Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network of 16 sites. Access to any one of the sites gives you access to all the sites in the network.
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month recurring.
-I've seen a current discounted sale membership of $84/year. But with the virus epidemic, affecting porn production, I don't know if an annual membership will have the normal update rate. Because many porn production sites have either shut down or reduced output.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading. Which is nice, because many porn sites are starting to charge extra for downloading, or limiting your downloads by the day or month.
-CCBill and Epoch are the main billers, both trusted names. Easy to cancel, usually easy to deal with for a billing problem (except if you get scammed by a pre-checked cross-sale, that is hard to fight).
-Login and member pages are https. Which is nice, because it's less prone to hacking. And your ISP does not keep a record of each page you visit.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-The main strength of the site and network is the models are cute young girls.
-Content is exclusive.
-Easy navigation. This is the way sites should be laid out, where it's easy to search the site's content and access the content. Something the Adult Time network needs to learn, because the Adult Time network is a huge, jumbled mess of some good and not-so-good porn.
CONS(START OF):
-The major con is this is a tiny site. 14 videos + matching photosets.
-A second major con is this is an archivie site. Last update was 2018-10-18.
So the site is tiny, and will not grow.
-So if you are stuck at home, in the stay-at-home order, you can scan and/or download the entire site in less than a day. However, you have the rest of the network to explore, which has a huge number of cute teens in hardcore (and some softcore) scenes and photos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
Bottom Line:
Site description (from the site):
When Daddy's Little Angel isn't ready to give up her virginity, he convinces her to let him cum through the backdoor. These taboo teens will do anything to impress their stepdads, even if it means getting their asses stretched with first time anal sex. Watch petite angels earn their wings with hardcore anal and double penetration scenes.
Growing up, I thought that Daddys Lil Angel was the best treat for Daddy. But this site seems to think that anal sex is the way to a Daddys heart and mind. Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
The main site in the network is Nubiles.net. This is the jewel of the network, with it's massive collection of young porn stars. Many of the models make an early appearance in their career at Nubiles.net, which is like an encyclopedia of teen porn.
Nubiles Porn network includes:
Mainly teen sites, with a variety of niches: fake stepfamily taboo incest (I assume that showing "real" incest is against the law, or else why are there so many sites that show fake incest and constantly advertise that there is no real blood relation between the models?
Also features MILFs, lesbian, anal sex, etc.
One of the main benefits of watching porn is that it's a learning experience.
You learn how the real world operates.
It also serves to relieve stress.
For example, when you watch the videos at Daddys Lil Angel, you realize that young teens want to be good girls. But they also want to please their daddys.
These are step-daddys, not biological daddys. So it's taboo, but fake taboo. However, since the tender young teen is having sex with her step-father, there is also an element of young-old.
Many of the step-fathers shown at this site seem too young to have step-daughters this old.
But a younger step-father means a guy who has more energy and stamina to satisfy their step-daughters when they start to get it on.
And they do get it on.
Either the step-father is attracted to his lovely step-daughter, or the step-daughter is attracted to her step-father.
And it's the role of the step-father to instruct his daughter in the mysteries of sex.
Because these girls need a sex educational.
Although, to be truthful, many of the girls already seem to have a good idea of how to satisfy a man:
giving a blowjob, licking his cock and balls, having vaginal and anal sex, whatever it takes.
So the girls squeal and moan, and the step-father and step-daughter end up in each other's arms, totally satisfied after a strong sexual workout.
Although the site emphasizes anal sex, the sex formula is mainly a blowjob, then vaginal and then anal sex.
I guess that anal sex is supposed to be more of a taboo than vaginal sex, but all the videos have a blowjob, vaginal and anal sex. Very little of the man going down on the female.
The videos run about 20 to 30 minutes. The videos are clear and crisp, good focus, good camera-work, good lighting, good sound control, good production values.
This is middle of the road porn: not overly harsh or over-the-top. No slapping, hitting, spitting.
Video runtime is around 25 to 30 minutes.
Photosets go up to 180 photos per set.
Videos can be downloaded or streamed in 270p through 1080p.
The streaming player is good: the videos stream smoothly, not stuttering or buffering, no pixellation.
Daddys Lil Girl is plot-driven reality porn. Except the plot is paper thin: and the reality is bullshit. But this is porn, and you shouldn't expect a lot of reality in porn. Porn is basically fantasy.
There can be excellent porn: I think Pure Taboo is an excellent plot-driven porn site, that features strong plots with attractive models (attractive models are always an important element of any porn I might enjoy), and the plots are dark and twisted, with the twisted desires adding to the impact of the porn.
That is not the case with Daddys Lil Darling. The plots are paper-thin, the acting is poor, and the sex is by-the-book scripted, so it's not creative or intense.
The site gets a score of 72.
The pros:
Nice clean videos.
Models are just OK to attractive.
The main value is you get network access to the Nubiles Porn network. If this was a stand-alone site, the score would drop to the 50s.
The cons:
Tiny site. 14 videos.
Archive site. Last update was in 2018.
A listing of the 16 sites included in the Nubiles Porn network is shown in the first reply to this review.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the X Empire network.
You get access to 5 sites with your membership.
All Black X, Dark X, Erotica X, Hard X, Lesbian X.
-Login and member pages are secure (https).
-You can choose your login details, so easily remembered username and password.
-The site and network is easy to navigate.
-The extra-large thumbnails illustrating the videos at the site are clear and crisp, giving you a fine idea of what the model and the stunt cock look like.
-The large thumbnails are actually gifs: hold your mouse over a thumbnail, and you get a very brief action-view of the model, watch her breasts flop around, her ass jiggle as she gets pounded by a black cock. The downside is I'm into young teens with slender bodies, and the models here are mainly 20-30 year old models with normal-sized bodies that look more like porn stars instead of attractive young girls. Fans of the site call the models beautiful, but this is not my idea of beauty.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
Even models that I think are pretty are presented as sluts at this site.
-Note: I am referring to the models at the Dark X site. The models at the other network sites are presented as attractive young women.
-All content is exclusive.
-Live chat is fast to respond, less than 2 minutes wait time.
-All videos stream and download from 288p through 1080p. The newest videos have a 4K option.
CONS(START OF):
-Sometimes have to pass through an ad-filled page to get to the members area.
-Every members page has ads, but ads are easily ignored.
-I'm being picky, but I think the prices for the sites in the ads are too high.
-The Best Porn states there is a daily download limit of 300GB. Which seems like a minor con to me. Who downloads 300GB in a day?
