| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Hey Drooler, I just noticed that TBP is running a cheap trial here. I was wondering if they have any B/G galleries or if its all so solo on the pics. I was also wondering about how many pics per set they have on average. Thanks.
|
08-21-09 04:12pm
|
Reply
352
|
Naughty Allie
(0)
|
Reply of
HonestJoe's Reply
Way to go Joe! I've had to defend some of my reviews from webmasters before; it is a bit tedious and annoying in my book. Good for you to stick by your guns.
|
08-21-09 01:11pm
|
Reply
353
|
Euro Girls On Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
doomsday's Review
Hey Doomsday, just wanted to say welcome to PU; we're always happy to see new reviewers here. Good first reviews. We, or at least me, always like more details but not a bad effort. Hope to see more from you soon.
|
08-19-09 08:17pm
|
Reply
354
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Sounds like your sort of schizophrenic about this site; bashing it one month and falling back in love the next :) Any chance that you'll finally do a review on this place and put us all at ease over your variations on a theme ;)
|
08-19-09 05:37pm
|
Reply
355
|
Naughty Julie
(0)
|
Reply of
HonestJoe's Review
Welcome to PU HonestJoe. Good review there and I hope to see more coming in the future.
|
08-18-09 03:55pm
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Like Drooler notes, it is deceptive but it's sort of par for the course in the porn world. So long as the content isn't stuffed to the gills with MILF's and the babes look youngish and have a fair amount of teen content then I'm satisfied.
Personally, I don't see the need to push a website as "teen" focused when it's not. If your content is hot just pic another name or focus less on the teen content in the preview. Doing so is just going to piss off the teen obsessed.
|
08-18-09 03:25pm
|
Reply
357
|
Cozy Toons
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
All I can is thanks for taking one for the PU team.
|
08-11-09 11:30am
|
Reply
358
|
ePantyhose Land
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
For me the content got pretty repetitive pretty fast. The same basic setup and a lot of the same or similar looking models. The pic and video size and quality is average. Some of the sites with this company don't update or recycle updates I've noticed (at least in the past they haven't). If you've never been, the trial is probably worth it but for not for the long haul. Again, it's been a while since I've been so things may have changed.
|
08-06-09 04:12pm
|
Reply
359
|
ePantyhose Land
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
While I haven't ever joined this site I have joined other sites in the past that belong to the parent company without problems. I checked it using the ol' crappy standby Internet Exploder browser and got no warnings and my antivirus don't tell me anything was wrong either. Don't know if this helps or not.
If you've never been a member of this site or similar ones run by this company the content for me has been disappointing and I don't intend to go back although if you've never been and can find a decent a trial price it might be worth it then.
|
08-05-09 04:30pm
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I don't care so long as I can tell what the thumbnail is supposed to be representing. Like Drooler notes, cropping seems to be occuring more and more these days. A lot of sites I've been to recently crop some or a lot of the picture which is a pain for the consumer regardless of whether you're zipping or not (why do I want to go through a zip file later if I don't know what's on it know).
|
08-04-09 11:03am
|
Reply
361
|
Only All Sites
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Sounds like these people stole an idea from the amusement park people on the whole fast tracking thing. Haven't heard of this on a porn site before. On one hand, it seems like an interesting little perk. On the other, you know the update is coming anyway so why pay for "earlier" access other than the free fast tracks you get. I guess it sounds more like an innocent gimmick to me than a porn paradigm shifter.
|
08-03-09 10:42am
|
Reply
362
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I used to take the plunge all the time before finding out about porn review sites. At this point, I don't jump in unless it looks like darn good material and there is a full access trial. I can't see joining at full price (more than $15 a month) on just a hunch knowing that I've been burned before on sweet looking tours.
|
07-31-09 03:17pm
|
Reply
363
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Thanks for taking the plunge here and checking it out. I'm assuming the content is mixed, sort of like the Suze.net site -- in other words updates vary between solo, HC and lez? Doesn't sound like I'll be adding this to my list of places to go anytime real soon.
