| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
676
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
The raw numbers (at this time) are 31 replies, 27 said never and 4 said they did or might. While that's 4 too many, it may also be 4 who are honest, so read reviews carefully. It may have been written by a rogue member.
|
12-08-08 04:22pm
|
Reply
677
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Ditto what Drooler has said.
The reviews on PU are better than any reviews on any other review site because they're written by real people, not PR hacks for websites. To post phony reviews would be a betrayal of everyone who makes such a positive effort to add to the quality of the site.
|
12-08-08 04:18pm
|
Reply
678
|
N/A
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Reply
WWW, you reminded me of the real big time turn ons for me:
1. Nina Hartley wiggling and writhing her pussy on the guy's knee. Strange concept but her ecstasy and the closeups of her lips wrapping around the knee just did it for me. (1980's porn vid)
2. Some Brit babe on a Fiona Cooper video in the 1990's where she straddled and fucked herself on a knobbed bedpost. Again a great scene because the babe was getting off on it big time. I just couldn't imagine any woman taking a chance like that if she lost her balance.
3. A glass table top corner like you described with Jana Cova getting off. When she finished the mess she left behind on the tabletop demonstrated that she enjoyed the experience. (wonder if we recall the same scene.)
|
12-06-08 10:32am
|
Reply
679
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Reply
Ditto Jay and Surferman.
Whether a toy is shaped like a schlong, is a lubricated cucumber or is the babe's panties is irrelevant. If the babe is gorgeous with beautiful PTA combo, I'm good to go.
If she isn't or if the cameraman gets lousy angles or uses lousy (or no) lighting, I don't give a ratzass whether she uses a realistic looking schlong or a broom handle, I won't bother watching.
(PTA=Pussy Tits & Ass)
|
12-05-08 11:41am
|
Reply
680
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Monahan? Who dat?
I live for posts on PU...but only while a new video is downloading or I'm cataloguing all my stash.
My plan is to have a double dry Beefeater martini, up, twist, shaken not stirred. Then yank out Little Richard, work him up to a Big Dick, watch a little vintage Christy Canyon (whose flappers, by the way, are as awesome as her hangers and should have been mentioned when we were discussing ISO standards for body parts.)
|
12-03-08 05:28pm
|
Reply
681
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Agree 100%. Andie Valentino's flappers are just about the right size; great for nibbling but not grossly stretched.
Maybe we need to take Drooler's lead and create a set of ISO standards for various body parts. Holly Hollywood for erect nipples, Jenna Doll for Double D Naturals, Jana Jordan for puffy nipples, Avy Scott for areolae, etc.
|
12-02-08 05:37pm
|
Reply
682
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Agree. What's GND?
Meanwhile, here's the kind of labia I dream about: http://girls.twistys.com/wk10gals/photo/4/andieval/image/16.jpg [Andie Valentino]
|
12-01-08 05:17pm
|
Reply
683
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I've been with Sexy-Babes.tv for over 3 years because they had a one timne offer at $9.95 per month. Then they added Babelicious to the package at no additional cost.
I handle other sites as many of you do; sign up for one month, drain off what I want, then cancel. Occasionally there's a "stick around" offer that will make me want to stay on for one more month, especially with the content rich sites, but that's about it.
|
11-28-08 01:55pm
|
Reply
684
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I was composing my post as you were composing yours. The pressure on Obama will be to control the internet to make sure that sites like MoveOn, Daily Kos and Democratic Underground are permitted to continue but that broadcast mefia is strictly controlled.
Government controls will abound in most areas by 2012 and, because the porn industry will never have any generally popular support, you can count on the panderers in Congress to show how "moral" they are.
|
11-24-08 08:38am
|
Reply
685
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
It's interesting that you make that comparison.
The two major changes in the porn business took place during Republican eras. 1- full frontal nudity in Playboy and the emergence of the Hustler style magazines during Nixon, 2- full insertions displayed in men's magazines during Bush 2.
And the emergence and growth of the internet porn biz also took place during Bush 2.
A month or so ago, UpChuck Schumer (Democrat Senator from NY) made indirect but pointed suggestions that internet regulation and limitations on porn were on the Democrat agenda.
Remember, the Republicans are generally laissez faire free market types (no governmental interference in trade) and the Democrats are generally interested in establishing maximum control over free enterprise.
I submit that those of us porn afficionadoes who enjoy being customers need to stay vigilant in the next few years to make sure we continue to have access, or we'll find out, too late, that it's gone.
Listen to Cybertoad. He's nailed it.
|
11-24-08 08:31am
|
Reply
686
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
The business model for porn sites is heavily weighted to fixed costs (content, hardware, etc.) so the marginal profit on all additional sign-ups is always good.
A sharp webmaster will figure out that 1000 customers at $24.95 is a better revenue target than 500 customers at $29.95 regardless of any revenue sharing deals in place.
Therefore, I expect that we'll see some reductions for the better managed sites.
BTW, Danni.com just reduced their "man-on-the-street" price to $24.95 from $29.95. (They run a good "profit shop" although their customer service element needs a lot of work.)
|
11-23-08 02:43pm
|
Reply
687
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I have several photos but my primary interest is video. The photos are from an earlier time when online downloadable videos were, well, crap.
|
11-15-08 10:02pm
|
Reply
688
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I've regretted letting my libido pre-empt my common sense and going for long term memberships, then regretting wasting the money because the site wasn't updating or was less than optimal quality.
|
11-11-08 11:24am
|
Reply
689
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Schumer's reaction to limitations of free speech, whether they are applied to porn or to radio, are echoed by many, many others in Congress including Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein and Henry Waxman, all from my state of California. There has been no, repeat, NO disavowals by anyone on the Left of the intentions to establish limitations on free speech and the comment by UpChuck Schumer was not a careless or casual remark. It was totally consistent with all other public statements made by US Liberals.