-The major con for me is I don't appreciate the style or approach of the videos. I enjoy the videos at the Wow network, Teen Mega World, X-Art.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
But at this site, the idea is you're looking at young women who want to fuck with a Black man, because it's somehow forbidden (even though it's perfectly legal today for whites and blacks to have sex). Sucking a black dick. Having a black cock up a white girl's ass. I don't buy this fantasy.
-Irregular update rate. Anywhere from 1 to 5 new videos per month.
-You can easily request a copy of your live chat. Except I did request a copy, the site stated a chat copy was sent to my email address, and I never got it (I checked inbox and spam box and never got a copy).
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
-Site has 244 videos.
-Video runtime is 20 to 40 minutes.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in the following definitions: 360p through 4K.
Note: I joined for $5 for 30 days, so I didn't have downloading privileges.
Even when my membership renewed at $19.95/month, I didn't have download privileges. That would cost about $10/month more.
I do have unlimited streaming.
-Site features inter-racial porn, where black men fuck white women.
I'm over 70, so I can recall where, mainly in the Southern United States, racial segregation was practiced: separate drinking fountains for white and black, blacks not allowed to use white-only restrooms, or to eat inside white-only restaurants.
I grew up in California, in Los Angeles county, so segregation was not so obviously practiced. But I remember we only had 1 black kid in our high school. No laws preventing him from using any facility a white person would use, but you might argue that 1 black kid in a public school population of around 300 was practical segregation.
Black men having sex with white women is a popular niche. I guess it's based on the old taboo prohibiting black men from having sex with white women.
So it can be shocking or add an element of lust for interracial sex.
(I don't know why we don't have lots of sites where white men fuck Asian women, since there was a lot of racial discrimination against Asians.)
I was roommates with a Chinese guy in the 1970s.
I was roommates with a Black guy in the 1970s.
Both of them had sex with white women.
It was nothing explosive or scandalous.
It was just normal sex.
So I don't buy into the fantasy that a white woman having sex with a black man is evil. Blacked.com and blackedraw.com are more my style, because they take attractive young women, make them even more attractive, and pair them with one or more black guys. But the tone is very different from the Dark X site.
Porn is fantasy. A lot of times, you need to shut down your brain to enjoy the show.
Except that I want good-looking teens, not porn stars looking like sluts.
I have nothing against black stunt cocks. But it just seems stupid to me that a white woman touching a black man's cock is ready to explode with lust.
Which is the fantasy that the Dark X site is promoting.
I'm giving the Dark X site a score of 78.
Blacked has the following advantages over Dark X:
The production values are much higher.
The models are presented much more attractively.
The update rate is much faster.
Blacked is a high-class act. Dark X falls short.
I would definitely choose Blacked over Dark X.
Many thanks for the prompt and detailed reply.
I should be on a limited porn budget, and constantly go over my spending limits.
So I doubt I would ever join the Team Skeet premium unlimited plan.
Also, it just makes sense to me if I join a site, I expect to get bonus sites thrown in.
Though I do join single sites (Metart, Nubile Films, etc.) that are stand-alone sites, if the content is superior.
Is this part of the basic Team Skeet network, or a premium site that you have to pay extra for, and you are paying for only access to this one site?
Second question:
Does the site use fake incest, where the father-daughter relationship is stepfather-stepdaughter, instead of "real incest", where the relationship is supposed to be father-biological-daughter?
Almost all the sites I've seen use the fake incest theme.
I don't know why. Maybe "real incest" is borderline illegal, or maybe it's illegal in some areas, and that's why the fake incest is more common.
I don't know of any site that uses the "real incest" theme.
But there are plenty of sites that use the "fake incest" theme.
Fake incest, as far as I am concerned, is where the sex is between step- relations.
I'm not talking about "real incest", which I assume is illegal.
But actors in porn who are supposedly playing "real incest" roles.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month (recurring).
-Part of the Nubiles Porn network. You get access to 18 different sites.
-The site and the network are first class. First class in videos and photosets in technical features.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-All content is exclusive.
-Navigation is simple. Can easily change between sites. No additional re-login required.
-There are free cam shows included.
-Excellent model listing, with large thumbnail for each model.
-No download or streaming limits that I found.
-There is a simple search and an advance search. The advanced search has lots of different filters you can use.
-The quality of the photosets is excellent.
-Photosets have plenty of tags to describe the action.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded in multiple definitions: 270p - 1080p.
-Photosets can be downloaded in small, medium and large definition zips (800px, 1333px, 3840px).
-This is a teen site and teen network. The models are A-list, very attractive.
Cons:
-The major con is this is a small site (19 videos and matching photosets). And it's an archive site. The last update was Apr 26, 2020. I guess the Covid epidemic shut down production.
That is a shame, because the videos and photosets are high quality, with attractive teen models.
-You get basic model information: girl's age, height, country, figure (e.g., 30B-24-33), and a fake bio that bullshit. For example, the bio for Vanna Bardot reads: "Vanna Bardot is a playful teen who loves toys, boys, and anything else that'll make her tight little pussy throb. Her puffy nipples are a perfect mouthful and her braces-filled smile is the epitome of innocence. You will love this tanned toned hottie!"
The bio is obviously fake: Vanna Bardot does not have braces. I don't know where they get the idea of innocence from, because in every video I've seen at the site and network, she's hot to trot.
My guess is they make up the bios without examining any of the site videos.
-No 4K video definition.
Bottom Line:
The site theme is teen girls who are being punished by being sent to a detention center.
That's the idea, but the videos and photosets only show a slight hint that the girls are at a detention center. They might sometimes wear an orange outfit, but that's about it. But the girls also wear tiny cut-off jeans, with g-string underwear, crop-top halters, for variety.
The holding cell for a girl is a large-sized bedroom, with a king-sized bed and the bedroom looks more like a nice motel room than a prison cell. You see framed photographs on the walls, nice nightstands with table lamps on either side of the bed, carpeted floors, an adjoining, individual bathroom with a toilet, large mirror, washbasin, and shower. Instead of bars, you have a doorway leading out of the bedroom that is not locked.
I guess the girls are supposed to be at high-class detention centers.
The only way to tell this is supposed to be a detention center is the site title, and the orange uniform some of the girls put on some of the time.
Some of the girls even have a pink teddy bear on their bed.
The sex is guy/girl, girl/girl, group with two or more girls, group with two or more girls with a guy, whatever.
The guards don't wear prison type clothes, but regular street clothes.
How do you know they are guards?
Because they tell the girls the girls are being bad. The girls are so horny they want to fuck. And the guards are willing to fuck the girls, after the girls plead to be fucked.