|
07-31-09 03:15pm
|
Reply
364
|
Color Climax
(0)
|
Reply of
Doug62's Comment
Colorclimax was a European print magazine that went out of business years ago. The reason they don't open up their archieve is because they want repeat customers/billing. Thus, they just endlessly recycle their content, putting content up and then taking it down only to have it reappear later as an update. It's not a bad site if you like 70's and 80's porn (I joined several times years ago) but don't expect anything new from them.
|
07-30-09 10:59am
|
Reply
365
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Good review on this one. I used to visit some of these sites years ago when they were relatively new and still had cheap trials. Although it sounds like they have a good amount of content now it seems like they're lacking on pic and vid sizes for the money. How was the Hell Cat site? I've seen some of her stuff on a tgp site I visit and she looks pretty tasty.
|
07-28-09 10:44pm
|
Reply
366
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
BigLouie's Comment
If you're into movies then this site is/was not for you. Met Art is essentially the webs version of what Playboy was years ago - the biggest and best of the softcore photography world. Because they do use a lot of different photographers and tend to focus on euro cuties a lot of sets tend to come off feeling a bit unsensual (that's been a mild beef on my part as well). Anyway, the vids are really just teasers, the good stuff in is pix which are very good indeed.
|
07-27-09 03:07pm
|
Reply
367
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
That was sort of the intent of the poll question, focusing on animation that is almost indistinguishable from reality. I think that's probably about 10 years or so away, maybe less, before these types of sites start hitting the porn scene. I think a lot of people will be surprised at how good it is.
|
07-24-09 12:05pm
|
Reply
368
|
Virtual 3D Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
Nope, never have joined this site although it did inspire the poll question. When it comes to pics I like sets or series and this site seems to focus mostly on "one off" pics or just a few pics in a series so I haven't been that attracted to it and the price is a bit high for me to just take a gander at it. Good luck, maybe you'll have to be the one to take the leap.
|
07-24-09 12:03pm
|
Reply
369
|
Mommy Loves Cock
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
I've done a few ultra cheapie trials in the last year without problems but all of those have been done with reputable sites and/or billing processors. I mostly posted this as a warning for newbies or casual porn users since the potential problems are less obvious than with some other sites.
|
07-24-09 12:01pm
|
Comment
370
|
Mommy Loves Cock
(0)
|
|
07-23-09 04:36pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
371
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Personally I'll want both but I sort of think that animation will have something of an edge because every individual will be essentially "perfect" as opposed to people who have their flaws and eventually get old. Life-like anime will also have the advantage of creating real stories, plot and action scenes that porn currently doesn't have.
|
07-23-09 11:29am
|
Reply
372
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Murray's Comment
Yeah, your comment pretty much says it all. I would still recommend the site for porn newbies to download a bunch of decent looking older stuff because the trial is cheap. Other than that, it probably isn't worth more than the trial orice to look at the content.
|
07-22-09 01:15pm
|
Reply
373
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
Great review, thanks for taking the leap and being the 1st PU'er to post a review. I thought it looked it pretty good so it's on my list of places to venture to in the future.
|
07-22-09 01:13pm
|
Reply
374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Nothin' new here. Check PU and TBP. If there outside reviews that I trust (there aren't many other sites out there in my book) I'll look there as well. Then the site tour and then fork over my card.
I'm with Drooler in that I want to check out sample pic sizes before joining which they don't have here. Hopefully with the reformatting of TBP that will change. My only concern is that the TBP reviewers will only look at a few pics and post the sizes when in fact the older material on a site ain't worth beans.
|
07-21-09 03:38pm
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Isn't really every ones dream to be able to do what they want in their career. To be popular and good looking enough to land a contract with a production company is darn near the top in the porn biz for stars. They've earned it, they get to decide what they want to do. If they don't do "enough" then their contracts won't get renewed. That's business.
|
07-17-09 11:59am
|
