Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Videos are offered in 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p for streaming and downloads.
-Unlimited streaming for videos.
-Unlimited downloads for the photosets. But see the CONS section to see why the photosets are usually not worth collecting.
-Content is exclusive.
-Nice sized site. 214 videos.
Cons:
-Very slow update rate. One new video per month for the site.
-Limit of 100 video downloads for the entire network.
They allow you to download each scene as many times as you need, in any resolution, for a 24-hour period, and only one download will be deducted. So they are treating a video download as a precious commodity, which I find offensive. Technically, when you download a video from a paysite, or a movie from a streaming service, you don't own the video, you only have a privilege of viewing the video or movie. But for a porn paysite to push boundaries of download limits is not a practice I want to encourage.
-Limit of 4 video downloads per day for the network.
-A photoset of a video can hold anywhere from 6 to 23 photos. Most photosets hold around 6 to 13 photos. So the photosets are tiny to very small.
Bottom Line:
A Girl Knows is a lesbian site in the Lets Doe It network.
The site has 214 videos, plus a matching photoset for each video. I write "matching", when the photosets are actually limited to anywhere from 6 to 23 photos. Most of the models at the site are attractive to extremely attractive. Why they limit to photos to such a small number is fucking annoying. The site (and network) specializes in finding attractive models, they can put them in some very nice videos, and then they limit the photosets to a small number, which seems ridiculous. The photos can be very nice quality: high production values, good lighting and colors, mainly nicely focused. So it's like a tease: you want the whole package, not just a taste.
Contrast this with the photosets at the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn). The photos from the last few years at the Wow network compare favorably with the Lets Doe It photos.
Actually, the Wow network photosets are superior to the Lets Doe It photosets.
The Wow network photosets are not limited to 6 to 23 photos, but give you 80 to 100 photos or more, and cover most of any matching video. So you get the full package, and are not left wanting more.
The quality of the Wow network photosets is outstanding. The Wow network did not start out as a glamour network, it's been around for at least 16 years under different names. But the young models at the network go from attractive to stunningly beautiful, and the photograpy over the years has improved to where it's now as good as what you get at most glamour sites. The vibe at Wow networks is not glamour, it's more like lovely young girls having sex, with themselves, with other girls, with one or more boys. They're not going for glamour, but for straight sexual pleasure. But the videos and the photos are such high quality, with lovely young models, that it's borderline glamour.
You look at a few photosets from A Girl Knows, and you think: "What a waste. Why couldn't they create a full-sized photoset, instead of a tiny one?"
You look at photosets from the Wow network, and you think: "These girls are fucking lovely. Where can I find one of my own?"
And even though the Wow girls aren't on your street, at least you can drool over their videos and photosets.
Actually, if you compare the Wow network with the Lets Doe It network, or with the A Girl Knows site, there's no comparison: I think the Wow network is a far better value.
The photography and videos at the Wow network is excellent quality, with good production values. Not quite as good as The White Boxxx videos, but close.
The Wow network has unlimited downloads.
The Wow network membership is cheaper than the Lets Doe It membership.'
PU price for Lets Doe It network is $119.95 (recurring).
The PU site gives you a discount price of $89.95/year (recurring) for Wow network.
But if you search, you can often find a price of $69.95/year.
That membership gives you access to 4 sites:
All Fine Girls; Wow Girls; Wow Porn; Ultra Films.
The models at the 4 sites are attractive to lovely.
The videos and photosets are high quality.
If you enjoy lovely teen models who are into hardcore sex, you can't do better than the Wow network.
A Girl Knows is a good lesbian site. With high production values for the videos.
But the download limits are a turn-off.
And the slow update rate (1 new video per month) is also a turn-off.
If you have extra time and money, you can join the Lets Doe It network for 1 month to see what it has to offer. But I think there are better values in porn. The Wow network is one of the better values, along with a bunch of other sites, such as Adult Time, Adult Prime, etc.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A network of primarily European sites. Two of the sites, The White Boxxx and A Girl Knows, are excellent glamcore sites. The White Boxxx has some of the finest glamcore videos on the internet, where they make an art of presenting attractive models in crystal clear videos.
-There's no limit on streaming the videos or photosets.
-You can download unlimited photosets. But see the CONS section why the photosets are not worth collecting.
-Content is exclusive.
-The models at some of their sites are stunning. Really gorgeous.
Cons:
-The video definition maxes out at 1080p, which is suprising for a glamcore network. Many porn sites started offering 4K videos years ago.
-Almost all videos have an accompanying photoset. But the photosets are not worth collecting. The photosets are tiny, around 10-13 photos per set. I have no idea why the photosets have such a small amount of photos. Seems like a wasted opportunity, when you consider how attractive many of these models are.
-There is a limit of 100 video downloads per month for the entire network.
-There is also a limit of 4 videos per day.
-You only get around 10 or 11 new videos per month for the network.
-Only 4 of the 18 sites are still updating. Most of the network sites stopped updating years ago.
Bottom Line:
The network covers different niches. The White Boxxx features girl/boy sex and some threesomes. A Girl Knows is a lesbian site. Both of those sites are high quality glamcore, with top-notch production values. The videos at The White Boxxx are the finest glamcore hardcore porn I've seen on the internet: the models are uniformly gorgeous (they are attractive to begin with, and every effort is made to present them looking as beautiful as possible). The settings are in a white room with one or two models and a stunt cock. The theme is sensuous hardcore. The photography (I really mean videography, but it's so crisp, clear and vivid you realize you are watching moving images) is top-notch. This isn't story-driven sex, the plot is minimal, but you are watching a premium product at The White Boxxx, the crown jewel of the Lets Doe It network
However, the value of the network is constantly going down. And since the price is not getting any less expensive, there's less reason to join the network.
-A few years ago you had access to over 40 different sites. Then they split the network into different networks, each requiring a separate membership. The Lets Doe It network has 18 sites.
-As time goes on, they keep putting limits on the members.
They started limiting downloads to 100 videos per month for the network. Before then, there were no limits.
Now they have an additional limit of 4 videos per day.
-Due to covid, the last few years the updates for the network have decreased.
They are now updating with 10 or 11 new videos per month for the network. They used to give far more updates.
-Only 4 of the 18 sites are updating. The other 14 sites are archive sites, that haven't updated in years.
Inflation is everywhere. But it's stupid to keep paying the same price to get less porn, when there are so many great bargains in porn.
So I finally wised up, and will cancel my membership.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Used to be the finest glamcore site on the internet.
-The models are selected to be attractive to extremely attractive. They are showcased in a luxurious setting that sets off their beauty, with clear, crisp videos, strong colors, white background that allows you to focus on the model and the sensous sex on display.
-Videos have a definition from 240p through 1080p. That is both streaming and downloading.
-Sometimes you get a popup ad with a timer that counts down the hours, minutes, seconds the ad is supposed to be active. Ads an element of urgency to joining the site at the reduced price (sarcasm).
Cons:
-Due to the covid epidemic, the update rate for the site (and the entire network) has slowed.
Over the last year, the site has added about 4.5 new scenes per month.
The network update rate is very slow. Maybe 10 new videos per month for the network.
Most sites in the network stopped updating years ago.
LetsDoeIt network has 18 different sites.
Only 4 sites are still updating.
-They slapped a limit of 100 videos per month downloads for the network. Not just per site, but for the entire network.
-Photosets contain from 6 to 10 photos per set. Hardly worth collecting, even though the models range from attractive to lovely, because you get so few photos for each scene.
-There is no 4K option, even though many porn sites have offered 4K since 2015 or 2016. Which seems strange for a glamour-oriented site.
Bottom Line:
The site has 376 scenes. Each scene has a video and a photoset.
Because the photosets are so tiny, 10 photos or less per set, they are not worth collecting.
Because of the slow update rate (averaging 4.5 new scenes per month, for the site, about 10 new scenes per month for the network), I can't recommend a membership beyond 1 or 2 months.
And the limit of 100 videos per month for the network is also a negative.
Not offering 4K videos seems strange, especially for a glamour site. Many people want a 4K option, to view it on a big screen.
At one time I thought the network was a fine join.
No longer.
Not since the slower update rate, the fact that only 4 sites are still updating.
And the 100 video limit reduces the value still further.
Even though The White Boxx still produces some visually stunning erotic glamour videos, with models that look gorgeous, there are other sites that give you more quantity, with no download limits, and the quality of the competing sites can come close to what The White Boxxx offers.
The Wow network, for a reduced price of $70/year, if you catch one of their discounts, is a fine alternative. You wouldn't normally think the Wow network is high quality porn, but take a look at the videos and photosets they've offered in the last few years. Wow network has moved from a medium quality network to a high quality network on their content. Both videos and photosets. With no download limits. With good update rates. Wow doesn't go for glamour as such, but the videos are clear, crisp, with wonderful colors, and the girls range from cute to lovely.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You get access to the entire network. None of the sites require a premium membership.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Content is exclusive.
-The production and technical qualities of most videos is good to excellent: Nice sets, good to excellent lighting, colors, sound control, steady camera-work that is focused and well shot.
-The quality of the models is good to very good: a lot of cute or attractive or very nice-looking models. The models are late teens or early 20s.
-They normally try to have some plot to the videos. The acting is above average. The dialog is OK, which is better than the dialog of many porn sites. You don't have to cringe while watching these videos from the stupid acting or stupid plot or dialog: This isn't cinematic quality porn, but it's better quality than many hardcore porn sites.
Cons:
-Navigation can be tricky. You select the Jizz Bomb site, and the videos that load are all New Sensations network videos. Not only Jizz Bomb videos.
There's supposed to be a way to list the Jizz Bomb videos by date posted, but that system doesn't work. The chronological listing system works for most New Sensations sites, but not at Jizz Bomb. There isn't even the format that is supposed to give you the chonological listing.
There's a format to get an alphabetical listing of videos at Jizz Bomb. But the system doesn't bring up Jizz Bomb videos: it seems to give you a listing of New Sensations videos from different sites in the network.
Part of the problem is that a Jizz Bomb video is not watermarked as a Jizz Bomb video. Instead, it's watermarked as a New Sensations video. And there's often no text description on the page that categorizes the site the video belongs to.
So for many videos, you're left guessing what site the video belongs to.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Some Family XXX have a Family XXX watermark on their videos, but most network videos only have the "New Sensations" watermark. And most videos don't clearly have an external text listing that identifies which site they belong to.
-They use a limited number of stunt cocks in the videos. The models change frequently, for the different videos, but the stunt cocks normally appear in lots of the New Sensations videos.
-It appears the site stopped updating years ago. Since I can't get a chronological listing, I can't tell when the updates stopped.
-The earliest videos were only offered in 480p. Then they started offering 720p and 1080p.
Later still, they offered 4K. But I don't think there are any 4K videos offered at the Jizz Bomb site, because the site probably stopped updating before they offered 4K at the network. That's a guess, because I don't know when they stopped updating at this site.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
I think the site theme is heavy sex finishing with the stunt cock exploding his cum over the girl. At least, that's what the idea is supposed to be, from the site title. But after watching a number of videos from the site (or what I think are Jizz Bomb videos), the amount of cum the stunt cock sprays varies. You do get a money shot, where the stunt cock comes, but the amount can be tiny. Don't expect to see guys spraying tons of cum over a girl's body: face, ass, pussy, whatever. That's what the site title implies, but it's not what you get: you get tiny amounts of cum, or maybe a normal amount of cum. On average, you can expect a small amount of cum, but lots of saliva from the girl spitting and licking and sucking on the stunt guy's cock.