Or else, the girls try to get satisfaction with other girls (lesbian action).
In other words, the plots are basic or non-existent. "I'm horny, fuck me," says an attractive girl.
"No, don't be stupid," says the guard. "Please, I want you," says the girl.
"Well, all right," says the guard.
And they have sex.
Before the girl has sex with the guard, she might have sex with her pink teddy bear (to show you how horny she is).
Neither the script or the model has been nomimated for an academy award, or even for a Porn Star award, as far as I can tell.
I'm giving the site a score of 72.
The girls are attractive, the videos and photosets are good to excellent quality, the technical features of the site are fine. The problem is this is a small archive site with limited content.
However, you get access to the rest of the Nubiles Porn network, which is 18 teen sites in all. The technical features of the network are excellent. But problem with the network is that the themes are "reality-based porn" that is so simple it's stupid. Instead of calling this "reality porn", I would say it's really a 12-year-old male's fantasy of what porn girls are like: attractive young girls who just want to have sex. There is no extreme, hardcore porn action, no domination or BDSM, just clean sex with horny young girls who want to be satisfied.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Devils Film used to be part of a large network of porn sites. But for the last few years, it was merged into Adult Time, an even bigger network of porn sites. Adult Time has over 55,000 hardcore videos, probably over 50,000 photosets based on those videos.
So you get full access to the Adult Time network with a Devils Film membership, and vice versa.
-Devils Film is for hardcore porn aficionados. You will find anal, threesomes, gangbang, and with other sites that are/were part of the Devils Film network, you can explore lots of other sex niches (trans, faux incest, inter-racial, etc.).
-What's amazing is that the site is still updating. You currently have 6630 videos that are part of the Devils Film site/channel. And more are coming. You could easily spend months watching just the videos at this one channel alone, not counting the 55,000+ other hardcore videos at Adult Time. That is an embarrassment of riches.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-As part of the Adult Time network, the site layout gives you the premium features of most porn sites: multiple definitions for streaming. If your membership inludes downloads, you get multiple definitions for downloads.
-You can watch the full video, or a trailer for the video.
-Streaming and downloads definition for most videos are 160p through 1080p.
-There is a nice, short text summary of the video. Plus plenty of tags that describe the action.
CONS(START OF):
-The site is pure hardcore. Sometimes you want a break from hardcore and want some softcore. Or something slightly more artistic.
-Most PU members want download privileges. Download privileges are normally not included with a monthly membership. Exotics4me writes that if you contact customer service, they might offer you downloading privileges with a monthly sub, and with a discounted rate.
-Because the site and network has such a huge amount of content, navigation can be difficult.
Bottom Line:
CONS-CONTINUED:
-Devils Film never concentrated on finding attractive models. If all you want in a sex video is bodies slapping together, without requiring the models to be good looking, the site gives you plenty of content in many different niches. However, I like the models to be cute or pretty, which limits the videos I enjoy at the site.
-4K videos are in the minority.
BOTTOM LINE-START OF:
-Maybe it's just me, but I find watching these videos to be a low-rent experience. Even when the videos are professionally shot with good to excellent technical qualities: nice sets, good focus, good lighting, good sound control, etc., watching these videos makes me feel I'm watching a crude porn video: unattractive stunt cocks, unattractive models, un-appealing sex, why-the-fuck-am-I wasting-my-time watching shit porn. It's not shit porn, it just seems like shit porn to me. This stuff is garbage, that I don't want to watch. Give me something prettier. Or more interesting. Or whatever. But not this shit.
I can find plenty to watch at Rocco Siffredi. Or Teen Mega World. Or the Wow sites. Or Let's Doe It or other networks. But most of the content at Devils Film is, for me, junk.
It's psychology. Even when I find a video that I should enjoy, because the models are cute, the plot is OK to good, I don't enjoy it, because I'm turned off by the junk videos I've just looked at prior to finding the good video.
For example:
"Seducing My Straight White Best Friend #02", with Coco Lovelock & Michelle Anderson, posted 2022-02-13.
Coco Lovelock is a cute white girl around 22 years old.
Michelle Anderson is a cute black girl around 20 years old.
They are playing students in an empty classroom, who have sex with each other.
Nice lesbian scene, that could be placed in many lesbian sites.
Do I enjoy watching it?
No.
Why?
I'm so turned off by the shit I've already seen at Devils Film, I can't enjoy watching this video, which should be enjoyable, but I can't enjoy it.
That's me. If I have to watch or slog through too many videos that I don't enjoy, I won't find pleasure even when I come across a video that I should normally like.
So I'm giving Devils Film a score of 85.
It's part of Adult Time, which normally would give a site a score in the 90s, because of access to the Adult Time network.
But I really dislike most of the content at Devils Film.
It's not to my taste.
Though some PU members might enjoy the content, and think the site is a fine addition to the Adult Time network.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get a large number of videos in the Devils Film channel. I see 6,379 posted. A few days ago the posted number was 2,197 videos. My guess is they dumped a large number of older videos from other channels or sites into the Devils Film channel, just to increase the number posted.
-Video download and streaming options for the last few years are 160p through 4K. The older videos go up to 720p or 1080p.
-Secure login and member pages (https).
-Excellent customer support from famesupport, which is 24/7 for live chat, telephone, and email.
-Videos have both a trailer and full scene option.
-Many videos have an accompanying photoset.
-There is a text description of the video that summarizes the action.
-There are different options for membership. The membership with streaming only is cheaper. Download privileges cost extra, or are included with a yearly membership.
-Available with Chromecast and Roku.
Cons:
-Navigation is jumbled. Hard to find all the content at the channel, both to see what's there, and to access it.
-There is a zip file for the photosets, but it's only in one definition.
-The zip file for the photoset has a generic file name: e.g., 118203.zip.
So you have to rename the file to include model names, channel, date posted, scene title.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line:
-Devils Film used to be part of the Fame Digital network, which included Peter North, Silvia Saint, and a bunch of other less well-known sites. But it's now part of the Adult Time network, which means you have access to over 55,000 hardcore videos, hundreds of channels covering a wide variety of niches, and 13,406 models.
-That is both good and bad:
Good-you now have access to a boatload of new hardcore content.
Bad-navigation is nowhere as easy as it used to be, when Devils Film was treated as a separate site.
They advertise that Devils Film channel at Adult Time has 6,379 videos. A few days earlier the posted number was 2,197 videos. I'm guessing they dumped a lot of older videos into the Devils Film channel from other sites.
