Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : slutty (0)  

Feedback:   All (955)  |   Reviews (70)  |   Comments (65)  |   Replies (820)

Other:   Replies Received (467)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 376-400 of 958 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
376
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(0)
Reply of Denner's Reply

I guess I just never noticed. Wonder where all these sites are getting their material from, I guess none of them are all that original then...

01-20-12  10:59pm

Reply
377
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(0)
Reply of Denner's Comment

In my opinion most of their newer material appears exclusive. I do remember seeing a few scenes that looked familiar, but most of it didn't. Perhaps I'm just not getting around enough though...

01-19-12  10:54pm

Reply
378
N/A Reply of Capn's Reply

I figured you'd say 'other', as I don't know that the beer is necessarily all in Europe ;) I've got plenty here...

01-19-12  10:26pm

Review
379
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(0)

78.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Exclusive content
-Decent sized site, 810 videos at time of review
-Download managers work
-Decent download speeds (maxed my connection at 1.8 MB/s)
-Reasonable variety of ethnicities, mostly hardcore but some solo
-Zip downloads of photo sets
-Some attractive ladies
-Decent price, although some are cheaper
-Large DVD site as bonus
-No DRM
-No download limit that I ever ran into
-Video technical quality is good
-Comments section and scene ratings
-Navigation of main site is pretty good
-Decent update schedule, 9 per week or so
Cons: -Pre-checked cross sell
-Camerawork is some of the worst I have seen anywhere. I've seen home videos shot by 12-year olds that are better shot. Commonly out of focus, odd angles, zoomed at bad times, poorly edited, obstructions, etc.
-Too many tats, fake breasts, typical American porn network
-Bonus content is nice, but navigation of bonus content is poor, and a small amount didn't appear downloadable
-Ads, lots of ads, other sites listed at top of page, a worthless offer to a lifetime membership to Brazzers pops up everytime you log in (only valid for as long as you area member at mofos).
Bottom Line: Maybe I'm just tired of "American" porn these days, or perhaps I'm just pissed off that for the first time I missed the pre-checked cross sale, but I was not impressed with this place at all. I had always thought about joining here, but assumed it would be far too similar to BangBros and Reality Kings, which it unfortunately is. Some may like this style of porn, but I guess it just isn't for me. There are some decent aspects to the site, and I like the idea of a few of the network sites, but the execution is pretty hit-or-miss.

The camerawork at this place is astoundingly poor, I know they are trying to be an 'amateur' site, but that doesn't mean they can't hire a guy that can hold the fucking camera still (and keep it in focus). At times it really seems like the dude has ADHD or something. Also, the running commentary is a bit of a nuisance. They seem like they are trying to be the BangBros, in my opinion they would be much better off trying to be someone (anyone) else.

They do have some attractive ladies here, and those that are fans of fake breasts and lots of tattoos might really enjoy this site. I will grant that a lot of my opinions on this site are quite subjective, so some might really enjoy it, but if your tastes are anything like mine, you likely will not.

They have interesting sites, and interesting concepts, I just wish the execution were a bit better. I guess I will just have to stick to euro sites from now on.

01-16-12  11:17pm

Replies (2)
Reply
380
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Didn't know it was there, should probably check it out from time to time...

01-15-12  12:52am

Reply
381
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm with rearadmiral, depends on file size. I can see how limits might be required for profitability. I'd prefer a monthly "membership" limit to a daily one. As I almost never download stuff every day.

01-11-12  10:14pm

Reply
382
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

All the time, my ISP has instituted a "soft cap", so I try to avoid excessive downloads. Over 1GB gets annoying for storage as well.

01-07-12  10:31pm

Reply
383
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

nope. i'm sure if it were my lady, but not so much for a stranger.

01-05-12  12:22am

Comment
384
Visit Young Libertines

Young Libertines
(0)

Price Wrong?

I only got billed 24.95, so not sure if the price is wrong or it was just a mistake - the site still lists 29.95 so perhaps it was just an error. Not that I'm complaining or anything.

01-05-12  12:19am

Replies (0)
Reply
385
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(0)
Reply of Khan's Reply

Thanks Khan, no inconvenience, just trying to help.

