Hey, Eve's site was updated last night and caught back up. They did this same thing last year. I don't know if it is vacation time or what, but I too was getting frustrated. I'm starting to think that Eve is working too much. Look at these July stats for her. On her site alone 30 updates with her in them in 31 days, 2 sets on xisty pics and videos, a new full length feature for vivthomas, a set for cruising girls, a set for only3x and I believe a new met-art set was in July. That is 42-44 sets for July alone. I don't think many realized how many she had in July on her site, I've never seen so many updates of just Eve. Even this month, there are already 2 Lora Craft ones, so August already is guaranteed to have less Eve than July. I'm pretty sure thinking back that it was July/August last year when the first drop-off happened. Because I had cancelled Eve's membership in July, then came back in September and hadn't cancelled since then. Oh and that live support thing doesn't work. I've never seen anyone answer it.
I thought you would like her! Eve has done some videos with men back 4 years ago or so. There are different stories about why she doesn't do sets with men anymore. Her first video had this old, fat, hairy guy doing anal with her. Some say that it made her sick. After that, she never made a good movie with a man. By herself, she is better than most women are with men. She is shy, seriously. Her interviews show that she wanted to be a fashion model when she was younger, but people told her she was too fat to be a fashion model. All of her dreams were gone. Her last chance was to do the movie with the fat, old guy. Now, it is almost like she refuses to do anything with a man on camera. I think she has 5 or 6 movies over the years with men. She never looks happy in those movies. Most sites even took the movies down because they are boring. With herself and even with other women, she is as good as a model can be.
I found her by accident. Was just looking up models a few years ago and seen some free pictures of her. I've been a member on her site since last September, never cancelled. Just be sure to get the TBP special price of $14.99, that makes the deal even better.
Pinche, I believe you would especially like her. For one thing on her solo site she has probably 8-12 bath/shower sets of pictures and a movie from each. All together on her site she have over 130 videos just of her. She is very pretty, not too skinny, has nice thighs and butt, maybe average or better boobs. Long dark hair. The only thing she doesn't have on her site is sex with men. She is by herself or with another woman, but when she masturbates, you know when she orgasms. I've read everyone from Sandy of ClubSandy to Sandra Shine say that Eve is the most realistic maturbation model on the internet. Her site has a full tour that looks you look at the 2+ years of content. It hasn't been updated since last week, but there are over 700 updates on it since it started. eveangel dot com.
Interesting question, I think you have to consider price to some extent. I like to compare everything I do in life to other things to put them into perspective. If I spend $10 on a hamburger, I'm going to expect it to be better than one for $2. I try to at least follow some of the groundwork laid by the TBP reviewers and one of their grading scales that figures up a score is, "value". I know I sound like a walking advertisment for Eve Angel's site, but if I paid $30 a month for it like it normally is without the TBP discount, I don't think I would score it as high as I do.
For example, right now, something has happened on Eve's site, my guess is she is on vacation, it happened last year as well around the holidays, no updates in nearly a week, it is supposed to be a daily updated site, but since the price is low, I know I can let it go another month if need be and the two months will only be what one site normally would cost for one month.
I prefer CCBill and Paycom, I haven't had one problem out of either. I have used NetBilling as well, but I'm not real fond of their cancellation system, it is usually somewhere in small letters on the actual site. I like going to CCBill or Paycom, clicking cancel subscription then receiving the email that says it has been cancelled. You don't get that with netbilling, they may send a confirmation one time, but not the next. The worst part about the other billing services is that you can't put your member ID in to see that it is cancelled in their system like on CCBill or Paycom. Last, CCBill and Paycom also have your password and username on their site in case you lose them, so you don't have to wait for the site to email your info.
Depends on what you call, "surfing". Usually what I do is go on a site that I'm a member of, open up a task on the PC that I need to work on and start loading the D/L manager. So, I'm going to say 1-2 hours since I don't really look at the sites that much, instead, download the content I know I want for the first few weeks, then once done doing that, I will go back and scan the site to see what I have missed. Then, like with Eve Angel's site, I have all of her content on it downloaded, so I only need to sign in and download the newest update. If I get bored I will go by freeones or tiavas TGP site and check for some new models that I haven't seen.
NYGiants03, don't see it as obsessed, see it as, "Getting your money's worth"!