Searching for the Devils Film videos at Adult Time is a chore, and you need computer skills to filter out all the extraneous content from the other sites at Adult Time to find what used to be much easier to locate and access.
The Adult Time thumbnails are larger than the old Devils Films thumbnails, so you can more easily see what the models look like. And the newer thumbnails are more attractive.
Under the old Devils Film, your membership price was lower, and you could often find very nice bargains. You pay more for a Devils Film membership today, but you get access to the Adult Time network, so it balances out. But the Adult Time structure is a jumbled mess compared to the old Devils Films structure, where it was much easier to find and access the content.
Video content for the Devils Film: latest posted number is 6,379 videos.
-Older vidoes go from 160p through 720p or 1080p. Newer videos go up to 4K.
Photosets have 100 to 200 or more photos per set.
The videos at Devils Film are gonzo hardcore. Don't expect heartcore or slow, sensual action.
Actually, watching these videos there aren't as gonzo as I remember from years ago: the videos often have a plot leading up to the sex. The plot is thin, the models and stunt cocks are supposed to be horny and ready to suck and fuck with little or no build-up.
So if you are anti-plot or anti-buildup, and want to get to the "good stuff" without waiting, Devils Film fits the groove.
Personally, I enjoy a build-up or some story line to make the sex more meaningful.
I also like some sensual atmosphere where the stunt cock and the model kiss and snuggle or show some emotion of liking or love beyond scratching the horny itch.
And that is lacking in the Devils Film videos: there is no tender emotion shown: it's two or more horny adults sucking and fucking.
The videos are professionally shot: good lighting, good sound control, good camera work.
But I want more: when I was a teen, I could get a hard-on looking at Sears catalog photos of women in bikinis and underwear. But my body is less reactive today, and I need more than naked bodies slapping together: I need some meaning to the sex, a fantasy or eroticism, to make me react or to enjoy the photo or video.
So many of the hardcore videos at Devils Film are boring, for me. Of course, that is a personal bias, and other PU members can have widely differing tastes.
The physical beauty of the models at Devils Film has improved over the last few years. The models look less like hookers and more like women you want to bounce on. The models sport fewer tats and breast implants.
I'm giving Devils Film a score of 95. That's because the channel has over 6,000 hardcore gonzo videos, plus complete access to the Adult Time network, which is probably the best bargain in hardcore porn on the internet: because of the massive amount of high quality hardcore porn for a very low price.
The major problem with Devils Film and the Adult Time network is finding and accessing the content you enjoy. The navigation needs to be improved.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Device friendly. Watch on Desktop, tablet, mobile, TV.
-Digital Desire was recently merged into the Adult Prime network. I believe it no longer exists as a separate site. Hitting the Digital Desire link at PU opens a web page that shows Digital Desire is now part of the Adult Prime network.
-As part of the Adult Prime network, you have access to over 80 different studios.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Digital Desire videos are available in 480p, 720p, 1080p definition.
Newer videos have a 4K option.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor.
-Digital Desire and the Sweethearts Club channels are both excellent sites that are worth joining by themselves. If you're into glamour or teen sites, these are top-of-the-line choices.
-Captcha sometimes required for login.
-Login details assigned. You can't choose your own.
On join page, it says your login details will be sent to you in your confirmation email. That is wrong. Your login details are shown on your join page, but not in the confirmation email of your subscription.
-Pre-checked cross-sales on join page. There are multiple cross-sales on the join pages, so be sure to uncheck all these offers.
-There is a model page, with links to her content at the channel. But there's no bio data on the model, or her physical attributes (height, weight, measurements, hair color, eye color, birth place, etc.).
Bottom Line:
Digital Desire is a glamour site. Photos and videos. Some of the most beautiful models in the world. The girls are 18 to early twenties. Mainly white.
Stephen Hicks was the founder and main contributor to the Digital Desire site.
He was a glamour photographer who died in 2013. He contributed to Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler and other men's magazines in their heyday.
Digital Desire is a large site.
Videos: 1738
Photosets: 3779
Glam Girls: 1320
Most of the videos and photosets are solo girls. There are some sets with 2 girls.
The solo girls feature mastubation. The twosomes are lesbian.
The quality of the photography and the videos is superb. The site was described as softcore glamour, but since the videos feature masturbation, I would consider this mid-core.
If you were a fan of the Penthouse softcore photos of the 1970s, many of the photosets will bring back fond memories of how luscious some of these Penthouse Pet of the Month were.
I admit I'm prejudiced. I find the Digital Desire videos, on average, far more erotic and watchable than the MetArt videos. The Digital Desire videos show masturbation, which the MetArt videos don't. Even leading up to the masturbation parts, the models at Digital Desire can be so fucking cute or desirable that just watching them creates feelings of desire, while watching the MetArt models, although they can be cute to gorgeous, normally leaves you bored and cold. However, the MetArt videos in the last year or so are starting to become more erotic: before, it was mainly a nude model walking around. Now, the models are playing to you, doing a slow strip tease, or moving their bodies in enticing ways.
No men are allowed in Digital Desire or MetArt photos or videos, as far as I can tell (except for the photographers, of course, who are off-screen). However, I once did see the hand of a male photographer in a MetArt photoset. It was a photoset by Paromov, one of their leading photographers. Maybe he was trying to direct the model with his hand?
I'm giving the Digital Desire channel a score of 95. Partly because the channel has lovely models presented with care, in both the photosets and the videos, to be objects of desire.
But also because you get access to the rest of the Adult Prime network, which has even more content worth viewing and collecting. Obviously, not all the content is great, but the Club Sweethearts channel is a fine teen site, with yummy teens that will tease your imagination.
Excellent review, covers the over-view and also a lot of fine details for the site.
You should post reviews more often.
They are worth reading.
Both for the ease of reading, and the fine details they include.
(By ease of reading, I mean the review is well-written, and a pleasure to read.)
Several months ago someone floated the idea of giving the best-written review of the month a special prize in the raffle.
That didn't happen.
But if there was such a prize, I would nominate this review.
SexArt $5.00 for 30 days.
RabbitsReviews shows that discount.
Since I'm a member of SexArt already, I can't tell if this is streaming only, or if it includes downloads.
(When I click on the offer hot link, I open a member page of the SexArt site, and not the offer site details--since I'm already a member.)
MetArt $5.00 for 30 days.
Same thing. I don't know if that includes downloads.
I'm a sucker for low-priced deals.
Except I'm already a member of both sites, so those deals don't interest me.
I didn't do a numerical count of the photosets and videos.
I just took those numbers, and the number of models, from some page or other.
