| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I think that a lot of the reason for adding duplicate shots is to "up" the statistics on a site (we've got 1 million pics ... but only 2 actual photo sets). It's just an easy way for site managers to be lazy while giving people value when they're really not.
|
09-20-10 12:41pm
|
Review
227
|
Cougars In Heat
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ $3 for a 3 day full access trial membership through TBP
+++ Lots of actual American MILFs (no 25 yr olds)
++ Lots of good hardcore action
++ Multiple viewing and DL options for vids plus all vids have accompanying screen cap shots.
++ Exclusive content.
+ Each set has a softcore photo shoot (no softcore vids though)
+ No DRM or DL limits, supports DL manager
+ About 175 scenes, all with pics and vids
+ No watermarks on pics or vids.
+ Pic size comes in at 1600 x 1070, all have zips
+ Good DL speeds (500 to 700 KB/sec for me)
+ Updates are dated so you if you rejoin later you know where to start.
+ No cross sales on sign-up |
| Cons: |
--- Down to 1 update a month.
-- Most every scene is shot the same (especially the pics), it gets repetitive.
-- HD videos aren't HD and the best "non HD" files still come out blurry when viewed full screen.
-- No scene tags or real search function.
- Many of the video trailers for the sets don't work.
- Photo closeup shots are out of focus on body parts (get a camera man who knows how to shoot stills).
- About half the models have boob jobs.
- No model directory or model info.
- Bonus sites didn't work for me.
- Advertising on main page.
- Navigation needs some work.
- Canceling membership a bit of a pain. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's just about time for hunting season around here so thought I try a change of pace and check out some cougars on the prowl. What you get here is actual cougar material (women in their 30's to 50's) with the stretch marks, wrinkles and the occasional hairy bush pouncing on younger porn dudes for some basic sex (no anal, toys or bizaare stuff). The price was right for the trial so I signed up and here's what you get:
PHOTOS: Best quality pics are 1600 x 1070 and each set has zips. Most scenes have about 120 to 150 HC pics. The lighting and production value is pretty good with minimal airbrushing. One beef I had was that on shots closer than full body, something is always out of focus ... get a better camera or someone who knows how to use it. The softcore sets had more pictures than the HC and they're pretty good, no toys used - just posing, gradually stripping and maybe some fingering. For those who like older women stripping and posing, this would be a good site to try. My biggest complaint here is that every freakin' set is shot the same. Couple fully clothed, cougar gets half undressed for sex on back, side and cowgirl. Girl gets naked for reverse cowgirl and doggie. Every set, every time. Apparently imagination is not one of this site's strong suits. There are screen caps for each scene too.
VIDEOS: Lots of viewing options, DL in different sizes, stream in different speeds with the inscreen browser or one of yours, and there's an i-pod option too. The problem here is that even though I have a small computer screen, even at full screen only the "HD" vids weren't grainy. The best nonHD vids come in at about 300 mb for a 30 minute video so you can see why. The HD is good but it's not true HD, just big files (1.5 gigs for a 30 min. vid) and the HD only is available in the MP4 format. DL speeds were good. Many of the trailers for the vids didn't actually show the vid so that's a bit of a pain. The vid production was pretty good with only a few sets having the annoying cameraman yakkin' it up.
THE REST: No model info or directory. Navigation is a bit of pain, lots of forward and back clicking and it took a few minutes to figure out the DL functions. The site itself is pretty plain. The bonus sites didn't work but that maybe because I was on a trial membership. Updates have really slowed but the quality of the material is generally pretty good. The advertising is on the main pages or at the bottom of the screen but it's not overly annoying.
I can't really give this site more than an 80 because of the lack of updates, nonHD HD vids, repetitive nature of the shots, search and navigation issues, and some other minor stuff. If you're into actual cougars getting it on (or posing for pics) then I'd recommend the trial. The regular price of $30 a month is too much and unless you have a slow connection you should be able to grab all you want within the trial time.
Now, how come I never meet these women in real life? |
|
09-16-10 04:30pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
228
|
Anal Nippon
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Interesting site, glad you took the time to review it. Looking at the tour and your review, it seems like the only pic options are the screen caps. Am I right in assuming there are no "regular" pictures that come with the videos?
|
09-09-10 02:11pm
|
Reply
229
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
I've read numerous comments and reviews noting the download problem. I was a multimonth member earlier this year and I only had a few problems with downloads not completing or having playback problems and I downloaded almost exclusively wmv files. I do have a high speed connection though and I'm wondering if this is the difference. Also, I found downloading at certain times of the day to be slower than others. Not sure what the deal is but I didn't have many problems.
|
09-02-10 01:13pm
|
Reply
230
|
Hailey Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Just wanted to say that it's good to see you back here after so long.
