is 20 to 40 minutes.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in the following definitions: 360p through 4K.
Note: I joined for $5 for 30 days, so I didn't have downloading privileges.
Even when my membership renewed at $19.95/month, I didn't have download privileges. That would cost about $10/month more.
I do have unlimited streaming.
-Site features inter-racial porn, where black men fuck white women.
I'm over 70, so I can recall where, mainly in the Southern United States, racial segregation was practiced: separate drinking fountains for white and black, blacks not allowed to use white-only restrooms, or to eat inside white-only restaurants.
I grew up in California, in Los Angeles county, so segregation was not so obviously practiced. But I remember we only had 1 black kid in our high school. No laws preventing him from using any facility a white person would use, but you might argue that 1 black kid in a public school population of around 300 was practical segregation.
Black men having sex with white women is a popular niche. I guess it's based on the old taboo prohibiting black men from having sex with white women.
So it can be shocking or add an element of lust for interracial sex.
(I don't know why we don't have lots of sites where white men fuck Asian women, since there was a lot of racial discrimination against Asians.)
I was roommates with a Chinese guy in the 1970s.
I was roommates with a Black guy in the 1970s.
Both of them had sex with white women.
It was nothing explosive or scandalous.
It was just normal sex.
So I don't buy into the fantasy that a white woman having sex with a black man is evil. Blacked.com and blackedraw.com are more my style, because they take attractive young women, make them even more attractive, and pair them with one or more black guys. But the tone is very different from the Dark X site.
Porn is fantasy. A lot of times, you need to shut down your brain to enjoy the show.
Except that I want good-looking teens, not porn stars looking like sluts.
I have nothing against black stunt cocks. But it just seems stupid to me that a white woman touching a black man's cock is ready to explode with lust.
Which is the fantasy that the Dark X site is promoting.
I'm giving the Dark X site a score of 78.
Blacked has the following advantages over Dark X:
The production values are much higher.
The models are presented much more attractively.
The update rate is much faster.
Blacked is a high-class act. Dark X falls short.
I would definitely choose Blacked over Dark X.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-MyFamilyPies is part of the Nubiles Porn network. The Nubiles Porn network is a fine network, where, in the main, the videos are crisp and clear, and well lighted. What a change from the Bang My Teen Ass site, the last site I reviewed, where the videos were washed out and the naturally attractive teen models were blah. At My Family Pies, you get crisp images of how lovely some of these models are.
Chloe Cherry, Haley Reed, Katie Kush, Kyler Quinn,Lady D, Stacy Cruz, Tiffany Tatum, and Zazie are just some of the cute models featured at the site.
-Video definition runs from 270p through 1080p for most videos.
They started offering 4K video definition for new videos at the site in October 2020, so the 4K option is definitely in the minority.
-PU has a special discount:
monthly: $14.98
yearly: $99.95
Sometimes you can find a yearly membership at $84.
-Content is exclusive.
-Navigation is easy.
-Excellent search engine.
-121+ photos per photoset.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
You also get a photoset of the same scene with screencaps. The sceencap photosets have a condensed number of screencaps, maybe 43. The idea of the screencap photoset is to save storage space, I guess. I think the photo photosets, if the model is really cute, are the better choice to collect. The images of the photos versus the screencaps are much crisper and better focused.
-They don't have a trailer for the videos, but the tags show you what the action will be in the video. Or you can play a slideshow of the photoset as a preview.
-There is a model listing for each site that can be arranged alphabetically, by posting date, or by rating. The model listing is nice-sized thumbnails that give you a good idea of what the model looks like.
CONS(START OF):
-The major con is how thin and stupid the plots are. And the acting is amateur.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-If you can ignore the stupid plots and lame acting (which is hard to do), many of the models are attractive young teens, and the sex can be OK.
-The models and stunt cocks speak English in the videos, but with an accent. I assume they are from Eastern Europe originally. I would prefer subtitles instead. I know many people don't like reading subtitles when watching a movie or video, but I don't mind. But the strange accents are irritating for me. (Maybe I need to start taking tranquilizers when I watch my porn?)
-Irregular update rate. You might get 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5 new videos in a month.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site theme: In today's world, divorce is common. So when divorced people remarry, they often make a blended family, with children from each parent.
This site shows that the blended step-children can have sex with each other (which I call fake incest, since the videos make clear there is no real incest by blood relations), and the step-children can also have sex with their step-parents.
So the taboo factor is supposed to make the sex hotter.
Fake incest, also some young-old sex when the step parents have sex with the step children.
I much prefer the Pure Taboo site (part of the Adult Time network) for the story-driven plots of taboos, which has cinematic quality videos, and excellent acting by the models).
Pure Taboo is a much finer site, but the MyFamilyPies does feature some cute models, and if you can ignore or accept the stupid plots and poor acting, the sex can be watchable. Or the sex can be boring.
What I like about the site is the sets are nice, the lighting is excellent, some of the models are cute. The site is well organized, is easy to navigate, and there are plenty of technical features to stream or download the videos and photosets.
But the stupid plots and the poor acting ruin the videos.
Maybe you could ignore the videos, which should be the main draw of the site, and slideshow the photosets. This would erase the stupid dialog, the stupid plot, the poor acting. And you could create your own plot to explain the slideshow. Except it would take a genius to create an intelligent plot for the slideshow. Because the female models and the stunt cocks usually act like morons, and the slideshows (even without dialogue) show this clearly.
I know I'm being harsh. I just can't get past the stupid plots and poor acting.
I suspect the models are trying for a comedic effect, because the plots make very little sense, but I would prefer the Teen Mega World style, or the Wow Porn style, of straight sex, with a little plot thrown in, but good hardcore sex. And the stupid plots at MyFamilyPies get in the way of any enjoyment of the sex.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 18videoz network. You get access to 18 sites.
-You have network access to over 3,000 videos. That is a large amount of hardcore videos.
-Starting Feb 17, 2017, the site and network gives expired members free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help.
-Starting Nov 28, 2016, the network offered 4K video quality for their latest movies.
-Many of the videos and photosets are exclusive. There are videos that have been sold to competing sites. So it depends on your porn experience whether you will come across videos you've seen before.
-Updated the video player (for streaming videos) on May 30, 2016.
-Vendo is the default biller. A trusted name. I've used Vendo many times over the years and never had a problem.
-All Bang My Teen Ass videos offer definitions of 272p through 1080p.
Cons:
-Even with a PU discount, the membership fee is very high. However, I found a holiday special of $59.95/year to join 18Videoz.com directly.
Normal PU discount is:
Monthly: $29.95
Multi-Mo: $39.95 (2 months, recurs $19.95/mo.)
Multi-Mo: $49.95 (3 months, non-recurring)
-Archive site. Last update was Feb 2, 2015.
-Small site. 96 videos.
-Some of the videos can be seen at other porn sites, such as Teen Mega World.