Too lazy to go through the hassle of viewing all the pages of their models and videos and trying to add them for a single count.
I figured that a general figure was enough to give an idea of the amount of the content.
My last join was a few years ago.
So I don't have specific knowledge of the exact content from a few years ago (my memory is not great).
My review basically paints a picture of a site that could have existed in the 1970, if the internet had existed back then. With photo sets and videos that are in the style of the 1970s (except the internet wasn't around then).
Does the site update? Yes.
You get 1 or 2 new videos per week.
Are all of the videos new?
The video of Jana Cova, posted Mar 4, 2020, and Jillian Janson, posted Mar 9, 2020, might be older videos, since I don't know if these models retired. I had assumed they retired, and these videos might have been shot years ago, but I'm not an expert on them.
Neither one of the videos I selected were up to the quality of many of the Digital Desire videos I've seen over the years: the videos lack the sharpness and color vibrancy of the standard Digital Desire videos, which were excellent and outstanding quality.
Actually, I much prefer the older videos of my favorite models, such as Kenze Thomas.
Those videos just make the models much more appealing. For me, at least.
The photo sets and videos have a posted date.
So I assume that they are posting new material, or at least material that has been updated.
I've only started my membership at the site, so I don't have a good over-view yet.
But so far, my impression is that I prefer the older content: there are so many beautiful girls, that were photographed so exquisitely. And the videos were softer. Not as much emphasis on the solo masturbation. More of a tease, although there was plenty of nudity.
But yes, they are updating with new models, in the photosets and videos.
But I prefer the older content on the site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They've had a special discount of $9.95 for the first month for a while now. If you don't see that price listed, I'd wait for a holiday special price of $9.95 for the first month, since there are all kinds of holidays they offer that price at.
-They have an outstanding collection of beautiful and lovely models in the 18-early 20s age range.
-They have both photo sets and videos. The photo sets are offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-The videos are also offered in low, medium and high resolution.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
Cons:
-If you know what the site is, a stand-alone softcore glamour site of lovely young women, your expectations should be met. Don't expect hardcore action.
-The biggest con is probably that they constantly delete older material. Members often complain about it. I don't know why they delete when it irritates their members so much.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for most porn sites.
-No information on the models, except for the model's name.
-If you spend $75 at their on-site store, you get a free cock ring. Flash this cock ring at your local gay bar, and you can be the life of the party (sick joke?).
-This is a stand-alone site. No bonus sites are included with your membership.
-Video resolution goes up to 1080p. There are a few 4K videos, but they are definitely in the minority. Many PU members want a 4K option at the sites they join.
-Zip file for photosets is only offered in one definition. Strange for a glamour photosite.
-Some hot links don't work correctly.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Photosets: 3,800+
Videos: 1,000+
Models: 700+
Stephen Hicks died in 2013. He was the main photographer and owner of the Digital Desire website.
He specialized in high quality glamour photography over a decades long career.
His work appeared in such adult magazines as Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, High Society and many more when those types of magazines were in their heyday (late 1960s through the 1980s).
He had an eye for beautiful women. And he presented them lovingly in softcore glamour photography.
One common complaint from the site members is that a lot of the content has been disappearing for many years. Not sure why. You have memories of some outstanding photographs, you come to the site, and it's not there any more. Which can be disappointing. This can happen at different websites, but the Digital Desire site is almost famous for deleting content.
They have over 700 models, most range from attractive to lovely.
Lena Anderson, Lexie Fox, Bailey Rayne, Keisha Grey, Shyla Jennings, Jade Couture, Kenze Thomas, Kasey Chase, Victoria Valmer, Aubrey Belle, the list of gorgeous women just goes on and on.
How a model is presented can make a world of difference in how attractive she looks. Digital Desire, under Stephen Hicks, was famous for its softcore glamcore approach.
Since he died in 2013, the site has featured a harder edge: it's not hardcore, but what you could call midcore, with female masturbation, lesbian. But I couldn't find what you would normally call hardcore, which features men having sex with women. No men at the site (except for the photographers).
Note: the site did feature female masturbation and lesbian before 2013, but it was with a softcore approach. I'm not explaining this very well. Let's call this a softcore site featuring some female masturbation and lesbian activity.
If you are a fan of the Playboy and Penthouse magazine photo layouts from the 1970s, then this site will probably appeal to you. Stephen Hicks contributed to those magazines. He had an eye for beautiful young women, and presented them in a loving glamcore setting. In both indoor and outdoor shoots.
Many photographers seem to have a problem with outdoor shoots. With the lighting or sound control or other factors. But the Digital Desire site has a professional approach that showcases the photo sets and videos and they are just a pleasure to view. And the soundtrack, which can often be annoying with random sounds or over-loud music at some sites, is not distracting. The Digital Desire site just presents you with a polished, softcore product, which is what you are looking for.
Although this site does not compare in amount of content versus such mega-sites as MetArt, Femjoy, MPL Studios, I think it's definitely worth a join, if you are a fan of softcore glamcore photography.
Especially with the $9.95 price for the first month of membership.
Teen Mega World has a habit of starting new sites and quickly abandoning them.
Not always, but often. Teen Mega World used to be one of my favorite teen porn sites.
But it's been a few years since I was a member.
But the network has plenty of attractive young teens, which is one of their strengths.
I've had very little experience with Verotel, a payment processor that Dirty Flix uses.
But I requested my login details for a sub at Dirty Flix, and I get them in an email in less than a day.
Which is wonderful service.
So, I think Verotel is a good choice, if you have to use them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-They've increased the thumbnail sizes on the public preview page, and made the thumbnails brighter, so the models, which are mostly cute teens to begin with, look more attractive.
-Dirty Flix is a network with 15 sites. You get access to all the sites, there are no sites you have to pay extra for.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-You can view the photo sets in an online slideshow, or download a zip file of the photo set.
-The network has hundreds of cute teens.
Cons:
-Regular membership is expensive. The listed price is $30/month, or $120/year. But you can find discounts that allow you to join for $15/month, or $60/year. I paid $60/year.
-Login is not secure. You get a popup warning you, when you enter your login details, "This conection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised."
Which is poor. The only way to get into the members area is through a non-secure gateway.
Note: sometimes you click on the login link, and you are directly entered into the non-secure members area, without having to enter your login details (with cookies enabled). But I would assume that is still open to hacking.
-A lot of videos/photo sets that are posted here are also posted at Videoz network, which is run by the same people. So it increases the update rate at both networks, using the same content.
