| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Zilch for me. I just keep a separate list of sites that I'm interested in joining. Why risk anyone stumbling across your bookmarks?
Actually, I should transfer my list to PU. You can add sites and make notes on them in the "favorites" section of your personal page. It'd probably be easier to keep all my stuff here but I've just been lazy.
|
07-15-09 11:07am
|
Reply
377
|
Suze Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I guess she's trying to branch out away from her dad. It seems like she's been running the show at the suze sites for a while anyway so I wasn't sure what to make of her site; I sort of figured it was something of a clone in terms of what the suze content looks like. Look forward to seeing your review on her site.
|
07-09-09 08:01pm
|
Reply
378
|
Desperate Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
navycolt's Reply
In that case I would post comment here at PU about that site as well (assuming it is listed here, I didn't check). That's in part what PU is all about, giving others warning so they don't make the same mistakes we do :)
|
07-09-09 07:57pm
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Sadly, NeanderthalsGoneWild.com no longer seems to exist. Nor does the second site I joined, Cro-MagnonCumshots.com. Maybe I'm just getting old ? ;)
|
07-09-09 11:32am
|
Reply
380
|
Desperate Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
navycolt's Comment
Yet another reason to avoid all these so called adult hookup sites. I don't think any of them (this one, Adultfriendfinder, etc.) have reviewed well at all here and the amount of time, effort and cost involved makes going out and paying for an escort seem like the most cost effective route. This one though sounds more like a scam than the others.
|
07-08-09 10:23pm
|
Reply
381
|
Mature.nl
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
This is a case of not keeping up with the times. This site has been around on the net for years and while it probably had a lock on the mature market five to seven years ago it doesn't seem to measure up price-wise to all the competition that's emerged since. It also seems to have fallen behind on quality since their vids max out at 720 pixels and they don't seem to have large sized pics. Even if I lived in Europe I'd be thinking twice before plunking down 40 euros for a membership.
|
07-08-09 10:17pm
|
Comment
382
|
Suze Network
(0)
|
|
07-08-09 09:45pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
383
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
SteveF's Review
Good review on this site (a welcomed and significant improvement over the first few reviews you did). The only thing I would add is to include maximum picture sizes and vid sizes since these facts aren't always clear from the site info posted on TBP. Otherwise, keep the reviews coming. It's good to see someone new get involved here.
|
07-08-09 11:43am
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It has been very rare that I've passed on a model because she looked too young. It's usually something else that turns me off from the set/scene. I also like the "young look" (however, in reality they just look hot and then they open their open their mouth, guess I'm not going to be bagging any co-eds anytime soon) as its part of the fantasy aspect that I like.
|
07-07-09 03:27pm
|
Reply
385
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
All is mine. Since I tend to like pics and most people like vids my collection probably wouldn't impress most others. If asked I might share a few things with friends but I tend to believe that since porn is cheap in the scheme of life you're better off getting what you want from the sites anyway. I would never upload to some file share site.
|
07-07-09 03:08pm
|
Reply
386
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the info here. I'll be back to HL&F in the next few months. For one, I'm sort of glad that they're offering more b/g scenes but they do have premium softer stuff too.
|
07-06-09 11:30am
|
Comment
387
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
|
07-02-09 09:41pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
388
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
For a pornstar to have a truly positive social impact it would have to be for something else they do/did besides porn. Additionally they probably could only be on the fringes of the industry such as being a producer of noncontorversial porn (standard generic porn) although they could have been a porn star in the past. Also, they would have to have a great ability to convey their message for their cause and the cause would have to be something not directly tied to the porn industry. Not asking for a lot America, are we?
Jenna Jameson is famous mostly because she's hot and has built a large successful business. I don't think anyone views her as a success because of how many scenes she's shot. I don't think many people outside the porn biz look at her for inspiration though.
|
07-01-09 12:03pm
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn. The porn awards pretty much go to, and are sponsored by, the major production companies. These are the people who typically do a lousy job of putting their stuff on the web. As such, I really don't care who wins the best MMF porn scene in a back alley award. I'll probably find it on line in a few years and care as much about it then as I do know.
|
06-29-09 12:35pm
|
Reply
390
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Tease is good but generally I want to see the the whole enchilada at some point. I said maybe since I haven't joined any in the past but some sites like OnlyTease look somewhat interesting and feature women who stay mostly clad. When I win the lottery I'll probaby be joining some of these sites ;)
|
06-27-09 11:37am
|
Reply
391
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I was trying to be a bit cynical in my post and I guess it didn't quite come off right now that I look at it again. I guess I was under the impression that you could at least stream the HD vids before the six month waiting period expired. If you can't even stream then it is a 100% rip off as opposed to a 90% rip off.