-I wish the videos had brighter lighting, better clarity. For a 1080p video, it's slightly disappointing. I much prefer the videos at Teen Mega World, which seem more vibrant. And the videos at the Wow Porn sites are better still.
-Login is not secure. Member pages are not secure.
--Every so often, you have to re-set your password. I'm not sure if this is because it's a security measure, or if your password has been hacked.
-Ads on member pages. You click on the thumbnail of a pretty girl, and a different site pops up to join that new site.
Site theme:
Teens getting fucked in the ass.
Although the site name implies the site concentrates on anal sex, in my opinion, the site name is just a generic name that tries to attract anal lovers, but doesn't really live up to the promise.
Yes, there is some anal sex. But it's just a small part of the action. The site is small, and the action is standard porn with some breast licking and sucking, cunnilinges, blowjob, vaginal sex, and anal sex thrown in.
I don't think anal lovers will be impressed by the site: If you want glamcore anal sex, I think Tushy would be a better choice. Because Tushy is not only glamcore, but it definitely concentrates on anal sex.
I said the models are not impressive. Actually, the site features many of the same Eastern European models you have seen at TMW and the Wow sites and other porn sites. So the models can be cute, but they are not presented attractively. You have teen girls that, at competing sites, might be cute to extremely attractive, but at this site they just seem blah.
I'm talking Olivia Grace, Taissia Shanti, Foxy Di, Margarita C, Anika A and others who not only appear at TMW, Wow sites, but even MetArt and other fine photo sites. But the Wow sites make the models so much more attractive in their scenes, and even the TMW sites do a better job presenting these models. These models are fucking attractive, but their scenes at Bang My Teen Ass are disappointing. The girls don't come across as super-attractive, and the scenes lack heat.
I'm giving the site a score of 78.
First, it's an archive site: last update was Feb 2, 2015.
It's a small site, with 96 videos.
The videos are meh. Boring, in spite of how cute the models can be at sites that present the models more attractively, in scenes with better heat or passion.
Navigation is easy, because it's a small site, and you get access to the 18videoz network, which has 18 sites to browse.
So there is plenty of hardcore videos at the network to browse, but this site lacks heat or visual appeal.
Am I spoiled by my long association with porn?
The site has many porn starlets that are just more attractive and show better heat at other sites, and that's why it doesn't deserve a higher score.
You're watching a scene in 1080p, and it seems like the colors are washed out and faded. I don't know if it's because the scenes are from years ago, or if they were shot on poor equipment.
But these girls deserve to be presented more attractively, with crisper images, with better heat.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Currently a special discounted price of $60 for the first year. Renews at $29.95/month.
So be sure to cancel before your membership renews.
Note: Be sure to join through the Full Porn Network site, which has the $60 for the first year discount. If you join through the James Deen site, or one of the other sites in the network, you will pay much higher prices, even with a PU discount.
-Part of the Full Porn Network. You get access to 18 different sites. The James Deen site is probably the most famous site in the network.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You get a new video every 3 or 4 days.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. Don't have to enter your login details. Just go to the site, and you are automatically logged in.
-Login details are simple: your username is your email address. You can choose your password.
-I'm not gay. But if I were gay, just looking at the colorful thumbnail of James Deen, with his wide-open smile, his (CONTINUED)
Cons:
bright blue eyes, his incredibly handsome face, and his slender body, would make me cream my pants. And his two-thumbs up gesture, showing how much he appreciates life, would be enough to give me a double orgasm.
-The model listing has nice, oversized thumbnails of the models and stunt cocks. The only problem is there are so many ads on each page, that there is only room for 16 thumbnails per page, so you have to click through 56 pages to see all the models and stunt cocks at the James Deen site. That's a lot of clicking.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Site and network have plenty of ads. You get a page of ads when you first log in, before you get to the member's area. Then you have ads on every page in the member's area.
-Because each page has so many ads (ads for sites included in the Full Porn Network and ads for other competing sites), there is very little room for thumbnails showing you the content from the James Deen site. (CONTINUED)
Bottom Line:
You have to click through a lot of pages to find the videos that belong to the James Deen site.
I don't think I've ever seen a site with so many ads per page.
-The thumbnails of the models (and stunt cocks) are not flattering to the models. Some of these models are attractive women at other sites, but not here. The site treats the models like meat, and makes no effort to portray them attractively.
-The selection of models is porn star lite. Most of the models look like trailer trash, except that people living in trailers probably look cleaner and more attractive than the trailer-trash models at the James Deen site. I like my models to be young and pretty, and the model selection is a real turnoff for me.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The Full Porn Network covers the following niches:
anal, fetish, trans, bdsm, rough sex, hardcore, role play, high definition, 4k UHD, romance, reality, teens, milf.
James Deen, the star of the site, has an amazing story.
He started in porn in 2004 when he was 18.
All he wanted to do was to have some fun. To meet some girls.
By 2012-02-02 he had starred in over 4,000 porn videos, and was the youngest person to win the porn "Male Performer of the Year" award.
What's so astounding is that, in spite of the massive female fanbase who adore him, he's just an "aw-shucks, regular guy", with curly brown hair and bright blue eyes who doesn't understand why he's so famous and lovable.
"I have no idea," Deen said. "I really, really have no clue."
I think of James Deen, growing up in a log cabin in Pasadena, an upscale community in Los Angeles County.
He claims that he first became interested in porn when he was in kindergarten and found an old porn magazine.
"I picked it up and I'm like, 'Oh my God, this is the cool, this is awesome,'" he said. "It was this weird moment that I will always remember where I was like, this is what I want to be when I grow up. I want to do this."
This story reminds me of Abraham Lincoln, who also grew up poor in the backwoods of Kentucky, and yet he rose to become the 16th president of the United States.
Deen is a humble man, just as Lincoln was.
"I don't market myself at all, I really don't," Deen said. "I just kind of be me."
And yet, they are both recognized as great men in their professions.
Imagine, if you will, if Deen, instead of reading an old porn magazine when he was five years old, had, instead, read a copy of the US Constitution, that he might have become the son to President Donald Trump, and carried on his adopted father's political career. Deen might have even married Ivanka Trump, and founded his own political dynasty.
Deen has the humbleness, the greatness, to make America great again.
That is why I watch Deen's porn videos with bated breath: Deen is a younger version of Donald Trump. And with every thrust of his vibrant cock into the willing pussy or ass of his sex partners, he proves that women love to be abused and treated roughly.
In 2015, several women, including his ex-girlfriend Stoya, said they were sexually abused by Deen. Stoya claimed that Deen raped her, and ignored her using the safe word telling him to stop.
Deen denied all these allegations as defamatory. He says he respects women and their civil liberties.
Deen, like Donald Trump, is a champion of women's rights.
Although these attacks by women in 2015 might have destroyed Deen's porn career, he was able to deny all accusations of illegal conduct and claim he was baffled by the accusations.
