Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : pat362 (0)  

Feedback:   All (3599)  |   Reviews (184)  |   Comments (36)  |   Replies (3379)

Other:   Replies Received (1510)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 3648 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of yujin's Poll

For me the answer is all of them. I've never liked any performer just because of their looks. It's far more important that they be believable at what they are doing. That's why it's impossible for me to have a list of the most attractive performers of all time because it would take me forever to write it.

09-15-18  01:15pm

Reply
27
N/A Reply of yujin's Poll

No but technically speaking you are not legally allowed to trade/share digital copies of anything. The law is flexible on hard copies like dvd and Bluray but it isn't on downloaded material.

09-10-18  05:40pm

Reply
28
N/A Reply of yujin's Poll

You don't need to look at 4K because HD has already made every pimple, razor burn, skin rash the star attraction in modern porn. Those skin blemishes have always existed in porn because porn performers are human and if they shave their pubic hairs then they will get razor burns/pimples and if they do the same thing on their butts then the same will happen but in lower resolutions those things tended to be a lot easier to overlook but for me it's now impossible to miss. What's worse is that I can enjoy every thing about a video from the action, camera shots and performances and still I will not enjoy the final product because I can't overlook all the skin blemishes.

08-26-18  09:42am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of yujin's Poll

I don't follow the private lives of performers so their marital status rarely comes up. About the only time when I know that a performer is in a new relationship is when she stops doing porn or starts to only do solo and g/g.

Ultimately I'm indifferent on the subject because if she comes into the industry already married then all the porn that she does will be as a married woman and if she decides to date/marry and then stops doing porn then I will still have the stuff she did before that.


08-26-18  09:30am

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I would never do it.

05-25-18  05:25pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It's probably 10% or less but much longer if I add the amount of time I post on porn forums but I don't consider talking about porn the same thing as surfing for it.

05-18-18  06:22pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Wraith0711's Poll

Ron Jeremy has acquired some major detractors over the years and a few women have accused him of rape or at the very least doing some sexually predatory activities. Same thing for James Deen.

05-15-18  03:28pm

Reply
33
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

I think anyone who engages in that kind of evil endeavour should go to prison for a very long time.

05-09-18  06:04pm

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

It's not tricky for me because the health of the performer is paramount to my enjoyment of porn and that's why I am pro-condom. A guy wearing rubber doesn't affect my enjoyment and I would rather have guys wear condoms and ejaculate in the women than have them be bareback and ejaculate anywhere but where it would normally be.

05-04-18  03:12pm

Reply
35
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It is very important to me because otherwise what's the point. In a similar way. I prefer that the performer not exaggerate either because then it also becomes nearly unwatchable.

05-04-18  01:33pm

Reply
36
N/A Reply of gggfan's Poll

I like scenario porn and only speak/understand French and English so that basically means that my favorite type of porn can only be produced in two Countries. France and the US. I could add Canada but we aren't a very big porn producing Country.

04-26-18  06:24pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I can easily spot about 95% of all implants and while about 4% of the last portion aren't so easy to spot. I still to hit the mark more often than not with those as well. That basically leaves 1% of implants that are so perfectly done and matched to the woman's body type that it is impossible for me to know if they are real.

04-20-18  07:23pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of pornwatcher's Poll

I had to pick fellatio for the simple reason that guys no longer perform cunnilingus in porn so it's useless to pick it. That said I would much prefer seeing a guy go down on his girl before she returns the favor.

04-10-18  07:47am

Reply
39
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

I bought one about 15-20 years ago ago and it was so memorable that I don't remember whose pussy it was. I don't know how the new models are designed and feel VS my older model but mine was really only cosmetically identical to the performers pussy/ass with nothing inside to stimulate the penis.

04-07-18  11:14am

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

I do but since most male performers are usually at least a decade older than most performers than it's possible to argue that everyone has to some degree enjoy watching much older male performers with much younger women. Erik Everhard is 41 and he probably wors with women that are at least half is age. I have one even better. Mark Wood is 49 so he that means that he probably works with women that are sometimes 30 years younger than him.

03-28-18  08:08am

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

I've only had to call once and it was to cancel my Playboy membership. A membership that I joined online but could not cancel online but had to call. Needless to say that was the last time I thought of joining a Playboy site.

03-26-18  06:42pm

Reply
42
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

While I am certain that many of the other drugs named in the poll are as addictive if not more than cigarettes. In my opinion cigarettes are still by a huge margin the most addictive drug today for a few reasons.
1-They are easy to buy.
2-They are reasonably cheap.
3-They are legal.
4-They still get regularly promoted on TV and in movies to the point where I think it's time that someone look into it because for a time you stopped seeing gratuitous smoking on TV and in movies but I have seen a significant increase of it in those two types of media.


03-25-18  11:28am

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

As far as I know the vast majority of performer who were known with only one name precede the internet and that may be why they were able to do that and still have great porn careers and yet the actual number is still quite small. I can add to exotics list the names of Seka, Serena, Tigr(although she used many more stage names) and Angel but that last one is very tricky because she may have used only one name. There have been many other performers to use that name and the only real way to know which Angel I'm referring to require that you are familiar with early 80's porn movies.

03-25-18  11:20am

Reply
44
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It depends on the reputation of the site and the quantity of broken links. Ultimately broken links tend to point to a lack of professionalism on the part of the webmaster and that can easily translate to a lack of professionalism in the content on thw site.

03-05-18  02:55pm

Reply
45
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It's a scam but it's not one that gets me riled up because if you believe that you are going to get access to something that normally cost at least 15 times that amount than you deserve to lose that $1.

03-03-18  10:19am

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

I normally use the hand that's more in the mood than the other.

02-26-18  05:57pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

No because by definition if you can't see a listing than it literally means that you do not know what you are going to get for your money and I doubt any of us would join a site like that even if they offered a discount.

02-23-18  06:06pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Call me stupid but what's a non-nude amateur site? Unless I am way off than we are basically talking about Facebook pages.

02-23-18  05:58pm

Reply
49
N/A Reply of Onyx's Reply

I suspected space shooter might be best kind of games to play with VR Gear but the expenditure and ultimately limited use are why I have never gone beyond the curiosity phase.

Unless I am way off than all you currently have in lieu of VR porn is POV style porn with the viewer being placed in the role of the male performer. While I am more than willing to believe you that this is a better use of VR gear than computer games and I'm even willing to concede that it must make the viewer feel a lot more invested in the on screen action. I can't help but point out that it is still POV porn where you can only see what the male performer could see and therefore looking behind you may be fun the few times you do it. The action will still be in front of the viewer.


02-14-18  06:10pm

Reply
50
N/A Reply of Loki's Poll

No. As long as the discussions are civil than why should we be ban them. Let me rephrase that last part by adding that the subjects should be legal. Child pornography, bestiality scat porn should definitely be avoided.

02-14-18  10:09am


Shown : 26-50 of 3648 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.83 seconds.