I don't see why not. Most of the models that get married end up leaving the industry or becoming strictly solo. Even so, it almost goes into the whole thing would you date the person you are with if you knew their whole sexual past? I'm married, but if not, I can name off a dozen or so models that I would marry, not just date!
Just think, if she was a tease, you could be all like, "Well fine, don't show me, I will just go rent your last movie!"
My PC itself has a 300 GB HDD with it, then I have two Seagate 250 GB External HDD and one 500 GB Western Digital My Book HDD. The external ones are almost all porn, maybe 100 GB of the PC one is porn. This doesn't count the 50-75 DVDs that I have burnt of mostly Eve Angel's material.
Eventually, I will buy a couple 1TB Externals, then transfer and delete the material on the smaller ones before selling them. I'm not as bad about saving everything I download now though. I have a list of models that give consistently strong performances that I save and don't delete.
I voted other. I just can't see telling anyone that their opinion or understanding of numbers is worse than mine. What I would like to say though is this. When I first joined, I noticed the score key, 90-100 said "best of class". I have written most of my reviews with that in mind.
For example, I rate Eve Angel's solo site a 97, there are few people that based on sheer numbers could disagree that her site is the best solo site on the internet. She has over 2 years of daily updates, $15 a month, and 75% or so of the material is of her. Which to me is the definition of a solo site. Where as her General Entertainment sister site Mya Diamond has much more friends content than Eve's has. So with Mya being the only real competition based on numbers, quality, price, I rate Eve a 97, Mya a 93.
Both of those scores are higher or as high as my score for Twistys, PixandVideo, ClubSandy and 1byday, but that doesn't mean I think Eve's solo site is better than those. It means for what Eve's site is, a solo site, it is the best. But how could anyone possibly compare a site that has less than 20 models to a site that has hundreds?
I don't see Twistys, P&V, CS or 1by, being that much better than the other, so I rate all 4 a similar score, all 4 over 90, but not in the high 90s since I don't think one stands out when compared to the others. One more comparison, I scored Pier and Euro Glamour Girls over those 4 I just listed, but I don't think they are better, I just think they are the best in the glamour group. See what I mean?
It would be like comparing an economy car to a sports car, the sites have a niche they compete against. You wouldn't compare a Toyota Corolla to a Mercedes, instead a Toyota Corolla to a Honda Civic. Maybe that is just me, but I would really expect to see more high scores if we are supposed to grade on this type of curve.
Maybe I'm just confused? Wouldn't be the first time!
I click the links. I think this may be a security question, not for sure though. Remember those old TGP sites where you would click on the hot picture of the woman that says, "See the whole set" but the link would take you to one of those sites that tries to load software/adware/spyware and even viruses to your computer? I still click the links mainly because half of the sites if typed wrong take you to those sites with the nasty adware/spyware/viruses too.
I don't think the anonymous part is that important, as it is that a comment is left if they vote no. I just picked up my second no vote today and no comment was left, just like the last no vote, no comment was left.
Also both no votes that I received came within a week each of giving a site a low score. I think I have gave 2 low reviews and have 2 no votes. Odd coincidence or could it be a webmaster from those sites?
The best way to make it truly fair would be to not let new members vote, until they have 5 or so experience points just like they don't get raffle tickets until then. I wonder how many of the no votes come from someone reading a review that they didn't like, sign up, click no, then never come back?
Another option would be to remove the no vote all together. For example, I have 18 yes and 2 no, are those no votes really going to effect how someone looks at my reviews? Where the no vote is a problem here is when you ask if the people even understand why they are voting no? My guess is that most do it because someone scored their favorite site low.
Continuing on removing the no vote completely. The members who have been here the longest and put up dozens of reviews. Does that alone not say that we are trustworthy and not just someone posting a review to either hype our favorite site or put down a site that we don't like? Also, I would expect that the trust vote from most members is based on the scores we give sites. In which case, this goes into everyone having an opinion, and that we are going to disagree about what content on a site is good, and what isn't. The trust should come from whether a review is factual in its content, not whether a person agrees that Site X is an 81.
Last, if a person had been a member on here for 2 months and had 0 yes votes during that time, wouldn't that be warning enough for those reading their reviews? Just a different view on this topic. The only arguments I have seen between members on here was because of no votes. Anytime people, especially Americans (I am American) are given the chance to kick someone, a few will take that oppurtunity just because they are negative. The no vote also could be seen as what may hurt the site in terms of becoming a community. Communities are rarely built when negativity is allowed in.