Basically, James Deen is an American porn superstar who loves women and treats them with the respect they deserve.
Bottom line summary:
What do you get at the James Deen site?
Rough sex, where unattractive models are fucked up the pussy and ass, slapped and spit on, arms twisted behind their backs to make them moan in pain. Treating women like they should be treated, because men are the dominant creatures who enjoy abusing these cunts. James Deen is the master of bringing his artistic vision of women to the screen: And the women love him for it, as they moan and groan and gag on the thick cocks jammed down their throats.
There is a disclaimer at the start of each video that states:
"The performance you are about to watch is meant for entertainment purposed only. It should not be seen as a model for real-life sexual encounters. We recommend honest, clear, and ongoing communication with your partner(s) before any sexual encounter. All actors in this film are consenting adults who follow specific adult industry regulations. Please have fun, respect each other, and practice safer sex."
The notice is legal boilerplate, that is meant to protect the site. It's a common joke that many models have been abused on site, with no attention paid to the boilerplate claims. The models in the videos are called sluts, whores, bitches. Because this is gonzo porn, and the models have to be treated with the respect they deserve.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the LetsDoeIt network. Network has 17 channels (down from over 40 channels previously). All channels are open, there are no premium channels you have to pay extra for.
-The network features hardcore porn. The selection of models range from attractive to fucking gorgeous. The White Boxxx is the crown jewel of the network, because the channel features gorgeous models presented in a glamcore setting that showcases the models in erotic videos.
-You can choose to use a credit card or paypal to join.
-Vendo is the billing agent. Vendo site is easy to use, easy to cancel.
-You choose your password, instead of computer-generated.
-Join, login, and member pages are https.
-Navigation is easy. Easy to switch between channels.
-PU lists a discounted price of $9.95/month (recurring). PU also lists$99.95/year. But when I hit the link to LetsDoeIt, it showed a price of $79.95/year, and I joined at that price.
-The content is exclusive.
Cons:
-2 pre-checked cross-sales on join page.
-Slow download speeds. I average 1 Mbps on my WIFI network. When I do an internet speed test, I get anywhere from 15-90 Mbps. So I get very slow download speeds for video files. It's not a problem with the photo sets, because the photo set files are so small (only 6 photos per photo set).
My internet connection is supposed to 200 Mbps from Spectrum. That is the hard-wired speed, not the WIFI speed (WIFI is always slower than a hardwired connection).
-I get a lot of failed video downloads from the site. Don't know what is causing the problem. Not only are the download speeds slow, but they often fail, which reduces the download limit you're allowed, because a failed download is counted the same as a successful download.
-Quest For Orgasm is an archive site. Last video was added 2017-09-04. That's a shame because they have some really lovely models.
-The channel only has 80 videos.
-There is a download limit of 100 videos/month for the network.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
The network has a lot of beautiful models. Not all videos will appeal to every PU member, but there are a lot of videos that are worth saving.
-Each video has an accompanying photo set, but the photo sets are tiny.
The photo sets I downloaded only had 6 photos per set.
Some of these models are lovely to gorgeous. They deserve a larger photo set.
-The photo sets only download in one definition. No choice of high, medium or low.
-The name of each photo set appears to be computer generated. Example file names are 5e00e2d6d6379 and 5e00e2d6d6379. So you have to manually re-name the file to show the site, model, video title, date posted.
-There is very little personal details about the model listed. Name of model, country of origin, a brief description her body(which can be misleading or wrong).
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site features lovely models masturbating to orgasm.
There isn't much variety in the sex action.
You have a solo girl, and she's masturbating.
Usually with a sex toy (a small or large vibrator, but also fingers or a dildo).
The main attraction is how lovely some of these girls are.
The videos run from 20 to 30 minutes.
They usually start off with a brief interview of the model, who states where she lives, some activities she likes to do, hobbies, etc.
The girls are presented as girl-next-door types, not porn stars.
Just girls who have a normal, healthy appetite for sex.
Which they are satisfying with masturbation. Since there are no boy-girl or girl-girl scenes at this channel.
Some of the interviews can be interesting.
The interview can be 10 minutes or less.
The models speak freely.
They seem to be giving their real thoughts, what's it's like to be a porn model, having sex as a job. So you get a connection to the girls, which makes it more real than just watching a porn video.
These are European models, who come from Russia, Czech, Serbia, Spain, etc.
So if you have a partner, you can always claim that you joined the site because you wanted to learn more about people from Europe.
This network is very educational, because I look up the countries to see where the beautiful girls are coming from. And with the way countries are splitting and new ones are emerging, I need wikipedia to show me what's what.
Jessica Spielberg is labelled as "slim, small natural tits." She is a lovely model. But I would describe her as normal build, not slim. And her breasts are medium-sized, not small.
She has one video at Quest For Orgasm, another video at Bitches Abroad.
She is presented as a lovely, adorable girl at Quest For Orgasm.
Just fucking lovely.
I may be crazy, but she's so innnocent-looking in her Quest for Orgasm video, where she reaches several orgasms masturbating.
In the Bitches Abroad video, she comes across a little differently.
She's a tourist looking at a map of Prahal (Czech for Prague), and she asks a guy for directions.
The guy is Kristof Cale, who offers to help find her destination, but first he takes her to his apartment; he tells her he has to change his clothes before he will show her where to go.
At his apartment, she starts to eat a pastry he gives her, and he starts to get undressed in front of her. She walks forward to look at his exposed cock, and she offers him a bite of the pastry he gives her, they start kissing, he takes the pastry away and throws it on the floor, and BOOM! It's time for sex.
Maybe I'm missing the point. Is this a European thing, where you skip the preliminaries, and go for hard-and-fast fucking?
Or maybe this is the European version of seduction.
I definitely need a European vacation, where I can find a model like Jessica Spielberg.
I'm giving the channel a score of 78.
The slow download speeds are irritating.
The failed downloads are irritating.
The tiny number of photos in a photo set (6 photos per set) is poor. Some of these models are lovely, and deserve larger photo sets.
This is an archive site. Stopped updating in September 2017.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-197 videos. Not huge, but still good sized for a hardcore teen site.
-They updated the online video player in 2016.
-Expired members get free limited access to the website. You can see all picture sets, some videos, and a preview of the latest updates.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not the biggest name in payment processors, but I've used them many times, and never had a problem.
-The models are late teens or early 20s. Not super attractive, but not ugly.
-PU gives a discount of $14.95 for the first month.
-PU also gives a discounted yearly membership of $59.95/recurring.
-Membership in 18Flesh gives you access to over 9 main hardcore teen sites.
-More recent videos are up to 4K definition for other sites in the network.
-Althogh 18 Flesh is not updating, the network is updating, so there is fresh material to enjoy.