Also, dial down your expectations of heavy sex. There is sex, but it's more bread and butter sex, not really over the top. To watch over-the-top sex, a better site would be Teen Fidelity, which often has very energetic sex in plot-driven porn.
Navigation is poor. I don't know how to get a listing of Jizz Bomb videos. And if I watch a video, I often can't tell which site the video is supposed to belong to. Many or most videos only have the New Sensations watermark, not the watermark of the site they belong to. And there's no text description, or tags, or anything to indicate what site many videos belong to.
Years ago, there was a much better system of listing the Jizz Bomb videos: by both posting date and alphabetically.
I even wrote a review on the Jizz Bomb site on 02-07-19. At that time the site software gave a much better indication of what videos (and photosets) belonged to the jizz bomb site. But recently, I can't find any listing of videos that belong to Jizz Bomb.
I think the best site on the network is the Family XXX site.
Normally, I'm not a fan of fake incest sites, which is sex between step relatives.
Fake incest can add to the sexual tension of the video. And at Family XXX, they do a better job than most step-incest sites: the plots aren't as phony.
Especially the Amber Moore video titled "Amber's Teen Pussy Is Step Daddy's Favorite".
I don't think Amber Moore is the most beautiful model at the site or network, but this video really works: an attractive young woman, seducing her step-father.
The technical features are good to excellent: nice sets, lovely girl, simple but believable plot, good acting, good sex, not a lot of over-the-top moaning and groaning, fine lighting and camera-work: This is one of the better videos at the network.
I'm giving Jizz Bomb a score of 80. That's mainly because I don't know what the site is. But because you have access to the New Sensations network, and probably hundreds of videos are supposed to be belong to the Jizz Bomb site, I figure the site deserves a good rating.
Even if I can't tell what videos belong to the site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 1 Pass for All Sites network. Membership in any one site gives you access to all 35 sites in the network.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Large site. 272 videos (plus matching screencap sets).
-The main draw is how cute to fucking attractive these teen models are.
-The models are slender, white European girls, mostly late teens, or very early twenties.
-The models are often perky, and are eager and willing to fuck. This makes you wonder why they chose the site title "I Fucked Her Finally", since none of the girls are reluctant sex partners: they start sucking a dick, or having sex, at the drop of a hat. But you need a title for a site, and that's what they came up with.
-Also, there are tons of virgins at the site and network (in someone's imagination, obviously). So a virgin adds extra spice to your imagination, and a little reluctance is normal in a virgin. So the title refers obliquely to the virginal aspect of these cute teens.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-For the last few years, the download definition choices for a video are 360p through 2160p.
The videos from years ago had a max definition of 720p or 1080p, depending on when they were posted.
-Can view the screen cap sets from a zipped downloaded file, or the online slide show player.
Can set the timer for the slide show player from 5 seconds to 25 seconds intervals.
-There are hot links at the bottom of the home page to porn sites. Hit a link, and it opens a page of Rabbits Reviews. Cross advertising?
-You can add videos to a favorites list.
CONS(START OF):
-Very slow update rate. Usually 1 new video per month, but some months, might get no videos, or very rarely, 3 videos.
-No posting date for most videos.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Only the most recent videos will have a posting date shown on the "Recent Updates" page.
-The screen cap sets are screen caps: poor quality screen caps. A shame, since many of these models are cute to lovely, and deserve better treatment.
-Customer support is by email. There seems to be a telephone number, but I don't know how to use it: +44 20 3289 2048. Is that a telephone number? I'm guessing that is a European phone number, but I've never called Europe by phone, don't know how.
-You can rate the videos. But most videos have only 2 or 3 votes(ratings), which seems strange. This site (and the network) have been around for over 10 years now.
-The camera-work can be spotty. And the sound control is poor. I'm playing a video, and I'm wondering who's making noise outside of my house. Then I pause the video, and I realize the noises are coming from the fucking video. You're watching a girl masturbating, so where the fuck are the noises coming from? Poor sound control, that's the answer.
-The name of the model in each video needs to be more prominently displayed. You have to search the text description of the video to see if the name of the model is listed. Otherwise, you have no idea who the model is.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
There are 272 videos (and matching screen cap sets) at the site.
Video runtime is 20 to 40 minutes.
The matching screen cap sets go from 60 to 200 screen caps.
Watching these videos is an educational process. You learn that "Dah" means yes in Russian. This is the favorite expression a teen girl screams when she is getting fucked in her pussy or her ass.
The site focuses on slender white teen girls who love to suck cock, or take it up their pussy or ass. The girls are more vocal at this site than at 18 Virgin Sex. Maybe because they're no longer virgins?
The main selling point of the site (and network) is the good looking teen girls.
These girls are fresh, lovely, adorable, you just want to scoop them up and fuck their brains out. They aren't sluts: they just seem so cute and innocent, but they are full of hardcore passion.
The videos at the site are a guy and a girl having sex. Or maybe it's two guys and one girl having sex. The sex is bread-and-butter, sort of plain, not over the top. But what makes the videos worth watching is how attractive some of these girls are.
But not much effort is put into making these girls glamorous or presenting them to look their best: the girls are young and attractive, with little make-up, no fancy costumes, just OK sets. It's the girls themselves that are attractive.
And the truth is that the site does not present them as attractively as possible.
I'm looking at Olivia Grace, a cute young teenager, and I don't even recognize her.
She seems familiar, I think maybe I've seen her before.
Actually, I've seen her at many different porn sites, for many years now.
But in this video, "Clothed dude gets deep into naked babe's holes", at the I Fucked Her Finally site, I barely recognize her from the large-sized screen cap shot. She is nowhere near as cute or lovely as she is often seen. And the video itself is not clear and crisp images. The sound track is full of random noises: Olivia Grace is walking around in a large bedroom, just walking, and the sound track is full of random noises. Then you hear her breathing, and you realize the sound is turned way up, to magnify each sound in the almost-empty room.
I'm giving the site a score of 80. The girls are mainly attractive, but the videos suffer from poor technical production, and the screencaps are screencaps, not real photographs.
If the videos had better production values, and the screen cap sets were real photos, the site would have more value. Because the girls are cute teens.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Lets Doe It network. So you get access to about 17 channels.
-All content is exclusive.
-Unlimited streaming. But there's a download limit of 100 videos for the entire network per month.
Which seems very limiting.
-Scenes are available in definitions from 240p through 1080p. Seems strange they don't offer 4K videos, especially for a quality glamour network.
-There is a link to skip the intro part of a scene. Useful after you've watched the same intro again and again.
Cons:
-The main con is the irregular update rate. The site updates with 1 or 2 or 3 scenes per month.
-Flash page of ads on logging in to the network.
-Poor site layout, which makes navigating the site harder. Instead of a simple interface, you have a poorly laid out network page which has thumbnails of latest releases, popular this week, recently active porn stars, and a line of ads. Plus a line of porn awards won. Who needs this shit? Keep it simple, only show what's really useful, to make navigation easy.
-I was using a VPN because it's supposed to make surfing the internet safer. But I got an email message stating the LetsDoeIt site was concerned my account had been hacked. It requested I send a verification code to the site, which I did. Many experts recommend using a VPN for security, but many sites have equipment to detect a VPN and either question your identity or dis-allow access to the site.
-Photo sets are tiny. From 10 to 15 photos per set.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Photo sets have only 1 size definition zip file, which has a computer-generated name. So if you do want to collect these photo sets, you have to manually re-name the file with the name of the model, site, posting date, video title.
-The videography is not the crystal clear imagery used for the glamour sites. Instead, you get some jerky editing, some video-taped images with lines super-imposed on the images to show it's a video recording of the girl entering the hostel, filters or lack of attention to the outside lighting when the scene is outdoors: the idea is to show you a "real-life" take on the girl's experience. Which grows old fast.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Site has 63 scenes. Because you only get 1 to 3 new scenes per month, the site will grow slowly.
-The Lets Doe It network is primarily a glamour network. The White Boxxx, A Girl Knows, Xchimera are the primary sites that focus on glamour-styled porn. But the network tries to broaden its appeal by offering other niches, such as rough porn, travel porn, massage porn, etc.
The main strength of the network is selecting attractive looking models and then presenting them in a setting (nice sets, nice costumes, excellent technical features for lighting, sound control) that makes the models appear like glamorous movie stars instead of porn stars.
Horny Hostel site theme: A girl goes on a trip abroad, she checks into a hostel for a low-priced stay. There she meets a horny guy, and they fuck. Almost no build-up to the sex. European guys are all horny. And girls on vacation are also horny.
So this site is a step away from the glamour style.
Instead of glamour, this is supposed to be reality porn, or slice of life. The models do wear make-up, but it's minimal. The vibe is raw and slightly gritty. You've got girls on vacation, and either they start off showing their naked bodies--meaning their ready for sex--or they are innocents abroad who just happen to meet horny guys that set off erotic sparks in the girls, who turn out to be more than willing to fuck. No romance, just fucking.
But these girls are adult: they don't need romance or sweet talk before they start to have sex with a stranger they just met minutes ago. The guy is horny. The girl, is either horny to start with, or she is hiding that horniness under a calm exterior. And since this is porn, that reduces the need for dialog.
Actually, Bitches Abroad, a different channel in the Lets Doe It network, has a similar setup: Bitches Abroad has girls travelling to a different country, who hook up with a stranger and then have sex. But the videography is smoother, the plots make more sense, and the scenes are much more enjoyable. The models are more attractive, and they are presented more attractively. Which makes a big difference.
The imagery and esthetics of Bitches Abroad are refined compared to Horny Hostel's raunchy vibe.
Giving the site a score of 80. I don't care for the setup. I prefer a little build-up to the sex, or more meaning to the sex. Or some plot that makes sense, other than two horny strangers meeting and deciding to fuck.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bounty Hunter Porn is part of the Nubiles Porn network, which has about 17 different sites.
Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites. There are no premium sites you have to pay extra to access.
-Nubiles Porn currently has a special sale:
30 day membership: $12.95 for the first month, recurring at $14.95/month.
365 day membership: $84.00/year.
-Multiple funding choices: credit card, paypal, checking account, eu direct debit, other.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Unlimited downloading and fast streaming.
-Hardcore erotic videos.
-Top-quality production values. This is not a glamcore site or network, but the sets are clean, the videos and photosets are professionally shot, with good lighting, good sound control, good focus, etc.
-Network has weekly updates.
-Navigation is simple. Can easily switch to other sites using a hot link.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor.
-The main con is this is a tiny, archive site. Only 5 videos plus matching photosets. Last update was Sep 19, 2016.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-First page you see on logging in is an ad page: a page filled with ads for other sites, with no content from the network.
-There are ads for other sites on every member page. Very common for porn sites.
Bottom Line:
This site caters to PU members who fantasize about strapping a short-barreled Winchester to their leg, in homage to Steve McQueen, who starred in the TV series "Wanted: Dead or Alive".
I always wanted to enforce the law by tracking down evil but lovely young teens who broke the law.
No matter how much they might scream and plead, I would fuck them till their brains would explode, because that's what cops do: enforce the law on evil doers everywhere.
With such a strong premise, it's disappointing this is a tiny site.
The site has 5 videos. With matching photosets.
The technical features of the videos and photosets are good. The site was started around 2016, and the videos have a streaming and download choices of 270p through 1080p.
Why do I wish the site was larger, and still updating?
For several reasons:
-The plot/theme of a bounty stud hunting down and fucking a bad teen girl is simple and easily filmed.
It requires almost no acting ability, which is great, because most porn models are terrible actors.