I picked 100%! I didn't look at it like the raffle winners, since U.S. best option is Amazon on the raffle. I use the Amazon certificates that I have won on porn users for buying either music or gifts. Kind of funny, the first time I won one, I bought my mom a purifier for Mother's Day with it, off of Amazon. Bought several cds on the other ones, including ones I hadn't bought newer remastered versions of, like the old Ramones cds or the remastered Clash cds.
But if I won $100 cash, I'd figure it wasn't my money in the first place so I might as well spend it all on something like porn! If I get lucky and win a raffle again in the future, I'm going to invest it in something to help my porn collection, a new external hard drive ha ha! I've got two Seagate 250GB full already. Now the 500GB ones have dropped in price.
Once upon a time my friends, once upon a long time ago!
I'm at that point with Snowdude, I really don't want to see myself naked in a movie these days. On a side note, there can be good uses with filming yourself. You and your partner watch and notice which positions seem to get her hips moving more or the sad one, which positions she looks bored in.
I'm sort of concerned about seeing raw pictures of some of my favorites! I hear that a certain glamour, busty model with a last name meaning "Gift from God" in Italian has to have some touch-ups sometimes for hair above her facial lips. Just a rumor maybe, but I don't want to risk that. I would hope they don't start cutting the meat off the bones. I've found a real attraction to a model named Lucky, believe Lucy on some sites and I think even as Andrea on other sites, that has a bit of a pouch on her stomach, but she looks incredibly sexy to me...at least.
Even Eve Angel and that other one I mentioned at the top have gained some weight over the years. I'm pretty sure I've looked at them enough that any imprefections are looked over anyhow, though facial hair may be pushing it lol!
On the other hand, I don't mind the sites that airbrush. I guess it could be excessive on sites, but most look more like the women have been laying in tanning beds all day.
I voted yes, and want to add something in here. If a site doesn't offer a trial, then they should have a reduced monthly price, if not, then they should have a minimum of one free video preview. Maybe less than 5 minutes on the free video and 20-30 free (same resolution as members get) pictures.
The General Entertainment sites don't offer trials, but each of them have discounted prices through TBP for $15 a month and their top 2 sites, Eve Angel and Mya Diamond both have hundreds of video clips and picture sets. I have noticed that more of the full access trials are getting higher in price. The good thing, most of those are 5-7 day trials as well, instead of the just waiting to hit me with a charge because I can't get the billing company to cancel in 2 days trials.
Last, the site that goes through my mind when reading this poll and the comments is Annette Dawn's personal site. It says exclusive, the numbers are probably up to double digit pic sets and video sets by now, but it is priced at $24.99. It would be a shame for such a beautiful model not to ever get her own site going because of the person over her site starting the price too high and offering no preview.
Ha Ha! I have yet to write a review that didn't suddenly stop and pop up, "Must limit text to 1500 characters" the strange thing is, I have had several that say 12 characters left or 15 or even 2, but these still say I need to shorten it. I don't know if we need that many more characters, but a little more would be nice.
Hey that is in my neck of the woods! I will see if I can't schedule a "meeting" and swing by, between porn and daytime Dodger games, I'm scheduling lots and lots of meetings!
I think Pink Panther hits on something that I think is more important than just the date of the review. For example, most of the sites I have reviewed on here are sites that I have been on for either more than one month straight or sites I join every 3-4 months. Sometimes I forget to mention in my reviews that I've been a member before, unless they are noticable changes since the last time I was a member or on the other hand, no changes that could mean the site isn't improving itself much.
The best example of this is xisty, I went to it a few weeks after my subscription had ran out, they had changed the entire look of the site, better colors, better and more noticable search features etc..
One of the things that I thinks shows in the replies is that we have some newer and older users of the internet. When anyone mentions privacy, think about this, no one really knows if anyone is being honest in their profiles anyway. I even left my email public, it has actually caused a few people to email me, and ask me about this model or that model.
I also think putting my occupation for example, I also all but give away the state I live in, but as of right now there are over 200,000 people in this state with the same job I do. Talk about trying to find a needle in the haystack.
On a side note, I received my first no trust vote, anonymous and no comment. Which is my only real problem with the anonymous vote, at least leave a comment if posting no anonymously. If not, there is no way for me to improve my reviews. I know that the yes votes I have left, I left anonymously, at least most of them. But that is mainly because it is me saying nothing needs to be changed.
