| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
126
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Gay men have their own Man Rule book. While it is much the same for some gay men, other have a different version. There is one version for the guys very in touch with their feminine side, those very laud and someone annoying guys they like to put on tv, the typical fairy. There is another Rule Book for normal gay men. Subtle differences like the rule stated above are different. They are still required to know what a field goal and a safety is in football (both types of safety). So, technically he is breaking now Man Rule.
|
10-08-11 06:01am
|
Reply
127
|
Boob Study
(0)
|
Reply of
wanker28's Review
I agree on Dominno, she it very good. She has some decent stuff on DDFBusty as well.
I was a member of this site when it was new, are they still updating frequently?
|
10-08-11 05:52am
|
Reply
128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
Man Rule #74: All porn should have a minimum of one female for every male.
|
10-07-11 02:31pm
|
Reply
129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
No not quite, but I certainly am trying.
|
09-30-11 08:33pm
|
Reply
130
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Pretty much all the above.
I have spent so much money on it. I could have bought a nice car with that money.
I have had it found many times. Do not even care anymore. Wife knows it is there.
Lost a bunch about 6 months ago. About 5 TB down the drain when a Raid volume got messed up. It was there I just did not know it. Recovered about 10 TB of the 15 in that volume, the reason was gone, I think the volume was too large for the recovery software but really not sure. That was about 7-8% of my collection, so not a huge deal and fortunately I have a file with all the file names in it from a directory logger. So if I want I can go back and try to redownload it.
|
09-29-11 05:13pm
|
Reply
131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I am in my 20's so obviously in the past 20 years. I was around 10 when I first got my hands on Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler. I was 12 or 13 when I got my first porn movie. It was 80's porn, but it was actually pretty good.
|
09-25-11 07:15am
|
Reply
132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Several years ago I bought 500 dvds for $495. Sold about 150 of them on ebay. Got about $800 for those 150, so in the end I made a few bucks plus have 350 dvds still in the wrappers. Had to stop because people kept reporting me (others selling porn).
|
09-24-11 02:41pm
|
Reply
133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I tend to agree with this. Externals are a bit of a pain. I have only two actual external hard drives but have the ability to make 20 more. I have a bunch of empty enclosures siting around from an older method of accessing them.
Now I have a good portion of my collection in two 20 bay hot swap SATA-SAS backplane cases from Norco. I use two Chenbro SAS expanders to a LSI SAS RAID controller. This works very well and provides ample speed for porn viewing. This makes skipping around very large videos effortless. Organization has become much easier as well since stuff is not split among many volumes. It was certainly the more expensive route but much more effective an worth the cost. I am not using ethernet for this, rather two 6 GBit external SAS cables.
|
08-16-11 06:43pm
|
Reply
134
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Haha. Although I rarely post on here now it is nice to see that I am remembered.
|
08-16-11 06:31pm
|
Reply
135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
No, not really. All of those items had long lives and there is no reason to suspect that Bluray will not either. I am sure down the road something will come along, I suspect that will be streaming (Netflix). For this to take over there needs to be an infrastructure change for most people to be able to have multiple megabit connections. Too many people have lower level connections.
Bluray was never a "must have" technology like DVD was. It was meant to be the next step, not a radical change. VHS to DVD was the revolutionary change that caused people to replace their movie collections. 99% of people do not buy movies on Bluray that they have on DVD already, the quality difference does not warrant paying for that. They want people to buy their new movies on Bluray and that is reasonable.
Bluray does offer a better picture and is worth paying a little extra for. Bluray itself will be surpassed at somepoint, certainly not in the next few years, but the idea of high definition will not. Bluray will be around for a while.
Now if you went apeshit and bought a new 3D TV I would say you wasted your money, at least for the 3D part. That is already slowing down, again. 3D sounds cool, but until it is actually three dimensional it will not5 stick. The 3D on a 2D screen simply is not going to work.
Yes new technology comes along, but you might as well enjoy it once it becomes affordable.
|
07-17-11 06:45pm
|
Reply
136
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Bletch's Reply
The trouble is that it is not the fault o the site. You are scoring them based on something that is out of my control. That would be similar to scoring a site low because I was on dialup and videos took days to download. The other sites may have different paths. Just seems to me to be something more comment worthy that review.
Don't get me wrong though, it should be stated. Too often we hear of our friends across the lake getting screwed by connection issues.
|
06-26-11 08:58am
|
Comment
137
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
|
06-25-11 09:01am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
138
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Bletch's Review
Seems like this review should be more pointed towards your ISP or somewhere in the connection path. 5 years ago I was able to sustain 50 MBit or so. The 15 MBit connection I have at home was always able to sit at the top, for days on end. There is likely something along the connection path that is bottlenecking it, this is something beyond VBs control.
|
06-25-11 08:50am
|
Reply
139
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
Queensnake BDSM's Reply
Just so the PU members are informed.
I received a direct email from the customer service, which seems to be queensnake herself...kinda cool. She apologized for the confusion, but they had mixed me up with someone that had asked for a refund.
I had intended to write up a review on this site, just had not got there yet. She did seem a little offended, which I can understand, I would be a little too if it was my personal site. Plus, it looked like I had tried to get a refund and complained after getting 97% through my one month subscription. I do not ask for refunds after staying around that long. If I ask for a refund it is 90% of the time within minutes of getting access to the site, we all know those kind of sites.
