| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
Good idea! I would typically say it is a bad action to take if it weren't for the fact that you can browse back and answer previous polls! Since you can do this, it really defeats the purpose of updating the poll every day since any you miss you can go back and answer later. I'm sure you guys would have trouble getting a new question every day for all eternity anyway... :)
|
05-11-07 05:41pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Your News
I love the new enhancements, except for one thing: I have seen people get rated bad with no reason why. People I would really put a good trust rating to many anonymously rate bad here and there with no comment. I think you should require a comment of X length (maybe 50 characters?) be attached when rating someone badly.
|
05-08-07 04:02pm
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I keep in mind that they might be biased, but then again if a site is really bad (or really good) it has merit. I try to sort through ones that don't appear legit.
|
05-05-07 01:18am
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can't afford the bandwidth? Use P2P technology. It works. I think at this point ALL video should be at least full-screen TV quality MINIMUM. Sites that don't have this, I don't stay. DRM? No, just... no.
|
05-05-07 01:14am
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I am not into the matures as much, but there are many out there that are hot. I know a lot of people fantasize about that hot friend's mom.
|
05-05-07 01:12am
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Totem (mainly), Mplayer, or VLC. I use Linux. Period.
|
05-05-07 01:10am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Not a huge deal to me and even though I advocate safe-sex; I still prefer no condom for the creampies and I think it brings on this suspenseful "Is he ganna do it?" feeling (especially in homemade/amateur content).
|
05-05-07 01:09am
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Planning on switching to Cable. Would grab fiber the moment it gets here (if it ever gets here... listening AT&T???).
|
05-05-07 01:05am
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Don't have a portable device to watch it on.
|
05-05-07 01:04am
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If the site is reliable, I love to hear about updates to the site or content.
|
05-05-07 01:04am
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Firefox, best Linux browser. Before I switched to Linux, and before Firefox... if you are going use IE, I recommend Maxthon. It takes IE and adds Firefox-like plugins, interface, and tabs!
|
05-05-07 01:02am
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
WMV does not work well on linux. I prefer Xvid/Divx due to great quality for filesize, but will take quicktime or MPEG as well. Flash needs updated to compete. Will Silverlight bring that change?
|
05-05-07 01:01am
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Usually take a few days and look at similar offerings and completion to choose best offer.
|
05-05-07 12:57am
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It is VERY important to me. I would like to know at least about how often updates occur and that updates ARE occurring.
|
05-05-07 12:55am
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Lack of showing when updates occurred tips me off. At this point, if I can't see updates I have no reason to believe the site is even being updated.
|
05-05-07 12:47am
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
Its a classic way to increase traffic / interaction, but I have a feeling some will be reviewing sites whether they were a member or not just to get the points and tickets for the chance to win.
Although the 'trust rating' could help offset this, I would have liked it better if you charged per-review to get a ticket ($1 to enter?) just to further prevent false reviews.
|
05-05-07 12:44am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
peepee's Poll
Huge girl-gasm!
|
05-05-07 12:40am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Don't mind any of them, but lettin it go inside is the best!
|
05-05-07 12:38am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Don't care much for fully shaved. Don't mind the hair (any amount), but at least kept neat.
|
05-05-07 12:35am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Lack of updates, quality of content, and amount of content (based on age of site) determine if I keep a membership.
One of my major dropping points: video. Quality should be at least full-screen TV quality at this point. Can't afford the bandwidth? Adopt P2P.
|
05-05-07 12:11am
|
Reply
96
|
Brooke Skye
(0)
|
Reply of
s1vus1's Comment
If you could, please clarify your answer. Nothing has changed in term of design or no new content has been added?
|
03-26-09 08:09am
|
Reply
97
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
Tom22's Comment
I agree. While I admire a site's willingness to prevent stealing/pirating of their videos, things like massive logos and DRM on their members content is really unacceptable.
A small logo that doesn't cover much, and is possibly semi-transparent is ok though.
|
05-13-07 08:26am
|
Reply
98
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Drooler, I agree. It is a ripoff. I was rather shocked seeing the 'UPDATED WEEKLY' banner on the site, but when I joined the 'updates' section shows no new updates since January 2006. That is false advertising for one thing, so they should have removed that banner if they still wanted to offer old content.
My guess is they packed up shop and left. If I could, I would get my money back as it is probably just sitting in an account somewhere.
Personally, as I said, I wouldn't join unless you just want to try to grab the old videos. They seem pretty popular elsewhere.
|
05-05-07 11:44am
|
Reply
99
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Comment
While it is entirely possible that content on C4S may not be legal sold, it is difficult to realize who has that right. You have to consider that it may a Bangbros rep posting them or a third-party who has purchased the rights to the videos. It is really up to Bangbros or any other provider to keep track of that and, if necessary, file a copyright violation claim against a store owner. I am sure C4S has some kind of process for handling DMCA/copyright claims.
The most they can do in the short term is ask the store owner to remove any videos that were not sold legally or ban the user if they do not remove them after a short time. The only way a company can sue is if both the store owner and C4S does not reply or remove the clips within a certain period of time. Even still, considering it is the porn industry they usually do not sue since many courts still have a bias against the material they sell and many of them know that at least some level of stolen/distributed content actually brings in more customers.
|
08-01-09 07:29pm
|
Reply
100
|
Curvy Kitty
(0)
|
Reply of
Bo M's Review
I am always skeptical of a 100% rating. Not to mention that it would be nice if you followed the review guidelines. You should put your points for and against (pros and cons) in complete sentence with a dash before each sentence to better show each point. Also, "This chick is SO GREAT!!!" is an opinion that should have been thrown in the bottom line along with the explanations of your pros/cons. For instance, your pros focus only on her abilities, and the bottom line only focuses on updates. Here is an example to make it cleaner, just for future reference:
PROS:
- Great skills!
- Does great deepthroat blowjobs!
- A is what I like about site navigation. (EXAMPLE)
- The site as great video quality (900kb/s WMV/MPG/AVI). (EXAMPLE)
- Images are high-res (1600px+) (EXAMPLE)
CONS:
- Needs better navigation
BOTTOM LINE:
This chick is SO GREAT !!! Her skills in pleasing her man is like a dream and her soft body is really wonderful to watch. I especially love the way she gives head and how she deepthroats and keep the dick deep down her throat extremely long and makes me get nutts when imagining myself being treated by her.
Every minute with her must be really terrific !! She always keep her site very fresh and up-to-date. Maybe that is why it is a bit difficult to remember what you have checked or not. But the site is wonderful !!
You should also expand on the pros and cons in the bottom line, your entire review seems to focus on the model for the most part and barely states anything about the site beyond updates and a catch line to join a site that you did not explain very well.
Just for future reference, and to help out the others on the site. :)
|
05-13-07 08:18am
|
