| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
76
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
It's probably going to be about the same: pics and vids. Maybe some more 3-D stuff but no game changers until virtual reality and holograms get good. Looking back 10 years ago, we didn't have large networks and vids were still in their infancy (at least size-wise) and we didn't have zips but not a lot has changed in my mind anyway.
|
08-13-13 03:25pm
|
Reply
77
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Mostly but that's because of security issues (not including the NSA of course), not convenience. It still irks me that I have to keep several browsers on hand because of the frequency in which porn sites seem unable to accommodate Firefox or other non MS Exploder browsers.
|
07-26-13 11:58am
|
Reply
78
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I agree that personal info is far more worrisome than a hard drive full of cracks and cleavage. I doubt there are many techs who haven't seen a machine full of porn and I assume that most of the time if they are rescuing a hard drive they're not really paying attention to contents: put the download on auto pilot and go do something else. The cost of trying to save a drive can be pretty expensive so I'd probably just go with the important nonporn stuff and focus on rebuilding the collection later; you'd probably save money doing this but not time.
|
07-18-13 02:18pm
|
Reply
79
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably not for another decade which I assume is about how long for 3-D to get realistic and of high quality without all the expensive extra gear. It's pretty much a novelty act right now.
|
06-26-13 12:24pm
|
Reply
80
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
I don't know what it means, we should ask the Dos Equis Most Interesting Man in the World as I'm sure he's faced multiple fates worse than death .... but did he like it?
|
06-06-13 08:12pm
|
Reply
81
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I said "other" because it's probably all of the above. I've seen examples of all of the above in the forum in the past. My guess is that for a woman to openly be a woman here (I suspect some join under a male or gender neutral name) requires more effort and bother than what it's worth.
|
05-09-13 11:57am
|
Reply
82
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I hate to admit it but the internet has ruined my reading. I used to read books all the time but now it's almost like I get bored reading more than a few pages. Damn you internet articles! Where did my ... (pause) ... attention span go?
|
05-03-13 12:59pm
|
Reply
83
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
But why have the real thing when you can shack up with a sexbot; a perfect 10 looks-wise that will do anything and everything in bed and then clean the house, cook dinner and mow the yard without complaining a bit?
|
03-26-13 12:33pm
|
Reply
84
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
Roku will probably be made obsolete once Apple and Microcrap get into the home tv market. I don't have one but I foresee most of us having some version of one in the coming decade as tv and the web become more seamless ... like the latex body suit I'm wearing ... oops, too much information again ;)
|
02-18-13 11:15am
|
Reply
85
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Whatever man, age is just a number. When I get old and messed up I figure I'll just be moving into my prime envy years (just no comments on how soon they'll be here). When I get old and arthritic people will be saying ....
- He's got alztheimers but forgot to give a fuck.
- Spends his pension on cocaine and hookers just to make Charlie Sheen look bad.
- He's forced to breathe through a tube ... when he fires up his bong.
- I just saw him and he was pushing 90 ... mph.
- He's so old he has broken joints ... in his front and back pockets.
- He needs to take his pills daily ... PCP and Viagra.
And when they bury me my epitaph will read "He died peacefully in his sleep; it was just his passengers that were the ones screaming."
|
05-06-12 09:24pm
|
Reply
86
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'm still clinging to xp and probably will until my machine finally gives up the ghost. Most of these OS are really interchangeable for the average user so it's really just a question of how hard some of us want to hang onto our old programs that won't work on the newest whiz-bang stuff or the fact that we just use what came loaded on our box.
|
04-02-12 10:58am
|
Reply
87
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
What is this thing called "friends"? I don't know what that means ;)
|
03-21-12 12:06pm
|
Reply
88
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Let's see, we're half way through March and I've singed up for one site so far this year. Yeah, definitely gonna have to go with a this being a downer type year. Maybe if I start doing more meth fueled porn binges I'll finally pump up stats here ... man, hate to see what that would cost.
|
03-18-12 08:58pm
|
Reply
89
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I'm a mix. I don't use it much during the weekends so it tends to get powered down then but otherwise I'll leave it running M - F unless I know I won't be on it for at least 12 to 16 hours.
|
03-15-12 11:14am
|
Reply
90
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
The simple answer, all of them.
|
03-13-12 01:03pm
|
Reply
91
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not to crush TheSquirrel like a piece of roadkill but I also voted for the status quo. Two days keeps it new and interesting. You can also go back and look at previous polls and add votes / comments later on (I sometimes do) so you still have access, you just have to make few more clicks of the mouse.
|
03-07-12 11:45am
|
Reply
92
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Cost, Content (original), & Reviews.
|
02-10-12 11:00am
|
Reply
93
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As far as I can tell, there are really only 3 reasons for having DL limits:
1. Excuse not to upgrade technology / save costs. For sites, having a DL limit means they don't have to spend as much in server and bandwidth fees. I could see this being a reason for the small time players or newbies but not the large sites where we most often find limits.
2. DRM version 2.0. I think most sites figure if your downloading gigs per day then your just ripping their site of all content and that must mean you're up to no good (piracy, selling it to others, illegal tube posts, etc.).
3. We want more of your money. Having DL limits means if you really like the content then you're going to have stay around a while to get it all meaning more membership fees. Of course, if they had regular updates and good content that's usually reason enough for most people to buy a multi-month membership.
As you can see, I'm not terribly impressed by any of the reasons for limits. Thus, I'll continue my practice of avoiding these types of sites even though any reasonable DL limit would probably never apply to me because of fine and discriminating tastes in what I DL :)
|
01-11-12 11:17am
|
Reply
94
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's one of those things that doesn't come up very often but if it turns out to be a negative experience for the customer (me) than I'll seriously think about it before signing up again regardless of how much I like the content.
|
01-09-12 11:51am
|
Reply
95
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Most of the time it's not done very well (as others have said). It can be good for solo shots where there is a decent striptease but most of the time it doesn't cut the mustard ... especially when your eating your hotdog on the 4th of July and come across one of these scenes in your archive.
|
12-19-11 03:49pm
|
Reply
96
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I say no. How is this different from phone sex only you get the visuals as well.
|
12-19-11 03:36pm
|
Reply
97
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Even though most countries will probably get stricter, they'll be stricter in name and lacking in enforcement. In the US I think you'll see fewer obscenity cases as prosecutors finally figure out you can watch a chick being sodomized with (insert your object of choice here) anywhere in the world with the click of a button and as people who have grown up with internet porn get older and actually consider voting as opposed to just wondering what the concept is.
|
12-16-11 03:43pm
|
Reply
98
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think I've looked up about 3 or so. The only one I ever came across that could even be classified as decent was the Tommy Lee / Pam Anderson one. Frankly, I doubt anyone's sex life looks hot or interesting unless you're doing a porn shoot ... just wait until my hc vid hits the net.
|
11-18-11 08:48pm
|
Reply
99
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I said "other" because I've tried some of them but not all of them. Basically I learned that if you're messed up porn just ain't that interesting because your equipment is messed up or your brain ain't working, although the latter is a constant problem with me.
|
10-24-11 11:02am
|
Reply
100
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I didn't know they existed either. I went back and looked at some but almost no commentary. I guess I'm just that damn good ... or else Khan and company actually have more important things to do (take your pick).
|
10-15-11 03:10pm
|
