I finally remembered the name of the first site I joined. I joined it on a trial basis in 2002, it was one of those trials that says once you pay you get to see it all. I paid the trial, all I saw was her in a shower, covered with bubbles. I then joined the site, $30! She still didn't show it all! That site is Sweet Dominique. It is now part of a network that also has Brooke Skye's site on it. I don't think any of the sites update anymore. Damn tease.
Yeah, I had noticed the set on Mike's Apartment as well. It seems they get as many of the top Euros as any of the Euro sites do these days.
Cindy has definitely developed as a model. I have some content of her from 2005 or 2006 that is just plain boring, she doesn't "come off" as innocent, she really is innocent in those. She acts like she is scared to death.
Club Sandy pictures and the other 21st Sextury sites are still rolling out the 1280 high end pictures. They keep saying there is going to be a raise in the quality, but I haven't seen it yet. I will give them one thing though, they are bringing in some new models that are much better than the new ones the other Euro sites have. Oh and they have a new set of Cameron Cruz/Mona Lisa that just blew me away. She has cut her hair even shorter, but it is layered. Looks stunning on her.
I saw a new Cindy set recently on Club Sandy, had no idea Cindy was getting implants. They look okay if you haven't seen them yet, she looks to be a B cup now, so she didn't overdo it, but she does have two very visible scars and she is blonde in it. That surprised me even more. She kind of has a whole Christina Aguilera look in the set. The boob size difference is similar to when Sandy got her implants.
After reading the answers, I'm not for sure if the question is asking if I believe the models are under 19 and 18 or above. One of the best discussions we have had on here was awhile back about how we have to remember that some of the sold as "teen" models have aged since the content was made. A few examples, I still see Eve Angel being sold as a teen model, Twistys even has her age listed as 19. Yet, they have content of her that goes back 5-6 years. I believe Eve is 26 or 27, going by her birthday on her bio.
The other side is the models that just look young. Cindy Hope to me looks all of 18 or maybe 19, she is 23 or 24. Anetta Keys is another like Cindy, she looks 18 or 19 but is 25 or 26.
I joined that Party Hardcore site back a few years ago. It was 34 Euros at the time, so it ended up being over $41. I still will pay the higher prices, 1byday for $35 for example, but most that I join are under $25.
I have been told I have had mine shared with others by Teen Dreams and Club Sandy. Sadly, most sites start out like this, "We have suspended your account for sharing your login info with others."
So they automatically accuse you. Both of those sites, at the time I was supposedly hacked, had non-secure signups, not your payment information, but the username and password you sign up for. Similar to most sites on the internet, if you put information across a non-secure connection, there is a chance someone is going to be able to get it. To make matters worse, don't we all know those who do steal/hack others porn login are just sitting there on those sites with non-secure signups waiting to steal the login and password?
I remember years ago when yahoo had non-secure sign-in and sign-up, seemed like daily, I would have emails missing, even had one that left me a note to say hi. As of right now, I have updated AV, run super anti-spyware and malware byte's anti-malware daily, two-way firewall, and also use an external firewall that blocks even me from using my PC at times ha ha.
I just can't see how a computer with that much protection is more prone to being hacked than a simple non-secure signup page is.
Can't say I've tried these. Really can't say I would either. I remember one of the porn stars, can't remember which one was promoting a video of her using a Fleshlight on a man. My first thought when I saw the video and the Fleshlight was, "What if the son of a bitch doesn't let me go?" Too much concern of bodily harm to a very sensitive area! It makes me have a trip down memory lane to the Porky's movie where the one guy sticks his dick in the hole in the wall and the old woman teacher pulls it and won't let go.
I keep the whole thing. Kind of like that old saying about you can't enjoy the sunshine without having been rained on. Though there still are some facial expressions that have no business in porn like the overused, "oops, I'm naked" one. I like the blend of serious with a slight smile, for some reason, I take that as seductive. Eyes serious, lips smiling = magic!
I picked several weeks since there are weeks that I have to go out to the east coast and stay for 1-2 weeks. Sometimes I will take a portable hard drive with me, but usually don't. I have this strange feeling that the baggage handlers would start wondering why I always have a laptop AND portable hard drive! Plus, my wife would eventually yell at me if I looked at porn everyday and probably let her looks go! Hopefully she doesn't read that ha ha.
I don't mind any of these that much, though hairy can freak me out a bit, especially underarm and leg hair. The big one for me, I refuse to touch the scat/shit/puke content. I was surprised to see DDF's House of Taboo have enema content. I won't look at it, even if it has my favorite models in it.
I had it happen this past year, an older 500 GB WD My Book drive, clicked a few times, made a whistle noise and that was all she wrote.
On a side note, you all should check out the new Iomega Prestige externals. I picked a 1 TB up for $109, it is small, doesn't get hot at all and best of all, is pre-formatted to NTFS, I've since added another 1 TB and a 1.5 TB as well.