-After you've logged in to the site/network a few times, the site will normally recognize you, so you don't need to re-enter your login details each time.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can vote on each video, up or down. Considering the last video was posted over 8 years ago, there are very few votes on most videos, and the number of downloads of most videos is often less than 1,000, which means very few people have bothered to collect these videos.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-This is an archive site. The last update was on 2011-12-15.
-Non-secure login. Meaning your login details are easily hacked.
-Non-secure member pages. Meaning the pages you visit are recorded by your ISP and available to spy agencies and the police as needed.
-The username and password are computer generated, so you need to write them down.
-The video definition is low: you have a choice of 240p or 480p. Most PU members would require a far higher definition, if possible.
Bottom Line:
Site Videos 197
Site Models 2241
Site Photosets 2439
The Best Porn states the 18 Videoz network had 3,027 video on 2018-06-27.
On 2020-03-12, the number of videos is 3198.
171 videos added in 20 months indicates a slow update rate to the network.
The 18 Flesh site itself stopped updating on 2011-12-15.
You get 2 additional bonus sites with a membership (the 1-day trial membership do not get access).
The sites are Teens Analyzed and 18 Pussy Club.
The also have a live sex cams channel, with over 2,300 models.
Many of the models are men, so I assume that is for gay audiences.
(Man, not interacting with a woman.)
I'm not interested in cam shows, so I didn't investigate the cam shows, even though there are both "online", "party", and "gold" shows available.
The cam shows can be viewed in English, French, Spanish, Italian, German, Swedish, Portuguese, Dutch, Norwegian.
You can also select the chat show by geographic region:
North America/UK/Australia
Western Europe
Central Eastern Europe
Central/South America
Asia
Africa
The live cams also have a calendar, where they list the time and date of special chat events: WildOnCam, Squirtamania, ErotiqueTV.
The calendar only lists 3 or 4 days of upcoming days' events.
Although I believe the videos at 18 Flesh are professionally shot, with good lighting, framing, color and sound control, and ok-looking models, the videos are just hardcore sex with little eroticism or flavor. I quickly found them boring.
I enjoy the videos at Teen Mega World much better: I think the models are more attractive, and the girls put on a better show.
And the videos at Wow Girls and Wow Porn are at a higher level, because of how fucking attractive the models can be: and the technical factors (lighting, color, sound, framing) are excellent.
I'm giving 18 Flesh a score of 76.
Because in addition to 18 Flesh, you get access to a number of other sites in the network.
And if you are into cams, the cam shows might be interesting.
Except I can't evaluate the cam shows, because I have no interest in them.
What I do find interesting about the cam shows is that there is apparently a large number of shows for gay clients.
If you don't require girls that are very attractive, that put on a good show of enjoying a sexual experience, if you only require a guy plugging a girl's mouth, pussy and ass, then you could score the site higher. I want to watch attractive girls, and I hope that they will put on a show that convinces me they are enjoying themselves, so I'm willing to pay more for an upgraded experience.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Dirty Flix network of around 12 sites. Join any site, you get access to all the network. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-No pre-checked cross-sale on the join page. But check to be sure, because it's very unusual for a join page not to have at least one pre-checked cross-sale.
-On videos, they give you both mp4 and wmv file formats. The newer videos have mp4 definition for mobile devices, on up to 4K.
-Navigation is basic but adequate.
-You have tags and category labels to describe the videos, but no plot summary. Except there's not much plot. You have a guy, a girl, and they have sex.
Cons:
-The default for the login page and the member pages are not secure. But if you put "https" (without the quotation marks) in front of the login page, or if you go directly to the member page and put that "https" in the address bar, your login and the member pages will be secure.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is sub-par for a hardcore porn site. At least, the porn sites that I subscribe to.
-Regular price is expensive: $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find holiday specials for $60/year. The holiday specials are for the dirty flix network, which includes the Fucking Glasses site. Normally, if you want to save money, search for a discount to the network, not an individual site in the network. It's much easier finding discounts to the network name, instead of a discount to one of the network sites.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-One problem with porn sites are the names. You join enough sites, all the names start to seem the same. I'm a member of Dirty Flix. Also a member of Filth Flix, which are competing sites.
The same people who run (or own?) Dirty Flix also run 18 Videoz, and both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz share some of the same video content. Both Dirty Flix and 18 Videoz focus on hardcore teen porn.
-Videos have an accompanying photoset, that you can download. But almost all the photosets are made of screencaps, so the quality of the photosets is poor, and they aren't worth collecting.
-The sound track for the video goes in and out. So it doesn't match what the actors are saying. Not a big deal, since the dialog is basically bullshit, but it just adds to the cheap impression of the video.
-Ads for other sites on every member page. Standard for porn sites. But since a lot of the site videos seem boring, you click on the ads of attractive models for other sites, but don't join, since the ads don't offer attractive discounts.
-The site has 123 movies. So it's a small site.
-The update rate is very irregular.
The most recent video was posted Feb 28, 2020.
Before that, you would get 2 or 3 videos in a year.
-The camera focus is often poor. They need a better camera operator to film these videos.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is a guy who has a camera concealed in his glasses is secretly filming his pickups. So this is supposed to be voyeur sex. Which gives you chills when you realize the girls getting fucked are unaware they are being filmed (Sarcasm. You're supposed to enjoy the video more because the girl supposedly doesn't know the encounter is being filmed.).
I'm giving the site a score of 75.
The cons outweigh the pros.
A small site. Last update was Feb 2020. Before that, you would get 2 or 3 new videos per year.
The models are not very attractive. Even when you have an attractive girl, she isn't presented to her best advantage. The way you photograph or video a model can make a tremendous difference in how appealing she appears. And the models at this site just don't appeal to me.
The network is called dirty flix, and that's what the site videos are: cheap sex videos.
I mean, there are some models at the site that are physically very attractive: Alaina Dawson, Inga Zolva, etc. But the videos don't use that physical beauty to make clear, crisp videos with good lighting, good sound control, nice sets, good camera work.
The videos are just low-grade videos. And the photosets are cheap screen cap collections.
So what's the value of the site?
Look at a few videos, and decide if it's worth your time to watch these videos.
I don't think it's worth my time.
I'd rather watch better videos.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Adult Prime network. A fine, teen-oriented network.
-They change the home page of the Adult Prime member page fairly often, so you get a current picture of the updates and live shows and whatever else is happening at the network.
-Login is easy if you have cookies enabled. There is a captcha, but it's very easy to read.
-Videos are offered in 540p, 720p, 1080p. No 4K option.
-You get a photoset for most videos.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-The content is exclusive.
Cons:
-Tiny site. Only 46 videos. 32 photosets.
-They were updating with 2 or 3 new videos per month.
But the last updates were in November 2021. So this might be an archive site.
-Videos filmed in Australia. The Aussie accents are intriguing at first, but I would prefer American English, so I could understand the dialog easier.
-The females can have under-arm hair.
The females can have pubic hair.
Hair doesn't bother me. But it's different from the shaven look of most porn models.