Last, I have heard from a few who have said my scores seem a little high. After reading over the grade key, I wouldn't change my scores, if anything, I may have been a little low on a few. 80-89 according to the key is needing improvement in a few key areas, but would still recommend. I don't have many clunker sites since I'm mostly into glamour/softcore with a little hardcore thrown in. The sites I have reviewed are almost all my 2nd or 3rd time being a member on them.
I see that as being an 80 minimum. If I'm willing to give a site a second or third visit that would mean I recommend it to myself enough to join again.
Squirting is real to a point. Most women who can squirt, have had babies and studied Kegal exercises. If you ever watch a video where a woman squirts you will see the muscles, just below the belly button flexing. This presses against the bladder just like when a woman has a baby, and sometimes pees on herself.
The really big straight line squirts are a mixture of an orgasm and peeing. One of the most realistic ones I have seen, I believe it is part of the brainpass network, Real Squirt, from what I remember it is the same woman in almost every video. Can't remember her name, very pretty, blonde. She has one in her car in a public parking lot. She squirts, one part hits the windshield, one part hits the other seat, those type of squirts look more realistic.
Just like a guy isn't likely to cum in one continous line of squirt, it isn't likely a woman would either, unless part of it was pee. It is for the most part, a matter of getting pressure built up inside the woman. Like when you see a woman having a baby and the doctor says, "Deep breath, breathe in, now push" she is building pressure. I'm not 100% sure on this, but I would think any woman that is secure in being naked and pushing on her body, would be able to at least squirt a little. I prefer the small squirts like on FTV or the "dripping" wet in any movie.
I'm not really into the cum swallowing, but it is mainly because of a few videos that I have watched that feature that guy Steve, older porn star and Max Hardcore. They kind of ruined it for me. There are exceptions, but most of the models do not look happy about swallowing. A big part of my turn on is seeing that the woman is really into what is going on. Once she frowns, it ruins the scene for me. The Steve guy I mentioned, he disgusts me, I saw one where he smacked Eva Angelina, then choked her. I also hear that the once legend Rocco is doing these same things in his latest videos.
Growing up in and around L.A. I saw way too many women forced to do things they didn't want, plus, with my job being in Psychology, I have to counsel many women who have been forced to do things as well.
Look at it this way, when was the last time you saw an established porn star swallow? You rarely do. Instead, it is the younger models who are trying to make a name for themselves. They are in that spot that if they say no, they are probably afraid they will lose any future job oppurtunities. The Eva Angelina one stood out to me because from everything I have seen of her she really loves sex and loves being cummed on. She even smiles during facials or body shots and laughs a little. But she did not look happy when she had to swallow because the guy was choking her. I have seen some though where the girl says she wants to swallow and looks to be truthful about it, those are a turn on. It is a few aging male pornstars that are ruining it. Just like everything else, a few bad apples ruin it.
This might be #1 on my list of pet peeves in porn. Especially when most of the sites use alphabetical order listings, at least use the same first letter of the first name. Some examples.
Eve Angel, at worst on other sites she is known as Eva, which Eva is her real name. She has some early career movies as Severine and I think one or two as Katie, but those are DVD's not sites.
Then there is Veronica, the beautiful blonde Euro star, I've seen her use a few other names, but each start with a V as well.
Then you have these messes. Zafira is listed a Brinette or something like that on teen dreams. Sandra Shine is listed by a way off name. I have noticed teen dreams probably has the biggest amount of different names stars than any site.
In a review I did of xisty, the webmaster replied and told me that they have no control over this. It all depends on what name the woman uses with them. It is odd though, you rarely see any of the American models by different names.
I've never seen a cam show. I think I visited that cam network one time where all the model does is tease you with a bunch of guys typing in, "Show your boobs!" over and over. Then she replies, "Go private with me and I will" Not really for me. Though I would pay $30 a month to make my wife be quiet! J/K
I first came to the best porn by doing a search for, "Best Porn Reviews" I didn't know there was a site named "The Best Porn" until then. Then the specials really got my attention, especially since one was a half off my favorite site, Eve Angel. Honestly, I'm much more likely to try a site that I think I might like if TBP has the special on it. The reviews are about as good as a review can be.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
