| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Currently use a combination. Totem for most. VLC for any others that do not play in Totem, and MPlayer for any that do not play either wise. Flash will not be much of a contender until they release the 'Moviestar' update and has good adoption.
|
10-24-07 02:59pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I choose "Other" because there are a few properties that are required to make a video HD. Today there are only a few codecs that are capable of true-to-the-standard HD. I will typically accept DivX/XVid, WMV (Windows Media Video), MP4 (MPEG-4), OGG Theora (open-sourced MPEG-4), and MOV (Apple Quicktime), and any other codecs that are H.264 compatible. I listed the codecs that are used most often and must meet certain criteria:
The video dimensions must be the right size: 1280 x 720 or higher.
With current compression methods, HD video is usually between 900 kb/s - 2mb/s bitrate depending on the codec and overall quality. 900kb/s will usually give you about a DVD-quality picture (with larger dimensions than a DVD) which is fine for my requirements.
Even that is a conservative estimate because beyond the video's dimensions, I accept a video as HD even if it does not precisely meet the written standards for HD in broadcasting.
|
10-20-07 08:32pm
|
Reply
78
|
Nude Sport Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
Nice review. I was a member around the time when they first opened the site, so I havent given a review. I really like their content. You can't beat girls working out! I just never really liked the site they included, nudevoyeur.com. I wish they would offer a 2-site price including this site and SpecialExercises.com, their other exercise site. I am planning on joining again soon to see what new stuff they have.
|
10-14-07 04:37pm
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cblodg's Poll
I usually use forums as a secondary to showing when updates occur. Some sites do not tell you except in the forums. I really don't like forums in members areas that you have to sign up for after loggin into the members area. It should, at the very least, use your own membership user/password or, even better, be logged in automatically using your membership user/pass.
I don't use them often though.
One of the only one's I have used was in LittleMutt since they would often give you previews or a heads up on what sets and videos were on the way.
|
10-14-07 07:02am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Rick, I told you when you implemented new rules early on that there should be required reasons for voting someone "no" on trust ratings and you gave me a list of reasons why it should not be implemented... naughty Rick... :)
Glad it will be though!
|
09-23-07 08:36pm
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I guess I could call myself a 'porn junkie' but not just from buying memberships. Considering I like content from many sites (and unfortunately you can't get it all in one site), I have to admit that I have alternative ways of acquiring content in addition to joining sites.
|
09-15-07 04:55pm
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Considering everything today is automated and logins are pretty much instantaneous, being able to log in is important and issues should be dealt with quickly.
|
09-12-07 05:15am
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Woodruff's Poll
Yoda was right! I never go to a site just for one thing. I have been interested in individual models, but realize that if it is a lesser-known site with many non-exclusive models, she's bound to show up somewhere else!
|
09-09-07 06:25am
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
For some reason, the first two responses seem synonymous with one another. Having them work well in MOST sites is the same has having problems with a FEW and having problems with just a FEW means they work well with MOST, don't you think?
Anyway, I would say one of the first two. :)
|
09-06-07 06:05pm
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope. Multiple desktops (an idea unknown to most Windows users) protect well. Also, the 'stash' is locked behind a password-protected, encrypted file system. When I leave the computer, I always lock the screen as well.
|
08-31-07 10:03am
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I really like the idea of giving RSS feeds for various updates to the site, kudos. Unfortunately I will probably never use them. I use feeds in my every-day life for non-pr0n related matter, but would take too much time to set up other readers just for certain sites containing NSFW content.
So I suppose for the time being, I will just continue to visit the site often! :)
|
08-29-07 10:01pm
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I rarely ever get a multi-month contract unless I REALLY like the site or the multi-month offers a HUGE discount as apposed to just getting a one month membership.
|
08-29-07 09:57pm
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Getreal's Poll
I like to get a good variety of content. I never kept a solid membership for more than the initial payment (one month, three month, 6 month). I usually join a site, try it out, grab what content I can and move on. Sites I like I will usually get another membership to later on to see what new stuff has been added.
|
08-29-07 09:55pm
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
It does, for now. It seems to have hindered the 'shills' pretty well, as long as they don't find some another loophole.
|
08-24-07 05:35pm
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Linux :)
|
08-07-07 08:21pm
|
Reply
91
|
Russian Mistress
(0)
|
Reply of
djwolf's Comment
Look at the "Site Facts" section on TBP listing.
"First Listed: 05-17-05"
Added in 05, no updates since. The trial may have been available in 05, but not now. Limited time offer apparently.
If you are willing to join and give us a review...
