| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Tia Ling
(0)
|
Reply of
tialing's Reply
Ah OK, still working my way through the site so it might be a coincidence that most of the stuff I've downloaded just happens to be the non-exclusive stuff from Evil Angel, Dog Fart, Mommy's Got Boobs, Brother Lover etc. Hope you appreciate that it's quite hard to tell without downloading, particularly with what I was saying about the previews.
Will be a member for a few more weeks yet, so will happily revise my review/score.
Hope you can take the other points in my review on board, it wouldn't take much at all for the score to be a lot higher in my opinion, especially separating the screenshots from the photoshoots and tidying up the navigation options :)
|
01-03-13 03:45pm
|
Reply
277
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I agree with the majority in saying nothing offends me, but I don't think swearing etc really adds much to a scene.
|
01-03-13 10:52am
|
Reply
278
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't. Don't see the point of waiting to New Year to turn over a new leaf or trying something new. Happy New Year everyone.
|
01-01-13 07:03am
|
Reply
279
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Two; Internet Explorer that came with the computer, and Chrome which I installed. Honestly, I'm not a huge fan of Chrome as it seems to lock up quite a bit.
|
12-30-12 01:49am
|
Reply
280
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
International M's Reply
Thank you for taking my feedback as it was intended, and happy to hear you're considering refining that page.
|
12-28-12 07:31am
|
Reply
281
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
International M's Reply
To be fair to potatohead, that page is quite misleading.
It says on there several times that the billing agent is Epoch and doesn't make any reference to VXSbill. I would have thought it would have said under billing on the left "If you joined via Epoch, click here, or if you joined via VXSbill, click here" as it makes it obvious that there are two billers.
I know it's mentioned on that FAQ page, but I must admit it wouldn't have necessarily occurred to me to look there, particularly as the Help page does imply there's only one biller.
Hope you don't think I'm having a go or ganging up on you, I just thought you might appreciate input from the point of view of a browser :)
|
12-28-12 07:04am
|
Reply
282
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Hopefully the webmaster will reply as I know they have replied to reviews before. Pre-ticked cross-sells are basically taking advantage of people not noticing the upsell so it isn't fair, really, but I'm pretty sure if I'm understanding correctly there is no more regional pricing.
|
12-28-12 06:16am
|
Reply
283
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Oh OK, that's odd! I was going by the prices on the CC Bill page - when I click the US flag it says $31.36 and when I click the Union Jack it says £20.44. Admittedly the previous join page without the local currency is not helpful.
|
12-27-12 11:27am
|
Reply
284
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
You're welcome. Still a pre-checked cross-sell unfortunately :(
|
12-27-12 10:03am
|
Reply
285
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Sometimes I'm happy and I feel it's a beginning of a new and exciting chapter. Sometimes my gut feeling is that it's the beginning of the end. You kinda get a sixth sense as to when it's 'right' for a model to go hardcore.
Ann Angel, for example, has been gradually working up to HC, and now has her new site and for me it seems a logical progression. She's not gone from being sweeter than sweeter than to taking it in every hole (!), she's gone HC but is still teasing and having fun along the way.
Some models, though, you kinda get the impression it's the wrong step for them, they go through the motions just to keep fans happy, then stop updating their website and go AWOL.
I've never been someone who complains when models don't go HC. I have softer tastes but love harder models like Tia Ling so have nothing against harder stuff.
But if a model is comfortable just doing nudes, I think it can border on disrespectful to expect them to go to the next level, and think it's unfair to pressure them into going hardcore.
So in this respect, I'm generally happy for the model, although there's always a bit of reservation and I always hope that they're making the decision because it's what THEY want to do, rather than what the FANS want them to do.
|
12-26-12 04:29am
|
Reply
286
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
About the same. More in some respects as I have time off work and some quiet days to myself. Less in other respects as on many days I am out and about or spending time with the family.
|
12-20-12 11:15am
|
Reply
287
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
720p for me, although 640x480 is adequate.
|
12-12-12 11:08am
|
Reply
288
|
Tia Ling
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I'm glad I'm not alone with being a bit scared by larger file sizes! It seems, though, the definition of what's too big varies which I guess is another argument for there being a few different options available.