Bottom Line:
The videos are a change of pace from the normal videos shown at many porn sites.
The videos are seem more amateurish.
The colors of the videos are nowhere near as life-life as the videos at the Diesel network, or the Club Sweethearts or Digital Desire sites.
The idea of the site is supposed to be Aussie girls having kinky fun.
But that's a stretch.
Maybe I'm too jaded, but to me, watching these videos is like watching home made videos of regular-looking people with a bit of sex thrown in. The sex is not kinky.
In one video, you watch 3 young women in a cabin near some woods, they go out and hang up some laundry, they take off their clothes, they talk, kiss, touch each other, lick each other's pussies.
This is the Southern Sins site version of sin: minimal lesbian sex between 3 women.
Give me the videos at the Wow sites, which seem like masterpieces of artistic vision in comparison: Not only are the girls at the Wow sites absolutely gorgeous compared to the models at Southern Sins, but the videos at the Wow sites have vivid colors for the flesh tones of the models, the clarity and crispness of the images at the Wow sites is far superior.
It's just a completely different type of offering.
Southern Sins is offering you home-style porn: the men and women in their videos are plain-style people. The quality of the videos is what you would get filming your own family at your house or at a park or on the street with amateur cameras (minus the sex, obviously).
The site is worth checking out since it's included in the Adult Prime network.
Think of the site as a slice of life site: you are watching home-style, amateur videos (and photosets) of mild sex. The sin is in the idea of sex. If you see two people kissing, that is sinful. Especially if they are both women. And if they have plastic ties or handcuffs on the women, Oh, God, that is perverted sex. No matter how mild the sex might be. Or, my gosh, what if a man and woman have sex on a blind date: how perverted and sinful.
I'm giving the site a score of 75.
I really enjoy American porn more. Or European porn. That has a more glossy feel, better scripts, more attractive models. Southern Sins gives you home-made, simple porn that is very bland.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site theme is models with lots of tats and piercings.
-Recent videos have your choice of definition of 160p through 2160p for download.
-The streaming option is 288p through 2160p.
-There is a daily download limit of 300 GB for videos. Which is huge. That would allow you to download about 90 4K videos per day, or 353 720p videos per day. So I don't consider that a con at all.
-Customer support is excellent. There is 24/7 for email, telephone, and live chat. I suggest using live chat, since that's the fastest way to get a response.
-They use some recognizable stunt cocks, like Steve Holmes and Markus Dupree, as well as models like AVN hall of famer Joanna Angel. So the channel uses big name talent in this niche, which I think of as extreme hardcore goth. Not my cup of tea, since I like cute teens with minimal tats and piercing.
But it's a matter of taste. If goth sluts are your fetish, you could find plenty of content to your liking.
Cons:
-The main con is the navigation. Adult Time and it's channels are difficult to navigate. You can't easily get a listing of all the videos at a channel. Or all the models at a channel.
-Memberships need to be understood before you join. The monthly membership is usually streaming only. The simplest way to get downloading privileges is to get an annual membership, but most PU members only want to join for 1 month. There is a monthly membership that gives downloading privileges, but it's hidden, and not usually visible. I suggest using live chat, to see if customer support will offer you a discounted monthly rate that includes downloading privileges. I know at least one PU member who got a monthly Adult Time membership with downloading privileges for the same price as a monthly streaming only membership.
-The acting is terrible. The plots are unbelievable.
-No model bios.
Bottom Line:
Adult Time advertises itself as the only (porn) subscription you need.
I personally think that's over-hype.
There are plenty of other porn sites worth joining.
But for fans of hardcore sex, there's no denying that Adult Time gives you plenty of bang for your buck.
You get over 250 channels, 55,000 episodes and 8 releases per day.
That covers a wide variety of niches. And most of the content is high quality: no schlocky goods on sale that I can find.
With so many niches covered, there should be plenty of hardcore action to fill your hardcore needs.
Not everyone at the PU site is thrilled with the Adult Time network.
But I personally think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today (and that is true for the last few years).
Burning Angel used to be a separate site. But it was folded into the Adult Time network a few years ago.
I don't believe it still exists as a separate site: it only exists as a channel in the Adult Time network. Does this make a difference in your membership to Burning Angel?
Yes.
As a channel in Adult Time, navigation in Burning Angel gives you what I consider the Fucked-Up Click Navigation System. Years ago, as a separate site, it was much easier to navigate through the Burning Angel content. In today's world, as part of Adult Time, you need nimble fingers to go Click-Click-Click to find what the hell the content is at Burning Angel. I've been a member of Adult Time for about 3 years now (I know, most PU members only join for 1 month at a time), but I think some of the channels are excellent, especially Pure Taboo, and there's plenty of content for me to find. I just wish the navigation was easier, so I could find the content that I like.
What is the site theme of Burning Angel?
Hardcore sex.
With models that are heavily tattooed and heavily pierced.
The sex is a mixture of boy-girl, 2-guys-1-girl, 2-guys-2-girls, girl-girl, blowjob, vaginal, anal, BDSM, cum drinking and swallowing.
The plots are simplistic, the acting is kindergarden-level.
To watch these videos, turn off your brain, or get really drunk, or snort a couple ounces of cocaine.
Note: some of these videos show the actors drinking cocaine. I've heard of snorting cocaine, smoking cocaine, injecting cocaine, but drinking coke is a new one on me.
I guess you have to watch Burning Angel to learn the uses of cocaine.
Don't use cocaine without the supervision of your medical doctor.
Coke can be dangerous to your health.
Anyway, the plots and acting of the models are at the kindergarden level.
The fake moans and groans of excitement are patently fake.
-Note: Many of these videos have been nominated and have won AVN awards.
AVN is the adult video industry trade magazine. Burning Angel videos have won best action thriller, best sex comedy scene, best actor, best director, etc. So even though I think these videos are trash, experts in porn think they are among the best videos in porn. I think these videos are shit. But porn professionals think many of these videos are pure gold.
You need to watch a few of these videos, to see if they fit your tastes.
I'm giving Burning Angel a score of 75. That's very subjective.
Main negatives are:
The navigation is terrible.
The plots are stupid.
The acting is terrible.
The main benefit of the channel is it makes you realize how wonderful some of the other channels really are.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 18 different sites with a membership in any one of the Nubiles Porn sites.
-Login and member pages are secure. Https.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads
-Site (and network) is easy to navigate and use.
-Excellent search engine.
-Exclusive content.
-PU has a discount price of $14.95/month (recurring).
-Videos are availble for streaming and downloading in definitions from 270p through 1080p.
Cons:
-Small site. Only 36 videos.
Very irregular updates. You get one video in a month, maybe the next video is one, two or nine months later. So even though the first posted video is Dec 20, 2015, the site is small and growing slowly.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-The female models are not attractive.
Bottom Line:
The site was launched in Dec 20, 2015.
