| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
None of those are problems for me. In fact none of the sites I have a membership with or had a recent membership doesn't need to change anything.
The only thing I would like more of is scenario driven porn but with a better script, better acting and longer premise.
|
05-16-17 11:07am
|
Reply
227
|
Cathy's Craving
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
I'm not sure where you saw the info regarding a rebuilding of Cathy's site because as far as I know it pretty much stopped updating with new content a few years ago and is mostly re-releasing older video as new stuff. At least that's what I saw in 2013 and nothing I saw when I visited her site recently makes me think that it's any different.
|
05-15-17 05:28pm
|
Reply
228
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
No because a routine means that I follow some kind of schedule and frankly my viewing and downloading habits are too random.
|
05-14-17 10:48am
|
Reply
229
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
No but then again humiliation of any kind is a big turn off for me and cuckold porn falls under that category.
|
05-13-17 10:41am
|
Reply
230
|
N/A
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Poll
I precede internet porn by a few decades so if it should somehow no longer be available on the net then I would go back to the way I used to get it and that's buy it in adult shops. Once upon a time there was such a thing as adults shops who catered to porn fans. It's only been in the last 15 odd years that the internet has pretty much killed that part of adult shops. These days adult shops need to cater to other markets than porn to survive.
|
05-10-17 06:22am
|
Reply
231
|
DogFart
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
There is no way I can't join at least 2-3 times a year. I'm a past member so I often get special offers and the last one was for a 4 month membership at 10$ per month so I had to join.
If you like hardcore porn and like interracial than you have to join Dogfart.
|
05-09-17 06:32pm
|
Reply
232
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I don't know if sick is the word I would use but there have been times when I didn't care too much about porn.
|
05-08-17 05:59pm
|
Reply
233
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It depends on the scene. In some it can be quite important while in others it's not.
|
05-06-17 08:41am
|
Reply
234
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
No and I plan to never use one. The last thing I want to think about before I have sex with someone is how many people before me has she had sex with on that day.
|
05-04-17 10:39am
|
Reply
235
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
The question is do you pay for those non-sex related chats? It's one thing to enjoy talking to different people about various subjects but it's quite different thing if you have to pay cam prices to do those chats. I've always believed that the main attraction of cam shows is the implied intimacy you have with the model(s). The reason I say implied is because ultimately the relationship is never one of equal footing because at it's core it is primarily driven by money. You pay them and they talk to you. That doesn't mean that a certain rapport can't be built over time but unless the interaction jumps from a cam setting to a more
|
05-03-17 09:19am
|
Reply
236
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I have watched the odd cam show over the years and I've come to the conclusion that it's the kind of porn that doesn't appeal to me. I don't like solo content and unless I am seriously mistaken than the bulk of cam shows are basically solo model masturbation stuff.
|
05-02-17 07:43am
|
Reply
237
|
Holed
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
For me it's not just that 10 seconds loud promo clip but the entire music filled sort of solo stuff that annoys me. It's so different from the rest of the video that it feels sort of added on as opposed to being a well thought out idea. That said I do like some of their other sites but not enough to dish out an extra 70$ US to get access. Even less so now that the exchange rate is pretty bad between the US dollar and Canada.
|
05-01-17 06:40pm
|
Reply
238
|
Holed
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think it's a great deal that you can get a Platinum membership for an extra 70$ above your existing membership and that will give you access to 10 plus sites but you only find out about that deal once you have already joined Holed and if you have joined any of the other sites than the deal gets less and less appealing.
I also think that it's great that they hire some really hot models but their shooting style leaves a lot to be desired. In fact many of their other sites have significantly better content that Holed and I can't believe that the loud obnoxious 10 second advertising promo at the beginning of each of their videos doesn't annoy the shit out of you.
Do you truly believe that Holed is as good as you claim if you look at it as a stand alone site?
|
04-30-17 07:14pm
|
Reply
239
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I already know more about the porn industry than I care to so working on a porn set would probably turn me off porn forever.
|
04-30-17 10:11am
|
Reply
240
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I don't watch reality TV. In fact I go out of my way to avoid it in any form.
|
04-28-17 06:25pm
|
Reply
241
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
I only watch it when I'm home but I don't have a particular time set aside for it.
|
04-27-17 06:05pm
|
Reply
242
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Since I prefer feature movies than it stand to reason that I would favor the full movie but as long as I get the choice of having the entire movie or in a clip format I won't complain.
|
04-24-17 03:15pm
|
Reply
243
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
2016 was a horrendous year for new movies and 2017 isn't looking all that much better. That said I will definitely go see Guardians 2 and unless the critics a terrible than I will also go see The Mummy because Tom Cruise tends to always offer decent stuff. Not mentioned but I am a huge fan of Valerian and Laureline comics so I really want to see what Luc Besson can do with the material. There is also the next Star wars movie but that's almost in 2018.
|
04-22-17 04:32pm
|
Reply
244
|
Teens Boys World
(0)
|
Reply of
merc77's Review
I'm not into gay porn so I can't really comment on the content but this site has never gotten great scores with their reviews so that although the content may hold a certain level of appeal. I'm sure there are far better sites with similar content. if you look at Taylor's 2008 review. You will see that he also hoped the site would improve.
You mention that the site is recycling older content and using it as new stuff but do you know if they have remastered their older content or they are simply re-issuing it as new?
Is it possible that they had some kind of reciprocal arrangement with another gay site where they would exchange content and that's where they got their bonus stuff? If that's the case than maybe the other site is dead or maybe they had a falling out. Normally I would go check out the content of the site in question to see if I recognize the performers or the content itself but it would be a waste of time here because of the above stated reason regarding gay porn.
|
04-21-17 06:14pm
|
Reply
245
|
Sex And Submission
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I think your review is excellent and quite detailed. I respect your reasons for giving the site the score you did but there is no way that any of the current Kink sites deserve a perfect score because by your own admission they aren't perfect. The fact that their search engine sucks, the fact that you are basically relegated to scrolling from page to page to find a specific scene, the fact that most of their scenarios are not well thought out or well executed mean that they are more a distraction than an advantage. That said you did your homework and bothered to explain why you gave the site 100. I may not agree with your score but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
|
04-20-17 05:50pm
|
Reply
246
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with carey that you need at least three men for it to be a gangbang.
|
04-20-17 05:39pm
|
Reply
247
|
Analized
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for another great review. Now I can cross this one off my list of possible. Another con to add is that two of the models on the site appear in an anal scene but don't actually perform it and there is no way to know that unless you visit James site.
|
04-17-17 05:48pm
|
Reply
248
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surfingman's Poll
If the music distracts from the other sounds or from the action than it's a huge problem.
|
04-16-17 02:01pm
|
Reply
249
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I primarily use TBP and PU but I also use rabbits Review if they happen to have a more recent review.
I know there are a few more review sites but I only trust the reviews of the 3 I named.
|
04-14-17 09:06am
|
Reply
250
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I mostly glance at it because it's usually quite rare for me to discover a new model on a site. I already use multiple sources to find new models and then track down the sites they have worked for so that I can judge whether or not the site is worth joining to get those scenes.
|
04-12-17 05:50pm
|