The plots at many porn sites are stupid, and filled with bad dialogue. This site theme (a bounty guy hunting down a girl) should be easy to film, with simple dialogue that is less cringe-worthy than the average porn video. Only simple acting skills are required to show a guy grabbing a girl and then having sex with her, which is better justification than the un-realistic plots of many porn videos.
The selection of models at the site is good: these models are young, cute, nubile, and fit the template of the Nubiles Porn network.
Naomi Woods, Alexa Grace, Piper Perri, Alexa Nova, and Kirsten Lee are the models: what hot-blooded American male looking at these models wouldn't fantasize about grabbing these girls and forcing them to have sex, especially since you are supposed to have the force of the law backing you up when you grab these girls?
The law teaches you that cops support other cops, in the performance of their duty.
So if the criminal cute girl wants to pay you off with a little nookie, what cop would say no?
Also, the faces of the bounty hunter studs are blurred in the videos.
This is to protect the identity of the studs.
How could these videos be improved?
The main improvement would be to resume updates. Which won't happen, since the last update was over 5 years ago.
Minor improvements would be to give the bounty hunter studs flashier vehicles. A Maserati or Ferrari would be my choice of vehicle to chase these girls. The bounty hunter stud drives a van, which is a let down. Give him a upscale car like the cars the Miami Vice cops drive.
A screaming siren would be nice, with flashing lights. I want any vehicles on the road to pull off the road and stop, to show how important I am when I go zooming down the road.
Porn is fantasy, and my fantasy is to show the world that I am the greatest, most important PU user on the road.
The producers of this site were wrong to stop updating this site. The site theme is more believable than many of the network sites that are currently updating.
I'm giving the site a score of 80, because the site models are cute girls, the site theme is easily filmed, and navigation is simple and easy, for checking the site contents, for switching to other sites in the network using a hot link.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Simple, basic, non-glamour, softcore solo photo site.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Navigation is simple, based on this is a photoset only site (except for some "Staff Selection" videos and photosets which cost extra to download).
-You get low, medium and high definition download and online viewing of the photosets.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-No videos (except for the limited "Staff Selection" videos, which cost extra to download.
-The number of photos per set is surprisingly small. Often less than 50 photos in a set.
-Slow update rate. Down to about 2 sets per week. Used to be 5 sets per week, years ago.
-High membership price. Used to be $10/month or less, years ago. Then, in 2016, MetArt raised the price to $30/month or $100/year.
-No bonus sites (except for the live cam shows).
-The photos are high quality, but use a simple, basic style: solo female model, very simple indoor or outdoor setting, non-glamour. A set can start out with a girl wearing inexpensive clothes, or can start out with the girl already nude. But it's not a tease or strip, you are just viewing nude photos of the girl walking around, lying on the floor, I mean, very simple poses.
-Pre-ckecked cross-sale on join page.
I think of myself as a meat and potatoes guy. Maybe a purist or connoisseur could tell the difference between the two sites. I can't tell. To me, both sites are essentially similar. The main difference is that the two sites have different names. But any content from one site could have been posted in the other site.
In the same manner, All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are three different sites. Sharing many or most of the same models. Sharing many or most of the same themes: teen female nudity and sex, softcore and hardcore. The content at any one of the three sites could have been posted at the other two sites. To illustrate this point, a video posted at one site has, in the past, had the accompanying photoset (the photoset that was made during the shooting of the video) posted at the other site: For example a Wow Girls video had the photoset made during that video shoot posted at Wow Porn. And vice versa. So the sites not only shared many or most of the same models, but also shared the same themes, photographers, technical crew, etc.
The above is not a criticism of any of sites I mentioned. Domai and Goddess Nudes are fine sites.
All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn are fine sites, and the three sites are one of my favorite porn networks. Currently, the three sites are marketed as a single network: you join any one of the three sites, and you get access to all three sites. And for several months now, you also get access to Ultra Films, another fine site with the same models from what is now called the Wow network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn).
The Wow network used to be called the Diesel network years ago.
Wow network plus Ultra Films have been having a special for 6 months or more: you can join the Wow network and Ultra Films for $70/year. Which is a great price: I paid more than that for the Wow network, and I paid a separate membership fee for Ultra Films. And now you get all 4 sites for less than I was paying for Wow network. For less than what I paid for Ultra Films.
I'm sorry I'm going off-topic in this review. But if you haven't ever joined the Wow network before, or if you have but aren't a current member, I highly recommend joining the Wow network plus Ultra Films, if you can find the special discount of $70/year for the 4 sites.
That's if you are a fan of lovely young teens in hardcore action. With some softcore content, as well, but mainly hardcore action.
Going back to Goddess Nudes. Goddess Nudes is softcore nudity.
Like Domai, Goddess Nudes is photoset only. No videos.
Let me explain about the no videos statement: there are a few videos at the site. But they are listed as "Staff Selection". This means that to download any Staff Selection video you have to pay extra to download it. The same Staff Selection videos are also posted at all the MetArt network sites. So the Staff Selection videos are a feature of the MetArt network of sites, and not basically a feature of any one individual MetArt network site.
Also, if you are a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you can download all the Staff Selection videos, without paying extra. But that's only if you are a lifetime member.
To become a lifetime member of any MetArt network site, you normally have to pay $400 to $800, which is a one-time fee. Lifetime members of a site have free access to that site.
With full lifetime streaming and downloading privileges.
The same setup and features of Domai are repeated at Goddess Nudes: you get limited physical data on the models, but no bios.
The update rate used to be 5 updates per week. The same as Domai.
But like Domai, the rate has slowed to about 2 updates per week.
Most of the models are slender white girls, late teens or early twenties.
From the website, the following stats are shown:
Number of photosets: 2634
Number of models: 1143
Contributing photographers: 143
Photosets contain from 30 to 100 or more photos. But most sets are under 50 photos.
The photography is excellent, but it uses a simple, non-glamorous style: Not a lot of make-up on the models, the clothing is simple, not expensive.
You get a mix of indoor and outdoor shoots.
Strictly softcore. Solo women only photoshoots. No men allowed.
REVIEW CONTINUES IN THE FIRST REPLY SECTION:
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Love Hairy is part of the Metart network. So you can expect the fine technical features of the Metart sites: Logical site structure, with easy navigation.
-Photosets have 3 main definitions: small, medium, large, with a zip file for each definition.
-The membership is inexpensive: $7.99/month, or $60/year. I don't know if this is a PU discounted price, or the regular price.
-The model listing can be sorted by alphabet or ratings (ratings by the members). The model listing is oversized thumbnails that give you a very good look at the model's face.
-Support is 24/7. This is email support. I don't believe Love Hairy support has live chat or a phone service.
-Excellent search engine.
-Lots of tags to explain/support the content(photosets and videos). Can use them to search for items of interest. But I prefer to use the model index, myself.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Nice photo player for streaming photosets.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Metart support watches the PU site, and often responds to reviews and comments about the Metart network with helpful suggestions and information.
CONS(START OF):
-Site content is not exclusive. All or most of the content has previously been posted at other sites in the Metart network.
-There are 172 videos, but the overwhelming amount of content is photos. You have 1,253 photosets. So the site is more for photo lovers than video lovers.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-They advertise daily updates, but the real update rate is very irregular. Probably because of the covid epidemic.
Bottom Line:
The site is a depository of models who have pubic hair.
The modern trend is for models to have no hair on their pubic area.
Except that some people prefer the older style where women did not shave their pussies clean.
Call it a fetish to prefer women with pubic hair. Or call it the natural look. Except even when it was normal for softcore porn to have women with pubic hair, the pubic hair was normally groomed or manicured.
A few models might have armpit hair, or hair on their legs, but those would be a definite minority. The site focuses on women with pubic hair.
Most men seem to prefer the clean-shaven pubic area on women, from the comments I've read at the Metart sites I visit.
Unless a women has a forest growing down between her legs, I think pubic hair can look attractive.
And the models at Love Hairy are definitely worth viewing. They are among some of the most beautiful women in the world. The Metart sites have, for over 20 years, been showcasing attractive teens and slightly older women.
The Love Hairy is more focused on photosets than videos, but you get both.
1,253 photosets. 172 videos. 490 models. 151 contributing photographers.
With a large number of photographers, you get to sample their different styles, although the basic approach is glamour photography.
If you're familiar with Metart.com, the main site in the Metart network, you will have seen most of the models at Love Hairy. The models at Love Hairy range from attractive to gorgeous.
You have hundreds of the loveliest women in the world featured here.
Go to the public pages of Love Hairy, and page through the model listing, and I believe you will agree with me. The thumbnails are mostly headshots, but many of these women could have been finalists in any major beauty contest in the world. They are that attractive.
This is psychological. And maybe it only applies to me. But the main Metart site, Metart.com, is too big. It has too much content. I get bored looking through their model listing, in spite of the lovely models. The physical beauty of the models loses its impact.
Although Love Hairy has fewer models (490 models at Love Hairy, versus 3,821 at Metart), and most of the models at Love Hairy also appear at MetArt, I can appreciate the models at Love Hairy more easily.
This is complicated.
Partially, it's because the brain gets overloaded with the huge amount of Metart content: too much of a good thing, and your appreciation starts to dwindle.
Partially, it's because I had a couple of bad experiences at Metart. I used to love the Metart site, even paid for a lifetime membership. But then I made a couple of comments at the site, and got flammed. This is foolish on my part, but I no longer love the site. I thought the Metart membership was supposed to support each other, but it turns out the Metart membership is composed of regular humans, who can be real dickheads at times.
I'm being foolish, and I'm aware of it, but I no longer respect the Metart membership.
I visit the site, since I paid for it, but I no longer look at the site with rose-colored glasses. Metart is a fine site with a lot of great models and great photography, but I no longer love the site.
And I'm reluctant to support any Metart sites with a paid subscription.
End of story.
Bottom line: Love Hairy is a fine site.
You have hundreds of lovely young women.
You have some of the best glamour photographers contributing their work.
You have a low membership price: both monthly, and yearly.
I don't think many PU members would go for a yearly membership, because of the slow update rate. WeAreHairy is a competing site in the hairy niche. It's far more expensive than Love Hairy, and the models are less attractive. But it updates faster, the videos and photosets are exclusive, and PU members seem to prefer it over Love Hairy for satisfying the hairy niche.
The main negative for We Are Hairy is the price: $34.95/month, or $79.95 for 3 months. Which is very expensive.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site is part of the Full Porn Network, which advertises that is has over 15 different sites. I counted 21 sites currently.
-Can use PayPal or Epoch as your biller.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-Site updates with 1 new video every 5 days.
-Videos come with a photoset and screen cap set.
-The videos are crystal cleal, crisp, good lighting, good sound control, nice sets, etc.
-They advertise 4K definition for some of the videos. However, at this site, the maximum definition is 1080p.
-You can comment on the videos, but many of the videos have no member comments.
-Videos come with tags that basically describe the sex action/plot of the video.
-You can choose 1024 or 1600 zip for your photosets.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading, as far as I can tell.
-Download options include: 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K.
The site shows a 4K option for some videos, but the links to download 4K and 1080p didn't work for me.
Cons:
-Expensive site and expensive network.
$119.88 for the first year.
Or $39.95/month.
But I joined at $60 for the first year, on a holiday promotion.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-First member page after logging in is a page of ads, no site content.
-Ads at top and bottom of each member page.
-The level of attractiveness of the models is below average for many teen sites such as Teen Mega World, and far below the average of the Wow network models.
-Videos are often 10 minutes runtime or less.
-Streaming options are 480p and 720p for the latest site videos. Which is disappointing, because the network advertises 4K videos.