-The login details (username and password) are computer generated. So have to write them down, you can't remember a nonsense string.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-The photo sets only have one definition for the zip file. But because of the poor quality of the screen caps, even if the model is cute, I don't think the sets are worth collecting.
These are screen caps. The lighting varies wildly, from poor to good. The quality of the sets also varies wildly: the sets are an improvement from years ago, but can be cheap to nice.
-The photo set zip file downloads with the title of the video. But you have to manually add the model's name, the date posted, the name of the site.
-Ads on every member page.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
Network stats:
Movies: 1390.
Models: 727.
Photo sets: 1391.
Number of screen shots per photo set: around 50 to 80.
The photo sets are made from the accompanying video. The photo sets are screen shots. The quality of the photo sets can vary from poor to good.
The photo sets at the Wow network (a competing network) are real photos that are really excellent, much higher quality. The photo sets at Teen Mega World (a different competing network) are better quality than the Dirty Flix screen caps. The Dirty Flix network needs to invest in a good software program that will make better photos from their videos. The screen caps are better than what low-cost porn networks used to post many years ago, but compared to what competing hardcore teen sites offer, the Dirty Flix photo sets are usually lower quality.
Dirty Flix and 18Videoz are two networks offered by the same people.
The two networks are similar.
Both are hardcore teen.
The network structure is the same for both networks.
They even have the same ads for other sites at both networks.
If I had to join one network, I would choose the 18Videoz network. It has more content. 3,308 movies versus 1390. 2,249 models versus 1390. 18 sites versus 15 sites.
Both networks have a site structure that is easy to use. With a lot of attractive teen models. And a low membership price, if you find the $15/month or $60/year prices.
Both networks started off offering videos with low, medium and high definition.
Both networks upgraded their video player around May 2016.
Both network started offering 4K definition videos in November 2016.
Both sites offer a sorted video listing by newest, longest, or highest rated.
Both sites switched to a hot link of their models, where clicking on the model's name brings up her video content at the network.
I guess that Dirty Flix will soon offer a secure login, since 18Videoz now offers a secure login.
The 18Videoz network is strange: sometimes, the login is secure, sometimes it's non-secure. I'm guessing 18Videoz is switching over to secure access, and haven't finished the conversion completely. And since both networks have followed the same upgrades over the years, I assume that Dirty Flix will offer a secure login and secure member pages in the near future.
I'm giving Dirty Flix a score of 85. The 18Videoz network has more content, and more models. But both networks have the same structure that is easy to use.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A while back, they increased the size and brightness of the thumbnails illustrating the videos on the public page. That makes the videos seem much more appealing, the models look more appealing.
-The network and site are teen-oriented. They have mainly Eastern European teens, and most of them are cute or attractive. That is the main value of the site and network, how attractive these models are.
-Since the site is so tiny (only 21 videos), navigation is simple but basic. They use the same layout for all the network sites, listing 12 thumbnail per page. The thumbnails are hotlinks to the videos.
-Exclusive content. But this doesn't have the value that it used to have. Tube sites feature porn from almost all major and minor hardcore porn sites (edited videos, but not the photosets).
-No cross-sell on the rejoin page. I searched the page, but couldn't find a pre-checked cross-sale to some other porn site. Will have to check to see if I overlooked the cross-sale later.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-Verotel is the billing agent I used. They have been responsive within a single day, when I emailed them with 2 different problems I had with my membership. Not only fast, but they actually read what my problem was, and responded to it. Many times, a billing agent, or even customer service, will give you a garbled response for help, which is worthless.
CONS(START OF):
-Sometimes, when you try to login, you get a non-secure login page. Put https in front of the address bar, and your login changes to a secure login page. (This tip came from exotics4me).
-Tiny site. Only 21 videos.
-Archive site. Site stopped updating in 2014.
-The member pages show tiny thumbnails that are low-quality gifs of the video. They really need to enlarge and update the gifs to make the videos seem more attractive, because it degrades the experience of using the site. You're paying for a porn site, you deserve a quality product. Maybe years ago they could have gotten away with cheap-looking
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
product, who's going to pay for it? Either upgrade the site contents, to make it seem attractive, or delete it.
However, there are people who seem to enjoy unattractive photos and videos and low-rent porn, so if the owners/operators can attract paying members, I guess they figure that's good enough to sell.
-There is a photoset of each video. The photoset is a computer-generated series of screenshots of the video. It's a surprisingly good program that creates the screenshots, since the screenshots are nicely centered on the action. But the quality of the screenshots is just OK. The teen models can be surprisingly attractive. I realize I'm being unrealistic, but many of these models could pose for Metart or Femjoy or any glamor site, and they are instead put into junk porn.
-The login details are computer generated. You don't choose your username and password.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
You get access to the entire Dirty Flix network. This site and the network has a lot of attractive teen models from Eastern Europe.
The main negatives:
Tiny site. Only 21 videos.
Archive site. Stopped updating in 2014.
The quality of the videos is low-rent. That's the impression. Maybe I'm being overly harsh. The technicals are not poor, they just seem poor. The sound control is lousy, which is the most obvious problem.
I'm giving the site a score of 78. Years ago the site had more value, when cheap porn was first being presented on the internet. But for many years now, you can find porn paysites that offer good to excellent quality porn. So this site is a throw-away. Since you paid for the network, you can see if any of the site videos appeal to you. But there are better sites in the network that you have access to.
Note: I am giving you my honest opinion of the site.
But you are allowed to give comments on the videos.
And almost all of the member comments are positively glowing.
After thinking it over, I realize I was turned off by the site theme of degrading these lovely teens, not treating them with respect or tenderness. Which is stupid, on my part. If you enjoy watching attractive teens treated like trash, this site has strong value. The treatment is not overly harsh or rough, it's just the attitude that we're hep guys who can treat these cute sluts like the trash they are.
Second Note: I'm not a fan of ads, but some of the thumbnails of the models used in the ads for other sites are fucking lovely. If you like teens, you can drool over the images of these lovely teens.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of content. Domai was started back in 1997, so it was one of the earliest softcore photo sites on the internet.
-Instead of the high-gloss glamour style offered by many photo sites, Domai gives you basic nude softcore photos of young women (18 years old and older). Very little air-brushing that I could tell.
-The girls are mainly attractive to very attractive. Many of them are featured in other MetArt sites, as well as other photo sites.
-You get many of the same contributing photographers from the MetArt network, so you do get some variety of photographers, except that the overall style is simple nudes, simple costumes, nothing glamourous or exotic. Strictly softcore.
-There is a zip file for photoset downloads in low, medium, and high definition.
-Content is exclusive.
-There is a nice mix of indoor and outdoor sets.