01-03-12  05:10pm

Reply
386
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I read it quite a bit, but don't post too much. Perhaps I should more...

01-03-12  05:09pm

Reply
387
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of slategrey's Comment

Download Them All works here, but watch out for the limit. I couldn't figure a way to save the queue if I got cut-off (but perhaps there is one).

01-02-12  11:22pm

Review
388
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)

72.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Some attractive ladies
-Original content
-Excellent download speeds
-Download managers work (I used DTA)
-Good price through TBP
-Decent navigation, scene scores, search (although can be glitchy), model index, user comments
-Large network
-No DRM
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent photo quality
-Several updates a week, 10-12 on average it seems
Cons: -Odd biller
-Download limit, enforced regularly for me although others have reported otherwise (10 Gb)
-Video quality is okay on mid-sized videos, didn't download any HD videos due to limit
-No sizes given on videos
-Many of the sites are dead or infrequently updated
-Content can get repetitive
-A subjective opinion, but girls are too "porn" for me, lots of tats, large breasts
-Seem obsessed with ass, I like an ass and all, but move on after a while
-Camerawork is mediocre to downright annoying
-Male talent can get grating
-Lack of variety, even though it is a network serving several niches, all of the content has the same feel
-Too many ads, all over the damn place
Bottom Line: This site used to be one of my favorites years ago, and everytime I join I am less and less impressed with it. I read my review from before and am surprised I scored it so high, perhaps I was just in a good mood. Regardless, I don't think I will be giving them another chance.

The site does some stuff well, navigation is pretty good, download speeds were excellent (I maxed my connection at 1.4 MB/s). Their is some good material, and I enjoy the concept of some sites.

I am just unsure as to why some of these sites even exist - if it has less than 10 updates and hasn't had a new one in years can't you just merge the content somewhere? It just seems like an advertising gimmick.

There is still some good material, particularly the older stuff. But, it seems as though they have become far to focussed on the glam porn star look, even in their euro sites (Mike's Apartment and Sex Parties). For a supposed "reality/amateur" site, it just doesn't seem to fit anymore. For those that are fans of the typical late 90's-style porn star, this site might still be for you, but it is no longer for me. I grant you that this opinion is subjective, but they have definitely moved away from what I liked about the site. Also, it seems as though they get more and more focussed on asses over time. I like to see the entire woman, not 2 minutes of ass shots.

On top of these somewhat subjective complaints, they have a relatively firm limit of 10GB now, although I never came within 500 MB of that limit I was cut off frequently. I don't really consider myself a heavy downloader by any means, I tend to go through the screencaps to see if it is a scene I actually want. If you are going to impose a download limit, you should take note of your file sizes, and let users know - a 10GB limit with files in excess of 1GB is just irritating.

Overall, I think this site still has some decent older material, maybe worth joining once to get it. If you are into their older material, and unless you are totally obsessed with ass (not necessarily anal sex, just ass) I don't think you will be pleased with the direction of the site and I would recommend looking elsewhere, there are plenty of decent networks out there, although you may have to pay more.

01-02-12  11:19pm

Replies (1)
Reply
389
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(0)
Reply of pat362's Reply

Probably just a way for them to do the discount or something. Thanks for the review, good info to know.

01-02-12  10:57pm

Reply
390
Visit Mofos Network

Mofos Network
(0)
Reply of pat362's Review

Hey pat,

Just thought I'd point out if you go to their site directly rather than use the PU link, their preview page is pretty typical of a network like this (similar to the RK preview), I am not sure why the PU link takes us somewhere different.


01-02-12  03:49pm

Reply
391
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

There is a link at the bottom that says "no thanks skip this offer", or at least it shows up for me. You are cancelling directly through the support link on the RK website right?

01-02-12  02:48pm

Reply
392
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Reply

Yeah, also if you are going to have a DL limit on the site, it might be useful to list the damn file size. So many times I started to download a file and then was like, oh wait that's too large, I should download the smaller version... I don't recall ever hitting a limit here before either, so perhaps it is a new thing, or at least enforcing it is.