-Many photosets are small. Only 15 photos per set. The photos are excellent, shot by a professional photographer, well-focused, well-lighted, but the action covered is only a part of the video. However, when the photosets are larger, the quality of the photos goes way down. I don't know if it's a photoshop problem or what. Sets are not worthwhile collecting.
Bottom Line:
A partial listing of the sites you get access to with a membership in the network:
Analized
Bad Daddy POV
DTF Sluts James Deen
Only Prince
POV Perverts Twisted Visual
Your Mom Does Porn
The James Deen site is the most famous site in the network. James Deen is the owner of the network, and he has made a name for himself in the porn world, with a lot of female fans who think he is not only cute, but strong and dominant in the way he treats women in his videos.
The network features rough sex, a lot of anal sex, where the women are treated like sluts.
The site theme is fake incest: a bad stepfather has sex with his stepdaughter.
The site is supposed to be educational. Which is misleading. I didn't find any helpful clues about how to treat a girl during sex.
The intro section of each video starts with the disclaimer:
"ATTENTION
The performance you are about to watch is meant for entertainment purposes only. It should not be seen as a model for real-life sexual encounters. We recommend honest, clear, and ongoing communication with your partner(s) before any sexual encounter. All actors in this film are consenting adults who follow specific adult industry regulations. Please have fun, respect each other, and practice safe sex."
However, that disclaimer is for legal purposes only.
In an interview James Deen gave, he said underage teens could watch his videos and get a good idea of how to have exciting sex.
The titles of some of the videos seem to be instructional.
For example, "Brooke Haze: Helps You Cum With Jerk Off Instructions".
I was slightly disappointed with that video, and other videos with a similar title.
For one thing, the video is a solo model video, where the girl role-plays being your step-daughter and slowly strips while talking dirty.
I was hoping a guy would be there, and the girl could show you the best way to masturbate while watching the video.
But I guess you're left on your own, to figure out how to masturbate, because there is no guy in the video showing you the best moves.
Actually, the Jerk Off Instruction videos follow the same pattern.
A short video, 10 minutes or less, features a teen model stripping and talking dirty.
So there's no real instruction.
The model touches herself, but if there's any passion, it's in what you yourself bring to the video. The model is putting on a show, so if that's enough to get you off, fine. But many porn site videos with solo models feature masturbation, and this site, for the Jerk Off Instruction series, is mainly tease with dirty talking. When I say tease, I mean the dirty talking, the self-fondling, the nudity is supposed to turn you on, because you are watching young girls playing with themselves and stripping and role-playing talking to you as their daddy.
The videos where the girl is with a stunt cock are better. The girl and her step-father have sex. The step-father is usually off-screen. I guess you are supposed to place yourself into the scene as the step-father. Sometimes the step-father punishes the girl by slapping her ass, but it's mild punishment, and the girl undressses following the step-father's instructions, because slapping a girl's ass covered by clothes is not as effective or as fun as slapping a naked ass.
And you need a way to get the clothes off the girl if you're going to fuck her anyway.
(The plots are simple in the site videos.)
The sex at the site is less rough and not as brutal as some of the other sites in the network.
The girls put on a show, and the idea of sex with your stepdaughter is prominent, but the girls don't show a lot of resistance at having sex with their stepfather.
Sex with a step- is supposed to be kinky, but a common theme in porn in the last few years.
I thought the site was one of the tamer sites in the network.
The network mainly features rough sex, anal sex, and treating the girls as sluts who want to be dominated.
This site features girls who are role-playing to a step-father who wants to have sex with his daughter.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-If you want to join any of the sites in the network, join through the 18Videoz site.
The reason: $60/year is the normal price for joining the 18Videoz network.
But if you join through one of the sites in the network, you will probably pay:
$29.95/month, or $39.95 for 3 months.
-The models are young teens and mainly very attractive.
They are Eastern European girls, and if you've joined Teen Mega World, the Wow network, Team Skeet, you've probably seen a lot of these models already.
-Part of the 18Videoz network. So you get access to 16 sites. Which is a large number of sites.
-They advertise daily updates for the network. But the actual update rate is 5 or 6 times per week for the network. The update rate for the Casual Teen Sex site itself is 2-4 videos per month.
-The login is secure (https).
-Started adding 4K definition on Nov 28, 2016 on some new network videos. But the highest definition at Casual Teen Sex videos is still 1080p.
-Upgraded the video player on May 30, 2016.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-You can favorite videos, models, and photosets.
-Physical data on the models includes: age(when shot), DOB, Nationality, Ethnicity, Height, Weight, Hair Color, Eye Color.
CONS(START OF):
Major cons:
-The main con is the site (and network) don't showcase the models as attractively as they should be presented. Many of these girls are found at Teen Mega World, the Wow network, even some on MetArt. At Teen Mega World, the same girls are prettier. At the Wow network, they usually look even better. And if they appear at the MetArt site, they look even more attractive.
So the impact of the girls videos at Casual Teen Sex is diminished.
I mean some of these girls are attractive to fucking gorgeous, but you wouldn't know it from watching these videos. The site (and the network) is trying to provide a casual, everyday visual experience of a fly-on-the-wall of these sexual encounters, but they are wasting the physical beauty of the models.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Minor cons:
-Every so often, your password will not be accepted. So you have to re-set your password.
Which is easy. You have to solve a captcha to re-set your password.
-The username and password are computer-generated, so you have to write them down or use a password manager to remember them, because your mind won't remember either the username or the password assigned to you (unless you have a photographic memory).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Sound control when scenes are outdoor is sloppy. You hear extraneous loud noises, such as the wind or whatever.
-The models usually speak in some Eastern European language, with no subtitles. But once the models start moaning and groaning, from arousal or excitement, subtitles aren't needed.
-The 3 larger thumbnails at the top of the members page are ads, which you realize after clicking on them and, instead of bringing up a video to watch, you bring up a new site to join.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site (and network) is hardcore teen porn.
-The network has 3,316 videos.
-The network has 2,287 models.
-The network has 217,718 pictures.
I wrote that the 18Videoz network has 16 sites you get access to.
You get 2 additional bonus sites, which include Teens Analyzed and 18 Pussy Club. The 2 bonus sites are technically not part of the 18Videoz network. Until late 2020, Teens Analyzed (and probably 18 Pussy Club) were part of the 18Videoz network.
You still get access to the 2 sites, with a membership in the Videoz network, except the 2 sites are now considered "bonus sites".
This is the first time I've ever seen this: sometimes the member pages are non-secure, and sometimes they are secure. But the login is always secure, as far as I can tell.
The site theme is a guy picking up a new girl on the street. They talk for a few minutes, then go to an apartment and kiss and then have sex. So the setup to the sex lasts a few minutes. But the girls are hot to trot.
If, instead of a guy picking up a girl on the street, a guy might come over to a girl's apartment, to fix an appliance, or to just meet her. And since the girl is horny, and the guy picks up on her signals right away, they are soon touching and stroking each other and having sex.
So not a lot of plot or build-up to the sex.
The site started in late 2009.
Currently the site has 416 videos, with matching photosets.
The earliest videos feature cheap sets, cheap street wear costumes. The earliest videos have 240p to 480p definition.
1080p definition was introduced in 2010.
As time went on, the sets featured better apartments, better street wear costumes, and better equipment to videotape the scenes.
But the plot, or lack of it, remained the same: boy meets girl, they start kissing and fondling in a few minutes, and then the sex.
The main attraction, other than the hardcore sex, which becomes boring after a while because it's so repetitious, is how cute the teen girls are. But as I said, these girls are not presented as attractively as they should be. So the videos lack impact.
Giving the site a score of 80.
The girls are attractive.
The sex is hardcore.
But the thrill is gone, baby. I want to watch something that is arousing, erotic, has some story or passion to give the sex some meaning or impact.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site is part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a premium setup:
Easy navigation, lots of attractive models, all the bells and whistles you find at the other MetArt sites: multiple definitions for photosets, unlimited downloads, numerous contributing phototographers, easy navigation, etc.
Cons:
-Slow update rate. You get 2 photosets per week. Since photosets are the only content offered, that is a major fault.
-There are no bonus features at the site. Or maybe you can call the cam shows a bonus feature, but that is the same standard pay cam show featured at all the Metart sites.
-The are no videos at the site. A minor fault, since most Metart videos tend to be boring, in spite of the lovely models.
-At least some of the photoset updates were probably shot years ago. By models who apparently retired years ago. This includes Camilla A, Caramel, etc. Actually, many sites in the Metart network are running out of sets photographed recently due to the covid epidemic, and are using old content as updates.
-I think the Erotic Beauty online slideshow player is clunky: you have a choice of a large thumbnail which only takes a small portion of your monitor, or an enlarged photo that expands beyond the limits of your monitor. The enlarged photo is meant for detailed viewing.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
I want a simple slideshow player that fits the image onto the monitor, which is what most other sites offer.
-The photosets offer fewer tags (descriptors) than most Metart sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Erotic Beauty is not a poor site. But when you compare it to Metart, it suffers. Metart updates with 4 new photosets or videos per day, except on the first of each month, it has 6 updates. Erotic Beauty updates with 2 photosets per week. Metart has far more contributing photographers, so you get a wider range of styles. Metart photographers: 289 Erotic Beauty photographers: 189
The catalog of Metart is massive: 22,234 photosets versus 5,243 at Erotic Beauty.
The number of models at Metart: 3,811. Models at Erotic Beauty: 2,184.
Number of videos at Metart: 1,781. Erotic Beauty videos: 0
(Except most videos at Metart are boring and a waste of space. Not worth collecting, no matter how lovely the models are in real life.)
The membership price for Erotic Beauty is the same as the price for Metart.
So if you're going to join one of the Metart glamour sites for the photosets, choose Metart. Erotic Beauty comes in a distant second.
Note: if you're wondering why I've been a member for over 12 months, years ago I found a special offer of $1/month membership.
So for $1 a month, I'm still a member.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. Membership in any one of the sites gives you access to all 17 sites in the network.
-Tiny site. Only 5 videos (and matching photo sets). So you can view and download the entire site in less than a day. That's a pro and a con. Pro, that you can easily see and download the entire site in less than a day. Con, in that once you've viewed/downloaded the videos, the site itself has nothing more to offer. Except that you also have access to the rest of the network.
-The site theme is bounty hunters chasing bad girls and then having sex with them. This is an easier plot to follow than most teen porn site themes, because it requires less acting on the part of the girls. All the girls have to do is cry and plead to be freed, which is simple acting. Much easier acting than trying to follow some script where the girl is supposed to show emotion and the girl just looks stupid because she's not an actress.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
I'm not saying the bounty hunter plot is believable, but it's more believable than many of the teen hardcore plots that sites come up with.
And since you only have 5 videos at the site, you don't start to get bored with the same plot being used over and over again.
-Easy site navigation. With only 5 videos at the site, it's easy to see all of them. The only thing simpler navigation would be if they only had 1 video at the site, which would definitely make the site navigation even simpler.
CONS(START OF):
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Tiny site. Only 5 videos (and matching photo sets).
-Archive site.
The first video at the site is dated Dec 18, 2015.
The last video at the site is dated Sep 19, 2016.
So the update rate was very slow and erratic.
Bottom Line:
The videos are available for streaming and downloads from 270p through 1080p
The video runtime is about 20 to 30 minutes.
The photo sets have about 80 to 100 photos.
The faces of the bounty hunters are blurred, to protect the innocent. But faces (and bodies) of the criminal girls are shown, along with their entire bodies. No blurring for the girls, who are really dirty sluts, except they must have taken a bath before the video was shot, because their bodies are clean and white in stunning color.