The video length is about 20 min, and I dunno, I would prefer the file size to be around 250mb rather than 700mb. It feels funny to pick a site up on offering videos that are TOO good a quality, but it makes me appreciate sites like Chica's Place where there's so many options available that bit more :)
|
12-12-12 12:05am
|
Reply
289
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
I agree, I find the name borderline repulsive! It's like it's come from some random word generator where it pairs a type of animal with a bodily function.
|
12-11-12 01:44pm
|
Reply
290
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never have, and never really really felt the need.
|
12-10-12 03:25pm
|
Reply
291
|
N/A
|
Reply of
alexbrawn's Poll
Difficult one to answer for me. I generally don't sign up for trials unless I'm really on the fence about whether I'll like the site.
I think a lot depends on the size of the site. I can see smaller sites' reluctance to have a 3 day trial as let's be honest, most people would probably just rip the entire site, and I can completely understand why Webmasters don't want to make pirates' life any easier.
I prefer better preview sections with a clear, dated catalogue of updates and some indication of the quality members can expect inside. I think this is all I need for me to decide whether to join.
I think a 2-day trial is a reasonable length, though, 3-days is more generous. I think websites need to make it clear whether trials are all-access or not.
|
12-09-12 04:28am
|
Reply
292
|
Bryci
(0)
|
Reply of
Bonemaster's Reply
The webmaster of Bryci insists his system is infallible and that everyone here has not read the terms and conditions. Absolutely ridiculous, and although I'm sorry you've had problems too, I'm happy I'm not the only one to have problems.
|
12-07-12 10:21am
|
Reply
293
|
N/A
|
Reply of
t9chome's Reply
It's a poll, it's kinda the point to ask a question so people can have a discussion about it :)
Mine's all digital and kinda hidden. Nobody else uses the computer so it's just in an unobviously named folder somewhere. It's not so much hidden but not easy to stumble across.
|
12-06-12 01:50pm
|
Reply
294
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably 50/50 for me. I do love video because you get a sense of personality and can enjoy the model's technique a bit more maybe, but I completely understand people's point that with images you can just set up a slideshow etc of the bits you want to see so I like images for that reason, too.
|
12-04-12 11:02am
|
Reply
295
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Mainly number of updates, but if a new site, amount of content would be more of a factor. I'm not someone who downloads everything unless I'm obsessed with the model, so normally I can get through most sites and cherry pick for download what suits my tastes.
|
11-30-12 09:10am
|
Reply
296
|
Chica's Place
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
Thanks for the reply. Most of my review is the same as before, but the slower update schedule was an important aspect to update I thought, while the rest of the site is really good. I would love to hear your thoughts if/when you join :)
|
11-16-12 09:22am
|
Reply
297
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Wasn't really an option for me, but I suppose don't care was the closest to summing up my point of view. It's OK as a pre-amble to the main action but not something I either like/dislike.
|
11-16-12 08:31am
|
Reply
298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Part of the thrill for me is the journey, so definitely fully clothed. Love to see the model get undressed too, hate it when they're fully clothed, then in the next scene they're nude.
|
11-14-12 11:13am
|
Reply
299
|
Rachel Reveals
(0)
|
Reply of
wunhung's Review
You really need to post more detail in your reviews. I'm not sure what to think of the site as you say there's only 10 pictures per set, yet the webmaster says there's tens of thousands of pictures.
|
11-09-12 10:28am
|
Reply
300
|
Evil Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
tetros's Reply
I can see why a website would moderate comments, but I think reactive moderation would be better where the webmaster is notified of new comments published and can remove them if they're objectionable.
The strange thing is that looking at the reviews here, Evil Angel looks like a great website, so I can't believe they get much in the way of negative comments anyway.
|
11-07-12 11:21pm
|