36 videos.
Runtime is 25 to 30+ minutes.
The first 5 or 6 minutes is the models talking to each other. Which is supposed to be the setup. Then, suddenly, with almost no preparation, they're either stroking cocks, fondling breasts, or whatever else the script calls for, because these are horny models whose erotic lusts were just bubbling underneath their skins, and you couldn't see it until the sexual desire started to erupt.
The site theme is teachers fucking their students.
This is a common theme in porn.
The twist for this site is that many of the teachers are female. And they are having sex with their male and female students.
That twist is not enough to make this site exciting or memorable.
The female teachers are often MILFs, women in their 30s who look like aging porn stars.
Although the site describes the women as "stunners" or "oh so sexy", this is typical porn hype: the average teen or adult female you see at your local mall is more attractive. The Nubiles Porn network has a lot of attractive teen models, but the female models at this site are below average in looks.
The site tries to add a story to the scene: the teacher either is tutoring a student at the teacher's home or at the student's home. So the video spends about 6 minutes where the teacher is supposedly tutoring a student, then the female teacher pulls out the student's cock, or the female student pulls out the teacher's cock, and we're off to the races. The plots are stupid and unbelievable. There's no build-up to the sex: we're just watching porn models (who aren't actors) recite a few lines, before the female starts stroking the stunt guy's cock and having sex.
Contrast this with the Pure Taboo site, where the models have either been given some actor training, or they can naturally act, and the models create some tension and excitement before they have sex. Some of the Pure Taboo plots can be far out or unbelievable, but at least the Pure Taboo writers put some thought into the plots they write.
Teachers Fuck Teens plots are trite, stupid, and unbelievable. And it doesn't help that the female models are unattractive.
The Nubiles Porn network is a good network, but it has some clunky sites. Teachers Fuck Teens is one of the clunkers.
This is my personal opinion. Some members post comments for each of the videos, and the member comments are often favorable.
For example: "need more new movies of her.........lovely," or "she the best!" or "great scene."
Which goes to show you that what I consider sub-standard porn can be considered gold porn by others.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. The main positive about the site is that it gives you access to the Nubiles Porn network, which has some very fine sites.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-3,200+ videos for the network.
-The network is still updating.
-Free lifetime access for ex-members. After your membership expires, you can still see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in the member zone.
-You can save your favorite videos, models and photosets.
-Low annual membership price. I joined for $60/year.
-The network has at least 9 sites you get access to.
-Telephone live support is supposed to be 24/7. But I never used it, to try it out.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading (at least, I never found any limits. However, I don't download a lot, so, based on my personal history, I wouldn't usually encounter any download limits if there were any.).
-You can steam the videos in 240p, 720p, 1080p.
-You can download the videos in 240p, 720p, 1080p, 4K.
-The network updates with 3 to 5 new videos and matching photosets per week.
Cons:
-Login and member pages are not secure (no https).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-There is a live sex cams channel. I'm not interested in live sex cams. And when I click on the channel, I get a notice, in Spanish, that:
A problem has been detected with your account.
You can contact live support if you have questions.
(Why the notice is in Spanish I have no idea, since the rest of the network is in English.)
-Your login details are computer generated, instead of allowing you to choose your own.
-There is only 1 definition for the zip file for the photosets. But the photoset is mainly a screencap collection of the video. And hardly worth collecting.
Even when the models are cute, the photoset is not worth collecting.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: A variation of kinky sex.
From the site description:
"They must be total perverts to sit there and watch their GFs get fucked for cash
For some of these guys watching their girlfriends get banged by another man is a real turn-on while for others it's a painful pleasure
Watch these hot amateur chicks get their brains fucked out by horny strangers right before their boyfriends' eyes"
If you get off from watching a guy sell his girlfriend for some needed cash, and enjoy the guy's humiliation, or it turns you on as a voyeur to watch a girl having sex in front of her boyfriend, this site will scratch that itch.
The vibe of the site: this is a home-movie collection of videos. They are not trying to make glamcore porn, but home-based porn, where you get the stunt cocks in cheap clothes, the models in cheap street clothes, a low-rent apartment where the sex takes place. The guy is selling his girlfriend for needed cash, and he watches some other guy having sex with his girlfriend.
Not only is this home-based porn, but it's Russian home-based, low-rent porn, where the attitude is, "She my girlfriend, I'm making money off her pussy." So, not a lot of romance or glamour to the attitudes or settings or costumes or makeup to make the girls look attractive.
The girls are young teens, mainly naturally attractive, but the sex is like a bologna sandwich where you grab two slices of bread, maybe swipe a bit of mayonnaise with a kife, slap in one or two slices of bologna, and start chomping away.
This isn't even bread-and-butter porn.
It's more like two slices of bread, slapped together, and eaten.
No pickles, no mayonnaise, no mustard, no lettuce, maybe a slice of bologna, nothing else.
So if you're tired of the normal glamcore porn, and want to go back to the good-old-days of low-rent porn, this site and network can fill that need.
The only problem is that a lot of the teens are cute girls.
And they deserve better treatment, to make their videos and photosets more enjoyable.
If you want simple teen porn, with attractive teen models that are attractive yet presented simply without a lot of glamour, I recommend the Teen Mega World network, which has thousands of attractive teens, that are fucked in a variety of ways.
In spite of the low membership price of this site and network, I would recommend looking for other sites to join.
Note: I'm not a fan of the home-based porn style of shooting.
I've seen videos from this network at tube sites (like PornHub and others), where those videos were attractive. That's why I joined this network, because the videos I saw from this network were attractive. The same videos, at the network, are far less attractive. I assume that either the tube sites, or the network, upgraded the sample videos.
I just wish the network did the same upgrades on the videos at the network.
Then, I would recommend the site and network as worth joining.
Normally, you think that the quality of a video at the original network is higher quality than the version at a tube site.
Site stats:
Site videos: 269
Site updates with one new video and photoset per month.
The network updates with 3 to 5 videos and photosets per week.
Network stats:
Network videos: 3,236
Network photos: 212,691
Network models: 2,254
Photosets: Average 50 photos per set, for the site and the network.
The network started offering 4K videos in late 2016 for their newest videos.
In February 2017, the network gave free access to expired members.
From now on all expired members get free limited access to our website. You will be able to see all picture sets, some videos and a preview of all the latest updates in your member zone. If your password stopped working you can reset it on login page or ask our support for help.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. Even with network access and a low membership price, I would not recommend joining.
Which is a shame. Because the network has a lot of cute teen models.
However, maybe I'm being too hard.
In all of the videos I watched at the site, the boyfriend stayed to watch the guy fucking the girl.
Maybe he was checking to see if the buyer was getting his money's worth.
Maybe the guy doing the selling wanted to make sure his girlfriend was enjoying the sex.
Maybe the guy selling, and the guy buying, were true friends and the money was just a device where they could share the girl without telling the girl the two guys were really interested in each other, and the girl was just a beard used to hide the fact the two guys are gay?