01-02-12  01:56pm

Reply
393
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

Nice review rearadmiral, I joined just before the holidays, and really wish I hadn't. I have hit the limit every day I have tried at under 10 GB (usually like 9.5), even when I hadn't logged in for several days. I don't know why I keep coming back here, it just seems to go further downhill every year. I think your 75 is appropriate, and will probably change my score to something similar, if not lower.

Also, DTA works at RK, but you have to be careful about losing the queue if the cap kicks in.


01-01-12  09:08pm

Reply
394
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

From time to time, but rarely follow through. Eating better is my usual resolution.

01-01-12  08:57pm

Reply
395
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

pretty much agree with bicardiancoke, why not if the material looks good?

12-23-11  12:29am

Reply
396
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(0)
Reply of rearadmiral's Comment

Ha! That instant stream thing pisses me off to no end as well, so many times forgetting to mute my speaders...

Thanks for the info on Kink, sounds like a reasonable way to get a sampling without having to join all the sites. How to the video specs compare with what you would get directly from Kink?


12-20-11  10:32pm

Reply
397
Visit Double View Casting

Double View Casting
(0)
Reply of pat362's Review

Nice review pat, I was curious about this place a while ago, but based on your review I think I'll look elsewhere (not a huge fan of anal). Very helpful!

12-20-11  10:24pm

Reply
398
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Usually Windows Media Player or VLC, although I'm not really a huge fan of either I'm just too lazy and virus paranoid to find something better.

12-20-11  10:21pm

Reply
399
Visit Teen Sex Mania

Teen Sex Mania
(0)
Reply of theonon's Review

Nice first review (mine was much worse), welcome to PU. Don't worry about taking flack for giving a site a 100. I agree it is an excellent site. There is a thread in the forum about stuff to include in reviews that I found very useful, it also helps in preventing folks from jumping all over you.

12-20-11  10:17pm

Review
400
Visit Young Libertines

Young Libertines
(0)

68.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM
-Download managers work
-Some attractive ladies
-zip downloads of photos
-Multiple video formats
-Interesting concept, supposedly submitted videos by 'amateurs'
-Photo quality decent 1500x1000, although some are pretty bad
-I believe content is exclusive
-Respectable biller, I had SegPay
Cons: -Download speeds are inconsistent, varies between 200 KB/s and 800 KB/s with manager
-Camerawork varies between poor and mediocre
-Glitchy website
-Very poor navigation, has search function but it is totally worthless. No model index,
-No real bonus content
-Smallish site, only 362 sets, and a lot of the older material is the same few models
-Expensive compared to other euro sites
-Video quality is mediocre, best option is 640x480 2200 kbps
-Only one update per week
-Too many freaking ads
Bottom Line: As with many smaller euro sites these days, this site is pretty hit-or-miss. Although, I'd say for the most part for me it is a miss. This is a primarily hardcore site featuring supposedly self submitted videos by 'amateurs'. Many of these ladies are somewhat recognizeable to those that commonly join eastern-euro sites. While there are some attractive ladies and decent videos to be found here, there are just too many negatives for me to recommend this place.

I am not sure why they don't start merging all the sites this company owns together, it seems as though that would be the only way to remain competitive with some of the larger network sites, unless they start producing much higher quality (from both a technical and model standpoint) material.

I joined this site primarily because it had a few scenes by some ladies I collect, and pretty much right when I logged in for the first time I wished I hadn't joined.

The navigation is miserable, so I guess in some sense you are lucky it is a small site. Basically the only way to get through it is page by page (which only show 4 sets at a time), trying not to accidentally click on an add and looking at the small preview pictures. There are tags for sets although it didn't appear as though they are well used, and even though they have named the models, the didn't bother linking their sets together in any fashion. The site in general doesn't look like much effort was put forth, and that probably should have been a hint not to join.

Overall, the site provides some interesting videos, I will probably keep 10-20 of them. But, there are just too many cons: poor navigation, substandard video quality, bad download speeds, too expensive, and no bonus content. I wouldn't recommend joining here unless they make some major changes.

12-16-11  10:38pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 376-400 of 958 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.41 seconds.