With the Liberals in power, the UK has already made major moves that are preludes to what we'll be seeing now that we have a Liberal administration and a very Liberal Congress.
Refer to the discussions in the PU Forum Free Speech and Porn and Big Brother Comes Knocking in the UK for more on where we are heading.
I'd sure like to be wrong but I've seen absolutely no indication anywhere that I am.
|
11-09-08 09:41pm
|
Reply
690
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
That would also be me. I'm obsessive about stashing anything that looks like it might be worth watching to the point that I have a ton of stuff I've never looked at. But periodically I'll find something at random and I'll really enjoy it. It's rare that I'll load a video that's true crap so I have areal treasure trove of boner exercise material that just keeps on growing.
Now with the new administration in place and UpChuck Schumer's (d, NY) anti-pornography tirade on Thursday, we may be in for some real challenges gathering up the good stuff if thye Dem's have their way in the next year or two, so I'm betting that external hard drive sales may be booming soon.
|
11-09-08 11:50am
|
Reply
691
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
Just finished checking out some of my stash and have another few adds:
1. Dwelling on one aspect wayyyyy toooo lonnnnng. OK, doggy style is good, but for 10 straight minutes?
2. Spending several minutes watching the "stud" jerk off while the babe just sits there waiting. What's the appeal?
3. Editing in earlier action again later in a scene. We've seen it already so what good is repetition?
4. Phony cum shots where the jiz is not real. And while [real] facials are OK, I agree with Pinche that there are far too many.
|
11-08-08 09:07am
|
Reply
692
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
My wording wasn't very good.
Yes, I disagree with anonymous trust ratings and accept the fact that they will be continued to be permitted. And the requirement that all negative ratings must have an explanation and that the explanation provided is reviewed addresses 90% of my concerns. I'm cool with the decision to retain anonymous ratings.
What I'm curious about is the reasoning of those responding YES to the poll who, by answering yes are saying that they have posted anonymously.
|
11-08-08 08:47am
|
Reply
693
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As I write this, 8 out of the 23 responses are yes, yet no one posted a reply explaining why they feel anonymous trust ratings are appropriate.
I still fail to understand why anonymous negative ratings are permitted. After all everyone is relatively anonymous on the web anyway.
|
11-07-08 11:03pm
|
Reply
694
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
All of the poll chices plus everything said so far in these replies.
My adds are:
1.the slapping of faces and tits by the stunt cock, either with his dick or with his hand(s).
2. Artsy fartsy videography where the idiot behind the camera (or the director) are more interested in impressing themselves than in photographing the babe that should always be the center of attention.
3. Excessive attention to the guy's dick and scrotum instead of the babe's PTA*. If we wanted a focus on male body parts, we'd sign up for the gay sites.
*PTA = Pussy, Tits and Ass.
|
11-05-08 11:27am
|
Reply
695
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
She's a new one to me but worth keeping a close eye on.
Another fox is Nicole Vaidisova. However she seems like she's slipping in her determination.
|
10-31-08 07:07pm
|
Reply
696
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
TENNIS!
Especially women's tennis.
You see it's this way. Those cute little tennis outfits with the flying skirts coupled with the tops that show the hard, erect nipples makes me a big women's tennis fan.
I know, call me a "prevert," but the women's game is also better than the slam bam men's game because there's a lot more strategy involved and the talent is awesome.
My favorite tennis babes for looks are Ana Ivanovic, Martina Hingis (now retired), Dominika Cibulkova and, of course, Maria Sharapova.
|
10-31-08 01:14pm
|
Reply
697
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Alright. I answered PU because I'm responding to a PU poll...
Here's what really happens.
When I'm on holiday I always have my laptop with me and I check my email at least twice a day; once in the morning and once at bedtime. Sometimes if nothing else is going on, I'll check during the day.
I also check all of my financial accounts every morning, in particular my checking and credit card accounts, to see what bad shit may be going on. (Last fall, when on a week stay in Kauai, I did my usual check of my checking account and found that a bogus check for $5,000 had just been processed. Thank goodness I checked because that check was followed by two more and would have wiped out my checking account and the overdraft backup securities account. I called the bank's 800 number immediately and found out that the first check was processed two hours before I called so they were able to do a trackback instantly. Skip the details...but the shithead processed two more checks that were in the system. The best part, he tried a fourth check, but with a bank that contacted my bank to verify the funds were available while he was standing there. Bingo. They nabbed the guy in the act.)
Back to the subject. Then, after I check my financial accounts and email, I check Porn Users to see what's new on the site reviews, then the PU forums, and any replies to my reviews and comments.
Then I check VideoBox for the latest updates on that site and then any other sites I'm on.
That means that there's no need to "catch up" when I get home because I'm doing that daily.
|
10-28-08 07:26pm
|
Reply
698
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Concept makes no real sense. The concept of porn is the notion that real copulation is occurring and that the watcher is stimulated by the fantasy that he/she is participating.
I would like to see technology permit olfactory transmission and/or user directed multiple camera angles.
|
10-26-08 10:55am
|
Reply
699
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Agree completely with Pink Panther's list and ranking.
Chatter by the stuntcock or the director is not an issue with me because I am into the action. If I don't like the noise, I just turn off the sound.
|
10-25-08 08:55am
|
Reply
700
|
N/A
|
Reply of
kkman112's Reply
Me too (Toshiba 17" Laptop).
|
10-22-08 02:57pm
|