Questions like this could raise the score by a few points.
A listing of the sites included in network access is included in the first reply to this review.
As well as a few notes on the listing.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-I want to thank PU member Wraith0711 for pointing out in a comment ThatSitComShow and HotCrazyMess are included as bonus sites in a membership with NubilesFilm.
The NubilesFilm site itself doesn't seem to advertise you get the bonus sites, so unless you are sharp-eyed or detail oriented like Wraith0711, you don't see all the content available to you with a membership.
-I joined Nubiles Films in September 2019 for a year-long membership. That's why I am saying I'm been a member of That Sitcom Show for 6-12 months. I'm not sure when they added That Sit Com Show as a bonus site.
-ThatSitcomShow (and Nubiles Films) is currently running a special discount of $84/year.
-You get a bunch of different content options: Video (streaming and downloading), Pics, Screenshots.
-Downloads are offered in 270p through 1080p.
-Streaming quality is 270p through 720p.
-Content is exclusive.
-Streaming and downloading are unlimited.
-Login and member pages are https.
Cons:
-That Sitcom Show's last update was 2019-09-20. So it's an archive site. And with the coronavirus epidemic, it will probably stay an archive site, as the virus shuts down porn production around the world for months or more.
-Small site. Only 44 videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The videos are boring. That's my personal reaction. Maybe other people will find them funny and worth watching, or sexy. Time and money and talent was spent making the the videos.
Bottom Line:
That Sitcom Show features the porn parodies of popular TV shows:
Two Men, Big Bang, Friends With Benefits, Threesome Company, Married With Issues, and a bunch of other TV shows are featured.
I don't watch a lot of regular TV, so I'm not familiar with most (or any) of the TV shows that are being parodied. I won't enjoy the parodies as much as someone who is a regular watcher of those shows. I won't catch the jokes as easily, the jokes will have less meaning for me.
I think the Nubile Films site (that is part of the package of Nubiles Film, That SitCom Show and Hot Crazy Mess) is the star of the 3 sites. Nubiles Films is an outstanding hardcore site, with outstanding models that range from attractive to lovely, and high level videos that are gorgeous to watch: well lit, beautifully filmed.
That SitCom Show is less appealing. It's porn parodies, not my favorite niche.
Since I'm unfamiliar with the TV shows being parodied, I can't appreciate the parodies as much as someone who is familiar with the original content of the TV shows.
I think they put a lot of thought and effort into making a quality product of the parodies.
There is a good audience laugh track for the show, the models (male and female) are actually actors, who do a much better job acting than most porn models. There is a real plot involved in the episodes. The female models are attractive.
One problem watching these parodies: my mind knows these are parodies. So I can't watch them as straight porn, I'm trying to find the humor in the video, since that is what a parody is supposed to be: an exaggerated version of something that has a humorous factor. So the humor gets in the way of reacting to a sex scene.
Do you remember the movie, "Fast Times at Ridgemont High"? The classic scene with Phoebe Cates coming out of the swimming pool in a red bikini. Phoebe Cates, lovely face, fantastic body, she unhooks the top of her bikini and shows her breasts. One of the most iconic sex scenes of the early 1980s. Not much sex, just a fantastic looking girl and brief flash of breasts. But that scene had it all. One of the most beautiful girls of all time, topless, humor and wit. Not a parody, but just a great fucking scene in a very good movie.
I can't appreciate the videos in That Sit Com Shows. I know they are good quality videos: the acting is far superior to the acting of most porn models. The video technical quality is good. The script is good.
I think the problem is that I'm want porn to be hot, arousing. And the scenes don't turn me on. The Phoebe Cates scene in Fast Times at Ridgemont High was shocking. I kept thinking what a fucking gorgeous girl Phoebe Cates is. And the humor and wit were just added bonuses. But the parodies at That Sit Com Shows don't excite my admiration or excitement. They are nicely done, far better than what I was expecting.
But so what? They are not what I'm looking for in porn.
I remember going to New York City in the 1970s and watching Candide on Broadway. Candide was based on a novel by Voltaire and was a satire on Leibniz's philosophy of optimism. The play was enjoyable and exciting. Not porn, but interesting.
The porn parodies are not especially interesting.
Not especially fun.
Maybe if I was a fan of the TV series the videos are based on, they might have more interest and be funnier for me.
But even though I think the porn videos are done very well, they are boring for me.
Bottom Line:
Pros:
They've put a lot of time and effort and talent into making good porn parodies of TV shows.
Login and member pages are https.
The models are surprisingly good actors. The scripts are good.
Cons:
The videos are boring for me.
The site is small. 44 videos.
The site's last update was 2019-09-20.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining any site in the small network gives you access to 5 sites.
The 5 sites are listed in the Bottom Line section of this review.
-Navigation is basically simple.
-There is a text file that describes the action of the video very well.
-Also, plenty of tags to describe the action of the video. So search is easy and can be very detailed, if you want it to.
-Newer videos have a definition of 320p through 4K. The 4K video file size is around 3.35 GB for a 23 minute runtime video, so the coding seems efficient.
-The content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-The level of attractiveness of the models is poor. Other PU members have written that they find the models to be attractive. I disagree completely. I respect the opinion of these PU members, but find it hard to agree with their opinion.
-I find the quality of the videos and photo sets to be poor. The images are not crystal clear, but either slightly unfocused or with a slight haze to the image. But since the models are not attractive to begin with, I wouldn't mind watching the video with the images in complete darkness, so I wouldn't have to view the models at all. (That is a joke, but also has an element of truth. These models are far below the attractive level of the Teen Mega World models, and comparing the models at Wet and Puffy to the models at the Wow sites is like comparing night and day: the Wow site models are fucking georgeous; the Wet and Puffy models are unappetizing.
-The online mechanism for viewing photo sets is clunky. Slow to load images.
-Pre-checked cross-sale.
Bottom Line:
The 5 sites of this network include:
Wet and Puffy We Like To Suck
Wet and Pissy
Simply Anal
Eurobabe Facials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Membership in any one site gives you access to all 5 sites.
The stats for Wet and Puffy network:
Over 27000 photos. and
Over 480 models.
They advertise that the photos are the best ultra high definition picture sets.
They advertise that the tags, filters and layout of each page makes browsing simple.
The thumbnails that illustrate the models have washed out colors.
Even models that appear young and attractive at competing sites look plain and unattractive at this site, in the photo sets and videos.
You examine a photo in a photo set, and it appears as if the photo was taken with a filter that makes the model appear slightly out of focus.
Each photo set has 2 definition zip files, low and high.
The low definition is 666 x 1000 pixels.
The high definition is 2267 x 3400 pixels.