Site theme: The models are cute teens. But they are bad girls, who are wanted by the law. Once a bounty hunter sees the girl, he chases her down. Your heart goes out to these girls, because they are so young and pretty, and you know, in your heart, they didn't mean to commit any crime. But the bounty hunter is relentless, and he either ties her up, or puts her in handcuffs.
The girls are terrified, and plead to be set free.
The bounty hunter is a mean son of a bitch, who ignores the girl's pleas. But maybe, just maybe, the bounty hunter is also a little bit human. And he is attracted to the girl, because she is young and cute. Once the girl is on her knees, and somehow rubbing the bounty hunter's cock (because a girl on her knees close to a guy's crotch instinctively knows to start rubbing a guy's cock), the hunter and girl start to get even closer. The girl knows the bounty hunter is a mean son of a bitch, and that turns her on. And the hunter knows the girl is willing to do anything to be set free. So, an unconscious is struck, where the guy and the girl are going to have sex.
This is the dramatic plot that guides these videos.
Be prepared to hold back your tears of pity for these vulnerable girls, because the bounty hunter, a bad man with a strong cock, will make these girls squeal with pleasure while he is borking them like crazy.
The fact that some of these girls, while cute, are also tiny teens, just adds to the pleasure of seeing them get off with the bounty hunter.
The idea for the site is great. I don't understand why they only made 6 videos for the site, before stopping the series. The site theme is at least as good as most of the rest of the network themes, and the models are able to act out the plot more believably than many of the other site themes.
Also, even though this is forced sex, the sex is not rough or crude or violent. It's just straight, hardcore sex, with no slapping, hitting, spitting, cursing, etc. The girls squeal a lot, but that's supposed to show sexual excitement, not pain or torture.
So, even though this is a tiny site, it does a good job of filling the niche for dominant male, submissive female story line. And the fact that the models are cute teens, and mainly petite, just adds to the theme.
The twist at the end of the video is that the girl, who has been given the fuck of her life, expects the bounty hunter to let her go free.
But the bounty hunter is a dominant male. He knows he gave a thrilling fuck, and he is still going to turn her over for the bounty. So he's fucked her twice: once sexually, and a second time because the girl thought she was exchanging sex for freedom, and she is wrong: she is still going to jail for the bounty hunter to be paid.
It's a man's world, kitten.
End of story.
Makes you feel good you're a man. And can fuck these poor girls over again and again.
How can they improve the site?
The easiest way would be to start adding new content to the site.
A second method would be for the bounty hunters to add a siren to their chase vehicle, which a van.
They need to upgrade to a Maserati or some exotic sports car which can go zoom-zoom while they are chasing the girls, and blast their siren to add to the excitement. That would get the blood racing of the male audience, who want to jump on their Harley-Davidson motorcycles and help capture the girls.
In your mind's eye, you can see yourself zooming along the streets and highways, helping the bounty hunters catch hold of these girls, maybe holding them down while the bounty hunters use handcuffs or ties to subdue the runaway teens, maybe even helping the bounty hunter while he has sex with the girl.
And at the conclusion of the video, you can imagine yourself telling the girl: "Crime does not pay."
That's almost as good as watching the creampie the bounty hunter leaves on the girl's pussy.
Porn is fantasy. So why not go all the way, and imagine you're part of the video. Either as an active participant who is helping the bounty hunter. Or acting as the bounty hunter himself.
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
That's because, in spite of the tiny amount of content (5 videos and matching photo sets), I think the videos do a great job showing how men can dominate and control women in the real world.
You also get access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network of 17 sites.
Without access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network, which has a lot of lovely young teens, the score would drop considerably.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main pro is that the site serves as an encyclopedia of nude appearance by movie stars in movies.
An easy way to check if a movie star appeared nude or semi-nude in movies. More suitable for fans of movie stars, instead of fans of erotic content.
-Unlimited downloading and streaming.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-The introductory page after login is a page of ads. Normally, I don't consider ads a positive, but there are only a few ads for major sites, and some of the membership prices are very low: MetArt, for example, has a $60 annual membership listed, which is the lowest price I've seen for that site.
-The clips usually end with a "SkinVision" segment, where they replay the "sexy part of the clip" in slow motion, so you can re-watch the "best part of the clip".
-A low membership price: $60/year. They often offer a lifetime membership for $100.
-Excellent search engine.
Cons:
-The tags describing a clip can be misleading:
A tag says breasts, but the model/actress can be wearing a bikini or a blouse, and the breasts are not naked, but covered by material. You figure she has breasts, because she is female, but you can't see them.
Or the tags say ass, and the model has an ass, but it's covered by a bikini bottom or shorts.
-The clips are not erotic. They are too short to be erotic. Even when the clip is from the erotic part of a movie, you lose the impact of the movie because the build-up to the clip is missing, and the clip itself lacks the original meaning of the scene. And when I say the clip is too short to be erotic, you have a clip of two minutes or less, so it's like a fleeting glance, instead of a full-blown experience.
An erotic photo or photo set can, and usually is, a more complete and satisfying experience instead of the Mr Skin short movie clips.
-The quality of the clips is disappointing. The clips from movies are degraded definition.
Bottom Line:
The site is for fans who want to search for brief clips of movie stars nudity.
The clips are not erotic. They are mainly short clips, 2 minutes or less, with minimal build-up.
As an encyclopedia of movie star nudity, it serves a useful function.
But I feel Mr Skin is built for fans of movie star nudity, and not for fans of erotic content.
If you want erotic content, go for a fine photo site, like MPL Studios or MetArt or other softcore glam sites.
Or if you're into hardcore teens, the Wow Girls/Wow Porn sites, X-Art, Teen Mega World offer a lot of value.
Or a hardcore glamcore network like LetsDoeIt is a fine choice.
Even though Mr Skin is catalogued as an erotic site, since it focuses on nudity in movies, it is not a site to go to for erotic content. Instead, you go to the site if you have an itch to see if a favorite movie star has done any public (movie, tv) nudity.
There's a reply from PU member marcdc1 on 2019-04-25 that sums up the site:
"I keep checking out Mr. Skin and so far haven't pulled the trigger - mostly because I fear it's going to feed my curiosity - but not my libido".
I'm giving the site a score of 80.
It's a good site for what it does: There's a huge amount of short clips, many of them non-nude. As an encyclopedia of movie star near-nudity or nudity, it does a good job.
I just wish the quality of the clips was better, the clips were longer to include a build-up to the scene to give it greater impact.
As a site of erotic content, it's disappointing.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The main draw for the site is the cute models. These are Eastern European girls, mainly late teens or early 20s.
Slender, white girls, that Russia is famous for flooding the internet porn sites with. If you're familiar with Russian teen porn, you've seen many of these girls featured at other porn sites.
-Unlimited streaming and downloads.
-Exclusive content. The videos are original to the site.
-Can switch between sites easily.
Cons:
-The videos seem washed out. I don't like the skin-tones of the models. Maybe if I had more control over my monitor features I could slightly correct the colors, but it really detracts from the attractiveness of the models.
-The videos are not clearly dated.
-I believe the site stopped updating years ago. Before then, the update rate was very slow or erratic.
-Little or no information on the models.
-The text description of the video is worthless. Did the writer even bother to watch the video before writing the description?
Bottom Line:
I wish I could rate the site higher. But the lack of updates (I think the site stopped updating years ago), and the washed out colors of the videos, combine to make this site a wasted opportunity of showcasing attractive young models.
u
The site has 297 videos, which is a large amount, considering how slowly the site updated while it was still active.
One interesting fact is going back to the earliest videos at the site, and watching how young some of these Russian stunt cocks look. You've seen these same Russian stunt cocks hundreds or thousands of times if you're into Russian teen porn, and it just strikes me how the Russian stunt cocks can last for years in the business, while the lovely young teen models get used up within a few years.
Maybe it' just me, but I watch these videos with the attitude of an observer: there's no heat or passion from the videos, just young teen flesh on display that should be arousing, but is not. Maybe I'm getting older (I'm in my 70s), and porn doesn't do it for me any more. Except I do respond to some videos at better sites, or to lovely softcore images at Metart or other sites.
This site lacks heat or much to interest me. Maybe someone else will find it more appealing to their tastes.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Give Me Teens is a channel in the Adult Time network.
Years ago it used to be part of the Devils Film/Fame Digital network.
My best guess is that it still is part of Devils Film; if you go to the site: givemeteens.com,
the page shows "Devil's Film presents Give Me Teens".
Joining Give Me Teens, or Devils Film, gives you access to Adult Time network.
And vice versa: joining Adult Time gives you access to Devils Film and Give Me Teens.
And in the Adult Time website, Give Me Teens has the text "Part of devilsfilm".
-The channel has videos dating back to 2006, so you can find porn stars when they were first starting out.
-The site is a smorgasbord of teen, boy/girl, 3-somes, lesbian, cocksucking, vaginal and anal sex, with plenty of young/old sex as well.
Cons:
-The earliest videos were low-rent videos filmed in 240p and 480p definition.
-Cheap sets, mainly unattractive models, stupid or unimaginative dialog, poor acting, makes watching most of these videos a waste of time.
I would far rather watch well-produced videos with attractive models. Why waste time on crap?
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
Give Me Teens stats:
Videos: 1412
Video runtime: averages around 35 minutes.
Normally, I give any chanel in the Adult Time network a score in the 90s, because of the vast amount of hardcore content covering a wide variety of niches, and because most of the content is good to very good.
However, the models at Give Me Teens are not very attractive.
The models at the Wow/Diesel sites are far superior in looks. The models at many teen sites are far more attractive.
The plots are stupid, the dialog is stupid, the acting is poor.
In my opinion, the Adult Time network would be improved if they deleted the Give Me Teens channel.
Why keep low quality crap like the Give Me Teens channel?
Adult Time has thousands of teen-oriented videos apart from the Give Me Teens channel, so there's no need for over 1,000 videos featuring almost entirely unattractive teens with stupid plots, stupid dialog, poor acting.
I do admit there are a few attractive teens at the channel.
But slogging through the junk to find the attractive teens is not worth the effort.
When the site first started out, and for a few years afterwards, they did put effort into using attractive teens. But those early videos are only available in 240p and 480p definition, and most PU members wouldn't watch such low-definition videos. They would require 1080p or higher.
Edit: I'm being hard on this site. If you enjoy watching porn that reminds you of your first experience with porn videos, this site might give you some nostalgia value: the sets seem cheap, the acting is atrocious, the models look like porn stars (not a compliment). But I remember watching Emmanuelle, the French softcore porn movie around 1974, and Story of O around 1975. The images for those movies were clear and crisp, the colors vivid, and they were shown in regular movie theaters, not porno movie theaters. Porn was suddenly gaining acceptance, beyond the low-grade shit shown in home movies.
The internet gives you access to quality porn, with high production values, and attractive to beautiful models.
The Give Me Teens site is low quality porn.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Simple setup. Most of the plots are older guy gets seduced by young girls.
-The site was added to the Nubile Films around late 2019, as a bonus site.
-PU offers a discounted price of $19.94/month.
-Login and member pages are secure.
-Videos are offered in 270p through 1080p.
-Videos have a short text description of the plot.
Cons:
-Although the site was a bonus site added to Nubile Films in late 2019, it stopped updating in January 2020.
-The site follows the same plots as Jays POV.
-The visuals of the video are usually clear, with nice colors. But the videos use a POV setup, and the camera can be slightly shaky. Jay should hire a professional videographer to shoot these videos.