Just had to put Eve's name in there didn't you ha ha? Of course I voted for Eve. I do generally like the solo style sites, two of my favorites back in say 2007, were Eve's site and Mya Diamond's site. I have way too many accounts right now on sites, here is what I have, which to take into consideration that both Eve and Mya's sites have become recycling sites.
One site has a match the model's face to her pussy game, well, I missed all 8. Decided it was time to go look at those models a little more and never played the game again. Outside of that one, I haven't really even seen many sites with them.
I come by several times a day. I have a long lunch of 90 minutes and come by, then usually once I get home, my wife works from home and is usually on the phone so I come by and then usually around bedtime I come by. My problem right now, I seem to have finally stopped loving college football, thanks negative fans, so that gives me even more time to come by. I still have a forum that I keep up with that is mostly just friends, but we don't talk much on it, it is used more as a message board where we will post where we are going to lunch.
I'm giving up my normal movies. Sure, I have some great ones, but I'm playing fair here and letting one go instead of taking the "Can't choose" answer. My thinking is that with cable tv, I can at least still see some of those movies, but cable doesn't get porn!
I have been to a couple of them. One of the reasons, I searched google for a porn scene by file name and it took me directly to one of the tube sites that had it. Most of the content that I have seen on them is either old, easily attainable on the DVD sites or it isn't the full scene.
lk2fireone, I don't really want to promote them, but the ones I have seen have tube in the name and have the name of a color in front of tube and some are not so subtly just putting part of this site's name, the genre of movies in front of tube. I do think some of them are pretty legit since they look to allow websites to upload samples of their content and some even will have a full scene that says, "Compliments of" and tell the site's name.
I'm just a little concerned though with the security aspect of connecting to these sites.
See Carey, I had a feeling this was going to go this way.
First, you are not required to read my posts if you don't like them or if they are not rhetorical enough or too rhetorical for you and Demosthenes.
Second, you say to keep perspective. You submitted this poll question, and haven't even posted your stance on it. So, for you to say that you were not advocating babies in a furnace, really has no meaning whatsoever, you haven't advocated either side of this very topic! A few of the members even showed some curiosity towards the topic, but you still didn't expand on it, explain it, or give your opinion. The question also does not give your stance away.
Third, you submitted a poll question, meaning you wanted opinions on this topic. I gave my opinion and for whatever reason, you admit in this (#19) reply that you were being a bastard towards me because of my opinion, which must differ from yours, even though I had no clue what your opinion was, see your words, "You're the only one on PU permitted to be a bastard?"
Fourth, of my hundreds of replies, which you are of course free to skip over, I've never been called a bastard or thought I replied in other way except to be helpful or to joke around with the member I replied to.
Of course you aren't going to argue my 2nd post, you would prefer playing flame wars like we were in the 5th grade. If my stance on the point hasn't been clear, it is nothing more than a rule that nearly all businesses have. It asks soldiers to "Not tell your sexual preference and we won't ask". Now, somehow this became about gays, but the rule is saying no one tell, so it isn't just about gays, until the wonderful American media put their typical sensationalistic twist on it and made it into discrimination. Rosa Parks, Dr. King, Jackie Robinson and millions of others roll in their graves about what is considered discrimination these days in America.
Carey, you dummied down my entire post. The post is about sexuality, not gender and the situation was hypothetically asked, not something that was tried to be seriously passed.
In life, a male or female is based on their reproductive organs at birth. Over time, puberty strikes and sexuality is born.
Somewhere around this point, it is not okay for males and females to take showers together. It really isn't just because one has a dick and one doesn't. It is because of the possible bad situations that could come from it. Most likely, but not completely, based on the males possibly sexually assaulting the females.
Going by that, if a gay man, who is sexually aroused by naked men is allowed to stand in a room full of naked straight men and get his jollies, then it is no different, hypothetically, then a straight man standing in a shower room full of nude women, getting his jollies.
Oh and by pointing out gender, it does go against the very question that was asked since homosexuals blur the line that gender is defined by. A gay man is a man by gender because of his penis, but is attracted to the same things sexually that a female is attracted to.
I voted no. I voted based on experience. I don't think anyone should have any rights taken away based on their sexual preference, but that can work both ways in a military setting. I will post the experiences so you all can think about these.
A co-worker of mine came out of the closet a few years ago. No one treated him any differently. Breaks at work, he is still hanging out with us straight people, as he jokes about, and he gets all the rights we do. Nothing changes in this setting.
When in college, as a football player, two players came out of the closet to a couple of players, not all. It was a school in the deep south of the United States, and truth was, most everyone on the team "thought" they were gay, but never said anything. As word started spreading, problems started coming up. These two players were never picked on for being gay, one was a 290 pound Defensive Linemen with what we called a "Mean streak" so maybe that played a part in him not being made fun of, but the other one was small in build and he was never picked on either. We still would hang out after practice, grab a pizza and do everything we always did.