In the photos, the models are uniformly unattractive. They are plain-looking women. You go to a local mall, you find plenty of good-looking teens or twenty-year-olds. The models at this site are mainly in their twenties or thirties, and they are far less attractive than the normal twenty-thirty-year-old you find at your local mall. One reason is the photos have washed-out colors, so the skin tones of the models are not pleasing. A second reason is the models themselves are below-average in level of physical looks. Plus many of the models have lots of tattoos, which I'm not a fan of.
Even though the site advertises "best ultra high definition picture sets", I look at sets and feel the quality is far below the quality of any photo site, in any technical feature you can think of: these photo sets are shit. Teen Mega World, which is a hardcore teen site, has photo sets that are far superior in technical quality to the photo sets at Wet and Puffy. The the quality of the teen models at Teen Mega World is far superior in attractiveness to the Wet and Puffy models.
The Wet and Puffy models are mainly plain to unattractive. The photos are not worth collecting. They aren't even worth viewing.
Note: some of the live cam girls are really attractive.
Note: my opinion seems to be in the minority.
There are some attractive models at this site, but they are not presented attractively at the site. Delphine and Nika O, two girls who normally look very attractive at other sites, look washed out (in color and skin tones) and blah at this site. How a girl is photographed can make a huge difference in her appearance. Besides which, most of the models at this site are not that attractive to begin with.
Maybe I should have my eyes checked. I look for attractive girls at this site and can't find any. Some of the girls are attractive at other sites, but not at this site. I know that beauty is supposed to be in the eye of the beholder. The average female at any local mall, or even your local grocery store or Walmart, is far more attractive than the models at Wet and Puffy.
Maybe my problem is expectations: I assume that most models are chosen for their looks. But at this site, I think they were chosen for performing hardcore sex. Without bothering to filter for attractiveness.
The photo play mechanism for viewing photos online is clunky. Images are slow to load. The images themselves are poor in color, poor in clarity. You aren't viewing sharply defined images of the model.
The composition of the photo is poor. The sets are inexpensive or cheap and lacking in any imagination.
Overall, the photo sets are a waste of storage space, and not worth viewing.
I was a member of this site before, and wrote a review that highlighted how poor the site was, in terms of the attractiveness of the models, the poor quality of the photo sets. But my memory is poor, and I forgot how unappealing the site was. Which is the reason I rejoined. I was stupid.
Other PU members seem to appreciate the site much more than I do. They cite the attractive models at the site, the ease of navigation, the low membership price. I agree the membership price can be low: PU has the first month's membership for $15, or $60 for a year.
I agree that navigation is simple and effective, that Vendo and Epoch are fine billers.
But I can't agree the models are attractive.
Poor models, poor photography. And that kills the site for me.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. A network devoted to horny teens.
-Many of the teen models are young and cute.
-Exclusive content.
-Videos are available in 270p through 1080p definition.
-Navigation is simple, since it's a tiny site.
-You get access to the entire network with a sub to any one of the sites. There are no premium sites that charge extra.
-There is a text description that accurately describes the video plot.
Cons:
-Archive site. Stopped updating in 2018.
-Tiny site. Only 16 videos. Plus matching photosets.
-Photosets are probably screencaps, and only available in one size. But the quality of the screencaps is OK to good.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on sign-up page.
-Model info is minimal: a few physical stats, and the model bio is complete nonsense.
Bottom Line:
-This is a tiny site that stopped updating in 2018. Only 16 videos, with matching photosets.
So you can view the site contents in less than a day, to see if any of the videos hold interest.
Many of the models are young, cute, slender white teens.
The videos are very good quality: crisp, clear visuals, with excellent lighting and sound control, good colors.
There isn't much plot to the videos, it's just two or more (mainly more) horny young teens fucking and sucking without any build-up.
So I would classify this as reality porn.
You have girl-girl, girl-boy, girl-girl-boy, throw in one or more girls to each, maybe add another guy to the mix. But it's straight sex, not really over-the-top, just straight sucking and fucking.
So the girls really need to be attractive to hold your interest, since there's almost no plot or meaning to the sex.
However, you have the rest of the network to look through after you've seen the small amount of videos at this site.
To be truthful, they could easily mix the small amount of videos at this site into one of the other sites, to reduce the number of network sites.
But that would be counter-productive: the larger the number of sites in a network, the more valuable it's supposed to be, even when some of the sites are archive and tiny.
Giving the site a score of 72. It's a tiny site, stopped updating years ago, and has very little interest, in spite of the cute models.
The star of the network is your access to Nubiles.net site. Nubiles.net is like an encyclopedia of teen porn models going back to around 2004. You can find thousands of teen porn starlets that were just starting out in their careers. Access to the Nubiles.net site is, by itself, worth the network price.
Edit: I should add there's some confusion over whether Nubiles.net site is included in the Nubiles Porn network. It definitely is included.
But some PU members have thought it was not included in the Nubiles Porn network, and might have paid extra for a Nubiles net membership, when they already had access with the Nubiles Porn membership.
For some reason, the Nubiles.net site is not displayed as prominently in the Nubiles Porn listings of sites included.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles-Porn network of teen sites. You get access with a membership in any one of the network sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Videos have your choice of definition of 270p through 1080p for streaming and downloading.
-Videos have an accompanying photoset. The photosets average around 165 photos per set.
-There is also a screencap photoset. The screencap photosets average around 32 screencaps per set. I don't know why you need a screencap photoset when you have a normal photoset. The photo photoset photos are much clearer, better focused than the screencap versions.
Cons:
-I think there are several major cons that reduce the value of the site.
The first con is that this is an archive site. The site started in December 2017, and only updated for 14 videos total. So it's a tiny site.
-The last video update was Oct 18, 2018. So the update rate was very slow.
-The videos are supposed to be comedies That I find un-amusing. I wish they tried to use a more realistic approach, or at least an approach without the juvenile humor and trite plots.
I think the New Sensations sites use a more realistic style that produces a better product.
Minor cons:
-A few ads on every member page.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Many of the models who are supposed to be Daddy's Lil Angel are in their mid-20s, instead of young teens. So they are a little old to be your regular Daddy's Lil Angel.
-Minimal information about the models they use.
Bottom Line:
The site theme is step-daughters have sex with their step-fathers. This is faux incest, where you're supposed to be thrilled by the illicit taboo of a step-father fucking his young step-daughter. Except the step-daughter is supposed to be 18 or older, so there is no problem of child porn. And I guess that step-relatives having sex, while illegal in some areas, is not as controversial as blood relatives having sex.
While the idea of step-father and step-daughter faux incest is a popular niche, I much prefer the Family XXX style at New Sensations which tries for a more realistic approach and focuses on the physical attractiveness of the models better.
Also, the level of attractive of the models at Daddy's Lil Angel is just OK. Nothing really special.
Since you're getting this site along with some better sites in the Nubiles Porn network, it pays to scan through the small amount of content to see if any of the videos interest you.
But I found this site to be one of the poorer sites in the network.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