Bottom Line:
Site theme is horny teens who fuck their step fathers or step brothers. So this is faux incest, where you're supposed to experience the excitement of watching taboo sex. The big plus is the girls are usually good-looking teens. A minor negative is the stunt cock is usually Jay, who can get irritating after watching him get seduced time after time. That ploy gets old fast. Would like to see some different stunt cocks, for a different take on the plot.
The site only has 67 videos. So it's a very small site. And the last update was in January 2020.
If you enjoy the videos, you can find simiilar videos at Jays POV (a channel at Adult Time).
The colors of the videos are clear and crisp, but the camera work can be jittery at times. This is POV.
As a free add-on to Nubile Films, it's worth checking the site out.
Two things impress me about the site.
I'm not a fan of POV. I prefer traditional camera-work that gives you a more stable, comprehensive view of the action.
However, some of the girls are really cute. And POV can make it seem like you're watching the action right on top of the girl. It's inches away from that lovely feminine flesh. Boobs, pussy, ass.
And as many of these videos keep reminding you, it's not really sex between blood relatives. It's only sex between step-relatives. So it's not real incest, but faux incest.
Giving the site a score of 79.
The main cons are:
-It's an archive site. No updates since January 2020.
-It's a small site. Only 67 videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU shows a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring.
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 17 different sites.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading privileges for the videos and photo sets.
-The technical features of the videos and photo sets are excellent: clear, crisp images, good to excellent flesh-tones of the models, nice sets, good lighting, good focus.
-There is a photo set for each video.
-Videos and photo sets come in your choice of multiple definitions.
-Site navigation is easy.
-Multiple tags and a text description describe the plot of each scene.
-Content is exclusive.
Cons:
-The poor acting level of the models, the stupid scripts and dialogue are strong negatives that negate the technical qualities of the videos.
-The level of attractiveness of the models (both the teens and MILFs) is below average for the network.
Princess Cum, Nubiles Casting, Petite HD Porn, Petite Ballerinas Fucked, Nubiles.net, all have teen models that are far more attractive.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Advertising for competing sites and for the Nubiles Porn network take up a good part of the real estate of every member page. The good thing about the advertising for the Nubiles Porn network is that each hot link serves as a link to open that particular site.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 147
Runtimes: most videos run from 20 to 40 minutes.
All videos available in definition from 270p through 1080p.
Newer videos starting Oct 18, 2020 have a 4K option.
Photo sets have from 28 to 200 photos per set.
Site theme: Faux incest: a step-mother has sex, either with her step-daughter, or her step-son, or with her step-child and her step-child's sex partner.
So there's some old-young appeal, teen niche, milf niche, lesbian element. Because you have women in their 30s and 40s, you have a wider selection of body types beyond the slender teenagers.
The site falls into the reality porn niche, except when I watch these videos, they seem fake as hell. That's because of the poor acting abilities of the models and the stunt cocks, and the poor scripts, which are unbelievable.
=========
Edit:
I am confused about faux incest. I've read on the internet that laws regarding incest vary considerably between jurisdictions.
In many areas, legally, there is no difference between an adopted child and a biological child for incest.
To make that clear, an adopted child cannot marry the daughter or son of his adoptive parents, because the effect of the adoption order is to create a blood relationship between them.
I don't know why so many sites show fake incest (what I call fake incest, which is sex between step-relatives).
Most sites make it very clear there is no blood relation between the sex partners, but there is a step-relation between the sex partners.
So even though these are actors, not real blood relations and not real step-relatives, the sex between step-relatives would be illegal.
So what's the point of making it clear that the actors are playing step-relatives instead of blood relatives?
Since, legally, a step-relative is a blood relative?
In some jurisdictions, adopted siblings who are related by adoption only, but not by blood, can marry.
But that interpretation seems to be very limited.
=========
The main strengths of the site:
-You get access to all 17 sites of the Nubiles Porn network.
-The videos are professionally shot: Clear, crisp imagery, good lighting, nice sets, nice sound control.
-Easy site navigation.
-Easy to switch to a different site in the network.
-Relatively low membership price: $14.98/month with a PU discount.
The main cons of the site:
-The stupid plots. The poor acting.
-I don't find the models very attractive. Other sites in the network have more attractive models.
-I definitely enjoy many other sites in the network far more than I enjoy this site.
This is a personal opinion: I don't enjoy the site.
The Nubiles.net site (part of this network) is the main value of the network.
That site serves as an encyclopedia of teen porn starlets who are starting out in their careers.
There are other sites in the network that are worth viewing.
If Milf-teen incest porn is your fantasy, the site might be more pleasing for you.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network, which has 18 different sites you get access to.
-If you join the site directly, the PU listed prices are:
Monthly: $29.32 (recurring)
1 Year: $199.00 (recurring)
Instead, if you join through the Nubiles Porn site (which includes the FamilySwap.xxx site), you get a PU discounted price of:
Monthly: $19.98 (recurring)
1 Year: $99.95 (recurring)
-The content is exclusive.
-No streaming or download limits. Which is becoming rare, since many sites are either charging extra for downloads or limiting downloads.
-Because it's a tiny site (14 videos currently), site navigation is easy.
Even if the site grows, the site layout is professional, making it easy to find what you want.
Your choice of streaming definition, from 270p through 4K.
Download videos: 270p - 4K definition.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
There are matching photosets.
The photosets are real photos. Up to 158 photos per set.
You have zip files of each photoset in small, medium and large definition.
You can select how the elements of a page are displayed:
-You can link photos or thumbnails to the video
-You can auto-size the photos.
-You can set the number of thumbnails per page.
-You can set the gallery photos to small, medium or large definition.
Although normally you think of the site and network as a porn video site, the site is professionally set up as a video and photo site, with most of the same controls that you find at the MetArt and Femjoy sites.
-Not only do you get a photoset of photos, but you get a smaller photoset of screencaps of each video. The screencap photoset has around 50 screencaps.
Maybe the idea is to give you a screencap storage-saving file?
Bottom Line:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Call me spoiled. I collect MetArt galleries, MPL galleries.
Also the galleries from Wow Girls, Wow Porn, etc. sites are worth collecting.
But photos from FamilySwap.xxx are not worth collecting.
The only photosets from the Nubiles Porn network that are worth collecting are some of the Nubiles.net photosets.
CONS(START OF):
These are some of the minor cons:
-You have to know how to join to save money.
If you join directly through FamilySwap.xxx, the prices are:
$29.32/month
$199.00/year
PU has a discounted price for Nubiles Porn (which includes full access to FamilySwap.xxx):
$19.98/month
$99.95/year
But if you wait for a holiday special, you can get a yearly membership to Nubiles Porn for $84, which is what I paid.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-CCBill is the default biller. A trusted name. But I prefer FameSupport, which has a 24/7 live chat option, as well as 24/7 email and telephone support. MetArt support is also first rate, except it doesn't have live chat.
-When you log in to the site, the first page you see is an ad page for sites. That is both good and bad: bad, because you want to see the content you paid for; good, because the prices of some of these ad sites are tempting.
Major cons:
-Many of the sites in the network are archive sites, that stopped updating 1 or more years ago.
-The plots at many of the sites are stupid. And the acting is poor. Instead of thinking of the videos as "reality porn", think of them as parodies. A change of mind makes you accept the action more easily, so you can focus on how attractive many of these models are, their young, tender bodies (the site and network is teen orientated), and erase the stunt cocks from the video and put yourself in their place. It makes a more arousing picture.
-Tiny site. 14 videos currently.
-Irregular update rate: you get 2 to 5 new videos per month.
-Site started in September 2020. Based on the past history of the network, the site operators can stop updating any time soon, or keep a trickle of updates.
BOTTOM LINE:
-Stupid plots, and the poor acting, are a turn-off for me. The site theme is blended families have horny females (mainly daughters, but also their mothers or step-mothers), who are ready to fuck with little or no build-up. You see 2 women (a mother and a daughter), 2 men (a father and a son or step-son) solving a jigsaw puzzle for some quality family time. The boy is sneaking peeks at the older woman's breasts and ass. The man is sneaking peaks at the young girl's tits and ass. The young woman, out of the blue, snipes at the young man by saying he has a tiny dick. So the young man stands up, drops his pants, and shows his cock, to prove it's not tiny. The mother tells the father, "What are you laughing at, his dick is probably bigger then yours." So the father stands up, pulls his cock out, and says "Look at mine."
This is how modern mixed families behave.
This is a great example of why I think the videos should be viewed at parodies, instead of as reality porn.
Because the next thing you see, the two women are kneeling on the floor, the two guys are shoving their cocks up the women's pussies.
No romance. No build-up. No sense in what's happening, except this is a porn video, so let's get to the fucking already.
The site layout, and the network layout, are done professionally, to make using the site and network easy to use.
I wish they put more thought into making the videos more realistic. To add some build-up, some plot to make the sex more meaningful. More passionate.
Instead, you have horny young men and horny older men jumping on young and slightly older women.
What's supposed to add an element of heat is this is fake-incest, where the partners are related by marriage, but not by blood. Fake incest is a very popular niche, and there are some sites that do a good to great job with this niche. Pure Taboo is one of the finest plot-driven sites on the internet. Excellent technical production values, very good acting, if you want to watch fake incest, watch some of the Pure Taboo videos, which is a competing site. The structure/layout of FamilySwap.xxx is good to excellent, but the content is poor, because of the stupid plots and poor acting.
Except I think the producers are doing this deliberately: this is the product they want: a parody of reality porn, that is supposed to be sexy.
Except it's not sexy: it's stupid.
The site is not to my taste.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-21 Sextreme is a channel in the Adult Time network. You get access to the entire Adult Time network.
-Large channel: 4,499 videos.
-Actively updating: about 1 update per week(video + photoset).
-Download options run from 160p through 4K(Ultra High Definition) on newer videos. Older videos run from 160p through 540p.
-Very fast download speeds. I get around 20MB/s-24MB/s on average on my WiFi downloads.
-Default filename for videos is excellent: It automatically gives you the title of the episode, the female models, the file definition: for example,
SeductiveEncounter_s01_TiffanyTatum_TaraSpades_540p.mp4
-Excellent customer service. There is a live chat line, that is 24/7.
Cons:
-A lot of videos won't stream. Have to download to watch them.
-Although this is supposed to be a channel featuring taboo sex, there is very little plot, and the taboos being broken are weak. For example, a twenty-something woman wants to have sex with her french tutor, who is older than her. So this is supposed to be dark sex. Or a teen female model wants to have sex with an older woman. Another example dark sex, which, in today's porn world, is very weak taboo-breaking. I mean, in the real world, it's somewhat common for older women to have younger women as lovers.
-There seems to be a lot of hype in describing the models. For example, Alyssa Bounty is described as "a perfect beauty." You look at Alyssa Bounty, she's not ugly, but she's not a beauty: she is an average-type woman in looks. True, she has a nice slim body, but her face is just OK, nothing special. A lot of the teens you see at your local mall are more attractive than Alyssa Bounty.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
On average, the models at 21 Sextreme are far below average in looks compared to any glamour site, and below average compared to the models at Teen Mega World.
I don't know what it is, but even the cute models at the Adult Time network usually don't appear as attractive as they do at other networks: look at Evelina Darling, Foxy Di, Cherry Kiss, Angelika Grays, Anastasia Brokelyn or a bunch of other models at the Adult Time channels, and these models will usually appear to be much more attractive at competing porn sites. Maybe it's the makeup, the lighting, the photographic techniques, whatever, but unless you pick one of the glamour-type channels at Adult Time, like Vixen or Tushy, they often don't put a lot of effort into making the models as attractive as possible, even when the models have natural beauty.
