that would make for some pretty awkward "love". perhaps that ride in Epcot, can't remember what's its called ad haven't been there in forever.
the most recent place I have seen a kissing booth was a hipster d-bag valentines party a couple of years ago, but the girls weren't that cute and it seemed particularly odd on valentines day. i assume they are still be legal, but I doubt they would have checked the laws before setting it up at the bar.
What is with all the new video types at this family of sites? I can understand that some are supposed to be better or easier to include subtitles or whatever, but I have had nothing but problems with the mkv or flv files (load lag, glitches in playback, audio problems). Why not stick with the regualar old mp4? Their high quality wmv is decent, I just don't always feel like downloading a 1+GB video.
Interesting review. I found the site interesting, and he definitely gets some attractive, somewhat "real" amateurs, but I do think the guy on this site is a pretty large douche, on par with the BangBros guys.
While I think there is plenty of diversity if you join sites devoted to it, I don't find that some of the larger - especially DVD sites - are all that diverse.
I came into some fine birthday money, so I joined there and ddf, probably could have spent it a little better now that I think about it, but ah well... doubt i will be spending that kind of money on a site again.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-attractive models
-decent video quality, I mostly downloaded the "middle" quality 704x396 1200 kbps avi, reasonably crisp. The HD video is 4000 kbps and decent, but I didn't download many of these given the file size.
-decent download speeds, better than 1MB/s most times I tried
-little to no cencorship, I didn't see any in the videos I downloaded
-no drm
-download managers sort of work
-customer service is friendly and helpful
-good sized site 1672 videos at time of review
Cons:
-quite expensive
-navigation is poor, typically you just have to look through every video offered
-ads on site, some of which are in japanese, so you have to be careful where you click
-movies can be long, although this is typical of japanese porn, most are more than 40 minutes
-join process is a nuisance, can't join with a web-based email service for some reason
-billing through their company, DTI
-there is supposedly a 6-gig limit, although I must never have hit it, as I never got cut off.
-not much in the way of photosets
Bottom Line:
This was a tough site for me to review, I found the model quality overall to be very good, however it is hard to say if it is worth the price. If the price were more in-line with other sites, I would probably score this place in the high 80s. I think if you are really into Japanese porn, but don't like the mosaic that is typically found, this site might be worth joining. If it is just an occasional fancy, I would probably look for something cheaper.
Like much of the Japanese porn I have seen, the scenes can be somewhat odd to a westerner, but personally I find them pretty hot for the most part. Toy use is frequent, and creampies are the most common ending, and lesbian content is pretty rare, unless you count group as lesbian (which they do).
To answer a comment from earlier, while some of the women are shaven, I found the ratio to be pretty typical of other sites in this niche I have joined, mostly hairy, some trimmed, few shaven.
Aside from dropping the price, it would be nice if they improved the navigation. Their are some dead links, some that lead to "movie removed" pages, and their index of material types I found to be pretty worthless. It would also be nice to have some more photos, for the most part they are just screen caps, and no zips are available.
Overall I think this is a decent site, that is too highly priced. The model quality and video quality are both good, and the lack of censorship is great. It might be a place to consider if this is one of your favorite niches. However, if not, I'd probably save the money and join jsex or something of the sort for half the price (even though most of their stuff is censored). Also, this is definitely not a place for fans of photos.
Like many, got burned several times on sites, especially in the old days (the late 90's early aughts), although much less frequently since I've been a member here. Still occasionally take a risk, though.
I like pat's thoughts, if only all our bad reviews brought about change that would be lovely!
I suppose that is the case, but there are other sites are putting out decent content, many euro sites included amongst those, so what is their excuse? It just seems like their standards have gone way down, I'd rather a site put out 1 decent scene a week than 5 mediocre ones. I was a member of x-art for a few months even though their update rate is relatively slow, because their updates were usually pretty good (albeit short).
Can't disagree with your review, I totally agree it isn't much of a site and totally worthless as a standalone, although I will say that I do really enjoy a few of their scenes, the sonia red scene they have here is for some reason my favorite scene of her. Although curiously they have merged a good portion of this material with their other sites, so not sure why they even bother keeping it.
I'm always curious how accurate the subtitles are...
It is pretty plastic, but I have always been drawn to their coed material for some reason... Probably because the first "porn" (if you can call it that) magazine I bought was one of those Girls of the ACC or something that Playboy puts out.
Outside of those, the shoots are all way over-photoshopped and excessively plastic as you say.
It is humorous to go back through and watch the bush slowly grow as you go further and further back in time.
Ha! My memory is terrible, all that beer in college just straight killed it. The only reason I remember that site is cause the name is so ludicrous it was hard to forget. Obviously if porn companies chose more rediculous site names they'd have a better shot of getting me as a member...
I don't recall seeing it listed on the Deisel access page when I was a member either, I think they probably just merged it with one of the other two teen sites. I seem to recall it being mostly duplicate material anyways...
I think they've had sound sync problems for a while, I didn't even notice when I was a member some time ago (since I often don't listen to the audio), but I do have several videos that have some audio sync issues.
Did they go back and re-encode all their really old material to 1080x720, or just take it off the site in order to meet that claim? I actually thought their 640x480 mp4 was pretty decent considering the size (from a video perspective)...
Joined primarily for the new Zuzana Z hardcore material, which was pretty underwhelming, but even aside from that this place in general seems to be going downhill. The updates are pretty frequent, but I find the model quality vastly inferior to 1byday's heyday of a few years ago.
Should have read my own comment from last year and not wasted my well earned birthday cash here... Oh well, I think this was their last and final chance for me, don't think I'll be coming back.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Decent number of models, hard to get an exact figure but pretty large collection
-No DRM on newer videos, appears to have started in 2009 as well, but only for some models
-Zip downloads of some of the newer photosets (seems like this started in 2009 for the most part)
-Some attractive ladies
-Download managers work, although there isn't much to download with them
-Good photography
-Decent price with TBP
-Navigation is acceptable although not the best
-Download speeds are decent, I got 1 MB/sec, although once again not much to download
-Newer streaming videos are decent quality
Cons:
-Too many 'fake' women, although it is Playboy so what should one expect...
-Difficult to tell which of the many sites you are getting when you join
-Click on links to models and get directed to content you don't have access to
-Video quality is sub-par, 840x480 2900 kbps is the best I have seen, and it isn't well encoded for the downloadable videos
-Photo quality is mediocre, typically 1600 long-end.
-Prechecked cross sell
-Too many adds, up-sells, and other junk on the site
-It just takes to much time to go through it all, I doubt I will
Bottom Line:
To be fair, this site is pretty much what I expected, and what most people should. Overly made up, often fake breasted women in softcore photoshoots. I wish there were a greater variety of body types, but it is Playboy after all.
Given that, it isn't a terrible site, but I probably wont be joining it again unless they make it all inclusive, make all videos downloadable, and increase their video and photo specs significantly.
The main reason I joined was someone told me there was a local girl who had posed for them, which would have been interesting, but I couldn't find her, and I was in the mood for some softcore material. Probably should have just joined MetArt again or something, but oh well.
It is hard for me to be too harsh with this place, because I was well aware of this companies faults, and pretty much expected what I got, although for some reason I thought the TV stuff was included with the subscription, but I guess it isn't. Or at least I can't find it, not that I would watch it much anyways.
Probably an okay place to join if you are into the not-so-endangered large breasted american blonde and very soft softcore, but it is definitely hard to recommend.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