|
06-26-09 07:24pm
|
Reply
392
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
I took a quick peek and yup, they advertise 1080 p HD vids. You have to be admit that they don't promise downloads in HD but it's still deceptive marketing. I also see that they are advertising "100% satisfaction guaranteed or money back" on their sign up page. I wonder if that's a scam too or if they're going to dooling out some refunds soon.
|
06-26-09 06:49pm
|
Reply
393
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
TeenModels's Reply
Sounds pretty sweet. Just curious, what are the other sites that members get bonus updates from?
|
06-25-09 01:02pm
|
Reply
394
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I look at it this way. Once you're on the net, you're forever on the net and you'd be surprised at how many "nice" people look at porn sites. The last thing you'd want is your co-worker posting a print out picture of your online escapade on your desk some day. If I'm 80 then I probably wouldn't care, hell, in fact I'd be proud. Until then, it just seems a bit job / privacy risky for this dude even if you're somewhat obscured.
|
06-25-09 12:03am
|
Reply
395
|
Men In Pain
(0)
|
Reply of
nostromo's Review
Just wanted to say welcome to PU and that I was impressed with your first review here. Hope to see some more soon. Regarding the picture statistics (1200x800) that refers to the pixel size; slightly bigger then what most people have their computer monitors set up to show.
|
06-24-09 06:24pm
|
Comment
396
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
|
06-24-09 06:19pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
397
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I normally watch my porn while wearing leiderhosen wrapped around my head, footsie pajama bottoms with cutout crotch, a Sponge Bob t-shirt and ... oh wait, this is a question about computer monitors ... never mind.
|
06-19-09 11:19am
|
Review
398
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Excellent $1, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ Lots of hot euro cuties (about 200 models and 1500 scenes split about evenly between pics and vids)
+ Daily updates
+ No DRM or DL limits
+ Pics OK at 1180x790 with some sets being larger sized and all have zips
+ Interesting function where you can change the size of the thumbnail in the photo galleries. A nice option instead of the usual tiny stuff.
+ Vids are of good quality |
| Cons: |
- Cross sales on signup page
- Navigation is a bit of a pain
- No model info and no search engine
- Mostly nonexclusive material
- Vids can be tracked via date of posting, pics cannot (a pain if you decide to go back in the future)
- The coding of the webpages is such that when you go to a page it has to load all at once, not gradually. If you have slower internet speeds it can take a while to load some pages leaving nothing but a blank screen for a while.
- Plain website design
- Problems with consistent pic sizes |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site run by the people who own Twistys but it's not part of the network. Not much of the content here is on the Twistys network so that was a good start. Overall, I was pleasantly surprised for what you get for a buck.
Pics: About 750 photo sets, all with zip. The pics are of good quality with good lighting and cropping and focus even on the closeups. Fairly professional overall. The content is pretty evenly split between hardcore and lez/softcore. Smallish watermark is tolerable. Most girls have multiple sets which is good. Most sets come in with 120 to 200 pics. One problem with a number of sets was that, for example, the portrait shots were 1180 x 790 while all the landscapes were 900x600. Same scene, same shots, what's up with that?
Vids: About 750 vid sets, downloadable in mpeg or wmv or as a stream in full video mode or scenes. WMV files top out at 720x480 with decent download speeds. Again, a good even mix of h/c and softcore and lez. The quality is good and the scenes are well shot and mostly professional in quality. You can look at the screencaps from the scenes to see what you're getting. Not all vid scenes have accompanying pic sets but most do.
Like I mentioned navigation needs some work. The only way to really find what you want is through the model directory since there's no search engine. The video page is good and easy to get around. The pic sets only allow you to go forward and back one page at a time. For pic sets, you only get one thumbnail showing the set so you sometimes have to dig into it to find out what the set contains. With the vidcaps, you can usually figure what the vid contains.
A lot of this stuff is nonexclusive and has been around a while (e.g. - a young Eufrat and Anita Keys are featured here). So, even the "new" upates were most likely shot quite a while ago. However, there was still a lot I hadn't seen before or saw in a "lesser" version elsewhere so I was pretty happy with the selection. Some may be exclusive but the site advertises exclusive content which it certainly lacks.
If you're really into the younger euro porn thing and you don't have a hard drive full of the stuff you certainly can't go wrong with the trial price. I could have stayed longer than the trial but the 3 days let me get most of what I wanted. If you've been around the euro teeny block a few times then a lot of the content will be old hat and you'd be better off spending your money elsewhere. |
|
06-18-09 03:21pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
399
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
I posted the $20 a month deal from this other site regarding Met Art a few months ago and then TBP added the discount a few weeks later. I imagine / hope that will also happen here. No since on TBP losing out on revenue streams that other sites are offering and you figure TBP carries more clout than some of these other discount sites.
I don't particularly like "cheating on" PU/TBP either but money is money (from one cheap bastard to another).
|
06-11-09 11:20pm
|
Comment
400
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
|
06-11-09 08:26pm
Replies (2)
|