-Codec for the photosets is efficient. The high-definition downloads are less than 300 MB, and the low-definition downloads are usually 10 MB or less
Cons:
-The main con is the price. Domai used to be, many years ago, a low-priced site (less than $10/month) that offered softcore nude photos. But it's now a fully priced site. $29.99/month, or $99.99/year. As a low-priced site, it was worth joining, because it has a large collection of nude models shot in a simple, non-glamorous style. But as a full-priced site, I would hesitate to join, because there are so many competing sites offering glamour-style photography.
-Photo only site. No videos.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join.
-They are running out of new photosets, so they are using some older content shot years ago.
But unless you've been a longtime porn addict, you probably won't realize that some of the content is old.
-The online slide-show mechanism is acceptable, but could be improved. You get a cropped photo with a large amount of black-space on both sides of the photo.
-Only basic data is provided on a model. Model's age when the set was posted, a few physical attributes. That's it.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
Note: the downloaded model data sheet says the age shown is the age of the model when the set was shot. But it's really the age of the model when the set was posted. Which is obvious if you've followed some of these models, who look like teens in the photos, but the stated age is in their 30s. So unless these models have discovered the fountain of youth, you figure the site (and many other sites, due to covid) are using old content and posting it as new updates.
-Due to covid, the rate has slowed. It used to update 5 days a week, but now it's one new update every 3 or 4 days.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Domai offers a non-glamourous, basic softcore approach. Many years ago I was a member off and on. The catalog of models was the main attraction, combined with a low-priced membership.
But since MetArt took over the site from the original founder (Eolake Stobblehouse), they've raised the membership price, and it's now as expensive or more expensive than most glamour-style photo sites.
So in spite of the attractive models, I would hesitate to join the site.
Unless you're tired of the glamour-style approach many photosites use, and want something more basic.
Domain is a photo only site, no videos. So that could be a negative for some.
Also, the site is extreme softcore only. No masturbation or explicit scenes.
Site design is simple and basic. Which makes navigation easy.
Back when the original founder was running the site, it used to have more features: short erotic fiction, articles on how to enjoy life and erotic photography, a loyalty program to make membership even cheaper. But that was all dropped after MetArt took over.
Because some of the models are so lovely, and many of the rest are attractive, the site might be worth joining for a month or so.
But there is too much competition, both softcore and hardcore, for this site to stand out.
I'm giving the site a score of 85. Because I have fond memories of the site. But the price ($29.99/month) makes it expensive.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-DP Fanatics is part of the Adult Time network. I don't believe it's considered a separate site. On the web page for DP Fanatics, it states that DP Fanatics is "A 21 Sextury website".
However, 21 Sextury no longer exists as a separate network: 21 Sextury was folded into the Adult Time network a few years back. When I contacted Adult Time network support, I was told that 21 Sextury still exists, even though it is now part of the Adult Time network.
-The model selection is attractive young women. Mostly white, European girls.
-The women are featured in hardcore sex: they are getting rammed by two guys, in their mouth, their pussy, their ass. So if you're into rough sex or anal sex, this is a site that will arouse your interest.
-Membership in DP Fanatics gives you access to the 21 Sextury network, as well as the Adult Time network. I'm not sure why they emphasize the 21 Sextury network, since 21 Sextury is only a small part of Adult Time network.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-As part of the 21 Sextury network, this is a professional site, where the technical features of the videos and photos are excellent:
-Video definition from 288p through 2160p.
-Excellent camera work.
-Clear, crisp images, vivid colors, natural flesh tones on the actors.
-Nice sets.
-Unlimited streaming.
-If you have downloading privileges, there's a 300 GB daily downloading limit. Which is more than enough for most people. I really don't know why they need a daily download limit, except for data hogs who try to download the entire network for piracy.
-High res zip file for each photo set.
-There is an excellent model page, with hot links to the model's content at the entire Adult Time network. As well as a model listing. The model listing has nice-sized thumbnails of the models, and you can view it by alphabetical, newest, or most popular. But since you have 13,834 models at the network (female and male), searching through the listing can be a mind-numbing experien
Bottom Line:
CONS(START OF):
-My personal preference is seeing one guy and one girl having sex. Or two women having sex.
I don't enjoy three-somes as much. Or four-somes or even-higher-somes. Keep it simple, is my thinking. But for people who enjoy three-somes, this site/channel fits the bill.
-I also don't think anal sex is the end of the world in sex. That's just me. There are plenty of PU members who really enjoy anal sex. And this channel emphasizes anal sex.
-Although the models are attractive, many of them seem to have breast implants. I mean, the breasts can be nice-sized, but they stick straight out, and barely move when the models move. Their breasts are more like bolt-ons. Their breasts don't jiggle. And when the breasts are large-sized, they are even more bolt-on, more jiggle-free, and would look better in photos, where the implants would be less obvious.
-I think the DP Fanatics site might give the wrong impression to PU members. The most common plot for the videos is a young woman walks by the glass door of a house and flashes her ass and bare breasts at the 2 guys sitting inside. The guys immediately start to rub their crotches. And then take out their cocks and start stroking away. The girl goes into the house, and it's sex party time, with cocksucking, pussy fucking, ass fucking. Real life is not like this, and if a PU member expects this kind of behavior, he (or she) will be sorely disappointed.
-If you join directly through the DP Fanatics site, the choices are:
-$9.95/month, streaming only membership
-$95.40/year, streaming + download membership.
-There's very little plot to the videos. You have a girl and two guys. They appear on screen. And with little or no interaction, they start fucking. So if you're impatient for the "good" parts to start, this site delivers the goods.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): DP Fanatics is an excellent channel of Adult Time.
Adult Time is probably one of the finest bargains in porn today.
For a low price, you gain access to over 50,000 hardcore videos and photo sets.
The quality of the content is good to extremely good.
The content covers a wide variety of niches.
There are 655 videos listed for DP Fanatics. So it's a large channel. The models are attractive, but I don't care for all the breast implants the models seem to favor. Also, I prefer a little more plot to my videos: otherwise, it's just two or more bodies slapping against each other, with little meaning to the sex. Maybe I'm a romantic, who thinks sex should have some meaning to it, even though I realize that horniness is reason enough.
But the videos are crystal clear, with excellent technical production values.
The channel is excellent, but it's not my cup of tea.
There are other channels in the Adult Time network that I enjoy far more.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU has a discounted price of $19.98/month recurring.
-The technical setup of the site is excellent. You get all the mod cons you need.
-Stream a video in your choice of definition: 270, 360, 540, 720, 1080.