|
08-26-10 11:19am
|
Reply
231
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Thank god I wasn't born catholic ... or have anything else better to be doing with my time :)
|
08-19-10 03:29pm
|
Reply
232
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
Just wondering what the pics are like on the network and if most of the scenes have pics as well as vids.
|
08-19-10 03:27pm
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As long as they don't like the poster child for "Lobsterfest" I don't think anyone cares. If anything, it adds more realism -- how many women do you know are perfectly tanned with no tan lines anyway.
|
08-19-10 12:29pm
|
Reply
234
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
It's my understanding that the sites like Peepeebabes and Fascinating are more or less clone sites that they use as another marketing platform. I believe that everything that is on on those sites is on the flagship 21Sextury network. Don't know why they went this way but there ya go.
|
08-18-10 12:32pm
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
This sort of question is aimed to irk the more Neanderthal type guy; the one who thinks that if his girl is servicing herself that means he isn't doing his job (which if he is thinking that, he probably isn't getting it done).
|
08-17-10 03:09pm
|
Reply
236
|
Footsie Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Review
My impression of this site is pretty much like yours. I just ended a multi-month subscription to 21st Sextury and while I enjoyed the site I thought that HotLegsandFeet does a much better job. The emphasis here isn't so much on the legs and feet except as an excuse to close up shots that blur the rest of the body. The emphasis on the site is pretty much all hardcore with their 2010 updates too. While it's good, I think the photography skills and use of lingerie and the foot/leg tease factor lack those of the DDF site. Not bad as part of the network but probably not worth it on its own for the foot obsessed types.
|
07-23-10 11:38am
|
Reply
237
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't like them mostly because you rarely see good deals (better than a TBP special). However, I can understand seeing a few, especially if they are marketing other sites owned by the company.
I disagree with Pat's analysis that the ads are keeping subscription prices down. I think most sites charge what they think the going rate is regardless of how much money they make from advertising (Does the price of Coca-Cola drop after a successful ad campaign?).
|
06-24-10 12:08pm
|
Reply
238
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
ipg386's Comment
Colorclimax quit producing all content in the early or mid 90's. Ever since they've been online all they do is recycle their old content. So, don't expect to ever see anything new from them. I sort of like their stuff though, it's pretty high quality considering how old it is and I would still recommend it for a one time join if someone is into older porn.
|
06-16-10 03:08pm
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It does depend. If its a network, I would expect daily updates. If its a stand alone site, then a few times a week. A solo site? That should be several times a week too. You also have to be wary if they include recycled or old nonexclusive material as "updates" too.
|
06-14-10 11:56am
|
Reply
240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I'm putting all money on North Korea to win it all ;)
|
06-02-10 12:51pm
|
Reply
241
|
Third Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks for kicking out a review on this one. I've been casually eying it but have been holding back waiting for a review. I'll probably put this one in my list.
|
06-01-10 11:20am
|
Comment
242
|
Velvet Mag
(0)
|
|
05-31-10 11:39am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I read the outdated reviews most of the time but usually to read reviews from the people I know and respect. A bunch of short reviews from one and done PUers isn't nearly as informative as an old review from someone who's been around for a while. Besides, rarely do sites change that much after a year or two.
|
05-31-10 11:16am
|
Reply
244
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I have broadband which well exceeds 800 kbs but it is mostly wasted when it comes to porn. Rarely do I find sites that hit more than 600 to 700 kbs so I'm probably paying for too much speed but there really isn't an affordable middle ground where I live.
|
05-29-10 12:49pm
|
Reply
245
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
I hope to kick out a new review next week or the following, haven't joined a new site in a while so my good intentions have been on hold.
|
05-28-10 12:26pm
|
Reply
246
|
Futanaria
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Review
Just wanted to say very good review there.
|
05-27-10 11:59am
|
Reply
247
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
So long as there is some country where porn remains legal and where servers can pump out the x-rated digitized 1's and 0's we covet, there will be porn to be found on the internet. Given the fact that child porn has proven so hard to stamp out with the technology we have it would be almost impossible to snuff all porn even if it were illegal.
|
05-27-10 11:57am
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Other than looking for prechecked stuff I don't pay any attention to them. I figure that if I run into problems I can bitch about it here and by trying to contact the site or cancel my membership and, if I have to, dispute the charges (I've never been fought by a website the few times I've had to do this). Raising a stink usually changes the rules if the website cares at all. If they don't, they usually don't fight over a single membership fee.
|
05-25-10 01:03pm
|
Comment
249
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
|
05-19-10 12:32pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
250
|
Porn Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
I like that you did the +++ and --- to highlight really good and bad parts of the site. I'll being doing this on my next reviews and hope more people start using this system to.
|
05-19-10 11:38am
|