:)
|
05-31-07 08:46am
|
Reply
92
|
Kat Young
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Reply
Most sites that do this I see no problem with it, but "I'm 21 ... and live near X" is false advertising. I am pretty sure the owners of the site could be taken to court over that.
|
05-31-07 08:42am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Definitely Abby Winters. Best overall value. Amateur content everywhere (even though the site does not seem like it), and many search/nav functions and a great design.
I have had memberships to all of the sites listed, but AW is the best.
VideoBox is nice in that you get hundreds of DVDs to download, but have a taste for more amateur/exotic stuff.
Hegre Art is nice, has beautiful models, but is mostly all images.
I would probably like it better if they had longer/more videos.
Matts Models is a nice site but lacks in a few areas. Also, the design does not appeal to me.
FTV Girls I love. The videos are awesome and so is the site, but then again it still seems too professional in style to me. If they didn't priss the girls up so much and use some fancy house so much it would appeal more.
|
05-31-07 08:33am
|
Reply
94
|
Kat Young
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
It's not that creepy. Any tracking software can narrow down to whatever the closest city is to you. When you connect to your ISP for internet, it assigns you an IP address and most give you a hostname. An example hostname: someisp.miami.fl.730.304.23.234
Usually your ISP name (sometimes shortened along with a location and your IP address are given). Pretty much any advertising company can associate hostnames with locations. I think mostly through masking. E.G. Filter anywone with 'miami' and/or 'fl' as being in Miami, Florida.
P.S. I am not too sure what your post has to do with this site in particular. Many models have setups now where they hold up a blank piece of paper and anyones city name can be printed on it by the server.
|
05-24-07 12:47pm
|
Reply
95
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom22's Comment
I agree. While I admire a site's willingness to prevent stealing/pirating of their videos, things like massive logos and DRM on their members content is really unacceptable.
A small logo that doesn't cover much, and is possibly semi-transparent is ok though.
|
05-13-07 08:26am
|
Reply
96
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Bo M's Review
I am always skeptical of a 100% rating. Not to mention that it would be nice if you followed the review guidelines. You should put your points for and against (pros and cons) in complete sentence with a dash before each sentence to better show each point. Also, "This chick is SO GREAT!!!" is an opinion that should have been thrown in the bottom line along with the explanations of your pros/cons. For instance, your pros focus only on her abilities, and the bottom line only focuses on updates. Here is an example to make it cleaner, just for future reference:
PROS:
- Great skills!
- Does great deepthroat blowjobs!
- A is what I like about site navigation. (EXAMPLE)
- The site as great video quality (900kb/s WMV/MPG/AVI). (EXAMPLE)
- Images are high-res (1600px+) (EXAMPLE)
CONS:
- Needs better navigation
BOTTOM LINE:
This chick is SO GREAT !!! Her skills in pleasing her man is like a dream and her soft body is really wonderful to watch. I especially love the way she gives head and how she deepthroats and keep the dick deep down her throat extremely long and makes me get nutts when imagining myself being treated by her.
Every minute with her must be really terrific !! She always keep her site very fresh and up-to-date. Maybe that is why it is a bit difficult to remember what you have checked or not. But the site is wonderful !!
You should also expand on the pros and cons in the bottom line, your entire review seems to focus on the model for the most part and barely states anything about the site beyond updates and a catch line to join a site that you did not explain very well.
Just for future reference, and to help out the others on the site. :)
|
05-13-07 08:18am
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Good idea! I would typically say it is a bad action to take if it weren't for the fact that you can browse back and answer previous polls! Since you can do this, it really defeats the purpose of updating the poll every day since any you miss you can go back and answer later. I'm sure you guys would have trouble getting a new question every day for all eternity anyway... :)
|
05-11-07 05:41pm
|
Reply
98
|
Ema's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
djwolf's Comment
I am skeptical not only because it is 100% rating but because it is a new site and has not had a chance to collect members yet. I will wait with this for a while to see what others say if more join.
|
05-10-07 02:15pm
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I love the new enhancements, except for one thing: I have seen people get rated bad with no reason why. People I would really put a good trust rating to many anonymously rate bad here and there with no comment. I think you should require a comment of X length (maybe 50 characters?) be attached when rating someone badly.
|
05-08-07 04:02pm
|
Reply
100
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Drooler, I agree. It is a ripoff. I was rather shocked seeing the 'UPDATED WEEKLY' banner on the site, but when I joined the 'updates' section shows no new updates since January 2006. That is false advertising for one thing, so they should have removed that banner if they still wanted to offer old content.
My guess is they packed up shop and left. If I could, I would get my money back as it is probably just sitting in an account somewhere.
Personally, as I said, I wouldn't join unless you just want to try to grab the old videos. They seem pretty popular elsewhere.
|
05-05-07 11:44am
|