Now my access was terminated right away after canceling. She claims it should not. Perhaps something got messed up, but I was not complaining about one day. I just wanted my friends here at PU to be aware. Either way, play it safe, set an alarm on your calender and cancel one day before the renew if that is you plan to do.
|
06-20-11 01:36pm
|
Reply
140
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
Reply of
Queensnake BDSM's Reply
Hum....I click cancel they same way I always do. I even selected "no problem, just moving on" so I do not know where the refund idea is coming from?
|
06-20-11 03:48am
|
Comment
141
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
|
06-19-11 07:07pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
142
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Writing a letter is not so bad, calling them on the phone is great fun. It is ALWAYS a woman when it has to do with porn, and it is NEVER about a site like Playboy or something that sounds fairly normal. And she always says it in the tone of voice my principal used back in 2nd grade when I did something wrong, bit with more of the "you are one sick bastard" inflection.
|
05-30-11 05:49pm
|
Reply
143
|
Wank It Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
But the site "Midgets blowing horse cock" shows up all caps, bold, and in color!
By the way, I honestly have no idea if a site names that exists. And NO, it is tucked away in my porn library.
|
05-30-11 07:23am
|
Reply
144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
"How many, many, feet I delete."
You all know how much I hate to delete, but all feet pictures and videos do have a tendency to find there way to cyber oblivion. They have to have something else about them to warrant keeping them, such as the girl has large breasts or is just drop-dead-gorgeous.
If they did not sell, they would not make them.
|
05-30-11 07:16am
|
Reply
145
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
When all are focused on one person and there are more people than that person could normally handle. There needs to be a at leas a small line, taking turns. A girl with three guys, double penetration and oral would not count because there is no wait.
|
05-14-11 10:44am
|
Reply
146
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
This is an absolute must for me. For me it is hands down the most incredibly hot act.
|
04-22-11 02:33pm
|
Reply
147
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Incredible Pass (Incredible Fraud) is the best site I have seen thus far for ethnic diversity. They have many Indian and Middle Eastern women. Unfortunately that site is run by thieves and they will try to steal hundreds of dollars from you. Should you decide you must have this porn, thus supporting thieves, use a prepaid CC. This way they can not take you for more than the card.
Last I had checked TBP/PU suspended referrals and links to them. I bring them up not to promote them, but to make you aware of them. If you are searching for ethnic porn you are likely to run into this network site.
|
04-05-11 01:58pm
|
Reply
148
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
petefountain's Comment
Another thing about deleting the cookie is you can get different pricing options.
|
04-03-11 08:20am
|
Reply
149
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Curvy Kitty's Reply
I think you missed many of my points. I was not saying 100s of reviews, I as referring to reviews with scores of 100 or close too.
Everyone says they have "high res" photos and HD video but many people do not. You say that you have been around PU for a while, you should have noticed that many of us want the actual specs. Physical resolution, bit rate, photo dimensions and so on. That is what I am looking for.
HD in the past six months is well behind par. HD has been affordable for years now. You are going to get no sympathy there. No HD five years ago is to be expected. I would not expect an amateur site to front $100,000 for an HD camera that many computers would not be able to play. Not asking to be ahead of the curve, but certainly keep up with them.
Limited trials are limited robbery. Those are 99% of the time a rip off.
Something you need to consider is that when reviewing a site you compare it to similar sites for content alone. I would not go to your site and then complain that you do not fit into a size 2 dress. That simply would not make sense. Comparing content niche to niche is good. I think you understand that part. The other part is the more of the technical aspects. Video size and quality, photo sized and quality, navigation and on and on and on are comparable globally. Your product must look as good as the best otherwise it is not the best. Score of 100 indicate a site that is the best on the net, not just a single niche. Others have more content, Videobox, many have better HD, you may very well have the best niche content but that does not account for the other aspects.
"The member that posted, I will be honest is quite well a friend and perhaps was not fair for him to post." That was my initial point and is what I wanted to hear.
|
04-02-11 04:47pm
|
Reply
150
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Curvy Kitty's Reply
Well, I have been in the porn world for a good while as well and I had not known of your site. That in itself does not speak well for your exposure.
Frequently when someone is a member of a site for several years they do not get around the porn world much and do not have much to compare to. Reviews from fanatics do not do people much good. Only one of the reviews you have comes from a known member here at PU. All the rest come from people with a single review, yours. We have seen previously when a series of unknowns submits 100's and similar score and it turns out to be shilling.
It would not be a stretch to conclude, or at lest speculate, that you asked these people to write reviews for you. We a webmaster is in contact with their members it is very easy to get to that. That makes for bias reviews because they do no want to disappoint you.
The flip side of that is that you do have contact with members which is a good thing. Having not been to your site I can not say if it is good or not.
On that note, I will not join your site because there are no trust worthy reviews, my opinion, and I feel that you are trying to manipulate the system here. We have no information about your site, types of videos, media specs, cancellation policies, or any of the important stuff many of us here look for.
In reading other comments you have wrote to other members I have noticed you try to sneak out of people compared to other sites. You ask not to be compared to professional sites, skinny site, granny sites, and so on. The simple fact of the matter is that my money is equal no matter which site I subscribe to. You ask us to ignore obviously superior sites.
Being a solo site we would not expect for you to have as much content as the huge network site. Sites do get held to different standards based off of what they are, particularly when it comes to archive size and update size. What no one mentions is the physical quality of your videos and pictures. I would expect a 100 site to produce full HD no matter the niche, as an example.
Bottom line is I do not trust you or those who have reviewed your site.
|
04-01-11 07:52pm
|