-Navigation is poor. The Adult Time has a massive amount of content, both videos and photosets. And 271 channels. Trying to find the videos that belong to each channel can be a chore. There's too much content to slog through, to find the videos for each channel. They need to update the site structure, to make finding the content at each channel easier to locate, and to access.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): 21 Sextreme
Site theme: "The Darker Side Of 21 Sextury"
Videos explore the dark side of taboo sex.
Pure Taboo, a different channel on the Adult Time network, does a much better job exploring the dark side of sex: Pure Taboo is probably the finest site on the internet featuring taboo sex: fake incest, infidelity, lesbianism, etc. High production values, creative plots, some of the best acting by porn models you will find.
Summary:
I've been spoiled by the quality of the Pure Taboo channel. It's probably the finest story-driven dark erotic site on the internet.
21 Sextreme is not a bad site. It has a large amount of content (4,499 videos), the production values are professional (but they pale in comparison to the cinematic quality of the Pure Taboo videos), the 21 Sextreme videos lack the creative plot of the Pure Taboo videos.
Comparing the two channels is like comparing a glass of fine wine to a glass of tap water: Pure Taboo is outstanding quality, 21 Sextreme is a OK site that pales in comparison.
Many years ago the 21 Sextreme network (when it was a stand-alone network) used to give you access to over 20 sites covering a wide variety of niches, which were, at the time, hot and extreme. For example, it included a pee site, a zoliboy site, old-young lesbian sex, granny sex, old-man-young-girl-sex, fisting, and domination. They dropped some of the sites when the network was merged into the Adult Time network.
However, since 21 Sextreme is now a channel in the Adult Time network, a membership in 21 Sextury network also gives you access to the entire Adult Time network, which includes 271 channels and 53,182 videos, which is a massive collection of hardcore porn covering a wide variety of niches.
If you were a fan of the old 21 Sextreme network, you will probably miss some of the old content that was eliminated. However, that's the way things work in business: you often lose some content that people used to treasure, when sites merge, to increase efficiency in maintaining the current structure.
I'm giving 21 Sextreme a score of 79. The site does not impress me much, and I do not spend much time at the site. I enjoy other channels in the Adult Time network more. For a site that emphasizes taboo sex, I recommend the Pure Taboo channel, which is the finest channel for story-driven taboo sex on the internet.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
INTRODUCTION:
This review is based on the Peter North channel of the Adult Time network.
If you subscribe to the Adult Time network, you get the Peter North channel.
If subscribe directly to the Peter North site, you are supposed to get access to the Adult Time network.
One problem: sometimes, when you join a site, you don't get everything that is advertised. It happens, and it can be frustrating.
A different problem: the Adult Time channel for a site can be very different from a subscription to the original site. The Adult Time channel might be a condensed version of the original site, with fewer videos, fewer photos in a photoset, less definition options for streaming or downloading videos and photosets, and other differences.
PROS(START OF):
-Peter North is a legend in the porn industry. Famous for his stamina and cum shots.
-The Peter North channel lists 3336 videos for the Peter North channel. So there is plenty of content at the channel.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
With access the Adult Time network, you are supposed to get 8 video updates per day, which is a huge amount of updates.
-There is often a brief setup to the sex, but it's very minimal. Most of the video is straight, hardcore sucking, fucking, etc.
CONS(START OF):
-The Peter North channel (and site) stopped updating around May 2018.
Even before the updates stopped, Peter North himself was becoming less active in front of the camera.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The earliest videos start around December 2006, and are only available in 240p and 480p.
Even some videos posted in 2018 can have a max definition of 480p.
But other videos posted in 2018 can have a max definition of 1080p.
-The models are mainly white. Ages range from late teens to around 30.
A lot of the models have breast implants. Plenty of tattoos.
Older videos max out at 480p, and the technical features can be poor:
-Any glamour site has better-looking models.
Bottom Line:
These options relate to a sub to the Peter North site:
These options can change very fast. So check what the options are, before you choose your membership plan:
Streaming only - 3 Days period. $1.00 charge.
Streaming only - 30 Days period. $14.95/month.
Streaming + downloads - 30 days period. $24.95/month.
Streaming + downloads - 365 days period. $95.40/year.
-They advertise the following:
Access to over 25 sites
18,000+ Scenes
Multiple Daily Updates
Unlimited Streaming & Downloads
Peter North is part of what used to be called the Fame Digital network. Which used to be a separate network of 20+ sites.
The Fame Digital network became part of the Adult Time network in 2018. As part of the Adult Time network, you have access to over 250 channels, over 52,000 videos, and 8 updates daily.
I don't know why they advertise that when you join Peter North, you get access to 18,000+ scenes:
You are supposed to get access to the Adult Time network, which has over 52,000 videos.
Maybe it's a case of copywriters covering a single niche, without knowing what the overall picture: the overall picture is that when you join Peter North, you are supposed to get access to the entire Adult Time network, not just access to the old network that Peter North was part of.
I get access to the Adult Time network because I joined through 21 Sextury.
21 Sextury is a network that used to include over 20 separate sites.
But in 1998, 21 Sextury was folded into the Adult Time network.
Late in 1998, joining 21 Sextury sometimes gave you access to the Adult Time network (on a random basis).
Then, early 1999, joining 21 Sextury gave everyone access to the Adult Time network.
(That was the theory, and what was advertised. But one PU member who joined 21 Sextury back then, and saw it advertised that he would get access to Adult Time, did not get access to Adult Time. This was one of those times when a network promised something, and did not follow through with its promise.)
But this is now October 2020, and I assume that almost all members who join a site that advertises access to Adult Time get access.
The main point is: Access to the Adult Time network is usually the main value of joining any sub-network in the Adult Time network.
I'm giving the Peter North channel a score of 79.
The main advantage of the Peter North channel is that it gives you access to the Adult Time network, which has a huge catalog of very good hardcore videos that cover a wide range of niches.
Note: I reviewed the Peter North channel in 04-17-19 and gave it a score of 95.
The high score was because I was really rating the Adult Time network access, which I thought was one of the best bargains in porn.
Today's review focuses more on the Peter North channel, which is one of the poorer choices in the Adult Time network.
That's why my score dropped so dramatically.
Also, I was just getting used to the Adult Time network, and was impressed.
Since then, I am still impressed by the Adult Time network, but would drop my score for the Adult Time network to maybe 90+.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They are running a current special of $9.95 for the first month, recurring at $29.95/month.
But the special one year price is $60, which is very low.
-Vendo is the default biller. Not as well known as CCBill or Epoch, but I've had many subs through Vendo, and never had a problem.
-Login and member pages are secure (https). So ISP does not keep a record of each member page you visit
-No streaming or download limits that I can find.
-You get confirming emails on signup, with your login details, subscription id, order details (price and duration of membership), credit card used, etc.
-Most videos are available in 320p through 4K definition.
-Videos have a runtime of 20 to 30 minutes.
-Photosets are available in zip files in 2 definitions: low and high.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-User name and password are computer generated, so have to write them down. But they are in the confirming emails, so can copy and paste into login page.
-The site has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, but the thumbnails are usually poor photos of the models: a home photographer could easily take photos that would make the models more attractive.
You look at the thumbnails of the models, and realize that the girls in any mall would look much better than what these models look like. How you photograph a model can make a huge difference in how attractive she appears.
I look through the thumbnails of the models, and I find some models I'm familiar with, such as Delphine, who is a very attractive blonde model, and at this site (at least, in the thumbnail), she is not attractive. Nika O, another attractive model, looks poor.
If a site does not have attractive female models, I usually have little interest in the site.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Even the models I know can be very attractive, at this site thumbnails, are not attractive.
-The online photoplayer is slow.
-The quality of the photos varies. From poor to OK.
-I've seen many screen caps at competing sites that were far better quality than the photos at this site: two problems with the photos at this site: the models are not made up to be attractive. The second problem is the quality of the photos: they are just poor photos. Even models that I've seen can be very attractive at other sites, at this site, they are not attractive. The colors of the photo are poor. The model looks poor. The photosets are a waste of time.
I look at the photos of Nika O, an attractive teen. I know it's her, because I've seen her at other sites. And I've seen her at other sites with the same name. But at this site, in the photos, she looks like poor. At MetArt, Nubiles, ShowyBeauty, she is an attractive young teen. Sexy. Erotic. An object of desire.
At Wet and Puffy, she is a piece of meat I would not look at twice.
Am I over-reacting? I don't think so.
Porn is fantasy.
But if the image of the model is so unappealing, the value of the porn is damaged.
There was a recent poll at PU that asked: "Do you feel high-quality photos are an important part of a site's content?"
Well, the photos at Wet and Puffy are not high-quality photos. They are low-quality photos, that degrade the value of the models, that degrade the value of the site.
Sites like X-Art, the Wow sites have good to excellent photosets, that display the attractiveness of their models.
The Teen Mega World network has improved the quality of their photos over the years, to the point where the photos can present attractive young teens and contribute to the quality of the network.
The photos at Wet and Puffy are poor photos, that degrade the value of the site.
Even when they do have models that are naturally attractive, those models are presented as un-attractive females.
Holly, another attractive model, has 1 video at Wet And Puffy. An attractive model, pretty face, voluptious body, but the video is hurt by the skin tones of the model. She's just not attractive.
At Wow Girls, where she's listed as Barbie, she looks great. At Wet And Puffy, because of the poor skin tones, she looks blah. Not pretty or attractive.
The lighting and other factors can add or detract from the value of a video, and at Wet And Puffy, the photos and videos are poor. Even when they take a pretty model, she will look poor or unattractive in her photos and videos at Wet And Puffy.
BOTTOM LINE(Start of):
Site theme: The site classifies a woman's pussy into one of three types:
puffy peach, juicy cherry or big taco.
So the site focuses on pussies and toys.
Whatever it takes to get a woman off.
(Except no men are allowed.)
So you get all kinds of masturbation with toys.
-You get access to 6 sites with a membership.
wetandpuffy
weliketosuck
wetandpissy
puffynetwork
simplyanal
eurobabefacials
There is also a live cam show at the network.
Porn is fantasy.
One of the main factors I look at is how attractive the models are.
The models at Wet and Puffy are not presented attractively.
That is a major negative factor, for me, at least.
So, in spite of the current special price of $60 for one year, I would not join this site.
That is a personal judgment.
Other PU members have found the site to have value.
Homegirl gave the site a score of 90.
mbaya gave the site a score of 95.
tangub gave the site a score of 84.
It's a large site.
Over 900 videos.
Over 900 photo sets.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to the entire network on joining.
-Seventeen series included with your Nubiles Porn membership
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Login and member pages are https secure.
-PU has a discounted price of $14.98/month recurring.
-Photosets are nice-sized, average about 120-138 photos per set.
-PU and TBP have an error in the yearly membership. A yearly membership is $99.95/recurring.
PU and TBP show a yearly membership is $199.00/recurring.
PU and TBP show a yearly membership is $99.95/non-recurring.
-Billers are CCBill and Epoch, both trusted names, easy to deal with, easy to cancel.
-Videos can be streamed or downloade in 270p through 1080p.
-Photosets are nice-sized, average about 120-138 photos per set.
Cons:
-The photosets are basically a wasted opportunity of attractive models. Little effort is put into making the models as attractive as possible. The lighting is good, the sets(background) are good, but they are not trying to make an erotic photo record of a sex shoot. The models are not posed in sexy positions, it's just a record of a sex scene, without trying for an erotic atmosphere.