-Download a video in your choice of definition: 270, 360, 540, 720, 1080.
-The videos are professionally made: Crystal clear video, good sound quality (they often start a video with the stunt cock driving a car or truck, and the noises are slightly muted, so you can hear the model speaking clearly). Excellent focus. The videos are just so much nicer than some low-rent networks that offer what seems to be home-made videos.
-The models at the site and network are A-list models. (They have 1,300+ models at the network, so not all models are cute or gorgeous, but the overall mix of models is definitely A-list.)
-The photosets are offered in small, medium and large definition zip files.
The individual photos are professionally shot photos, not screen caps.
Cons:
PROS(Continued):
-No downloads limits for streaming or downloading. As far as I know. Which is becoming rare, with many sites setting daily or monthly limits.
-Content is exclusive.
CONS(START OF):
-Cons are minor. This is a tiny site, but you get access to the Nubiles Porn network, which is one of the finest porn networks on the internet. Mainly because of the Nubiles.net site, which is like an encyclopedia of teen porn models.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Archive site. Last update was Dec 23, 2015.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. And matching photosets.
-The default file title gives the title of the video, but not the name of the model, the date it was posted, or the site name.
Bottom Line:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 13
Number of photosets: 13
The exact definitions of the small, medium and large photosets can vary slightly:
676px, 1127px, 3246px.
800px, 1333px, 3840px.
Video runtime: around 10-20 minutes.
-The plot of the videos is the same: a girl needs a ride, finds she forget her wallet, so she pays for the ride with sex instead of cash.
The car or truck has decals on the dashboard, which show:
"Gas, Grass or Ass
Nobody rides for free."
Which is a hint or precursor to the theme of the DriverXXX site: These girls don't have gas:
What girl is going to carry a can of gasoline with her when she is requesting a ride from Uber or Lyft?
Or carry grass, so she can get busted by the driver who's really an undercover cop or pervert?
So this is a real-life situation, where the only currency the girl has to offer is her body: SEX!!!
Since the site only has 13 videos, I don't know why they keep the site, except the videos are good, and there's no sense throwing away good content.
You will go through the site contents in less than a day.
However, you get access to the entire Nubiles Porn network, which has Nubliles.net, and around 14 other sites with over 1,300 teen videos that are top quality.
If the site was stand-alone, it would be 65 or lower.
Since the site gives you access to the Nubliles Porn network, I think the site deserves a score of 93, since Nubiles Porn is an excellent teen porn network.
Some PU members feel that a site should be scored as a stand-alone site, without reference to its network.
I believe if a site has free network access, that boosts the value of a site, because of the additional content.
But PU members are free to value or score the site however they want.
I haven't been a member of the Team Skeet sites for over 1 year.
But when I was a member, a little over 1 year ago, Dyked was part of the basic Team Skeet network, and not one of the premium sites.
Membership in a premium site, at that time, and probably still, only allows you access to the premium site, and not to the basic Team Skeet network.
I'm guessing Dyked is still part of the basic Team Skeet network.
And that you were misled when you thought it was a premium site in the Team Skeet offerings.
My apologies if you think I'm being overly picky.
Actually, in the review I wrote on the Dyked site, dated 06-06-18, I wrote the following:
'Note: when you go to the Dyked site, there is a banner stating that Dyked is a Team Skeet premium site. This is misleading. Dyked is included in the basic Team Skeet network.
They used to call the premium sites in the network "Unlock" sites. Now they call the premium sites "Upgrade Now" sites.'
Agree.
If you've never been a member of the site, it's worth a one-month join for $9.95, and downloading everything that you can find and think worthwhile.
But I'm very lazy. Just the thought of all the time spent looking for photo sets of my favorite models tires me out.
Maybe old age is creeping up on me.
Or---has it already arrived?
LOL.
You are more efficient than me.
Which is one reason I admire your reviews.
Brevity, conciseness, clarity, are parts of why I think your reviews deserve a premium over average reviews, and you're not getting paid what your reviews should earn.
I suggested awarding outstanding reviews with a better prize in the past, but no action was taken on the idea.
Which is one reason I would willing to share part of any prize I win in the future.
Shen also submitted outstanding reviews.
But unfortunately his participation and reviews have been limited for a while.
I believe that outstanding contributions should be rewarded, to encourage active participation from some members.
That's my opinion, for what it's worth.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Site is part of the MetArt network. So you can expect a premium setup:
Easy navigation, lots of attractive models, all the bells and whistles you find at the other MetArt sites: multiple definitions for photosets, unlimited downloads, numerous contributing phototographers, easy navigation, etc.
Cons:
-Slow update rate. You get 2 photosets per week. Since photosets are the only content offered, that is a major fault.
-There are no bonus features at the site. Or maybe you can call the cam shows a bonus feature, but that is the same standard pay cam show featured at all the Metart sites.
-The are no videos at the site. A minor fault, since most Metart videos tend to be boring, in spite of the lovely models.
-At least some of the photoset updates were probably shot years ago. By models who apparently retired years ago. This includes Camilla A, Caramel, etc. Actually, many sites in the Metart network are running out of sets photographed recently due to the covid epidemic, and are using old content as updates.
-I think the Erotic Beauty online slideshow player is clunky: you have a choice of a large thumbnail which only takes a small portion of your monitor, or an enlarged photo that expands beyond the limits of your monitor. The enlarged photo is meant for detailed viewing.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
I want a simple slideshow player that fits the image onto the monitor, which is what most other sites offer.
-The photosets offer fewer tags (descriptors) than most Metart sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Erotic Beauty is not a poor site. But when you compare it to Metart, it suffers. Metart updates with 4 new photosets or videos per day, except on the first of each month, it has 6 updates. Erotic Beauty updates with 2 photosets per week. Metart has far more contributing photographers, so you get a wider range of styles. Metart photographers: 289 Erotic Beauty photographers: 189
The catalog of Metart is massive: 22,234 photosets versus 5,243 at Erotic Beauty.
The number of models at Metart: 3,811. Models at Erotic Beauty: 2,184.
Number of videos at Metart: 1,781. Erotic Beauty videos: 0
(Except most videos at Metart are boring and a waste of space. Not worth collecting, no matter how lovely the models are in real life.)
The membership price for Erotic Beauty is the same as the price for Metart.
So if you're going to join one of the Metart glamour sites for the photosets, choose Metart. Erotic Beauty comes in a distant second.
Note: if you're wondering why I've been a member for over 12 months, years ago I found a special offer of $1/month membership.
So for $1 a month, I'm still a member.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