BUT when it came time for showers, things became uncomfortable. Some of the straight players would say they wondered if the gay players were looking at them, the gay players even said it made them uncomfortable because you could see that some of the straight players were uncomfortable being nude around the gay players and they didn't want to do that either by coming out of the closet.
It caused problems, and though I don't think most people would look at the situation and think anything about it, it is much different when put in that position. I remember one of the straight players even saying, "Would I be allowed to shower with the female cheerleaders?" and he had a good point. That would be seeing your sexual preference nude.
The military also has times like this shower time that could cause problems for the straight soldiers, so the compromise of don't ask, don't tell, to me, was a good one based on my experience in a very similar situation. Just a different view than what most would say.
I didn't know how to reply. High school crushes weren't really an option, most of them are in jail or had 12 kids. Spent most of my high school years at Dominguez, trust me 12 kids and jail was a good girl!
Not really many celebs come to mind, maybe Jessica Alba and Alyssa Milano in a Viv Thomas production?
I marked other, our neighbors are pretty, two UCLA college girls, but the last thing I need is to start feeling like an old pervert at 34, even though my wife says I am.
Other, my Philosophy professor in college. She was probably 40, I was about 21, and I might have just imagined this, but I could have sworn she once crossed her legs and had on thigh high stockings with garters! But she would now be around 60, so I really didn't have a sure answer.
I put "not for me". I think a big part of the interest in bondage and the very rough sites and their enjoyment of their viewers depends on how the viewer was raised, type of environment, etc..
Growing up in the Belly of the Beast, South Central, Los Angeles in the 80s, has turned me completely against most things that even approach violence. I still hear women screaming from being assaulted or finding their son with his head blown off, so I have trouble with any site that could even start to make me think the woman is in any pain.
And similar to what Jay G says, I don't ride thrill rides, I've never bungee jumped or sky dived. As a kid, I used to have to go to the pharmacy to get my grandfather's diabetic medicine, and it was a run for my life most of the time. Kid carrying a $50 bill in an impoverished neighborhood filled with crackheads with guns.
Once we moved out of there, I never looked for an adrenaline thrill again. Having said that, I have joined several of the kink.com sites, and do like their content, I'm not even for sure that it falls in much more than very light bondage though.
Sitting right on 85, I'm using something similar to a college professor using a grading curve. I've only reviewed 2-3 sites below 70 out of 150 or so sites, so I have 70 as my low mark, the few I have graded below 70 was because of serious issues like false advertising about content in preview. So, my scores tend to fall between 70-100, and 85 is right in the middle. I remember explaining once that most of the sites I have reviewed here are sites that I've been a member of more than once, so I obviously liked the site enough to join a second time, so I recommended it to myself. And the only way I take risks on sites is if they have content of one or two of my favorite models, which in turn means it will most likely score at least around 80.
I wouldn't have a problem wearing a t-shirt with TBP or PU logo on it. I'm usually in California or Florida, Florida might freak out in the northern areas, but shouldn't be a problem at all in California.
We see people wearing funny sexual shirts all the time. This girl was buying some gas, when I noticed her bumper sticker, "My other car is a Sybian" to the more obvious shirts "Yes, those are boobs and they are real" to the ever funny liberal crossdressing men, "Real Men Wear Crotchless Panties" and my favorite of all, I saw a man, probably 70 or older with a shirt on that said, "College Girls > Viagra"
Most of my technical knowledge comes from my porn collection. Remember when they used to say the internet was invented for 2 things, education and porn? Killed two birds with my stone.
If I am on our powerful computer with the big monitor, the higher resolution and higher bitrate is very important. Try watching a 320 high end video clip in full screen on a 1920 resolution monitor.
I always looked at the bitrate as being similar to frame rate. The problem is, it runs in a ladder like progression. The higher the bitrate/resolution is, the more advanced computer you need to truly enjoy it, and the more hard drive space you need to store it.
I was blown away by the new Give Me Pink videos, those are 1920 high end, 8000+ bitrate, and the files are right at 2 GB each for a 30 minute video. On our powerful computer, the videos are crisp, as nice as I have seen, but if I put the video on our older laptop, it struggles with the fast bitrate and large resolution, I assume the RAM isn't high enough and the video card isn't powerful enough.
Going by that, I think the information from a site before joining could be useful since some people might not have a computer powerful enough to get full use of a 1920 and 8000 bitrate video. Then it would be nice for those that do, so they would be interested more since it would use their computer's power fully.
Personally, my favorite combination as far as quality, size, speed is the 960x540 resolution, around 4000 bitrate. Those files are 600-650 mb in size and are big enough in size and speed to be good enough quality without the 2 GB hit on the hard drive.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