The models are attractive, but the photosets don't really take advantage of the models' physical looks.
And the site has a lot of top grade models: Jillian Janson, Mia Malkova, Megan Rain, Maddy Rose, Piper Perri, and those are just the 5 models in the earliest posted videos.
-Slow, irregular update rate: 1 to 4 videos per month.
Site started in 2015, that's over 4 years ago, and it only has 123 videos
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 123
Video runtime: 30 minutes or less.
Photosets: average 118-136 photos per set.
The site is classified as reality porn. Which means that the porn is supposed to be a slice of life.
Except that's a stretch: because the site porn is fantasy, featuring fake incest where step children have sex with each other or sometimes with their step parents. And the acting of the models makes it seem even more fake and not realistic. But that's one of the problems of much of mainstream porn: the models are not chosen for their acting ability, but for their willingness to strip for the camera and to be filmed in sexual situations.
If you've watched a lot of porn behind-the-scene videos, you realize that porn is a business, and the models are paid performers putting on a show. Which takes away a lot of the heat and passion these scenes can sometimes generate.
However, watching porn can be a learning experience.
Especially with a site like Step Siblings Caught, which can give helpful hints on how to be a successful person.
There's a video titled "Quarantined With My Step Sis" with Avery Cristy. She's a cute blonde model who's quarantined with her step-brother in an apartment. She wears a mask for health reasons because of the coronavirus epidemic, and she is cleaning their apartment.
Then Avery and her step-brother sit on the couch, because they are bored and restless, and they start to make out. I guess that being quarantined because of the virus has made them not just bored but also horny.
They move to the bedroom and the bed, and start going all out.
Watching this video, I learned there can be good things to relieve your boredom if you have a step-sister stuck in the same apartment you are in. You can increase the family closeness, and have a good time doing it.
Sex is the glue that keeps us together.
And if you can't go out because of the quarantine rules, sex is the best way to not only relieve the boredom, but it also helps to make a family healthy and close.
Bottom line:
The pros for the site include:
-A lot of pretty models.
-Site membership is part of the Nubiles-porn network, which includes 17 sites you get access to.
-The navigation is simple and easy.
The cons include:
-The plots for the site are stupid. Which takes away from the value of the videos.
-The models, although attractive to very attractive, are not good actors: that, combined with the silly plots, detract from the impact of the videos.
So even though some of the girls are very pretty, the stupid plots and poor acting can make for boring videos, and the site suffers. It's much better to watch an excellent photo site with great photography than to watch stupid videos of beautiful women.
I'm giving the site a score of 79, in spite of the fact that you get access to nubiles.net, which is a great site filled with photosets and videos of cute to lovely women. Nubiles.net by itself deserves a score in the high 90s. But Step Siblings Caught, in spite of the pretty models, because it's a small site, and because the plots are silly, and the models can't act, and the videos are boring and unbelievable, is a poor site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the 18videoz network. You get access to 9 sites.
-There is a short plot to the videos. A guy runs across an attractive girl, they go to an apartment, and they quickly have sex. Not much plot, not much foreplay. So you don't have to wait to get to the good stuff (if you are the impatient porn user).
-Limited lifetime membership. Even when your membership expires, you still have a free limited access to the network. You can see all picture sets, some videos, and a preview of all the latest updates.
If your membership expired and your login stops working, contact support for help.
(The Gamma networks have a similar lifetime membership system, where expired memberships are a limited lifetime membership.)
-Very welcoming site. When you login, you see a message: "Hi there, YourMemberName."
So if you're feeling lonely, log in to the site, and you will be with friends.
-You can select your favorite videos, picture sets, and models.
-The network started offering 4K videos in late 2016.
Cons:
-Security is poor for the site and the network.
In the sign up process, you enter your email address on a non-secure page.
When you non-secure login to the members area (your browser warns you that your login details are not secure.)
-You're username and password are computer-generated, so need to write it down and enter it each time you login to the site. And your friendly browser tells you on each login that you are using a non-secure login.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-The file sizes are huge. A 1080p video file with a runtime of 27 minutes is 2.36 GB.
I've never seen a 1080p video of 27 minute runtime anywhere near this large. What codec are they using?
-Since my download speeds are less than 2 Mbps, downloading a video at 1080p can easily take 20 minutes or more.
-When streaming a video, the video shudders when playing. My WiFi download speeds are between 17-90 Mbps, and that is more than enough to stream 1080p videos.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Thumbnails at the top and middle of the member pages are actually ads, which you don't realize until you click on them and open a new browser window that allows you to join that site.
I paid for a membership, show me what I paid for, not a bunch of scenes that turn out to be ads for other sites.
-The models are probably Russian. They speak in Russian, with no subtitles. But who needs subtitles? You can figure the plot is a boy picking up a girl and taking her to an apartment and then a blow job and fucking, what they say is hardly the most important part of the scene.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Casual Teen Sex stats:
movies (379)
Models (2235)
Photosets (2426)
So this is a fairly large site.
The site was launched in early 2009, so it's been around a long time.
The update rate is very slow.
I've grown accustomed to high quality photos and videos from most porn sites.
So the Casual Teen Sex videos and photo sets are disappointing. The sets seem cheap. The models are nice-enough looking, but very little care is taken to make them attractive.
The early videos at the site were cheaply made: cheap sets, poor recording equipment, poor lighting, cheap street clothes. The same type of cheaply produced porn that Teen Mega World started off with many years ago. But the Teen Mega World network has made huge strides in improving the technical factors of their videos, along with upgrading their sets and costumes and everything else.
With Casual Teen Sex site, the site has made some effort to improve the quality of the videos, but nowhere near the improvement that TMW (Teen Mega World) has done. So the overall impression is that the Casual Teen Sex videos are still cheaply made, just not as cheap as they were years ago.
The videos seem like an amateur video of a guy picking up a girl on a street, taking her to his apartment, and having sex without much prelimiaries. Which expresses the casual teen sex vibe.
But I still prefer the more polished videos at sites like Wow Girls, or even the Teen Mega World sites.
I'm giving the Casual Teen Sex site a score of 79. That is very subjective.
The site, as part of the 18videoz network gives you access to about 9 hardcore teen sites.
That means thousands of teen models. Many of them attractive, although not much effort is put into making them attractive. But they are young and naturally attractive.
The best way to enjoy these videos is to think of yourself as a fly in the air or on the wall (if inside an apartment) who is watching two or more people having sex, without a lot of meaning behind it.
And ignore most thumbnails of hot girls that litter each page: because they are just hot links to open a new page to join some other site.
I would recommend spending your money on a different site, where the videos (and photos) are more impressive.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nuru Massage is part of the Adult Time network. You get access to over 50,000 premium hardcore videos at the Adult Time network.
-I don't have good information on the pricing of the different memberships to either Adult Time or Nuru Massage, because I'm a current member of Adult Time, so if I click on a hot link of an offer to join Adult Time, I go directly to the Adult Time membership pages, bypassing the posted prices to join.
-PU shows a discounted price of $9.95 for the first month of Adult Time, though whether that includes downloading is not shown. The price jumps to $29.95 after the first month.
Adult Time also runs special prices on ads of $5.00 for the first month, or $9.95 for the first month, for streaming only access.
-PU shows a discounted price of $14.95 for the first month for a direct subscription to Nuru Massage (which includes access to the Adult Time network), recurring at $29.95/month. I assume that would include downloading.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Nuru Massage is a large channel on Adult Time, with 635 videos listed for a search of "Nuru Massage".
CONS(START OF):
-The navigation can be clunky at times. They are updating/changing the network structure.
A while ago, it was easier to select a channel, and see clearly the number of videos at the channel, and to find a listing of the channel videos in chronological order. That seems to have vanished, in the currrent structure, at least for channels with a large number of videos.
I open the Adult Time channel member page, select the "channels" hot link, type in Nuru Massage in the search box, hit my Enter key, and it brings up:
'Search results for "nuru massage"'
Videos
-Thumbnails for a few videos, that I assume are from the Nuru Massage channel;
Pornstars
-Thumbnails for a few porn stars, that I assume are featured in Nuru Massage videos;
Channels
-View all channels hot link, which I assume will bring up a listing (partial) of all channels for Adult Time network.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Movies
-View all movies;
And other thumb nails/hot links to other channels in the Adult Time network.
They previously had a tremendous amount of content, but it was easier to navigate, with less steps to find specific channels, to find the content at each channel.
But they are fucking up the Adult Time network, because the site programmers don't bother to keep the navigation simple: instead, they are adding channels, and making the network a jumbled mess.
So instead of adding value to the network, by adding more content and more channels, they are making the network harder to use, which decreases the value of the network, by making it harder to find the content of each channel.
Formerly, it was easy for me to go to some of my favorite channels (such as Pure Taboo), and examine the content at the channel, either by chronological listing, or by porn star.
But now I have a hard time reviewing Nuru Massage, because I can't easily find a simple listing of the channel's contents.
And this review is messed up, because I'm trying to focus on the Nuru Massage channel, but the Adult Time network navigation problems keep getting in the way of a simple review of Nuru Massage.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
With 635 videos at the Nuru Massage channel, there are a huge amount of porn stars in these videos.
Many are A-list stars.
Heather Starlet, Elsa Jean, Kyler Quinn, Dakota Skye, Kenna James, the list goes on and on.
They try to add a plot to the Nuru Massage videos.
The plot is usually a short lead-in the the massage and sex.
The plot, as is usual for most porn videos, is fairly stupid and unbelievable.
And the acting skills of the porn models is rudimentary.
So why bother with a plot?
It shows the producers are trying to make the sex video more interesting or worthwhile than just a straight hardcore porn video showing two or more bodies slapping against each other.
But some sites do or a much better job, with the plot element actually adding value to the sex.
Pure Taboo is a channel that features twisted plots, great production values, some really interesting videos that can be very erotic.
The Porn Fidelity and Teen Fidelity sites can also have interesting plots, great production values, and very erotic videos.
The Nuru Massage videos feature stupid plots, that you have to be really drunk to believe, or are better ignored.
Some of the models are very attractive, so that can make the videos worth watching.
If you're watching these videos with a partner, it's an excellent reason to get drunk, because that would be a great lead-in to having real-life personal sex while watching these videos.
Kenna James has a Nuru Massage video. The plot is stupid, the acting is poor, but Kenna James is fucking attractive.
So if you can ignore the stupid plot and poor acting, you can watch Kenna James seduce her stepfather: all in the interests of bringing her family closer together.
Bottom line:
Since the plots are so silly, and the acting is amateurish, I much prefer other sites that feature massage-themed sex. The Tricky Masseur site at Teen Mega World is one of my favorites.
The same videos at Tricky Masseur are also featured at the Diesel network (All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network), at 18 Virgin Sex, and probably at other sites, as well. In those videos, the plot is simpler: a girl walks into a room for a massage, she undresses, the masseur rubs her down, she becomes aroused, and they have sex.
The simpler plot is easier to act, and more believable.
And the girls in those videos are mainly attractive.
And the sex can be hot.
Which is why I much prefer those simple massage videos over the nuru massage videos.
The Dane Jones massage videos also keep the plot simpler, which is much easier to act, easier to accept, than the Nuru Massage videos.
Since I don't appreciate the Nuru Massage videos, I'm giving the channel a score of 79.
But if you include access to the rest of the Adult Time network, the score would jump to the 90s or more.
SEE THE FIRST REPLY TO THIS REVIEW FOR A SAMPLE DESCRIPTION OF A NURU MASSAGE VIDEO.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
